Growth factor responsiveness: role of MyoD and myogenin.

A differentiation-defective variant (DD-1) of the MM14 myoblasts acquired the ability to synthesize DNA in response to treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF) (R. W. Lim and S. D. Hauschka, 1984, Dev. Biol. 105, 48) and no longer expressed myogenic determinant genes (i.e., MyoD and myogenin) (P.R. Mueller, and B. Wold, 1989, Science 246, 780). To determine the effect of expression of MyoD on EGF responsiveness, DD-1 cells were cotransfected with a MyoD expression vector and with pRSVneo. A clone, MyoDD-1 cells, which was G418 resistant, formed multinuclear syncitia, and also expressed MyoD and myogenin, was further characterized. EGF responsiveness, as assessed by DNA synthesis, was decreased 5- to 10-fold in the MyoDD-1 cells from that in G418-resistant control DD-1 cells, despite similar EGF receptor numbers and binding affinities of the receptors. Responsiveness of MyoDD-1 cells to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) was also diminished although to a lesser extent. To determine the effects of decreased myogenic determinant gene expression on mitogen responsiveness, MM14 myoblasts were grown in medium supplemented with 5 microM 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BUdR-MM14). BUdR-MM14 cells had decreased expression of MyoD and myogenin, did not fuse, and had an altered morphology, from round to flat. The BUdR effect on fusion and cell shape was reversed by growth in control medium. BUdR-MM14 cells were responsive to EGF and had enhanced responsiveness to FGF. The combined studies support the view that expression of MyoD and/or myogenin contributes to negative regulation of mitogen responsiveness.     

Differential expression of two MyoD genes in fast and slow muscles of gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata)

Members of the myogenic regulatory gene family, including MyoD, Myf5, Myogenin and MRF4, are specifically expressed in myoblast and skeletal muscle cells and play important roles in regulating skeletal muscle development and growth. They are capable of converting a variety of non-muscle cells into myoblasts and myotubes. To better understand their roles in the development of fish muscles, we have isolated the MyoD genomic genes from gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata), analyzed the genomic structures, patterns of expression and the regulation of muscle-specific expression. We have demonstrated that seabream contain two distinct non-allelic MyoDgenes, MyoD1 and MyoD2. Sequence analysis revealed that these two MyoD genes shared a similar gene structure. Expression studies demonstrated that they exhibited overlapping but distinct patterns of expression in seabream embryos and adult slow and fast muscles. MyoD1 was expressed in adaxial cells that give rise to slow muscles, and lateral somitic cells that give rise to fast muscles. Similarly, MyoD2 was initially expressed in both slow and fast muscle precursors. However, MyoD2 expression gradually disappeared in the adaxial cells of 10- to 15-somite-stage embryos, whereas its expression in fast muscle precursor cells was maintained. In adult skeletal muscles, MyoD1 was expressed in both slow and fast muscles, whereas MyoD2 was specifically expressed in fast muscles. Treating seabream embryos with forskolin, a protein kinase A activator, inhibited MyoD1 expression in adaxial cells, while expression in fast muscle precursors was not affected. Promoter analysis demonstrated that both MyoD1 and MyoD2 promoters could drive green fluorescence protein expression in muscle cells of zebrafish embryos. Together, these data suggest that the two non-allelic MyoD genes are functional in seabream and their expression is regulated differently in fast and slow muscles. Hedgehog signaling is required for induction of MyoDexpression in adaxial cells.     

Changes in proliferation,differentiation, fibroblast growth factor 2 responsiveness and expression of syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 with turkey satellite cell age

Myogenic satellite cells are heterogeneous multipotential stem cells that are required for muscle repair, maintenance, and growth. The membrane‐associated heparan sulfate proteoglycans syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 differentially regulate satellite cell proliferation, differentiation, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) signal transduction, and expression of the myogenic regulatory factors MyoD and myogenin. The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of age on syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 satellite cell populations, proliferation, differentiation, FGF2 responsiveness, and expression of syndecan‐4, glypican‐1, MyoD, and myogenin using satellite cells isolated from the pectoralis major muscle of 1‐day‐old, 7‐week‐old and 16‐week‐old turkeys. Proliferation was significantly reduced in the 16‐week‐old satellite cells, while differentiation was decreased in the 7‐week‐old and the 16‐week‐old cells beginning at 48 h of differentiation. Fibroblast growth factor 2 responsiveness was highest in the 1‐day‐old and 7‐week‐old cells during proliferation; during differentiation there was an age‐dependent response to FGF2. Syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 satellite cell populations decreased with age, but syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 were differentially expressed with age during proliferation and differentiation. MyoD and myogenin mRNA expression was significantly decreased in 16‐week‐old cells compared to the 1‐day‐old and 7‐week‐old cells. MyoD and myogenin protein expression was higher during proliferation in the 16‐week‐old cells and decreased with differentiation. These data demonstrate an age‐dependent effect on syndecan‐4 and glypican‐1 satellite cell subpopulations, which may be associated with age‐related changes in proliferation, differentiation, FGF2 responsiveness, and the expression of the myogenic regulatory factors MyoD and myogenin.     

MyoD cannot compensate for the absence of myogenin during skeletal muscle differentiation in murine embryonic stem cells

myogenin (-/-) mice display severe skeletal muscle defects despite expressing normal levels of MyoD. The failure of MyoD to compensate for myogenin could be explained by distinctions in protein function or by differences in patterns of gene expression. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we compared the abilities of constitutively expressed myogenin and MyoD to support muscle differentiation in embryoid bodies made from myogenin (-/-) ES cells. Differentiated embryoid bodies from wild-type embryonic stem (ES) cells made extensive skeletal muscle, but embryoid bodies from myogenin (-/-) ES cells had greatly attenuated muscle-forming capacity. The inability of myogenin (-/-) ES cells to generate muscle was independent of endogenous MyoD expression. Skeletal muscle was restored in myogenin (-/-) ES cells by constitutive expression of myogenin. In contrast, constitutive expression of MyoD resulted in only marginal enhancement of skeletal muscle, although myocyte numbers greatly increased. The results indicated that constitutive expression of MyoD led to enhanced myogenic commitment of myogenin (-/-) cells but also indicated that committed cells were impaired in their ability to form muscle sheets without myogenin. Thus, despite their relatedness, myogenin's role in muscle formation is distinct from that of MyoD, and the distinction cannot be explained merely by differences in their expression properties.     

C6ORF32 is upregulated during muscle cell differentiation and induces the formation of cellular filopodia

We have identified a gene by microarray analysis that is located on chromosome 6 (c6orf32), whose expression is increased during human fetal myoblast differentiation. The protein encoded by c6orf32 is expressed both in myogenic and non-myogenic primary cells isolated from 18-week old human fetal skeletal muscle. Immunofluorescent staining indicated that C6ORF32 localizes to the cellular cytoskeleton and filopodia, and often displays polarized expression within the cell. mRNA knockdown experiments in the C2C12 murine myoblast cell line demonstrated that cells lacking c6orf32 exhibit a myogenic differentiation defect, characterized by a decrease in the expression of myogenin and myosin heavy chain (MHC) proteins, whereas MyoD1 was unaltered. In contrast, overexpression of c6orf32 in C2C12 or HEK293 cells (a non-muscle cell line) promoted formation of long membrane protrusions (filopodia). Analysis of serial deletion mutants demonstrated that amino acids 55-113 of C6ORF32 are likely involved in filopodia formation. These results indicate that C6ORF32 is a novel protein likely to play multiple functions, including promoting myogenic cell differentiation, cytoskeletal rearrangement and filopodia formation.     

Differential expression of FGF receptors and of myogenic regulatory factors in primary cultures of satellite cells originating from fast (EDL) and slow (Soleus) twitch rat muscles.

In the rat, the fast and slow twitch muscles respectively Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and Soleus present differential characteristics during regeneration. This suggests that their satellite cells responsible for muscle growth and repair represent distinct cellular populations. We have previously shown that satellite cells dissociated from Soleus and grown in vitro proliferate more readily than those isolated from EDL muscle. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are known as regulators of myoblast proliferation and several studies have revealed a relationship between the response of myoblasts to FGF and the expression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRF) of the MyoD family by myoblasts. Therefore, we presently examined the possibility that the satellite cells isolated from EDL and Soleus muscles differ in the expression of FGF receptors (FGF-R) and of MRF expression. FGF-R1 and -R4 were strongly expressed in proliferating cultures whereas FGF-R2 and R3 were not detected in these cultures. In differentiating cultures, only -R1 was present in EDL satellite cells while FGF-R4 was also still expressed in Soleus cells. Interestingly, the unconventional receptor for FGF called cystein rich FGF receptor (CFR), of yet unknown function, was mainly detected in EDL satellite cell cultures. Soleus and EDL satellite cell cultures also differed in the expression MRFs. These results are consistent with the notion that satellite cells from fast and slow twitch muscles belong to different types of myogenic cells and suggest that satellite cells might play distinct roles in the formation and diversification of fast and slow fibres.     

Gene expression patterns of the fibroblast growth factors and their receptors during myogenesis of rat satellite cells.

Satellite cells are the myogenic precursors in postnatal muscle and are situated beneath the myofiber basement membrane. We previously showed that fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2, basic FGF) stimulates a greater number of satellite cells to enter the cell cycle but does not modify the overall schedule of a short proliferative phase and a rapid transition to the differentiated state as the satellite cells undergo myogenesis in isolated myofibers. In this study we investigated whether other members of the FGF family can maintain the proliferative state of the satellite cells in rat myofiber cultures. We show that FGF1, FGF4, and FGF6 (as well as hepatocyte growth factor, HGF) enhance satellite cell proliferation to a similar degree as that seen with FGF2, whereas FGF5 and FGF7 are ineffective. None of the growth factors prolongs the proliferative phase or delays the transition of the satellite cells to the differentiating, myogenin(+) state. However, FGF6 retards the rapid exit of the cells from the myogenin(+) state that routinely occurs in myofiber cultures. To determine which of the above growth factors might be involved in regulating satellite cells in vivo, we examined their mRNA expression patterns in cultured rat myofibers using RT-PCR. The expression of all growth factors, excluding FGF4, was confirmed. Only FGF6 was expressed at a higher level in the isolated myofibers and not in the connective tissue cells surrounding the myofibers or in satellite cells dissociated away from the muscle. By Western blot analysis, we also demonstrated the presence of FGF6 protein in the skeletal musle tissue. Our studies therefore suggest that the myofibers serve as the main source for the muscle FGF6 in vivo. We also used RT-PCR to analyze the expression patterns of the four tyrosine kinase FGF receptors (FGFR1-FGFR4) and of the HGF receptor (c-met) in the myofiber cultures. Depending on the time in culture, expression of all receptors was detected, with FGFR2 and FGFR3 expressed only at a low level. Only FGFR4 was expressed at a higher level in the myofibers but not the connective tissue cell cultures. FGFR4 was also expressed at a higher level in satellite cells compared to the nonmyogenic cells when the two cell populations were released from the muscle tissue and fractionated by Percoll density centrifugation. The unique localization patterns of FGF6 and FGFR4 may reflect specific roles for these members of the FGF signaling complex during myogenesis in adult skeletal muscle.     

Differential expression of myogenic determination genes in muscle cells: possible autoactivation by the Myf gene products.

The development of muscle cells involves the action of myogenic determination factors. In this report, we show that human skeletal muscle tissue contains, besides the previously described Myf-5, two additional factors Myf-3 and Myf-4 which represent the human homologues of the rodent proteins MyoD1 and myogenin. The genes encoding Myf-3, Myf-4 and Myf-5 are located on human chromosomes 11, 1, and 12 respectively. Constitutive expression of a single factor is sufficient to convert mouse C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts to phenotypically normal muscle cells. The myogenic conversion of 10T1/2 fibroblasts results in the activation of the endogenous MyoD1 and Myf-4 (myogenin) genes. This observation suggests that the expression of Myf proteins leads to positive autoregulation of the members of the Myf gene family. Individual myogenic colonies derived from MCA C115 cells (10T1/2 fibroblast transformed by methylcholanthrene) express various levels of endogenous MyoD1 mRNA ranging from nearly zero to high levels. The Myf-5 gene was generally not activated in 10T1/2 derived myogenic cell lines but was expressed in some MCA myoblasts. In primary human muscle cells Myf-3 and Myf-4 mRNA but very little Myf-5 mRNA is expressed. In mouse C2 and P2 muscle cell lines MyoD1 is abundantly synthesized together with myogenin. In contrast, the rat muscle lines L8 and L6 and the mouse BC3H1 cells express primarily myogenin and low levels of Myf-5 but no MyoD1. Myf-4 (myogenin) mRNA is present in all muscle cell lines at the onset of differentiation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The third wave of myotome colonization by mitotically competent progenitors: regulating the balance between differentiation and proliferation during muscle development

The myotome is formed by a first wave of pioneer cells originating from the entire dorsomedial region of epithelial somites and a second wave that derives from all four lips of the dermomyotome but generates myofibers from only the rostral and caudal edges. Because the precedent progenitors exit the cell cycle upon myotome colonization, subsequent waves must account for consecutive growth. In this study, double labeling with CM-DiI and BrdU revealed the appearance of a third wave of progenitors that enter the myotome as mitotically active cells from both rostral and caudal dermomyotome edges. These cells express the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor FREK and treatment with FGF4 promotes their proliferation and redistribution towards the center of the myotome. Yet, they are negative for MyoD, Myf5 and FGF4, which are, however, expressed in myofibers. The proliferating progenitors first appear around the 30-somite stage in cervical-level myotomes and their number continuously increases, making up 85% of total muscle nuclei by embryonic day (E)4. By this stage, generation of second-wave myofibers, which also enter from the extreme lips is still under way. Formation of the latter fibers peaks at 30 somites and progressively decreases with age until E4. Thus, cells in these dermomyotome lips generate simultaneously distinct types of muscle progenitors in changing proportions as a function of age. Consistent with a heterogeneity in the cellular composition of the extreme lips, MyoD is normally expressed in only a subset of these epithelial cells. Treatment with Sonic hedgehog drives most of them to become MyoD positive and then to become myofibers, with a concurrent reduction in the proportion of proliferating muscle precursors.     

A New Avian Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor in Myogenic and Chondrogenic Cell Differentiation

We studied the expression of FREK (fibroblast growth factor receptor-like embryonic kinase), a new receptor recently cloned from quail embryo, during the differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells and epiphyseal growth-plate chondrocytes. Although FREK mRNA was expressed in both cell types, satellite cells expressed higher levels of this mRNA than chondrocytes. FREK gene expression was found to be modulated by b-FGF in a biphasic manner: low concentrations increased expression, whereas high concentrations attenuated it. In both cell cultures, the levels of FREK mRNA declined during terminal differentiation. Moreover, retinoic acid (RA), which induces skeletal muscle satellite cells to differentiate, also caused a reduction in FREK gene expression in these cells. Induction of chondrocyte differentiation with ascorbic acid was monitored by a decrease in collagen type II gene expression and an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity. Satellite cell differentiation was marked by morphological changes as well as by increased sarcomeric myogenin content and creatine kinase activity and changes in the expression of the regulatory muscle-specific genes, MyoD and myogenin. DNA synthesis in both cell types was stimulated by b-FGF. However, in satellite cells, the response was bell-shaped, peaking at 1 ng/ml b-FGF, whereas in chondrocytes, higher levels of b-FGF were needed. b-FGF-dependent DNA synthesis in satellite cells was decreased by RA at concentrations over 10^-7M . The observed correlation between the level of FREK gene expression and various stages of differentiation, its modulation by b-FGF and RA, as well as the correlation between FREK gene expression and the physiological response to b-FGF, suggest that this specific FGF receptor plays an important role in muscle and cartilage cell differentiation.     

Glucocorticoid inhibition of C2C12 proliferation rate and differentiation capacity in relation to mRNA levels of the MRF gene family

The muscle regulatory factors (MRF) gene family regulate muscle fibre development. Several hormones and drugs also affect muscle development. Glucocorticoids are the only drugs reported to have a beneficial effect on muscle degenerative disorders. We investigated the glucocorticoid-related effects on C2C12 myoblast proliferation rate, morphological differentiation, and subsequent mRNA expression patterns of the MRF genes. C2C12 cells were incubated with the glucocorticoids dexamethasone or alpha-methyl-prednisolone. Both glucocorticoids showed comparable effects. Glucocorticoid treatment of C2C12 cells during the proliferative phase reduced the proliferation rate of the cells dose dependently, especially during the third and fourth day of culture, increased MyoD1, myf-5, and MRF4 mRNA levels, and reduced myogenin mRNA level, compared to untreated control cells. Thus, the mRNA level of proliferation-specific MyoD1 and myf-5 expression does not seem to associate with C2C12 myoblast proliferation rate. Glucocorticoid treatment of C2C12 cells during differentiation reduced the differentiation capacity dose dependently, which is accompanied by a dose dependent reduction of myogenin mRNA level, and increased MyoD1, myf-5, and MRF4 mRNA levels compared to untreated control cells. Therefore, we conclude that glucocorticoid treatment reduces differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts probably through reduction of differentiation-specific myogenin mRNA level, while inducing higher mRNA levels of proliferation-associated MRF genes.