Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions

Distraction osteogenesis has been used increasingly for midfacial advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and in severe developmental hypoplasia of the midface. In these patients, the degree of advancement required is often so great that restriction of the adjacent soft tissues may preclude stable advancement in one stage. Whereas distraction is an ideal solution by which to gradually lengthen both the bones and the soft tissues, potential problems remain in translating the distraction forces to the midface. In these patients, severe developmental hypoplasia may be associated with weak union between the zygoma and the maxilla, increasing the chance of zygomaticomaxillary dysjunction when using internal devices that translate distraction force to the maxilla through the zygoma. Eight cases are reported in which either internal or external distraction systems were used for midface advancement following Le Fort III (n = 7) or monobloc (n = 1) osteotomies. Cases of patients in whom hypoplasia at the zygomaticomaxillary junction altered or impaired plans for midface distraction were reported from three host institutions. Seven patients had midface hypoplasia associated with syndromic craniosynostosis, and one patient had severe developmental midface hypoplasia. The distraction protocol was modified to successfully complete midface advancement in light of weakness at the zygomaticomaxillary junction in seven patients. Modifications included change from an internal to an external distraction system in two patients, rigid fixation and bone graft stabilization of the midface in one patient, and plate stabilization of a fractured or unstable zygomaticomaxillary junction followed by resumption of internal distraction in four patients. Previous infection and bone loss involving both malar complexes precluded one patient from being a candidate for an internal distraction system. Using a problem-based approach, successful advancement of the midface ranging from 9 to 26 mm at the occlusal level as measured by preoperative and postoperative cephalograms was undergone by all patients. Advantages and disadvantages of the respective distraction systems are reviewed to better understand unique patient characteristics leading to the successful use of these devices for correction of severe midface hypoplasia.     

Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction

High Le Fort I osteotomy and maxillary distraction has become an accepted method for the treatment of maxillary retrusion in children and teenagers with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies. This procedure effectively corrects the dentofacial deformity in these patients. No major surgical morbidity has been reported. During the past 4 years, 94 cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia received Le Fort I osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis at the authors' center. Two of them developed blindness after this operation. The first case was a girl with bilateral cleft lip and palate with median facial dysplasia. She received high Le Fort I osteotomy at age 12 years 4 months to correct maxillary retrusion. Right eye swelling and ecchymosis was found after surgery. The patient complained of vision loss in that eye 2 days later. Computed tomography showed subarachnoid hemorrhage and skull base hematoma. There were no atypical fractures in the orbit, pterygoid plates, sphenoid bone, and skull base. Angiogram revealed left ophthalmic and basilar artery aneurysm. The second case was a 12-year-old boy with left cleft lip and palate. He received Le Fort I osteotomy to correct maxillary retrusion. During surgery, abnormal pupil dilatation was found after the osteotomy and down-fracture of maxilla. Emergent computed tomography found no hemorrhage or atypical fractures. Examination revealed complete left optic neuropathy and partial right abducens nerve palsy with mydriasis. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and repeated computed tomography revealed no sign of orbital injury, vascular problem, or abnormal fractures. The cause of blindness was unknown. In both cases, a steroid was used. Maxillary distraction was continued. Recovery of meaningful visual sense did not occur after 3 and 2 years' follow-up, respectively. A review of the literature revealed five other patients who suffered from visual loss after Le Fort I osteotomy. Inadvertent skull base fractures were identified in two cases, but a cause for the blindness was not known in the others. Induced hypotension and indirect trauma may be responsible for the optic nerve injury. In none of the cases was meaningful visual sense recovered, although high-dose steroids were given. In conclusion, a total of seven cases developed blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy. Once blindness develops, the prognosis is poor. High Le Fort I osteotomy should be performed with extreme care, and perhaps the informed consent should include visual loss as a complication of the procedure.     

Orthopedic intrusion of premaxilla with distraction devices before alveolar bone grafting in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate

Surgical repositioning of the downward displaced premaxilla in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients remains a controversial and perplexing issue because of its detrimental effects on the growth of the premaxilla. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to introduce and evaluate the treatment results of an innovative technique for nonsurgically intruding the downward displaced premaxilla. Eight consecutive cases of bilateral cleft lip and palate at the age of mixed dentition were included for the correction of their premaxillary deformities. A pair of intraoral tooth-borne distraction devices was used for the orthopedic intrusion. Serial lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs were taken periodically for evaluating the growth of the premaxilla 1 year before the intrusion, changes during the intrusion, and growth/relapse up to 1 year after the intrusion. There was no overgrowth of the premaxilla or overeruption of the maxillary incisors during the 1-year observing period before the orthopedic intrusion. The treatment results revealed that the downward displaced premaxillae were all corrected within 1 month. Cephalometrically, 46 percent of the correction resulted from a true orthopedic intrusion and another 54 percent from a dentoalveolar effect in which the maxillary incisors were intruded and the premaxillary dentoalveolus was shortened. The cephalometric evaluations also implied that what occurred during the orthopedic intrusion was mostly the sutural contraction osteogenesis/osteolysis in the vomeropremaxillary suture combined with slightly mechanical upward displacement of the vomeronasal septum complex and nasal bones. The orthopedic intrusion of the premaxilla with distraction devices is an effective nonsurgical method for correcting the downward displaced premaxilla before alveolar bone grafting in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate, and the results remained stable after 1 year.     

Velopharyngeal function following maxillary advancement.

In a series of 40 patients who had maxillary advancements, none developed velopharyngeal incompetence. Unlike the cleft palate patient who is more at risk, there are distinct anatomical characteristics in craniofacial dysostosis which favor maintenance of the integrity of the velopharyngeal mechanism. Hyponasality was eliminated in 5 patients with Crouzon's disease. On cephalometric study, it was observed that after maxillary advancement the nasopharyngeal volume was expanded and the angle formed by the hard and soft palates was increased. On phonating cephalograms, the velopharyngeal contact became more physiological after maxillary advancement in the craniofacial dysostosis patient. The only postoperative articulatory changes after maxillary advancement were in the production of the /s/ sound, which is particularly sensitive to changes in dentoalveolar relationships.     

Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques.

The present report summarizes the evolution of design for a modular internal distraction system that is applicable throughout the craniofacial region. Eleven patients (5 boys, 6 girls), whose ages ranged from 4 months to 10 years at the time of distraction, constitute the basis for this study. The clinical indications for distraction were exorbitism with corneal exposure (n = 1), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 4), tracheostomy decannulation (n = 1), severe maxillary hypoplasia with class III malocclusion (n = 3), severe vertical and sagittal maxillary deficiency with anophthalmia (n = 1), and relapse following frontoorbital advancement in a case of rare craniofacial clefting (n = 1). Twenty-two distraction devices were used in these 11 patients. Two initial prototypes were tested (prototype 1 = 8 devices; prototype 2 = 2 devices) until the modular internal distraction system (MIDS, Howmedica-Leibinger, Inc.) was developed (n = 12 devices). The craniofacial osteotomies used were Le Fort III (n = 4), monobloc (n = 3), mandibular (n = 3), Le Fort I (n = 2), and cranial (n = 1). The distraction distances ranged from 11 to 28 mm. One patient undergoing mandibular distraction developed transient swelling in the left mandibular region, which responded to antibiotics. There were no other complications. Depending on the age of the patient and the length of distraction, the distraction gap was allowed to consolidate from 6 weeks to 3 months. The devices were then removed on either an outpatient or a 23-hour-stay basis. The modular internal distraction system permits widespread application of easily customizable, buried distraction devices throughout the craniofacial region.     

Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis

Midfacial hypoplasia has been corrected by Le Fort III or monobloc forward advancement in one stage in syndromic craniosynostosis, but recently developed distraction osteogenesis has been in use. Whereas the amount of forward mobilization in Le Fort III conventional osteotomy is determined by the preplanned fabricated interdental splint, that in Le Fort III distraction is determined by the positions of the inferior orbital rim, malar complex, and nose. Therefore, the forward mobilization of the upper part of the midface may sometimes be insufficient when one focuses on the final occlusion, and the occlusion might not be satisfied when the forward mobilization is sufficient. Correction of the midfacial hypoplasia should be considered differently in the upper and lower portions of the midface. The upper portion contains the inferior orbit and nose, and the lower portion contains the occlusal structure of the maxillary dentoalveolar portion with the mandible. Separating the midface into two portions and conducting the distraction osteogenesis in both portions separately in different amounts and vectors of distraction is described in this article. Although distraction of the upper portion of the midface can be conducted in one direction with an internal device, distraction of the lower portion of the midface is preferred for conduction by a controllable device because of the need to obtain the preferred occlusion. To obtain better functional and aesthetic results in midfacial distraction in adults and adolescents with syndromic craniosynostosis, dual Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I midfacial distraction osteogenesis was performed in four cases (in two patients with Crouzon syndrome and in two patients with Apert syndrome). Two females and two males are described (age range, 13 to 26 years). An internal device was used for the upper portion of the midface and an external device was used for the lower portion. The amount of distraction ranged from 14 to 21 mm in the upper portion of the midface and from 11 to 18 mm in the lower portion. No particular complications were noticed over a follow-up period of 10 to 38 months (average follow-up, 19.8 months).     

Complex maxillary fractures: role of buttress reconstruction and immediate bone grafts

Between 1978 and 1984, 558 patients with complex facial fractures have been treated. One hundred and seventy-one of these patients have had complex Le Fort fractures of the maxilla. In this group of patients, the importance of direct anatomic reconstruction of the anterior maxillary buttresses has been assessed. Complete exposure of the injured buttresses will facilitate assessment of the exact fracture pattern. Direct fixation of the medial and lateral maxillary buttresses on each side, in combination with immediate bone-graft reinforcement or replacement of comminuted or missing buttresses, will facilitate the reconstruction of even the most severely injured maxilla in one stage. This approach is combined with similar reconstructive techniques in other areas of the craniofacial skeleton. Associated mandibular fractures are managed with rigid internal fixation utilizing A-O techniques. The use of these techniques dramatically facilitates airway management and simplifies the treatment of the edentulous patient, the patient with bilateral condylar neck fractures, and those patients with sagittal splitting of the maxilla and palate. The use of both internal craniofacial suspension wires and external craniofacial suspension devices has become largely unnecessary, and reconstruction of even the most complex injuries in one stage with minimal complications and secondary deformities is made possible.     

Long-term outcome study of bilateral mandibular distraction: a comparison of Treacher Collins and Nager syndromes to other types of micrognathia

A long-term follow-up study of patients who underwent bilateral mandibular distraction is presented, and the results of patients with Treacher Collins syndrome and Nager syndrome are compared with results for other forms of congenital micrognathia. It was hypothesized that the factors responsible for the predetermined, syndrome-specific shape of the mandible in patients with Treacher Collins and Nager syndromes would alter the long-term results of linear (uniplanar) distraction of the mandible. Thus, over time, the mandibles would remodel to preoperative form while maintaining the increase in volume. To investigate this hypothesis, all patients treated with bilateral mandibular distraction who had at least 1.5 years of follow-up, including satisfactory cephalometric examinations, were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups were identified. Group 1 (n = 6) were Treacher Collins and Nager syndrome patients (ages, 2 to 13 years; mean, 5.2 years) and group 2 (n = 6) included other forms of bilateral, congenital micrognathia (ages, 1.5 to 19 years; mean, 8.4 years). Serial cephalometric measurements were recorded before distraction, after distraction, and at least 18 months after distraction. Mandibular mean linear distraction distance (as recorded on the device) averaged 24.5 mm in group 1 and 26.2 mm in group 2. In group 1, the antegonial angle (angle from the mandibular plane to the top of the antegonial notch) decreased after distraction by 3.8 degrees, and the antegonial notch height was reduced by 1.6 mm. The posttreatment morphologic change was modified significantly over time, with a 3.7-degree increase of the antegonial angle and a 1.2-mm deepening of the antegonial notch. In group 2, the immediate reduction in height of the antegonial notching was subtler; however, long-term recurrence of the antegonial notching was also observed. At the end of distraction, the mean group 1 gonial angle became 8 degrees more obtuse. In contrast, patients in group 2 developed a more acute angle (mean, 8 degrees). The mandibles of the Treacher Collins syndrome patients (group 1) maintained their more obtuse postdistraction gonial angle during the period of follow-up, whereas over time this change was reversed in group 2 patients. In conclusion, experience with bilateral mandibular distraction has demonstrated that long-term determination of mandibular form is more complex than either the amount of distraction or the direction of the distraction vector. The underlying genotype and the musculoskeletal milieu must be taken into account when planning distraction, as these factors tend to remodel the mandible into its preoperative shape over time, despite the fact that the increased mandibular volume and projection are maintained.     

Interdental distraction osteogenesis and rapid orthodontic tooth movement: a novel approach to approximate a wide alveolar cleft or bony defect

The closure of a wide alveolar cleft and fistula in cleft patients and the reconstruction of a maxillary dentoalveolar defect in traumatic patients are challenging for both orthodontists and surgeons. This is due to the difficulty in achieving complete closure by using local attached gingiva and the great volume of bone required for the graft. In this article, the authors propose using interdental distraction osteogenesis to create a segment of new alveolar bone and attached gingiva for the complete approximation of a wide alveolar cleft/fistula and the reconstruction of a maxillary dentoalveolar defect. They performed this procedure on one patient with a traumatic maxillary dentoalveolar defect and 10 patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lips and palates who had varied dentoalveolar clefts/fistulas. Interdental and maxillary osteotomies were performed on one side of the dental arch by the cleft or defect. After a latency period of 3 days, the osteotomized distal segment of the dental arch was then distracted and transported toward the cleft or defect by using a toothborne intraoral distraction device. The alveoli and gingivae on both ends of the cleft or defect were approximated after distraction osteogenesis. The need for extensive alveolar bone grafting was eliminated. A segment of new edentulous alveolus and attached gingiva was created interdentally at a site distant to the cleft or defect. In the cleft patients, teeth were moved orthodontically into the regenerate (newly formed alveolar bone) dental crowding 1 week after distraction. The orthodontic tooth movement was rapidly completed in 3 months, and the edentulous space was eliminated. Interdental distraction osteogenesis minimizes an alveolar cleft/fistula and helps reconstruct a maxillary dentoalveolar defect by approximating the native alveoli and gingivae; it also creates new alveolar bone and gingiva for rapid orthodontic tooth movement.     

Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis

A wide variety of disease processes produce alteration of midfacial skeletal growth, resulting in moderate-to-severe midface deficiency presenting as retrusion associated with Angle's class III malocclusion. Le Fort III osteotomies with advancement can provide an excellent tool for correction of this deformity. Recently, the corrective procedure of choice for advancement of midfacial segments has been distraction osteogenesis after osteotomy. Straight linear advancement is the most common choice for corrective movement of the midfacial segment, whether accomplished through acute surgical advancement or through the progressive distraction technique. Unfortunately, linear advancement can produce abnormal configurations, both at the nasal root and lateral orbits, regardless of the technique used. Enophthalmos, caused by orbital enlargement, may limit the advancement necessary to achieve class I occlusion.The authors have extended the utility of the Le Fort III procedure and have improved the final outcome by creating a controlled rotation advancement of the midfacial segment using distraction. The application of an existing internal distraction device is modified to control the movement of the midfacial segment in a rotation advancement path. Included in the series were 10 patients with severe midface retrusion secondary to multiple congenital syndromes, along with cleft lip and palate. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 to 14 years. An internal distraction system was used in all cases. Application of the distractor was substantially modified to simplify both fixation and removal and to produce controlled rotation advancement. The team orthodontist determined the final occlusal relationship. Percutaneous distractor drive rods were removed 4 to 6 weeks after active distraction to increase patient comfort. The distractors and all associated hardware were removed after 12 to 16 weeks of consolidation; follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 3 years.By using the modified distractor application to produce rotation advancement, the contour abnormalities at the nasal root and lateral orbit and the enophthalmos produced by linear advancement were eliminated. Significant improvement in facial contour and class I occlusion was obtained in all cases. Complications consisted of near exposure of the device in one patient. Stability has been excellent, with no relapse reported by the orthodontist.Rotational advancement of facial segments by distraction allows successful early intervention in patients with significant midface retrusion. The abnormal nasal root and lateral orbital configurations produced by direct linear advancement are avoided, and a stable and normalized facial configuration is produced.     

An analysis of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients.

We present a series of 24 consecutive cleft lip and palate patients aged 16 to 46 years (mean age 27 years) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement by the senior author over the past 8 years. Two groups, one of 12 patients with wire fixation and one of 12 patients with miniplate fixation, were evaluated. Each group had 10 unilateral and 2 bilateral clefts. All patients were grafted with autogenous bone (8 cranial, 14 iliac, and 2 mandibular). Horizontal advancement was 3 mm to 2 cm (with a mean of 7.8 mm). Vertical movement ranged from a shortening of 5 mm to a lengthening of 1.3 cm (mean 2.3 mm of lengthening). The amount and timing of relapse were compared in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. The plated group was more stable in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.05). No significant skeletal relapses occurred after the first year. Statistically significant dental relapse occurred only in the wired group. Three patients developed transverse collapse of the small maxillary cleft segment, and four developed incisor angulation to compensate for maxillary skeletal relapse. The presence of a pharyngeal flap at the time of advancement appeared to increase relapse in both horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.03), but there were too few patients (7 of 24) with pharyngeal flaps to prove this conclusively. We also concluded that pterygomandibular grafting is not necessary to achieve excellent results using miniplate fixation; autogenous grafting of the anterior maxillary osteotomy alone provides the necessary stability.     

Skeletal stability after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Outcomes in 30 adults and adolescents judged skeletally mature who had unilateral cleft lip and palate and underwent Le Fort I advancement were investigated to determine amount and timing of relapse, correlation between advancement and relapse, effect of performing multiple jaw procedures, effect of different types of bone grafts, effect of pharyngoplasty in place at the time of osteotomy, and effectiveness of various methods of internal fixation. Tracings of preoperative and serial postoperative lateral cephalograms were digitized to calculate horizontal and vertical maxillary changes. No significant differences in outcome was seen between patients who had maxillary surgery alone and those who had operations on both jaws, nor did the outcome vary significantly with the type of autogenous bone graft used or the segmentalization of the Le Fort osteotomy. Mean "effective" advancement was greater immediately and 2 years after surgery in those patients who did not have a pharyngoplasty in place before the operation. Advancement also was greater immediately and after 2 years in the miniplate fixation group than in patients with direct-wire fixation. Mean downward (vertical) displacement was 2.6 mm with a relapse of 1.4 mm after 2 years. Amounts of relapse and of advancement or displacement did not correlate significantly.     

Immediate versus delayed midface distraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device

The theoretic advantage of distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton, especially in cases of severe midface retrusion and in the presence of maxillary scarring, is prevention of relapse following significant advancements. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of a new low-profile, intraoral, internal device for midface distraction at the conventional or high Le Fort I level. In addition, the present study compares the efficacy of immediate versus delayed distraction on subsequent maxillary relapse. Four adult rhesus Macaca mulatta monkeys were divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent immediate midface distraction; group 2 underwent delayed distraction. All four monkeys underwent a modified Le Fort I osteotomy through an upper buccal sulcus incision and bilateral application of the intraoral midface distraction devices. No other osteotomies or incisions were necessary. Immediate distraction, performed in group 1, entailed intraoperative activation of the devices and distraction of 10 mm followed by a 5-day lag period before postoperative activation and distraction of an additional 10 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Delayed distraction, performed in group 2, entailed a 5-day postoperative lag period before device activation and distraction of 20 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Both groups thus underwent 20 mm of midface distraction. All devices were removed 6 weeks after completion of distraction. All monkeys tolerated the devices and daily distraction uneventfully. On the basis of serial cephalograms and dental models obtained throughout the experimental period, there was no evidence of relapse in either the immediate or delayed groups 6 months after distraction. In addition, on the basis of histologic, ultrastructural, and dry skull analysis, no significant differences were observed in the quality of regenerate bone obtained when comparing the immediate and delayed distraction groups. Significant midface advancement is thus feasible using this new internal, intraoral distraction device, which presents several advantages over other internal devices that require coronal incisions and additional osteotomies to achieve midface advancement. In addition, immediate distraction may abbreviate the distraction period without adverse sequelae.     

Validation of in vivo assessment of facial soft-tissue volume changes and clinical application in midfacial distraction: a technical report

The purpose of this study was to validate the assessment of visible volume changes of the facial soft tissue with an optical three-dimensional sensor and to introduce new parameters for the evaluation of the soft-tissue shape achieved from three-dimensional data of selected cases of midfacial distraction. Images of a truncated cone of known volume were assessed repeatedly with an optical three-dimensional sensor based on phase-measuring triangulation to calculate the volume. Two cubic centimeters of anesthetic solution was injected into the right malar region of 10 volunteers who gave their informed consent. Three-dimensional images were assessed before and immediately after the injections for the assessment of the visible volume change. In five patients who underwent midfacial distraction after a high quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy, three-dimensional scans were acquired before and 6 and 24 months after the operation. The visible soft-tissue volume change in the malar-midfacial area and the mean distance of the accommodation vector that transformed the preoperative into the postoperative surface were calculated. The volume of the truncated cone was 235.26 +/- 1.01 cc, revealing a measurement uncertainty of 0.4 percent. The injections of anesthetic solution into the malar area resulted in an average visible volume change of 2.06 +/- 0.06 cc. The measurement uncertainty was 3 percent. In the five patients, the average distance of maxillary advancement was 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm after 6 months and 5.4 +/- 3.0 mm after 2 years. It was accompanied by a mean visible volume increase of 8.92 +/- 5.95 cc on the right side and 9.54 +/- 4.39 cc on the left side after 6 months and 3.54 +/- 3.70 cc and 4.80 +/- 3.47 cc, respectively, after 2 years. The mean distance of the accommodation vector was 4.41 +/- 1.94 mm on the right side and 4.74 +/- 1.32 mm on the left side after 6 months and 1.62 +/- 1.96 mm and 2.16 +/- 1.52 mm, respectively, after 2 years. The assessment of visible volume changes by optical three-dimensional images can be carried out with considerable accuracy. The determination of volume changes and accompanying accommodation vectors completes the cephalometric analysis during the follow-up of patients undergoing midfacial distraction. The new parameters will help to assess normative soft-tissue data on the basis of three-dimensional imaging with a view to an improved three-dimensional prediction of the operative outcome of orthognathic surgery.     

Characterization of midface maxillary membranous bone formation during distraction osteogenesis

The purpose of the study was to follow the early events in bone formation and neovascularization during maxillary distraction and after the consolidation period and to define the characterization of the new bone in the distracted area. Maxillary osteotomy was performed in seven sheep. In five animals, an external distraction device was used for maxillary lengthening of 20 mm at a rate of 1 mm/day for 20 days. Another two animals served as controls without distraction. Sequential biopsies were performed. The methods used for analysis were histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural by transmission electron microscopy. During the 5 days of latency, a fibrin clot was formed that after 5 days of distraction was replaced by granulation tissue, proliferating mesenchyme-like cells, and capillaries. After 10 days of distraction, the regenerated tissue could be divided into three main zones and two transitional areas: a central zone occupied by many polygonal mesenchyme-like cells and spindle-shaped cells that proliferated intensively; two paracentral zones on both sides of the central zone in which many cells showed morphologic signs of apoptosis leading to a decreased number of fibroblast-like cells embedded in wavy collagen fibers; a transitional area from the central to the paracentral zone in which concentric cellular colonies were believed to represent a novel form of vasculogenesis; distal-proximal zones, located on both sides of the paracentral zones and in continuation with the old bone, showed delicate new woven bone trabeculae that grew continuously in the direction of lengthening and gradually became mineralized; and a transitional area from the paracentral to the distal-proximal zones in which there was recruitment of preosteoblasts from the distracted tissue to the trabecular tips. These further differentiated into osteoblasts that contributed to the trabecular growth. The histologic feature pattern was similar after 15 and 20 days of continuous distraction. At the end of lengthening, after 20 days, delicate longitudinally oriented trabeculae continued to grow by recruiting preosteogenic cells from the central distracted tissue, became mineralized, and were rimmed by osteoblasts. After 6 weeks of retention, the trabeculae thickened and consisted of a mixture of lamellar and woven bone. In conclusion, the distraction force creates a pool of undifferentiated mesenchyme-like cells with osteogenic potential and triggers capillary formation, a clear zonation can be observed during active lengthening, and new bone trabeculae begin to form between 5 and 10 days after distraction, soon become aligned with osteoblasts, and continue to grow as long as distraction force is applied. This characterization may help in any exogenous involvement with growth factors to improve bone quality.     

Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton

In summary, distraction osteogenesis is a safe and effective means of achieving bone lengthening. These techniques were originally applied to the long bones of the extremities; over the past 10 years they have been effectively applied to the bones of the craniofacial skeleton. The new bone regenerate that is observed after distraction osteogenesis is stable, and relapse rates after skeletal advancement are believed to be lower than with conventional osteotomy and bone graft techniques. There is considerable variability in distraction protocols employed in clinical practice, including differences in the types of devices used and in the rate, rhythm, latency, and period of consolidation for distraction osteogenesis. The greatest application for distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial skeleton has been with mandible lengthening, for which there is presently a 10-year clinical experience. Midfacial advancement is a newer application of distraction osteogenesis, for which clinical experience has been accrued over the past 5 years. This latter experience indicates that distraction osteogenesis is a viable treatment option for lengthening of the hypoplastic mandible and midface. These techniques have advantages over conventional means of bone graft and rigid fixation because of the quality of the bone regenerate, the decrease in the long-term relapse rate of the advanced bone segments in both the mandible and the midface, and the simultaneous soft-tissue elongation that accompanies the distraction process. Distraction osteogenesis is particularly applicable to the correction of severe deformities of the mandible and midface in children with developmental hypoplasia and syndromic craniosynostosis. However, growth is an added variable in this patient population. The amount of overcorrection in lengthening of the hypoplastic bone required to compensate for continued growth discrepancy of the adjacent facial bones is difficult to predict. Therefore, the families of these patients should be informed that many children will require repeated operations at a later age as they reach skeletal maturity.     

Binderoid complete cleft lip/palate

A small subset of infants with complete cleft lip/palate look different because they have nasolabiomaxillary hypoplasia and orbital hypotelorism. The authors' purpose was to define the clinical and radiographic features of these patients and to comment on operative management, classification, and terminology. The authors reviewed 695 patients with all forms of incomplete and complete cleft lip/palate and identified 15 patients with nasolabiomaxillary hypoplasia and orbital hypotelorism. All 15 patients had complete labial clefting (5 percent of 320 patients with complete cleft lip/palate), equally divided between bilateral and unilateral forms. The female-to-male ratio was 2:1. Of the seven infants with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate, one had an intact secondary palate and all had a hypoplastic septum, small alar cartilages, narrow basilar columella, underdeveloped contralateral philtral ridge, ill-defined Cupid's bow, thin vermilion-mucosa on both sides of the cleft, and a diminutive premaxilla. Of the eight infants with bilateral complete cleft lip, one had an intact secondary palate. The features were the same as in patients with unilateral cleft, but with a more severely hypoplastic nasal tip, conical columella, tiny prolabium, underdeveloped lateral labial elements, and small/mobile premaxilla. Central midfacial hypoplasia and hypotelorism did not change during childhood and adolescence. Intermedial canthal measurements remained 1.5 SD below normal age-matched controls. Skeletal analysis (mean age, 10 years; range, 4 months to 19 years) documented maxillary retrusion (mean sagittal maxillomandibular discrepancy, 13.7 mm; range, 3 to 17 mm), absent anterior nasal spine, and a class III relationship. The mean sella nasion A point (S-N-A) angle of 74 degrees (range, 65 to 79 degrees) and sella nasion B point (S-N-B) angle of 81 degrees (range, 71 to 90 degrees) were significantly different from age-matched norms ( = 0.0007 and = 0.004, respectively). The ipsilateral central and lateral incisors were absent in all children with unilateral cleft, whereas a single-toothed premaxilla was typically found in the bilateral patients. Several modifications were necessary during primary nasolabial repair because of the diminutive bony and soft-tissue elements. All adolescent patients had Le Fort I maxillary advancement and construction of an adult nasal framework with costochondral or cranial graft. Other often-used procedures were bony augmentation of the anterior maxilla; cartilage grafts to the nasal tip and columella; and dermal grafting to the median tubercle, philtral ridge, and basal columella. Infants with complete unilateral or bilateral cleft lip/palate in association with nasolabiomaxillary hypoplasia and orbital hypotelorism do not belong on the holoprosencephalic spectrum because they have normal head circumference, stature, and intelligence, nor should they be referred to as having Binder anomaly. The authors propose the term cleft lip/palate for these children. Early recognition of this entity is important for counseling parents and because alterations in standard operative methods and orthodontic protocols are necessary.     

Primary definitive nasal correction in patients presenting for late unilateral cleft lip repair

Almost 25 percent of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients present with their deformity in their teens or later years in the developing world. Because more than 80 percent of the world population lives in the developing world, the established protocol for repair of these deformities is not applicable to these patients. Despite the magnitude, there are no significant reports in the literature that deal with this problem. Several issues need to be addressed, but the author limits himself here to the correction of the nasal deformity. The patients at this age are very much concerned with the aesthetic outcome. Procedures described hitherto for primary nasal correction in infants are not successful in restoring nasal shape and symmetry at this late age of presentation. Our experience with radical correction of secondary nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients presenting late prompted us to extend the concept by undertaking a definitive primary correction of the nasal deformity in cleft patients presenting late. Twenty-two patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity (nine male patients and 13 female patients) with ages ranging from 13 to 22 years, presenting between August of 1997 and December of 2000, are included in this study. Of these, 11 patients had a cleft of the lip alone, eight also had a cleft of the alveolus, and three had a cleft of the palate continuous with the cleft lip. All patients showed some maxillary hypoplasia. An external rhinoplasty with lip repair was carried out in all patients. The corrective procedures on the nose included columellar lengthening; augmentation along the pyriform margin, nasal floor, and alveolus using bone grafts; submucous resection of the nasal septum; repositioning of lower lateral cartilages; and augmentation of nasal dorsum by bone graft. Clinical follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months, and the median follow-up period was 13 months. Results have been very good, and much better than results seen earlier with other primary rhinoplasty techniques. While repairing unilateral cleft lip in adolescents, the author thinks it would be most appropriate to address the entire gamut of the deformity in a single stage, provide complete vector reorientation, and augment the hypoplastic elements by autologous tissue. It is not just the fear of poor follow-up, but that merely correcting the lip deformity in these patients without attempting definitive rhinoplasty, in the author's opinion, would be insufficient surgical intervention.     

The Le Fort III advancement osteotomy in the child under 7 years of age

This is a longitudinal study of 12 patients with craniofacial synostosis syndromes (Crouzon's, Apert's, Pfeiffer's) who underwent Le Fort III advancement under the age of 7 years (average age 5.1 years, range 4.0 to 6.7 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years and included clinical, dental, and cephalometric examinations according to a prescribed protocol. The study demonstrated that the procedure could be safely performed in the younger child with an acceptable level of morbidity. There was a remarkable degree of postoperative stability of the maxillary segment. However, although vertical (inferior) growth or movement of the midfacial segment was demonstrated, there was minimal, if any, anterior or horizontal growth. Any occlusal disharmony developing during the period of follow-up could be attributed to anticipated mandibular development and could be corrected by orthognathic surgery. The roles of surgical overcorrection and anterior-pull headgear therapy after release of intermaxillary fixation are also discussed. The Le Fort III osteotomy is justifiably indicated during early childhood for psychological and physiologic reasons.