DNA条形码技术在植物中的研究现状

DNA条形码技术（DNA barcoding）是用短的DNA片段对物种进行识别和鉴定的分子生物学技术。在动物研究中该技术已经成功应用于利用线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I（COI）进行物种鉴定和发现隐种或新物种。相对于动物, COI基因在高等植物中进化速率较慢, 因此植物条形码研究以叶绿体基因组作为重点, 但目前还处于寻找合适的基因片段阶段。许多学者对此进行了积极的探索, 报道了多种植物条形码的候选片段或组合, 但还没有获得满足所有标准的特征位点片段。该文介绍了DNA条形码的标准、优点、工作流程及数据分析方法, 总结了DNA条形码在植物中的研究现状。     

植物DNA条形码、物种形成和分类学

<正>DNA条形码最大的特点是用一段标准DNA序列就可以鉴定生物材料(特别是不具有分类特征的残缺或来自幼小个体的材料)和生物产品的物种来源(Hebert et al.,2003)。已有研究发现,动物中线粒体基因组的COI基因序列能鉴定多个动物类群的物种,被认为是理想的DNA条形码片段(Ward et al.,2005;TavaresBaker,2008)。而植物DNA条形码序列的确定还存在争议,例如应选择一个片段还是多     

藻类DNA条形码研究进展

DNA barcode,又称为DNA条形码,是指利用短的标准DNA序列的核苷酸多样性进行物种的鉴定和快速识别.目前该方法在动物分类研究中应用广泛,其中线粒体的细胞色素c氧化酶亚基1(cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1,COI或cox 1)基因中的约700bp长度的一段被用来作为标准DNA片段.在陆地植物条形码研究中,生命-植物条形码联盟会(Consortium for the Barcode of Life-Plant Working Group,CBOL-Plant Working Group)近期推荐将植物叶绿体中的两个基因片段rbcL+ matK作为初步的陆生植物条形码,此组合能在70％的程度上进行植物物种的鉴别.在海藻的分类研究中,DNA条形码的应用较少,已有的研究主要集中在硅藻、红藻和褐藻,尚没有学者明确提出适合藻类的DNA条形码.总结了能够作为藻类DNA条形码的序列特点、应用流程及分析方法,综述了DNA条形码在藻类中的研究现状和存在的问题,展望了藻类DNA条形码的应用前景.     

植物DNA条形码研究进展

DNA条形码(DNA barcoding)已成为近5年来国际上生物多样性研究的热点,即通过使用短的标准DNA片段,对物种进行快速、准确的识别和鉴定.该技术在动物研究中已得到广泛的应用,所采用的标准片段是线粒体COI基因中约650 bp长的一段.然而在植物中DNA条形码的研究进展相对缓慢,目前尚处于对所提议的各片段比较和评价阶段,还未获得一致的标准片段.由于植物中线粒体基因组进化速率较慢,因此条形码片段主要在叶绿体基因组上进行选择,被提议的编码基因片段主要有rpoB,rpoCI,matK,rbcL,UPA,非编码区片段有tmH-psbA,atpF-atpH,psbK-psbI,此外还有核基因ITS.已有的研究表明以上任何一个单片段都不足以区分所有植物物种,因而不同的研究组相继提出了不同的片段组合方案,目前被广泛讨论的组合主要有5种.本文综述了DNA条形码序列的优点、标准、工作流程、分析方法和存在的争议,重点论述了植物条形码研究中被提议的各序列片段和组合的研究现状.     

植物DNA条形码在系统发育研究中的应用

<正>1常用植物DNA条形码物种的准确鉴定是开展科学研究和生物多样性保护的先决条件,但根据形态学特征进行物种鉴定对非专业人员而言比较困难。即使是专业人员,面对纷繁复杂的物种,要想逐一鉴定也难以实现。DNA条形码技术(DNA barcoding)为物种的快速、准确鉴定提供了可能(Hebert et al.,2003)。线粒体COI基因作为动物的DNA条形码已得到广泛应用。但对     

真菌DNA条形码研究进展

DNA条形码（DNA barcode）是通过一段短的标准DNA片段实现物种的快速、准确和标准化鉴定。线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶亚基I（COI）基因作为动物的DNA条形码已广泛应用于物种鉴定中,在植物上已选定叶绿体rbcL和matK基因作为基本的DNA条形码。目前世界各国真菌学家正对不同的真菌类群进行不同基因片段的筛选与评价,并在第四届国际生命条形码大会上正式推荐了ITS作为真菌的首选DNA条形码。对国内外真菌DNA条形码的研究进展进行总结与分析,并展望真菌DNA条形码的应用前景。     

药用植物DNA条形码鉴定研究进展

DNA条形码是利用相对较短的标准DNA片段对物种进行快速准确鉴定的一门技术。DNA条形码技术可以从分子水平弥补传统鉴定方法的一些不足。该技术具有良好的通用性,使得物种鉴定过程更加快速,已经广泛应用于动物物种的鉴定研究中。近年来,随着药用植物DNA条形码鉴定研究的快速发展,逐渐形成了药用植物和植物源中药材鉴定的完善体系。本文综述了DNA条形码技术鉴定药用植物的原理,介绍了中草药传统鉴定方法及其缺陷、使用DNA条形码技术鉴定植物源药材的意义以及DNA条形码在药用植物鉴定中的应用,对其应用前景进行了展望。     

植物DNA条形码技术的发展及应用

在对DNA条形码技术的发展过程进行归纳分析的基础上,对植物DNA条形码技术的研究进展、工作流程及分析方法、影响其鉴定准确性的因素及其在植物分类学研究中的应用现状及存在的争议进行了综合分析和阐述,并展望了植物DNA条形码技术的发展趋势及应用前景。通过具体实例说明将植物DNA条形码技术与传统植物学知识相结合可作为民族植物学的研究手段之一。认为:目前常用的植物DNA条形码主要有单一片段和多片段组合2种方式,这2种方式各有优缺点;常用的DNA序列有matK、trnH-psbA、rbcL和ITS等,但均有一定的局限性;针对不同的使用目的,应选择不同的植物DNA条形码标准;影响植物DNA条形码鉴定准确性的因素包括物种的类型和数量、系统树构建方法、杂交/基因渗入、物种起源时间的差异、分子进化速率差异等;当前植物DNA条形码研究工作的重点是选择合适的DNA片段并对其进行评价。     

地黄属植物的DNA条形码研究

地黄属(Rehmannia)为玄参科(Scrophulariaceae)药用植物,广泛分布于中国中东部及北部地区。由于地黄属植物经历了快速成种,导致其属内物种间形态性状差异较小,运用传统的形态学分类方法已难以准确地鉴定物种,近年来迅速发展起来的DNA条形码技术为快速、准确地鉴别物种提供了新思路。本研究选用3个叶绿体DNA非编码区片段(trn L-trn F、trn M-trn V和trn S-trn G)及核基因ITS片段,运用PWG-distance和TreeBuilding两种方法对地黄属5个物种75个个体进行了DNA条形码分析。结果表明:单个叶绿体DNA片段或核基因ITS片段对地黄属物种的鉴别率较低(0%~20%),组合的叶绿体DNA片段分辨能力虽然高于单个DNA片段,但并不能将地黄属5个物种完全区分开;trn S-trn G+ITS片段组合的分辨率可达100%,能够将地黄属5个物种准确区分,与所有叶绿体DNA片段和核基因ITS片段组合(trn L-trn F+trn M-trn V+trn S-trn G+ITS)的辨别率相同,因此推荐trn S-trn G+ITS作为地黄属植物的标准条形码。此外,利用DNA条形码鉴别物种时,可采用叶绿体DNA片段和核DNA片段组合的方法来提高物种鉴定的成功率。     

关于植物DNA条形码研究技术规范

DNA条形码是利用标准的基因片段对物种进行快速鉴定的技术,已经成功用于生物物种分类和鉴定、生态学调查和生物多样性评估等研究领域。尽管生命条形码数据（BOLD）系统提供了主要针对动物类群DNA条形码研究的技术规范,但由于植物本身的生物学特性与所使用的条形码不同,因此已有技术规范并不完全适用于植物DNA条形码的研究。本文根据植物DNA条形码研究的特点与我国的实际情况,编写了植物DNA条形码研究技术标准和规范指南,具体包括十个方面的内容,即植物DNA条形码研究的样品采集策略;植物标本和野外数据的采集规范;植物标本图像信息的采集规范;植物DNA材料的采集规范;植物DNA材料的干燥与保存规范;植物总DNA的质量标准及保存规范;植物标准DNA条形码的选择与通用引物;DNA条形码的扩增与测序;DNA条形码数据的命名、编辑和提交规范;以及DNA条形码数据分析。我们期望通过这些标准规范的实施和在实践中的不断修订和完善,能为我国学者开展植物DNA条形码和iFlora研究提供参考和借鉴。
关键词：植物DNA条形码;技术规范;物种鉴定;标准;新一代植物志     

Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification

Chloroplast DNA sequence data are a versatile tool for plant identification or barcoding and establishing genetic relationships among plant species. Different chloroplast loci have been utilized for use at close and distant evolutionary distances in plants, and no single locus has been identified that can distinguish between all plant species. Advances in DNA sequencing technology are providing new cost‐effective options for genome comparisons on a much larger scale. Universal PCR amplification of chloroplast sequences or isolation of pure chloroplast fractions, however, are non‐trivial. We now propose the analysis of chloroplast genome sequences from massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of total DNA as a simple and cost‐effective option for plant barcoding, and analysis of plant relationships to guide gene discovery for biotechnology. We present chloroplast genome sequences of five grass species derived from MPS of total DNA. These data accurately established the phylogenetic relationships between the species, correcting an apparent error in the published rice sequence. The chloroplast genome may be the elusive single‐locus DNA barcode for plants.     

Molecular identification of species in Juglandaceae:A tiered method

DNA barcoding is a method of species identification and recognition using DNA sequence data. A tiered or multilocus method has been recommended for barcoding plant species. In this study, we sampled 196 individuals representing 9 genera and 54 species of Juglandaceae to investigate the utility of the four potential barcoding loci (rbcL, matK, trnH-psbA, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS)). Our results show that all four DNA regions are easy to amplify and sequence. In the four tested DNA regions, ITS has the most variable information, and rbcL has the least. At generic level, seven of nine genera can be efficiently identified by matK. At species level, ITS has higher interspecific p-distance than the trnH-psbA region. Difficult to align in the whole family, ITS showed heterogeneous variability among different genera. Except for the monotypic genera (Cyclocarya, Annamocarya, Platycarya), ITS appeared to have limited power for species identification within the Carya and Engelhardia complex, and have no power for Juglans or Pterocarya. Overall, our results confirmed that a multilocus tiered method for plant barcoding was applicable and practicable. With higher priority, matK is proposed as the first-tier DNA region for genus discrimination, and the second locus at species level should have enough stable variable characters.     

A test of seven candidate barcode regions from the plastome in Picea (Pinaceae)

DNA barcoding, as a tool for species discrimination, has been used efficiently in animals, algae and fungi, but there are still debates on which DNA region(s) can be used as the standard barcode(s) for land plants. Gymnosperms, especially conifers, are important components of forests, and there is an urgent need for them to be identified through DNA barcoding because of their high frequency of collection in the field. However, the feasibility of DNA barcoding in gymnosperms has not been examined based on a dense species sampling. Here we selected seven candidate DNA barcodes from the plastome (matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, atpF-atpH, psbA-trnH, and psbK-psbI) to evaluate their suitability in Picea (spruce). The results showed that none of them or their different combinations has sufficient resolution for spruce species, although matK+rbcL might be used as a two-locus barcode. The low efficiency of these candidate barcodes in Picea might be caused by the paternal inheritance of the chloroplast genome, long generation time, recent radiation, and frequent inter-specific hybridization aided by wind pollination. Some of these factors could also be responsible for the difficulties in barcoding other plant groups. Furthermore, the potential of the nuclear LEAFY gene as a land plant barcode was discussed.     

Molecular identification of species in Juglandaceae: A tiered method

DNA barcoding is a method of species identification and recognition using DNA sequence data. A tiered or multilocus method has been recommended for barcoding plant species. In this study, we sampled 196 individuals representing 9 genera and 54 species of Juglandaceae to investigate the utility of the four potential barcoding loci (rbcL, matK, trnH-psbA, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS)). Our results show that all four DNA regions are easy to amplify and sequence. In the four tested DNA regions, ITS has the most variable information, and rbcL has the least. At generic level, seven of nine genera can be efficiently identified by matK. At species level, ITS has higher interspecific p-distance than the trnH-psbA region. Difficult to align in the whole family, ITS showed heterogeneous variability among different genera. Except for the monotypic genera (Cyclocarya, Annamocarya, Platycarya), ITS appeared to have limited power for species identification within the Carya and Engelhardia complex, and have no power for Juglans or Pterocarya. Overall, our results confirmed that a multilocus tiered method for plant barcoding was applicable and practicable. With higher priority, matK is proposed as the first-tier DNA region for genus discrimination, and the second locus at species level should have enough stable variable characters.     

Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome

DNA barcoding is currently a widely used and effective tool that enables rapid and accurate identification of plant species; however, none of the available loci work across all species. Because single‐locus DNA barcodes lack adequate variations in closely related taxa, recent barcoding studies have placed high emphasis on the use of whole‐chloroplast genome sequences which are now more readily available as a consequence of improving sequencing technologies. While chloroplast genome sequencing can already deliver a reliable barcode for accurate plant identification it is not yet resource‐effective and does not yet offer the speed of analysis provided by single‐locus barcodes to unspecialized laboratory facilities. Here, we review the development of candidate barcodes and discuss the feasibility of using the chloroplast genome as a super‐barcode. We advocate a new approach for DNA barcoding that, for selected groups of taxa, combines the best use of single‐locus barcodes and super‐barcodes for efficient plant identification. Specific barcodes might enhance our ability to distinguish closely related plants at the species and population levels.     

DNA barcoding is a new approach in comparative genomics of plants

DNA barcoding was proposed as a method for recognition and identification of eukaryotic species through comparison of sequences of a standard short DNA fragment—DNA barcode—from an unknown specimen to a library of reference sequences from known species. This allows identifying an organism at any stage of development from a very small tissue sample, fresh or conserved many years ago. Molecular identification of plant samples can be used in various scientific and applied fields. It would also help to find new species, which is particularly important for cryptogamic plants. An optimal DNA barcode region is a small fragment presented in all species of a major taxonomic group, having invariable nucleotide sequence in all members of the same species, but with sufficient variation to discriminate among the species. This fragment should be flanked by low-variable regions for use of universal primers in PCR for amplification and sequencing. The DNA barcode that is well established in animals is a sequence of a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase gene CO1. However, searching for DNA barcode in plants proved to be a more challenging task. No DNA region universally suitable for all plants and meeting all of the necessary criteria has been found. Apparently, a multilocus or two-stage approach should be applied for this purpose. Several fragments of the chloroplast genome (trnH-psbA, matK, rpoC, rpoB, rbcL) in combinations of two or three regions were suggested as candidate regions with highest potential, but more representative samples should be examined to choose the best candidate. The possibility is discussed to use as DNA barcode internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear rRNA genes, which are highly variable, widely employed in molecular phylogenetic studies at the species level, but also have some limitations.     

Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae

The concept and practice of DNA barcoding have been designed as a system to facilitate species identification and recognition. The primary challenge for barcoding plants has been to identify a suitable region on which to focus the effort. The slow relative nucleotide substitution rates of plant mitochondria and the technical issues with the use of nuclear regions have focused attention on several proposed regions in the plastid genome. One of the challenges for barcoding is to discriminate closely related or recently evolved species. The Myristicaceae, or nutmeg family, is an older group within the angiosperms that contains some recently evolved species providing a challenging test for barcoding plants. The goal of this study is to determine the relative utility of six coding (Universal Plastid Amplicon - UPA, rpoB, rpoc1, accD, rbcL, matK) and one noncoding (trnH-psbA) chloroplast loci for barcoding in the genus Compsoneura using both single region and multiregion approaches. Five of the regions we tested were predominantly invariant across species (UPA, rpoB, rpoC1, accD, rbcL). Two of the regions (matK and trnH-psbA) had significant variation and show promise for barcoding in nutmegs. We demonstrate that a two-gene approach utilizing a moderately variable region (matK) and a more variable region (trnH-psbA) provides resolution among all the Compsonuera species we sampled including the recently evolved C. sprucei and C. mexicana. Our classification analyses based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination, suggest that the use of two regions results in a decreased range of intraspecific variation relative to the distribution of interspecific divergence with 95% of the samples correctly identified in a sequence identification analysis.