Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer.

To investigate the role of the A protein-binding sites at the Mu ends in the DNA strand transfer reaction, we constructed mutant mini-Mu molecules in which these sites were deleted (L3 or R3) or substituted (L2 or R2) to conserve the spacing arrangements at the adjacent sites. The single site mutants are poor substrates for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the Mu ends in Type 1 reactions in the absence of Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF). Addition of IHF to the reaction stimulates Type 1 cleavage more than 10 times for the delta-R3, delta-L3, S-L2 mutants and more than five times in the case of the S-R2 mutant under alternate conditions. The site of IHF stimulation resides within the transpositional enhancer which implicates the end-binding sites L2, L3, R2, and R3 in interactions with the enhancer. At least two of the L2, L3, and R3 sites are required for proficient reaction in the presence of IHF. By combining the single site mutants with O1 or O2 partially deleted enhancer elements, we have tentatively localized some of the interactions to each side of the functional enhancer revealing a complex circuit of end-enhancer interactions. The R3 site is suggested to be involved in interactions only with O2 and the L3 site only with O1. The data also suggest the possibility that L2 and R2 may be involved in interactions with both O1 and O2. Finally, our working model predicts that the L3-O1 and R3-O2 interactions may be required contacts for discriminating between the Mu left and right ends in transpososome formation.     

Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria—mini review

The advantages of phage Mu transposition-based systems for the chromosomal editing of plasmid-less strains are reviewed. The cis and trans requirements for Mu phage-mediated transposition, which include the L/R ends of the Mu DNA, the transposition factors MuA and MuB, and the cis/trans functioning of the E element as an enhancer, are presented. Mini-Mu(LR)/(LER) units are Mu derivatives that lack most of the Mu genes but contain the L/R ends or a properly arranged E element in cis to the L/R ends. The dual-component system, which consists of an integrative plasmid with a mini-Mu and an easily eliminated helper plasmid encoding inducible transposition factors, is described in detail as a tool for the integration/amplification of recombinant DNAs. This chromosomal editing method is based on replicative transposition through the formation of a cointegrate that can be resolved in a recombination-dependent manner. (E-plus)- or (E-minus)-helpers that differ in the presence of the trans-acting E element are used to achieve the proper mini-Mu transposition intensity. The systems that have been developed for the construction of stably maintained mini-Mu multi-integrant strains of Escherichia coli and Methylophilus methylotrophus are described. A novel integration/amplification/fixation strategy is proposed for consecutive independent replicative transpositions of different mini-Mu(LER) units with “excisable” E elements in methylotrophic cells.     

Inhibition of bacteriophage Mu transposition by Mu repressor and Fis

In this paper we show that the Escherichia coli protein Fis has a regulatory function in Mu transposition in the presence of Mu repressor. Fis can lower the transposition frequency of a mini-Mu 3–80-fold, but only if the Mu repressor is expressed simultaneously. In this novel type of regulation of transposition by the concerted action of Fis and repressor, the IAS, the internal activating sequence, is also involved as deletion of this site leads to the loss of the Fis effect. As the IAS contains strong repressor binding sites these are probably the target for the repressor in the observed negative regulation by Fis and repressor. However, the role of Fis and repressor is not only to inactivate the IAS, since a 4bp insertion in the IAS, which changes the spacing of the repressor-binding site, abolishes the enhancing function of the IAS but leaves the repressor-Fis effect intact. A likely target for Fis in this regulation is a strong Fis-binding site, which is located adjacent to the L2 transposase-binding site. However, when this Fis-binding sequence was substituted by a random sequence and Fis no longer showed specific binding to this site, the Fis effect was still observed. Although it is still possible that Fis can function by binding to this non-specific site in a particular complex, it seems more likely that Fis is directly or indirectly involved in determining the level of the repressor.     

Simultaneous expression of a bacteriophage Mu transposase and repressor: a way of preventing killing due to mini-Mu replication

In vitro studies of bacteriophage Mu transposition have shown that the phage-encoded transposase and repressor bind the same sequences on the phage genome. We attempted to test that prediction in vivo and found that Mu repressor directly inhibits transposition. We also found that, in the absence of repressor, constitutive expression of Mu transposition functions pA and pB is lethal in Escherichia coli strains lysogenic for a mini-Mu and that this is the result of intensive replication of the mini-Mu. These findings have important consequences where such mini-Mus are used as genetic tools. We also tested whether in Erwinia chrysanthemi the effect of transposition functions on a resident mini-Mu was the same as in E. coli. We observed that expression of pA alone was lethal in E. chrysanthemi and that a large fraction of the survivors underwent precise excision of the mini-Mu.     

Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB.

Initiation of phage Mu DNA transposition requires assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes called Mu transpososomes containing the two Mu DNA ends and MuA transposase tetramer. Mu transpososome assembly is highly regulated and involves multiple DNA sites for transposase binding, including a transpositional enhancer called the internal activation sequence (IAS). In addition, a number of protein cofactors participate, including the target DNA activator MuB ATPase. We investigated the impact of the assembly cofactors on the kinetics of transpososome assembly with the aim of deciphering the reaction steps that are influenced by the cofactors. The transpositional enhancer IAS appears to have little impact on the initial pairing of the two Mu end segments bound by MuA. Instead, it accelerates the post-synaptic conformational step(s) that converts the reversible complex to the stable transpososome. The transpososome assembly stimulation by MuB does not require its stable DNA binding activity, which appears critical for directing transposition to sites distant from the donor transposon.     

Transposition studies of mini-Mu plasmids constructed from the chemically synthesized ends of bacteriophage Mu

We describe below the chemical synthesis of the right and left ends of bacteriophage Mu and characterize the activity of these synthetic ends in mini-Mu transposition. Mini-Mu plasmids were constructed which carry the synthetic Mu ends together with the Mu A and B genes under control of the bacteriophage λ p_L promoter. Derepression of p_L leads to a high frequency of mini-Mu transposition (5.6 × 10⁻²) which is dependent on the presence of the Mu ends and the Mu A and B proteins. Five deletion mutants in the Mu ends were tested in the mini-Mu transposition system and their effects on transposition are described.     

Interactions of phage Mu enhancer and termini that specify the assembly of a topologically unique interwrapped transpososome

The higher-order DNA-protein complex that carries out the chemical steps of phage Mu transposition is organized by bridging interactions among three DNA sites, the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu, and an enhancer element (E), mediated by the transposase protein MuA. A subset of the six subunits of MuA associated with their cognate sub-sites at L and R communicate with the enhancer to trigger the stepwise assembly of the functional transpososome. The DNA follows a well-defined path within the transpososome, trapping five supercoil nodes comprising two E-R crossings, one E-L crossing and two L-R crossings. The enhancer is a critical DNA element in specifying the unique interwrapped topology of the three-site LER synapse. In this study, we used multiple strategies to characterize Mu end-enhancer interactions to extend, modify and refine those inferred from earlier analyses. Directed placement of transposase subunits at their cognate sub-sites at L and R, analysis of the protein composition of transpososomes thus obtained, and their characterization using topological methods define the following interactions. R1-E interaction is essential to promote transpososome assembly, R3-E interaction contributes to the native topology of the transpososome, and L1-E and R2-E interactions are not required for assembly. The data on L2-E and L3-E interactions are not unequivocal. If they do occur, either one is sufficient to support the assembly process. Our results are consistent with two R-E and perhaps one L-E, being responsible for the three DNA crossings between the enhancer and the left and right ends of Mu. A 3D representation of the interwrapped complex (IW) obtained by modeling is consistent with these results. The model reveals straightforward geometric and topological relationships between the IW complex and a more relaxed enhancer-independent V-form of the transpososome assembled under altered reaction conditions.     

Flanking host sequences can exert an inhibitory effect on the cleavage step of the in vitro mu DNA strand transfer reaction.

The effect of flanking host sequences on the cleavage step of the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction was investigated. Insertion of a mini-Mu molecule into certain sites in pUC19 results in insertions that demonstrate a decreased ability to form Type 1 complexes in subsequent rounds of transposition. Similarly, changes in the flanking host sequences directly adjacent to the Mu ends by in vitro mutagenesis can also result in Type 1-deficient mini-Mu molecules. Further examination of the inhibition revealed that Type 1 deficient mini-Mu molecules are capable of forming uncut synaptic complexes at normal levels but are compromised in their ability to serve as substrates for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the Mu ends. This cleavage defect can be overcome by addition of the Mu B protein and ATP to the reaction. Our data suggest that one of the roles of the B protein may be to provide a mechanism whereby Mu prophages with inhibitory flanking sequences can overcome this obstacle and avoid being trapped at unproductive locations.     

Criss-crossed interactions between the enhancer and the att sites of phage Mu during DNA transposition.

A bipartite enhancer sequence (composed of the O1 and O2 operator sites) is essential for assembly of the functional tetramer of phage Mu transposase (MuA) on supercoiled DNA substrates. A three-site interaction (LER) between the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu (att sites) and the enhancer (E) precedes tetramer assembly. We have dissected the role of the enhancer in tetramer assembly by using two transposase proteins that have a common att site specificity, but are distinct in their enhancer specificity. The activity of these proteins on substrates containing hybrid enhancers reveals a 'criss-crossed' pattern of interaction between att and enhancer sites. The left operator, O1, of the enhancer interacts specifically with the transposase subunit at the R1 site (within the right att sequence) that is responsible for cleaving the left end of Mu. The right operator, O2, shows a preferential interaction with the transposase subunit at the L1 site (within the left att sequence) that is responsible for cleaving the right end of Mu.     

Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome.

The Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction proceeds via two stable higher order nucleoprotein complexes, the Type 1 and Type 2 transpososomes. The Mu A protein is responsible for the structural and functional integrity of the Type 1 transpososome. We have investigated the quaternary structure of the Mu A protein within this complex by chemical cross-linking experiments and found that the basic structural unit is an A tetramer. Three Mu A binding sites in the transpososome are protected by DNase I footprinting: the outermost A binding sites L1 and R1, as well as R2. Genetic evidence is also presented which corroborates this result. Efficient formation of Type 1 complexes occurs in mini-Mus with the L3 or R3 sites deleted or when the L2 site has been substituted; but no reaction occurs in the absence of R2. The protection at the L1 and R1 sites extends 12-13 bp beyond the Mu-host junctions as seen by DNase I and methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II) [MPE.Fe(II)] foot-printing, indicating Mu A contacts with the flanking host sequences in the transpososome but not on linear DNA; furthermore, hydroxyl radical footprinting shows an unprecedentedly large enhancement on the continuous strand, 2 bp beyond the nick site outside the Mu right end, which suggests that an altered DNA structure is induced upon Type 1 complex formation.     

Analysis of the ends of bacteriophage Mu using site-directed mutagenesis

We showed previously that two regions at the left end (L1 and L3) and one at the right end (R2) of bacteriophage Mu are essential for transposition. These regions all contain a 22 base-pair sequence with the consensus YGtTTCAYtNNAARYRCGAAAR, where Y and R represent any pyrimidine and purine, respectively. The Mu A protein binds to these regions in vitro, and weakly to sequences between nucleotides 1 and 30 of the right end (R1) and between nucleotides 110 and 135 of the left end (L2). These weak A binding sites contain the sequence AARYRCGAAAR. Here we show, using site-directed mutagenesis, that the weak A binding sites are essential for transposition. Mutations in these weak A binding sites have a greater effect on transposition than mutations of corresponding base-pairs in the stronger A binding sites, located adjacent to these weak A binding sites. We confirm the importance of several of the conserved base-pairs in the consensus sequence YGtTTCAYtNNAARYRCGAAAR. The base-pairs in the A binding sites that are shown to be essential for transposition are all conserved in the ends of the related bacteriophage D108. Furthermore, it is shown that the distance of 90 base-pairs between the two regions at the left end (L1 and L2L3) is essential.     

The Mu enhancer is functionally asymmetric both in cis and in trans. Topological selectivity of Mu transposition is enhancer-independent

Mu DNA transposition from a negatively supercoiled DNA substrate requires interaction of an enhancer element with the left (attL) and right (attR) ends of Mu. The orientation of the L and R ends with respect to each other (inverted) and with respect to the enhancer is normally inviolate. We show that when the enhancer is provided in trans as a linear fragment, the head to head orientation of the L/R ends is still required. Each functional half of the linear enhancer maintains the same "cross-wise" interaction with the subsites L1 and R1, when present in cis or in trans. In reactions catalyzed by an enhancer-independent variant of the Mu transposase, the need for negative supercoiling of the substrate and the inverted orientation of L and R ends is not relaxed. These results show that the orientation specificity of the enhancer is not determined by its topological linkage to the Mu ends. There is a functional asymmetry inherent to the enhancer. Furthermore, the enhancer does not directly impose topological constraints on the transposition reaction or specify the reactive orientation of the Mu ends.     

Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA.

Interactions between the Mu A and Mu B proteins are important in the early steps of the in vitro transposition of a mini-Mu plasmid. We have examined these interactions by assaying Mu B stimulation of Mu A-mediated strand cleavage and strand transfer reactions. We have previously shown that in the presence of ATP the Mu B protein can stimulate the Mu A-directed cleavage reaction of mini-Mu plasmids carrying a terminal base pair mutation (Surette, M.G., Harkness, T., and Chaconas, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3118-3124). Here we demonstrate that in the absence of a non-Mu DNA target molecule the Mu B protein stimulates intramolecular integration of a mini-Mu in an ATP-dependent fashion. Furthermore, modification of the Mu B protein with N-ethylmaleimide severely compromises the ability of B to form a stable complex with DNA; however, the modified protein stimulates the strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions as efficiently as the untreated protein. These results indicate that the Mu B protein is capable of stimulating the Mu A protein through direct interaction in the absence of stable Mu B-DNA complex formation. Our results increase the spectrum of Mu B protein activities and uncouple the stimulatory properties of the Mu B protein from stable DNA binding but not the ATP cofactor requirement.     

The isolation and characteristics of plasmids derived from the insertion of MupAp1 into pML2: their behavior during transposition

Three independent insertions of the phage Mu variant MupAp1 into the ColE1 derivative pML2 have been isolated. From one of these hybrid plasmids (pSU1), two mini-Mu plasmids have been generated. These have lost internal regions of the Mu genome but retain the ends of the prophage. In pSU17 all but one kilobase pair of the early region and most of the late region have been deleted whereas in pSU123 most of the early region is still present but the deletion covers nearly all the late region. Mu immunity, host killing, and transposition functions are located in the DNA present in pSU123 but absent from pSU17. Transposition of Mu and the mini-Mu from the hybrid plasmids to the sex factor R388 is usually associated with the formation of cointegrates between the two parental plasmids.     

Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation

Phage Mu transposition is initiated by the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, which generates a branched DNA structure that acts as a transposition intermediate. A critical step in this reaction is formation of a special synaptic DNA-protein complex called a plectosome. We find that formation of this complex involves, in addition to a pair of Mu end sequences, a third cis-acting sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The IAS is specifically recognized by the N-terminal domain of Mu transposase (MuA protein). Neither the N-terminal domain of MuA protein nor the IAS is required for later reaction steps. The IAS overlaps with the sequences to which Mu repressor protein binds in the Mu operator region; the Mu repressor directly inhibits the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction by interfering with the interaction between MuA protein and the IAS, providing an additional mode of regulation by the repressor.     

Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

We have examined the effects of a T----C point mutation at the terminal nucleotide of the Mu ends in a mini-Mu plasmid on the early steps in the in vitro transposition reaction. These mutations inhibit the introduction of nicks at the Mu ends in a reaction with Mu A, HU, and integration host factor proteins. The presence of the point mutation at either the left end or the right end is sufficient to block the nicking reaction at both ends, indicating that the reaction is normally concerted. Addition of Mu B and ATP, however, dramatically stimulates the reaction of mutant mini-Mu plasmids carrying the mutation at one end but not at both ends. The data suggest that the Mu B protein mediates its effect through direct interaction with Mu A and that Mu B may play a role in an earlier step in the transposition process than previously proposed. In the presence of Mu B, two products are observed with the left end or right end mutant mini-Mu plasmids, a normal protein-DNA intermediate (Type 1 complex) which contains nicks at both Mu ends and an abortive product composed of free relaxed plasmid which is nicked only at the wild-type end. Furthermore, stable protein-DNA complexes characteristic of the first step in the in vitro transposition reaction are not observed in the absence of nicking or when only one end is a nicked; the introduction of nicks at both Mu ends is a prerequisite for stable transpososome assembly.     

The Mu transposase interwraps distant DNA sites within a functional transpososome in the absence of DNA supercoiling

A Mu transpososome assembled on negatively supercoiled DNA traps five supercoils by intertwining the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu with an enhancer element (E). To investigate the contribution of DNA supercoiling to this elaborate synapse in which E and L cross once, E and R twice, and L and R twice, we have analyzed DNA crossings in a transpososome assembled on nicked substrates under conditions that bypass the supercoiling requirement for transposition. We find that the transposase MuA can recreate an essentially similar topology on nicked substrates, interwrapping both E-R and L-R twice but being unable to generate the single E-L crossing. In addition, we deduce that the functional MuA tetramer must contribute to three of the four observed crossings and, thus, to restraining the enhancer within the complex. We discuss the contribution of both MuA and DNA supercoiling to the 5-noded Mu synapse built at the 3-way junction.     

Mini-Mu transduction: cis-inhibition of the insertion of Mud transposons

Mud (mini-Mu) transposons are defective phage Mu genomes that conserve the Mu ends. The transduction of Mud transposons is strictly dependent on Mu complementation, inefficient, and affected by modifications in the Mud internal sequences. The transduction of Mud transposons depends on transposition, which appears to be low, relative to wild-type Mu. Insertions of Mud into a plasmid can be frequently recovered among transductants; new Mud insertions into plasmids that already have both Mu ends, or just one, are rarely found. This suggests that the presence of Mu ends "immunizes" the plasmid against further insertion. This phenomenon may be similar to the transposition immunity of Tn3.     

Transposition immunity in bacteriophage Mu. The effect of a mutation at the kil gene on the establishment of immunity

Bacteriophage Mu is characterized by a phenomenon similar to the transposition immunity of TnA: the frequency of transposition of Mu or mini-Mu into plasmids containing certain phage sequences is reduced by two orders of magnitude. In order to lend transposition immunity to Mu, the recipient replicon must contain a sequence of phage DNA including a 5.1 kb early region from the c-end of Mu. The product of the kil (or cim) gene takes part in establishing the immunity. The transposition immunity of Mu is connected with the disturbance of cointegrate formation.     

Mutational analysis of the att DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase.

The transposase (A protein) of phage Mu encodes binding to two families of DNA sites, att sites located at the Mu ends and enhancer sites located internally. Separate subdomains in the N-terminal domain I of Mu A protein are known to be involved in recognition of the att and enhancer sites. We have delineated an approximately 135 aa region within domain I beta gamma that specifies binding to Mu att sites. This peptide was overexpressed and its properties compared with that of the larger domain I beta gamma as well as the intact Mu A protein. Extensive mutagenesis of residues around a putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif within the I beta domain identified several mutants defective in DNA transposition in vivo. Of these, Mu A(K157Q) was completely defective in att DNA-binding. Mu A(F131S) and Mu A(R146N) had a lower affinity for att DNA and low levels of transposition in vitro. Our results indicate that residues in the gamma region are required for activity and that residues outside the beta gamma region must also influence discrimination between the multiple att sites.