E2~Ub conjugates regulate the kinase activity of Shigella effector OspG during pathogenesis

Pathogenic bacteria introduce effector proteins directly into the cytosol of eukaryotic cells to promote invasion and colonization. OspG, a Shigella spp. effector kinase, plays a role in this process by helping to suppress the host inflammatory response. OspG has been reported to bind host E2 ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes activated with ubiquitin (E2~Ub), a key enzyme complex in ubiquitin transfer pathways. A co‐crystal structure of the OspG/UbcH5c~Ub complex reveals that complex formation has important ramifications for the activity of both OspG and the UbcH5c~Ub conjugate. OspG is a minimal kinase domain containing only essential elements required for catalysis. UbcH5c~Ub binding stabilizes an active conformation of the kinase, greatly enhancing OspG kinase activity. In contrast, interaction with OspG stabilizes an extended, less reactive form of UbcH5c~Ub. Recognizing conserved E2 features, OspG can interact with at least ten distinct human E2s~Ub. Mouse oral infection studies indicate that E2~Ub conjugates act as novel regulators of OspG effector kinase function in eukaryotic host cells.     

E2 conjugating enzyme selectivity and requirements for function of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP

The transfer of ubiquitin (Ub) to a substrate protein requires a cascade of E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligating enzymes. E3 Ub ligases containing U-box and RING domains bind both E2～Ub conjugates and substrates to facilitate transfer of the Ub molecule. Although the overall mode of action of E3 ligases is well established, many of the mechanistic details that determine the outcome of ubiquitination are poorly understood. CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein) is a U-box E3 ligase that serves as a co-chaperone to heat shock proteins and is critical for the regulation of unfolded proteins in the cytosol. We have performed a systematic analysis of the interactions of CHIP with E2 conjugating enzymes and found that only a subset bind and function. Moreover, some E2 enzymes function in pairs to create products that neither create individually. Characterization of the products of these reactions showed that different E2 enzymes produce different ubiquitination products, i.e. that E2 determines the outcome of Ub transfer. Site-directed mutagenesis on the E2 enzymes Ube2D1 and Ube2L3 (UbcH5a and UbcH7) established that an SPA motif in loop 7 of E2 is required for binding to CHIP but is not sufficient for activation of the E2～Ub conjugate and consequent ubiquitination activity. These data support the proposal that the E2 SPA motif provides specificity for binding to CHIP, whereas activation of the E2～Ub conjugate is derived from other molecular determinants.     

Ubiquitin in motion: structural studies of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme∼ubiquitin conjugate

Ubiquitination of proteins provides a powerful and versatile post-translational signal in the eukaryotic cell. The formation of a thioester bond between ubiquitin (Ub) and the active site of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) is critical for the transfer of Ub to substrates. Assembly of a functional ubiquitin ligase (E3) complex poised for Ub transfer involves recognition and binding of an E2～Ub conjugate. Therefore, full characterization of the structure and dynamics of E2～Ub conjugates is required for further mechanistic understanding of Ub transfer reactions. Here we present characterization of the dynamic behavior of E2～Ub conjugates of two human enzymes, UbcH5c～Ub and Ubc13～Ub, in solution as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance and small-angle X-ray scattering. Within each conjugate, Ub retains great flexibility with respect to the E2, indicative of highly dynamic species that adopt manifold orientations. The population distribution of Ub conformations is dictated by the identity of the E2: the UbcH5c～Ub conjugate populates an array of extended conformations, and the population of Ubc13～Ub conjugates favors a closed conformation in which the hydrophobic surface of Ub faces helix 2 of Ubc13. We propose that the varied conformations adopted by Ub represent available binding modes of the E2～Ub species and thus provide insight into the diverse E2～Ub protein interactome, particularly with regard to interaction with Ub ligases.     

A UbcH5/ubiquitin noncovalent complex is required for processive BRCA1-directed ubiquitination

Protein ubiquitination is a powerful regulatory modification that influences nearly every aspect of eukaryotic cell biology. The general pathway for ubiquitin (Ub) modification requires the sequential activities of a Ub-activating enzyme (E1), a Ub transfer enzyme (E2), and a Ub ligase (E3). The E2 must recognize both the E1 and a cognate E3 in addition to carrying activated Ub. These central functions are performed by a topologically conserved alpha/beta-fold core domain of approximately 150 residues shared by all E2s. However, as presented herein, the UbcH5 family of E2s can also bind Ub noncovalently on a surface well removed from the E2 active site. We present the solution structure of the UbcH5c/Ub noncovalent complex and demonstrate that this noncovalent interaction permits self-assembly of activated UbcH5c approximately Ub molecules. Self-assembly has profound consequences for the processive formation of polyubiquitin (poly-Ub) chains in ubiquitination reactions directed by the breast and ovarian cancer tumor susceptibility protein BRCA1.     

S5a promotes protein degradation by blocking synthesis of nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains

Ubiquitin (Ub)–protein conjugates formed by purified ring‐finger or U‐box E3s with the E2, UbcH5, resist degradation and disassembly by 26S proteasomes. These chains contain multiple types of Ub forks in which two Ub's are linked to adjacent lysines on the proximal Ub. We tested whether cells contain factors that prevent formation of nondegradable conjugates and whether the forked chains prevent proteasomal degradation. S5a is a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) protein present in the cytosol and in the 26S proteasome. Addition of S5a or a GST‐fusion of S5a's UIM domains to a ubiquitination reaction containing 26S proteasomes, UbcH5, an E3 (MuRF1 or CHIP), and a protein substrate, dramatically stimulated its degradation, provided S5a was present during ubiquitination. Mass spectrometry showed that S5a and GST–UIM prevented the formation of Ub forks without affecting synthesis of standard isopeptide linkages. The forked Ub chains bind poorly to 26S proteasomes unlike those synthesized with S5a present or linked to Lys63 or Lys48 chains. Thus, S5a (and presumably certain other UIM proteins) function with certain E3/E2 pairs to ensure synthesis of efficiently degraded non‐forked Ub conjugates.     

Monoubiquitination Is Critical for Ovarian Tumor Domain-containing Ubiquitin Aldehyde Binding Protein 1 (Otub1) to Suppress UbcH5 Enzyme and Stabilize p53 Protein

Ovarian tumor domain-containing ubiquitin (Ub) aldehyde binding protein 1 (Otub1) regulates p53 stability and activity via non-canonical inhibition of the MDM2 cognate Ub-conjugating enzyme (E2) UbcH5. However, it is not clear how this activity of Otub1 is regulated in cells. Here we report that Otub1 is monoubiquitinated by UbcH5 in cells and in vitro, primarily at the lysine 59 and 109 residues. This monoubiquitination, in turn, contributes to the activity of Otub1 to suppress UbcH5. The lysine-free Otub1 mutant (Otub1^K0) fails to be monoubiquitinated and is unable to suppress the Ub-conjugating activity of UbcH5 in vitro and the MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination in cells. Consistently, this mutant is unable to stabilize p53, induce apoptosis, and suppress cell proliferation. Overexpression of Otub1^K0 inhibits DNA-damage induced apoptosis. Adding either Lys-59 or Lys-109 back to the Otub1^K0 mutant restores the monoubiquitination of Otub1 and its function to stabilize and activate p53. We further show that UbcH5 preferentially binds to the monoubiquitinated Otub1 via Ub interaction with its backside donor Ub-interacting surface, suggesting that this binding interferes with the self-assembly of Ub-charged UbcH5 (UbcH5∼Ub) conjugates, which is critical for Ub transfer. Thus, our data reveal novel insights into the Otub1 inhibition of E2 wherein monoubiquitination promotes the interaction of Otub1 with UbcH5 and the function to suppress it.     

Role of a non-canonical surface of Rad6 in ubiquitin conjugating activity

Rad6 is a yeast E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme that monoubiquitinates histone H2B in conjunction with the E3, Bre1, but can non-specifically modify histones on its own. We determined the crystal structure of a Rad6∼Ub thioester mimic, which revealed a network of interactions in the crystal in which the ubiquitin in one conjugate contacts Rad6 in another. The region of Rad6 contacted is located on the distal face of Rad6 opposite the active site, but differs from the canonical E2 backside that mediates free ubiquitin binding and polyubiquitination activity in other E2 enzymes. We find that free ubiquitin interacts weakly with both non-canonical and canonical backside residues of Rad6 and that mutations of non-canonical residues have deleterious effects on Rad6 activity comparable to those observed to mutations in the canonical E2 backside. The effect of non-canonical backside mutations is similar in the presence and absence of Bre1, indicating that contacts with non-canonical backside residues govern the intrinsic activity of Rad6. Our findings shed light on the determinants of intrinsic Rad6 activity and reveal new ways in which contacts with an E2 backside can regulate ubiquitin conjugating activity.     

Insights into Ubiquitination from the Unique Clamp-like Binding of the RING E3 AO7 to the E2 UbcH5B

RING proteins constitute the largest class of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Unlike most RINGs, AO7 (RNF25) binds the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, UbcH5B (UBE2D2), with strikingly high affinity. We have defined, by co-crystallization, the distinctive means by which AO7 binds UbcH5B. AO7 contains a structurally unique UbcH5B binding region (U5BR) that is connected by an 11-amino acid linker to its RING domain, forming a clamp surrounding the E2. The U5BR interacts extensively with a region of UbcH5B that is distinct from both the active site and the RING-interacting region, referred to as the backside of the E2. An apparent paradox is that the high-affinity binding of the AO7 clamp to UbcH5B, which is dependent on the U5BR, decreases the rate of ubiquitination. We establish that this is a consequence of blocking the stimulatory, non-covalent, binding of ubiquitin to the backside of UbcH5B. Interestingly, when non-covalent backside ubiquitin binding cannot occur, the AO7 clamp now enhances the rate of ubiquitination. The high-affinity binding of the AO7 clamp to UbcH5B has also allowed for the co-crystallization of previously described and functionally important RING mutants at the RING-E2 interface. We show that mutations having marked effects on function only minimally affect the intermolecular interactions between the AO7 RING and UbcH5B, establishing a high degree of complexity in activation through the RING-E2 interface.     

Ubiquitin Transfer from the E2 Perspective: Why is UbcH5 So Promiscuous?

Protein ubiquitination is a regulatory process that influences nearly every aspect of eukaryotic cell biology. Pathways that range from cell-cycle progression and differentiation to DNA repair to vesicle budding all rely on regulated modification of target proteins by ubiquitin. Target proteins can be tagged by a single molecule of ubiquitin or modified by ubiquitin polymers that can vary in length and linkage specificity, and these variations influence how ubiquitination signals are interpreted. Surprisingly, little is understood regarding mechanisms of protein ubiquitination and how poly-ubiquitin chains are synthesized. Simple models to explain ubiquitin transfer have dominated the literature, but recent work suggests basic assumptions as to how proteins assemble to facilitate protein ubiquitination and poly-ubiquitin chain synthesis should be re-examined. This is particularly necessary for understanding the roles played by E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, a central protein component in all ubiquitin transfer reactions. In particular, UbcH5, a canonical E2 protein that is active in a broad number of in vitro ubiquitin transfer reactions, is capable of binding ubiquitin non-covalently on a surface distinct from its active site. This unique property allows activated UbcH5~Ub complexes to self-assemble and has a profound influence on poly-ubiquitin chain synthesis.     

E2-c-Cbl recognition is necessary but not sufficient for ubiquitination activity

The E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UbcH7 and UbcH5B both show specific binding to the RING (really interesting new gene) domain of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase c-Cbl, but UbcH7 hardly supports ubiquitination of c-Cbl and substrate in a reconstituted system. Here, we found that neither structural changes nor subtle differences in the E2-E3 interaction surface are possible explanations for the functional specificity of UbcH5B and UbcH7 in their interaction with c-Cbl. The quick transfer of ubiquitin from the UbcH5B∼Ub thioester to c-Cbl or other ubiquitin acceptors suggests that UbcH5B might functionally be a relatively pliable E2 enzyme. In contrast, the UbcH7∼Ub thioester is too stable to transfer ubiquitin under our assay conditions, indicating that UbcH7 might be a more specific E2 enzyme. Our results imply that the interaction specificity between c-Cbl and E2 is required but not sufficient for transfer of ubiquitin to potential targets.     

Modulation of K11-linkage formation by variable loop residues within UbcH5A

Ubiquitination refers to the covalent addition of ubiquitin (Ub) to substrate proteins or other Ub molecules via the sequential action of three enzymes (E1, E2, and E3). Recent advances in mass spectrometry proteomics have made it possible to identify and quantify Ub linkages in biochemical and cellular systems. We used these tools to probe the mechanisms controlling linkage specificity for UbcH5A. UbcH5A is a promiscuous E2 enzyme with an innate preference for forming polyubiquitin chains through lysine 11 (K11), lysine 48 (K48), and lysine 63 (K63) of Ub. We present the crystal structure of a noncovalent complex between Ub and UbcH5A. This structure reveals an interaction between the Ub surface flanking K11 and residues adjacent to the E2 catalytic cysteine and suggests a possible role for this surface in formation of K11 linkages. Structure-guided mutagenesis, in vitro ubiquitination and quantitative mass spectrometry have been used to characterize the ability of residues in the vicinity of the E2 active site to direct synthesis of K11- and K63-linked polyubiquitin. Mutation of critical residues in the interface modulated the linkage specificity of UbcH5A, resulting in generation of more K63-linked chains at the expense of K11-linkage synthesis. This study provides direct evidence that the linkage specificity of E2 enzymes may be altered through active-site mutagenesis.     

Molecular and structural insight into lysine selection on substrate and ubiquitin lysine 48 by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34

The attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) to lysines on substrates or itself by ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes results in protein ubiquitination. Lysine selection is important for generating diverse substrate-Ub structures and targeting proteins to different fates; however, the mechanisms of lysine selection are not clearly understood. The positioning of lysine(s) toward the E2/E3 active site and residues proximal to lysines are critical in their selection. We investigated determinants of lysine specificity of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34, toward substrate and Ub lysines. Evaluation of the relative importance of different residues positioned −2, −1, +1 and +2 toward ubiquitination of its substrate, Sic1, on lysine 50 showed that charged residues in the −1 and −2 positions negatively impact on ubiquitination. Modeling suggests that charged residues at these positions alter the native salt-bridge interactions in Ub and Cdc34, resulting in misplacement of Sic1 lysine 50 in the Cdc34 catalytic cleft. During polyubiquitination, Cdc34 showed a strong preference for Ub lysine 48 (K48), with lower activity towards lysine 11 (K11) and lysine 63 (K63). Mutating the −2, −1, +1 and +2 sites surrounding K11 and K63 to mimic those surrounding K48 did not improve their ubiquitination, indicating that further determinants are important for Ub K48 specificity. Modeling the ternary structure of acceptor Ub with the Cdc34~Ub complex as well as in vitro ubiquitination assays unveiled the importance of K6 and Q62 of acceptor Ub for Ub K48 polyubiquitination. These findings provide molecular and structural insight into substrate lysine and Ub K48 specificity by Cdc34.     

The structures of ubiquitin conjugates of yeast Iso-2-cytochrome c.

Ubiquitin (Ub) conjugates to Saccharomyces cerevisiae iso-2-cytochrome c were formed in vitro in a rabbit reticulocyte extract (Fraction II). In the presence of ubiquitin-aldehyde, used to inhibit ubiquitin-protein isopeptidases in Fraction II, mono-, di-, and triubiquitinated cytochrome c conjugates accumulated in a 1.2:1.0:0.2 molar ratio. CNBr digestions showed that, in all three conjugates, Ub attachment was within the first 73 amino acids of the cytochrome c. For the two most abundant conjugates, this region was further narrowed to the first 30 residues by peptide mapping with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease. N-terminal protein sequencing identified Lys-13 as the major ubiquitination site in each conjugate. For di- and triubiquitinated iso-2-cytochrome c, this suggested that Ub2 and Ub3 multiubiquitin chains extend from Lys-13. This conclusion was supported by a variation of protein sequencing in which polypeptides recovered after Edman degradation were analyzed to determine at which cycle(s) radiolabeled Ub or Ubn was cleaved from the conjugate. Because of the sensitivity afforded by the use of 125I-Ub in this "stutter-step" sequencing method, minor ubiquitination at Lys-8 also was detected. Thus, Ub2-iso-2-cytochrome c conjugates contain mostly Ub2 at Lys-13 with a small fraction of conjugates having single Ubs on 2 residues, Lys-8 and Lys-13. Similarly, Ub3-iso-2-cytochrome c predominantly has a Ub3 chain on Lys-13, although minor species with combinations of Ub1 and Ub2 distributed on Lys-8 and Lys-13 also may be present. This specificity is discussed in the context of iso-2-cytochrome c structure.     

RING-H2 protein WSSV249 from white spot syndrome virus sequesters a shrimp ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, PvUbc, for viral pathogenesis

Modification of proteins by ubiquitin is essential for numerous cellular processes. The RING-H2 finger motif has been implicated in ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. Four proteins, WSSV199, WSSV222, WSSV249, and WSSV403, from white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) contain the RING-H2 motif. Here we report that WSSV249 physically interacts with a shrimp ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, PvUbc, and mediates ubiquitination through its RING-H2 motif in the presence of E1 and PvUbc. Mutations of the putative zinc coordination residues in the RING-H2 domain of WSSV249, however, ablate ubiquitination efficiency. In addition, the RING-H2 domain of WSSV249 is capable of ubiquitination with UbcH1, UbcH2, UbcH5a, UbcH5b, UbcH5c, UbcH6, and UbcH10, respectively, exhibiting a low degree of E2 specificity. Significantly, the expression of WSSV249 and PvUbc increased during infection, as revealed by real-time PCR. Furthermore, in situ hybridization showed that WSSV249 and PvUbc display similar expression patterns in infected shrimps, and immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry assays showed an increase of PvUbc in infected shrimp cells. These results suggest that the RING-H2 protein WSSV249 from WSSV may function as an E3 ligase via sequestration of PvUbc for viral pathogenesis in shrimp.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein kinase G acts as an unusual ubiquitinating enzyme to impair host immunity

Upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, protein kinase G (PknG), a eukaryotic‐type serine‐threonine protein kinase (STPK), is secreted into host macrophages to promote intracellular survival of the pathogen. However, the mechanisms underlying this PknG–host interaction remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that PknG serves both as a ubiquitin‐activating enzyme (E1) and a ubiquitin ligase (E3) to trigger the ubiquitination and degradation of tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated factor 2 (TRAF2) and TGF‐β‐activated kinase 1 (TAK1), thereby inhibiting the activation of NF‐κB signaling and host innate responses. PknG promotes the attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) to the ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme (E2) UbcH7 via an isopeptide bond (UbcH7 K82‐Ub), rather than the usual C86‐Ub thiol‐ester bond. PknG induces the discharge of Ub from UbcH7 by acting as an isopeptidase, before attaching Ub to its substrates. These results demonstrate that PknG acts as an unusual ubiquitinating enzyme to remove key components of the innate immunity system, thus providing a potential target for tuberculosis treatment.     

MEX is a testis-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes death receptor-induced apoptosis

In the present study, we report the identification and characterization of MEX (MEKK1-related protein X), a protein with homology to MEKK1 that is expressed uniquely in the testis. MEX is comprises four putative zinc-binding domains including an N-terminal SWIM (SWI2/SNF2 and MuDR) domain of unknown function and two RING (really interesting new gene) fingers separated by a ZZ zinc finger domain. Biochemical analyses revealed that MEX is self-ubiquitinated and targeted for degradation through the proteasome pathway. MEX can act as an E3, Ub (ubiquitin) ligase, through the E2, Ub-conjugating enzymes UbcH5a, UbcH5c or UbcH6. A region of MEX that contains the RING fingers and the ZZ zinc finger was required for interaction with UbcH5a and MEX self-association, whereas the SWIM domain was critical for MEX ubiquitination. The expression of MEX promoted apoptosis that was induced through Fas, DR (death receptor) 3 and DR4 signalling, but not that mediated by the BH3 (Bcl-2 homology 3)-only protein BimEL or the chemotherapeutic drug adriamycin. The enhancement of apoptosis by MEX required a functional SWIM domain, suggesting that MEX ubiquitination is critical for the enhancement of apoptosis. These results indicate that MEX acts as an E3 Ub ligase, an activity that is dependent on the SWIM domain and suggest a role for MEX in the regulation of death receptor-induced apoptosis in the testes.     

NK lytic-associated molecule, involved in NK cytotoxic function, is an E3 ligase

NK lytic-associated molecule (NKLAM) is a protein involved in the cytolytic function of NK cells and CTLs. It has been localized to the cytolytic granules in NK cells and is up-regulated when cells are exposed to cytokines IL-2 or IFN-beta. We report in this study that NKLAM contains a cysteine-rich really interesting new gene (RING) in between RING-RING domain, and that this domain possesses strong homology to the RING domain of the known E3 ubiquitin ligase, Dorfin. To determine whether NKLAM functions as an E3 ligase, we performed coimmunoprecipitation binding assays with ubiquitin conjugates (Ubcs) UbcH7, UbcH8, and UbcH10. We demonstrated that both UbcH7 and UbcH8 bind to full-length NKLAM. We then performed a similar binding assay using endogenous NKLAM and UbcH8 expressed by human NK clone NK3.3 to show that the protein interaction occurs in vivo. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we identified uridine kinase like-1 (URKL-1) protein as a substrate for NKLAM. We confirmed that NKLAM and URKL-1 interact in mammalian cells by using both immunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy. We demonstrated decreased protein expression and enhanced ubiquitination of URKL-1 in the presence of NKLAM. These data indicate that NKLAM is a RING finger protein that binds Ubcs and has as one of its substrates, URKL-1, thus defining this cytolytic protein as an E3 ubiquitin ligase.     

Structure of LNX1:Ubc13 ~ Ubiquitin Complex Reveals the Role of Additional Motifs for the E3 Ligase Activity of LNX1

LNX1 (ligand of numb protein-X1) is a RING and PDZ domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitinates human c-Src kinase. Here, we report the identification and structure of the ubiquitination domain of LNX1, the identification of Ubc13/Ube2V2 as a functional E2 in vitro, and the structural and functional studies of the Ubc13~Ub intermediate in complex with the ubiquitination domain of LNX1. The RING domain of LNX1 is embedded between two zinc-finger motifs (Zn-RING-Zn), both of which are crucial for its ubiquitination activity. In the heterodimeric complex, the ubiquitin of one monomer shares more buried surface area with LNX1 of the other monomer and these interactions are unique and essential for catalysis. This study reveals how the LNX1 RING domain is structurally and mechanistically dependent on other motifs for its E3 ligase activity, and describes how dimeric LNX1 recruits ubiquitin-loaded Ubc13 for Ub transfer via E3 ligase-mediated catalysis.     

The basis for selective E1-E2 interactions in the ISG15 conjugation system

E1 and E2 enzymes coordinate the first steps in conjugation of ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls). ISG15 is an interferon-alpha/beta-induced Ubl, and the E1 and E2 enzymes for ISG15 conjugation are Ube1L and UbcH8, respectively. UbcH7 is the most closely related E2 to UbcH8, yet it does not function in ISG15 conjugation in vivo, while both UbcH7 and UbcH8 have been reported to function in Ub conjugation. Kinetic analyses of wild-type and chimeric E2s were performed to determine the basis for preferential activation of UbcH8 by Ube1L and to determine whether UbcH8 is activated equally well by Ube1L and E1(Ub) (Ube1). K(m) determinations confirmed the strong preference of Ube1L for UbcH8 over UbcH7 (a 29-fold K(m) difference), similar to the preference of E1(Ub) for UbcH7 over UbcH8 (a 36-fold K(m) difference). Thioester assays of chimeric E2s identified two structural elements within residues 1-39 of UbcH8 that play a major role in defining Ube1L-UbcH8 specificity: the alpha1-helix and the beta1-beta2 region. The C-terminal ubiquitin fold domain (UFD) of Ube1L was required for transfer of ISG15 to UbcH8 and for binding of Ube1L to UbcH8. Replacement of the Ube1L UFD with that from E1(Ub) resulted in preferential transfer of ISG15 to UbcH7. Together, these results indicate that Ube1L discriminates between UbcH8 and closely related Ub E2s based on specific interactions between the Ube1L UFD and determinants within the N-terminal region of UbcH8.