Totipotent migratory stem cells in a hydroid

Hydroids, members of the most ancient eumetazoan phylum, the Cnidaria, harbor multipotent, migratory stem cells lodged in interstitial spaces of epithelial cells and are therefore referred to as interstitial cells or i-cells. According to traditional understanding, based on studies in Hydra, these i-cells give rise to several cell types such as stinging cells, nerve cells, and germ cells, but not to ectodermal and endodermal epithelial cells; these are considered to constitute separate cell lineages. We show here that, in Hydractinia, the developmental potential of these migratory stem cells is wider than previously anticipated. We eliminated the i-cells from subcloned wild-type animals and subsequently introduced i-cells from mutant clones and vice versa. The mutant donors and the wild-type recipients differed in their sex, growth pattern, and morphology. With time, the recipient underwent a complete conversion into the phenotype and genotype of the donor. Thus, under these experimental conditions the interstitial stem cells of Hydractinia exhibit totipotency.     

Maternally localized germ plasm mRNAs and germ cell/stem cell formation in the cnidarian Clytia

The separation of the germ line from the soma is a classic concept in animal biology, and depending on species is thought to involve fate determination either by maternally localized germ plasm ("preformation" or "maternal inheritance") or by inductive signaling (classically termed "epigenesis" or "zygotic induction"). The latter mechanism is generally considered to operate in non-bilaterian organisms such as cnidarians and sponges, in which germ cell fate is determined at adult stages from multipotent stem cells. We have found in the hydrozoan cnidarian Clytia hemisphaerica that the multipotent "interstitial" cells (i-cells) in larvae and adult medusae, from which germ cells derive, express a set of conserved germ cell markers: Vasa, Nanos1, Piwi and PL10. In situ hybridization analyses unexpectedly revealed maternal mRNAs for all these genes highly concentrated in a germ plasm-like region at the egg animal pole and inherited by the i-cell lineage, strongly suggesting i-cell fate determination by inheritance of animal-localized factors. On the other hand, experimental tests showed that i-cells can form by epigenetic mechanisms in Clytia, since larvae derived from both animal and vegetal blastomeres separated during cleavage stages developed equivalent i-cell populations. Thus Clytia embryos appear to have maternal germ plasm inherited by i-cells but also the potential to form these cells by zygotic induction. Reassessment of available data indicates that maternally localized germ plasm molecular components were plausibly present in the common cnidarian/bilaterian ancestor, but that their role may not have been strictly deterministic.     

The hydroid Hydractinia: a versatile, informative cnidarian representative

The Cnidaria represent the most ancient eumetazoan phylum. Members of this group possess typical animal cells and tissues such as sensory cells, nerve cells, muscle cells and epithelia. Due to their unique phylogenetic position, cnidarians have traditionally been used as a reference group in various comparative studies. We propose the colonial marine hydroid, Hydractinia, as a convenient, versatile platform for basic and applied research in developmental biology, reproduction, immunology, environmental studies and more. In addition to being a typical cnidarian representative, Hydractinia offers many practical and theoretical advantages: studies that are feasible in Hydra like regeneration, pattern regulation, and cell renewal from stem cells, can be supplemented by genetic analyses and classical embryology in Hydractinia. Metamorphosis of the planula larva of Hydractinia can be used as a model for cell activation and communication and the presence of a genetically controlled allorecognition system makes it a suitable model for comparative immunology. Most importantly, Hydractinia may be manipulated at most aspects of its (short) life cycle. It has already been the subject of many studies in various disciplines, some of which are discussed in this essay.     

A selective screen reveals discrete functional domains in Drosophila Nanos

The Drosophila protein Nanos encodes an evolutionarily conserved protein with two zinc finger motifs. In the embryo, Nanos protein function is required for establishment of the anterior-posterior body pattern and for the migration of primordial germ cells. During oogenesis, Nanos protein is involved in the establishment and maintenance of germ-line stem cells and the differentiation of oocyte precursor cells. To establish proper embryonic patterning, Nanos acts as a translational regulator of hunchback RNA. Nanos' targets for germ cell migration and development are not known. Here, we describe a selective genetic screen aimed at isolating new nanos alleles. The molecular and genetic analysis of 68 new alleles has allowed us to identify amino acids critical for nanos function. This analysis shows that the CCHC motifs, which coordinate two metal ions, are essential for all known functions of Nanos protein. Furthermore, a region C-terminal to the zinc fingers seems to constitute a novel functional domain within the Nanos protein. This "tail region" of Nanos is required for abdomen formation and germ cell migration, but not for oogenesis.     

Regulation of interstitial cell differentiation in Hydra attenuata. I. Homeostatic control of interstitial cell population size.

Mechanisms regulating the population size of the multipotent interstitial cell (i-cell) in Hydra attenuata were investigated. Treatment of animals with 3 cycles of a regime of 24 h in 10-2 M hydroxyurea (HU) alternated with 12 h in culture medium selectively killed 95-99% of the i-cells, but had little effect on the epithelial cells. The i-cell population recovered to the normal i-cell:epithelial cell ratio of I:I within 35 days. Continuous labelling experiments with [3H]thymidine indicate that the recovery of the i-cell population is not due to a change in the length of the cell cycle of either the epithelial cells or the interstitial cells. In control animals 60% of the i-cell population undergo division daily while 40% undergo differentiation. Quantification of the cell types of HU-treated animals indicates that a greater fraction of the i-cells were dividing and fewer differentiating into nematocytes during the first 2 weeks of the recovery after HU treatment. Therefore, the mechanism for recovery involves a shift of the 60:40 division:differentiation ratio of i-cells towards a higher fraction in division until the normal population size of the i-cells is regained. This homeostatic mechanism represents one of the influences affecting i-cell differentiation.     

Self/nonself recognition in Cnidaria: contact to allogeneic tissue does not result in elimination of nonself cells in Hydra vulgaris

Although Cnidaria have no specialised immune cells, some colonial forms possess a genetic system to discriminate between self and nonself. Allorecognition is thought to protect them from fusion with genetically different individuals and to prevent germ line parasitism. Surprisingly, when grafting tissue of two species of the solitary freshwater polyp Hydra, we found within the contact zone phagocytozing epithelial cells which selectively eliminated cells from the other species (Bosch and David, 1986). This led us to speculate that Hydra, which never undergoes "natural transplantation", can differentiate between self and nonself (Bosch and David, 1986). In a previous paper (Kuznetsov et al., 2002) we described that cells which accumulate in the contact region of these interspecies grafts are apoptotic and that apoptosis is induced by impaired cell matrix contact. Thus, observations in such interspecies grafts did not give hints concerning the presence of a discriminative allorecognition system. To clarify whether this fundamental aspect of immunity is present in these phylogenetically old animals, we examined epithelial interactions between different strains of Hydra vulgaris. Here, we show that contact to allogeneic tissue does not evoke any response in terms of phagocytosis and elimination of allogeneic cells. We, therefore, question Hydra's ability to discriminate between self and nonself and propose that, in contrast to colonial cnidarians, the solitary polyp Hydra has either lost or substantially reduced this ability.     

Functional redundancy among Nanos proteins and a distinct role of Nanos2 during male germ cell development

The mouse Nanos proteins, Nanos2 and Nanos3, are required for germ cell development and share a highly conserved zinc-finger domain. The expression patterns of these factors during development, however, differ from each other. Nanos3 expression in the mouse embryo commences in the primordial germ cells (PGCs) just after their formation, and a loss of this protein results in the germ cell-less phenotype in both sexes. By contrast, Nanos2 expression begins only in male PGCs after their entry into the genital ridge and a loss of this protein results in a male germ cell deficiency, irrespective of the co-expression of Nanos3 in these cells. These results indicate that these two Nanos proteins have distinct functions, which depend on the time and place of their expression. To further elucidate this, we have generated transgenic mouse lines that express Nanos2 under the control of the Oct4DeltaPE promoter and examined Nanos2 function in a Nanos3-null genetic background. We find that ectopically produced Nanos2 protein rescues the Nanos3-null defects, because the germ cells fully develop in both sexes in the transgenic mice. This result indicates that Nanos2 can substitute for Nanos3 during early PGC development. By contrast, our current data show that Nanos3 does not rescue the defects in Nanos2-null mice. Our present findings thus indicate that there are redundant functions of the Nanos proteins in early PGC development, but that Nanos2 has a distinct function during male germ cell development in the mouse.     

Role of epithelial cells and programmed cell death in Hydra spermatogenesis

Spermatogenesis in higher animals is a tightly regulated process, in which survival and death of sperm precursor cells depends on the presence of somatic cells in gonads. In the basal metazoan Hydra spermatogenesis takes place in anatomically simple testes and in the absence of accessory structures. Hydra sperm precursors are derived from interstitial stem cells. Here we show that large numbers of sperm precursors in testes of Hydra vulgaris undergo programmed cell death (apoptosis) and that ectodermal epithelial cells phagocytose the apoptotic sperm precursors. This is surprising since so far no evidence has been reported that epithelial cells are directly involved in germ cell differentiation in Hydra. We propose that, similar to Sertoli cells in mammals, in Hydra epithelial cells support and perhaps even control spermatogenesis.     

Hydra, a versatile model to study the homeostatic and developmental functions of cell death

In the freshwater cnidarian polyp Hydra, cell death takes place in multiple contexts. Indeed apoptosis occurs during oogenesis and spermatogenesis, during starvation, and in early head regenerating tips, promoting local compensatory proliferation at the boundary between heterografts. Apoptosis can also be induced upon exposure to pro-apoptotic agents (colchicine, wortmannin), upon heat-shock in the thermosensitive sf-1 mutant, and upon wounding. In all these contexts, the cells that undergo cell death belong predominantly to the interstitial cell lineage, whereas the epithelial cells, which are rather resistant to pro-apoptotic signals, engulf the apoptotic bodies. Beside this clear difference between the interstitial and the epithelial cell lineages, the different interstitial cell derivatives also show noticeable variations in their respective apoptotic sensitivity, with the precursor cells appearing as the most sensitive to pro-apoptotic signals. The apoptotic machinery has been well conserved across evolution. However, its specific role and regulation in each context are not known yet. Tools that help characterize apoptotic activity in Hydra have recently been developed. Among them, the aposensor Apoliner initially designed in Drosophila reliably measures wortmannin-induced apoptotic activity in a biochemical assay. Also, flow cytometry and TUNEL analyses help identify distinctive features between wortmannin-induced and heat-shock induced apoptosis in the sf-1 strain. Thanks to the live imaging tools already available, Hydra now offers a model system with which the functions of the apoptotic machinery to maintain long-term homeostasis, stem cell renewal, germ cell production, active developmental processes and non-self response can be deciphered.     

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

The presence of highly specific histocompatibility reactions in colonial marine invertebrates that lack adaptive immune systems (such as the sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans, and ascidians) provides a unique opportunity to investigate the evolutionary roots of allorecognition and to explore whether homologous innate recognition systems exist in vertebrates. Conspecific interactions among adult animals in these groups are regulated by highly specific allorecognition systems that restrict somatic fusion to self or close kin. In Hydractinia (Cnidaria:Hydrozoa), fusion/rejection responses are controlled by two linked genetic loci. Alleles at each locus are co-dominantly inherited. Colonies fuse if they share at least one haplotype, reject if they share no haplotypes, and display transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype – a pattern that echoes natural killer cell responses in mice and humans. Allorecognition in Hydractinia and other marine invertebrates serves as a safeguard against stem cell or germline parasitism thus, limiting chimerism to closely related individuals. These animals fail to become tolerant even if exposed during early development to cells from a histoincompatible individual. Detailed analysis of the structure and function of molecules responsible for allorecognition in basal marine invertebrates could provide clues to the innate mechanisms by which higher animals respond to organ and cell allografts, including embryonic tissues.     

Model systems of invertebrate allorecognition

Nearly all colonial marine invertebrates are capable of allorecognition--the ability to distinguish between self and genetically distinct members of the same species. When two or more colonies grow into contact, they either reject each other and compete for the contested space or fuse and form a single, chimeric colony. The specificity of this response is conferred by genetic systems that restrict fusion to self and close kin. Two selective pressures, intraspecific spatial competition between whole colonies and competition between stem cells for access to the germline in fused chimeras, are thought to drive the evolution of extensive polymorphism at invertebrate allorecognition loci. After decades of study, genes controlling allorecognition have been identified in two model systems, the protochordate Botryllus schlosseri and the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. In both species, allorecognition specificity is determined by highly polymorphic cell-surface molecules, encoded by the fuhc and fester genes in Botryllus, and by the alr1 and alr2 genes in Hydractinia. Here we review allorecognition phenomena in both systems, summarizing recent molecular advances, comparing and contrasting the life history traits that shape the evolution of these distinct allorecognition systems, and highlighting questions that remain open in the field.     

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

The presence of highly specific histocompatibility reactions in colonial marine invertebrates that lack adaptive immune systems (such as the sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans and ascidians) provides a unique opportunity to investigate the evolutionary roots of allorecognition and to explore whether homologous innate recognition systems exist in vertebrates. Conspecific interactions among adult animals in these groups are regulated by highly specific allorecognition systems that restrict somatic fusion to self or close kin. In Hydractinia (Cnidaria:Hydrozoa), fusion/rejection responses are controlled by two linked genetic loci. Alleles at each locus are co-dominantly inherited. Colonies fuse if they share at least one haplotype, reject if they share no haplotypes, and display transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype—a pattern that echoes natural killer cell responses in mice and humans. Allorecognition in Hydractinia and other marine invertebrates serves as a safeguard against stem cell or germline parasitism thus, limiting chimerism to closely related individuals. These animals fail to become tolerant even if exposed during early development to cells from a histoincompatible individual. Detailed analysis of the structure and function of molecules responsible for allorecognition in basal marine invertebrates could provide clues to the innate mechanisms by which higher animals respond to organ and cell allografts, including embryonic tissues.Key words: allorecognition, chimerism, invertebrate, innate immune system     

Cell lineages in Hydra: isolation and characterization of an interstitial stem cell restricted to egg production in Hydra oligactis

In an attempt to isolate unipotent stem cells (progenitors to the nerve cells, nematocytes, gland cells, and gametes) from Hydra oligactis females, animals were treated with a drug (hydroxyurea, HU) that preferentially lowers or eliminates the interstitial stem cells, leaving the epithelial tissue intact. In this epithelial environment, interstitial cells remaining after treatment will proliferate and differentiate, permitting a long-term analysis of their developmental capabilities. Following treatment of females with HU, animals were isolated that contained interstitial cells that gave rise to eggs only. Two clones of animals containing these cells were propagated for several years and the growth and differentiation behavior of the interstitial cells examined in their asexually produced offspring. During this time, the cells displayed an extensive proliferative capacity (classifying them as stem cells) and remained restricted to egg differentiation. It is proposed that both the sperm- and the egg-restricted stem cells arise from a multipotent stem cell, which also gives rise to the somatic cells (see above), and that, in hydra, sex is ultimately determined by interactions between cells of the two germ cell lineages.