TCR基因免疫治疗中优化转TCR基因配对的研究进展

TCR基因修饰T细胞的过继性免疫治疗是指将识别肿瘤抗原的特异性TCR基因转导至外周血T细胞,经大量扩增后回输给患者,从而发挥抗肿瘤效应的一种治疗技术。目前TCR基因治疗所面临的关键问题之一是如何改造修饰转TCR基因使得转TCR α链和β链在T细胞表面优先配对以提高转T细胞的功能,并避免off-target反应毒性的产生。最近,各种基因修饰策略被用于优化转TCR基因配对和减少错配。介绍了近年来针对TCR基因进行修饰改造的各种策略及TCR基因治疗的临床试验。     

T细胞抗原识别与活化研究

T细胞是通过其表面受体-T细胞抗原特异性受体（T cell antigen specific receptor,TCR）识别抗原并进行免疫应答的．T细胞如何识别以及清除抗原一直是分子免疫学研究的重点．免疫应答的重要过程是淋巴细胞的活化．而T细胞活化是细胞介导的免疫应答中不可缺少的内容．鉴于T细胞抗原识别和活化在免疫应答中的重要性．对近年来T细胞在抗原识别与活化研究方面所取得的重要进展进行了综述,并展望了T细胞的研究前景．     

恒定自然杀伤T细胞与肿瘤免疫治疗

恒定自然杀伤T细胞(iNKT)是T淋巴细胞的一个独特亚群,兼具自然杀伤(NK)细胞和T细胞特征,同时表达T细胞受体(TCR)和NK细胞表面标志。iNKT细胞被激活后,通过分泌细胞因子,活化其它免疫细胞参与先天性免疫和获得性免疫,在抗肿瘤免疫过程中发挥调节作用。在多种癌症患者体内,发现外周血中iNKT细胞的数量降低、功能减弱,进而导致临床治疗效果不佳。近年来,基础研究和早期临床试验结果表明,注射抗原递呈细胞或/和体外培养并活化的iNKT细胞,抗肿瘤免疫治疗效果显著。本文就iNKT细胞的分类及生物学特性,在肿瘤免疫治疗中的作用与其机制,以及其临床应用等进行综述。     

恒定自然杀伤T细胞与肿瘤免疫治疗北大核心CSCD

恒定自然杀伤T细胞(i NKT)是T淋巴细胞的一个独特亚群,兼具自然杀伤(NK)细胞和T细胞特征,同时表达T细胞受体(TCR)和NK细胞表面标志。i NKT细胞被激活后,通过分泌细胞因子,活化其它免疫细胞参与先天性免疫和获得性免疫,在抗肿瘤免疫过程中发挥调节作用。在多种癌症患者体内,发现外周血中i NKT细胞的数量降低、功能减弱,进而导致临床治疗效果不佳。近年来,基础研究和早期临床试验结果表明,注射抗原递呈细胞或/和体外培养并活化的i NKT细胞,抗肿瘤免疫治疗效果显著。本文就i NKT细胞的分类及生物学特性,在肿瘤免疫治疗中的作用与其机制,以及其临床应用等进行综述。     

鸡T细胞受体的研究进展

T细胞受体（TCellReCeptor,TCR）是存在于T细胞膜上的识别外来抗原与自身MHCI类（或Ⅱ类抗原）的复合物成分。它是T细胞将外部信号转化为内部信号,触发T细胞增殖分化、发挥其效应功能的重要分子基础。TCR结构与功能的研究,是深入探讨机体免疫应答机理的重要内容之一。应用单克隆抗体（MCAb）技术和分子生物学技术,已对人和小鼠TCR生物学特性有了详尽的认识。近年来,对鸡TCR结构与功能的研究也取得了新的研究进展,本文就鸡TCR生物学特性的最新研究进展作一综述。一、鸡TCR结构及其亚群分类象哺乳动物一样,鸡TCR多肽键…     

超级抗原在肿瘤免疫治疗中的应用

超级抗原（Superantigen，SAg）作为一种优秀的免疫激活剂，通过诱导T细胞的活化来增强机体抗肿瘤免疫反应，可能是未来肿瘤免疫治疗的新希望。“超级抗原”一词在1989年被首次提出，用来描述细菌毒素对免疫系统的高效刺激特性。金黄色葡萄球菌能产生约20种不同类型的金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素（Staphylococcal enterotoxins，SEs)，这类蛋白质抗原是典型的细菌超级抗原，是一种能够在极低浓度下即可有效刺激细胞毒性T淋巴细胞活性和促进细胞因子产生的诱导剂。超级抗原通过与抗原呈递细胞（APCs）上的主要组织相容性复合体II（MHC-II）的外沟和T细胞受体（Tcr）的特异性Vβ区交叉结合，直接激活T淋巴细胞，使含有TCR Vβ结构域的T细胞进行超表达，使免疫细胞释放大量的抗肿瘤细胞因子和其他效应分子。基于免疫细胞具有识别自我和非我的特点，超级抗原利用人体自身免疫系统杀死肿瘤细胞，因此在肿瘤免疫治疗领域具有巨大应用潜力。对超级抗原的生物活性特征、临床抗肿瘤效果、药物开发策略等多方面进行简要综述，并对其未来应用前景加以展望。对超级抗原的作用机理及临床应用的深入研究，将有助于肿瘤免疫治疗的发展，从而使通过T淋巴细胞干预治疗恶性肿瘤成为可能。     

T细胞抗原受体的结构与功能研究进展

T细胞抗原受体(T ceIl receptor,TCR)是T细胞表面关键的受体分子。TCR特异性地识别各种多肽抗原并通过胞内区ITAM磷酸化传递抗原刺激信号,进而引发T细胞的免疫效应。TCR的活性异常将会导致自身免疫病和免疫缺陷病的发生。对于TCR结构和功能的深入研究有助于我们更好地理解免疫反应的分子机理,从而为相关免疫疾病的预防和治疗提供重要的理论依据。该文对TCR的分类、基因重排机制、受体组装方式及其结构基础、TCR对抗原的识别以及活化机制等方面的研究成果进行了总结,综述了近几年来的最新研究进展。     

T细胞重定向双特异性抗体在肿瘤治疗中的挑战与应对策略

T细胞重定向双特异性抗体能同时结合肿瘤相关抗原和T细胞表面CD3分子,通过将T细胞与肿瘤细胞桥联而激活T细胞发挥抗肿瘤作用,是肿瘤免疫治疗中极具潜力的策略之一。该疗法已成功应用于多种血液肿瘤的治疗,但在实体瘤治疗领域进展缓慢。就近年T细胞重定向双特异性抗体在肿瘤治疗方面所面临的主要挑战及解决策略进行综述,以探讨未来有可能改善其疗效的潜在策略。     

靶向 T 细胞共信号的肿瘤免疫治疗研究进展

T 细胞介导的肿瘤免疫至少需要 T 细胞受体和共刺激分子“双信号”参与的学说目前得到了广泛支持。共抑制或共刺激分子提供的 共信号决定了 T 细胞受体信号介导的免疫应答的最终效应。近年来,靶向共抑制分子如 CTLA-4 和 PD-1 开发的抗体药物在临床应用中获 得了巨大成功,使得肿瘤免疫治疗成为最令人瞩目的研究领域,并被美国《科学》杂志评为 2013 年度十大科学突破之首。肿瘤免疫治疗有 望成为与手术、放化疗和靶向治疗并驾齐驱的抗肿瘤主流治疗方案。针对共抑制分子 CTLA-4、PD-1、PD-L1 和共刺激分子 CD137,综述 其发挥免疫调节作用的分子机制及其相关靶向药物在肿瘤治疗方面的最新进展和应用。     

过继免疫治疗中DC-CIK的研究进展

目前,免疫细胞生物学和免疫分子生物学发展迅猛,由于其具备低毒性和高效率的特性,肿瘤免疫治疗在恶性肿瘤治疗中所起的作用引起了学者们的广泛关注,其中细胞介导的过继免疫治疗为当前研究的热点之一。过继免疫治疗(adoptive cellular immunotherapy,ACI)是目前恶性肿瘤治疗的新方向,它通过向细胞免疫功能低下者回输具有抗肿瘤活性的免疫细胞,直接杀伤或间接杀伤肿瘤细胞,使其获得抗肿瘤免疫力。树突状细胞(Dendritic cell DC)是专职抗原递呈细胞(antigen presenting cell APC)之一,在机体免疫应答的启始、调节、维持中发挥核心作用。细胞因子诱导的杀伤(cytokine induced killer CIK)细胞具有高效的MHC非限制性溶瘤活性,具有极其广泛的杀瘤范围。近年来,国内外大量研究表明,联合培养的DC-CIK抗肿瘤活性提升明显,患者预后生存期延长,效果显著。本文就DC与CIK生物学特点及抗肿瘤作用予以简要综述。     

Requirements for effective antitumor responses of TCR transduced T cells

Adoptive transfer of TCR gene-modified T cells has been proposed as an attractive approach to target tumors for which it is difficult or impossible to induce strong tumor-specific T cell responses by vaccination. Whereas the feasibility of generating tumor Ag-specific T cells by gene transfer has been demonstrated, the factors that determine the in vivo effectiveness of TCR-modified T cells are largely unknown. We have analyzed the value of a number of clinically feasible strategies to enhance the antitumor potential of TCR modified T cells. These experiments reveal three factors that contribute greatly to the in vivo potency of TCR-modified T cells. First, irradiation-induced host conditioning is superior to vaccine-induced activation of genetically modified T cells. Second, increasing TCR expression through genetic optimization of TCR sequences has a profound effect on in vivo antitumor activity. Third, a high precursor frequency of TCR modified T cells within the graft is essential. Tumors that ultimately progress in animals treated with this optimized regimen for TCR-based adoptive cell transfer invariably display a reduced expression of the target Ag. This suggests TCR gene therapy can achieve a sufficiently strong selective pressure to warrant the simultaneous targeting of multiple Ags. The strategies outlined in this study should be of value to enhance the antitumor activity of TCR-modified T cells in clinical trials.     

Targeting the tumor and its associated stroma: One and one can make three in adoptive T cell therapy of solid tumors

Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) has become a promising immunotherapeutic option for cancer patients. The proof for ACT therapeutic efficacy was first obtained with allogenic T cells and then reproduced with T cells isolated from patients’ tumor samples (i.e. tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes). It is now clear that specificity of ACT products can be educated by genetically engineering T cells with classical T Cell Receptors (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptors (CAR). To date a poor accessibility of the tumor mass and a hostile microenvironment, influenced by genetic and epigenetic instability, mainly limit ACT therapeutic efficacy in the case of solid tumors. Available data indicate that these hurdles might be overcome by combinatorial therapeutic strategies targeting the tumor and its associated stroma. Here we review some of the available dual targeting strategies focusing on given combination of TCR/CAR-redirected T cell products and their association with drugs targeting the tumor-vessel and/or epigenetic modifiers, with the ability to sensitize tumors to T cell recognition. Existing data have proven synergistic effects in combined settings (one and one can indeed make three) and suggest that further benefit might be achieved by additional combinatorial therapeutic approaches (could one + one + one make ten?) in ACT of solid tumor.     

Development of CD8+ T cells expressing two distinct receptors specific for MTB and HIV‐1 peptides

The immune response in individuals co‐infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and the human immunodeficiency virus (MTB/HIV) gradually deteriorates, particularly in the cellular compartment. Adoptive transfer of functional effector T cells can confer protective immunity to immunodeficient MTB/HIV co‐infected recipients. However, few such effector T cells exist in vivo, and their isolation and amplification to sufficient numbers is difficult. Therefore, enhancing immune responses against both pathogens is critical for treating MTB/HIV co‐infected patients. One approach is adoptive transfer of T cell receptor (TCR) gene‐modified T cells for the treatment of MTB/HIV co‐infections because lymphocyte numbers and their functional avidity is significantly increased by TCR gene transfer. To generate bispecific CD8⁺ T cells, MTB Ag85B_199–207 peptide‐specific TCRs (MTB/TCR) and HIV‐1 Env_120–128 peptide‐specific TCRs (HIV/TCR) were isolated and introduced into CD8⁺ T cells simultaneously using a retroviral vector. To avoid mispairing among exogenous and endogenous TCRs, and to improve the function and stability of the introduced TCRs, several strategies were employed, including introducing mutations in the MTB/TCR constant (C) regions, substituting part of the HIV/TCR C regions with CD3ζ, and linking gene segments with three different 2A peptides. Results presented in this report suggest that the engineered T cells possessed peptide‐specific specificity resulting in cytokine production and cytotoxic activity. This is the first report describing the generation of engineered T cells specific for two different pathogens and provides new insights into TCR gene therapy for the treatment of immunocompromised MTB/HIV co‐infected patients.     

Successful TCR-based immunotherapy for autoimmune myocarditis with DNA vaccines after rapid identification of pathogenic TCR

The identification of TCRs of autoimmune disease-inducing T cells within a short period of time is a key factor for designing TCR-based immunotherapy during the course of the disease. In this study, we show that experimental autoimmune carditis-associated TCRs, Vbeta8.2 and Vbeta10, were determined by complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3)-spectratyping analysis and subsequent sequencing of the CDR3 region of spectratype-derived TCR clones. Immunotherapy targeting both Vbeta8.2 and Vbeta10 TCRs using mAbs and DNA vaccines significantly reduced the histological severity of experimental autoimmune carditis and completely suppressed the inflammation in some animals. Since depletion or suppression of one of two types of effector cells does not improve the severity of the disease significantly, combined TCR-based immunotherapy should be considered as a primary therapy for T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases. TCR-based immunotherapy after rapid identification of autoimmune disease-associated TCRs by CDR3 spectratyping can be applicable, not only to animal, but also to human autoimmune diseases whose pathomechanism is poorly understood.     

The versatility of the αβ T‐cell antigen receptor

The T‐cell antigen receptor is a heterodimeric αβ protein (TCR) expressed on the surface of T‐lymphocytes, with each chain of the TCR comprising three complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) that collectively form the antigen‐binding site. Unlike antibodies, which are closely related proteins that recognize intact protein antigens, TCRs classically bind, via their CDR loops, to peptides (p) that are presented by molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This TCR‐pMHC interaction is crucially important in cell‐mediated immunity, with the specificity in the cellular immune response being attributable to MHC polymorphism, an extensive TCR repertoire and a variable peptide cargo. The ensuing structural and biophysical studies within the TCR‐pMHC axis have been highly informative in understanding the fundamental events that underpin protective immunity and dysfunctional T‐cell responses that occur during autoimmunity. In addition, TCRs can recognize the CD1 family, a family of MHC‐related molecules that instead of presenting peptides are ideally suited to bind lipid‐based antigens. Structural studies within the CD1‐lipid antigen system are beginning to inform us how lipid antigens are specifically presented by CD1, and how such CD1‐lipid antigen complexes are recognized by the TCR. Moreover, it has recently been shown that certain TCRs can bind to vitamin B based metabolites that are bound to an MHC‐like molecule termed MR1. Thus, TCRs can recognize peptides, lipids, and small molecule metabolites, and here we review the basic principles underpinning this versatile and fascinating receptor recognition system that is vital to a host's survival.     

Keeping Tumors in Check: A Mechanistic Review of Clinical Response and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer

Immune checkpoints are a diverse set of inhibitory signals to the immune system that play a functional role in adaptive immune response and self-tolerance. Dysregulation of these pathways is a vital mechanism in the avoidance of immune destruction by tumor cells. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) refers to targeted strategies to disrupt the tumor co-opted immune suppression to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) are two immune checkpoints that have the widest range of antibody-based therapies. These therapies have gone from promising approaches to Food and Drug Administration-approved first- and second-line agents for a number of immunogenic cancers. The burgeoning investigations of ICB efficacy in blood and solid cancers have underscored the importance of identifying the predictors of response and resistance to ICB. Identification of response correlates is made complicated by the observations of mixed reactions, or different responses in multiple lesions from the same patient, and delayed responses that can occur over a year after the induction therapy. Factors that can influence response and resistance in ICB can illuminate underlying molecular mechanisms of immune activation and suppression. These same response predictors can guide the identification of patients who would benefit from ICB, reduce off-target immune-relate adverse events, and facilitate the use of combinatorial therapies to increase efficacy. Here we review the underlying principles of immune checkpoint therapy and results of single-agent ICB clinical trials, and summarize the predictors of response and resistance.     

Orai1-NFAT signalling pathway triggered by T cell receptor stimulation

T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation plays a crucial role in development, homeostasis, proliferation, cell death, cytokine production, and differentiation of T cells. Thus, in depth understanding of TCR signalling is crucial for development of therapy targeting inflammatory diseases, improvement of vaccination efficiency, and cancer therapy utilizing T cell-based strategies. TCR activation turns on various signalling pathways, one of the important one being the Ca²⁺-calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) signalling pathway. Stimulation of TCRs triggers depletion of intracellular Ca²⁺ store and in turn, initiates store-operated Ca²⁺ entry (SOCE), one of the major mechanisms to raise the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentrations in T cells. Ca²⁺-release-activated-Ca²⁺ (CRAC) channels are a prototype of store-operated Ca²⁺ (SOC) channels in immune cells that are very well characterized. Recent identification of STIM1 as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca²⁺ sensor and Orai1 as the pore subunit has dramatically advanced the understanding of CRAC channels and provides a molecular tool to investigate the physiological outcomes of Ca²⁺ signalling during immune responses. In this review, we focus on our current understanding of CRAC channel activation, regulation, and downstream calcineurin-NFAT signaling pathway.     

MHC Multimer-Guided and Cell Culture-Independent Isolation of Functional T Cell Receptors from Single Cells Facilitates TCR Identification for Immunotherapy

Adoptive therapy using T cells redirected to target tumor- or infection-associated antigens is a promising strategy that has curative potential and broad applicability. In order to accelerate the screening process for suitable antigen-specific T cell receptors (TCRs), we developed a new approach circumventing conventional in vitro expansion-based strategies. Direct isolation of paired full-length TCR sequences from non-expanded antigen-specific T cells was achieved by the establishment of a highly sensitive PCR-based T cell receptor single cell analysis method (TCR-SCAN). Using MHC multimer-labeled and single cell-sorted HCMV-specific T cells we demonstrate a high efficacy (approximately 25%) and target specificity of TCR-SCAN receptor identification. In combination with MHC-multimer based pre-enrichment steps, we were able to isolate TCRs specific for the oncogenes Her2/neu and WT1 even from very small populations (original precursor frequencies of down to 0.00005% of CD3⁺ T cells) without any cell culture step involved. Genetic re-expression of isolated receptors demonstrates their functionality and target specificity. We believe that this new strategy of TCR identification may provide broad access to specific TCRs for therapeutically relevant T cell epitopes.     

Therapeutic efficacy of antitumor dendritic cell vaccinations correlates with persistent Th1 responses,high intratumor CD8+ T cell recruitment and low relative regulatory T cell infiltration

Despite the increasing number of immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer, most approaches have failed to correlate the induction of an anti-tumor immune response with therapeutic efficacy. We therefore took advantage of a successful vaccination strategy-combining dendritic cells and irradiated GM-CSF secreting tumor cells-to compare the immune response induced against 9L gliosarcoma tumors in cured rats versus those with progressively growing tumors. At the systemic level, the tumor specific cytotoxic responses were quite heterogeneous in uncured vaccinated rats, and were surprisingly often high in animals with rapidly-growing tumors. IFN-gamma secretion by activated splenic T cells was more discriminative as the CD4+ T cell-mediated production was weak in uncured rats whereas high in cured ones. At the tumor level, regressing tumors were strongly infiltrated by CD8+ T cells, which demonstrated lytic capacities as high as their splenic counterparts. In contrast, progressing tumors were weakly infiltrated by T cells showing impaired cytotoxic activities. Proportionately to the T cell infiltrate, the expression of Foxp3 was increased in progressive tumors suggesting inhibition by regulatory T cells. In conclusion, the main difference between cured and uncured vaccinated animals does not depend directly upon the induction of systemic cytotoxic responses. Rather the persistence of higher CD4+ Th1 responses, a high intratumoral recruitment of functional CD8+ T cells, and a low proportion of regulatory T cells correlate with tumor rejection.