Investigation of Relation between Use of Oral Contraceptives and Thromboembolic Disease. A Further Report

The results of a previous study of the use of oral contraceptives by married women discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in the years 1964–6 were reported by us last year. The present paper adds results relating to patients discharged during 1967 and a few data, that could not be sought previously, for patients discharged with cerebral or coronary thrombosis from three of the hospitals in the earlier period.Of 84 patients with deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism 42 (50%) had used oral contraceptives during the month preceding the onset of their illness, while only 23 of the 168 controls (14%) had done so. No differences in risk were found either for the types of preparation or for the duration of use. After allowance for age and height, the patients with venous thromboembolism were about 10 lb. (4,535 g.) heavier than the control patients, irrespective of whether they were using oral contraceptives or not. No appreciable difference was found between the smoking habits of patients with and without venous thromboembolism treated during 1967, nor between women who were using oral contraceptives and those who were not. The trend in hospital admissions for venous thromboembolism with time corresponded to the trend in the use of oral contraceptives, and there was no evidence to suggest that the number of admissions was affected by publicity about the risk of using the preparations. Of 19 patients with cerebral thrombosis 11 (58%) had been using oral contraceptives, compared with an expected figure of 3.5 from the experience of the control subjects. All the published data (clinical, angiographic, and post-mortem) show that the thrombosis affects the cerebral arteries rather than the cerebral veins. Of 17 patients with coronary thrombosis 2 (12%) had been using oral contraceptives, compared with an expected figure of 2.1. The patients with coronary thrombosis smoked more than the control patients and were, on average, 8.3 lb. (3,765 g.) heavier than control women of the same age and height.The new evidence strengthens the belief that oral contraceptives are a cause of venous thromboembolism and cerebral thrombosis but does not indicate that they are a cause of coronary thrombosis.     

Diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism by consultants in Scotland.

A questionnaire was sent to 508 consultants in Scotland likely to encounter deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism to assess their current standard practice in diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. Replies were received from 358 (70.5%). In deep vein thrombosis 47% and in pulmonary embolism 33% of consultants usually depended on clinical observation alone for diagnosis. In deep vein thrombosis 37% used venography to supplement clinical diagnosis and in pulmonary embolism 13% used angiography and 53% used isotopic scanning. Almost all consultants treated deep vein thrombosis (95%) and pulmonary embolism (99%) with anticoagulants. Most consultants (81%) gave heparin by intravenous infusion. Although many consultants gave intravenous heparin for more than three days (49.5% in deep vein thrombosis and 61% in pulmonary embolism), 25% of these consultants did not use any laboratory monitoring of heparin''s effect. Large numbers of consultants gave warfarin for more than three months (20% in deep vein thrombosis and 47% in pulmonary embolism). There was a significant tendency to give heparin (p less than 0.01) and warfarin (p less than 0.001) for longer periods in pulmonary embolism than in deep vein thrombosis. This survey shows a widely varying practice and underlines the need for further controlled studies to provide clear guidance in the management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.     

Effect of intravenous dextran 70 and pneumatic leg compression on incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolism.

The incidence of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis was measured in 50 matched pairs of patients undergoing common surgical procedures with preoperative and postoperative ventilation-perfusion lung scans and the fibrinogen uptake test. One patient in each pair was treated with intravenous dextran 70 and pneumatic leggings. The incidence of pulmonary embolism among the treated patients was significantly reduced from 24% to 8%, but the incidence of deep vein thrombosis was not significantly reduced (34% to 24%).     

Effectiveness of long term oral anticoagulation treatment in preventing venous thrombosis in hereditary protein S deficiency.

In eight of 14 patients who were deficient in protein S and who belonged to two unrelated families thrombosis presented as thrombophlebitis in seven and deep vein thrombosis in six, complicated by pulmonary embolism in four and leg ulcers in two. In four patients superficial thrombophlebitis preceded deep vein thrombosis by one to 11 years. Post-thrombotic varicose veins and venous insufficiency had developed in four patients. In three of those and in a fourth patient symptomatic superficial thrombophlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism did not recur while they were taking oral anticoagulant treatment for six to 12 years. The anticoagulation intensity corresponded to international normalised ratio values of over 2.5. It is concluded that the benefits of anticoagulant treatment for patients with congenital thrombotic disease are great, and thus it is necessary to make an early diagnosis and treat patients at risk of developing thrombosis.     

肾病综合征合并肺栓塞的临床研究进展

肾病综合征是一种临床常见疾病,其患者体内常呈高凝状态,极易发生血栓栓塞事件,而其中以肾静脉血栓、肺动脉栓塞和 下肢深静脉血栓最为常见。由于肺动脉栓塞早期缺乏特征性的临床表现,病情隐匿,所以极易误诊或漏诊,发现时患者病情往往 已十分严重,致死率极高。目前,对于肾病综合征合并肺栓塞的发生率国内外报道不一,尚无准确的流行病学资料,而对于其发病 原因、危险因素、早期诊断及是否需要预防性抗凝治疗等均存在争议,本文主要结合文献对肾病综合征合并肺栓塞的流行病学、 病因及发病机制、诊断、高危因素和治疗进行了综述,尤其是对目前争议较大的肾病综合征合并肺栓塞患者是否需要早期抗凝治 疗。     

Genetic risk factors of venous thrombosis

Venous thrombosis, whose main clinical presentations include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, represents a major health problem worldwide. Numerous conditions are known to predispose to venous thrombosis and these conditions are commonly referred to as risk indicators or risk factors. Generally accepted or "classically" acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism include advanced age, prolonged immobilisation, surgery, fractures, use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, pregnancy, puerperium, cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome. In addition to these well-established risk factors for venous thrombosis, several lines of evidence that have emerged over the past few decades indicate a role of novel genetic risk factors, mainly related to the haemostatic system, in influencing thrombotic risk. The most significant breakthrough has been the confirmation of the concept that inherited hypercoagulable conditions are present in a large proportion of patients with venous thromboembolic disease. These include mutations in the genes that encode antithrombin, protein C and protein S, and the factor V Leiden and factor II G20210 A mutations. Moreover, plasmatic risk indicators, such as hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated concentrations of factors II, VIII, IX, XI and fibrinogen, have also been documented. This extensive list of genetic and acquired factors serves to illustrate that a single cause of venous thrombosis does not exist and that this condition should be considered as a complex or multifactorial trait. Complex traits can be understood by assuming an interaction between different mutations in candidate susceptibility genes. The risk that is associated with each genetic defect may be relatively low in isolation but the simultaneous presence of several mutations may dramatically increase disease susceptibility. Moreover, environmental factors may interact with one or more genetic variations to add further to the risk. The analysis of genetic risk factors and plasmatic factors, together with private life style and environmental factors, has contributed significantly to our understanding of the genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis.     

Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--III: Reduction in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by antiplatelet prophylaxis among surgical and medical patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy as prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in surgical and high risk medical patients. DESIGN--Overviews of all randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy that could have been available by March 1990 and in which deep venous thrombosis was assessed systematically. SETTING--53 trials (total 8400 patients) of an average of two weeks of antiplatelet therapy versus control in general or orthopaedic surgery; nine trials (600 patients) of antiplatelet therapy versus control in other types of immobility; 18 trials (1000 patients) of one antiplatelet regimen versus another. RESULTS--Overall, a few weeks of antiplatelet therapy produced a highly significant (2P < 0.00001) reduction in deep venous thrombosis. 25% of patients allocated antiplatelet therapy versus 34% of appropriately adjusted controls had deep venous thrombosis detected by systematic fibrinogen scanning or venography, representing prevention in about 90 patients per 1000 allocated antiplatelet therapy. There was an even greater proportional reduction in pulmonary embolism: such emboli were detected among 47 (1.0%) antiplatelet allocated patients versus an adjusted control total of 129 (2.7%), representing prevention among about 17 patients per 1000 treated (2P < 0.00001). In analyses confined to surgical trials, the proportional reductions were similar and separately significant for nonfatal pulmonary embolism (0.7% antiplatelet therapy v 1.8% control; 2P < 0.00001) and for deaths attributed to pulmonary embolism (0.2% v 0.9%; 2P = 0.0001). There was a slight but non-significant excess of deaths from other causes (1.0% v 0.7%), which made the difference in total mortality nonsignificant, though still favourable (1.2% v 1.5%). Information on adding antiplatelet therapy to heparin was limited but, at least for pulmonary embolism, suggested more protection from the combination than from heparin alone. The proportional reduction in the odds of suffering a deep venous thrombosis was roughly the same in patients having general surgery, traumatic orthopaedic surgery, and elective orthopaedic surgery (and in medical patients who were at increased risk of thromboembolism). For pulmonary embolism the numbers affected were smaller, but again the reductions were highly significant both in general surgery (16 (0.5%) v 58 (1.7%) pulmonary emboli; 2P < 0.0001) and in orthopaedic surgery (28 (2.7%) v 63 (6.1%) pulmonary emboli; 2P < 0.0002). CONCLUSION--It had previously been supposed that antiplatelet therapy did not influence venous thromboembolism, and many surgeons and physicians do not use it routinely for thromboprophylaxis, even for patients who are at substantial risk of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. These results indicate that antiplatelet therapy--either alone or, for greater effect, in addition to other proved forms of thromboprophylaxis (such as subcutaneous heparin)--should be considered.     

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the plastic surgery patient

The term venous thromboembolism refers to a spectrum of disease that includes deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are often clinically silent and thus difficult to diagnose, which leads to a substantial delay in treatment that results in high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purposes of this article are to help physicians determine the proper venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and to simplify the complex problem of treating venous thromboembolism. The tools provided in this article will help expedite and clarify the decision-making process.     

Prevention of deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement: randomised comparison between unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two subcutaneous prophylactic regimens for postoperative deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. DESIGN--Prospective open randomised multicentre trial. SETTING--28 European departments of orthopaedic surgery. INTERVENTION--All patients had bilateral phlebography 10 days after surgery. 31 patients receiving low molecular weight heparin and 29 receiving unfractionated heparin were excluded from the efficacy analysis for various reasons. PATIENTS--349 patients undergoing total hip replacement between September 1988 and May 1989. 174 patients received subcutaneously a low molecular weight heparin (Fraxiparine) with anti-factor Xa activity of 41 IU/kg/day for three days, then 62 IU/kg/day from day 4 to day 10. 175 patients received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin at intervals of eight hours; doses were adjusted to maintain the activated thromboplastin time at two to five seconds above control values. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Total incidence of deep vein thrombosis and incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis on bilateral phlebography. RESULTS--The total incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 16% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin and 12.6% in patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (p = 0.45), and the incidence of thrombosis of the proximal veins was 13.1% and 2.9% respectively (p less than 0.001). Four patients receiving unfractionated heparin and one receiving low molecular weight heparin developed pulmonary embolism. The incidence of bleeding complications was low and comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION--Low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as unfractionated heparin in preventing deep vein thrombosis and is more effective at preventing thrombosis of the proximal veins in patients undergoing hip replacement. Low molecular weight heparin is not more likely to cause bleeding complications and is simpler to give than unfractionated heparin.     

Oral contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism: absence of an effect of smoking.

We conducted a case-control study to test the hypothesis that women smokers who use oral contraceptives have an increased risk of developing venous thrombosis. Patients and controls were drawn from two sets of hospital patients already included in the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Programme. Sixty patients with uncomplicated thromboembolism were matched with 180 controls with other diagnoses; all were premenopausal women taking oral contraceptives. Patients with conditions that might predispose to thromboembolism or be related to smoking were excluded. We found no association between smoking habits and thromboembolism. Similarly, we found no association between thromboembolism, smoking, and duration of oral contraceptive use. Thus we conclude that differences in fibrinolytic activity between smokers and non-smokers are not major factors in the aetiology of uncomplicated thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives.     

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and venous thromboembolism

Background:Women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have a 2- to 5-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with nonusers. Increasingly, evidence has suggested that the size of the risk increase varies according to related factors, such as the type of estrogen used, the mode of delivery, and the presence of other predisposing factors.Objective:The aim of this study was to examine the current literature to assess the varying risk of venous thrombosis among women taking HRT.Methods:An extensive search was carried out on all major electronic databases including MEDLINE 1995 to October 2005 and BIS (EMBASE) 1980 to October 2005. Relevant keywords relating to thrombosis (venous thromboembolism, venous thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) combined with hormones (hormone replacement therapy and estrogen) were used to capture all potentially relevant studies.Results:The increased risk of a first episode of venous thrombosis in women currently taking HRT compared with nonusers ranged from 1.22 (95% CI, 0.76–1.94) to 4.50 (95% CI, 1.30–15.10). Similar increases in risks for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were found. The risk of venous thrombosis is the highest in the first year of therapy, durich which as much as a greater than 6-fold increase was found. Women taking estrogen-progestin HRT had a significantly greater risk of venous thrombosis than those using estrogen-only preparations (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13–2.26). Studies have also suggested a dose-related effect, suggesting high-dose estrogen therapy is associated with a greater increased risk of venous thrombosis than low-dose preparations. Comparisons between oral and transdermal HRT have shown a significant difference in the relative risk of venous thrombosis (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9–8.3) favoring the use of transdermal preparations. The presence of thrombophilia, particularly factor V Leiden, further amplifies the risk of venous thrombosis in women using HRT (OR, 13.16; 95% CI, 4.28–40.47). The presence of other risk factors, such as increasing age and being overweight, were all shown to be associated with a further increase in the risk of venous thrombosis.ConclusionsRecent studies have confirmed that current users of HRT are at increased risk of venous thrombosis. The increase in risk has been shown to vary according to duration of use, with the risk being greatest during the first year of use. Moreover, the increased risk varies according to the type of preparation and presence of additional risk factors such as increasing age, obesity, cancer, and recent surgery. Few studies have examined the relationship between thrombophilia, HRT and venous thrombosis; thus, more research is required in this area before accurate estimates of the risk can be made.     

Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism is a common disease that is associated with considerable morbidity if left untreated. Recently, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been evaluated for use in acute treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Randomized studies have shown that LMWHs are as effective as unfractionated heparin in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and are as safe with respect to the occurrence of major bleeding. A pooled analysis did not show substantial differences among different LMWH compounds used, but no direct comparison of the different LMWHs is currently available. Finally, in patients with pulmonary embolism, there is a relative lack of large studies of daily practice. It could be argued that large prospective studies, in patients who were treated with LMWHs from the moment of diagnosis, are needed.     

Dextran 70 in prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease after surgery: a clinically oriented randomized double-blind trial.

A randomized double-blind trial of prophylaxis of thromboembolism in surgical patients judged by clinical morbidity has been completed. Altogether 831 patients over 40 years of age who underwent elective surgery of the stomach, biliary system, or colon received either dextran 70 or normal saline before the operation. Thirteen of the 435 patients on saline and three of the 396 on dextran developed pulmonary embolism. Eight of these 16 patients died of pulmonary embolism--seven in the saline group and one in the dextran group. As detected either clinically or by 125I-fibrinogen scanning the incidence of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the two groups. There was no increased incidence of excessive bleeding in patients on dextran though clinical impression suggested that some patients on dextran bled excessively. This trial showed that dextran 70 administered by intravenous drip during operation is effective in preventing pulmonary embolism and, in particular, reducing mortality from this cause. It seems to be as effective as subcutaneous heparin but is easier to administer and places less of a burden on nursing services.     

Incidence of Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism in Nurses

The incidence of idiopathic deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in a group of nurses (9·4 per 1,000 per year and 7·5 per 1,000 per year respectively) was much higher than the reported incidence in women of childbearing age in the general population (0·65 per 1,000 per year and 0·11 per 1,000 per year respectively). We suggest that these results show that nurses face an increased risk of idiopathic thromboembolism as a result of their occupation.     

Case-control study of risk of cerebral sinus thrombosis in oral contraceptive users who are carriers of hereditary prothrombotic conditions

Objective: To investigate whether users of oral contraceptives who are carriers of a hereditary prothrombotic condition (factor V Leiden mutation, protein C, S, or antithrombin deficiency) have an increased risk of cerebral sinus thrombosis. Design: Comparison of a prospective series of cases of cerebral sinus thrombosis with population data. Setting: Neurological teaching hospitals from different regions in the Netherlands (cases) and a representative sample of the non-institutionalised Dutch population (controls). Subjects: 40 women aged 18-54 years with cerebral sinus thrombosis (cases) and 2248 women aged 18-49 years (controls). Main outcome measure: Current use of oral contraceptives at the time of the thrombosis (cases) or at the time of the questionnaire (controls). Prevalences of a hereditary prothrombotic condition in patients and in the population with odds ratios. Results: 34 of 40 (85%) women with cerebral sinus thrombosis used oral contraceptives, versus 1007 of 2248 (45%) of the control women; the age adjusted odds ratio was 13 (95% confidence interval 5 to 37). Seven of 36 patients (19%) had a prothrombotic deficiency, versus 7% expected in the population; this corresponds to a threefold to fourfold increase in risk. In women who used oral contraceptives and also carried a prothrombotic defect, the odds ratio for cerebral sinus thrombosis was about 30 relative to women who had neither risk factor. Conclusion: The use of oral contraceptives and being a carrier of a hereditary prothrombotic condition increase the risk of and interact in a multiplicative way in the development of cerebral sinus thrombosis.

Key messages

• The use of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
• This risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in women who use oral contraceptives is larger if there is an additional hereditary prothombotic factor (protein C, S, or antithrombin deficiency, factor V Leiden mutation)
• The association between oral contraceptives, thrombophilia, and deep vein thrombosis is also valid for cerebral sinus thrombosis
• Women do not need to stop using oral contraceptives as the absolute risk of cerebral sinus thrombosis is very small

     

Department of health changes advice on third generation pills

The restriction on the use of third-generation oral contraceptives, pills which contain gestodene and desogestrel, has been lifted, and the pills can now be offered to women who want to use the method. The Committee on Safety of Medicine imposed the 1995 restriction after a study suggested a small increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosis. But after extensive research, the Medicines Commission stated that third generation pills can be prescribed to women provided that they will be informed of the greater risk involved. In addition, third-generation pills would contain new package inserts, explaining the risks of deep vein thrombosis. The warning will state that the risk of deep vein thrombosis in women not taking the pill is 5/100,000 women/year. This risk increases to 15/100,000 women/year in women taking second-generation pills, while it is 25/100,000 women/year in women taking third-generation pills.     

Serum Fibrin/Fibrinogen Degradation Products Associated with Postoperative Pulmonary Embolus and Venous Thrombosis

A total of 76 “high-risk” surgical patients were studied for evidence of venous thromboembolic disease. Episodes of deep vein thrombosis and of pulmonary embolism were related to changes in blood levels of fibrin degradation products (F.D.P.). When diagnosed either by ordinary clinical means or by venography and isotope scanning significantly raised F.D.P. levels were found in all cases. Serum F.D.P. estimations are unlikely to help in detecting deep vein thrombosis, but may prove valuable in diagnosing pulmonary embolism.     

Thromboembolic Complications in Myelomatosis

Fourteen cases of myelomatosis associated with major thromboembolic complications are reported. Six patients died of pulmonary embolism, seven had deep-vein thrombosis as a presenting symptom, and three had evidence of amyloidosis. A preliminary estimate of the incidence of thromboembolism based on 376 patients admitted so far to the Medical Research Council''s myelomatosis trial is about 3%, while pulmonary embolism accounted for about 3% of all deaths. Possibly a hypercoagulable state and the presence of amyloidosis may be important in the pathogenesis of this complication.     

Combined use of rapid d-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review

Objective To summarise the evidence supporting the use of rapid d-dimer testing combined with estimation of clinical probability to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis among outpatients.Data sources Medline (June 1993 to December 2003), the Database of Abstracts and Reviews (DARE), and reference lists of studies in English.Selection of studies We selected 12 studies from among 84 reviewed. The selected studies included more than 5000 patients and used a rapid d-dimer assay and explicit criteria to classify cases as having low, intermediate, or high clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity among consecutive outpatients.Review methods Diagnosis required objective confirmation, and untreated patients had to have at least three months of follow up. The outcome was objectively documented venous thromboembolism. Two authors independently abstracted data by using a data collection form.Results When the less sensitive SimpliRED d-dimer assay was used the three month incidence of venous thromboembolism was 0.5% (95% confidence interval 0.07% to 1.1%) among patients with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis and normal d-dimer concentrations. When a highly sensitive d-dimer assay was used, the three month incidence of venous thromboembolism was 0.4% (0.04% to 1.1%) among outpatients with low or moderate clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis and a normal d-dimer concentration.Conclusions The combination of low clinical probability for deep vein thrombosis and a normal result from the SimpliRED d-dimer test safely excludes a diagnosis of acute venous thrombosis A normal result from a highly sensitive d-dimer test effectively rules out deep vein thrombosis among patients classified as having either low or moderate clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis.