The role of ATP hydrolysis for kinesin processivity

Conventional kinesin is a highly processive, plus-end-directed microtubule-based motor that drives membranous organelles toward the synapse in neurons. Although recent structural, biochemical, and mechanical measurements are beginning to converge into a common view of how kinesin converts the energy from ATP turnover into motion, it remains difficult to dissect experimentally the intermolecular domain cooperativity required for kinesin processivity. We report here our pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of a kinesin switch I mutant at Arg(210) (NXXSSRSH, residues 205-212 in Drosophila kinesin). The results show that the R210A substitution results in a dimeric kinesin that is defective for ATP hydrolysis and a motor that cannot detach from the microtubule although ATP binding and microtubule association occur. We propose a mechanistic model in which ATP binding at head 1 leads to the plus-end-directed motion of the neck linker to position head 2 forward at the next microtubule binding site. However, ATP hydrolysis is required at head 1 to lock head 2 onto the microtubule in a tight binding state before head 1 dissociation from the microtubule. This mechanism optimizes forward movement and processivity by ensuring that one motor domain is tightly bound to the microtubule before the second can detach.     

Kinesin's biased stepping mechanism: amplification of neck linker zippering

A physically motivated model of kinesin's motor function is developed within the framework of rectified Brownian motion. The model explains how the amplification of neck linker zippering arises naturally through well-known formulae for overdamped dynamics, thereby providing a means to understand how weakly-favorable zippering leads to strongly favorable plus-directed binding of a free kinesin head to microtubule. Additional aspects of kinesin's motion, such as head coordination and rate-limiting steps, are directly related to the force-dependent inhibition of ATP binding to a microtubule bound head. The model of rectified Brownian motion is presented as an alternative to power stroke models and provides an alternative interpretation for the significance of ATP hydrolysis in the kinesin stepping cycle.     

Kinesin: a molecular motor with a spring in its step

A key step in the processive motion of two-headed kinesin along a microtubule is the 'docking' of the neck linker that joins each kinesin head to the motor's dimerized coiled-coil neck. This process is similar to the folding of a protein beta-hairpin, which starts in a highly mobile unfolded state that has significant entropic elasticity and finishes in a more rigid folded state. We therefore suggest that neck-linker docking is mechanically equivalent to the thermally activated shortening of a spring that has been stretched by an applied load. This critical tension-dependent step utilizes Brownian motion and it immediately follows the binding of ATP, the hydrolysis of which provides the free energy that drives the kinesin cycle. A simple three-state model incorporating neck-linker docking can account quantitatively for both the kinesin force-velocity relation and the unusual tension-dependence of its Michaelis constant. However, we find that the observed randomness of the kinesin motor requires a more detailed four-state model. Monte Carlo simulations of single-molecule stepping with this model illustrate the possibility of sub-8 nm steps, the size of which is predicted to vary linearly with the applied load.     

A chemically reversible Brownian motor: application to kinesin and Ncd.

Kinesin and nonclaret disjunctional protein (ncd) are two microtubule-based molecular motors that use energy from ATP hydrolysis to drive motion in opposite directions. They are structurally very similar and bind with similar orientations on microtubule. What is the origin of the different directionality? Is it some subtle feature of the structure of the motor domains, not apparent in x-ray diffraction studies, or possibly some difference near the neck regions far from the microtubule binding site? Perhaps because the motors function as dimers, the explanation involves differences in the strength of the interaction between the two motor monomers themselves. Here we present another possibility, based on a Brownian ratchet, in which the direction of motion of the motor is controlled by the chemical mechanism of ATP hydrolysis and is an inherent property of a single head. In contrast to conventional power stroke models, dissociation of the individual heads is not obligatory in the chemomechanical cycle, and the steps during which motion and force generation occurs are best described as one-dimensional thermally activated transitions that take place while both heads are attached to the microtubule. We show that our model is consistent with experiments on kinesin in which the velocity is measured as a function of external force and with the observed stiochiometry of one ATP/8-nm step at low load. Further, the model provides a way of understanding recent experiments on the ATP dependence of the variance (randomness) of the distance moved in a given time.     

Kinesin, 30 years later: Recent insights from structural studies

Motile kinesins are motor proteins that move unidirectionally along microtubules as they hydrolyze ATP. They share a conserved motor domain (head) which harbors both the ATP‐ and microtubule‐binding activities. The kinesin that has been studied most moves toward the microtubule (+)‐end by alternately advancing its two heads along a single protofilament. This kinesin is the subject of this review. Its movement is associated to alternate conformations of a peptide, the neck linker, at the C‐terminal end of the motor domain. Recent progress in the understanding of its structural mechanism has been made possible by high‐resolution studies, by cryo electron microscopy and X‐ray crystallography, of complexes of the motor domain with its track protein, tubulin. These studies clarified the structural changes that occur as ATP binds to a nucleotide‐free microtubule‐bound kinesin, initiating each mechanical step. As ATP binds to a head, it triggers orientation changes in three rigid motor subdomains, leading the neck linker to dock onto the motor core, which directs the other head toward the microtubule (+)‐end. The relationship between neck linker docking and the orientations of the motor subdomains also accounts for kinesin's processivity, which is remarkable as this motor protein only falls off from a microtubule after taking about a hundred steps. As tools are now available to determine high‐resolution structures of motor domains complexed to their track protein, it should become possible to extend these studies to other kinesins and relate their sequence variations to their diverse properties.     

Kinesin's walk: Springy or gated head coordination?

Conventional kinesin (kinesin-1) is a motor protein that performs a vital function in the eukaryotic cell: it actively transports cargo to required destinations. Kinesin pulls cargo along microtubule tracks using twin linked motor domains (heads) that bind the microtubule, hydrolyse ATP, and alternately step forward. The detail of the kinesin walk has yet to be discovered but a prominent theory is that the mechanism is rectified Brownian motion (RBM) biased by linker zippering. There is evidence that an ATP binding gate coordinates the heads. The hypothesis proposed here is that the gate is unnecessary, that entropic linker strain is sufficient to enable procession. An agent-based computer simulation has been devised to explore head coordination in the RBM model. Walking was found to emerge in silico without a gate to synchronise the heads. Further investigation of the model by applying a range of hindering loads resulted in backstepping or detachment with similar characteristics to behaviour observed in vitro. It is unclear whether kinesin waits at an obstacle but adding an ATP hydrolysis gate to the model in order to force waiting resulted in the model behaving less realistically under load. It is argued here that an RBM model free of gating is a good candidate for explaining kinesin procession.     

Pressure-Induced Changes in the Structure and Function of the Kinesin-Microtubule Complex

Kinesin-1 is an ATP-driven molecular motor that “walks” along a microtubule by working two heads in a “hand-over-hand” fashion. The stepping motion is well-coordinated by intermolecular interactions between the kinesin head and microtubule, and is sensitively changed by applied forces. We demonstrate that hydrostatic pressure works as an inhibitory action on kinesin motility. We developed a high-pressure microscope that enables the application of hydrostatic pressures of up to 200 MPa (2000 bar). Under high-pressure conditions, taxol-stabilized microtubules were shortened from both ends at the same speed. The sliding velocity of kinesin motors was reversibly changed by pressure, and reached half-maximal value at ∼100 MPa. The pressure-velocity relationship was very close to the force-velocity relationship of single kinesin molecules, suggesting a similar inhibitory mechanism on kinesin motility. Further analysis showed that the pressure mainly affects the stepping motion, but not the ATP binding reaction. The application of pressure is thought to enhance the structural fluctuation and/or association of water molecules with the exposed regions of the kinesin head and microtubule. These pressure-induced effects could prevent kinesin motors from completing the stepping motion.     

Kinetics processivity and the direction of motion of Ncd.

The kinetic mechanism of the nonclaret disjunctional protein (Ncd) motor was investigated using the dimer termed MC1 (residues 209-700), which has been shown to exhibit negative-end directed motility (Chandra et al., 1993). The kinetic properties are similar to those of the monomeric Ncd motor domain (Pechatnikova and Taylor, 1997). The maximum steady-state ATPase activity of 1.5 s(-1) is half as large as for the monomeric motor. Dissociation constants in the presence of nucleotides showed the same trend but with approximately a two-fold decrease in the values: K(d) values are 1.0 microM for ADP-AlF(4), 1.1 microM for ATPgammaS, 1.5 microM for ATP, 3 microM for ADP, and 10 microM for ADP-vanadate (in 25 mM NaCl, 22 degrees C). The apparent second-order rate constants for the binding of ATP and ADP to the microtubule-motor complex (MtMC1) are 2 microM(-1) s(-1). Based on measurements at high microtubule concentrations the kinetic steps were fitted to the scheme,[see text] where N refers to one head of the dimer and T, D, and P stand for ATP, ADP, and inorganic phosphate. k(1) and k(-4) are the first-order rate constants of the transition induced by the binding of mant ATP and mant ADP respectively. ADP release is the main rate-limiting step in the MtMC1 mechanism. The binding of the MC1-mant ADP complex to microtubules released less than half of the mant ADP (alternating site reactivity). The second mant ADP is only released by the binding of nucleotides that dissociate the MtMC1 complex (ATP and ADP but not AMPPNP). The apparent rate constant for dissociation of the second mant ADP is four times smaller than the first and much smaller than the rate of dissociation of MtMC1 by ATP or ADP. These results are explained by a model in which MC1.ADP is first dissociated from the microtubule by ATP, followed by rebinding to the microtubule by the ADP-containing head. Ncd may follow a different reaction pathway than does kinesin, but the differences in rate constants do not explain the opposite direction of motion. The kinetic evidence and the high ratio of motile velocity to ATPase support a nonprocessive, low duty cycle mechanism for the Ncd motor.     

Configuration of the two kinesin motor domains during ATP hydrolysis

To understand the mechanism of kinesin movement we have investigated the relative configuration of the two kinesin motor domains during ATP hydrolysis using fluorescence polarization microscopy of ensemble and single molecules. We found that: (i) in nucleotide states that induce strong microtubule binding, both motor domains are bound to the microtubule with similar orientations; (ii) this orientation is maintained during processive motion in the presence of ATP; (iii) the neck-linker region of the motor domain has distinct configurations for each nucleotide condition tested. Our results fit well with a hand-over-hand type movement mechanism and suggest how the ATPase cycle in the two motor domains is coordinated. We propose that the motor neck-linker domain configuration controls ADP release.     

Point mutation of adenosine triphosphate-binding motif generated rigor kinesin that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transport

In the study of motor proteins, the molecular mechanism of mechanochemical coupling, as well as the cellular role of these proteins, is an important issue. To assess these questions we introduced cDNA of wild-type and site-directed mutant kinesin heavy chains into fibroblasts, and analyzed the behavior of the recombinant proteins and the mechanisms involved in organelle transports. Overexpression of wild-type kinesin significantly promoted elongation of cellular processes. Wild-type kinesin accumulated at the tips of the long processes, whereas the kinesin mutants, which contained either a T93N- or T93I mutation in the ATP-binding motif, tightly bound to microtubules in the center of the cells. These mutant kinesins could bind to microtubules in vitro, but could not dissociate from them even in the presence of ATP, and did not support microtubule motility in vitro, thereby indicating rigor-type mutations. Retrograde transport from the Golgi apparatus to the endoplasmic reticulum, as well as lysosome dispersion, was shown to be a microtubule-dependent, plus-end- directed movement. The latter was selectively blocked in the rigor- mutant cells, although the microtubule minus-end-directed motion of lysosomes was not affected. We found the point mutations that make kinesin motor in strong binding state with microtubules in vitro and showed that this mutant causes a dominant effect that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transports in vivo.     

A simulation model of the conventional kinesin based on the Driven-by-Detachment mechanism

Kinesins are molecular motors that unidirectionally move along microtubules using the chemical energy of ATP. Although the core structure of kinesins is similar to that of myosins, the lever-arm hypothesis, which is widely accepted as a plausible mechanism to explain the behaviors of myosins, cannot be directly applied to kinesins. Masuda has proposed a mechanochemical process called the ‘Driven-by-Detachment (DbD)’ mechanism to explain the characteristic behaviors of myosins, including the backward movement of myosin VI and the loose coupling phenomenon of myosin II. The DbD mechanism assumes that the energy of ATP is mainly used to detach a myosin head from an actin filament by temporarily reducing the affinity of the myosin against the actin. After the affinity is recovered, the detached head has potential energy originating from the attractive force between the myosin and the actin. During the docking process, the potential energy is converted into elastic energy within the myosin molecule, and the intramolecular elastic energy is finally used to produce the power strokes. In the present paper, the DbD mechanism was used to explain the hand-over-hand motion of the conventional kinesin. The neck linker of the kinesin is known to determine the directionality of the motility but, in this paper, it was assumed that the neck linker was not directly engaged in the power strokes, which were driven by the attractive force between the kinesin head and the microtubule. Based on this assumption, simple mechanical simulations showed that the model of a kinesin dimer processively moved along a microtubule protofilament, if the affinity of the kinesin against the microtubule is appropriately controlled. Moreover, if an external force was applied to the center of the kinesin dimer, the dimer moved backward along a microtubule, as observed in experimental motility assays.     

Microtubule-kinesin interface mutants reveal a site critical for communication

Strict coordination of the two motor domains of kinesin is required for driving the processive movement of organelles along microtubules. Glutamate 164 of the kinesin heavy chain was shown to be critical for kinesin function through in vivo genetics in Drosophila melanogaster. The mutant motor E164K exhibited reduced steady-state ATPase activity and higher affinity for both ATP and microtubules. Moreover, an alanine substitution at this position (E164A) caused similar defects. It became stalled on the microtubule and was unable to bind and hydrolyze ATP at the second motor domain. Glu(164), which has been conserved through evolution, is located at the motor-microtubule interface close to key residues on helix alpha12 of beta-tubulin. We explored further the contributions of Glu(164) to motor function using several site-directed mutant proteins: E164K, E164N, E164D, E164Q, and D165A. The results indicate that the microtubule-E164K complex can only bind and hydrolyze one ATP. ATP with increased salt was able to dissociate a population of E164K motors from the microtubule but could not dissociate E164A. We tested the basis of the stabilized microtubule interaction with E164K, E164N, and E164A. The results provide new insights about the motor-microtubule interface and the pathway of communication for processive motility.     

ADP-induced rocking of the kinesin motor domain revealed by single-molecule fluorescence polarization microscopy

Kinesin is an ATP-driven molecular motor protein that moves processively along microtubules. Despite considerable research, the detailed mechanism of kinesin motion remains elusive. We applied an enhanced suite of single- and multiple-molecule fluorescence polarization microscopy assays to report the orientation and mobility of kinesin molecules bound to microtubules as a function of nucleotide state. In the presence of analogs of ATP, ADP-Pi or in the absence of nucleotide, the kinesin head maintains a rigid orientation. In the presence of ADP, the motor domain of kinesin, still bound to the microtubule, adopts a previously undescribed, highly mobile state. This state may be general to the chemomechanical cycle of motor proteins; in the case of kinesin, the transition from a highly mobile to a rigid state after ADP release may contribute to the generation of the 8 nm step.     

Force generation in kinesin hinges on cover-neck bundle formation

In kinesin motors, a fundamental question concerns the mechanism by which ATP binding generates the force required for walking. Analysis of available structures combined with molecular dynamics simulations demonstrates that the conformational change of the neck linker involves the nine-residue-long N-terminal region, the cover strand, as an element that is essential for force generation. Upon ATP binding, it forms a beta sheet with the neck linker, the cover-neck bundle, which induces the forward motion of the neck linker, followed by a latch-type binding to the motor head. The estimated stall force and anisotropic response to external loads calculated from the model agree with force-clamp measurements. The proposed mechanism for force generation by the cover-neck bundle formation appears to apply to several kinesin families. It also elucidates the design principle of kinesin as the smallest known processive motor.     

Processivity of the Motor Protein Kinesin Requires Two Heads

A single kinesin molecule can move for hundreds of steps along a microtubule without dissociating. One hypothesis to account for this processive movement is that the binding of kinesin's two heads is coordinated so that at least one head is always bound to the microtubule. To test this hypothesis, the motility of a full-length single-headed kinesin heterodimer was examined in the in vitro microtubule gliding assay. As the surface density of single-headed kinesin was lowered, there was a steep fall both in the rate at which microtubules landed and moved over the surface, and in the distance that microtubules moved, indicating that individual single-headed kinesin motors are not processive and that some four to six single-headed kinesin molecules are necessary and sufficient to move a microtubule continuously. At high ATP concentration, individual single-headed kinesin molecules detached from microtubules very slowly (at a rate less than one per second), 100-fold slower than the detachment during two-headed motility. This slow detachment directly supports a coordinated, hand-over-hand model in which the rapid detachment of one head in the dimer is contingent on the binding of the second head.     

Insight into the molecular mechanism of the multitasking kinesin‐8 motor

Members of the kinesin‐8 motor class have the remarkable ability to both walk towards microtubule plus‐ends and depolymerise these ends on arrival, thereby regulating microtubule length. To analyse how kinesin‐8 multitasks, we studied the structure and function of the kinesin‐8 motor domain. We determined the first crystal structure of a kinesin‐8 and used cryo‐electron microscopy to calculate the structure of the microtubule‐bound motor. Microtubule‐bound kinesin‐8 reveals a new conformation compared with the crystal structure, including a bent conformation of the α4 relay helix and ordering of functionally important loops. The kinesin‐8 motor domain does not depolymerise stabilised microtubules with ATP but does form tubulin rings in the presence of a non‐hydrolysable ATP analogue. This shows that, by collaborating, kinesin‐8 motor domain molecules can release tubulin from microtubules, and that they have a similar mechanical effect on microtubule ends as kinesin‐13, which enables depolymerisation. Our data reveal aspects of the molecular mechanism of kinesin‐8 motors that contribute to their unique dual motile and depolymerising functions, which are adapted to control microtubule length.     

Feedback of the kinesin-1 neck-linker position on the catalytic site

Kinesin-1 motor proteins step along microtubules by a mechanism in which the heads cycle through microtubule-bound and unbound states in an interlaced fashion. An important contribution to head-head coordination arises from the action of the neck-linker that docks onto the core motor domain upon ATP binding. We show here that the docked neck-linker not only guides the microtubule-unbound head to the next microtubule binding site but also signals its position to the head to which it is attached. Cross-linking studies on mutated kinesin constructs reveal that residues at the interface motor core/docked neck-linker, among them most importantly a conserved tyrosine, are involved in this feedback. The primary effect of the docked neck-linker is a reduced microtubule binding affinity in the ADP state.     

A kinesin switch I arginine to lysine mutation rescues microtubule function

Switch I and II are key active site structural elements of kinesins, myosins, and G-proteins. Our analysis of a switch I mutant (R210A) in Drosophila melanogaster kinesin showed a reduction in microtubule affinity, a loss in cooperativity between the motor domains, and an ATP hydrolysis defect leading to aberrant detachment from the microtubule. To investigate the conserved arginine in switch I further, a lysine substitution mutant was generated. The R210K dimeric motor has lost the ability to hydrolyze ATP; however, it has rescued microtubule function. Our results show that R210K has restored microtubule association kinetics, microtubule affinity, ADP release kinetics, and motor domain cooperativity. Moreover, the active site at head 1 is able to distinguish ATP, ADP, and AMP-PNP to signal head 2 to bind the microtubule and release mantADP with kinetics comparable with wild-type. Therefore, the structural pathway of communication from head 1 to head 2 is restored, and head 2 can respond to this signal by binding the microtubule and releasing mantADP. Structural modeling revealed that lysine could retain some of the hydrogen bonds made by arginine but not all, suggesting a structural hypothesis for the ability of lysine to rescue microtubule function in the Arg210 mutant.     

Chemomechanical coupling of the forward and backward steps of single kinesin molecules

The molecular motor kinesin travels processively along a microtubule in a stepwise manner. Here we have studied the chemomechanical coupling of the hydrolysis of ATP to the mechanical work of kinesin by analysing the individual stepwise movements according to the directionality of the movements. Kinesin molecules move primarily in the forward direction and only occasionally in the backward direction. The hydrolysis of a single ATP molecule is coupled to either the forward or the backward movement. This bidirectional movement is well described by a model of Brownian motion assuming an asymmetric potential of activation energy. Thus, the stepwise movement along the microtubule is most probably due to Brownian motion that is biased towards the forward direction by chemical energy stored in ATP molecules.     

Modeling motility of the kinesin dimer from molecular properties of individual monomers

Conventional kinesin is a homodimeric motor protein that unidirectionally transports organelles along filamentous microtubule (MT) by hydrolyzing ATP molecules. There remain two central questions in biophysical studies of kinesin: (1) the molecular physical mechanism by which the kinesin dimer, made of two sequentially identical monomers, selects a unique direction (MT plus end) for long-range transport and (2) the detailed mechanisms by which local molecular properties of individual monomers affect the motility properties of the dimer motor as a whole. On the basis of a previously proposed molecular physical model for the unidirectionality of kinesin, this study investigates the synergic motor performance of the dimer from well-defined molecular properties of individual monomers. During cargo transportation and also in single-molecule mechanical measurements, a load is often applied to the coiled-coil dimerization domain linking the two motor domains ("heads"). In this study, the share of load directly born by each head is calculated, allowing for an unambiguous estimation of load effects on the ATP turnover and random diffusion of individual heads. The results show that the load modulations of ATP turnover and head diffusion are both essential in determining the performance of the dimer under loads. It is found that the consecutive run length of the dimer critically depends upon a few pathways, leading to the detachment of individual heads from MT. Modifying rates for these detachment pathways changes the run length but not the velocity of the dimer, consistent with mutant experiments. The run length may increase with or without the ATP concentration, depending upon a single rate for pure mechanical detachment. This finding provides an explanation to a previous controversy concerning ATP dependence of the run length, and related quantitative predictions of this study can be tested by a future experiment. This study also finds that the experimental observations for assisting loads can be quantitatively explained by load-biased head diffusion. We thus conclude that the dimer motility under resisting as well as assisting loads is governed by essentially the same mechanisms.