Choice,performance and heritability of performance of specialist and generalist insect herbivores towards cacalol and seneciphylline,two allelochemicals of Adenostyles alpina (Asteraceae)

We compared the effects of a sesquiterpene (ST, cacalol) and a pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA, seneciphylline), both occurring in Adenostyles alliariae, on food choice and performance of specialist and generalist insect herbivores which are all known to feed or live on A. alliariae. In choice experiments we investigated whether the compounds were preferred, deterrent or had no effect. All specialist species Aglaostigma discolor (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae), Oreina cacaliae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and O. speciosissima avoided feeding when confronted with the combination of compounds. Only larvae of A. discolor avoided the single ST treatment as well. Larvae of the generalist species Callimorpha dominula (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae), Cylindrotoma distinctissima (Diptera, Tipulidae) and Miramella alpina (Caelifera, Acrididae) generally avoided feeding from PA, ST and PAST treatments. The only exception were caterpillars of C. dominula which were indiscriminate towards PA when naive, and preferred to feed on the PA treatment when they had experienced the compound before. Performance, measured as the growth of larvae on the different treatments in a no choice situation over a period of 10–17 days, was not different between treatments in the specialist leaf beetles O. cacaliae and O. speciosissima. Their avoidance of the combination treatment in the choice experiments had no obvious effect on growth when forced to feed from the treatment. In the generalist C. dominula only the high concentration combination treatment (PAST) reduced growth of the larvae due to decreased consumption. In C. distinctissima we found reduced growth in all treatments except one (PA3%). Poor growth performance in C. distinctissima was due to postingestive physiological effects of all treatments and additionally to consumption reduction in high‐dose ST treatments. Genetic variability (broad sense heritability) of growth performance metabolism varied in accordance with the specialization degree of the species. O. cacaliae, the most specialized species, had no significant heritability; O. speciosissima, the less specialized specialist, had a heritability of 0.46; C. dominula, the PA adapted generalist species, had a heritability of 0.64; C. distinctissima, the generalist with no apparent adaptations, had a heritability of 0.84.     

Activation of the MAPKs ERK1/2 by cell swelling in turbot hepatocytes

Background information. Activation of MAPKs (mitogen‐activated protein kinases), in particular ERK1/2 (extracellular‐signal‐regulated kinase 1/2), has been reported to take place in a large variety of cell types after hypo‐osmotic cell swelling. Depending on cell type, ERK1/2 phosphorylation can then serve or not the RVD (regulatory volume decrease) process. The present study investigates ERK1/2 activation after aniso‐osmotic stimulations in turbot hepatocytes and the potential link between phosphorylation of these proteins and RVD. Results. In turbot hepatocytes, Western‐blot analysis shows that a hypo‐osmotic shock from 320 to 240 mOsm·kg^?1 induced a rapid increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation, whereas a hyper‐osmotic shock from 320 to 400 mOsm·kg^?1 induced no significant change in the phosphorylation of these proteins. The hypo‐osmotic‐induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was significantly prevented when hypo‐osmotic shock was performed in the presence of the specific MEK (MAPK/ERK kinase) inhibitor PD98059 (100 μM). In these conditions, the RVD process was not altered, suggesting that ERK1/2 did not participate in this process in turbot hepatocytes. Moreover, the hypo‐osmotic‐induced activation of ERK1/2 was significantly prevented by breakdown of extracellular ATP by apyrase (10 units·ml^?1), by inhibition of purinergic P₂ receptors by suramin (100 μM) or by calcium depletion using EGTA (1 mM) and thapsigargin (1 μM). Conclusions. In turbot hepatocytes, hypo‐osmotic swelling but not hyper‐osmotic shrinkage induced the activation of ERK1/2. However, these proteins do not seem to be involved in the RVD process. Their hypo‐osmotic‐induced activation is partially due to cascades of signalling events triggered by the binding of released ATP on purinergic P₂ receptors and requires the presence of calcium.