Sea urchin small RNA ribonucleoprotein particles: identification, synthesis, and subcellular localization during early embryonic development.

Small RNAs in sea urchins were examined in order to characterize developmental changes in their level, subcellular localization, synthesis, and association with proteins and other RNAs. Small RNAs such as the U snRNAs, 5S and 5.8S rRNAs, and 7S RNAs were identified by their mobility on highly cross-linked acrylamide gels. In addition, 7SL and U1 RNAs were identified by northern blot hybridization to cloned human and sea urchin probes, respectively. The level, subcellular localization, and association with proteins or RNA do not change for most small RNAs from fertilization to blastula, even though this is the time when the stored maternal pool of many small RNAs is being supplemented and replaced by embryonically synthesized RNAs. New embryonic synthesis of small RNAs was first detected at the 8-12 hr blastula stage. Although the predicted subsets of the total small RNA pool can be found in the appropriate subcellular compartments, newly synthesized small RNAs have a predominantly cytoplasmic localization: All of the newly synthesized small RNAs were found to be constituents of small RNPs. The RNPs containing newly synthesized small RNAs had sedimentation rates indistinguishable from their maternal counterparts. Thus, on the basis of sedimentation rate, no gross differences could be detected between maternal and embryonic small RNP pools. These small RNPs include a cytoplasmic RNP containing newly synthesized U1 snRNA and the sea urchin signal recognition particle (SRP) containing the 7SL, RNA. We have also identified a small RNP bearing the 5S rRNA which is present in both eggs and embryos. The presence of multiple, abundant, small RNAs and RNPs that are maintained at constant levels in particular subcellular fractions throughout development suggests that small RNAs may be involved in many more cellular activities than have so far been described.     

Tracking expression and subcellular localization of RNA and protein species using high-throughput single cell imaging flow cytometry

We report a high-throughput application of multispectral imaging flow cytometry (MIFC) for analyzing the expression and localization of both RNA and protein molecules in a heterogeneous population of cells. The approach was developed using polyadenylated nuclear (PAN) RNA, an abundant, noncoding RNA expressed by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) during the lytic phase of infection. High levels of PAN RNA are, in part, dependent on its interaction with poly(A)-binding protein C1 (PABPC1), which relocalizes from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of lytically infected cells. We quantitatively tracked the cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of PABPC1 and examined how this translocation relates to the expression and localization of viral RNA and protein molecules in KSHV-infected cells. This high-throughput approach will be useful for other systems in which changes in subcellular localization of RNA and protein molecules need to be monitored simultaneously.     

Vg1 RNA localization in oocytes in the absence of xVICKZ3 RNA-binding activity

Vg 1 RNA becomes localized at the vegetal cortex of Xenopus oocytes in a process requiring both intact microtubules (MT) and microfilaments. This localization occurs during a narrow window of oogenesis, when a number of RNA-binding proteins associate with the RNA. xVICKZ3 (Vg1 RBP/Vera), the first Vg1 RNA-binding protein identified, helps mediate the association of Vg1 RNA with MT and is co-localized with the RNA at the vegetal cortex. Given the complexity of the Vg1 RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, it has remained unclear how xVICKZ3 functions in Vg1 RNA localization. Here, we have taken a closer look at the process of xVICKZ3 localization in oocytes. We have made use of deletion constructs to perform a structure-function analysis of xVICKZ3. The ability of xVICKZ3-GFP constructs to vegetally localize correlates with their association to MT but not with Vg1 RNA-binding ability. We find that when the ability of xVICKZ3 to bind Vg1 RNA is inhibited by the injection of a construct that dominantly inhibits RNA binding, both the construct and Vg1 RNA still localize, apparently through their continued association with a Vg1 RNA-containing RNP complex. These results emphasize the importance of protein-protein interactions in both xVICKZ3 and Vg1 RNA localization.     

Ro60 and Y RNAs: structure,functions, and roles in autoimmunity

Ro60, also known as SS-A or TROVE2, is an evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding protein that is found in most animal cells, approximately 5% of sequenced prokaryotic genomes and some archaea. Ro60 is present in cells as both a free protein and as a component of a ribonucleoprotein complex, where its best-known partners are members of a class of noncoding RNAs called Y RNAs. Structural and biochemical analyses have revealed that Ro60 is a ring-shaped protein that binds Y RNAs on its outer surface. In addition to Y RNAs, Ro60 binds misfolded and aberrant noncoding RNAs in some animal cell nuclei. Although the fate of these defective Ro60-bound noncoding RNAs in animal cells is not well-defined, a bacterial Ro60 ortholog functions with 3′ to 5′ exoribonucleases to assist structured RNA degradation. Studies of Y RNAs have revealed that these RNAs regulate the subcellular localization of Ro60, tether Ro60 to effector proteins and regulate the access of other RNAs to its central cavity. As both mammalian cells and bacteria lacking Ro60 are sensitized to ultraviolet irradiation, Ro60 function may be important during exposure to some environmental stressors. Here we summarize the current knowledge regarding the functions of Ro60 and Y RNAs in animal cells and bacteria. Because the Ro60 RNP is a clinically important target of autoantibodies in patients with rheumatic diseases such as Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and neonatal lupus, we also discuss potential roles for Ro60 RNPs in the initiation and pathogenesis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.     

Independent localization of MAP2, CaMKIIα and β-actin RNAs in low copy numbers

Messenger RNA localization involves the assembly of ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs) and their subsequent transport along the cytoskeleton to their final destination. Here, we provide new evidence that microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKIIα) and β-actin RNAs localize to dendrites in distinct RNPs, which contain--unexpectedly--very few RNA molecules. The number of MAP2 molecules per particle is affected by synaptic activity and Staufen 2, indicating that RNP composition is tightly controlled. Our data suggest that the independent localization of individual RNAs in low copy numbers could contribute to tighter temporal and spatial control of expression in neurons and synapse-specific plasticity.     

PTB/hnRNP I is required for RNP remodeling during RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes

Transport of specific mRNAs to defined regions within the cell cytoplasm is a fundamental mechanism for regulating cell and developmental polarity. In the Xenopus oocyte, Vg1 RNA is transported to the vegetal cytoplasm, where localized expression of the encoded protein is critical for embryonic polarity. The Vg1 localization pathway is directed by interactions between key motifs within Vg1 RNA and protein factors recognizing those RNA sequences. We have investigated how RNA-protein interactions could be modulated to trigger distinct steps in the localization pathway and found that the Vg1 RNP is remodeled during cytoplasmic RNA transport. Our results implicate two RNA-binding proteins with key roles in Vg1 RNA localization, PTB/hnRNP I and Vg1RBP/vera, in this process. We show that PTB/hnRNP I is required for remodeling of the interaction between Vg1 RNA and Vg1RBP/vera. Critically, mutations that block this remodeling event also eliminate vegetal localization of the RNA, suggesting that RNP remodeling is required for localization.     

Two primate-specific small non-protein-coding RNAs in transgenic mice: neuronal expression, subcellular localization and binding partners

In a rare occasion a single chromosomal locus was targeted twice by independent Alu-related retroposon insertions, and in both cases supported neuronal expression of the respective inserted genes encoding small non-protein coding RNAs (npcRNAs): BC200 RNA in anthropoid primates and G22 RNA in the Lorisoidea branch of prosimians. To avoid primate experimentation, we generated transgenic mice to study neuronal expression and protein binding partners for BC200 and G22 npcRNAs. The BC200 gene, with sufficient upstream flanking sequences, is expressed in transgenic mouse brain areas comparable to those in human brain, and G22 gene, with upstream flanks, has a similar expression pattern. However, when all upstream regions of the G22 gene were removed, expression was completely abolished, despite the presence of intact internal RNA polymerase III promoter elements. Transgenic BC200 RNA is transported into neuronal dendrites as it is in human brain. G22 RNA, almost twice as large as BC200 RNA, has a similar subcellular localization. Both transgenically expressed npcRNAs formed RNP complexes with poly(A) binding protein and the heterodimer SRP9/14, as does BC200 RNA in human. These observations strongly support the possibility that the independently exapted npcRNAs have similar functions, perhaps in translational regulation of dendritic protein biosynthesis in neurons of the respective primates.     

L-bodies are RNA–protein condensates driving RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes

Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules are membraneless compartments within cells, formed by phase separation, that function as regulatory hubs for diverse biological processes. However, the mechanisms by which RNAs and proteins interact to promote RNP granule structure and function in vivo remain unclear. In Xenopus laevis oocytes, maternal mRNAs are localized as large RNPs to the vegetal hemisphere of the developing oocyte, where local translation is critical for proper embryonic patterning. Here we demonstrate that RNPs containing vegetally localized RNAs represent a new class of cytoplasmic RNP granule, termed localization-bodies (L-bodies). We show that L-bodies contain a dynamic protein-containing phase surrounding a nondynamic RNA-containing phase. Our results support a role for RNA as a critical component within these RNP granules and suggest that cis-elements within localized mRNAs may drive subcellular RNA localization through control over phase behavior.     

Roles of protein subunits in RNA-protein complexes: lessons from ribonuclease P

Ribonucleoproteins (RNP) are involved in many essential processes in life. However, the roles of RNA and protein subunits in an RNP complex are often hard to dissect. In many RNP complexes, including the ribosome and the Group II introns, one main function of the protein subunits is to facilitate RNA folding. However, in other systems, the protein subunits may perform additional functions, and can affect the biological activities of the RNP complexes. In this review, we use ribonuclease P (RNase P) as an example to illustrate how the protein subunit of this RNP affects different aspects of catalysis. RNase P plays an essential role in the processing of the precursor to transfer RNA (pre-tRNA) and is found in all three domains of life. While every cell has an RNase P (ribonuclease P) enzyme, only the bacterial and some of the archaeal RNase P RNAs (RNA component of RNase P) are active in vitro in the absence of the RNase P protein. RNase P is a remarkable enzyme in the fact that it has a conserved catalytic core composed of RNA around which a diverse array of protein(s) interact to create the RNase P holoenzyme. This combination of highly conserved RNA and altered protein components is a puzzle that allows the dissection of the functional roles of protein subunits in these RNP complexes.     

Unexpected roles for UPF1 in HIV-1 RNA metabolism and translation

The HIV-1 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) contains the major structural protein, pr55(Gag), viral genomic RNA, as well as the host protein, Staufen1. In this report, we show that the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) factor UPF1 is also a component of the HIV-1 RNP. We investigated the role of UPF1 in HIV-1-expressing cells. Depletion of UPF1 by siRNA resulted in a dramatic reduction in steady-state HIV-1 RNA and pr55(Gag). Pr55(Gag) synthesis, but not the cognate genomic RNA, was efficiently rescued by expression of an siRNA-insensitive UPF1, demonstrating that UPF1 positively influences HIV-1 RNA translatability. Conversely, overexpression of UPF1 led to a dramatic up-regulation of HIV-1 expression at the RNA and protein synthesis levels. The effects of UPF1 on HIV-1 RNA stability were observed in the nucleus and cytoplasm and required ongoing translation. We also demonstrate that the effects exerted by UPF1 on HIV-1 expression were dependent on its ATPase activity, but were separable from its role in NMD and did not require interaction with UPF2.     

The snoRNA domain of vertebrate telomerase RNA functions to localize the RNA within the nucleus.

Telomerase RNA is an essential component of the ribonucleoprotein enzyme involved in telomere length maintenance, a process implicated in cellular senescence and cancer. Vertebrate telomerase RNAs contain a box H/ACA snoRNA motif that is not required for telomerase activity in vitro but is essential in vivo. Using the Xenopus oocyte system, we have found that the box H/ACA motif functions in the subcellular localization of telomerase RNA. We have characterized the transport and biogenesis of telomerase RNA by injecting labeled wild-type and variant RNAs into Xenopus oocytes and assaying nucleocytoplasmic distribution, intranuclear localization, modification, and protein binding. Although yeast telomerase RNA shares characteristics of spliceosomal snRNAs, we show that human telomerase RNA is not associated with Sm proteins or efficiently imported into the nucleus. In contrast, the transport properties of vertebrate telomerase RNA resemble those of snoRNAs; telomerase RNA is retained in the nucleus and targeted to nucleoli. Furthermore, both nuclear retention and nucleolar localization depend on the box H/ACA motif. Our findings suggest that the H/ACA motif confers functional localization of vertebrate telomerase RNAs to the nucleus, the compartment where telomeres are synthesized. We have also found that telomerase RNA localizes to Cajal bodies, intranuclear structures where it is thought that assembly of various cellular RNPs takes place. Our results identify the Cajal body as a potential site of telomerase RNP biogenesis.     

Nuclear RNP complex assembly initiates cytoplasmic RNA localization

Cytoplasmic localization of mRNAs is a widespread mechanism for generating cell polarity and can provide the basis for patterning during embryonic development. A prominent example of this is localization of maternal mRNAs in Xenopus oocytes, a process requiring recognition of essential RNA sequences by protein components of the localization machinery. However, it is not yet clear how and when such protein factors associate with localized RNAs to carry out RNA transport. To trace the RNA-protein interactions that mediate RNA localization, we analyzed RNP complexes from the nucleus and cytoplasm. We find that an early step in the localization pathway is recognition of localized RNAs by specific RNA-binding proteins in the nucleus. After transport into the cytoplasm, the RNP complex is remodeled and additional transport factors are recruited. These results suggest that cytoplasmic RNA localization initiates in the nucleus and that binding of specific RNA-binding proteins in the nucleus may act to target RNAs to their appropriate destinations in the cytoplasm.     

Multiple Modes of Protein–Protein Interactions Promote RNP Granule Assembly

Eukaryotic cells are known to contain a wide variety of RNA–protein assemblies, collectively referred to as RNP granules. RNP granules form from a combination of RNA–RNA, protein–RNA, and protein–protein interactions. In addition, RNP granules are enriched in proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which are frequently appended to a well-folded domain of the same protein. This structural organization of RNP granule components allows for a diverse set of protein–protein interactions including traditional structured interactions between well-folded domains, interactions of short linear motifs in IDRs with the surface of well-folded domains, interactions of short motifs within IDRs that weakly interact with related motifs, and weak interactions involving at most transient ordering of IDRs and folded domains with other components. In addition, both well-folded domains and IDRs in granule components frequently interact with RNA and thereby can contribute to RNP granule assembly. We discuss the contribution of these interactions to liquid–liquid phase separation and the possible role of phase separation in the assembly of RNP granules. We expect that these principles also apply to other non-membrane bound organelles and large assemblies in the cell.     

Ribonucleoprotein localization in mouse oocytes

RNA molecules rarely function alone in cells. For most RNAs, their function requires formation of various ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. For example, mRNP composition can determine mRNA localization, translational repression, level of translation or mRNA stability. RNPs are usually studied by biochemical methods. However, biochemical approaches are unsuitable for some model systems, such as mammalian oocytes and early embryos, due to the small amounts that can be obtained for experimental analysis. In such cases, microscopic techniques are often used to learn about RNPs. Here, we present a review of immunostaining, fluorescence in situ hybridization with subcellular resolution and a combination of both, with emphasis on the mouse oocyte and early embryos models. Application of these techniques to whole-mount fixed oocytes and early embryos can provide information about RNP composition and localization with three-dimensional resolution.     

Raman Spectroscopy: A Conformational Probe in Biochemistr

RNA localization, the enrichment of RNA in a specific subcellular region, is a mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of cellular polarity in a variety of systems. Ultimately, this results in a universal method for spatially restricting gene expression. Although the consequences of RNA localization are well-appreciated, many of the mechanisms that are responsible for carrying out polarized transport remain elusive. Several recent studies have illuminated the roles that molecular motor proteins play in the process of RNA localization. These studies have revealed complex mechanisms in which the coordinated action of one or more motor proteins can act at different points in the localization process to direct RNAs to their final destination. In this review, we discuss recent findings from several different systems in an effort to clarify pathways and mechanisms that control the directed movement of RNA.     

NUFIP1 (nuclear FMRP interacting protein 1) is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein associated with active synaptoneurosomes

Fragile X syndrome, the most common cause of inherited mental retardation, is caused by the absence of FMRP (Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein). FMRP is an RNA binding protein reported to be involved in translational control, notably at postsynaptic sites of protein synthesis as a part of a multiprotein/mRNA complex. One of the FMRP interactors, NUFIP1, is an RNA binding protein with an expression profile matching that of FMRP. We now show that in the nucleus NUFIP1 is localized in the nuclear matrix in RNA-containing structures lying in the proximity of, but not overlapping with, sites of nascent RNA. NUFIP1 is also present in the cytoplasm, where it is associated with ribosomes, similarly to FMRP. In neurons NUFIP1 can be detected in functional synaptoneurosomes, colocalizing with ribosomes. Consistent with its subcellular localization in both nucleus and cytoplasm, we show that NUFIP1 contains a functional CRM1-dependent nuclear export signal and is able to shuttle between these two cellular compartments. These findings suggest the involvement of NUFIP1 in the export and localization of mRNA and, in association with FMRP, in the regulation of local protein synthesis near synapses.     

Developmental and regional expression and localization of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in RNA translocation.

RNA localization is a regulated component of gene expression of fundamental importance in development and differentiation. Several RNA binding proteins involved in RNA localization during development in Drosophila have been identified, of which Y14, Mago, Pumilio, and IMP-1 are known to be expressed in adult mammalian intestine. The present study was undertaken to define the developmental and regional expression of these proteins, as well as Staufen-1, in mouse intestinal cells and in other tissues and cell lines using RT-PCR, and localization using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Staufen-1, Y14, Mago-m, and Pumilio-1 were expressed in intestinal epithelial cells of both villus and crypt and in Caco-2 and IEC-6 cells. In contrast, expression of IMP-1 was age- and region-specific, showing clear expression in distal fetal and newborn intestine, but very low or no expression in adult. The mRNAs were cytosolic, with more apical than basal expression in enterocytes. Staufen protein showed a similar localization pattern to that of its cognate mRNA. Overall, the data suggest an essential role for these proteins in intestinal cells. Age and regional expression of IMP-1 may indicate a role in regulation of site-specific translation of intestinal genes or in RNA localization.