Syntheses, characterization, and DFT investigation of new mononuclear acetonitrile- and chloro-ruthenium(II) terpyridine complexes

A series of mononuclear acetonitrile complexes of the type [Ru(CH₃CN)(L)(terpy)]²⁺ {L = phen (1), dpbpy (3), and bpm (5)}, and their reference complexes [RuCl(L)(terpy)]⁺ {L = phen (2), dpbpy (4), and dpphen (6)} were prepared and characterized by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, UV-vis spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammograms (CV). Abbreviations of the ligands (Ls) are phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, dpbpy = 4,4′-diphenyl-2,2′-bipyridine, bpm = 2,2′-bipyrimidine, dpphen = 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, and terpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine. The X-ray structures of the two complexes 2 and 3 were newly obtained. The metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) bands in the visible region for 1, 3, and 5 in acetonitrile were blue shifted relative to those of the reference complexes [RuCl(L)(terpy)]⁺. CV for all the [Ru(CH₃CN)(L)(terpy)]²⁺ complexes showed the first oxidation wave at around 0.95 V, being more positive than those of [RuCl(L)(terpy)]⁺. The time-dependent-density-functional-theory approach (TDDFT) was used to interpret the absorption spectra of 1 and 2. Good agreement between computed and experimental absorption spectra was obtained. The DFT approach also revealed the orbital interactions between Ru(phen)(terpy) and CH₃CN or Cl⁻. It is demonstrated that the HOMO-LUMO energy gap of the acetonitrile ligand is larger than that of the Cl⁻ one.     

Synthesis, DNA-binding and photocleavage studies of ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)2(mitatp)] and [Ru(bpy)2(nitatp)]

Two new ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(mitatp)](ClO₄)₂1 and [Ru(bpy)₂(nitatp)](ClO₄)₂2 (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, mitatp = 5-methoxy-isatino[1,2-b]-1,4,8,9-tetraazatriphenylene, nitatp = 5-nitro-isatino[1,2-b]-1,4,8,9-tetraazatriphenylene) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H NMR, mass spectrometry and cyclic voltammetry. Spectroscopic and viscosity measurements proved that the two Ru(II) complexes intercalate DNA with larger binding constants than that of [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)]²⁺ (dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) and possess the excited lifetime of microsecond scale upon binding to DNA. Both complexes can efficiently photocleave pBR322 DNA in vitro under irradiation. Singlet oxygen (¹O₂) was proved to contribute to the DNA photocleavage process, the ¹O₂ quantum yields was determined to be 0.43 and 0.36 for 1 and 2, respectively. Moreover, a photoinduced electron transfer mechanism was also found to be involved in the DNA cleavage process.     

DNA-binding and photocleavage studies of mixed polypyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes with calf thymus DNA

New mixed polypyridyl {NMIP = 2′-(2″-nitro-3″,4″-methylenedioxyphenyl)imidazo-[4′,5′-f][1,10]-phenanthroline, dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine} ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(dmb)₂(NMIP)]²⁺ (1) and [Ru(bpy)₂(NMIP)]²⁺ (2) have been synthesized and characterized. The binding of these complexes to calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) has been investigated with spectroscopic methods, viscosity and electrophoresis measurements. The experimental results indicate that both complexes could bind to DNA via partial intercalation from the minor/major groove. In addition, both complexes have been found to promote the single-stranded cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA upon irradiation. Under comparable experimental conditions compared with [Ru(phen)₂(NMIP)]²⁺, during the course of the dialysis at intervals of time, the CD signals of both complexes started from none, increased to the maximum magnitude, then no longer changed, and the activity of effective DNA cleavage dependence upon concentration degree lies in the following order: [Ru(phen)₂NMIP]²⁺ > complex 2 > complex 1.     

Effect of ancillary ligands on the photophysical properties of Ru(II) complexes bearing a highly conjugated diimine ligand: A density functional theory study

Two bis-heteroleptic Ru(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(pcip)]²⁺ (1, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, pcip = 2-[4-phenylcarboxy]-1H-imidazol[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) and [Ru(phen)₂(pcip)]²⁺ (2, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), bearing highly conjugated diimine ligands, were prepared and isolated as their PF₆ salts. The bpy-derivative 1 showed better photophysical properties (emission quantum yield, lifetime of the emitting state, and the radiative decay rate constant) than the phen-compound 2. These results followed by theoretical calculations at DFT level established a comprehensive understanding between the structural parameters and the photophysical properties, as well as of the influence of π conjugation and the symmetry of the molecules on spectroscopic characteristics. These results provide fundamental photophysical data for selecting ancillary ligands in the design and improvement of Ru-based light-harvesting complexes.     

Ruthenium(II) mixed-ligand complexes containing 2-(6-methyl-3-chromonyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]-phenanthroline: Synthesis, DNA-binding and photocleavage studies

Two novel Ru(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(MCMIP)]²⁺ (1) and [Ru(phen)₂(MCMIP)]²⁺ (2) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; MCMIP = 2-(6-methyl-3-chromonyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]-phenanthroline) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, mass spectra and ¹H NMR. The DNA-binding properties of the complexes were investigated by absorption, emission, melting temperature and viscosity measurements. Experimental results indicate that the two complexes can intercalate into DNA base pairs. Upon irradiation at 365 nm, two Ru(II) complexes were found to promote the cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA from supercoiled form I to nicked form II, and the mechanisms for DNA cleavage by the complexes were also investigated.     

Electronic effects on the interactions of complexes [Ru(phen)2(p-L)] (L=MOPIP, HPIP, and NPIP) with DNA

In order to explore the electronic effects of Ru(II) complexes binding to DNA, a series of Ru(II) complexes [Ru(phen)₂ (p-MOPIP)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(phen)₂ (p-HPIP)]²⁺ (2), and [Ru(phen)₂(p-NPIP)]²⁺ (3) were synthesized and characterized by elementary, ¹H NMR, and ES-MS analysis. The binding properties of these complexes to CT-DNA were investigated with spectroscopic methods and viscosity experiments. Furthermore, the computations for these complexes applying the density functional theory (DFT) method have also been performed. The results show that all of these complexes can well bind to DNA in intercalation mode and DNA-binding affinity of these complexes is greatly influenced by electronic effects of intercalating ligands. The intrinsic binding constants for 1, 2, and 3 are 0.20, 0.69, and 1.56 × 10⁵ M⁻¹, respectively. This order is in accordance with that of the electron-withdrawing ability of substituent [-OR < -OH < -NO₂]. Such a trend in electronic effects of Ru(II) complexes binding to DNA can be reasonably explained by the DFT calculations.     

Design,synthesis, DNA-binding affinity,cytotoxicity, apoptosis,and cell cycle arrest of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes

A novel polypyridyl ligand CNPFIP (CNPFIP = 2-(5(4-chloro-2-nitrophenyl)furan-2-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5f][1,10]phenanthroline) and its mononuclear Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes of [Ru(phen)₂CNPFIP]²⁺(1) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), [Ru(bpy)₂CNPFIP]²⁺(2) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine), and [Ru(dmb)₂CNPFIP]²⁺(3) (dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) have been synthesized successfully and characterized thoroughly by elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR, NMR, and ESI-MS. The interaction of the Ru(II) complexes with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) was investigated by absorption titration, fluorescence, viscosity measurements. The experimental results suggest that three complexes bind to CT-DNA through an intercalative mode and the DNA-binding affinity of complex 1 is greater than that of complexes 2 and 3. The photocleavage of plasmid pBR322 DNA by ruthenium complexes 1, 2, and 3 was investigated. We have also tested three complexes for their antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli (Gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) bacteria. The in vitro cytotoxicity of these complexes was evaluated by MTT assay, and complex 1 shows higher cytotoxicity than 2 and 3 on HeLa cells. The induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of HeLa cells were investigated by flow cytometry for 24 h. The molecular docking of ruthenium complexes 1, 2, and 3 with the active site pocket residues of human DNA TOP1 was performed using LibDock.     

Synthesis and electrochemical studies of octahedral nickel β-diketonate complexes

The reaction of [Ni(tmhd)₂] and [Ni(dbm)₂] with N-donor chelating ligands in dichloromethane and acetone, respectively, yields the complexes [Ni(tmhd)₂(L-L)] (L-L = 2,2′-bpy 1, phen 2 and dmae 3) and [Ni(dbm)₂(L-L)] (L-L = 2,2′-bpy 4, phen 5, dmae 6). UV-Vis spectroscopy shows very strong bands in the UV region consistent with ligand centred π → π^∗ transitions. The electrochemical studies of 1-6 reveal oxidation to Ni(III). The [Ni(tmhd)₂(L-L)] 1-3 are more easily oxidized by ca. 300 mV and are quasi-reversible whereas for the [Ni(dbm)₂(L-L)] series only complex 6 shows significant reversibility. X-ray crystallographic studies have been conducted in the case of [Ni(dbm)₂(phen)] 5 and [Ni(dbm)₂(dmae)] 6. The structures both show that the nickel metal centre is octahedral with an O₄N₂ coordination environment. In the structures the β-diketonate ligands exhibit a cis-arrangement, with the metal displaced out of the planar chelate ring.     

Hydrogen-halide versus alkyl-halide oxidative addition in dimethyl platinum(II) complexes: Crystal structure of [PtBr2(bpy)]

Dimethyl platinum(II) complexes [PtMe₂(NN)] {NN = bu₂bpy (4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine) (1a), bpy (2,2′-bipyridine) (1b), phen (1,10-phenanthroline) (1c)} reacted with commercial 3-bromo-1-propanol in the presence of 1,3-propylene oxide to afford cis, trans- [PtBrMe₂{(CH₂)₃OH}(NN)] (NN = bu₂bpy (2a), bpy (2b), phen (2c)). On the other hand, [PtMe₂(NN)] (1a)-(1b) reacted with the trace of HBr in commercial 3-bromo-1-propanol to give [PtBr₂(NN)] (NN = bu₂bpy (3a), bpy (3b)). The reaction pathways were monitored by ¹H NMR at various temperatures. Treatment of 1a-1b with a large excess of 3-bromo-1-propanol at −80 °C gave the corresponding methyl(hydrido)platinum(IV) complexes [PtBr(H)Me₂(NN)] (NN = bu₂bpy (4a), bpy (4b)) via the oxidative addition of dimethyl platinum(II) complexes with HBr. The complexes [PtBr(H)Me₂(NN)] decomposed by reductive elimination of methane above −20 °C for bu₂bpy and from −20 to 0 °C for bpy analogue to give methane and platinum(II) complexes [PtBrMe(NN)] (5a)-(5b) and then decomposed at about 0 °C to yield [PtBr₂(NN)] and methane. When the reactions were performed at a molar ratio of Pt:RX/1:10, the corresponding complexes [PtBrMe(NN)] (5a)-(5b) were also obtained. The crystal structure of the complex 3b shows that platinum adopts square planar geometry with a twofold axis through the platinum atom. The Pt…Pt distance (5.164 Å) is considerably larger than the interplanar spacing (3.400 Å) and there is no platinum-platinum interaction.     

Experimental and DFT studies on the DNA-binding trend and spectral properties of complexes [Ru(bpy)2L] (L = dmdpq, dpq, and dcdpq)

The trend in DNA-binding affinities and the spectral properties of a series of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(dmdpq)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(dpq)]²⁺ (2), [Ru(bpy)₂(cndpq)]²⁺ (3) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; dpq = dipyrido[3,2-d:2′,3′-f]quinoxaline; dmdpq = di-methyl-dpq; dcdpq = di-cyano-dpq), have been experimentally and theoretically investigated. The DNA-binding constants K_b of the complexes were determined systematically with spectrophotometric titration. The density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations were carried out for these complexes. The experimental results show that these complexes bind to DNA in intercalation mode, and the order of their intrinsic DNA-binding constants K_b is K_b(1) < K_b(2) ? K_b(3). The substituents on the intercalative ligands of the complexes play a very important role in the control of DNA-binding affinities of the complexes, in particular, the stronger electron-withdrawing substituent (-CN) on the intercalative ligand can greatly improve the DNA-binding property of the derivative complex. The trend in DNA-binding affinities as well as the spectral properties of metal-ligand charge-transition (¹MLCT) of this series of complexes can be reasonably explained by applying the DFT and TDDFT calculations and the frontier molecular orbital theory.     

A theoretical study of Ru(II) polypyridyl DNA intercalators: Structure and electronic absorption spectroscopy of [Ru(phen)2(dppz)] and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)] complexes intercalated in guanine-cytosine base pairs

The structural and spectroscopic properties of [Ru(phen)₂(dppz)]²⁺ and [Ru(tap)₂(dppz)]²⁺ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; tap = 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene; dppz = dipyridophenazine ) have been investigated by means of density functional theory (DFT), time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) within the polarized continuum model (IEF-PCM) and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. The model of the Δ and Λ enantiomers of Ru(II) intercalated in DNA in the minor and major grooves is limited to the metal complexes intercalated in two guanine-cytosine base pairs. The main experimental spectral features of these complexes reported in DNA or synthetic polynucleotides are better reproduced by the theoretical absorption spectra of the Δ enantiomers regardless of intercalation mode (major or minor groove). This is especially true for [Ru(phen)₂(dppz)]²⁺. The visible absorption of [Ru(tap)₂(dppz)]²⁺ is governed by the MLCT_tap transitions regardless of the environment (water, acetonitrile or bases pair), the visible absorption of [Ru(phen)₂(dppz)]²⁺ is characterized by transitions to metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer MLCT_dppz in water and acetonitrile and to MLCT_phen when intercalated in DNA. The response of the IL_dppz state to the environment is very sensitive. In vacuum, water and acetonitrile these transitions are characterized by significant oscillator strengths and their positions depend significantly on the medium with blue shifts of about 80 nm when going from vacuum to solvent. When the complex is intercalated in the guanine-cytosine base pairs the ¹IL_dppz transition contributes mainly to the band at 370 nm observed in the spectrum of [Ru(phen)₂(dppz)]²⁺ and to the band at 362 nm observed in the spectrum of [Ru(tap)₂(dppz)]²⁺.     

Four metal-organic networks based on benzene-1,4-dioxyacetic acid and dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine ligand

Four structurally diverse complexes, [Cd(dppz)(bdoa)]_n (1), [Zn(dppz)(bdoa)(H₂O)]_n (2), [Fe(dppz)₂(bdoa)]_n·2nH₂O (3), and [Co₂(dppz)₂(bdoa)₂(H₂O)]_n·3nH₂O (4), where H₂bdoa = benzene-1,4-dioxyacetic acid and dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine, have been hydrothermally synthesized. Compounds 1-4 feature chain structures. There exist π-π interactions in the structures of 1, 2 and 4. Two neighboring chains of 1 are linked through the π-π interactions into a double chain supramolecular structure. The chains of 2 and 4 are further extended by the π-π interactions to form 3D and 2D supramolecular structures, respectively. The structural differences among such complexes show that the transition metals have important influences on their structures. The photoluminescent property of complex 2 and the magnetic property of complex 4 have also been investigated.     

Interaction of Pt(II) and Pd(II) complexes of terpyridine with 1-methylazoles: A combined experimental and density functional study

The synthesis and characterization of several complexes of the composition [{M(terpy)}_n(L)](ClO₄)_m (M = Pt, Pd; L = 1-methylimidazole, 1-methyltetrazole, 1-methyltetrazolate; terpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine; n = 1, 2; m = 1, 2, 3) is reported and their applicability in terms of a metal-mediated base pair investigated. Reaction of [M(terpy)(H₂O)]²⁺ with 1-methylimidazole leads to [M(terpy)(1-methylimidazole)](ClO₄)₂ (1: M = Pt; 2: M = Pd). The analogous reaction of [Pt(terpy)(H₂O)]²⁺ with 1-methyltetrazole leads to the organometallic compound [Pt(terpy)(1-methyltetrazolate)]ClO₄ (3) in which the aromatic tetrazole proton has been substituted by the platinum moiety. For both platinum(II) and palladium(II), doubly metalated complexes [{M(terpy)}₂(1-methyltetrazolate)](ClO₄)₃ (4: M = Pt; 5: M = Pd) can also be obtained depending on the reaction conditions. In the latter two compounds, the [M(terpy)]²⁺ moieties are coordinated via C5 and N4. X-ray crystal structures of 1, 2, and 3 are reported. In addition, DFT calculations have been carried out to determine the energy difference between fully planar [Pd(mterpy)(L)]²⁺ complexes Ip-IVp (mterpy = 4′-methyl-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine; L = 1-methylimidazole-N3 (I), 1-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-N4 (II), 1-methyltetrazole-N3 (III), or 3-methylpyridine-N1 (IV)) and the respective geometry-optimized structures Io-IVo. Whereas this energy difference is larger than 70 kJ mol⁻¹ for compounds I, II, and IV, it amounts to only 0.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for the tetrazole-containing complex III, which is stabilized by two intramolecular C-H?N hydrogen bonds. Of all complexes under investigation, only the terpyridine-metal ion-tetrazole system with N3-coordinated tetrazole appears to be suited for an application in terms of a metal-mediated base pair in a metal-modified oligonucleotide.     

Synthesis and characterisation of bis(2,2′-bipyridine)(4-carboxy-4′-(pyrid-2-ylmethylamido)-2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) di(hexafluorophosphate): Comparison of spectroelectrochemical properties with related complexes

The new complex, [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂ NHCO-bpy)](PF₆)₂ · 3H₂O (1), where 4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy is 4-(carboxylic acid)-4′-pyrid-2-ylmethylamido-2,2′-bipyridine, has been synthesised from [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ (H₂dcbpy is 4,4′-(dicarboxylic acid)-2,2′-bipyridine) and characterised by elemental analysis and spectroscopic methods. An X-ray crystal structure determination of the trihydrate of the [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)](PF₆)₂ precursor is reported, since it represented a different solvate to an existing structure. The structure shows a distorted octahedral arrangement of the ligands around the ruthenium(II) centre and is consistent with the carboxyl groups being protonated. A comparative study of the electrochemical and photophysical properties of [Ru^II(bpy)₂(4-HCOO-4′-pyCH₂NHCO-bpy)]²⁺ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(H₂dcbpy)]²⁺ (2), [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ (3), [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] (4) and [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂]⁺ (5) was then undertaken to determine their variation upon changing the ligands occupying two of the six ruthenium(II) coordination sites. The ruthenium(II) complexes exhibit intense ligand centred (LC) transition bands in the UV region, and broad MLCT bands in the visible region. The ruthenium(III) complex, 5, displayed overlapping LC bands in the UV region and a LMCT band in the visible. 1, 2 and 3 were found, via cyclic voltammetry at a glassy carbon electrode, to exhibit very positive reversible formal potentials of 996, 992 and 893 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺) respectively for the Ru(III)/Ru(II) half-cell reaction. As expected the reversible potential derived from oxidation of 4 (−77 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)) was in excellent agreement with that found via reduction of 5 (−84 mV (versus Fc/Fc⁺)). Spectroelectrochemical experiments in an optically transparent thin-layer electrochemical cell configuration allowed UV-Vis spectra of the Ru(III) redox state to be obtained for 1, 2, 3 and 4 and also confirmed that 5 was the product of oxidative bulk electrolysis of 4. These spectrochemical measurements also confirmed that the oxidation of all Ru(II) complexes and reduction of the corresponding Ru(III) complex are fully reversible in both the chemical and electrochemical senses.     

Cyclometalated ruthenium(II) complexes of benzo[h]quinoline (bzqH)[Ru(bzq)(NCMe)4], [Ru(bzq)(LL)(NCMe)2], and [Ru(bzq)(LL)2] (LL = bpy, phen)

Cyclometalation of benzo[h]quinoline (bzqH) by [RuCl(μ-Cl)(η⁶-C₆H₆)]₂ in acetonitrile occurs in a similar way to that of 2-phenylpyridine (phpyH) to afford [Ru(bzq)(MeCN)₄]PF₆ (3) in 52% yield. The properties of 3 containing ‘non-flexible’ benzo[h]quinoline were compared with the corresponding [Ru(phpy)(MeCN)₄]PF₆ (1) complex with ‘flexible’ 2-phenylpyridine. The [Ru(phpy)(MeCN)₄]PF₆ complex is known to react in MeCN solvent with ‘non-flexible’ diimine 1,10-phenanthroline to form [Ru(phpy)(phen)(MeCN)₂]PF₆, being unreactive toward ‘flexible’ 2,2′-bipyridine under the same conditions. In contrast, complex 3 reacts both with phen and bpy in MeCN to form [Ru(bzq)(LL)(MeCN)₂]PF₆ {LL = bpy (4) and phen (5)}. Similar reaction of 3 in methanol results in the substitution of all four MeCN ligands to form [Ru(bzq)(LL)₂]PF₆ {LL = bpy (6) and phen (7)}. Photosolvolysis of 4 and 5 in MeOH occurs similarly to afford [Ru(bzq)(LL)(MeCN)(MeOH)]PF₆ as a major product. This contrasts with the behavior of [Ru(phpy)(LL)(MeCN)₂]PF₆, which lose one and two MeCN ligands for LL = bpy and phen, respectively. The results reported demonstrate a profound sensitivity of properties of octahedral compounds to the flexibility of cyclometalated ligand. Analogous to the 2-phenylpyridine counterparts, compounds 4-7 are involved in the electron exchange with reduced active site of glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger. Structure of complexes 4 and 6 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.     

Synthesis and properties of red emitter Ru(II) complexes based on 6,6′-disubstituted-4,4′-bipyrimidine

Heteroleptic complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(R₂bpm)]²⁺, where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine and R₂bpm = 6,6′-diaryl-4,4′-bipyrimidine, have been synthesized and characterized, together with the homoleptic complex [Ru(R₂bpm)₃]²⁺, in which R₂bpm = 6,6′-diphenyl-4,4′-bipyrimidine. The substituent aryl on the bipyrimidine has significant effects on the properties of these complexes as compared to the parent [Ru(bpy)₂(bpm)]²⁺ complex. The complexes exhibit Ru-to-bpm charge transfer (CT) absorptions centered at about 540 nm and Ru-to-bpy CT absorptions centered at about 435 nm. The assignment of the low energy absorptions is supported by the relative ease of the reduction of the new complexes as compared to [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺. The new complexes exhibit a relatively intense emission at room temperature, with lifetimes in the 10-50 ns range, with the homoleptic species exhibiting the higher-energy (maximum at 724 nm) and the longest-lived (τ = 48 ns) emission among the complexes. Luminescence lifetimes and quantum yields are governed by the energy gap law, indicating that direct deactivation to the ground state is the dominant relaxation pathway for 1-6, while thermally activated processes are inefficient.     

New ruthenium(II) thiolato complexes: Synthesis, reactivity, spectral, structural and DFT studies

Ruthenium complexes [Ru(mpy)₂(DMSO)₂] (1) and [Ru(mbtz)₂(DMSO)₂] (2) containing 2-mercaptopyridine (mpy) and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (mbtz) have been synthesized. Reactivity of 1 have been examined with 2,2′-bipyridine (bipy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), EPh₃ (E = P, As) and 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)-methane (dppm). It reacted with bipy or phen in DMF to afford [Ru(mpy)₂(bipy)] (3) and [Ru(mpy)₂(phen)] (4) while, its reaction with EPh₃ or dppm in common organic solvents failed to afford products containing EPh₃ or dppm. Complexes under investigation have been characterized by elemental analyses, spectral, electrochemical studies and structures of 1-4 have been determined crystallographically. Density functional theory calculations have been performed on 1-4 and the model complex [Ru(mpy)(PMe₃)₂] (5) using exchange correlation functionals BP86. Optimized bond length and angles are in good agreement with the structural data. The Ru-N and Ru-S bond distances in [Ru(mpy)₂]-moiety of 1 are relatively shorter than 5, indicating higher stability of 1 in comparison to 5. The WBI values of Ru-N1, Ru-N2, Ru-S1 and Ru-S2 bonds indicate Ru-mpy bonding trend as 3 > 4 > 1 > 5. There is an overall charge flow in the direction L → [Ru(mpy)₂] (L = DMSO, bipy, phen and PMe₃). Due to greater ionic character and Pauli repulsive interactions for Ru-PMe₃ bond in comparison to Ru-DMSO, the DMSO ligands in 1 may not be substituted by phosphine ligands experimentally.     

Mixed-ligand silver(I) complexes containing bis[2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]ether and pyridyl ligands

The reaction of [Ag₂(κ²-P,P′-DPEphos)₂(μ-OTf)₂] (1) (DPEphos = bis(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]ether) with 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) and 4,4′-bipyridine in equimolar ratios afford, respectively, the mononuclear complex [Ag(κ²-P,P′-DPEphos)(phen)][OTf] (2) and the coordination polymer [Ag(κ²-P,P′-DPEphos)(μ-4,4′-bpy)]_n[OTf]_n (3). In complex 3, the silver atoms are bridged by 4,4′-bipyridine units to form a zigzag metallopolymer.     

Synthesis of novel mononuclear and dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes with terpyridine and acetylacetonate ancillary ligands and cyanamide derivative ligands

Several new mononuclear and dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes - incorporating 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine and acetylacetonate as ancillary ligands and phenylcyanamide derivative ligands - of the type [Ru(tpy)(acac)(L)] and [{Ru(tpy)(acac)}₂(μ-L′)] (where tpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, acac = acetylacetonate, L = hmbpcyd = 4-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbutynyl)phenylcyanamide anion (2) and epcyd = 4-ethynylphenylcyanamide anion (3) and L′ = bcpda = bis(4-cyanamidophenyl)diacetylene dianion (4) and bcpea = 9,10-bis(4-cyanamidophenylethynyl)anthracene dianion (5)) were synthesized in a stepwise manner starting from [Ru(tpy)(acac)(Ipcyd)] (1), where Ipcyd = 4-iodophenylcyanamide anion. Tetraphenylarsonium salts of the phenylcyanamide derivative ligands were also prepared. The four complexes have been characterized by UV-Vis, IR, ES-MS, electrochemistry and ¹H NMR. Mononuclear complexes 2 and 3 were further characterized by ¹³C NMR. The single crystal X-ray structure of 2 was determined, it crystallized with one molecule of water with empirical formula of C₃₂H₃₁N₅O₅Ru, in a monoclinic crystal system and space group of P2₁/n with a = 17.642(5) Å, b = 9.634(2) Å, c = 20.063(7) Å, β = 92.65(3)°, V = 3406(2) Å³ and Z = 4. The structure was refined to a final R factor of 0.040. The Ru(III/II) couple of 1-3 appeared around 0.34 V versus the saturated calomel electrode in dimethylformamide and at a slightly higher potential, around 0.36-0.37 V for 4 and 5. Spectroelectrochemical studies were also performed for 4 and 5, no intervalence transition was observed despite all attempts.     

X-ray structure and magnetic properties of dinuclear and polymer iron(II) complexes

Five new octahedral iron(II) complexes [FeL2(4-dpa)]_n(EtOH) (1), [FeL2(bipy)]_n(DMF) (2), [FeL1(bpee)]_n (3), [Fe₂L3(1-meim)₄](1-meim)₄ (4) and [FeL1(DMAP)₂] (5), with L1 and L2 being tetradentate coordinating Schiff base like ligands (L1 = (E,E)-[{diethyl-2,2′-[1,2-phenylenebis(iminomethylidyne)]bis[3-oxobutanato](2-)-N,N′,O³,O³′}, L2 = (3,3′)-[{1,2-phenylenebis(iminomethylidyne)]bis(2,4-pentane-dionato)(2-)-N,N′,O²,O²′}) and L3 being a octadentate dinucleating coordinating Schiff base like ligand ({tetraethyl-(E,E,E,E)-2,2′,2′′,2′′′-[1,2,4,5-phenylentetra(iminomethylidine)]tetra[3-oxobutanoato](2-)-N,N′,N′′,N′′′,O³,O³′,O³′′,O³′′′}); 4-dpa = di(4-picolyl)-amine, bipy = 4,4′-bipyridine, bpee = trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene, 1-meim = 1-methylimidazole and DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine, have been synthesized and characterised using X-ray structure analysis and T-dependent susceptibility measurements. Both methods indicate that all iron(II) centres are in the paramagnetic high-spin state over the whole temperature range investigated. The O-Fe-O angle, the so called bit of the equatorial ligand, is with an average of 111° in the region typical for high-spin iron(II) complexes of this ligand type. In the case of compound 1 an infinite two-dimensional hydrogen bond network can be found, for the compounds 2-4 no hydrogen bond interactions are observed between the complex molecules. A comparison of the curve progression obtained from the magnetic measurements of the mononuclear complex 5 and the polymeric complexes 1-3 leads to the conclusion that no magnetic interactions are mediated over the bridging axial ligands. For the dinuclear complex 4 weak antiferromagnetic interactions between the two iron centres are found.