Cardiovascular Risk of Resistant Hypertension: Dependence on Treatment-Time Regimen of Blood Pressure–Lowering Medications

In resistant hypertension, ingesting one or more blood pressure (BP)-lowering medications at bedtime is associated with significant reduction of sleep-time BP, a sensitive prognostic marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This randomized trial investigated if bedtime therapy with at least one hypertension medication exerts better BP control and CVD risk reduction than conventional, morning-time therapy with all medications. We conducted a prospective, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial on 776 patients (387 men/389 women) with resistant hypertension, 61.6?±?11.2 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age. Patients were randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or ≥1 of them at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48?h at baseline, and again annually or more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required. After a median follow-up of 5.4 yrs (range, .5–8.5 yrs), participants ingesting ≥1 hypertension medications at bedtime showed a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) of total CVD events (adjusted by age, sex, and diabetes) than those ingesting all medications upon awakening (.38 [95% CI: .27–.55]; number of events 102 vs. 41; p?<?.001). The difference between groups in the adjusted HR of major CVD events (a composite of CVD death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke) was also statistically significant (.35 [95% CI: .18–.68]; number of events 32 vs. 12; p?=?.002). At the last evaluation, patients treated with the bedtime versus awakening-time-treatment regimen showed significantly lower sleep-time systolic/diastolic BP mean values (121.6/65.4 vs. 113.0/61.1?mm Hg; p?<?.001) and higher prevalence of controlled ambulatory BP (61% vs. 46%; p?<?.001). The progressive decrease in the sleep-time systolic BP mean during follow-up was the most significant predictor of event-free survival (15% risk reduction per 5?mm Hg decreased asleep systolic BP mean). Among patients with resistant hypertension, ingestion of at least one hypertension medication at bedtime, compared with all medications upon waking, resulted in improved ambulatory BP control and fewer hard and soft CVD events. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Influence of Age and Hypertension Treatment-time on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

Some studies based on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) have reported a reduction in sleep-time relative BP decline towards a more non-dipping pattern in the elderly, but rarely have past studies included a proper comparison with younger subjects, and no previous report has evaluated the potential role of hypertension treatment time on nighttime BP regulation in the elderly. Accordingly, we evaluated the influence of age and time-of-day of hypertension treatment on the circadian BP pattern assessed by 48-h ABPM. This cross-sectional study involved 6147 hypertensive patients (3108 men/3039 women), 54.0?±?13.7 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, with 2137 (978 men/1159 women) being ≥60 yrs of age. At the time of study, 1809 patients were newly diagnosed and untreated, and 4338 were treated with hypertension medications. Among the later, 2641 ingested all their prescribed BP-lowering medications upon awakening, whereas 1697 ingested the full daily dose of ≥1 hypertension medications at bedtime. Diagnosis of hypertension in untreated patients was based on ABPM criteria, specifically an awake systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) BP mean ≥135/85?mm Hg and/or an asleep SBP/DBP mean ≥120/70?mm Hg. Collectively, older in comparison with younger patients were more likely to have diagnoses of microalbuminuria, chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, metabolic syndrome, anemia, and/or obesity. In addition, the group of older vs. younger patients had higher glucose, creatinine, uric acid, triglycerides, and fibrinogen, but lower cholesterol, hemoglobin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. In older compared with younger patients, ambulatory SBP was significantly higher and DBP significantly lower (p?<?.001), mainly during the hours of nighttime sleep and initial hours after morning awakening. The prevalence of non-dipping was significantly higher in older than younger patients (63.1% vs. 41.1%; p?<?.001). The largest difference between the age groups was in the prevalence of a riser BP pattern, i.e., asleep SBP mean greater than awake SBP mean (19.9% vs. 4.9% in older vs. younger patients, respectively; p?<?.001). The sleep-time relative SBP decline was mainly unchanged until ～40 yrs of age, and then significantly and progressively decreasing with increasing age at a rate of .28%/yr (p?<?.001), reaching a minimum value of 4.38%?±?.47% for patients ≥75 yrs of age. Treated compared with untreated patients showed lower awake and asleep SBP means, although the predictable changes of SBP and DBP with age were equivalent in both groups. As a consequence, there were no significant differences between untreated and treated patients in the changes of the sleep-time relative SBP and DBP declines with age. Additionally, the asleep SBP and DBP means were significantly lower and the sleep-time relative SBP and DBP declines significantly higher at all ages in patients ingesting ≥1 BP-lowering medications at bedtime as compared with those ingesting all medications upon awakening. Our findings document a significantly elevated prevalence of a blunted nighttime BP decline with increasing age ≥40 yrs. The prevalence of a riser BP pattern, associated with highest cardiovascular risk among all possible BP patterns, was 4 times more prevalent in patients ≥60 yrs of age than those <60 yr of age. Most important, there was an attenuated prevalence of a blunted nighttime BP decline at all ages when ≥1 hypertension medications were ingested at bedtime as compared with when all of them were ingested upon awakening. These findings indicate that older age should be included among the conditions for which ABPM is recommended for proper cardiovascular risk assessment. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Blunting of circadian rhythms and increased acrophase variability in sleep-time hypertensive subjects

24 h and ultradian rhythms of blood pressure (BP) have been previously shown to be disorganized in nocturnal hypertensive subjects. The present study was undertaken to further analyze the ultradian and circadian BP rhythm structure in sleep-time hypertensive subjects with normal or elevated awake-time BP levels. Fourier analysis was used to fit 24, 12, 8, and 6 h curves to mean BP as well as heart rate (HR) time series data derived from 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Awake and sleep periods were defined according to individual sleep diaries. Awake-time hypertension was defined as diurnal systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) means ≥135/85 mmHg. Sleep-time hypertension was defined as nocturnal SBP and/or DBP means ≥120/70 mmHg. The sample included 240 awake-time normotensive subjects (180 sleep-time normotensives and 60 sleep-time hypertensives) and 138 untreated awake-time hypertensive subjects (31 sleep-time normotensives and 107 sleep-time hypertensives). The amplitude and integrity (i.e., percent rhythm) of the 24 and 12 h BP rhythms were lower in the sleep-time hypertensive subjects and higher in the awake-time hypertensive subjects. However, no differences were detected when the integrity and amplitude of the 6 and 8 h mean BP rhythms were analyzed. The sleep-time hypertensive group showed significantly higher 24 h BP rhythm acrophase variability. No differences could be found in any of the HR rhythm parameters. Altogether, the findings suggest a disorganization of the BP circadian rhythm in sleep-time hypertensives that results in reduced 24 h rhythm amplitude and integrity that could be related to cardiovascular risk.     

Influence of Aspirin Usage on Blood Pressure: Dose and Administration-Time Dependencies

This study investigates the possible effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; aspirin) on systolic (S) and diastolic (D) blood pressure (BP) in healthy and mildly hypertensive subjects receiving ASA at different times according to their rest-activity cycle. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in 73 healthy young adult volunteers and 18 previously untreated subjects with mild hypertension. The BP of each subject was automatically monitored every 30 minutes for 48h before the trial and at the end of a one-week course of placebo and a one-week course of ASA. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to one of six groups, defined according to the dose of ASA (either 500 mg/day, the usual commercial dose; or 100 mg/day) and timing of ASA and placebo (within 2h after awakening, Time 1; 7h to 9h after awakening, Time 2; or within 2h of bedtime, Time 3). Subjects with mild hypertension the low dose of 100 mg/day ASA, as well as one week of placebo, and were randomly assigned to one of the same three groups defined above according to the time of treatment. A small (?2 mmHg in the 24h mean of SBP), but statistically significant, BP reduction was found when 500 mg/day ASA was given to healthy volunteers at Time 2. With 100 mg/day, the effect of ASA in healthy subjects was comparable to the BP reduction found with the higher dose for Time 2; there was again no effect on BP at Time 1, but we found a statistically significant effect at Time 3 (2.3 mmHg reduction in the 24h mean of SBP), larger than for Time 2. For hypertensive patients, the BP reduction was again statistically significant for Time 2 and, to a greater extent, for Time 3 (?4.5 mmHg for both SBP and DBP); all patients in these two groups showed a BP reduction after one week of ASA. The effect was about three times as large as the BP reduction obtained in healthy subjects treated with 100 mg/day ASA. Results indicate a statistically significant time- and dose-dependent effect of ASA on BP. In any meta-analysis of ASA effects, inquiries about the time when subjects took the drug are indicated and may account for discrepancies in the literature. Moreover, the influence of ASA on BP demonstrated here indicates the need to identify and control for ASA effects in patients using ASA before or during their participation in antihypertension medication trials. (Chronobiology International, 14(6), 619–637, 1997)     

Chronotherapy With Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination in Essential Hypertension: Improved Sleep-Time Blood Pressure Control With Bedtime Dosing

Administration of angiotensin receptor blockers at bedtime results in greater reduction of nighttime blood pressure than dosing upon awakening, independent of the terminal half-life of each individual medication. To obtain blood pressure (BP) target goals most patients require treatment with more than one hypertension medication. However, the potential differing effects on BP regulation of combination therapy depending on the time-of-day of administration have scarcely been investigated. Accordingly, the authors prospectively evaluated the administration-time-dependent BP-lowering efficacy of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy. The authors conducted a randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial on 204 subjects with essential hypertension (95 men/109 women), 49.7?±?11.1 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age. The BP of participants in this trial was not properly controlled with respect to published ambulatory BP criteria after initially randomized to valsartan monotherapy (160?mg/day), whether routinely ingested upon awakening by one group or at bedtime by another group for 12 wks. Thus, HCTZ (12.5?mg/day) was added to valsartan as a single-pill formulation, maintaining the original treatment-time, i.e., upon awakening or at bedtime, of participants of the two groups, for another 12 wks. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48?h at inclusion and after each 12-wk span of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately define the beginning and end of daytime activity and nocturnal sleep so that the respective BP means for every participant at each evaluation could be precisely determined. Combination therapy resulted in a similar statistically significant reduction of the 48-h BP mean from baseline for both treatment-time groups (17.0/11.5?mm Hg in systolic/diastolic BP after combination therapy on awakening; 17.9/12.1?mm Hg reduction after combination treatment at bedtime; p?>?.542 between groups). The awake BP mean was reduced to a comparable extent in both treatment-time groups (p?>?.682). However, bedtime compared to morning dosing better reduced the asleep means of systolic BP (20.1 vs. 16.0?mm Hg; p?=?.015) and pulse pressure (6.5 vs. 4.0?mm Hg; p?=?.007 between groups). Accordingly, the proportion of subjects with a baseline non-dipper BP profile was significantly reduced from 59% to 23% only after bedtime combination treatment (p?<?.001). Moreover, the proportion of subjects with properly controlled ambulatory BP after combination therapy was significantly greater with bedtime than upon-awakening treatment (55 vs. 40%, p?=?.037). The improved efficacy in lowering the asleep BP mean, increased sleep-time relative BP decline, and greater proportion of controlled patients suggest that valsartan/HCTZ combination should be preferably administered at bedtime for treatment of subjects with essential hypertension requiring combination therapy to achieve proper BP control. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Administration-Time Differences in Effects of Hypertension Medications on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Regulation

Specific features of the 24-h blood pressure (BP) pattern are linked to progressive injury of target tissues and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Several studies have consistently shown an association between blunted asleep BP decline and risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD events. Thus, there is growing focus on ways to properly control BP during nighttime sleep as well as during daytime activity. One strategy, termed chronotherapy, entails the timing of hypertension medications to endogenous circadian rhythm determinants of the 24-h BP pattern. Significant and clinically meaningful treatment-time differences in the beneficial and/or adverse effects of at least six different classes of hypertension medications, and their combinations, are now known. Generally, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are more effective with bedtime than morning dosing, and for dihydropyridine derivatives bedtime dosing significantly reduces risk of peripheral edema. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is highly circadian rhythmic and activates during nighttime sleep. Accordingly, evening/bedtime ingestion of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) benazepril, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, quinapril, ramipril, spirapril, trandolapril, and zofenopril exerts more marked effect on the asleep than awake systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP means. Likewise, the bedtime, in comparison with morning, ingestion schedule of the angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan exerts greater therapeutic effect on asleep BP, plus significant increase in the sleep-time relative BP decline, with the additional benefit, independent of drug terminal half-life, of converting the 24-h BP profile into a more normal dipping pattern. This is the case also for the bedtime versus upon-awakening regimen of combination ARB-CCB, ACEI-CCB, and ARB-diuretic medications. The chronotherapy of conventional hypertension medications constitutes a new and cost-effective strategy for enhancing the control of daytime and nighttime SBP and DBP levels, normalizing the dipping status of their 24-h patterning, and potentially reducing the risk of CVD events and end-organ injury, for example, of the blood vessels and tissues of the heart, brain, kidney, and retina. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Blunted Sleep-Time Relative Blood Pressure Decline Increases Cardiovascular Risk Independent of Blood Pressure Level—The “Normotensive Non-dipper” Paradox

Numerous studies have consistently shown an association between blunted sleep-time relative blood pressure (BP) decline (non-dipping) and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in hypertension. Normotensive persons with a non-dipper BP profile also have increased target organ damage, namely, increased left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness, reduced myocardial diastolic function, increased urinary albumin excretion, increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, and impaired glucose tolerance. It remains a point of contention, however, whether the non-dipper BP pattern or just elevated BP, alone, is the most important predictor of advanced target organ damage and future CVD events. Accordingly, we investigated the role of dipping status and ambulatory BP level as contributing factors for CVD morbidity and mortality in the MAPEC (Monitorización Ambulatoria para Predicción de Eventos Cardiovasculares, i.e., Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for Prediction of Cardiovascular Events) study. We prospectively studied 3344 individuals (1718 men/1626 women), 52.6?±?14.5 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, during a median follow-up of 5.6 yrs. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring (ABPM) for 48?h at baseline, and again annually or more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required in treated hypertensive patients. At baseline, those with ABPM-substantiated hypertension were randomized to one of two treatment-time regimen groups: (i) ingestion of all prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or (ii) ingestion of the entire dose of ≥1 of them at bedtime. Those found to be normotensive at baseline were untreated but followed and evaluated by repeated ABPM like the hypertensive patients. Participants were divided into four investigated categories on the basis of dipping status and ambulatory BP: (i) dipper vs. non-dipper, and (ii) normal ambulatory BP if the awake systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) BP means were <135/85?mm Hg and the asleep SBP/DBP means were <120/70?mm Hg, and elevated ambulatory BP otherwise. Cox survival analyses, adjusted for significant confounding variables, documented that non-dippers had significantly higher CVD risk than dippers, whether they had normal (p?=?.017) or elevated ambulatory BP (p?<?.001). Non-dippers with normal awake and asleep SBP and DBP means, who accounted for 21% of the studied population, had similar hazard ratio (HR) of CVD events (1.61 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.09–2.37]) as dippers with elevated ambulatory BP (HR: 1.54 [95% CI: 1.01–2.36]; p?=?.912 between groups). These results remained mainly unchanged for treated and untreated patients analyzed separately. Our findings document that the risk of CVD events is influenced not only by ambulatory BP elevation, but also by blunted nighttime BP decline, even within the normotensive range, thus supporting ABPM as a requirement for proper CVD risk assessment in the general population. The elevated CVD risk in “normotensive” individuals with a non-dipper BP profile represents a clear paradox, as those persons do not have “normal BP” or low CVD risk. Our findings also indicate the need to redefine the concepts of normotension/hypertension, so far established on the unique basis of BP level, mainly if not exclusively measured at the clinic, independently of circadian BP pattern. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Isolated-Office and True Resistant Hypertension Determined by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Hypertension is defined as resistant to treatment when a therapeutic plan including ≥3 hypertension medications failed to sufficiently lower systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures (BPs). Most individuals, including those under hypertension therapy, show a “white-coat” effect that could cause an overestimation of their real BP. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of “white-coat” or isolated-office resistant hypertension (RH) has always been evaluated by comparing clinic BP values with either daytime home BP measurements or the awake BP mean obtained from ambulatory monitoring (ABPM), therefore including patients with either normal or elevated asleep BP mean. Here, we investigated the impact of including asleep BP mean as a requirement for the definition of hypertension on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and estimated cardiovascular (CVD) risk of isolated-office RH. This cross-sectional study evaluated 3042 patients treated with ≥3 hypertension medications and evaluated by 48-h ABPM (1707 men/1335 women), 64.2?±?11.6 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, enrolled in the Hygia Project. Among the participants, 522 (17.2%) had true isolated-office RH (elevated clinic BP and controlled awake and asleep ambulatory BPs while treated with 3 hypertension medications), 260 (8.6%) had false isolated-office RH (elevated clinic BP, controlled awake SBP/DBP means, but elevated asleep SBP or DBP mean while treated with 3 hypertension medications), and the remaining 2260 (74.3%) had true RH (elevated awake or asleep SBP/DBP means while treated with 3 medications, or any patient treated with ≥4 medications). Patients with false, relative to those with true, isolated-office RH had higher prevalence of microalbuminuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD), significantly higher albumin/creatinine ratio (p <?.001), significantly higher 48-h SBP/DBP means by 9.6/5.3?mm Hg (p?<?.001), significantly lower sleep-time relative SBP and DBP decline (p?<?.001), and significantly greater prevalence of a non-dipper BP profile (96.9% vs. 38.9%; p?<?.001). Additionally, the prevalence of the riser BP pattern, which is associated with highest CVD risk, was much greater, 40.4% vs. 5.0% (p?<?.001), among patients with false isolated-office RH. The estimated hazard ratio of CVD events, using a fully adjusted model including the significant confounding variables of sex, age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, asleep SBP mean, and sleep-time relative SBP decline, was significantly greater for patients with false compared with those with true isolated-office RH (2.13 [95% confidence interval: 1.95–2.32]; p?<?.001). Patients with false isolated-office hypertension and true RH, however, were equivalent for the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, microalbuminuria, and chronic kidney disease, and they had an equivalent estimated hazard ratio of CVD events (1.04 [95% confidence interval: .97–1.12]; p?=?.265). Our findings document a significantly elevated prevalence of a blunted nighttime BP decline in patients here categorized as either false isolated-office RH and true RH, jointly accounting for 82.8% of the studied sample. Previous reports of much lower prevalence of true RH plus a nonsignificant increased CVD risk of this condition compared with isolated-office RH are misleading by disregarding asleep BP mean for classification. Our results further indicate that classification of RH patients into categories of isolated-office RH, masked RH, and true RH cannot be based on the comparison of clinic BP with either daytime home BP measurements or awake BP mean from ABPM, as so far customary in the available literature, totally disregarding the highly significant prognostic value of nighttime BP. Accordingly, ABPM should be regarded as a clinical requirement for proper diagnosis of true RH. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

The prevalence of obesity-related hypertension and risk for new vascular events in patients with vascular diseases

Higher body weight is associated with an increased prevalence of vascular risk factors. Obesity leads to hypertension by various mechanisms, often referred to as obesity-related hypertension. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and the vascular risk of the combination of obesity and hypertension in patients with vascular diseases. A cohort of patients with various clinical manifest vascular diseases (n = 4,868) was screened for vascular risk factors and followed (median follow-up 4.2 years) for the occurrence of vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death). The prevalence of obesity was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI) 17-19%) and the prevalence of hypertension was 83% (95% CI 82-84%). The prevalence of the combination of obesity and hypertension was 16% (95% CI 15-17%). Patients with high blood pressure (BP) combined with a high weight (highest tertile systolic BP (SBP) in the highest tertile BMI) were not at higher risk for new vascular events (hazard ratios (HR) 1.29; 95% CI 0.89-1.88) or mortality (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.81-1.73) compared to patients without high BP and high weight (patients in the lowest tertile of SBP in the lowest tertile of BMI). Patients with only high weight did not have an elevated risk either for vascular events (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.91-1.98) or mortality (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.81-1.83) compared to patients without high BP and high weight. The prevalence of the combination of hypertension and obesity is low in patients with vascular diseases and does not confer a higher risk for recurrent vascular diseases and mortality than each risk factor alone.     

INFLUENCE OF CIRCADIAN TIME OF HYPERTENSION TREATMENT ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK: RESULTS OF THE MAPEC STUDY

Clinical studies have documented morning-evening, administration-time differences of several different classes of hypertension medications in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, duration of action, safety profile, and/or effects on the circadian BP pattern. In spite of these published findings, most hypertensive subjects, including those under combination therapy, are instructed by their physicians and pharmacists to ingest all of their BP-lowering medications in the morning. The potential differential reduction of cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity and mortality risk by a bedtime versus upon-awakening treatment schedule has never been evaluated prospectively. The prospective MAPEC study was specifically designed to test the hypothesis that bedtime chronotherapy with ≥1 hypertension medications exerts better BP control and CVD risk reduction than conventional therapy, i.e., all medications ingested in the morning. A total of 2156 hypertensive subjects, 1044 men/1112 women, 55.6?±?13.6 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, were randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or ≥1 of them at bedtime. At baseline, BP was measured at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00?h and at 30-min intervals at night for 48?h. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every min by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the beginning and end of daytime activity and nocturnal sleep. Identical assessment was scheduled annually and more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required. Despite lack of differences in ambulatory BP between groups at baseline, subjects ingesting medication at bedtime showed at their last available evaluation significantly lower mean sleep-time BP, higher sleep-time relative BP decline, reduced prevalence of non-dipping (34% versus 62%; p?<?.001), and higher prevalence of controlled ambulatory BP (62% versus 53%; p?<?.001). After a median follow-up of 5.6 yrs, subjects ingesting ≥1 BP-lowering medications at bedtime exhibited a significantly lower relative risk of total CVD events than those ingesting all medications upon awakening (0.39 [0.29–0.51]; number of events 187 versus 68; p?<?.001). The difference between the treatment-time groups in the relative risk of major events (including CVD death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke) was also highly statistically significant (0.33 [0.19–0.55]; number of events: 55 versus 18; p?<?.001). The progressive decrease in asleep BP and increase in sleep-time relative BP decline towards a more normal dipping pattern, two novel therapeutic targets requiring proper patient evaluation by ambulatory BP, were best achieved with bedtime therapy, and they were the most significant predictors of event-free survival. Bedtime chronotherapy with ≥1 BP-lowering medications, compared to conventional upon-waking treatment with all medications, more effectively improved BP control, better decreased the prevalence of non-dipping, and, most importantly, significantly reduced CVD morbidity and mortality. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Association between light exposure at night and nighttime blood pressure in the elderly independent of nocturnal urinary melatonin excretion

Circadian misalignment between internal and environmental rhythms dysregulates blood pressure (BP) variability because of disruption of the biological clock, resulting in increased nighttime BP. Although exposure to light-at-night is associated with the circadian misalignment, it remains unclear whether exposure to light-at-night in home settings is associated with nighttime BP. In this cross-sectional analysis of 528 elderly individuals (mean age: 72.8 years), we measured bedroom light intensity at 1-min intervals on two consecutive nights along with ambulatory BP, overnight urinary melatonin excretion and actigraphy. With regard to adjusted mean comparisons using analysis of covariance, the light-at-night group (average: ≥5?lux; n?=?109) showed significantly higher nighttime systolic BP (SBP; adjusted mean: 120.8 vs. 116.5?mmHg, p?=?0.01) and diastolic BP (70.1 vs. 67.1?mmHg, p?<?0.01) compared with the Darker group (average: <5?lux; n?=?419) independently of potential confounding factors including overnight urinary melatonin excretion and actigraphic sleep quality. We observed consistent associations between light-at-night and nighttime BP in different cutoff values for light-at-night intensity (i.e. 3 and 10?lux). In conclusion, exposure to light-at-night in home settings is significantly associated with increased nighttime BP in elderly individuals independently of overnight urinary melatonin excretion. A 4.3?mmHg increase in nighttime SBP is associated with a 6.1% increase in total mortality, which corresponds to approximately 10?000 annual excess deaths in Japanese elderly population.     

Effects of Time-of-Day of Hypertension Treatment on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Generally, hypertensive patients ingest all their blood pressure (BP)-lowering agents in the morning. However, many published prospective trials have reported clinically meaningful morning-evening, treatment-time differences in BP-lowering efficacy, duration of action, and safety of most classes of hypertension medications, and it was recently documented that routine ingestion of ≥1 hypertension medications at bedtime, compared with ingestion of all of them upon awakening, significantly reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Non-dipping (<10% decline in asleep relative to awake BP mean), as determined by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), is frequent in diabetes and is associated with increased CVD risk. Here, we investigated the influence of hypertension treatment-time regimen on the circadian BP pattern, degree of BP control, and relevant clinical and analytical parameters of hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes evaluated by 48-h ABPM. This cross-sectional study involved 2429 such patients (1465 men/964 women), 65.9?±?10.6 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, enrolled in the Hygia Project, involving primary care centers of northwest Spain and designed to evaluate prospectively CVD risk by ABPM. Among the participants, 1176 were ingesting all BP-lowering medications upon awakening, whereas 1253 patients were ingesting ≥1 medications at bedtime. Among the latter, 336 patients were ingesting all BP-lowering medications at bedtime, whereas 917 were ingesting the full daily dose of some hypertension medications upon awakening and the full dose of others at bedtime. Those ingesting ≥1 medications at bedtime versus those ingesting all medications upon awakening had lower likelihood of metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease (CKD); had significantly lower albumin/creatinine ratio, glucose, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; and had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Moreover, patients ingesting all medications at bedtime had lowest fasting glucose, serum creatinine, uric acid, and prevalence of proteinuria and CKD. Ingestion of ≥1 medications at bedtime was also significantly associated with lower asleep systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) means than treatment with all medications upon awakening. Sleep-time relative SBP and DBP decline was significantly attenuated in patients ingesting all medications upon awakening (p?<?.001). Thus, the prevalence of non-dipping was significantly higher when all hypertension medications were ingested upon awakening (68.6%) than when ≥1 of them was ingested at bedtime (55.8%; p?<?.001 between groups), and even further attenuated (49.7%) when all of them were ingested at bedtime (p?<?.001). Additionally, prevalence of the riser BP pattern, associated with highest CVD risk, was much greater (23.6%) among patients ingesting all medications upon awakening, compared with those ingesting some (20.0%) or all medications at bedtime (12.2%; p?<?.001 between groups). The latter group also showed significantly higher prevalence of properly controlled ambulatory BP (p <?.001) that was achieved by a significantly lower number of hypertension medications (p?<?.001) compared with patients treated upon awakening. Our findings demonstrate significantly lower asleep SBP mean and attenuated prevalence of a blunted nighttime BP decline, i.e., lower prevalence of markers of CVD risk, and improved metabolic profile in patients with type 2 diabetes ingesting hypertension medications at bedtime than in those ingesting all of them upon awakening. These collective findings indicate that bedtime hypertension treatment, in conjunction with proper patient evaluation by ABPM to corroborate the diagnosis of hypertension and avoid treatment-induced nocturnal hypotension, should be the preferred therapeutic scheme for type 2 diabetes. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Comparison of the Effects on Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Awakening versus Bedtime Administration of Torasemide in Essential Hypertension

Torasemide is a high‐ceiling loop diuretic frequently used in the treatment of congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. Low doses of torasemide (2.5 to 5 mg/day) do not elevate 24 h natriuresis, and they constitute effective monotherapy for mild‐to‐moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension according to results based on clinic blood pressure (BP). However, there has yet to be a proper evaluation of its 24 h efficacy or potential dependency of effects according to the circadian time of treatment. Accordingly, this trial investigated the administration time‐dependent efficacy of torasemide in uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients. We studied a total of 113 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 51.7±10.6 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive torasemide (5 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after six weeks of treatment. The efficacy of torasemide was significantly greater with bedtime dosing (i.e., 14.8 and 9.5 mmHg reduction in the 24 h mean systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) as compared with morning dosing upon awakening (i.e., 6.4 and 3.4 mmHg reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP; p<0.001 between the two treatment‐time groups). The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory BP after treatment was also higher after bedtime treatment (64 vs. 23%; p<0.001). Safety and tolerability were comparable between the two treatment‐time groups. A dose of 5 mg/day torasemide is more effective for BP reduction for uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients when ingested at bedtime than in the morning upon arising. The difference in antihypertensive efficacy as a function of the circadian dosing‐time of torasemide here documented should be taken into account when prescribing this loop diuretic to treat essential hypertensive patients.     

Guidelines for the design and conduct of human clinical trials on ingestion-time differences – chronopharmacology and chronotherapy – of hypertension medications

ABSTRACT

Current hypertension guidelines fail to provide a recommendation on when-to-treat, thus disregarding relevant circadian rhythms that regulate blood pressure (BP) level and 24 h patterning and medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The ideal purpose of ingestion-time (chronopharmacology, i.e. biological rhythm-dependent effects on the kinetics and dynamics of medications, and chronotherapy, i.e. the timing of pharmaceutical and other treatments to optimize efficacy and safety) trials should be to explore the potential impact of endogenous circadian rhythms on the effects of medications. Such investigations and outcome trials mandate adherence to the basic standards of human chronobiology research. In-depth review of the more than 150 human hypertension pharmacology and therapeutic trials published since 1974 that address the differential impact of upon-waking/morning versus at-bedtime/evening schedule of treatment reveals diverse protocols of sometimes suboptimal or defective design and conduct. Many have been “time-of-day,” i.e. morning versus evening, rather than circadian-time-based, and some relied on wake-time office BP rather than around-the-clock ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Additionally, most past studies have been of too small sample size and thus statistically underpowered. As of yet, there has been no consensual agreement on the proper design, methods and conduct of such trials. This Position Statement recommends ingestion-time hypertension trials to follow minimum guidelines: (i) Recruitment of participants should be restricted to hypertensive individuals diagnosed according to ABPM diagnostic thresholds and of a comparable activity/sleep routine. (ii) Tested treatment-times should be selected according to internal biological time, expressed by the awakening and bed times of the sleep/wake cycle. (iii) ABPM should be the primary or sole method of BP assessment. (iv) The minimum-required features for analysis of the ABPM-determined 24 h BP pattern ought to be the asleep (not “nighttime”) BP mean and sleep-time relative BP decline, calculated in reference to the activity/rest cycle per individual. (v) ABPM-obtained BP means should be derived by the so-called adjusted calculation procedure, not by inaccurate arithmetic averages. (vi) ABPM should be performed with validated and calibrated devices at least hourly throughout two or more consecutive 24 h periods (48 h in total) to achieve the highest reproducibility of mean wake-time, sleep-time and 48 h BP values plus the reliable classification of dipping status. (vii) Calculation of minimum required sample size in adherence with proper statistical methods must be provided. (viii) Hypertension chronopharmacology and chronotherapy trials should preferably be randomized double-blind, randomized open-label with blinded-endpoint, or crossover in design, the latter with sufficient washout period between tested treatment-time regimens.     

Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome,Circadian Treatment Time,and Blood Pressure Non-Dipping Profile in Essential Hypertension

There is a strong association between metabolic syndrome (MS) and increased cardiovascular risk. Moreover, elevated nighttime blood pressure (BP) and non-dipping (subjects with <10% decline in the asleep relative to the awake BP mean) have been also linked to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We investigated the relation between MS, circadian time of hypertension treatment, and impaired nighttime BP decline in a cross-sectional study on 3352 (1576 men/1776 women) non-diabetic hypertensive subjects, 53.7?±?13.1 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age. Among them, 2056 were ingesting all their prescribed hypertension medication upon awakening, and 1296 were ingesting at least one of their BP medications at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours to substantiate reproducibility of the dipping pattern. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate mean BP when awake and asleep for each subject. MS was present in 52.6% of the subjects. The prevalence of an altered non-dipper BP profile was significantly higher among subjects with MS (52.0% vs. 39.5% in subjects without MS, p < .001). Non-dipping was significantly more prevalent among subjects ingesting all BP-lowering medications upon awakening (56.8%) than among those ingesting at least one of their BP medications at bedtime (29.1%; p < .001). Subjects with MS had significantly higher values of uric acid (6.0 vs. 5.3?mg/dL, p < .001), plasma fibrinogen (331 vs. 315?mg/dL, p < .001), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (14.8 vs. 12.4?mm, p < .001). Non-dipping was significantly associated with the presence of MS and treatment upon awakening in a multiple logistic regression model adjusted by significant confounding factors, including age, creatinine, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and cigarette smoking. This cross-sectional study documents a significant increase of a blunted sleep-time BP decline in treated hypertensive subjects with MS. Even in the presence of MS, treatment at bedtime is significantly associated with lower prevalence of a high-risk non-dipper BP profile. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Sleep-time ambulatory blood pressure as a prognostic marker of vascular and other risks and therapeutic target for prevention by hypertension chronotherapy: Rationale and design of the Hygia Project

This article describes the rationale, objectives, design and conduct of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-based Hygia Project. Given the substantial evidence of the significantly better prognostic value of ABPM compared to clinic BP measurements, several international guidelines now propose ABPM as a requirement to confirm the office diagnosis of hypertension. Nonetheless, all previous ABPM outcome investigations, except the Monitorización Ambulatoria para Predicción de Eventos Cardiovasculares study (MAPEC) study, relied upon only a single, low-reproducible 24 h ABPM assessment per participant done at study inclusion, thus precluding the opportunity to explore the potential reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with modification of prognostic ABPM-derived parameters by hypertension therapy. The findings of the single-center MAPEC study, based upon periodic systematic 48 h ABPM evaluation of all participants during a median follow-up of 5.6 years, constitute the first proof-of-concept evidence that the progressive reduction of the asleep systolic blood pressure (SBP) mean and correction of the sleep-time relative SBP decline toward the normal dipper BP profile, most efficiently accomplished by a bedtime hypertension treatment strategy, best attenuates the risk of CVD, stroke and development of new-onset diabetes. The Hygia Project, primarily designed to extend the use of ABPM in primary care as a requirement for diagnosis of hypertension, evaluation of response to treatment and individualized assessment of CVD and other risks, is a research network presently composed of 40 clinical sites and 292 investigators. Its main objectives are to (i) investigate whether specific treatment-induced changes in ABPM-derived parameters reduce risk of CVD events, stroke, new-onset diabetes and/or development of chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (ii) test the hypothesis that bedtime chronotherapy entailing the entire daily dose of ≥1 conventional hypertension medications exerts better ambulatory BP control and CVD, metabolic and renal risk reduction than all such medications ingested in the morning upon awakening. Between 2007 and 2015, investigators recruited 18 078 persons [9769 men/8309 women, 59.1 ± 14.3 years of age (mean ± SD)], including 15 764 with hypertension according to ABPM criteria as participants in the prospective randomized chronotherapy trial. The initial evaluation includes 48 h ABPM, detailed medical history and screening laboratory blood and urine tests. The same evaluation procedure is scheduled annually, or more frequently when treatment adjustment is required for proper ambulatory BP control, targeting a median follow-up of >5 years. The primary CVD outcome end point is the composite of CVD death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, heart failure, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The independent Hygia Project Events Committee periodically evaluates blinded clinical reports to ascertain and certify every documented event. Beyond the potential findings resulting from testing the main hypotheses, the Hygia Project has already demonstrated, as proof of concept, that the routine diagnosis of hypertension and individualized assessment of CVD and other risks by ABPM, as currently recommended, is fully viable in the primary care setting, where most people with either hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes or CKD receive routine medical attention.     

Single Agent Antihypertensive Therapy and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Behaviour in Older Adults Using Beat-to-Beat Measurements: The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing

Background

Impaired blood pressure (BP) stabilisation after standing, defined using beat-to-beat measurements, has been shown to predict important health outcomes. We aimed to define the relationship between individual classes of antihypertensive agent and BP stabilisation among hypertensive older adults.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, a cohort study of Irish adults aged 50 years and over. Beat-to-beat BP was recorded in participants undergoing an active stand test. We defined grade 1 hypertension according to European Society of Cardiology criteria (systolic BP [SBP] 140-159mmHg ± diastolic BP [DBP] 90-99mmHg). Outcomes were: (i) initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH) (SBP drop ≥40mmHg ± DBP drop ≥20mmHg within 15 seconds [s] of standing accompanied by symptoms); (ii) sustained OH (SBP drop ≥20mmHg ± DBP drop ≥10mmHg from 60 to 110s inclusive); (iii) impaired BP stabilisation (SBP drop ≥20mmHg ± DBP drop ≥10mmHg at any 10s interval during the test). Outcomes were assessed using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.

Results

A total of 536 hypertensive participants were receiving monotherapy with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitor (n = 317, 59.1%), beta-blocker (n = 89, 16.6%), calcium channel blocker (n = 89, 16.6%) or diuretic (n = 41, 7.6%). A further 783 untreated participants met criteria for grade 1 hypertension. Beta-blockers were associated with increased odds of initial OH (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31–3.21) and sustained OH (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.87–6.03) versus untreated grade 1 hypertension. Multivariable adjustment did not attenuate the results. Impaired BP stabilisation was evident at 20s (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.58–4.25) and persisted at 110s (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.64–5.11). No association was found between the other agents and any study outcome.

Conclusion

Beta-blocker monotherapy was associated with a >2-fold increased odds of initial OH and a >3-fold increased odds of sustained OH and impaired BP stabilisation, compared to untreated grade 1 hypertension. These findings support existing literature questioning the role of beta-blockers as first line agents for essential hypertension.     

CHRONOTHERAPY WITH VALSARTAN/AMLODIPINE FIXED COMBINATION: IMPROVED BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL OF ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION WITH BEDTIME DOSING

Administration of valsartan at bedtime as opposed to upon wakening improves the sleep-time relative blood pressure (BP) decline towards a more normal dipper pattern without loss of 24-h efficacy. Amlodipine, however, has been shown to be effective in reducing BP throughout the day and night, independent of dosing time. A large proportion of hypertensive subjects cannot be properly controlled with a single medication. However, no study has yet investigated the potential differing effects of combination therapy depending of the time-of-day of administration. Accordingly, the authors investigated the administration-time-dependent BP-lowering efficacy of valsartan/amlodipine combination. The authors studied 203 hypertensive subjects (92 men/111 women), 56.7?±?12.5 yrs of age, randomized to receive valsartan (160?mg/day) and amlodipine (5?mg/day) in one of the following four therapeutic schemes: both medications on awakening, both at bedtime, either one administered on awakening and the other at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after 12 wks of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every min by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the beginning and end of daytime activity and nocturnal sleep. BP-lowering efficacy (quantified in terms of reduction of the 48-h mean of systolic/diastolic BP) was highest when both hypertension medications were ingested at bedtime, as compared to any one of the three other tested therapeutic schemes (17.4/13.4?mm Hg reduction with both medications on awakening; 15.1/9.6?mm Hg with valsartan on awakening and amlodipine at bedtime; 18.2/12.3?mm Hg with valsartan at bedtime and amlodipine on awakening; 24.7/13.5?mm Hg with both medications at bedtime; p?<?.018 between groups). The sleep-time relative BP decline was significantly increased towards a more normal dipper pattern only when both medications were jointly ingested at bedtime (p?<?.001). Bedtime dosing of the combination of the two medications also resulted in the largest percentage of controlled subjects among all the assessed therapeutic schemes (p?=?.003 between groups). In subjects requiring combination therapy to achieve proper BP control, the association of amlodipine and valsartan efficiently reduces BP for the entire 24?h independent of dosing time. However, the greater proportion of controlled patients, improved efficacy on lowering asleep BP mean, and increased sleep-time relative BP decline suggest valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy should be preferably administered at bedtime. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es).     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Importance of Sampling Rate and Duration—48 Versus 24 Hours—on the Accurate Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk

Independent prospective studies have found that ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is more closely correlated with target organ damage and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk than clinic BP measurement. This is based on studies in which BP was sampled every 15–30?min for ≤24?h, without taking into account that reproducibility of any estimated parameter from a time series to be potentially used for CVD risk assessment might depend more on monitoring duration than on sampling rate. Herein, we evaluated the influence of duration (48 vs. 24?h) and sampling rate of BP measurements (form every 20–30?min up to every 2?h) on the prognostic value of ABPM-derived parameters. We prospectively studied 3344 subjects (1718 men/1626 women), 52.6?±?14.5 yrs of age, during a median follow-up of 5.6 yrs. Those with hypertension at baseline were randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or ≥1 of them at bedtime. At baseline, BP was measured at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00?h and at 30-min intervals at night for 48?h, and physical activity was simultaneously monitored every min by wrist actigraphy to accurately derive the awake and asleep BP means. Identical assessment was scheduled annually and more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required. ABPM profiles were modified to generate time series of identical 48-h duration but with data sampled at 1- or 2-h intervals, or shorter, i.e., first 24?h, time series with data sampled at the original rate (daytime 20-min intervals/nighttime 30-min intervals). Bland-Altman plots indicated that the range of individual differences in the estimated awake and asleep systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) means between the original and modified ABPM profiles was up to 3-fold smaller for data sampled every 1?h for 48?h than for data sampled every 20–30?min for the first 24?h. Reduction of ABPM duration to just 24?h resulted in error of the estimated asleep SBP mean, the most significant prognostic marker of CVD events, in the range of ?21.4 to +23.9?mm Hg. Cox proportional-hazard analyses adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, anemia, and chronic kidney disease revealed comparable hazard ratios (HRs) for mean BP values and sleep-time relative BP decline derived from the original complete 48-h ABPM profiles and those modified to simulate a sampling rate of one BP measurement every 1 or 2?h. The HRs, however, were markedly overestimated for SBP and underestimated for DBP when the duration of ABPM was reduced from 48 to only 24?h. This study on subjects evaluated prospectively by 48-h ABPM documents that reproducibility in the estimates of prognostic ABPM-derived parameters depends markedly on duration of monitoring, and only to a lesser extent on sampling rate. The HR of CVD events associated with increased ambulatory BP is poorly estimated by relying on 24-h ABPM, indicating ABPM for only 24?h may be insufficient for proper diagnosis of hypertension, identification of dipping status, evaluation of treatment efficacy, and, most important, CVD risk stratification. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)