Directed evolution of human T cell receptor CDR2 residues by phage display dramatically enhances affinity for cognate peptide-MHC without increasing apparent cross-reactivity

The mammalian alpha/beta T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire plays a pivotal role in adaptive immunity by recognizing short, processed, peptide antigens bound in the context of a highly diverse family of cell-surface major histocompatibility complexes (pMHCs). Despite the extensive TCR-MHC interaction surface, peptide-independent cross-reactivity of native TCRs is generally avoided through cell-mediated selection of molecules with low inherent affinity for MHC. Here we show that, contrary to expectations, the germ line-encoded complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of human TCRs, namely the CDR2s, which appear to contact only the MHC surface and not the bound peptide, can be engineered to yield soluble low nanomolar affinity ligands that retain a surprisingly high degree of specificity for the cognate pMHC target. Structural investigation of one such CDR2 mutant implicates shape complementarity of the mutant CDR2 contact interfaces as being a key determinant of the increased affinity. Our results suggest that manipulation of germ line CDR2 loops may provide a useful route to the production of high-affinity TCRs with therapeutic and diagnostic potential.     

Different thermodynamic binding mechanisms and peptide fine specificities associated with a panel of structurally similar high-affinity T cell receptors

To understand the mechanisms that govern T cell receptor (TCR)-peptide MHC (pMHC) binding and the role that different regions of the TCR play in affinity and antigen specificity, we have studied the TCR from T cell clone 2C. High-affinity mutants of the 2C TCR that bind QL9-L(d) as a strong agonist were generated previously by site-directed mutagenesis of complementarity determining regions (CDRs) 1beta, 2alpha, 3alpha, or 3beta. We performed isothermal titration calorimetry to assess whether they use similar thermodynamic mechanisms to achieve high affinity for QL9-L(d). Four of the five TCRs examined bound to QL9-L(d) in an enthalpically driven, entropically unfavorable manner. In contrast, the high-affinity CDR1beta mutant resembled the wild-type 2C TCR interaction, with favorable entropy. To assess fine specificity, we measured the binding and kinetics of these mutants for both QL9-L(d) and a single amino acid peptide variant of QL9, called QL9-Y5-L(d). While 2C and most of the mutants had equal or higher affinity for the Y5 variant than for QL9, mutant CDR1beta exhibited 8-fold lower affinity for Y5 compared to QL9. To examine possible structural correlates of the thermodynamic and fine specificity signatures of the TCRs, the structure of unliganded QL9-L(d) was solved and compared to structures of the 2C TCR/QL9-L(d) complex and three high-affinity TCR/QL9-L(d) complexes. Our findings show that the QL9-L(d) complex does not undergo major conformational changes upon binding. Thus, subtle changes in individual CDRs account for the diverse thermodynamic and kinetic binding mechanisms and for the different peptide fine specificities.     

Distinct CDR3 conformations in TCRs determine the level of cross-reactivity for diverse antigens, but not the docking orientation

T cells are known to cross-react with diverse peptide MHC Ags through their alphabeta TCR. To explore the basis of such cross-reactivity, we examined the 2C TCR that recognizes two structurally distinct ligands, SIY-K(b) and alloantigen QL9-L(d). In this study we characterized the cross-reactivity of several high-affinity 2C TCR variants that contained mutations only in the CDR3alpha loop. Two of the TCR lost their ability to cross-react with the reciprocal ligand (SIY-K(b)), whereas another TCR (m67) maintained reactivity with both ligands. Crystal structures of four of the TCRs in complex with QL9-L(d) showed that CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3beta conformations and docking orientations were remarkably similar. Although the CDR3alpha loop of TCR m67 conferred a 2000-fold higher affinity for SIY-K(b), the TCR maintained the same docking angle on QL9-L(d) as the 2C TCR. Thus, CDR3alpha dictated the affinity and level of cross-reactivity, yet it did so without affecting the conserved docking orientation.     

Structure, specificity and CDR mobility of a class II restricted single-chain T-cell receptor.

Using NMR spectroscopy, we determined the solution structure of a single-chain T-cell receptor (scTCR) derived from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted D10 TCR. The conformations of complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) 3beta and 1alpha and surface properties of 2alpha are different from those of related class I-restricted TCRs. We infer a conserved orientation for TCR V(alpha) domains in complexes with both class I and II MHC-peptide ligands, which implies that small structural variations in V(alpha) confer MHC class preference. High mobility of CDR3 residues relative to other CDR or framework residues (picosecond time scale) provides insight into immune recognition and selection mechanisms.     

Functional evidence that conserved TCR CDR alpha 3 loop docking governs the cross-recognition of closely related peptide:class I complexes.

The TCR recognizes its peptide:MHC (pMHC) ligand by assuming a diagonal orientation relative to the MHC helices, but it is unclear whether and to what degree individual TCRs exhibit docking variations when contacting similar pMHC complexes. We analyzed monospecific and cross-reactive recognition by diverse TCRs of an immunodominant HVH-1 glycoprotein B epitope (HSV-8p) bound to two closely related MHC class I molecules, H-2K(b) and H-2K(bm8). Previous studies indicated that the pMHC portion likely to vary in conformation between the two complexes resided at the N-terminal part of the complex, adjacent to peptide residues 2-4 and the neighboring MHC side chains. We found that CTL clones sharing TCR beta-chains exhibited disparate recognition patterns, whereas those with drastically different TCRbeta-chains but sharing identical TCRalpha CDR3 loops displayed identical functional specificity. This suggested that the CDRalpha3 loop determines the TCR specificity in our model, the conclusion supported by modeling of the TCR over the actual HSV-8:K(b) crystal structure. Importantly, these results indicate a remarkable conservation in CDRalpha3 positioning, and, therefore, in docking of diverse TCRalphabeta heterodimers onto variant peptide:class I complexes, implying a high degree of determinism in thymic selection and T cell activation.     

The study of high-affinity TCRs reveals duality in T cell recognition of antigen: specificity and degeneracy

TCRs exhibit a high degree of Ag specificity, even though their affinity for the peptide/MHC ligand is in the micromolar range. To explore how Ag specificity is achieved, we studied murine T cells expressing high-affinity TCRs engineered by in vitro evolution for binding to hemoglobin peptide/class II complex (Hb/I-Ek). These TCRs were shown previously to maintain Ag specificity, despite having up to 800-fold higher affinity. We compared the response of the high-affinity TCRs and the low-affinity 3.L2 TCR toward a comprehensive set of peptides containing single substitutions at each TCR contact residue. This specificity analysis revealed that the increase in affinity resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of stimulatory peptides. The apparent discrepancy between observed degeneracy in the recognition of single amino acid-substituted Hb peptides and overall Ag specificity of the high-affinity TCRs was examined by generating chimeric peptides between the stimulatory Hb and nonstimulatory moth cytochrome c peptides. These experiments showed that MHC anchor residues significantly affected TCR recognition of peptide. The high-affinity TCRs allowed us to estimate the affinity, in the millimolar range, of immunologically relevant interactions of the TCR with peptide/MHC ligands that were previously unmeasurable because of their weak nature. Thus, through the study of high-affinity TCRs, we demonstrated that a TCR is more tolerant of single TCR contact residue substitutions than other peptide changes, revealing that recognition of Ag by T cells can exhibit both specificity and degeneracy.     

T-cell Receptor (TCR)-Peptide Specificity Overrides Affinity-enhancing TCR-Major Histocompatibility Complex Interactions

αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) engage antigens using complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops that are either germ line-encoded (CDR1 and CDR2) or somatically rearranged (CDR3). TCR ligands compose a presentation platform (major histocompatibility complex (MHC)) and a variable antigenic component consisting of a short “foreign” peptide. The sequence of events when the TCR engages its peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligand remains unclear. Some studies suggest that the germ line elements of the TCR engage the MHC prior to peptide scanning, but this order of binding is difficult to reconcile with some TCR-pMHC structures. Here, we used TCRs that exhibited enhanced pMHC binding as a result of mutations in either CDR2 and/or CDR3 loops, that bound to the MHC or peptide, respectively, to dissect the roles of these loops in stabilizing TCR-pMHC interactions. Our data show that TCR-peptide interactions play a strongly dominant energetic role providing a binding mode that is both temporally and energetically complementary with a system requiring positive selection by self-pMHC in the thymus and rapid recognition of non-self-pMHC in the periphery.     

Immunobiological analysis of TCR single-chain transgenic mice reveals new possibilities for interaction between CDR3alpha and an antigenic peptide bound to MHC class I

The interaction between TCRs and peptides presented by MHC molecules determines the specificity of the T cell-mediated immune response. To elucidate the biologically important structural features of this interaction, we generated TCR beta-chain transgenic mice using a TCR derived from a T cell clone specific for the immunodominant peptide of vesicular stomatitis virus (RGYVYQGL, VSV8) presented by H-2K(b). We immunized these mice with VSV8 or analogs substituted at TCR contact residues (positions 1, 4, and 6) and analyzed the CDR3alpha sequences of the elicited T cells. In VSV8-specific CTLs, we observed a highly conserved residue at position 93 of CDR3alpha and preferred Jalpha usage, indicating that multiple residues of CDR3alpha are critical for recognition of the peptide. Certain substitutions at peptide position 4 induced changes at position 93 and in Jalpha usage, suggesting a potential interaction between CDR3alpha and position 4. Cross-reactivity data revealed the foremost importance of the Jalpha region in determining Ag specificity. Surprisingly, substitution at position 6 of VSV8 to a negatively charged residue induced a change at position 93 of CDR3alpha to a positively charged residue, suggesting that CDR3alpha may interact with position 6 in certain circumstances. Analogous interactions between the TCR alpha-chain and residues in the C-terminal half of the peptide have not yet been revealed by the limited number of TCR/peptide-MHC crystal structures reported to date. The transgenic mouse approach allows hundreds of TCR/peptide-MHC interactions to be examined comparatively easily, thus permitting a wide-ranging analysis of the possibilities for Ag recognition in vivo.     

Differential sensitivity to mutations in a single peptide by two TCRs having identical beta-chains and closely related alpha-chains

The TCR on CD4 T cells binds to and recognizes MHC class II:antigenic peptide complexes through molecular contacts with the peptide amino acid residues that face up and out of the peptide-binding groove. This interaction primarily involves the complementarity-determining regions (CDR) of the TCR alpha- and ss-chains contacting up to five residues of the peptide. We have used two TCRs that recognize the same antigenic peptide and have identical Vss8.2 chains, but differ in all three CDR of their related Valpha2 chains, to examine the fine specificity of the TCR:peptide contacts that lead to activation. By generating a peptide library containing all 20 aa residues in the five potential TCR contact sites, we were able to demonstrate that the two similar TCRs responded differentially when agonist, nonagonist, and antagonist peptide functions were examined. Dual substituted peptides containing an agonist residue at the N terminus, which interacts with CDR2alpha, and an antagonist residue at the C terminus, which interacts with the CDR3ss, were used to show that the nature of the overall signal through the TCR is determined by a combination of the type of signal received through both the TCR alpha- and ss-chains.     

Fine specificity of TCR complementarity-determining region residues and lipid antigen hydrophilic moieties in the recognition of a CD1-lipid complex

alphabeta TCR can recognize peptides presented by MHC molecules or lipids and glycolipids presented by CD1 proteins. Whereas the structural basis for peptide/MHC recognition is now clearly understood, it is not known how the TCR can interact with such disparate molecules as lipids. Recently, we demonstrated that the alphabeta TCR confers specificity for both the lipid Ag and CD1 isoform restriction, indicating that the TCR is likely to recognize a lipid/CD1 complex. We hypothesized that lipids may bind to CD1 via their hydrophobic alkyl and acyl chains, exposing the hydrophilic sugar, phosphate, and other polar functions for interaction with the TCR complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). To test this model, we mutated the residues in the CDR3 region of the DN1 TCR beta-chain that were predicted to project between the CD1b alpha helices in a model of the TCR/CD1 complex. In addition, we tested the requirement for the negatively charged and polar functions of mycolic acid for Ag recognition. Our findings indicate that the CDR loops of the TCR form the Ag recognition domain of CD1-restricted TCRs and suggest that the hydrophilic domains of a lipid Ag can form a combinatorial epitope recognized by the TCR.     

Plasticity in the Contribution of T Cell Receptor Variable Region Residues to Binding of Peptide–HLA-A2 Complexes

One hypothesis accounting for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction by T cell receptors (TCRs) holds that there are several evolutionary conserved residues in TCR variable regions that contact MHC. While this “germline codon” hypothesis is supported by various lines of evidence, it has been difficult to test. The difficulty stems in part from the fact that TCRs exhibit low affinities for pep/MHC, thus limiting the range of binding energies that can be assigned to these key interactions using mutational analyses. To measure the magnitude of binding energies involved, here we used high-affinity TCRs engineered by mutagenesis of CDR3. The TCRs included a high-affinity, MART-1/HLA-A2-specific single-chain TCR and two other high-affinity TCRs that all contain the same Vα region and recognize the same MHC allele (HLA-A2), with different peptides and Vβ regions. Mutational analysis of residues in CDR1 and CDR2 of the three Vα2 regions showed the importance of the key germline codon residue Y51. However, two other proposed key residues showed significant differences among the TCRs in their relative contributions to binding. With the use of single-position, yeast-display libraries in two of the key residues, MART-1/HLA-A2 selections also revealed strong preferences for wild-type germline codon residues, but several alternative residues could also accommodate binding and, hence, MHC restriction. Thus, although a single residue (Y51) could account for a proportion of the energy associated with positive selection (i.e., MHC restriction), there is significant plasticity in requirements for particular side chains in CDR1 and CDR2 and in their relative binding contributions among different TCRs.     

Crystal structure of a T cell receptor Valpha11 (AV11S5) domain: new canonical forms for the first and second complementarity determining regions.

We describe the X-ray crystallographic structure of a murine T cell receptor (TCR) Valpha domain ("Valpha85.33"; AV11S5-AJ17) to 1.85 A resolution. The Valpha85.33 domain is derived from a TCR that recognizes a type II collagen peptide associated with the murine major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecule, I-A(q). Valpha85.33 packs as a Valpha-Valpha homodimer with a highly symmetric monomer-monomer interface. The first and second complementarity determining regions (CDR1 and CDR2) of this Valpha are shorter than the CDRs corresponding to the majority of other Valpha gene families, and three-dimensional structures of CDRs of these lengths have not been described previously. The CDR1 and CDR2 therefore represent new canonical forms that could serve as templates for AV11 family members. CDR3 of the Valpha85.33 domain is highly flexible and this is consistent with plasticity of this region of the TCR. The fourth hypervariable loop (HV4alpha) of AV11 and AV10 family members is one residue longer than that of other HV4alpha regions and shows a high degree of flexibility. The increase in length results in a distinct disposition of the conserved residue Lys68, which has been shown in other studies to play a role in antigen recognition. The X-ray structure of Valpha85.33 extends the database of canonical forms for CDR1 and CDR2, and has implications for antigen recognition by TCRs that contain related Valpha domains.     

An MHC interaction site maps to the amino-terminal half of the T cell receptor alpha chain variable domain.

We have used cloned T cell receptor (TCR) genes from closely related CD4 T cell lines to probe the interaction of the TCR with several specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II ligands. Complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) equivalents of both alpha and beta TCR chains are required for antigen-MHC recognition. Our data provide novel information about the rotational orientation of TCR-MHC contacts in that exchange of the amino terminal portion of the TCR alpha chain containing the putative CDR1 and CDR2 regions results in both gain and loss of MHC class II specificity by the resulting receptor. These two TCRs differ primarily in recognition of polymorphisms in the second hypervariable region of the MHC class II alpha chain. These results document the involvement of CDR1 and/or CDR2 of the TCR alpha chain in MHC recognition and suggest a rotational orientation of this TCR to its MHC ligand.     

The versatility of the αβ T‐cell antigen receptor

The T‐cell antigen receptor is a heterodimeric αβ protein (TCR) expressed on the surface of T‐lymphocytes, with each chain of the TCR comprising three complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) that collectively form the antigen‐binding site. Unlike antibodies, which are closely related proteins that recognize intact protein antigens, TCRs classically bind, via their CDR loops, to peptides (p) that are presented by molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This TCR‐pMHC interaction is crucially important in cell‐mediated immunity, with the specificity in the cellular immune response being attributable to MHC polymorphism, an extensive TCR repertoire and a variable peptide cargo. The ensuing structural and biophysical studies within the TCR‐pMHC axis have been highly informative in understanding the fundamental events that underpin protective immunity and dysfunctional T‐cell responses that occur during autoimmunity. In addition, TCRs can recognize the CD1 family, a family of MHC‐related molecules that instead of presenting peptides are ideally suited to bind lipid‐based antigens. Structural studies within the CD1‐lipid antigen system are beginning to inform us how lipid antigens are specifically presented by CD1, and how such CD1‐lipid antigen complexes are recognized by the TCR. Moreover, it has recently been shown that certain TCRs can bind to vitamin B based metabolites that are bound to an MHC‐like molecule termed MR1. Thus, TCRs can recognize peptides, lipids, and small molecule metabolites, and here we review the basic principles underpinning this versatile and fascinating receptor recognition system that is vital to a host's survival.     

Single and dual amino acid substitutions in TCR CDRs can enhance antigen-specific T cell functions

Single and dual amino acid substitution variants were generated in the TCR CDRs of three TCRs that recognize tumor-associated Ags. Substitutions that enhance the reactivity of TCR gene-modified T cells to the cognate Ag complex were identified using a rapid RNA-based transfection system. The screening of a panel of variants of the 1G4 TCR, that recognizes a peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 157-165 of the human cancer testis Ag NY-ESO-1 (SLLMWITQC) in the context of the HLA-A*02 class I allele, resulted in the identification of single and dual CDR3alpha and CDR2beta amino acid substitutions that dramatically enhanced the specific recognition of NY-ESO-1(+)/HLA-A*02(+) tumor cell lines by TCR gene-modified CD4(+) T cells. Within this group of improved TCRs, a dual substitution in the 1G4 TCR CDR3alpha chain was identified that enhanced Ag-specific reactivity in gene-modified CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Separate experiments on two distinct TCRs that recognize the MART-1 27-35 (AAGIGILTV) peptide/HLA-A*02 Ag complex characterized single amino acid substitutions in both TCRs that enhanced CD4(+) T cell Ag-specific reactivity. These results indicate that simple TCR substitution variants that enhance T cell function can be identified by rapid transfection and assay techniques, providing the means for generating potent Ag complex-specific TCR genes for use in the study of T cell interactions and in T cell adoptive immunotherapy.     

Single MHC mutation eliminates enthalpy associated with T cell receptor binding

The keystone of the adaptive immune response is T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. The crystal structure of AHIII TCR bound to MHC, HLA-A2, showed a large interface with an atypical binding orientation. MHC mutations in the interface of the proteins were tested for changes in TCR recognition. From the range of responses observed, three representative HLA-A2 mutants, T163A, W167A, and K66A, were selected for further study. Binding constants and co-crystal structures of the AHIII TCR and the three mutants were determined. K66 in HLA-A2 makes contacts with both peptide and TCR, and has been identified as a critical residue for recognition by numerous TCR. The K66A mutation resulted in the lowest AHIII T cell response and the lowest binding affinity, which suggests that the T cell response may correlate with affinity. Importantly, the K66A mutation does not affect the conformation of the peptide. The change in affinity appears to be due to a loss in hydrogen bonds in the interface as a result of a conformational change in the TCR complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) loop. Isothermal titration calorimetry confirmed the loss of hydrogen bonding by a large loss in enthalpy. Our findings are inconsistent with the notion that the CDR1 and CDR2 loops of the TCR are responsible for MHC restriction, while the CDR3 loops interact solely with the peptide. Instead, we present here an MHC mutation that does not change the conformation of the peptide, yet results in an altered conformation of a CDR3.     

T cell receptor binding transition states and recognition of peptide/MHC

T cell receptor recognition of peptide/MHC has been described as proceeding through a "two-step" process in which the TCR first contacts the MHC molecule prior to formation of the binding transition state using the germline-encoded CDR1 and CDR2 loops. The receptor then contacts the peptide using the hypervariable CDR3 loops as the transition state decays to the bound state. The model subdivides TCR binding into peptide-independent and peptide-dependent steps, demarcated at the binding transition state. Investigating the two-step model, here we show that two TCRs that recognize the same peptide/MHC bury very similar amounts of solvent-accessible surface area in their transition states. However, 1300-1500 A2 of surface area is buried in each, a significant amount suggestive of participation of peptide and associated CDR3 surface. Consistent with this interpretation, analysis of peptide and TCR variants indicates that stabilizing contacts to the peptide are formed within both transition states. These data are incompatible with the original two-step model, as are transition state models built using the principle of minimal frustration commonly employed in the investigation of protein folding and binding transition states. These findings will be useful in further explorations of the nature of TCR binding transition states, as well as ongoing efforts to understand the mechanisms by which T cell receptors recognize the composite peptide/MHC surface.     

Systematic mutagenesis of TCR complementarity-determining region 3 residues: a single conservative substitution dramatically improves response to both multiple HLA-DR alleles and peptide variants.

To define the relative contributions of HLA and peptide contacts with TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) 3 residues in T cell recognition, systematic mutagenesis and domain swapping was conducted on two highly similar TCRs that both respond to the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) peptide, HA307-319, but with different HLA restrictions. Despite the primary sequence similarity of these TCRs, exchange of as little as two CDR3 residues between them completely abrogated responsiveness. At position 95 within CDR3alpha, various substitutions still allowed for some degree of recognition. One modest substitution, alanine for glycine (essentially the addition of a methyl group), significantly broadened the specificity of the TCR. Transfectants expressing this mutant TCR responded strongly in the context of multiple HLA-DR alleles and to HA peptide variants with substitutions at each TCR contact residue. These results suggest that the conformations of CDR3 loops are crucial to TCR specificity and that it may not be reliable to extrapolate from primary sequence similarities in TCRs to similarities in specificity. The ease with which a broad specificity is induced in this mutant TCR has implications for the mechanisms and frequency of alloreactivity and promiscuity in T cell responses.     

A new twist in TCR diversity revealed by a forbidden alphabeta TCR

We report crystal structures of a negatively selected T cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes two I-A^u-restricted myelin basic protein peptides and one of its peptide/major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligands. Unusual complementarity-determining region (CDR) structural features revealed by our analyses identify a previously unrecognized mechanism by which the highly variable CDR3 regions define ligand specificity. In addition to the pMHC contact residues contributed by CDR3, the CDR3 residues buried deep within the Vα/Vβ interface exert indirect effects on recognition by influencing the Vα/Vβ interdomain angle. This phenomenon represents an additional mechanism for increasing the potential diversity of the TCR repertoire. Both the direct and indirect effects exerted by CDR residues can impact global TCR/MHC docking. Analysis of the available TCR structures in light of these results highlights the significance of the Vα/Vβ interdomain angle in determining specificity and indicates that TCR/pMHC interface features do not distinguish autoimmune from non-autoimmune class II-restricted TCRs.