ROC graphs for assessing the ability of a diagnostic marker to detect three disease classes with an umbrella ordering

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under these curves are commonly used to assess the ability of a continuous diagnostic marker (e.g., DNA methylation markers) to correctly classify subjects as having a particular disease or not (e.g., cancer). These approaches, however, are not applicable to settings where the gold standard yields more than two disease states or classes. ROC surfaces and the volume under the surfaces have been proposed for settings with more than two disease classes. These approaches, however, do not allow one to assess the ability of a marker to differentiate two disease classes from a third disease class without requiring a monotone order for the three disease classes under study. That is, existing approaches do not accommodate an umbrella ordering of disease classes. This article proposes the construction of an ROC graph that is applicable for an umbrella ordering. Furthermore, this article proposes that a summary measure for this umbrella ROC graph can be used to summarize the classification accuracy, and corresponding variance estimates can be obtained using U-statistics theory or bootstrap methods. The proposed methods are illustrated using data from a study assessing the ability of a DNA methylation marker to correctly classify lung specimens into three histologic classes: squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and nontumor lung.     

A Model for Adjusting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Estimation of the ROC Curve and Its Area with Likelihood‐Based Approach

Summary In estimation of the ROC curve, when the true disease status is subject to nonignorable missingness, the observed likelihood involves the missing mechanism given by a selection model. In this article, we proposed a likelihood‐based approach to estimate the ROC curve and the area under the ROC curve when the verification bias is nonignorable. We specified a parametric disease model in order to make the nonignorable selection model identifiable. With the estimated verification and disease probabilities, we constructed four types of empirical estimates of the ROC curve and its area based on imputation and reweighting methods. In practice, a reasonably large sample size is required to estimate the nonignorable selection model in our settings. Simulation studies showed that all four estimators of ROC area performed well, and imputation estimators were generally more efficient than the other estimators proposed. We applied the proposed method to a data set from research in Alzheimer's disease.     

Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias

Covariate-specific receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are often used to evaluate the classification accuracy of a medical diagnostic test or a biomarker, when the accuracy of the test is associated with certain covariates. In many large-scale screening tests, the gold standard is subject to missingness due to high cost or harmfulness to the patient. In this article, we propose a semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curves with a partial missing gold standard. A location-scale model is constructed for the test result to model the covariates' effect, but the residual distributions are left unspecified. Thus the baseline and link functions of the ROC curve both have flexible shapes. With the gold standard missing at random (MAR) assumption, we consider weighted estimating equations for the location-scale parameters, and weighted kernel estimating equations for the residual distributions. Three ROC curve estimators are proposed and compared, namely, imputation-based, inverse probability weighted, and doubly robust estimators. We derive the asymptotic normality of the estimated ROC curve, as well as the analytical form of the standard error estimator. The proposed method is motivated and applied to the data in an Alzheimer's disease research.     

Robust Estimation of Area Under ROC Curve Using Auxiliary Variables in the Presence of Missing Biomarker Values

Summary In medical research, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves can be used to evaluate the performance of biomarkers for diagnosing diseases or predicting the risk of developing a disease in the future. The area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC), as a summary measure of ROC curves, is widely utilized, especially when comparing multiple ROC curves. In observational studies, the estimation of the AUC is often complicated by the presence of missing biomarker values, which means that the existing estimators of the AUC are potentially biased. In this article, we develop robust statistical methods for estimating the ROC AUC and the proposed methods use information from auxiliary variables that are potentially predictive of the missingness of the biomarkers or the missing biomarker values. We are particularly interested in auxiliary variables that are predictive of the missing biomarker values. In the case of missing at random (MAR), that is, missingness of biomarker values only depends on the observed data, our estimators have the attractive feature of being consistent if one correctly specifies, conditional on auxiliary variables and disease status, either the model for the probabilities of being missing or the model for the biomarker values. In the case of missing not at random (MNAR), that is, missingness may depend on the unobserved biomarker values, we propose a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of MNAR on the estimation of the ROC AUC. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators are studied and their finite‐sample behaviors are evaluated in simulation studies. The methods are further illustrated using data from a study of maternal depression during pregnancy.     

Review and comparison of ROC curve estimators for a time‐dependent outcome with marker‐dependent censoring

To quantify the ability of a marker to predict the onset of a clinical outcome in the future, time‐dependent estimators of sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve have been proposed accounting for censoring of the outcome. In this paper, we review these estimators, recall their assumptions about the censoring mechanism and highlight their relationships and properties. A simulation study shows that marker‐dependent censoring can lead to important biases for the ROC estimators not adapted to this case. A slight modification of the inverse probability of censoring weighting estimators proposed by Uno et al. (2007) and Hung and Chiang (2010a) performs as well as the nearest neighbor estimator of Heagerty et al. (2000) in the simulation study and has interesting practical properties. Finally, the estimators were used to evaluate abilities of a marker combining age and a cognitive test to predict dementia in the elderly. Data were obtained from the French PAQUID cohort. The censoring appears clearly marker‐dependent leading to appreciable differences between ROC curves estimated with the different methods.     

Assessing the predictive power of newly added biomarkers

As medical research and technology advance, there are always new biomarkers found and predictive models proposed for improving the diagnostic performance of diseases. Therefore, in addition to the existing biomarkers and predictive models, how to assess new biomarkers becomes an important research problem. Many classification performance measures, which are usually based on the performance on the whole cut‐off values, were applied directly to this type of problems. However, in a medical diagnosis, some cut‐off points are more important, such as those points within the range of high specificity. Thus, as the partial area under the ROC curve to the area under ROC curve, we study the partial integrated discriminant improvement (pIDI) for evaluating the predictive ability of a newly added marker at a prespecified range of cut‐offs. Theoretical property of estimate of the proposed measure is reported. The performance of this new measure is then compared with that of the partial area under an ROC curve. The numerical results use synthesized are presented, and a liver cancer dataset is used for demonstration purposes.     

Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index

Summary .  Free-response assessment of diagnostic systems continues to gain acceptance in areas related to the detection, localization, and classification of one or more "abnormalities" within a subject. A free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve is a tool for characterizing the performance of a free-response system at all decision thresholds simultaneously. Although the importance of a single index summarizing the entire curve over all decision thresholds is well recognized in ROC analysis (e.g., area under the ROC curve), currently there is no widely accepted summary of a system being evaluated under the FROC paradigm. In this article, we propose a new index of the free-response performance at all decision thresholds simultaneously, and develop a nonparametric method for its analysis. Algebraically, the proposed summary index is the area under the empirical FROC curve penalized for the number of erroneous marks, rewarded for the fraction of detected abnormalities, and adjusted for the effect of the target size (or "acceptance radius"). Geometrically, the proposed index can be interpreted as a measure of average performance superiority over an artificial "guessing" free-response process and it represents an analogy to the area between the ROC curve and the "guessing" or diagonal line. We derive the ideal bootstrap estimator of the variance, which can be used for a resampling-free construction of asymptotic bootstrap confidence intervals and for sample size estimation using standard expressions. The proposed procedure is free from any parametric assumptions and does not require an assumption of independence of observations within a subject. We provide an example with a dataset sampled from a diagnostic imaging study and conduct simulations that demonstrate the appropriateness of the developed procedure for the considered sample sizes and ranges of parameters.     

Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for ROC curve in the presence of missing biomarker values

This paper considers statistical inference for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the presence of missing biomarker values by utilizing estimating equations (EEs) together with smoothed empirical likelihood (SEL). Three approaches are developed to estimate ROC curve and construct its SEL-based confidence intervals based on the kernel-assisted EE imputation, multiple imputation, and hybrid imputation combining the inverse probability weighted imputation and multiple imputation. Under some regularity conditions, we show asymptotic properties of the proposed maximum SEL estimators for ROC curve. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed SEL approaches. An example is illustrated by the proposed methodologies. Empirical results show that the hybrid imputation method behaves better than the kernel-assisted and multiple imputation methods, and the proposed three SEL methods outperform existing nonparametric method.     

ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a tool commonly used to evaluate biomarker utility in clinical diagnosis of disease. Often, multiple biomarkers are developed to evaluate the discrimination for the same outcome. Levels of multiple biomarkers can be combined via best linear combination (BLC) such that their overall discriminatory ability is greater than any of them individually. Biomarker measurements frequently have undetectable levels below a detection limit sometimes denoted as limit of detection (LOD). Ignoring observations below the LOD or substituting some replacement value as a method of correction has been shown to lead to negatively biased estimates of the area under the ROC curve for some distributions of single biomarkers. In this paper, we develop asymptotically unbiased estimators, via the maximum likelihood technique, of the area under the ROC curve of BLC of two bivariate normally distributed biomarkers affected by LODs. We also propose confidence intervals for this area under curve. Point and confidence interval estimates are scrutinized by simulation study, recording bias and root mean square error and coverage probability, respectively. An example using polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) levels to classify women with and without endometriosis illustrates the potential benefits of our methods.     

Combining multiple markers for classification using ROC

In biomedical studies, it is of great interest to develop methodologies for combining multiple markers for the purpose of disease classification. The receiving operating characteristic (ROC) technique has been widely used, where classification performance can be measured with the area under the ROC curve (AUC). In this article, we study a ROC-based method for effectively combining multiple markers for disease classification. We propose a sigmoid AUC (SAUC) estimator that maximizes the sigmoid approximation of the empirical AUC. The SAUC estimator is computationally affordable, n(1/2)-consistent and achieves the same asymptotic efficiency as the AUC estimator. Inference based on the weighted bootstrap is investigated. We also propose Monte Carlo methods to assess the overall prediction performance and the relative importance of individual markers. Finite sample performance is evaluated using simulation studies and two public data sets.     

Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy

When multiple diagnostic tests are performed on an individual or multiple disease markers are available it may be possible to combine the information to diagnose disease. We consider how to choose linear combinations of markers in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. The accuracy index to be maximized is the area or partial area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We propose a distribution-free rank-based approach for optimizing the area under the ROC curve and compare it with logistic regression and with classic linear discriminant analysis (LDA). It has been shown that the latter method optimizes the area under the ROC curve when test results have a multivariate normal distribution for diseased and non-diseased populations. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed non-parametric method is efficient when data are multivariate normal.The distribution-free method is generalized to a smooth distribution-free approach to: (i) accommodate some reasonable smoothness assumptions; (ii) incorporate covariate effects; and (iii) yield optimized partial areas under the ROC curve. This latter feature is particularly important since it allows one to focus on a region of the ROC curve which is of most relevance to clinical practice. Neither logistic regression nor LDA necessarily maximize partial areas. The approaches are illustrated on two cancer datasets, one involving serum antigen markers for pancreatic cancer and the other involving longitudinal prostate specific antigen data.     

Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers

The rapid advancement in molecule technology has led to the discovery of many markers that have potential applications in disease diagnosis and prognosis. In a prospective cohort study, information on a panel of biomarkers as well as the disease status for a patient are routinely collected over time. Such information is useful to predict patients' prognosis and select patients for targeted therapy. In this article, we develop procedures for constructing a composite test with optimal discrimination power when there are multiple markers available to assist in prediction and characterize the accuracy of the resulting test by extending the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methodology. We employ a modified logistic regression model to derive optimal linear composite scores such that their corresponding ROC curves are maximized at every false positive rate. We provide theoretical justification for using such a model for prognostic accuracy. The proposed method allows for time-varying marker effects and accommodates censored failure time outcome. When the effects of markers are approximately constant over time, we propose a more efficient estimating procedure under such models. We conduct numerical studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed procedures. Our results indicate the proposed methods are both flexible and efficient. We contrast these methods with an application concerning the prognostic accuracies of expression levels of six genes.     

Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard

In the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of tests, a gold standard on the disease status is required. However, in many complex diseases, it is impossible or unethical to obtain such a gold standard. If an imperfect standard is used, the estimated accuracy of the tests would be biased. This type of bias is called imperfect gold standard bias. In this article we develop a nonparametric maximum likelihood method for estimating ROC curves and their areas of ordinal-scale tests in the absence of a gold standard. Our simulation study shows that the proposed estimators for the ROC curve areas have good finite-sample properties in terms of bias and mean squared error. Further simulation studies show that our nonparametric approach is comparable to the binormal parametric method, and is easier to implement. Finally, we illustrate the application of the proposed method in a real clinical study on assessing the accuracy of seven specific pathologists in detecting carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.     

Minimum‐Norm Estimation for Binormal Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is often used to assess the usefulness of a diagnostic test. We present a new method to estimate the parameters of a popular semi‐parametric ROC model, called the binormal model. Our method is based on minimization of the functional distance between two estimators of an unknown transformation postulated by the model, and has a simple, closed‐form solution. We study the asymptotics of our estimators, show via simulation that they compare favorably with existing estimators, and illustrate how covariates may be incorporated into the norm minimization framework.     

On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests

Evaluation of diagnostic performance is typically based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) as its summary index. The partial area under the curve (pAUC) is an alternative index focusing on the range of practical/clinical relevance. One of the problems preventing more frequent use of the pAUC is the perceived loss of efficiency in cases of noncrossing ROC curves. In this paper, we investigated statistical properties of comparisons of two correlated pAUCs. We demonstrated that outside of the classic model there are practically reasonable ROC types for which comparisons of noncrossing concave curves would be more powerful when based on a part of the curve rather than the entire curve. We argue that this phenomenon stems in part from the exclusion of noninformative parts of the ROC curves that resemble straight‐lines. We conducted extensive simulation studies in families of binormal, straight‐line, and bigamma ROC curves. We demonstrated that comparison of pAUCs is statistically more powerful than comparison of full AUCs when ROC curves are close to a “straight line”. For less flat binormal ROC curves an increase in the integration range often leads to a disproportional increase in pAUCs’ difference, thereby contributing to an increase in statistical power. Thus, efficiency of differences in pAUCs of noncrossing ROC curves depends on the shape of the curves, and for families of ROC curves that are nearly straight‐line shaped, such as bigamma ROC curves, there are multiple practical scenarios in which comparisons of pAUCs are preferable.     

ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is commonly used to measure the accuracy of a medical test. It is a plot of the true positive fraction (sensitivity) against the false positive fraction (1-specificity) for increasingly stringent positivity criterion. Bias can occur in estimation of an ROC curve if only some of the tested patients are selected for disease verification and if analysis is restricted only to the verified cases. This bias is known as verification bias. In this paper, we address the problem of correcting for verification bias in estimation of an ROC curve when the verification process and efficacy of the diagnostic test depend on covariates. Our method applies the EM algorithm to ordinal regression models to derive ML estimates for ROC curves as a function of covariates, adjusted for covariates affecting the likelihood of being verified. Asymptotic variance estimates are obtained using the observed information matrix of the observed data. These estimates are derived under the missing-at-random assumption, which means that selection for disease verification depends only on the observed data, i.e., the test result and the observed covariates. We also address the issues of model selection and model checking. Finally, we illustrate the proposed method on data from a two-phase study of dementia disorders, where selection for verification depends on the screening test result and age.     

Identifying combinations of cancer markers for further study as triggers of early intervention

In many long-term clinical trials or cohort studies, investigators repeatedly collect and store tissue or serum specimens and later test specimens from cancer cases and a random sample of controls for potential markers for cancer. An important question is what combination, if any, of the molecular markers should be studied in a future trial as a trigger for early intervention. To answer this question, we summarized the performance of various combinations using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, which plot true versus false positive rates. To construct the ROC curves, we proposed a new class of nonparametric algorithms which extends the ROC paradigm to multiple tests. We fit various combinations of markers to a training sample and evaluated the performance in a test sample using a target region based on a utility function. We applied the methodology to the following markers for prostate cancer, the last value of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the last ratio of total to free PSA, the last slope of total PSA, and the last slope of the ratio. In the test sample, the ROC curve for last total PSA was slightly closer to the target region than the ROC curve for a combination of four markers. In a separate validation sample, the ROC curve for last total PSA intersected the target region in 77% of bootstrap replications, indicating some promise for further study. We also discussed sample size calculations.     

Least squares regression methods for clustered ROC data with discrete covariates

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a popular tool to evaluate and compare the accuracy of diagnostic tests to distinguish the diseased group from the nondiseased group when test results from tests are continuous or ordinal. A complicated data setting occurs when multiple tests are measured on abnormal and normal locations from the same subject and the measurements are clustered within the subject. Although least squares regression methods can be used for the estimation of ROC curve from correlated data, how to develop the least squares methods to estimate the ROC curve from the clustered data has not been studied. Also, the statistical properties of the least squares methods under the clustering setting are unknown. In this article, we develop the least squares ROC methods to allow the baseline and link functions to differ, and more importantly, to accommodate clustered data with discrete covariates. The methods can generate smooth ROC curves that satisfy the inherent continuous property of the true underlying curve. The least squares methods are shown to be more efficient than the existing nonparametric ROC methods under appropriate model assumptions in simulation studies. We apply the methods to a real example in the detection of glaucomatous deterioration. We also derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed methods.     

A Parametric ROC Model‐Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies

Summary The predictiveness curve shows the population distribution of risk endowed by a marker or risk prediction model. It provides a means for assessing the model's capacity for stratifying the population according to risk. Methods for making inference about the predictiveness curve have been developed using cross‐sectional or cohort data. Here we consider inference based on case–control studies, which are far more common in practice. We investigate the relationship between the ROC curve and the predictiveness curve. Insights about their relationship provide alternative ROC interpretations for the predictiveness curve and for a previously proposed summary index of it. Next the relationship motivates ROC based methods for estimating the predictiveness curve. An important advantage of these methods over previously proposed methods is that they are rank invariant. In addition they provide a way of combining information across populations that have similar ROC curves but varying prevalence of the outcome. We apply the methods to prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), a marker for predicting risk of prostate cancer.     

Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to evaluate a biomarker's ability for classifying disease status. The Youden Index (J), the maximum potential effectiveness of a biomarker, is a common summary measure of the ROC curve. In biomarker development, levels may be unquantifiable below a limit of detection (LOD) and missing from the overall dataset. Disregarding these observations may negatively bias the ROC curve and thus J. Several correction methods have been suggested for mean estimation and testing; however, little has been written about the ROC curve or its summary measures. We adapt non-parametric (empirical) and semi-parametric (ROC-GLM [generalized linear model]) methods and propose parametric methods (maximum likelihood (ML)) to estimate J and the optimal cut-point (c *) for a biomarker affected by a LOD. We develop unbiased estimators of J and c * via ML for normally and gamma distributed biomarkers. Alpha level confidence intervals are proposed using delta and bootstrap methods for the ML, semi-parametric, and non-parametric approaches respectively. Simulation studies are conducted over a range of distributional scenarios and sample sizes evaluating estimators' bias, root-mean square error, and coverage probability; the average bias was less than one percent for ML and GLM methods across scenarios and decreases with increased sample size. An example using polychlorinated biphenyl levels to classify women with and without endometriosis illustrates the potential benefits of these methods. We address the limitations and usefulness of each method in order to give researchers guidance in constructing appropriate estimates of biomarkers' true discriminating capabilities.