Late replicating X chromosomes in human triploidy.

The status of X-chromosome replication was studied in twenty-seven 69,XXY and nine 69,XXX human triploids in which the parental origin of the additional haploid set was known from the study of chromosome heteromorphisms. Among the 69,XXY triploids, fourteen had no late replicating X, two had one late replicating X in all cells examined, and eleven had two populations of cells, one with late replicating X chromosome, and one without any. Among the 69,XXX triploids, four had a single late replicating X, and five had two populations of cells, one with one late replicating X, and one with two late replicating X chromosomes. There was no correlation between the parental origin of the triploidy and the type of X-chromosome inactivation. However the number of late replicating X chromosomes was significantly lower in cultures grown from fetal tissue when compared with those grown from extra-embryonic tissue. In cultures derived from extra-embryonic tissue there was a significant correlation between the gestational age of the sample and the proportion of late replicating X chromosomes. The older the specimen, the greater the number of late replicating X chromosomes.     

Human X chromosomes: synchrony of DNA replication in diploid and triploid fibroblasts with multiple active or inactive X chromosomes

We have analyzed patterns of DNA replication in X chromosomes from diploid cultured human fibroblasts and from three triploid 69,XXY fibroblast strains, using BrdU--33258 Hoechst--Giemsa techniques. Both X chromosomes in each of these Barr body-negative triploid strains were early-replicating. The results of gene dosage studies using (1) a histochemical stain to measure X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity in single cells and (2) cellulose acetate electrophoresis of G6PD activity in cell extracts also indicated that both Xs in these strains were genetically active. When we compared the synchrony of X chromosome DNA replication kinetics both between cells and within cells containing multiple inactive Xs, a marked variability and asynchrony was observed for late-replicating X chromosomes. In a culture of 47,XXX fibroblasts administered an 8-h terminal pulse of dT after growth in BrdU-containing medium, asynchrony was detected between the two late-replicating Xs in approximately 70% of cells examined. No such asynchrony was observed between the two early-replicating Xs in similarly cultured 69,XXY cells; in the triploid strains, the two Xs were distinguished by asynchronous replication in only approximately 15% of cells. The striking variability in late X chromosome replication kinetics appears, then, to be a property unique to inactive Xs and is not inherent to all X chromosomes.     

Analysis of two 47,XXX males reveals X-Y interchange and maternal or paternal nondisjunction

Summary Two cases of 47,XXX males were studied, one of which has been published previously (Bigozzi et al. 1980). Analysis of X-linked restriction fragment length polymorphisms revealed that in this case, one X chromosome was of paternal and two were of maternal origin, whereas in the other case, two X chromosomes were of paternal and one of maternal origin. Southern blot analysis with Y-specific DNA probes demonstrated the presence of Y short arm sequences in both XXX males. In one case, the results obtained pointed to a paracentric inversion on Yp of the patient's father. In situ hybridization indicated that the Y-specific DNA sequences were localized on Xp22.3 in one of the three X chromosomes in both cases. The presence of Y DNA had no effect on random X inactivation. It is concluded that both XXX males originate from aberrant X-Y interchange during paternal meiosis, with coincident nondisjunction of the X chromosome during maternal meiosis in case 1, and during paternal meiosis II in case 2.     

The pattern of X-chromosome inactivation in the embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues of post-implantation digynic triploid LT/Sv strain mouse embryos

Spontaneously cycling LT/Sv strain female mice were mated to hemizygous Rb(X.2)2Ad males in order to facilitate the distinction of the paternal X chromosome, and the pregnant females were autopsied at about midday on the tenth day of gestation. Out of a total of 222 analysable embryos recovered, 165 (74.3%) were diploid and 57 (25.7%) were triploid. Of the triploids, 26 had an XXY and 31 an XXX sex chromosome constitution. Both embryonic and extra-embryonic tissue samples from the triploids were analysed cytogenetically by G-banding and by the Kanda technique to investigate their X-inactivation pattern. The yolk sac samples were separated enzymatically into their endodermally-derived and mesodermally-derived components, and these were similarly analysed, as were similar samples from a selection of control XmXp diploid embryos. In the case of the XmXmY digynic triploid embryos, a single darkly-staining Xm chromosome was observed in 485 (82.9%) out of 585, 304 (73.3%) out of 415, and 165 (44.7%) out of 369 metaphases from the embryonic, yolk sac mesodermally-derived and yolk sac endodermally-derived tissues, respectively. The absence of a darkly staining X-chromosome in the other metaphase spreads could either indicate that both X-chromosomes present were active, or that the Kanda technique had failed to differentially stain the inactive X-chromosome(s) present. In the case of the XmXmXp digynic triploid embryos, virtually all of the tissues analysed comprised two distinct cell lineages, namely those with two darkly-staining X-chromosomes, and those with a single darkly staining X-chromosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Parental origin of the extra chromosomes in polysomy X

Five polymorphic index markers were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to ascertain the parental origin of the extra X chromosomes in seven polysomic cases (one 49,XXXXX, three 49,XXXXY, two 48,XXXY, and one 48, XXYY). All four X chromosomes in 49, X polysomies were maternal in origin and the extra X chromosomes in 48 X polysomies were paternal. In each case the multiple X chromosomes were contributed by a single parent. Taken together with previously reported cases, these data support a single mechanism of sequential nondisjunction during either maternal or paternal gametogenesis as the cause of higher order sex chromosome polysomy.     

An XXX male resulting from paternal X-Y interchange and maternal X-X nondisjunction.

A 2-year-old boy was found to have a 47,XXX karyotype. Restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism analysis showed that, of his three X chromosomes, one is of paternal and two are of maternal origin. The results of Y-DNA hybridization were reminiscent of those in XX males in two respects. First, hybridization to Southern transfers revealed the presence in this XXX male of sequences derived from the Y-chromosomal short arm. Second, in situ hybridization showed that this Y DNA was located on the tip of the X-chromosomal short arm. We conclude that this XXX male resulted from the coincidence of X-X nondisjunction during maternal meiosis and aberrant X-Y interchange either during or prior to paternal meiosis.     

A liveborn 69,XXX triploid. Origin, X chromosome activity and gene dosage

A 69,XXX female liveborn triploid survived 45 days. The phenotype was consistent with the average clinical picture of liveborn triploids. Autopsy revealed slight atrophy of cerebral cortex and corpus callosum and severe adrenal hypoplasia. Chromosome polymorphisms indicated that the origin of this triploid was dispermy. Replication studies of the X chromosome performed on lymphocytes and fibroblasts showed that the majority of cells had two late replicating X chromosomes. X chromosome inactivation in spontaneous abortuses and liveborn triploids is discussed. Nine enzymes encoded by autosomal genes were tested, five had normal, three increased, and one reduced levels of activity. The reduced activity of alpha-galactosidase, an X-linked enzyme, is in agreement with cytogenetic findings and demonstrated a gene dosage effect.     

Coincident maternal meiotic nondisjunction of chromosomes X and 21 without evidence of autosomal aysnapsis

Summary A family in which the proband showed phenotypic signs of both the Turner and Down syndromes was studied cytogenetically and with restriction fragment length polymorphisms. The proband's karyotype was 46,X,+21, showing double aneuploidy without any signs of mosaicism. The single X and one chromosome 21 were of paternal origin while two chromosomes 21 were of maternal origin. The nondisjunction of chromosome 21 took place in maternal meiosis II. If it is assumed that the absence of mosaicism renders postzygotic mitotic loss of the X chromosome unlikely, then the X chromosome would have been lost in maternal meiosis I or II. Recombination had occurred between the nondisjoined chromosomes 21. We conclude that double nondisjunction took place in one parent and that asynapsis was not a prerequisite for the autosomal nondisjunction.     

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara. It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara. Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Survival of XO mouse fetuses: effect of parental origin of the X chromosome or uterine environment?

Using a recombinant product from the structurally abnormal Y chromosome, Y*, female mice with a single X of either maternal or paternal origin were generated. The two types of females were produced on the same genetic background and differ only in the origin of the X chromosome. Hence it has been possible to assess the effect of parental origin of the X on survival of females with a single X chromosome. A highly significant prenatal loss of females with a single X of paternal origin, but no comparable loss of females with a single X of maternal origin was observed. The reduced viability of females with a paternally derived X could be mediated by the parental origin of the X (i.e. X chromosome imprinting) or alternatively, since the mothers of females with a single paternally derived X have only a single X chromosome, the effect could be mediated by the genotype of the mother (i.e. maternal uterine effect).     

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

Abstract. In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara . It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara . Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Sex determination in sciarid flies: a model for the control of differential X-chromosome elimination

In sciarids, all zygotes start development with the 3X;2A chromosome constitution, two of the three X chromosomes being of paternal origin. The elimination of either one or two paternal X chromosomes produces the X:A signal which determines development along the female (2X;2A) or male (X0;2A) pathway, respectively. A model is proposed in which a chromosomal factor (CF) positively interacts with the X chromosome(s) causing its/their elimination. The number of X chromosomes to be eliminated is controlled by a maternal factor (MF) which regulates the amount of free CF factor interacting with the X chromosomes. Imprinting refers to the inability of maternal X chromosomes to bind CF factor. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.     

Heterogeneous X inactivation in trophoblastic cells of human full-term female placentas

In female mammalian cells, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated to compensate for gene-dose effects, which would be otherwise doubled compared with that in male cells. In somatic lineages in mice, the inactive X chromosome can be of either paternal or maternal origin, whereas the paternal X chromosome is specifically inactivated in placental tissue. In human somatic cells, X inactivation is mainly random, but both random and preferential paternal X inactivation have been reported in placental tissue. To shed more light on this issue, we used PCR to study the methylation status of the polymorphic androgen-receptor gene in full-term human female placentas. The sites investigated are specifically methylated on the inactive X chromosome. No methylation was found in microdissected stromal tissue, whether from placenta or umbilical cord. Of nine placentas for which two closely apposed samples were studied, X inactivation was preferentially maternal in three, was preferentially paternal in one, and was heterogeneous in the remaining five. Detailed investigation of two additional placentas demonstrated regions with balanced (1:1 ratio) preferentially maternal and preferentially paternal X inactivation. No differences in ratio were observed in samples microdissected to separate trophoblast and stromal tissues. We conclude that methylation of the androgen receptor in human full-term placenta is specific for trophoblastic cells and that the X chromosome can be of either paternal or maternal origin.     

An extra maternally derived X chromosome is deleterious to early mouse development

An extra copy of the X chromosome, unlike autosomes, exerts only minor effects on development in mammals including man and mice, because all X chromosomes except one are genetically inactivated. Contrary to this contention, we found that an additional maternally derived X (XM) chromosome, but probably not a paternally derived one (XP), consistently contributes to early death of 41,XXY and 41,XXX embryos in mice. Because of imprinted resistance to inactivation, two doses of XM remain active in the trophectoderm, and seem to be responsible for the failure in the development of the ectoplacental cone and extraembryonic ectoderm, and hence, from early embryonic death. Discordant observations in man indicating viability of XMXMXP and XMXMY individuals suggest that imprinting on the human X chromosome is either weak, unstable or erased before the initiation of X-inactivation in progenitors of extraembryonic membranes.     

Overall DNA methylation and chromatin structure of normal and abnormal X chromosomes

DNA methylation patterns were studied at the chromosome level in normal and abnormal X chromosomes using an anti-5-methylcytosine antibody. In man, except for the late-replicating X of female cells, the labeled chromosome structures correspond to R- and T-bands and heterochromatin. Depending on the cell type, the species, and cell culture conditions, the late-replicating X in female cells appears to be more or less undermethylated. Under normal conditions, the only structures that remain methylated on the X chromosomes correspond to pseudoautosomal regions, which harbor active genes. Thus, active genes are usually hypomethylated but are located in methylated chromatin. Structural rearrangements of the X chromosome, such as t(X;X)(pter;pter), induce a Turner syndrome-like phenotype that is inconsistent with the resulting triple-X constitution. This suggests a position effect controlling gene inactivation. The derivative chromosomes are always late replicating, and their duplicated short arms, which harbor pseudoautosomal regions, replicate later than the normal late-replicating X chromosomes. The compaction or condensation of this segment is unusual, with a halo of chromatin surrounding a hypocondensed chromosome core. The chromosome core is hypomethylated, but the surrounding chromatin is slightly labeled. Thus, unusual DNA methylation and chromatin condensation are associated with the observed position effect. This strengthens the hypothesis that DNA methylation at the chromosome level is associated with both chromatin structure and gene expression.     

A comparative study on steroid sulfatase and arylsulfatase C in fibroblast clones from 45,X/47,XXX and 69,XXY

Summary Steroid sulfatase (STS) and arylsulfatase C (ARSC) were studied in fibroblast clones from a 45,X/47,XXX mosaic and from a 69,XXY triploidy with one or two active X chromosomes. The comparison of the 47,XXX with 45,X clones showed an incomplete gene dosage effect (1.8 for STS and 2.0 for ARSC). This was not the case for the triploid clones with different X-inactivation patterns. These results confirm previous reports on the non-inactivation of the STS gene, and establish X linkage and non-inactivation for the ARSC gene as well.     

A 48,XXY,+21 Down syndrome patient with additional paternal X and maternal 21

Summary The origin of meiotic nondisjunction of the extra chromosomes X and 21 was studied in a patient with the karyotype 48,XXY,+21 using DNA polymorphisms. The extra chromosome X was the result of paternal first meiotic nondisjunction of X and Y. The extra chromosome 21 was derived from the mother. The meiotic error in the mother most probably occurred in meiosis II. Thus, this is a combination caused by the chance occurrence of two independent events.