Predictors of Severe COVID-19 in Patients With Diabetes: A Multicenter Review

ObjectiveDiabetes is an independent risk factor for severe SARS-CoV-2 infections. This study aims to elucidate the risk factors predictive of more severe outcomes in patients with diabetes by comparing the clinical characteristics of those requiring inpatient admissions with those who remain outpatient.MethodsA retrospective review identified 832 patients—631 inpatients and 201 outpatients—with diabetes and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result between March 1 and June 15, 2020. Comparisons between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts were conducted to identify risk factors associated with severity of disease determined by admission rate and mortality. Previous dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use and disease outcomes were analyzed.ResultsRisk factors for increased admission included older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; P = .003), the presence of chronic kidney disease (OR, 2.32 [1.26-4.28]; P = .007), and a higher hemoglobin A1c at the time of admission (OR, 1.25 [1.12-1.39]; P < .001). Lower admission rates were seen in those with commercial insurance. Increased mortality was seen in individuals with older age (OR, 1.09 [1.07-1.11]; P < .001), higher body mass index number (OR, 1.04 [1.01-1.07]; P = .003), and higher hemoglobin A1c value at the time of diagnosis of COVID-19 (OR, 1.12 [1.01-1.24]; P = .028) and patients requiring hospitalization. Lower mortality was seen in those with hyperlipidemia. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use prior to COVID-19 infection was not associated with a decreased hospitalization rate.ConclusionThis retrospective review offers the first analysis of outpatient predictors for admission rate and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes.     

Correlation Between Hemoglobin Glycation Index Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Complications in Type 1 Diabetes

ObjectiveHbA1C is the “gold standard” parameter to evaluate glycemic control in diabetes; however, its correlation with mean glucose is not always perfect. The objective of this study was to correlate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) with microvascular complications.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study including permanent users of CGM with type 1 diabetes mellitus or latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult. HGI was estimated, and presence of microvascular complications was compared in subgroups with high or low HGI. A logistic regression analysis to assess the contribution of high HGI to chronic kidney disease (CKD) was performed.ResultsIn total, 52 participants who were aged 39.7 ± 14.7 years, with 73.1% women and 15.5 years (IQR, 7.5-29 years) since diagnosis, were included; 32.7% recorded diabetic retinopathy, 25% CKD, and 19.2% neuropathy. The median HbA1C was 7.6% (60 mmol/mol) and glucose management indicator (GMI) 7.0% (53 mmol/mol). The average HGI was 0.55% ± 0.66%. The measured HbA1C was higher in the group with high HGI (8.1% [65 mmol/mol] vs 6.9% [52 mmol/mol]; P < .001), whereas GMI (7.0% [53 mmol/mol] vs 7.0% [53 mmol/mol]; P = .495) and mean glucose were similar in both groups (153 mg/dL vs 153 mg/dL; P = .564). In the high HGI group, higher occurrence of CKD (P = .016) and neuropathy were observed (P = .025). High HGI was associated with increased risk of CKD (odds ratio [OR]: 5.05; 95% CI: 1.02-24.8; P = .04) after adjusting for time since diagnosis (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16; P = .008).ConclusionHigh HGI measured by CGM may be a useful marker for increased risk of microvascular diabetic complications.     

Outreach Method Predicts Patient Re-engagement in Diabetes Care During Sustained Care Disruption

ObjectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, visits for diabetes care were abruptly canceled without predefined procedures to re-engage patients. This study was designed to determine how outreach influences patients to maintain diabetes care and identify factors that might impact the intervention’s efficacy.MethodsA diabetes nursing team attempted outreach for patients who had a canceled appointment for diabetes between March 16, 2020, and June 19, 2020. Outreach status was defined as reached, message left, or no contact. Outcomes were defined as follows: (1) booking and (2) keeping a follow-up appointment.ResultsSeven hundred eighty-seven patients were included (384 [49%] were reached, 152 (19%) were left a message, and 251 (32%) had no contact). Reached patients were more likely to book [odds ratio (OR) = 2.43, P < .001] and keep an appointment (OR = 2.39, P < .001) than no-contact patients. Leaving a message did not increase the odds of booking (OR = 1.05, P = .84) or keeping (OR = 1.17, P = .568) an appointment compared with no contact. Older age was a significant predictor of booking an appointment (OR = 1.014 for each year of age, P = .037). Patients on insulin were more likely to keep their appointment (OR = 1.70, P = .008). Patients with a higher hemoglobin A1C level were less likely to keep their appointment (OR = 0.87 for each 1.0% increase in the hemoglobin A1C level, P = .011).ConclusionThese findings suggest that to optimize re-engagement during care disruption, 1-way communication is no better than no contact and that 2-way communication increases the likelihood that patients will maintain access to care. In addition, although higher-risk patients (eg, patients with older age or those on insulin) may be more incentivized to stay engaged, targeted outreach is needed for those with chronically poor glycemic control.     

SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Individuals With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Compared With Controls

ObjectiveData for the association between diabetes and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) susceptibility are conflicting. We aimed to evaluate this association using an analytical cross-sectional study design.MethodsStudy participants were recruited from endocrine clinics of our hospital and belonged to 3 groups: group 1 (type 1 diabetes mellitus [T1DM]), group 2 (type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM]), and group 3 (controls). All participants submitted blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 immunoglobulin G antibody test (LIAISON; DiaSorin) and were interviewed for a history of documented infection.ResultsWe evaluated a total of 643 participants (T1DM, 149; T2DM, 160; control, 334; mean age, 37.9 ± 11.5 years). A total of 324 (50.4%) participants were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2. The seropositivity rate was significantly higher in the T1DM (55.7% vs 44.9%, P = .028) and T2DM (56.9% vs 44.9%, P = .013) groups than in the control group. The antibody levels in seropositive participants with T1DM and T2DM were not significantly different from those in seropositive controls. On multivariable analysis, low education status (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.03-1.94]; P = .035), diabetes (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.20-2.34]; P = .002), and overweight/obesity (OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.10-2.10]; P = .012) showed a significant association with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. The association between diabetes and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was found to further increase in participants with coexisting overweight/obesity (adjusted OR, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.54-4.47]; P < .001).ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 seropositivity, assessed before the onset of the national vaccination program, was significantly higher in participants with T1DM and T2DM than in controls. The antibody response did not differ between seropositive participants with and without diabetes. These findings point toward an increased SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility for patients with diabetes, in general, without any differential effect of the diabetes type.     

The Added and Interpretative Value of CGM-Derived Parameters in Type 1 Diabetes Depends on the Level of Glycemic Control

ObjectiveIn type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) management, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived parameters can provide additional insights, with time in range (TIR) and other parameters reflecting glycemic control and variability being put forward. This study aimed to examine the added and interpretative value of the CGM-derived indices TIR and coefficient of variation (CV%) in T1DM patients stratified according to their level of glycemic control by means of HbA1C.MethodsT1DM patients with a minimum disease duration of 10 years and without known macrovascular disease were enrolled. Patients were equipped with a blinded CGM device for 7 days. TIR and time spent in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were determined, and CV% was used as a parameter for glycemic variability. Pearson (r) and Spearman correlations (r_s) and a regression analysis were used to examine associations.ResultsNinety-five patients (age: 45 ± 10 years; HbA1C level: 7.7% ± 0.8% [61 ± 7 mmol/mol]) were included (mean blood glucose [MBG]: 159 ± 31 mg/dL; TIR: 55.8% ± 14.9%; CV%: 43.5% ± 7.8%) and labeled as having good (HbA1C level ≤7% [≤53 mmol/mol]; n = 20), moderate (7%-8%; n = 44), or poor (>8% [>64 mmol/mol]; n = 31) glycemic control. HbA1C was significantly associated with MBG (r_s = 0.48, P < .001) and time spent in hyperglycemia (total: r_s = 0.52; level 2: r = 0.46; P < .001) but not with time spent in hypoglycemia and CV%, even after an analysis of the HbA1C subgroups. Similarly, TIR was negatively associated with HbA1C (r = −0.53; P < .001), MBG (r_s = −0.81; P < .001), and time spent in hyperglycemia (total: r_s = −0.90; level 2: r_s = −0.84; P < .001) but not with time in hypoglycemia. The subgroup analyses, however, showed that TIR was associated with shorter time spent in level-2 hypoglycemia in patients with good (r_s = −0.60; P = .007) and moderate (r_s = −0.25; P = .047) glycemic control. In contrast, CV% was strongly positively associated with time in hypoglycemia (total: r_s = 0.78; level 2: r_s = 0.76; P < .001) but not with TIR or time in hyperglycemia in the entire cohort, although the subgroup analyses showed that TIR was negatively associated with CV% in patients with good glycemic control (r = −0.81, P < .001) and positively associated in patients with poor glycemic control (r = +0.47; P < .01).ConclusionThe CGM-derived metrics TIR and CV% are related to clinically important situations, TIR being strongly dependent on hyperglycemia and CV% being reflective of hypoglycemic risk. However, the interpretation and applicability of TIR and CV% and their relationship depends on the level of glycemic control of the individual patient, with CV% generally adding less clinically relevant information in those with poor control. This illustrates the need for further research and evaluation of composite measures of glycemic control in T1DM.     

Exenatide Twice Daily Plus Glargine Versus Aspart 70/30 Twice Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Premixed Human Insulin and Metformin

ObjectiveMany patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin gradually have inadequate glycemic control and switch to a basal-bolus regimen, which raises some concerns for weight gain and increased hypoglycemic risk. Switching to combination use of glp-1 agonist and basal insulin may be an alternative option.MethodsAfter a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.ResultsAfter 24 weeks, the patients receiving exenatide plus glargine (n = 90) had improved HbA1c control compared with those receiving aspart 70/30 (n = 90) (least squares mean change: ‒0.59 vs ‒0.13%; difference [95% CI]: ‒0.45 [‒0.74 to ‒0.17]) in the full analysis set population. Weight decreased 3.5 kg with exenatide and decreased 0.4 kg with aspart 70/30 (P < .001). The insulin dose was reduced 10.7 units/day (95% CI, ‒12.2 to ‒9.2 units; P < .001) with exenatide, and increased 9.7 units/day (95% CI, 8.2 to 11.2 units; P < .001) with aspart 70/30. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]). The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in 2 groups (27% for exenatide and 38% for aspart 70/30; P = .1).ConclusionIn premixed human insulin‒treated patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control, switching to exenatide twice a day plus glargine was superior to aspart 70/30 twice a day for glycemic and weight control.     

Feasibility,Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intensive Clinic-Based Intervention for Children With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a team-based intervention for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with suboptimal glycemia, as detected based on the measurement of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C).MethodsForty participants with T1D for >1 year and an HbA1C level of ≥9.5% (80 mmol/mol) enrolled for a multidisciplinary intervention that included pediatric endocrinologists, pediatric psychologists, and a certified diabetes care and education specialist (CDCES). The CDCES-integrated medical management, while reinforcing physical, emotional, and behavioral health, connected with families to set and monitor goals and reviewed medication adjustments. The feasibility was assessed based on enrollment targets; acceptability based on retention rates; and preliminary efficacy based on changes in HbA1C levels, quality of life, diabetes-related strengths and resilience, hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and missed school days.ResultsOf 43 patients and families approached, 40 agreed to participate, 36 completed the 4-month intervention, and 31 completed full 8 months of follow-up data collection. The CDCES coach averaged 6.8 contacts per participant during the 8-month study period. The HbA1C level reduced significantly from baseline to 4 months (12.1% ± 1.6% to 11.0% ± 1.9%, P = .001) and was sustained at 8 months (10.7% ± 1.9%, P < .001). The participants reported significant increases in diabetes-specific quality of life (P < .05) and diabetes-related strength and resilience (P = .003). The missed school days reduced from 7.23 ± 7.5 days to 1.55 ± 1.9 days (P < .001), and the diabetes-related hospitalizations decreased from 0.4 ± 0.6 to 0.1 ± 0.3 (P = .009).ConclusionPreliminary data suggest that a multidisciplinary intervention leveraging a team-based approach with a physician, psychologist, and CDCES can support improvements in glycemic control and psychosocial outcomes among youth with T1D with an HbA1C level above the target.     

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Lipohypertrophy - Impact of the Intervention on Glycemic Control via Patient’s Examination and Retraining on Change of Infusion Set

ObjectiveLipohypertrophy (LH) is a common complication of insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We examined whether an intervention consisting of LH assessment and retraining on insulin infusion set use improves glycemic control on subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with T1DM.MethodsThe intervention was conducted in 79 consecutive patients with T1DM. Data on glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin doses were collected at baseline and after a median of 22 weeks (20-31.75 weeks).ResultsA total of 46 patients with T1DM (23 [50%] women) participating in the follow-up were characterized by a median age of 29 years (25-33.8 years), body mass index of 24.6 ± 3.3 kg/m², T1DM duration of 16.5 years (8.3-20 years), and subcutaneous insulin infusion duration of 7 years (4-10.8 years). Patients’ median HbA1c fell from 7.4% (6.7%-8.2%) to 7.05% (6.4%-7.6%) (P < .001), daily insulin dose/kg decreased (0.7 ± 0.20 vs 0.68 ± 0.15 IU/kg; P = .017) together with the total daily insulin dose (50.3 [40.5-62.7] vs 47.6 [39.8-62.1] IU; P = .019]. Furthermore, the percentage of basal insulin dose increased (43.0% [36-50] vs 44.0% [39.0-50.0]; P = .010], whereas the percentage of bolus dose decreased (57% [50-64] vs 56% [50-61], P = .010).ConclusionsThe structured LH-related intervention in patients with T1DM on insulin pumps resulted in better glycemic control and a decrease in total daily insulin dose.     

COVID-19 May Increase the Risk of Insulin Resistance in Adult Patients Without Diabetes: A 6-Month Prospective Study

ObjectiveDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, exploring insulin resistance and beta-cell activity is important for understanding COVID-19‒associated new-onset diabetes. We assessed insulin sensitivity and fasting insulin secretion in patients with COVID-19 without diabetes on admission and at 3 and 6 months after discharge.MethodsThis 6-month prospective study assessed data from the records of 64 patients without diabetes diagnosed with COVID-19 at Wenzhou Central Hospital, China. Each patient was followed up at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to investigate differences in multiple measurements of the same variable at different times. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the contributor for changes in the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index.ResultsFasting C-peptide levels in patients at baseline were lower than the normal range. Compared with the baseline results, patients had significantly elevated fasting C-peptide levels (0.35 ± 0.24 vs 2.36 ± 0.98 vs 2.52 ± 1.11 μg/L; P < .001), homeostasis model assessment for beta-cell function (0.42, interquartile range [IQR] 0.36-0.62 vs 2.54, IQR 1.95-3.42 vs 2.90, IQR 2.02-4.23; P < .001), and TyG indices (8.57 ± 0.47 vs 8.73 ± 0.60 vs 8.82 ± 0.62; P = .006) and decreased fasting glucose levels (5.84 ± 1.21 vs 4.95 ± 0.76 vs 5.40 ± 0.68 mmol/L; P = .003) at the 3- and 6-month follow-up. Male gender, age, interferon-alfa treatment during hospitalization, and changes in total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein levels were significantly associated with changes in the TyG index.ConclusionOur study provided the first evidence that COVID-19 may increase the risk of insulin resistance in patients without diabetes.     

Effect of Treatment of OSA With CPAP on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Sleep Treatment Trial (DSTT)

ObjectiveThe effect of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on glycemic measures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether CPAP treatment of OSA improves glycemic measures in patients with T2D.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial (N = 98) examined changes in glycemic measures following 12 weeks of active (n = 49) or sham (n = 49) CPAP and consideried participants’ adherence to CPAP therapy (percentage of days with ≥4 hours use and average hours/day of use).ResultsBaseline treatment groups were similar. Regarding the efficacy of active vs sham-CPAP over time, at 6 weeks, both groups had similar reductions in fructosamine (mean difference [MD], 95% confidence interval [CI]: CPAP ?13.10 [?25.49 to ?0.7] vs. sham ?7.26 [?20.2 to 5.69]; P = .519) but different in HbA1c (CPAP ?0.24 [?0.48 to ?0.003] vs sham 0.15 [?0.10 to 0.4]; P = .027). At 12 weeks, reductions in HbA1c values were similar by group (CPAP ?0.26 [?0.53 to 0.002] vs sham ?0.24 [?0.53 to 0.04]; P = .924). HbA1c reductions were associated with a greater percentage of cumulative days of CPAP usage ≥4 hours per day (b [SE] = 0.006 [0.002]; P = .013) and cumulative hours of CPAP use (b [SE] = 0.08 [0.08]; P = .012). CPAP use of ≥7 hours was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c (b [SE] 0.54 [0.16]; P = .0012).ConclusionCPAP treatment of OSA did not result in sustained improved glycemic control compared to sham in the intent-to-treat analysis. CPAP adherence was associated with greater improvements in glycemic control.     

Risk Factors of Thyroid Eye Disease

ObjectiveTo examine risk factors that might be associated with thyroid eye disease (TED) in patients with Graves’ disease (GD), which may guide physicians in the prevention and management of TED.MethodsMedline and Embase were searched for articles discussing risk factors of TED. Comparisons were made between GD patients with and without TED, and between active and inactive TED GD patients. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were determined for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Results were pooled with random effects using the DerSimonian and Laird model.ResultsFifty-six articles were included in the analysis. Smoking, inclusive of current and previous smoking status, was a significant risk factor for TED (OR: 2.401; CI: 1.958-2.945; P < .001). Statistical significance was found upon meta-regression between male sex and the odds of smoking and TED (β = 1.195; SE = 0.436; P = .013). Other risk factors were also examined, and patients with TED were significantly older than those without TED (WMD: 1.350; CI: 0.328-2.372; P = .010). While both age (WMD: 5.546; CI: 3.075-8.017; P < .001) and male sex (OR: 1.819; CI: 1.178-2.808; P = .007) were found to be significant risk factors for active TED patients compared to inactive TED patients, no statistical significance was found for family history, thyroid status, cholesterol levels, or body mass index.ConclusionFactors such as smoking, sex, and age predispose GD patients to TED, and TED patients to active TED. A targeted approach in the management of GD and TED is required to reduce the modifiable risk factor of smoking.     

The Risk Factors for Developing Clustered Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Single-Center Study

ObjectiveVertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common among elderly individuals, but clustered VCFs (C-VCFs) are rare and more severe. The risk factors for C-VCFs remain unclear. Thus, we investigated the clinical characteristics of C-VCFs to identify the imminent fracture risk and improve the treatment for such patients.MethodsWe reviewed the records of patients with VCF at a single medical center between January 2011 and September 2020. Patients who had 4 or more VCFs within 1 year were categorized into the C-VCF group, and the remaining patients were paired into the control group at a ratio of 2:1. We collected demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiologic information regarding these patients. Univariate analyses, stratified analyses, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify the risk factors for C-VCFs.ResultsA total of 156 patients were enrolled, of whom 52 were patients with C-VCF. Patients with C-VCF had more severe fractures and pain, with fractures occurring at uncommon sites of the spine. The independent risk factors for C-VCFs included glucocorticoid (GC) treatment (P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 12.7), recent fracture history (P = .021; HR, 5.5), and lower trabecular bone score (TBS) (P = .044; HR, 1.6). TBS and bone mineral density had greater predictive values in patients without GC treatment (P < .001). Sex, age, and bone turnover biomarkers were not independent risk factors for C-VCFs.ConclusionC-VCFs are rare adverse consequences of severe osteoporosis, for which GC treatment, recent fracture history, and lower TBS are unique risk factors that are valuable for the early identification and prevention of C-VCFs.     

Sex-Specific Associations of Iron-Anemia Status With Hemoglobin A1C Levels Among Hispanics/Latinos Without Self-Reported Diabetes Mellitus: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the sex-specific associations of mutually exclusive iron-anemia status categories with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus.MethodsBaseline cross-sectional data (7247 women and 4904 men without self-reported diabetes mellitus) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos were analyzed. Per the American Diabetes Association’s defined criteria, based on HbA1C levels, the participants were categorized as having normoglycemia, prediabetes, or probable diabetes mellitus. The iron-anemia status categories were as follows: no anemia and no iron deficiency (reference), iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and non-iron deficiency anemia (non-IDA). Survey multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the sex-specific associations of iron-anemia status with HbA1C levels after adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors.ResultsThe age-standardized prevalence of iron-anemia status categories differed by sex. Compared with those with no anemia and no iron deficiency and normoglycemia, women with IDA had higher odds of having prediabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% CI, 1.64-2.89) and probable diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.62-7.99) based on HbA1C levels; men with non-IDA had higher odds of having probable diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.13-7.78) based on HbA1C levels. All other associations did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionAmong U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus, the age-standardized prevalence of iron deficiency, IDA, and non-IDA is high and varies by sex. Women with IDA had higher odds of having prediabetes and probable diabetes mellitus, defined based on HbA1C levels. Men with non-IDA had higher odds of having probable diabetes mellitus, defined based on HbA1C levels. Iron-anemia status should be considered while interpreting elevated HbA1C levels among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos without self-reported diabetes mellitus.     

Evaluation of Lipohypertrophy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Multiple Daily Insulin Injections or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

ObjectiveTo determine lipohypertrophy (LH) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) on multiple daily insulin injections (MDII) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to reveal the factors associated with the development and severity of LH.MethodsSixty-six patients with T1DM treated with MDII (n = 35, 53%) or CSII (n = 31, 47%) for at least 1 year were included. LH localizations were detected with palpation and ultrasonography (USG).ResultsThe LH detection rate with USG was significantly higher than that by palpation in the whole group (P < .001). The LH was detected with USG in 30 (85.7%) patients in the MDII group and 22 (71.0%) patients in the CSII group (P = .144). Advanced LH was detected in 13 (37.1%) of the patients treated with MDII and in 3 (9.7%) of the patients treated with CSII. LH was more severe in the MDII group than in the CSII group (P = .013). Diabetes duration and length of infusion set use were significantly longer and body mass index, hypoglycemia, and complication rates were higher in patients with LH than those in patients without LH (P < .05). A positive correlation was found between LH severity and HbA1C and insulin dose (P < .05, for both). MDII as insulin administration method, incorrect rotation, and a history of ketosis were found to be the most related factors with LH severity in a multiple linear regression analysis (P < .05).ConclusionUSG might be an effective approach for detecting and evaluating the severity of LH. MDII might cause more severe LH than CSII in patients with T1DM. In this study, LH was found to be associated mostly with incorrect rotation technique and a history of ketosis.     

Risk of Breast Cancer in Females With Hypothyroidism: A Nationwide,Population-Based,Cohort Study

ObjectivesThe results of studies investigating the relationship between breast cancer and hypothyroidism vary greatly from study to study. In this study, we analyzed a large and reliable, population-based database to gain a better understanding of the correlation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with hypothyroidism between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2012 (hypothyroidism cohort) from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 in Taiwan. For each woman with hypothyroidism, 1 woman without a history of breast cancer was randomly selected from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 and frequency matched (1:4) with women without hypothyroidism by age and index year of hypothyroidism. The study outcome was the diagnosis of breast cancer during a 12-year follow-up period.ResultsIn this study, 6665 women with hypothyroidism and 26 660 women without hypothyroidism were identified. The hypothyroidism cohort had a significantly higher risk of breast cancer than the nonhypothyroidism cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.69 [95% CI, 1.15-2.49]; P = .01), especially in the group aged 40 to 64 years (aHR 2.07 [95% CI, 1.32-3.23]; P = .01). Women in the hypothyroidism cohort taking levothyroxine for a duration ˃588 days showed a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer (aHR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.19-0.71]; P = .003).ConclusionWomen with hypothyroidism are at a higher risk of breast cancer than those without hypothyroidism. Levothyroxine may reduce the risk of breast cancer in a woman with hypothyroidism.     

Association of Thyroid Function During Pregnancy With the Risk of Pre-eclampsia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo estimate the association of maternal thyroid dysfunction with the risk of gestational hypertension and diabetes. Whether the association was affected by gestational age at diagnosis and thyroid autoimmunity was further explored.MethodsA cohort study of 41 647 participants was conducted. Thyroid function (ie, thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH] and free thyroxine [FT4]) was measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Thyroid antibody positivity (eg, thyroperoxidase, thyroglobulin, and TSH receptor antibody) was indicated if the values of these antibodies exceeded the upper targets of the reference range. The relationship between maternal thyroid dysfunction and the risk of pre-eclampsia (PE) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was assessed by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsIsolated hypothyroxinemia (defined as 5th ≤ TSH ≤ 95th percentile, FT4 < 5th percentile) was associated with the risk of PE (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.58). Overt hypothyroidism (TSH > 95th percentile; FT4 < 5th percentile) was related to the risk of severe PE (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.05-6.37). Being positive for TSH receptor antibody was associated with a decreased risk of GDM (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.70). A marginally significant association between overt hypothyroidism detected at the first trimester and the risk of GDM was found (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.00-2.83). The association of thyroid dysfunction with the risk of PE and GDM was stronger among pregnant women who were negative for autoantibodies.ConclusionSome types of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy were associated with the risk of PE and GDM. The associations varied by gestational age at diagnosis and by thyroid autoantibody status.     

Results of a 24-Week Trial of Technosphere Insulin Versus Insulin Aspart in Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic efficacy of Technosphere insulin (TI) versus that of insulin aspart (IA), each added to basal insulin, in type 2 diabetes.MethodsThis randomized, 24-week trial included subjects aged from 18 to 80 years who were treated with subcutaneous insulin for 3 months and had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of 7.0% to 11.5%. After receiving stabilized insulin glargine doses during a 4-week lead in, the subjects were randomized to TI or IA. The primary end point was an HbA1C change from baseline, with the differences analyzed by equivalence analyses.ResultsIn the overall cohort (N = 309; males, 23.3%), mean (SD) age was 58.5 (8.4) years, body mass index was 30.8 (4.7) kg/m², weight was 82.2 (13.6) kg, and duration of diabetes was 12.2 (7.1) years. An intention-to-treat cohort had 150 subjects randomized to TI (mean [SD] HbA1C: 8.9% [1.1%]) and 154 randomized to IA (mean [SD] HbA1C: 9.0% [1.3%]). At 24 weeks, mean (SD) HbA1C value declined to 7.9% (1.3%) and 7.7% (1.1%) in the TI and IA cohorts, respectively. A treatment difference of 0.26% was not statistically significant, but the predefined equivalency margin was not met. Subjects receiving TI lost 0.78 kg compared to baseline; subjects receiving IA gained 0.23 kg (P =.0007). The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was lower for the TI cohort, though not statistically significant.ConclusionBoth TI and IA resulted in significant and clinically meaningful HbA1C reductions. TI also resulted in significant and clinically meaningful weight reductions. These data support the use of inhaled insulin as a treatment option for individuals with type 2 diabetes.     

Ultra Rapid-Acting Inhaled Insulin Improves Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of an inhaled insulin would improve HbA1c.MethodsThis study was performed in 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants with HbA1c values ≥7.5 (58) to ≤11.5% (102 mmol/mol) on a variety of glucose-lowering regimens. Prandial Technosphere insulin (TI) was rapidly titrated based on a treatment algorithm using postprandial blood glucose to calculate premeal doses. A 2-week baseline period was followed by 12 weeks of active treatment with TI. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included glucose time in range (time in range: 70-180 mg/dL) obtained by a blinded continuous glucose monitoring during the baseline period and at the end of 12 weeks. Goals were to assess how to rapidly and safely initiate TI intensification, determine dosing requirements, and establish an effective dose range in uncontrolled T2DM.ResultsMean HbA1c decreased by −1.6% (−17 mmol/mol) from 9.0% (75 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks (P < .0001). Mean time in range increased from 42.2% to 65.7% (P < .0002). Mean prandial doses of TI were 18 or 19 units for all meals. Time below range was 1.1% baseline and 2.6% post treatment (P = .01).ConclusionTreatment with inhaled TI dosed using a simple algorithm improved glycemic control measured by both HbA1c and time in range, with low rates of hypoglycemia. These data add significantly to understanding TI in the management of T2DM patients for whom prandial insulin is a consideration.     

Association Between a Low-Carbohydrate Diet,Glycemic Control,and Quality of Life in Australian Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study

ObjectiveTo examine if there is an association between a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD), glycemic control, and quality of life (QoL) in Australian adults with type 1 diabetes.MethodsThis single-group, pre-post, mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) study was conducted in an outpatient tertiary hospital. Eligible participants were those aged ≥18 years, with type 1 diabetes for ≥1 year, and using multiple daily insulin injections. Participants followed a 12-week individualized LCD (<100 g/d). Daily glucose levels were monitored using a continuous glucose monitor. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and QoL were measured preintervention and postintervention. A post-hoc exploratory regression analysis determined whether changes in carbohydrate intake was associated with changes in HbA1c and QoL. Qualitative data collected postintervention explored participants’ perceptions relating to a LCD, glycemic control, and QoL.ResultsParticipants (n = 22) completed the 12-week LCD intervention. An LCD provided a statistically, significant improvement in HbA1c 0.83% (95% CI 0.32%-1.33%), P = .003 but did not impact QoL: estimated change 1.14 units (95% CI: ?5.34 to 7.61); P = .72. The post-hoc exploratory regression analysis showed that participants with poorer baseline glycemic control were more likely to respond to an LCD resulting in significant reductions in HbA1c. Participant perceptions relating to the study variables were mixed.ConclusionsAn LCD (<100 g/d) is a potentially effective and safe strategy to improve glycemic control without negatively effecting QoL in Australian adults with type 1 diabetes.