Ultrasound guidance improves the adequacy of our preoperative thyroid cytology but not its accuracy

AIMS: Our thyroid cytology audit results of 1990-1995 showed an unsatisfactory rate of 43.1% and prediction of neoplasia with a sensitivity of 86.8%. Increasingly, ultrasound scan (USS)-guided core sampling for cytology is proving a valuable tool instead of freehand fine needle aspiration (FNA) or following unsatisfactory freehand FNA. We present the results of freehand FNA and USS-guided core samples for cytology in two separate patient groups in our centre. METHODS: Patients who had a thyroid resection and preoperative thyroid cytology in our institution between 1996 and 2002 were included. The histological diagnoses were correlated with the preceding cytology results. RESULTS: A total of 450 FNAs were performed on 394 patients. Freehand FNAs were performed for 348 (77.3%) samples and USS-guided core for 102 (22.7%) samples; 121 (26.8%) were repeat aspirates performed on 45 patients. Using aspiration cytology (AC) grading, freehand FNA was cytologically inadequate (AC0 or AC1) in 34.8% cases whereas USS-guided core was inadequate in 17.6% cases (P = 0.001). Freehand FNA (AC3, AC4, AC5) predicted neoplasia with a sensitivity of 83.2%, specificity of 46.6%, accuracy of 63.0%, positive predictive value of 56.0% and negative predictive value of 77.1%. USS-guided core sample for cytology (AC3, AC4, AC5) predicted neoplasia with a sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity of 26.0%, accuracy of 51.9%, positive predictive value of 43.9% and negative predictive value of 86.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although USS-guided core provides more satisfactory specimens than freehand FNA, in our centre it does not provide increased accuracy.     

Fine needle aspiration of the breast. Importance of the aspirator

All 503 fine needle aspirations (FNAs) of the breast performed over a three-year period at the Medical Center Hospital of Vermont were analyzed. There were 93 aspirates diagnosed as "positive," all of which were from patients eventually shown to have cancer. However, there were 38 patients with primary carcinoma in which the FNA was not diagnosed as positive, for a diagnostic failure rate of 31.4%. In order to determine the possible effect of technique as practiced by an experienced aspirator in diminishing such diagnostic failures, we compared 190 aspirates obtained by a single individual with 193 aspirates obtained by 15 individuals in the same community. For the single experienced aspirator, the technical failure rate was 9.8% whereas in the group with many aspirators it was 45.9%. This finding confirms that, although fine needle aspiration of the breast is considered easy to perform, skill on the part of the aspirator is important for satisfactory results.     

Posters. P1 A 2‐year audit of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology

Introduction Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the thyroid is a well‐established test in the clinical work‐up of patients with solitary nodules of the thyroid. Thyroid FNA does however have limitations and audit of diagnostic performance is important. Methods The histopathology archives of the Royal Victoria Hospital were searched for all thyroid resections and the histopathological diagnosis was correlated with the pre‐operative cytological diagnosis, where available. Special emphasis was placed on the accuracy of tumour diagnosis. Results A total of 173 cases were identified during the 2‐year period, of these 93 had available pre‐operative FNA. A total of 57 tumours were identified. A small number (six of 57) of significant discrepancies were identified. These included a malignant lymphoma diagnosed as Hashimoto's thyroiditis, a metastasis which the FNA had suggested was a medullary carcinoma and an insular carcinoma diagnosed as medullary carcinoma on FNA. False positives included a colloid cyst diagnosed as suspicious of malignancy and a cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma not confirmed on histology. Discussion At present, the majority of thyroid FNAs in our clinics are performed by surgeons and material is not routinely available for immunocytochemistry. In spite of these limitations, there were few major discrepancies. These might be reduced if pathologist aspirators were able to perform FNAs and collect material for further studies, where necessary. This would allow identification of medullary carcinomas and malignant lymphomas. Conclusion FNA of thyroid lesions is a useful investigation in our clinical setting, however, some areas of potential for improvement have been identified.     

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast: the influence of unsatisfactory samples on patient management

FNA continues to play an important role in the management of patients with breast lesions. However, the reliability and efficiency of the FNA service depends heavily on the quality of the specimens. We have audited the rate of 'inadequate FNAs' at intervals over the last 5 years and related our findings to the clinical expertise of the aspirator. We have also correlated the rate of inadequate FNAs with the percentage of patients who had an FNA preceding a definitive diagnosis of cancer. We report trends in the rate of inadequate samples, and subsequent diagnosis of cancer, over a 5‐year period. The percentage of breast FNA samples reported as inadequate was 46.8% in 1988–89, falling to 20% in 1991–92 with the introduction of an FNA clinic, and rising to 30.6% in 1993. The rates of cancer following inadequate FNA were 15.7%, 16.1% and 4.2%, respectively, and the percentage of patients with cancer having a preceding inadequate FNA were 37.5%, 13.2% and 7.1%. Possible explanations for the apparent paradox between increasing numbers of inadequate FNA specimens and a falling breast cancer rate are discussed.     

Posters

Introduction  Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the thyroid is a well-established test in the clinical work-up of patients with solitary nodules of the thyroid. Thyroid FNA does however have limitations and audit of diagnostic performance is important.
Methods  The histopathology archives of the Royal Victoria Hospital were searched for all thyroid resections and the histopathological diagnosis was correlated with the pre-operative cytological diagnosis, where available. Special emphasis was placed on the accuracy of tumour diagnosis.
Results  A total of 173 cases were identified during the 2-year period, of these 93 had available pre-operative FNA. A total of 57 tumours were identified. A small number (six of 57) of significant discrepancies were identified. These included a malignant lymphoma diagnosed as Hashimoto's thyroiditis, a metastasis which the FNA had suggested was a medullary carcinoma and an insular carcinoma diagnosed as medullary carcinoma on FNA. False positives included a colloid cyst diagnosed as suspicious of malignancy and a cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma not confirmed on histology.
Discussion  At present, the majority of thyroid FNAs in our clinics are performed by surgeons and material is not routinely available for immunocytochemistry. In spite of these limitations, there were few major discrepancies. These might be reduced if pathologist aspirators were able to perform FNAs and collect material for further studies, where necessary. This would allow identification of medullary carcinomas and malignant lymphomas.
Conclusion  FNA of thyroid lesions is a useful investigation in our clinical setting, however, some areas of potential for improvement have been identified.     

Fine Needle Aspiration of Palpable Breast Lumps: A 1-Year Audit Using the Cytospin Method

A fine-needle aspiration (FNA) service for the diagnosis of palpable breast lumps was started at the Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK, in November 1989. Over the subsequent year, 407 FNAs were taken from 393 women. A simple technique was used which involved the surgeon flushing the aspirate into 10 ml of Cytospin collection fluid; cytocentrifuge preparations were then safely and conveniently prepared in the laboratory. Slides were stained with Papanicolaou and H&E. The method detected 112 out of a total of 121 cancers (92.6%); of the nine that were undetected, five aspirates were inadequate and four were falsely reported as negative. There were no false positives. The overall inadequate rate was 11.0%. Excluding inadequate samples, the absolute sensitivity was 89.7% and complete sensitivity 96.6% with 94.4% specificity. This 1-year audit has shown the Cytospin method of FNA in palpable breast disease to have a favourable sensitivity and specificity, and therefore to be an alternative to conventional FNA using direct smears.     

Renal fine needle aspiration cytology

OBJECTIVE: To audit and evaluate the pitfalls in renal fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 180 renal FNAs from 163 patients, encountered at Canberra Hospital, Australian Capital Territory, between June 1989 and July 1997 was undertaken. The FNA procedures had been performed by radiologists under computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) guidance. The study correlated the FNA results with biopsy findings and clinical outcome. RESULTS: The initial cytologic diagnoses included 84 (47%) benign, 6 (3%) atypical, 7 (4%) suspicious, 70 (39%) malignant and 13 (7%) inadequate. Six of the 13 cytologically inadequate group, on further investigation, had malignant histology. The benign cytologic categories contained 79 benign conditions and 5 cases with a malignant outcome. The atypical cytologic group contained 5 benign and 1 malignant case. All nine cytologically suspicious cases had malignant histology. The cytologically malignant group contained 62 malignant, 7 benign and 1 patient lost to follow-up. The sensitivity was 92.5%, specificity was 91.9%, positive predictive value was 89.9%, negative predictive value was 94.0%, and efficacy of the test was 92.2%. CONCLUSION: Renal FNA can provide an accurate diagnosis in most instances; however, aspiration cytology of the kidney has limitations and pitfalls. Low grade renal cell carcinoma has to be differentiated from oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma, renal infarct and reactive conditions. Renal FNA has a high negative predictive value, which is useful in reassuring patients with radiologically and cytologically benign lesions. Negative FNA does not exclude malignancy in the presence of a radiologic suspicion.     

Value of Repeating A Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveTo assess the value of repeating a biopsy when the initial thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is nondiagnostic.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2003, 4,311 thyroid FNAs were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, of which 220 (5%) were nondiagnostic. Among 189 patients whose medical records were available for retrospective review, 106 underwent a repeated FNA (FNA #2), and 14 had a second repeated FNA (FNA #3). Thyroid ultrasonography was used in the evaluation in 113 FNAs.ResultsThe first and second repeated FNAs were diagnostic in 58% (62 of 106 patients) and 50% (7 of 14 patients), respectively. The rate of malignant disease in patients with no repeated FNAs versus 1 or more repeated FNAs was 4.8% (4 of 83) versus 11.3% (12 of 106), respectively. Ultrasound-guided FNA yielded a diagnosis among 33 of 113 biopsies (29.2%), and FNA without ultrasound guidance provided a diagnosis in 30 of 159 biopsies (18.9%). Thus, the use of thyroid ultrasonography significantly improved the likelihood of establishing a diagnosis (P = 0.017). We found that repeating the FNA up to 2 times provides a diagnosis in up to 60% of cases.ConclusionThe overall prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with nondiagnostic FNA is not trivial—8.5% in our study group of 189 patients. An aggressive approach toward nondiagnostic FNA biopsies is recommended, with performance of at least 2 repeated FNA biopsies, preferably with the help of ultrasound guidance. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:735-742)     

P-20DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL SMEARS AND THINPREP SAMPLES IN CERVICAL SCREENING

Thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the first choice procedure for differentiating between benign and malignant/suspicious lesions. Despite being highly sensitive and specific, it unfortunately has high inadequacy rates, with false-negatives reported in most series. The fundamental contribution of the aspirator's skill, experience and expertise to inadequacy rates is well documented, differing between both individuals and aspirator groups. We performed a retrospective audit comparing inadequacy rates of cytopathologists and clinicians for all thyroid FNAs performed from 2002–2005 within the Hammersmith Hospitals Trust. A crude cost-effectiveness was estimated, and using histological data where available, positive and negative powers (65.5% and 87.9% respectively), sensitivity (61.5%) and specificity (89.7%) were calculated. Pathologists were found to have significantly ( P  = 0.001) lower inadequacy rates (2.8%) than clinicians (16.1%) and were also more cost-effective (non-significant), with micropapillary carcinomas and lymphomas being identified as the main sources of false-negatives. We thus propose updated protocols to reduce inadequacy and false-negative rates, improve thyroid cancer diagnosis and the quality of patient care within our centre.     

Posters. P19 Cervical carcinoma with metastases to the tympanic membrane: an unusual presentation

Introduction Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a well‐established diagnostic technique which is frequently used to diagnose head and neck neoplasms. Clinical decisions concerning treatment of malignant salivary gland tumours, the extent of surgery and advisability of pre‐operative irradiation can be helped by prior knowledge of tumour type. Aim The aim of this study was to do an audit of all salivary gland FNAs carried out in Beaumont Hospital over a 14‐year period. Methods All salivary gland FNAs between 1989 and 2002 were reviewed. Where available, the corresponding follow‐up histological specimens were studied. Results During this 14‐year period, 305 patients with salivary gland lesions had FNA of the lesion performed. The total number of aspirates performed was 343. Of these, 184 had histologies available for follow‐up. Eighty‐nine aspirates were reported as inadequate; 89 as inflammatory, normal or consistent with cyst contents. One hundred and thirteen aspirates were diagnosed as a benign entity. Thirty‐three aspirates were reported as malignant (21 of which were felt to be primary to the salivary gland and 12 metastatic). Sixteen cases were called suspicious. Good correlation between FNA findings and histology was seen in the majority of cases (145 of 183). Some diagnostic problem areas were identified. These included the following: lymphomas (seven called benign on FNA), Warthin's tumour (seven not diagnosed or misdiagnosed on FNA) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (one reported as pleomorhic adenoma and one as benign/cystic on FNA). Seven pleomorphic adenomas were not diagnosed on FNA pre‐operatively, predominantly due to inadequacy of the specimen. Three other malignancies (acinic cell carcinoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma and carcinoma ex‐pleomorphic adenoma), while not diagnosed on FNA, were called suspicious, with re‐biopsy advised. Conclusion FNA cytology of salivary glands is an accurate method for evaluation of both benign and malignant lesions, enabling optimum surgical and adjuvant therapy decision‐making pre‐operatively. Well‐defined problem areas are identified and, therefore, clinicopathological correlation is required in these cases.     

BSCC Code of Practice – fine needle aspiration cytology

The British Society for Clinical Cytology Code of Practice on fine needle aspiration cytology complements that on exfoliative cytopathology, which was published in the last issue ( Cytopathology 2009; 20 :211–23). Both have been prepared with wide consultation within and outside the BSCC and have been endorsed by the Royal College of Pathologists. A separate code of practice for gynaecological cytopathology is in preparation. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is an accepted first line investigation for mass lesions, which may be targeted by palpation or a variety of imaging methods. Although FNA cytology has been shown to be a cost-effective, reliable technique its accurate interpretation depends on obtaining adequately cellular samples prepared to a high standard. Its accuracy and cost-effectiveness can be seriously compromised by inadequate samples. Although cytopathologists, radiologists, nurses or clinicians may take FNAs, they must be adequately trained, experienced and subject to regular audit. The best results are obtained when a pathologist or an experienced and trained biomedical scientist (cytotechnologist) provides immediate on-site assessment of sample adequacy whether or not the FNA requires image-guidance. This COP provides evidence-based recommendations for setting up FNA services, managing the patients, taking the samples, preparing the slides, collecting material for ancillary tests, providing rapid on-site assessment, classifying the diagnosis and providing a final report. Costs, cost-effectiveness and rare complications are taken into account as well as the time and resources required for quality control, audit and correlation of cytology with histology and outcome. Laboratories are expected to have an effective quality management system conforming to the requirements of a recognised accreditation scheme such as Clinical Pathology Accreditation (UK) Ltd.     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Improved fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results with a near patient diagnosis service for breast lesions

This study is a review of the quality of FNA cytology results for breast lesions approximately 18 months before and 10 months after a change from a rapid diagnosis FNA service with consultant pathologist aspirators to a conventional FNA service with clinician aspirators of varied experience. The setting was symptomatic breast clinic in a large hospital in rural New Zealand acting as a tertiary referral centre for a population of 550,000. The results were collected retrospectively and prospectively. The quality of results for pathologist aspirators (total 810) and clinician aspirators (total 403) was compared using the definitions of the NHS Breast Screening Program Guidelines for Cytology Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. There were statistically significant differences in specificity (biopsy cases only) with 73% for pathologists and 49% for clinicians, specificity (full) with 74% and 56%, inadequate rate with 23% and 37%, and complete sensitivity with 76% and 67%. The use of pathologist aspirators allowed the specimens to be reported in a few minutes. Specimens taken by clinicians took at least 30 min to report. The financial aspects of the two approaches are discussed. When compared with clinician aspirators, pathologist aspirators obtained better quality results and these were reported more quickly.     

Assessment of fine needle aspiration as a screening test for occult prostatic carcinoma

As part of an ongoing study of objective parameters of prognostic value in prostatic carcinoma, a routine procedure was developed to aspirate all prostates prior to surgery. These targets were different from those of other workers in the field of prostatic fine needle aspiration (FNA), who generally advocate that FNA be confined to suspicious nodules. The aspirations were performed by a large group of practicing urologists who had no special training in prostatic FNA except for guidelines provided by their peers and information available in the literature. This approach permitted an assessment of the performance of FNA as a screening test rather than as a diagnostic procedure. During the period from January 1983 to February 1987, 1,683 patients had prostatic FNAs performed (plus subsequent histologic study). The following diagnoses were rendered: "inadequate/scanty specimen" in 625 cases (37%), "negative/atypical" in 844 cases (50%) and "suspicious/positive" in 214 cases (13%). Histologic examination showed stage A1 prostatic adenocarcinoma in 18 patients. The cytologic diagnoses on these 18 patients were inadequate/scanty in 3 (17%), negative/atypical in 13 (72%) and suspicious/positive in 2 (11%). Of the 214 patients with a positive/suspicious diagnosis by FNA, the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma was confirmed by tissue evidence in 200; the other 14 patients had either no evidence of prostatic carcinoma on surgical biopsy (needle biopsy/transurethral resection/suprapubic prostatectomy) or had no surgical biopsy. Eight of the 14 patients developed clinical evidence of carcinoma, 1 died of urinary bladder carcinoma and 1 was lost to follow-up. In the remaining four patients, there is still no evidence of prostatic carcinoma after about one-and-one-half years of follow-up. These results indicate that (1) specialized training is required in order to obtain adequate smears by prostatic FNA; (2) prostatic FNA is not a good screening technique for detecting stage A1 prostatic carcinoma; and (3) a positive diagnosis by prostatic FNA, even when not confirmed by tissue biopsy, is still an indication of disease.     

P‐19THE LABORATORY AND CLINICAL ADVANTAGES OF PROMPT CERVICAL SMEAR HISTOLOGY MISMATCH AUDIT

Thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the first choice procedure for differentiating between benign and malignant/suspicious lesions. Despite being highly sensitive and specific, it unfortunately has high inadequacy rates, with false‐negatives reported in most series. The fundamental contribution of the aspirator's skill, experience and expertise to inadequacy rates is well documented, differing between both individuals and aspirator groups. We performed a retrospective audit comparing inadequacy rates of cytopathologists and clinicians for all thyroid FNAs performed from 2002–2005 within the Hammersmith Hospitals Trust. A crude cost‐effectiveness was estimated, and using histological data where available, positive and negative powers (65.5% and 87.9% respectively), sensitivity (61.5%) and specificity (89.7%) were calculated. Pathologists were found to have significantly (P = 0.001) lower inadequacy rates (2.8%) than clinicians (16.1%) and were also more cost‐effective (non‐significant), with micropapillary carcinomas and lymphomas being identified as the main sources of false‐negatives. We thus propose updated protocols to reduce inadequacy and false‐negative rates, improve thyroid cancer diagnosis and the quality of patient care within our centre.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of vaginal cuff lesions

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the vaginal cuff in various lesions in the female genital tract. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-six FNAs of vaginal cuff lesions were performed at our institution from 1994 to 1998. All cases were reviewed. Data on clinical histories and follow-up, if available, were collected. Histologic material was reviewed. Fourteen gynecologic (cervicovaginal) smears performed on these patients within six months prior to the FNA were also reviewed. RESULTS: Two of twenty-six (7.7%) FNAs were non-diagnostic due to poor cellular yield. Four lesions were classified as benign (16.7%). The remaining 20 FNAs were classified as malignant (83%) and were consistent with the clinical history in all cases. CONCLUSION: The results show that FNA of the vaginal cuff appears to be a simple and accurate procedure for detecting benign and malignant lesions of the female genitourinary tract. Clinical indications, cytologic techniques and potential pitfalls are identical to those of FNAs at other sites.     

Application of the probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine needle aspiration in males

OBJECTIVE: To apply the probabilistic approach to a series offine needle aspiration (FNA) samples of male breast lesions and determine the accuracy and reproducibility of this method of reporting in men. STUDY DESIGN: All male breast surgical specimens with a preoperative breast FNA at our institution from 1994 to 2005 were identified. The FNAs were blindly reviewed by 2 groups of observers and classified in 1 of 5 categories using published reporting guidelines: positive, suspicious, atypical, proliferative without atypia and unremarkable. The histologic and cytologic diagnoses were correlated. The interobserver variation was determined. RESULTS: A total of 138 FNAs were performed for 123 male patients. Histologic correlation was available for 23 satisfactory FNAs. A total of 11 of 11 carcinomas (100%) were classified as positive, suspicious or atypical. Of 12 benign masses, 11 (91.6%) were classified as proliferative without atypia or unremarkable. One case of gynecomastia was classified as atypical by 1 observer but deemed not atypical with consensus review. The kappa statistic for benign and atypical/suspicious/malignant categories was 0.90. CONCLUSION: Based on this series, the probabilistic approach can be applied to the reporting of FNAs of male breast lesions. Gynecomastia may result in an atypical cytologic diagnosis.     

Repeatedly nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspirations do not modify malignancy risk

Objective: Thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic (ND) fine-needle aspirations (FNA) typically undergo repeat sampling. While repeat FNA is often diagnostic, little is known regarding the significance of repeatedly ND aspirates. Limited data suggest there is very low, if any, risk of malignancy for repeatedly ND FNAs. Study Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of ND thyroid FNAs over a nearly 6-year period at our institution to further address this question. Results: There were 834 ND thyroid FNAs, representing 694 distinct thyroid nodules. Repeat FNA was performed after an initial ND aspirate in 52% of cases (363/694); 19% (70/363) had at least one additional ND diagnosis on repeat FNA. Surgical follow-up was available for 57 cases. Malignancy was identified histologically in 21% (9/42) of nodules after a single ND FNA and in 20% (3/15) of nodules with 2 or more repeatedly ND aspirates. Accounting for all benign cytologic follow-up, the overall risk of malignancy was 4% [12/303; 3.5% (9/255) following a single ND FNA and 6.3% (3/48) after repeated ND FNAs]. Conclusion: We observed no modification of malignancy risk when repeated FNAs were ND. Clinical management for an ND aspirate should remain repeat aspiration along with clinical and sonographic correlation.     

Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology

N. Dincer, S. Balci, A. Yazgan, G. Guney, R. Ersoy, B. Cakir and G. Guler
Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology Objective: To report our experience of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) rate and outcome. Methods: Among 7658 patients with 19 569 nodules, 524 (2.7%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNA). After exclusion of patients with simultaneous nodules that were suspicious for follicular neoplasm or malignancy or that were malignant, 368 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. The outcome of 146 patients who had undergone surgery or repeated fine needle aspirate at the time of preparation of this study was evaluated. The original FNAs were matched to repeated FNAs and thyroidectomy or diagnostic lobectomy specimens. Results: Seventy‐two (19.6%) of the 368 patients had directly undergone surgery, either a lobectomy or a thyroidectomy: of these, 27 (37.5%) had neoplastic nodules (21 were malignant). Seventy‐four (20.1%) of the 368 patients had repeat FNA. On second FNA, 47 of 74 (63.5%) were benign, three were suspicious for follicular neoplasm, one was malignant and 23 (31.1%) were non‐diagnostic. Four patients had a third FNA: two were AUS/FLUS, one was malignant and one non‐diagnostic. One patient had a fourth FNA, which was diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Sixteen (21.6%) of 74 patients with repeat FNA had surgery: three of these had neoplastic nodules (two were malignant). Overall, 88 of the 368 (23.9%) patients had a thyroidectomy of which 30 (34.1%) were neoplastic and 23 (26.1%) malignant. The neoplastic rate for patients who were once diagnosed with AUS/FLUS was 8.2% and the malignancy rate 6.3%. The malignancy rate for patients on follow‐up at the time we prepared the study was 15.7% (23/146); 222 remained on follow‐up without surgery or repeat FNA or were managed elsewhere. Conclusions: Although in this category repeat FNA is expected rather than excision, we suggest evaluation of all AUS/FLUS patients in multidisciplinary meetings to decide management and recommend follow‐up of all patients with this diagnosis.     

Timing of repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration in the management of thyroid nodules

Objective: The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) recommends repeat aspirations be done at least 3 months following the initial aspiration to prevent false-positive misinterpretations due to reactive/reparative changes. Because limited data exists, we reviewed our own data to ascertain the recommendation. Study Design: We retrospectively reviewed thyroid FNAs accessioned in the Cytology Laboratory at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Mass., USA, from January 2006 to December 2008. We identified patients with repeat aspirates of a single lesion and those with thyroidectomy specimens. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses along with time between FNAs were recorded. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the distribution among nondiagnostic, suboptimal, and adequate categories with respect to the timing of repeat FNA (p = 0.25). Forty-six percent of the lesions that were nondiagnostic/suboptimal initially yielded the same results on repeat. Twenty-eight percent of initially adequate specimens were nondiagnostic/suboptimal on repeat (p = 0.04). Nine percent of those with an initial atypical diagnosis had the same diagnosis on repeat, while 2.6% of those who did not have an initial atypical diagnosis had an atypical diagnosis on repeat (p = 0.29). False positives between early (16%) and late (12%) repeats were not statistically significant (p = 0.74). Conclusion: The diagnostic yield and accuracy of repeat FNA is independent of the time interval between procedures but may be related to the original FNA diagnosis.