Durable remission of diabetes after bariatric surgery: What is the underlying pathway?

Background: In the past, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) was regarded as a progressive, incurable disease for which palliative therapy could not, over the long term, prevent the associated amputations, blindness, renal failure, and early mortality. This is no longer true. Full and durable remission of type 2 DM, with major decreases in morbidity and mortality, is now achieved regularly with several types of surgery that reduce contact between food and the foregut.Objectives: The aims of this article are to review the impact of bariatric surgery on obesity, remission of DM, and obesity-related morbidity and mortality, and the possible mechanisms for this advance.Methods: This article is based on our 2 meta-analyses of the literature published through April 30, 2006, as well as the most significant reports in the bariatric surgical literature that have been published in English since April 30, 2006. The studies included in our second meta-analysis provided the details of the methodology for the present literature review, including the levels of evidence.Results: Results of our 2 meta-analyses were published previously. Briefly, the analyses revealed that the clinical and laboratory manifestations of type 2 DM resolved or improved in most of the patients who underwent bariatric surgery; the responses were greatest in the patients who lost the most excess body weight; and the improvements were maintained for ≥2 years. The studies reported that intestinal operations such as gastric bypass reduced contact between food and the foregut, produced full and durable remission of DM, reduced mortality, and reversed other comorbidities associated with severe obesity (eg, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux, hypertension, stress incontinence). Insulin levels decreased markedly after surgery, as did glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and fasting blood glucose levels. Although these effects were initially attributed to weight loss, the rapid reversal of DM within a matter of days after surgery suggest that bariatric surgery changes the signaling mechanism of the gut with pancreatic islet cells, muscles, fat, the liver, and other organs.Conclusions: Bariatric surgery has opened new vistas, producing durable full remission of type 2 DM—a breakthrough previously considered impossible—with normalization of A1C levels over time and discontinuation of all antidiabetes medication for many patients. These advances create new opportunities for exploring the mechanisms of type 2 DM and its control through pharmaceutical approaches. DM is no longer an irreversible, incurable, or hopeless disease.     

Impact of Weight loss Trajectory Following Randomization to Bariatric Surgery on Long-Term Diabetes Glycemic and Cardiometabolic Parameters

Objective: It is unclear whether acute weight loss or the chronic trajectory of weight loss after bariatric surgery is associated with long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) glycemic improvement. This ancillary study of the Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently (STAMPEDE) trial aimed to answer this question.Methods: In STAMPEDE, 150 patients with T2DM were randomized to bariatric surgery, and 96 had 5-year follow-up. Data post–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 49) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 47) were analyzed. We defined percent weight loss in the first year as negative percent decrease from baseline weight to lowest weight in the first year. Percent weight regain was positive percent change from lowest weight in the first year to fifth year. Weight change was then correlated with cardiometabolic (CM) and glycemic outcomes at 5 years using Spearman rank correlations and multivariate analysis.Results: In both RYGB and SG, less weight loss in the first year positively correlated with higher 5-year glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (RYGB, β = +0.13; P<.001 and SG, β = 0.14; P<.001). In SG, greater weight regain from nadir positively correlated with higher HbA1c (β = 0.06; P = .02), but not in RYGB. Reduced first-year weight loss was also correlated with increased 5-year triglycerides (β = 1.81; P = .01), but not systolic blood pressure. Weight regain did not correlate with CM outcomes.Conclusion: Acute weight loss may be more important for T2DM glycemic control following both RYGB and SG as compared with weight regain. Clinicians should aim to assist patients with achieving maximal weight loss in the first year post-op to maximize long-term health of patients.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SG = sleeve gastrectomy; STAMPEDE = Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG = triglyceride     

Bariatric surgery for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin: Clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness analyses

BackgroundAlthough bariatric surgery is well established as an effective treatment for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there exists reluctance to increase its availability for patients with severe T2DM. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of bariatric surgery on T2DM resolution in patients with obesity and T2DM requiring insulin (T2DM-Ins) using data from a national database and to develop a health economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgery in this cohort when compared to best medical treatment (BMT).Methods and findingsClinical data from the National Bariatric Surgical Registry (NBSR), a comprehensive database of bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom, were extracted to analyse outcomes of patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins who underwent primary bariatric surgery between 2009 and 2017. Outcomes for this group were combined with data sourced from a comprehensive literature review in order to develop a state-transition microsimulation model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus BMT for patients over a 5-year time horizon. The main outcome measure for the clinical study was insulin cessation at 1-year post-surgery: relative risks (RR) summarising predictive factors were determined, unadjusted, and after adjusting for variables including age, initial body mass index (BMI), duration of T2DM, and weight loss. Main outcome measures for the economic evaluation were total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at willingness-to-pay threshold of GBP£20,000.A total of 2,484 patients were eligible for inclusion, of which 1,847 had 1-year follow-up data (mean age of 51 years, mean initial BMI 47.2 kg/m², and 64% female). 67% of patients no longer required insulin at 1-year postoperatively: these rates persisted for 4 years. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was associated with a higher rate of insulin cessation (71.7%) than sleeve gastrectomy (SG; 64.5%; RR 0.92, confidence interval (CI) 0.86–0.99) and adjustable gastric band (AGB; 33.6%; RR 0.45, CI 0.34–0.60; p < 0.001). When adjusted for percentage total weight loss and demographic variables, insulin cessation following surgery was comparable for RYGB and SG (RR 0.97, CI 0.90–1.04), with AGB having the lowest cessation rates (RR 0.55, CI 0.40–0.74; p < 0.001). Over 5 years, bariatric surgery was cost saving compared to BMT (total cost GBP£22,057 versus GBP£26,286 respectively, incremental difference GBP£4,229). This was due to lower treatment costs as well as reduced diabetes-related complications costs and increased health benefits. Limitations of this study include loss to follow-up of patients within the NBSR dataset and that the time horizon for the economic analysis is limited to 5 years. In addition, the study reflects current medical and surgical treatment regimens for this cohort of patients, which may change.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed that in patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins, bariatric surgery was associated with high rates of postoperative cessation of insulin therapy, which is, in turn, a major driver of overall reductions in direct healthcare cost. Our findings suggest that a strategy utilising bariatric surgery for patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins is cost saving to the national healthcare provider (National Health Service (NHS)) over a 5-year time horizon.

Emma Rose McGlone and colleagues report the clinical and cost- effectiveness of bariatric surgery for patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: understanding weight loss and improvements in type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery

Obesity increases the likelihood of diseases like type 2 diabetes (T2D), heart disease, and cancer, and is one of the most serious public health problems of this century. In contrast to ineffectual prevention strategies, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological therapies, bariatric surgery is a very effective treatment for morbid obesity and also markedly improves associated comorbidities like T2D. However, weight loss and resolution of T2D after bariatric surgery is heterogeneous and specific to type of bariatric procedure performed. Conventional mechanisms like intestinal malabsorption and gastric restriction do not fully explain this, and potent changes in appetite and the enteroinsular axis, as a result of anatomical reorganization and altered hormonal, neuronal, and nutrient signaling, are the portended cause. Uniquely these signaling changes appear to override vigorous homeostatic defenses of stable body weight and compelling self-gratifying motivations to eat and to reverse defects in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity. Here we review mechanisms of weight loss and T2D resolution after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy bariatric surgery, two markedly different procedures with robust clinical outcomes.     

Provider Practice Habits And Barriers To Care In Obesity Management In A Large Multicenter Health System

Objective: To identify provider recommendations and barriers in obesity management in a multicenter academic health system with extensive weight-loss management resources.Methods: A 26-question online survey was sent to attending physicians, trainees, and advanced practice providers in primary care specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, women's health) and endocrinology.Results: The survey response rate was 26% (111/430). Of respondents, 50% were internal medicine, 24% family medicine, 16% women's health, and 9% endocrinology. The majority were attending physicians (54%) and residents (40%). About 50% of respondents advised weight loss for a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m² in >50% of clinic visits. Limited time (82%) was the most common reason for not discussing weight loss, followed by the perception that discussion would not change patient behavior, insufficient knowledge, and discomfort broaching the subject. Common barriers to prescribing anti-obesity medications included limited experience (57%) and concern for adverse reactions (26%). Only 44% offered bariatric surgery to >50% of their patients who met criteria. Primary reasons for not referring included concerns of high surgical risk from comorbidities (57%) and potential adverse events (32%). Endocrinology had the highest referral to surgery. Attending physicians and fellows were more likely than residents to advise weight loss at lower BMI, offer medications, and refer to bariatric surgery.Conclusion: Our study reveals reluctance and lack of primary care confidence in managing obesity with pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery, especially in the earlier stages of obesity. Barriers to care include lack of clinic time, limited experience, and concerns about treatment risks.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IRB = Institutional Review Board     

Melanocortin-4 Receptor Mutations and Polymorphisms Do Not Affect Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery is the most effective long term weight-loss therapy for severe and morbidly obese patients. Melanocortin-4 Receptor (MC4R) mutations, the most frequent known cause of monogenic obesity, affect the regulation of energy homeostasis. The impact of such mutations on weight loss after bariatric surgery is still debated.The objective is to determine the impact of MC4R status on weight loss in obese subjects over one year after bariatric surgery.A total of 648 patients, who were referred to bariatric surgery in a single clinical nutrition department, were genotyped for their MC4R status. The following four groups were categorized: functional MC4R mutations, MC4R single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): Val103Ile (V103L) and Ile251Leu (I251L), MC4R variant rs17782313 (downstream of MC4R) and MC4R SNP A-178C on the promoter. Each patient was matched with two randomly paired controls without mutation. Matching factors were age, sex, baseline weight and type of surgery procedure (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding). We compared weight loss between cases and controls at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.Among 648 patients, we identified 9 carriers of functional MC4R mutations, 10 carriers of MC4R V103L and I251L SNPs, 7 carriers of the rs17792313 variant and 22 carriers of the A-178C SNP. Weight loss at 3, 6 and 12 months did not differ between cases and controls, whatever the MC4R mutations.This is the first case-control study to show that MC4R mutations and polymorphisms do not affect weight loss and body composition over one year after bariatric surgery.     

Increased Bone Turnover in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Randomized to Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical Therapy at 5 Years

Objective: The aim of our study was to determine the 5-year outcomes of bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy on bone turnover in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from the STAMPEDE trial.Methods: This was an ancillary investigation of a 5-year randomized control trial at a single tertiary care center involving 95 patients aged 48.5 ± 8 years with obesity (body mass index &lsqb;BMI], 36.5 ± 3.6 kg/m²) and uncontrolled T2DM (glycated hemoglobin 9.3 ± 1.6% &lsqb;78 mmol/mol]). Patients were randomized to intensive medical therapy (IMT; n = 25), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; n = 37), or sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n = 33) for diabetes treatment. Bone formation marker osteocalcin (OC), bone resorption marker serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were assessed at baseline and 5 years postintervention. Analysis with key clinical parameters and outcomes (i.e., age, menopausal status, gender, weight loss) was performed.Results: Percent change in CTX at 5 years increased in both surgical groups, by 137 ± 108% in RYGB (P<.001) and 61.1 ± 90% in SG (P<.001) compared to 29.8 ± 93% in IMT (P = .12). OC also increased from baseline in the surgical cohorts, by 138 ± 19% in RYGB (P<.001) and 71 ± 69% in SG (P<.001) compared to 43.8 ± 121.1% in IMT (P = .83). Increases in both CTX and OC correlated linearly with increases in PTH levels in RYGB patients (P<.001). Increase in CTX correlated with decreased BMI in SG patients (P = .039).Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, bone turnover remains chronically elevated at 5 years following RYGB, and to a lesser extent in SG patients.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; BTM = bone turnover marker; CTX = C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; IMT = intensive medical therapy; OC = osteocalcin; PPI = proton-pump inhibitor; PTH = parathyroid hormone; RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG = sleeve gastrectomy; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TZD = thiazolidinedione     

Bariatric Surgery in the United Kingdom: A Cohort Study of Weight Loss and Clinical Outcomes in Routine Clinical Care

Background

Bariatric surgery is becoming a more widespread treatment for obesity. Comprehensive evidence of the long-term effects of contemporary surgery on a broad range of clinical outcomes in large populations treated in routine clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study was to measure the association between bariatric surgery, weight, body mass index, and obesity-related co-morbidities.

Methods and Findings

This was an observational retrospective cohort study using data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. All 3,882 patients registered in the database and with bariatric surgery on or before 31 December 2014 were included and matched by propensity score to 3,882 obese patients without surgery. The main outcome measures were change in weight and body mass index over 4 y; incident diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, angina, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, fractures, obstructive sleep apnoea, and cancer; mortality; and resolution of hypertension and T2DM. Weight measures were available for 3,847 patients between 1 and 4 mo, 2,884 patients between 5 and 12 mo, and 2,258 patients between 13 and 48 mo post-procedure. Bariatric surgery patients exhibited rapid weight loss for the first four postoperative months, at a rate of 4.98 kg/mo (95% CI 4.88–5.08). Slower weight loss was sustained to the end of 4 y. Gastric bypass (6.56 kg/mo) and sleeve gastrectomy (6.29 kg/mo) were associated with greater initial weight reduction than gastric banding (2.77 kg/mo). Protective hazard ratios (HRs) were detected for bariatric surgery for incident T2DM, 0.68 (95% CI 0.55–0.83); hypertension, 0.35 (95% CI 0.27–0.45); angina, 0.59 (95% CI 0.40–0.87);MI, 0.28 (95% CI 0.10–0.74); and obstructive sleep apnoea, 0.55 (95% CI 0.40–0.87). Strong associations were found between bariatric surgery and the resolution of T2DM, with a HR of 9.29 (95% CI 6.84–12.62), and between bariatric surgery and the resolution of hypertension, with a HR of 5.64 (95% CI 2.65–11.99). No association was detected between bariatric surgery and fractures, cancer, or stroke. Effect estimates for mortality found no protective association with bariatric surgery overall, with a HR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.66–1.43). The data used were recorded for the management of patients in primary care and may be subject to inaccuracy, which would tend to lead to underestimates of true relative effect sizes.

Conclusions

Bariatric surgery as delivered in the UK healthcare system is associated with dramatic weight loss, sustained at least 4 y after surgery. This weight loss is accompanied by substantial improvements in pre-existing T2DM and hypertension, as well as a reduced risk of incident T2DM, hypertension, angina, MI, and obstructive sleep apnoea. Widening the availability of bariatric surgery could lead to substantial health benefits for many people who are morbidly obese.     

“Metabolic” Surgery For Treatment Of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo discuss the potential contribution of “metabolic” surgery in providing optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsA literature search was performed with use of PubMed, and the clinical experience of the authors was also considered.ResultsBariatric—or, more appropriately, metabolic—surgical procedures have been shown to provide dramatic improvement in blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and lipid control in obese patients with T2DM. In these patients, metabolic surgery involves a low risk of short-term mortality and a significant long-term survival advantage, whereas the diagnosis of diabetes is associated with significant long-term mortality. Experimental studies in animals and clinical trials suggest that gastrointestinal bypass procedures can control diabetes and associated metabolic alterations by mechanisms independent of weight loss. As a result, the use of bariatric surgery and experimental gastrointestinal manipulations to treat T2DM is increasing, even among less obese patients. Although body mass index (BMI) currently is the most important factor for identifying candidates for bariatric surgery, evidence shows that a specific cutoff BMI value cannot accurately predict successful surgical outcomes. Furthermore, BMI appears limited in defining the risk profile for patients with T2DM.ConclusionCurrent BMI-based criteria for performance of bariatric surgery are not adequate for determining eligibility for operative treatment in patients with diabetes. Large clinical trials, comparing bariatric surgery versus optimal medical care of patients with T2DM, should be given priority in order to define the role of surgery in the management of diabetes. Recognizing the need to work as a multidisciplinary team that includes endocrinologists and surgeons is an initial step in addressing the issues and opportunities that surgery offers to diabetes care and research. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:624-631)     

Weight Gain and Management Concerns in Patients on Insulin Therapy

Background: The benefits of tight glycemic control in preventing the onset and progression of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are unarguable. The majority of patients with type 2 DM will eventually require insulin to achieve adequate glycemic control. Using insulin earlier rather than later in the course of type 2 DM may diminish the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia on β-cell function and therefore help prolong good glycemic control and prevent the occurrence of microvascular complications. However, weight gain is a potential adverse effect of insulin therapy.Objective: The goal of this article was to describe the benefit of insulin therapy early in the course of type 2 DM, review the association of weight gain with insulin therapy, and examine potential detrimental effects that insulin-associated weight gain could have in patients with type 2 DM.Methods: Materials used for this article were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966–2006). English-language articles were chosen using the search terms diabetes mellitus type 2, insulin, and obesity.Results: Intensive insulin therapy is often associated with weight gain. Although there is concern that weight gain in patients with type 2 DM may have adverse effects on risk factors for cardiovascular disease, unfavorable changes in blood pressure and lipid levels have not been consistently observed in clinical trials. Furthermore, clinical evidence, including data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, supports the view that intensive insulin therapy does not increase the risk for cardiovascular disease.Conclusions: Early insulin therapy in patients with type 2 DM may be a strategy that will help patients achieve and maintain good glycemic control, thereby reducing the risk of developing microvascular complications. Although weight gain is commonly associated with insulin therapy, it does not appear to put these patients at greater risk for cardiovascular disease.     

Long-Term,Sustained, Lifestyle-Induced Weight Loss in Severe Obesity: the Get-Real Program

Objective: To study the long-term effectiveness of a patient-centered, multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention treatment in patients medically eligible for bariatric surgery.Methods: Using a case-control study design, we compared treatment results for 98 adults (mean body mass index [BMI], 44.2 kg/m²) with the outcomes of 148 controls (mean BMI, 43.0 kg/m²) receiving standard care. The approach included a phased triage for inclusion, followed by 12 lifestyle intervention group sessions alternating with individual visits for behavior, diet, and exercise instructions.Results: At 2 years, weight loss averaged 15.3 ± 1.4 kg (P<.0010) (12 ± 1% of initial body weight [IBW], P<.001; 21 ± 2% of excess body weight [EBW], P<.001) in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; in completers, weight loss was 18.8 ± 1.5 kg (P<.001) (15 ± 1% IBW, P<.001; 26 ± 3% EBW, P<.001). A total of 42 patients lost ≥10% IBW. Controls remained weight stable (P =.35); 3% lost ≥10% IBW. Patients achieving weight loss that would be considered satisfactory for bariatric surgery included 20% who achieved ≥35% EBW loss, 29% who achieved a BMI <35 kg/m² (if starting BMI <50 kg/m²) or BMI <40 kg/m² (if starting BMI ≥50 kg/m²), and 37% who achieved EBW loss ≤50%. These values for completers were 31, 39, and 48%, respectively. In the 55 patients starting the program ≥4 years ago, weight loss maintenance of 12 ± 1% IBW (ITT, 16 ± 1% in completers) was observed.Conclusion: Substantial nonsurgical weight loss, maintained at 2 to 4 years, is achievable in severely obese patients using comprehensive lifestyle approaches; the efficacy/safety trade-off in obesity treatment is an important consideration in interpreting these results.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index EBW = excess body weight HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin IBW = initial body weight LOCFA = last observation carried forward analysis     

Hyperinsulinemia Associated With Acanthosis Nigricans,Finger Pebbles,Acrochordons, And The Sign Of Leser-Trélat

ObjectiveTo review common skin manifestations associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and to discuss a potential underlying mechanism for these manifestations.MethodsA PubMed literature search was conducted for articles describing the skin manifestations associated with hyperinsulinemia and type 2 DM. A case presentation describes a morbidly obese patient with type 2 DM treated with metformin who developed acanthosis nigricans, finger pebbles, scores of skin tags (acrochordons), and the sign of LeserTrelat (sudden onset shower of seborrheic keratoses) in the absence of internal malignancy.ResultsAcanthosis nigricans, acrochordons, and finger pebbles have been associated with type 2 DM and obesity. While the LeserTrelat sign is classically associated with internal malignancy, it can also be idiopathic. To our knowledge, this the first report of the occurrence of the LeserTrelat sign in a patient with DM absent internal malignancy.ConclusionSeveral skin manifestations can be seen in this patient with DM because of underlying insulin resistance and subsequent stimulation of insulinlike growth factor receptors. Management strategies could include weight loss, diet, and insulinsensitizing pharmacologic therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:522525)     

Hormone Substitution after Gastric Bypass Surgery in Patients with Hypopituitarism Secondary to Craniopharyngioma

Objective: Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are benign brain tumors presenting frequently in childhood and are treated by surgery with or without radiotherapy. About 50% of cured patients suffer from eating disorders and obesity due to hypothalamic damage, as well as hypopituitarism, necessitating subsequent hormone substitution therapy. Gastric bypass surgery has been reported to be an efficient treatment strategy for morbid hypothalamic obesity. However, so far it is unknown whether oral hormone substitution is affected by impaired intestinal drug absorption, potentially leading to severe hypopituitarism or pituitary crisis.Methods: Four morbidly obese CP patients with panhypopituitarism treated by gastric bypass surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. Dosages of hormone substitution therapy, blood concentrations of hormones, potential complications of impaired drug absorption, and anthropometric characteristics were investigated pre- and postoperatively after 6 to 14 months and 13 to 65 months.Results: In all CP patients (3 female/1 male; baseline body mass index, 49 ± 7 kg/m²), gastric bypass resulted in distinct weight loss (-35 ± 27 kg). In follow-up examinations, mean daily dosage of thyroid hormone (levothyroxine_baseline 156 ± 44 μg/day versus levothyroxine_follow-up 150 ± 30 μg/day), hydrocortisone (hydrocortisone_baseline 29 ± 12 mg/day versus hydrocortisone_follow-up 26 ± 2 mg/day), growth-hormone (somatotropin_baseline 0.9 ± 0.5 mg/day versus somatotropin_follow-up 1.0 ± 0.4 mg/day), and desmopressin (desmopressin_baseline 222 ± 96 μg/day versus desmopressin_follow-up 222 ± 96 μg/day) substitution was unchanged. No patient developed adrenal insufficiency. Oral thyroid/hydrocortisone absorption testing performed in 1 patient indicated sufficient gastrointestinal drug absorption after bariatric surgery.Conclusion: Our preliminary results suggest that oral hormone substitution therapy is not impaired following gastric bypass operation in CP patients with morbid obesity, indicating that it might be a safe and effective treatment strategy.Abbreviations:BMI = body mass indexCP = craniopharyngiomafT4 = free thyroxineGH = growth hormoneIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1     

Pregnancy loss and neonatal death in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to be a significant risk factor for pregnancy loss, either through still-birth or late intrauterine death or as the result of severe congenital malformation. Improved glycemic control and other advances in care substantially reduced the incidence of pregnancy loss in women with type 1 DM in most countries by the 1970s. However, because of a greater prevalence of obesity since the 1980s, the emergence of type 2 DM in pregnancy has become a significant problem. Although more pregnancies now occur in women with type 2 DM than in those with type 1 DM in many locations, relatively little information has been published about pregnancy loss in type 2 DM.Objectives: This article examines the prevalence and causes of pregnancy loss in type 1 and type 2 DM and identifies factors in addition to glycemic control that may influence pregnancy outcome.Methods: A MEDLINE search was conducted for recent literature on pregnancy loss in DM. Series reporting >200 pregnancies in type 1 DM and/or >100 pregnancies in type 2 DM were included.Results: Thirty-four studies were identified (15 in type 1 DM [1997-2007], 19 in type 2 DM [1986-2007]). In type 1 DM, major congenital anomalies now account for ~50% of pregnancy losses, and all-cause perinatal mortality remains higher than in the general population. Several studies have suggested that the perinatal mortality rate is higher in type 2 DM than in type 1 DM. Factors other than glycemic control probably explain this phenomenon: women with type 2 DM typically are older and more obese, and they come from disadvantaged communities—all risk factors for pregnancy loss, particularly late intrauterine death and chorioamnionitis. In some women, type 2 DM may be recognized for the first time during pregnancy; pregnancies in these women carry the same risks of pregnancy loss as those in women with established DM.Conclusions: Demographic changes in the prevalence of obesity suggest that the prevalence of type 2 DM in pregnancy will almost certainly increase. Although meticulous glycemic control is undoubtedly important in achieving good pregnancy outcomes, clinicians should be aware of the multiple risk factors faced by women with DM.     

Bariatric Surgery and the Role of the Clinical Endocrinologist: 2011 Update

ObjectiveTo discuss the emerging roles of bariatric surgery and clinical endocrinology within the context of obesity and diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plans and cost-effective strategies.MethodsRelevant literature is reviewed and clinical cases are presented.ResultsThe global obesity epidemic poses many challenges to clinical endocrinologists and has fomented a coordinated effort among specialists to revolutionize management paradigms. Technologic innovation drives the need for accelerated learning and research efforts in bariatric surgery. The national shortage of physicians with expertise in nutritional medicine compounds the management problems for this expanding patient population. Certain issues merit continued attention and research, such as gastric banding for mild obesity, surgery for treatment of diabetes, sleeve gastrectomy, and nutritional and metabolic consequences.ConclusionClinical endocrinologists should have a central role in the perioperative decision-making for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:788-797)     

Gut feelings about diabetes

Studies of patients going into diabetes remission after gastric bypass surgery have demonstrated the important role of the gut in glucose control. The improvement of type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass surgery occurs via weight dependent and weight independent mechanisms. The rapid improvement of glucose levels within days after the surgery, in relation to change of meal pattern, rapid nutrient transit, enhanced incretin release and improved incretin effect on insulin secretion, suggest mechanisms independent of weight loss. Alternatively, insulin sensitivity improves over time as a function of weight loss. The role of bile acids and microbiome in the metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery remains to be determined. While most patients after bariatric surgery experienced sustained weight loss and improved metabolism, small scale studies have shown weight regain and diabetes relapse, the mechanisms of which remain unknown.     

Diabetes,obesity, and erectile dysfunction

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity affect large parts of the population in the United States and around the world. These disorders are among the most common risk factors for erectile dysfunction (ED), because of their effects on the vasculature and the hormonal milieu.Objective: This article reviews the current literature on the connection between DM, obesity, and ED.Methods: Using the search terms erectile dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, hypogonadism, diabetes, and obesity, a systematic review of the available literature in the PubMed database was conducted. Relevant English-language publications (to August 2008) were identified.Results: ED is highly prevalent in men with both DM and obesity, and may act as a harbinger for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in this high-risk population. In addition to male hypogonadism and macrovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction is central to the connection between the metabolic syndrome and ED. Conversely, improved glycemic control and weight loss have been found to improve erectile function.Conclusion: ED is very prevalent in men with DM and obesity. It is increasingly being recognized as an early clinical indicator and motivator for patients with CVD. The role of pharmacologic ED treatments in improving endothelial function is currently being investigated.     

Metabolic surgery: Quo Vadis?

The impact of bariatric surgery beyond its effect on weight loss has entailed a change in the way of regarding it. The term metabolic surgery has become more popular to designate those interventions that aim at resolving diseases that have been traditionally considered as of exclusive medical management, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Recommendations for metabolic surgery have been largely addressed and discussed in worldwide meetings, but no definitive consensus has been reached yet. Rates of diabetes remission after metabolic surgery have been one of the most debated hot topics, with heterogeneity being a current concern. This review aims to identify and clarify controversies regarding metabolic surgery, by focusing on a critical analysis of T2D remission rates achieved with different bariatric procedures, and using different criteria for its definition. Indications for metabolic surgery for patients with T2D who are not morbidly obese are also discussed.     

Bariatric Surgery Patients’ Views of Their Physicians’ Weight‐Related Attitudes and Practices

Objective: A prior study found that nearly 80% of bariatric surgery patients felt that they were treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession. This study assessed patient‐physician interactions in a group of bariatric surgery patients and in a group of less obese patients who sought weight loss by other means. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 105 bariatric surgery candidates (mean BMI, 54.8 kg/m²) and 214 applicants to a randomized controlled trial of the effects of behavior modification and sibutramine (mean BMI, 37.8 kg/m²) completed a questionnaire that assessed patient‐physician interactions concerning weight. Results: Only 13% of bariatric surgery patients reported that they were usually or always treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession, a percentage substantially lower than that found in the previous study. Surprisingly, surgery patients were significantly more satisfied than nonsurgery patients with the care they received for their obesity. Surgery patients also reported significantly more interactions with physicians concerning obesity and weight loss compared with nonsurgery patients. A substantial percentage of both groups, however, reported that their physician did not discuss weight control with them. Discussion: These and other findings suggest that doctor‐patient interactions concerning weight may have improved in the past decade; however, there is still much room for improvement. Increased efforts are needed to help physicians discuss, assess, and potentially treat obesity in primary care practice.     

Patient Perspectives on Obesity Management: Need for Greater Discussion of BMI and Weight-Loss Options Beyond Diet and Exercise,Especially in Patients With Diabetes

Objective: To identify perceptions of obesity management in patients with and without diabetes.Methods: A 48-question survey was administered in 2018 to our Endocrinology Clinic's adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m². Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare variables between groups.Results: Of 146 respondents, 105 had diabetes and 41 did not. Most respondents were female (61.4%), African American (66.4%), and with an income <$50,000 (58.6%). Those with diabetes had significantly greater comorbidities of hypertension, high cholesterol, and arthritis. Over 90% in both groups agreed that obesity is related to hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and early death. Only 48% were aware of their BMI, and only 30.5% with diabetes and 41.5% without diabetes perceived themselves to be obese. Over 60% in each group reported discussion of diet and exercise with their providers, whereas few in both groups reported referral to a formal weight-loss program (18.9%) or to a specialty that manages obesity (4.2%), or discussion of anti-obesity medications (11.2%) or bariatric surgery (8.4%). Reported concerns with anti-obesity medications and bariatric surgery included lack of knowledge and side effects or complications.Conclusion: These findings revealed excellent patient awareness of obesity as a health problem but misperception of obese status and unawareness of BMI. Presence of diabetes and other comorbidities did not result in greater discussion of weight-loss methods beyond diet and exercise. Increased patient education and discussion of specific weight-loss services, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery are needed.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; DM = diabetes mellitus; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HCP = healthcare provider