The endosymbiotic origin,diversification and fate of plastids

Plastids and mitochondria each arose from a single endosymbiotic event and share many similarities in how they were reduced and integrated with their host. However, the subsequent evolution of the two organelles could hardly be more different: mitochondria are a stable fixture of eukaryotic cells that are neither lost nor shuffled between lineages, whereas plastid evolution has been a complex mix of movement, loss and replacement. Molecular data from the past decade have substantially untangled this complex history, and we now know that plastids are derived from a single endosymbiotic event in the ancestor of glaucophytes, red algae and green algae (including plants). The plastids of both red algae and green algae were subsequently transferred to other lineages by secondary endosymbiosis. Green algal plastids were taken up by euglenids and chlorarachniophytes, as well as one small group of dinoflagellates. Red algae appear to have been taken up only once, giving rise to a diverse group called chromalveolates. Additional layers of complexity come from plastid loss, which has happened at least once and probably many times, and replacement. Plastid loss is difficult to prove, and cryptic, non-photosynthetic plastids are being found in many non-photosynthetic lineages. In other cases, photosynthetic lineages are now understood to have evolved from ancestors with a plastid of different origin, so an ancestral plastid has been replaced with a new one. Such replacement has taken place in several dinoflagellates (by tertiary endosymbiosis with other chromalveolates or serial secondary endosymbiosis with a green alga), and apparently also in two rhizarian lineages: chlorarachniophytes and Paulinella (which appear to have evolved from chromalveolate ancestors). The many twists and turns of plastid evolution each represent major evolutionary transitions, and each offers a glimpse into how genomes evolve and how cells integrate through gene transfers and protein trafficking.     

Plastid genome sequence of the cryptophyte alga Rhodomonas salina CCMP1319: lateral transfer of putative DNA replication machinery and a test of chromist plastid phylogeny

Cryptophytes are a group of unicellular algae with chlorophyll c-containing plastids derived from the uptake of a secondary (i.e., eukaryotic) endosymbiont. Biochemical and molecular data indicate that cryptophyte plastids are derived from red algae, yet the question of whether or not cryptophytes acquired their red algal plastids independent of those in heterokont, haptophyte, and dinoflagellate algae is of long-standing debate. To better understand the origin and evolution of the cryptophyte plastid, we have sequenced the plastid genome of Rhodomonas salina CCMP1319: at 135,854 bp, it is the largest secondary plastid genome characterized thus far. It also possesses interesting features not seen in the distantly related cryptophyte Guillardia theta or in other red secondary plastids, including pseudogenes, introns, and a bacterial-derived gene for the tau/gamma subunit of DNA polymerase III (dnaX), the first time putative DNA replication machinery has been found encoded in any plastid genome. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that dnaX was acquired by lateral gene transfer (LGT) in an ancestor of Rhodomonas, most likely from a firmicute bacterium. A phylogenomic survey revealed no additional cases of LGT, beyond a noncyanobacterial type rpl36 gene similar to that recently characterized in other cryptophytes and haptophytes. Rigorous concatenated analysis of 45 proteins encoded in 15 complete plastid genomes produced trees in which the heterokont, haptophyte, and cryptophyte (i.e., chromist) plastids were monophyletic, and heterokonts and haptophytes were each other's closest relatives. However, statistical support for chromist monophyly disappears when amino acids are recoded according to their chemical properties in order to minimize the impact of composition bias, and a significant fraction of the concatenate appears consistent with a sister-group relationship between cryptophyte and haptophyte plastids.     

Is Protein Import into Plastids with Four‐Membrane Envelopes Dependent on Two Toc Systems Operating in Tandem?

Abstract: Plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by several independent endosymbioses involving a eukaryotic alga as the endosymbiont and a protozoan predator as the host. It is assumed that their outermost membrane is derived from the phagosomal membrane of the host and that protein targeting to and across this membrane proceeds co‐translationally, including ER and the Golgi apparatus (e.g., chlorarachniophytes) or only ER (e.g., heterokonts). Since the two inner membranes (or the plastid envelope) of such a complex plastid are derived from the endosymbiont plastid, they are probably provided with Toc and Tic systems, enabling post‐translational passage of the imported proteins into the stroma. The third envelope membrane, or the periplastid one, originates from the endosymbiont plasmalemma, but what import apparatus operates in it remains enigmatic. Recently, Cavalier‐Smith (1999^[5]) has proposed that the Toc system, pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid, has been relocated to the periplastid membrane, and that plastids having four envelope membranes contain two Toc systems operating in tandem and requiring the same targeting sequence, i.e., the transit peptide. Although this model is parsimonious, it encounters several serious obstacles, the most serious one resulting from the complex biogenesis of Toc75 which forms a translocation pore. In contrast to most proteins targeted to the outer membrane of the plastid envelope, this protein carries a complex transit peptide, indicating that a successful integration of the Toc system into the periplastid membrane would have to be accompanied by relocation of the stromal processing peptidase to the endosymbiont cytosol. However, such a relocation would be catastrophic because this enzyme would cleave the transit peptide off all plastid‐destined proteins, thus disabling biogenesis of the plastid compartment. Considering these difficulties, I suggest that in periplastid membranes two Toc‐independent translocation apparatuses have evolved: a porin‐like channel in chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes, and a vesicular pathway in heterokonts and haptophytes. Since simultaneous evolution of a new transport system in the periplastid membrane and in the phagosomal one would be complicated, it is argued that plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by replacement of plastids with three‐membrane envelopes. I suggest that during the first round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by three membranes), myzocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga developed a Golgi‐mediated targeting pathway which was added to the Toc/Tic‐based apparatus of the endosymbiont plastid. During the second round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by four membranes), phagocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga exploited the Golgi pathway of the original plastid, and a new translocation system had to originate only in the periplastid membrane, although its emergence probably resulted in modification of the import machinery pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid.     

Glycoprotein import: A common feature of complex plastids?

Complex plastids evolved by secondary endosymbiosis and are, in contrast to primary plastids, surrounded by 3 or 4 envelope membranes. Recently, we provided evidence that in diatoms proteins exist that get N-glycosylated during transport across the outermost membrane of the complex plastid. This gives rise to unique questions on the transport mechanisms of these bulky proteins, which get transported across up to 3 further membranes into the plastid stroma. Here we discuss our results in an evolutionary context and speculate about the existence of plastidal glycoproteins in other organisms with complex plastids.     

A Genomic and Phylogenetic Perspective on Endosymbiosis and Algal Origin

Accounting for the diversity of photosynthetic eukaryotes is an important challenge in microbial biology. It has now become clear that endosymbiosis explains the origin of the photosynthetic organelle (plastid) in different algal groups. The first plastid originated from a primary endosymbiosis, whereby a previously non-photosynthetic protist engulfed and enslaved a cyanobacterium. This alga then gave rise to the red, green, and glaucophyte lineages. Algae such as the chlorophyll c-containing chromists gained their plastid through secondary endosymbiosis, in which an existing eukaryotic alga (in this case, a rhodophyte) was engulfed. Another chlorophyll c-containing algal group, the dinoflagellates, is a member of the alveolates that is postulated to be sister to chromists. The plastid in these algae has followed a radically different path of evolution. The peridinin-containing dinoflagellates underwent an unprecedented level of plastid genome reduction with the ca. 16 remaining genes encoded on 1–3 gene minicircles. In this short review, we examine algal plastid diversity using phylogenetic and genomic methods and show endosymbiosis to be a major force in algal evolution. In particular, we focus on the evolution of targeting signals that facilitate the import of nuclear-encoded photosynthetic proteins into the plastid.     

A Phylogenetic Assessment of the Eukaryotic Light-Harvesting Antenna Proteins, with Implications for Plastid Evolution

The light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) are a superfamily of chlorophyll-binding proteins present in all photosynthetic eukaryotes. The Lhc genes are nuclear-encoded, yet the pigment–protein complexes are localized to the thylakoid membrane and provide a marker to follow the evolutionary paths of plastids with different pigmentation. The LHCs are divided into the chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins of the green algae, euglenoids, and higher plants and the chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins of various algal taxa. This work examines the phylogenetic position of the LHCs from three additional taxa: the rhodophytes, the cryptophytes, and the chlorarachniophytes. Phylogenetic analysis of the LHC sequences provides strong statistical support for the clustering of the rhodophyte and cryptomonad LHC sequences within the chlorophyll a/c-binding protein lineage, which includes the fucoxanthin–chlorophyll proteins (FCP) of the heterokonts and the intrinsic peridinin–chlorophyll proteins (iPCP) of the dinoflagellates. These associations suggest that plastids from the heterokonts, haptophytes, cryptomonads, and the dinoflagellate, Amphidinium, evolved from a red algal-like ancestor. The Chlorarachnion LHC is part of the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein assemblage, consistent with pigmentation, providing further evidence that its plastid evolved from a green algal secondary endosymbiosis. The Chlorarachnion LHC sequences cluster with the green algal LHCs that are predominantly associated with photosystem II (LHCII). This suggests that the green algal endosymbiont that evolved into the Chlorarachnion plastid was acquired following the emergence of distinct LHCI and LHCII complexes. Received: 25 February 1998 / Accepted: 13 May 1998     

Molecular evidence for plastid robbery (Kleptoplastidy) in Dinophysis,a dinoflagellate causing diarrhetic shellfish poisoning

The dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis contains species known to cause diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Although most photosynthetic dinoflagellates have plastids with peridinin, photosynthetic Dinophysis species have cryptophyte-like plastids containing phycobilin rather than peridinin. We sequenced nuclear- and plastid-encoded SSU rDNA from three photosynthetic species of Dinophysis for phylogenetic analyses. In the tree of nuclear SSU rDNA, Dinophysis was a monophyletic group nested with peridinin-containing dinoflagellates. However, in the tree of plastid SSU rDNA, the Dinophysis plastid lineage was within the radiation of cryptophytes and was closely related to Geminigera cryophila. These analyses indicate that an ancestor of Dinophysis, which may have originally possessed peridinin-type plastid and lost it subsequently, adopted a new plastid from a cryptophyte. Unlike dinoflagellates with fully integrated plastids, the Dinophysis plastid SSU rDNA sequences were identical among the three species examined, while there were species-specific base substitutions in their nuclear SSU rDNA sequences. Queries of the DNA database showed that the plastid SSU rDNA sequence of Dinophysis is almost identical to that of an environmental DNA clone of a <10 pm sized plankter, possibly a cryptophyte and a likely source of the Dinophysis plastid. The present findings suggest that these Dinophysis species engulfed and temporarily retained plastids from a cryptophyte.     

Eukaryote-eukaryote endosymbioses: insights from studies of a cryptomonad alga.

It has been proposed that those plants which contain photosynthetic plastids surrounded by more than two membranes have arisen through secondary endosymbiotic events. Molecular evidence confirms this proposal, but the nature of the endosymbiont(s) and the number of endosymbioses remain unresolved. Whether plastids arose from one type of prokaryotic ancestor or multiple types is the subject of some controversy. In order to try to resolve this question, the plastid gene content and arrangement has been studied from a cryptomonad alga. Most of the gene clusters common to photosynthetic prokaryotes and plastids are preserved and seventeen genes which are not found on the plastid genomes of land plants have been found. Together with previously published phylogenetic analyses of plastid genes, the present data support the notion that the type of prokaryote involved in the initial endosymbiosis was from within the cyanobacterial assemblage and that an early divergence giving rise to the green plant lineage and the rhodophyte lineage resulted in the differences in plastid gene content and sequence between these two groups. Multiple secondary endosymbiotic events involving a eukaryotic (probably rhodophytic alga) and different hosts are hypothesized to have occurred subsequently, giving rise to the chromophyte, cryptophyte and euglenophyte lineages.     

DO PLASTID‐RELATED CHARACTERS SUPPORT THE CHROMALVEOLATE HYPOTHESIS?1

According to the idea of secondary endosymbiosis, plastids with three and four envelope membranes have evolved from either red or green algal endosymbionts engulfed by phagotrophic protozoans. Although this hypothesis is nowadays commonly accepted, the number of secondary endosymbioses still remains controversial. One of the models, known as the ”chromalveolate” hypothesis, postulates that the 4 membrane‐bound plastids of Chromista and the 3 or 4 membrane‐bound plastids of Alveolata result from a single secondary endosymbiosis involving a rhodophyte as the endosymbiont. Although this model has found many followers, a variety of data clearly contradict it. The ideas that became the direct inspiration for formulation of the “chromalveolate” hypothesis are also now questionable. In this comment, I discuss all these problems in the light of the most recent phylogenetic, cytological, and genomic data.     

Protein targeting into plastids: a key to understanding the symbiogenetic acquisitions of plastids

Recent progress in molecular phylogenetics has proven that photosynthetic eukaryotes acquired plastids via primary and secondary endosymbiosis and has given us information about the origin of each plastid. How a photosynthetic endosymbiont became a plastid in each group is, however, poorly understood, especially for the organisms with secondary plastids. Investigating how a nuclear-encoded plastid protein is targeted into a plastid in each photosynthetic group is one of the most important keys to understanding the evolutionary process of symbiogenetic plastid acquisition and its diversity. For organisms which originated through primary endosymbiosis, protein targeting into plastids has been well studied at the molecular level. For organisms which originated through secondary endosymbiosis, molecular-level studies have just started on the plastid-targeted protein-precursor sequences and the targeting pathways of the precursors. However, little information is available about how the proteins get across the inner two or three envelope membranes in organisms with secondary plastids. A good in vitro protein-import system for isolated plastids and a cell transformation system must be established for each group of photosynthetic eukaryotes in order to understand the mechanisms, the evolutionary processes and the diversity of symbiogenetic plastid acquisitions in photosynthetic eukaryotes.     

Multiple genes of apparent algal origin suggest ciliates may once have been photosynthetic

Plantae (as defined by Cavalier-Smith, 1981) plastids evolved via primary endosymbiosis whereby a heterotrophic protist enslaved a photosynthetic cyanobacterium. This "primary" plastid spread into other eukaryotes via secondary endosymbiosis. An important but contentious theory in algal evolution is the chromalveolate hypothesis that posits chromists (cryptophytes, haptophytes, and stramenopiles) and alveolates (ciliates, apicomplexans, and dinoflagellates) share a common ancestor that contained a red-algal-derived "secondary" plastid. Under this view, the existence of several later-diverging plastid-lacking chromalveolates such as ciliates and oomycetes would be explained by plastid loss in these lineages. To test the idea of a photosynthetic ancestry for ciliates, we used the 27,446 predicted proteins from the macronuclear genome of Tetrahymena thermophila to query prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. We identified 16 proteins of possible algal origin in the ciliates Tetrahymena and Paramecium tetraurelia. Fourteen of these are present in other chromalveolates. Here we compare and contrast the likely scenarios for algal-gene origin in ciliates either via multiple rounds of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from algal prey or symbionts, or through endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT) during a putative photosynthetic phase in their evolution.     

A tertiary plastid uses genes from two endosymbionts

The origin and subsequent spread of plastids by endosymbiosis had a major environmental impact and altered the course of a great proportion of eukaryotic biodiversity. The ancestor of dinoflagellates contained a secondary plastid that was acquired in an ancient endosymbiotic event, where a eukaryotic cell engulfed a red alga. This is known as secondary endosymbiosis and has happened several times in eukaryotic evolution. Certain dinoflagellates, however, are unique in having replaced this secondary plastid in an additional (tertiary) round of endosymbiosis. Most plastid proteins are encoded in the nucleus of the host and are targeted to the organelle. When secondary or tertiary endosymbiosis takes place, it is thought that these genes move from nucleus to nucleus, so the plastid retains the same proteome. We have conducted large-scale expressed sequence tag (EST) surveys from Karlodinium micrum, a dinoflagellate with a tertiary haptophyte-derived plastid, and two haptophytes, Isochrysis galbana and Pavlova lutheri. We have identified all plastid-targeted proteins, analysed the phylogenetic origin of each protein, and compared their plastid-targeting transit peptides. Many plastid-targeted genes in the Karlodinium nucleus are indeed of haptophyte origin, but some genes were also retained from the original plastid (showing the two plastids likely co-existed in the same cell), in other cases multiple isoforms of different origins exist. We analysed plastid-targeting sequences and found the transit peptides in K.micrum are different from those found in either dinoflagellates or haptophytes, pointing to a plastid with an evolutionarily chimeric proteome, and a massive remodelling of protein trafficking during plastid replacement.     

Chloroplast envelope membranes: a dynamic interface between plastids and the cytosol

Chloroplasts are bounded by a pair of outer membranes, the envelope, that is the only permanent membrane structure of the different types of plastids. Chloroplasts have had a long and complex evolutionary past and integration of the envelope membranes in cellular functions is the result of this evolution. Plastid envelope membranes contain a wide diversity of lipids and terpenoid compounds serving numerous biochemical functions and the flexibility of their biosynthetic pathways allow plants to adapt to fluctuating environmental conditions (for instance phosphate deprivation). A large body of knowledge has been generated by proteomic studies targeted to envelope membranes, thus revealing an unexpected complexity of this membrane system. For instance, new transport systems for metabolites and ions have been identified in envelope membranes and new routes for the import of chloroplast-specific proteins have been identified. The picture emerging from our present understanding of plastid envelope membranes is that of a key player in plastid biogenesis and the co-ordinated gene expression of plastid-specific protein (owing to chlorophyll precursors), of a major hub for integration of metabolic and ionic networks in cell metabolism, of a flexible system that can divide, produce dynamic extensions and interact with other cell constituents. Envelope membranes are indeed one of the most complex and dynamic system within a plant cell. In this review, we present an overview of envelope constituents together with recent insights into the major functions fulfilled by envelope membranes and their dynamics within plant cells. Special Issue of Photosynthesis Research in honor of Andrew A. Benson.     

Phylogeny of Plastids Based on Cladistic Analysis of Gene Loss Inferred from Complete Plastid Genome Sequences

Based on the recent hypothesis on the origin of eukaryotic phototrophs, red algae, green plants, and glaucophytes constitute the primary photosynthetic eukaryotes (whose plastids may have originated directly from a cyanobacterium-like prokaryote via primary endosymbiosis), whereas the plastids of other lineages of eukaryotic phototrophs appear to be the result of secondary or tertiary endosymbiotic events (involving a phototrophic eukaryote and a host cell). Although phylogenetic analyses using multiple plastid genes from a wide range of eukaryotic lineages have been carried out, some of the major phylogenetic relationships of plastids remain ambiguous or conflict between different phylogenetic methods used for nucleotide or amino acid substitutions. Therefore, an alternative methodology to infer the plastid phylogeny is needed. Here, we carried out a cladistic analysis of the loss of plastid genes after primary endosymbiosis using complete plastid genome sequences from a wide range of eukaryotic phototrophs. Since it is extremely unlikely that plastid genes are regained during plastid evolution, we used the irreversible Camin-Sokal model for our cladistic analysis of the loss of plastid genes. The cladistic analysis of the 274 plastid protein-coding genes resolved the 20 operational taxonomic units representing a wide range of eukaryotic lineages (including three secondary plastid-containing groups) into two large monophyletic groups with high bootstrap values: one corresponded to the red lineage and the other consisted of a large clade composed of the green lineage (green plants and Euglena) and the basal glaucophyte plastid. Although the sister relationship between the green lineage and the Glaucophyta was not resolved in recent phylogenetic studies using amino acid substitutions from multiple plastid genes, it is consistent with the rbcL gene phylogeny and with a recent phylogenetic study using multiple nuclear genes. In addition, our analysis robustly resolved the conflicting/ambiguous phylogenetic positions of secondary plastids in previous phylogenetic studies: the Euglena plastid was sister to the chlorophycean (Chlamydomonas) lineage, and the secondary plastids from the diatom (Odontiella) and cryptophyte (Guillardia) were monophyletic within the red lineage.     

Mechanism of Protein Targeting to the Chlorarachniophyte Plastids and the Evolution of Complex Plastids with Four Membranes — A Hypothesis

Chlorarachniophyta are phototrophic amoeboflagellates, with plastids surrounded by four membranes. Contrary to other plastids of this type which occur in chromists, their outermost membrane bears no ribosomes. It is argued that the nuclear-encoded chlorarachniophyte plastid proteins are first transported into the ER, then to the Colgi apparatus, and finally to the plastids. The same import mechanism could be originally present in the chromist ancestor, prior to the fusion of their plastids with the RER membranes. According to the most recent concept, the complex plastids of Chromista and Chlorarachniophyta have evolved through replacement of the cyanobacterial plastids. The assumption that these plastids had an envelope composed not of two, but of three membranes makes it possible to avoid the erlier discerned difficulties with conversion of a eukaryotic alga into a complex plastid. My scenario provides an additional support to the hypothesis on polyphy-letic origin of four-membraned plastids.     

Three old and one new: protein import into red algal-derived plastids surrounded by four membranes

Engulfment of a red or green alga by another eukaryote and subsequent reduction of the symbiont to an organelle, termed a complex plastid, is a process known as secondary endosymbiosis and is shown in a diverse group of eukaryotic organisms. Important members are heterokontophytes, haptophytes, cryptophytes, and apicomplexan parasites, all of them with complex plastids of red algal origin surrounded by four membranes. Although the evolutionary relationship between these organisms is still debated, they share common mechanisms for plastid protein import. In this review, we describe recent findings and current models on preprotein import into complex plastids with a special focus on the second outermost plastid membrane. Derived from the plasma membrane of the former endosymbiont, the evolution of protein transport across this so-called periplastidal membrane most likely represented the challenge in the transition from an endosymbiont to a host-dependent organelle. Here, remodeling and relocation of the symbiont endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) machinery gave rise to a translocon complex termed symbiont-specific ERAD-like machinery and provides a fascinating insight into complex cellular evolution.     

Selective feeding and foreign plastid retention in an Antarctic dinoflagellate

The peridinin‐containing plastid found in most photosynthetic dinoflagellates is thought to have been replaced in a few lineages by plastids of chlorophyte, diatom, or haptophyte origin. Other distinct lineages of phagotrophic dinoflagellates retain functional plastids obtained from algal prey for different durations and with varying source species specificity. 18S rRNA gene sequence analyses have placed a novel gymnodinoid dinoflagellate isolated from the Ross Sea (RSD) in the Kareniaceae, a family of dinoflagellates with permanent plastids of haptophyte origin. In contrast to other species in this family, the RSD contains kleptoplastids sequestered from its prey, Phaeocystis antarctica. Culture experiments were employed to determine whether the RSD fed selectively on P. antarctica when offered in combination with another polar haptophyte or cryptophyte species, and whether the RSD, isolated from its prey and starved, would take up plastids from P. antarctica or from other polar haptophyte or cryptophyte species. Evidence was obtained for selective feeding on P. antarctica, plastid uptake from P. antarctica, and increased RSD growth in the presence of P. antarctica. The presence of a peduncle‐like structure in the RSD suggests that kleptoplasts are obtained by myzocytosis. RSD cells incubated without P. antarctica were capable of survival for at least 29.5 months. This remarkable longevity of the RSD's kleptoplasts and its species specificity for prey and plastid source is consistent with its prolonged co‐evolution with P. antarctica. It may also reflect the presence of a plastid protein import mechanism and genes transferred to the dinokaryon from a lost permanent haptophyte plastid.     

Review

Most photosynthetic dinoflagellates harbour the peridinin plastid. This plastid is surrounded by three membranes and its characteristic pigments are chlorophyll c and the carotenoid peridinin. The evolutionary origin of this peculiar plastid remains controversial and is hotly debated. On the recently published tree of concatenated plastid-encoded proteins, dinoflagellates emerge from within the Chromista (clade containing cryptophytes, heterokonts, and haptophytes) and cluster specifically with Heterokonta. These data inspired a new version of the ‘chromalveolate’ model, according to which the peridinin plastid evolved by ‘descent with modification’ from a heterokont-like plastid that had been acquired from a rhodophyte by an ancestral chromalveolate. However, this model of plastid evolution encounters serious obstacles. Firstly, the heterokont plastid is surrounded by four membranes, which means that the ancestral peridinin plastid must have lost one of these primary membranes. However, such a loss could be traumatic, because it could potentially disturb protein import into and/or within the plastid. Secondly, on the phylogenetic tree of Dinoflagellata and Heterokonta, the first to diverge are not plastid, but heterotrophic, aplastidal taxa. Thus, when accepting the single origin of the heterokont and peridinin plastids, we would have to postulate multiple plastid losses, but such a scenario is highly doubtful when the numerous non-photosynthetic functions of plastids and their existence in heterotrophic protists, including parasitic lineages, are considered. Taking these obstacles into account, we suggest an alternative interpretation of the concatenated tree of plastid-encoded proteins. According to our hypothesis, the peridinin plastid evolved from a heterokont alga through tertiary endosymbiosis.     

New mechanistic insights into pre‐protein transport across the second outermost plastid membrane of diatoms

Chromalveolates like the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum arose through the uptake of a red alga by a phagotrophic protist, a process termed secondary endosymbiosis. In consequence, the plastids are surrounded by two additional membranes compared with primary plastids. This plastid morphology poses additional barriers for plastid‐destined proteins, which are mostly nucleus‐encoded. Recent investigations have focused on the postulated translocon of the second outermost membrane (periplastidal membrane, PPM). These studies identified a symbiont‐specific ERAD (endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation)‐like machinery (SELMA), which has been implicated in plastid pre‐protein import. Despite this recent progress, key factors for protein transport via SELMA are still unknown. As SELMA substrates presumably undergo ubiquitination, a corresponding ubiquitin ligase and an enzyme for the subsequent removal of ubiquitin need to reside in the space between the second and third membrane (periplastidal compartment, PPC). Here we characterize two proteins fulfilling these criteria. We show that ptE3P (P. t ricornutumE3 enzyme of the P PC), the ubiquitin ligase, and ptDUP (P. t ricornutumd e‐u biquitinating enzyme of the P PC), the de‐ubiquitinase, localize to the PPM and PPC, respectively. In addition, we demonstrate their retained functionality by in vitro data.