Resuscitation from cardiac arrest: assessment of a system providing only basic life support outside of hospital

Resuscitation outside of hospital of victims of cardiac arrest is a major challenge to our emergency care system. Most cities in Canada do not have a mobile advanced life support service; instead they rely on basic life support outside of hospital. The outcome in such cases and the factors affecting the outcome are largely unknown. Thus, it is difficult to estimate the lifesaving potential of adding advanced life support to the existing measures available for care outside of hospital.A prospective study of all resuscitation attempts begun outside of hospital was conducted during 18 consecutive months in 1977-78 in Winnipeg; at that time only basic life support was available outside of hospital. Resuscitation was attempted 849 times, and 33 patients (4%) survived to be discharged from hospital. Data analysis revealed that: (a) none of the 58% of patients in asystole at the time of arrival at a hospital survived to be discharged, but 11% of the patients with ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (27% of the entire group) survived; (b) the survival rate was lower when the interval from the emergency telephone call to the patient''s arrival at the hospital exceeded 10 minutes; and (c) basic life support was begun immediately in 29% of the patients with ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, and increased the survival rate fivefold.The training of private citizens in basic life support is a vital component of total emergency cardiac care. A mobile advanced life support service will be effective in saving lives if it reduces the delay before definitive care is instituted, preferably to less than 10 minutes.     

Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS Study): methods and overall results.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the circumstances, incidence, and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in British hospitals. DESIGN--Hospitals registered all cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts for 12 months or longer and followed survival to one year. SETTING--12 metropolitan, provincial, teaching, and non-teaching hospitals across Britain. SUBJECTS--3765 patients in whom a resuscitation attempt was performed, including 927 in whom the onset of arrest was outside the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Survival after initial resuscitation, at 24 hours, at discharge from hospital, and at one year, calculated by the life table method. RESULTS--There were 417 known survivors at one year, with 214 lost to follow up. By life table analysis for every eight attempted resuscitations there were three immediate survivors, two at 24 hours, 1.5 leaving hospital alive, and one alive at one year. Survival at one year was 12.5% including out of hospital cases and 15.0% not including these cases. Each hospital year averaged 30 survivors at one year: three who had an arrest outside hospital, seven who had one in the accident and emergency department, seven in the cardiac care unit, 10 in the general wards, and three in other, non-ward areas. Within the hospitals survival rates were best in those who had an arrest in the accident and emergency department, the cardiac care unit, or other specialised units. Outcome varied 12-fold in subgroups defined by age, type of arrest, and place of arrest. CONCLUSION--71% of the mortality at one year in patients undergoing attempted resuscitation occurred during the initial arrest. Hospital resuscitation is life saving and cost effective and warrants appropriate attention, training, coordination, and equipment.     

Appraisal of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Sixty-six patients more than 30 days and less thant 16 years of age suffering an unexpected cardiac arrest in an 18-month period were included in a study of resuscitative measures in children. Six children survived to be discharged from hospital. Respiratory disease accounted for most (29%) of the cardiac arrests, but it also had the most favourable prognosis, 21% of the 19 patients surviving. None of the patients survived whose cardiac arrest was secondary to sepsis or trauma, even when the resuscitative efforts were initially successful. Only 1 of the 41 patients who had a cardiac arrest outside of hospital survived, and only 1 of the 34 patients who presented with asystole survived, and then with considerable damage to the central nervous system. The interval between cardiac arrest and application of basic life support was substantially shorter among the survivors. Also, most of the survivors did not present with asystole. The results of this study suggest that survival among resuscitated children is no better than that among adults but can be improved with early recognition and monitoring of children at risk. earlier application of basic and advanced life support, improved education of medical and lay personnel, and further research into pediatric resuscitative techniques.     

Resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest by ambulance staff with extended training in West Yorkshire.

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the results of resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest by ambulance staff with extended training in West Yorkshire. DESIGN--Study of all such attempts at resuscitation over 32 months, based on the standard report form for each call made by the ambulance staff and the electrocardiogram that showed the initial rhythm in each patient. SETTING--Area covered by West Yorkshire ambulance service. SUBJECTS--1196 Patients with cardiac arrests attended by 29 ambulance staff with extended training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Result of resuscitation. RESULTS--The initial rhythm was asystole or electromechanical dissociation in 740 patients and ventricular fibrillation in 456 patients; overall 65 patients survived to be discharged from hospital. Sixty four of the 456 patients in whom ventricular fibrillation was the initial rhythm recorded, and 46 in whom ventricular fibrillation persisted after the ambulance staff arrived, survived. Only one of the 740 patients who initially had asystole or electromechanical dissociation survived. Factors associated with a greater chance of ventricular fibrillation occurring were: age less than 71, the arrest being witnessed by a bystander, resuscitation by a bystander, the arrest occurring in a public place, and a response time by the ambulance staff of less than six minutes. For patients found in ventricular fibrillation a shorter response time was associated with improved survival but resuscitation by a bystander was not. Additional skills learnt during extended training were used for 51 of the 65 patients who survived. CONCLUSIONS--Ambulance staff with extended training can save the lives of patients with cardiac arrest due to fibrillation, though asystole and electromechanical dissociation have a poor prognosis and should perhaps receive little attention during extended training.     

Hospital resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in Brighton.

The overall results over three and a half years of the treatment of ventricular fibrillation secondary to ischaemic heart disease in the Royal Sussex County Hospital were reviewed. Records of all patients who were brought to hospital by resuscitation ambulances or who were admitted to the coronary care unit from any source were analysed. Eighty-seven of the 174 patients (50%) who developed ventricular fibrillation were discharged. The survivors included 13 out of 61 patients (21%) in whom fibrillation was secondary to cardiogenic shock or severe left ventricular failure. The presence of resuscitation equipment and nursing staff trained to use it in the general wards and emergency areas ensured a uniformly high success rate throughout the hospital, similar to that achieved in the coronary care unit. Prompt defibrillation in the general wards and the accident and emergency department may improve overall survival.     

Smoking and lung cancer

The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a vital aspect of health care delivery in hospital was the basis for a ten-year study. All instances of cardiac arrest occurring outside the operating room and nursery were included.Variations in degrees of success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as related to the duration of the program, differences among varying subsets such as patients'' type of illness and hospital location (emergency room, coronary care unit, intensive care unit or nursing floor) at the time of cardiopulmonary arrest, are presented. The relationship between cardiopulmonary resuscitation frequency and success with increasing instrumentation is reviewed. A simple technique for expressing effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on hospital mortality is presented.The study shows the ability of a community hospital to establish, maintain and document a high level cardiopulmonary resuscitation program.     

Predictors of survival after cardiac or respiratory arrest in critical care units

Background:

Survival outcomes after cardiac or respiratory arrest occurring outside of intensive care units (ICUs) has been well described. We investigated survival outcomes of adults whose arrest occurred in ICUs and determined predictors of decreased survival.

Methods:

We reviewed all records of adults who experienced cardiac or respiratory arrest from Jan. 1, 2000, to Apr. 30, 2005, in ICUs at four hospitals serving Edmonton, Alberta. We evaluated patient and clinical characteristics, as well as survival outcomes during a five-year follow-up period. We determined risk factors for immediate (within 24 hours) and later death.

Results:

Of the 517 patients included in the study, 59.6% were able to be resuscitated, 30.4% survived to discharge from ICU, 26.9% survived to discharge from hospital, 24.3% survived to one year, and 15.9% survived to five years. Pulseless electrical activity or asystole was the most common rhythm (45.8% of the arrests). Survival was lowest among patients with an arrest due to pulseless electrical activity or asystole: only 10.6% survived to one year, compared with 36.3% who had other arrest rhythms (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of decreased later survival (eight months or more after arrest) were increasing age (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.09) and longer duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03–1.83, per additional logarithm of a minute of CPR).

Interpretation:

Our study showed no major improvement in survival following cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity or asystole as the presenting rhythm in the ICU despite many advances in critical care over the previous two decades. The independent predictors of death within 24 hours after arrest in an ICU were sex, the presenting rhythm and the duration of CPR. Predictors of later death (eight months or more after arrest) were age and duration of CPR.Cardiac arrest remains a major clinical and public health problem.¹ Studies of cardiac arrest involving patients admitted to non-critical care beds showed that survival has not improved despite 40 years of medical advances.^2–4 Outside of critical care units, survival was substantially lower for nonwitnessed arrests than for witnessed arrests; for cardiac than for respiratory arrests; for arrests due to asystole or pulseless electrical activity than for those due to ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia; and for arrests occurring early in the morning than for those at other times of the day.^2–4 How these data apply to approximately one-third of in-hospital cardiac arrests that occur in intensive care units (ICUs) is less clear.Arrests in ICUs might be expected to have increased survival because universal cardiac monitoring and a high nurse-to-patient ratio would mean that the arrests would be witnessed regardless of the time of day. On the other hand, survival might be expected to be lower because critical care patients have a high disease burden and experience arrests despite aggressive preemptive life support. Also, patients in a general ICU might be expected to have poorer survival than those in a coronary care or cardiovascular surgical ICU because they typically have primary noncardiac diagnoses; therefore, cardiac arrest in these patients implies cardiovascular collapse in addition to noncardiac illness (i.e., at least two-organ failure).^3,4We evaluated survival outcomes during a five-year follow-up period among adult patients who experienced cardiac or respiratory arrest in ICUs at four hospitals. We also identified risk factors associated with decreased survival after 24 hours.     

Quality Improvement Report: Six year audit of cardiac arrests and medical emergency team calls in an Australian outer metropolitan teaching hospital

Problem In-hospital cardiac arrest often represents failure of optimal clinical care. The use of medical emergency teams to prevent such events is controversial. In-hospital cardiac arrests have been reduced in several single centre historical control studies, but the only randomised prospective study showed no such benefit. In our hospital an important problem was failure to call the medical emergency team or cardiac arrest team when, before in-hospital cardiac arrest, patients had fulfilled the criteria for calling the team.Design Single centre, prospective audit of cardiac arrests and data on use of the medical emergency team during 2000 to 2005.Setting 400 bed general outer suburban metropolitan teaching hospital.Strategies for change Three initiatives in the hospital to improve use of the medical emergency team: orientation programme for first year doctors, professional development course for medical registrars, and the evolving role of liaison intensive care unit nurses.Key measures for improvement Incidence of cardiac arrests.Effects of the change Incidence of cardiac arrests decreased 24% per year, from 2.4/1000 admissions in 2000 to 0.66/1000 admissions in 2005.Lessons learnt Medical emergency teams can be efficacious when supported with a multidisciplinary, multifaceted education system for clinical staff.     

One thousand heart attacks in Grampian: the place of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in general practice.

The outcome of 1011 heart attacks in patients under the care of general practitioners who practised cardiopulmonary resuscitation and were equipped with defibrillators is reported. The 28 day mortality was 36% (367 patients), and 59% of deaths occurred outside hospital. The general practitioner was the first medical contact in 92% of heart attacks and was equipped with a defibrillator in 80% of such calls. Fifty six patients had a cardiac arrest in the presence of a general practitioner, and resuscitation was attempted in 47 cases, representing 5% of all calls for heart attacks. Twenty one (45%) resuscitated patients reached hospital alive, and 13 (28%) survived to leave hospital. The opportunities for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in general practice occur sufficiently often to warrant training and equipping general practitioners for advanced life support. The results of resuscitation by general practitioners working alone compare favourably with those of mobile coronary care units based in hospitals.     

High survival rate of 43% in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an optimised chain of survival

Aims

Survival to hospital discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies widely. This study describes short-term survival after OHCA in a region with an extensive care path and a follow-up of 1 year.

Methods

Consecutive patients ≥16 years admitted to the emergency department between April 2011 and December 2012 were included. In July 2014 a follow-up took place. Socio-demographic data, characteristics of the OHCA and interventions were described and associations with survival were determined.

Results

Two hundred forty-two patients were included (73 % male, median age 65 years). In 76 % the cardiac arrest was of cardiac origin and 52 % had a shockable rhythm. In 74 % the cardiac arrest was witnessed, 76 % received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in 39 % an automatic external defibrillator (AED) was used. Of the 168 hospitalised patients, 144 underwent therapeutic procedures. A total of 105 patients survived until hospital discharge. Younger age, cardiac arrest in public area, witnessed cardiac arrest, cardiac origin with a shockable rhythm, the use of an AED, shorter time until return of spontaneous circulation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥13 during transport and longer length of hospital stay were associated with survival. Of the 105 survivors 72 survived for at least 1 year after cardiac arrest and 6 patients died.

Conclusion

A survival rate of 43 % after OHCA is achievable. Witnessed cardiac arrest, cardiac cause of arrest, initial cardiac rhythm and GCS ≥13 were associated with higher survival.     

A community training scheme in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Community instruction in basic life support and resuscitation techniques has been offered in Brighton Health District since 1978. Classes are held frequently for the general public and businesses, schools, and other organisations. First aid care for unconscious patients, the treatment of respiratory obstruction or failure, and the recognition and management of cardiac arrest is taught in a single two hour session. Over 20 000 people have been taught, up to 40 at a time in multiple groups of six to eight, by lay instructors usually supervised by ambulancemen trained to "paramedic" standards. Fifty four incidents have been reported to us in which techniques learnt in the classes have been implemented. Five patients recovered after first aid support but subsequently did not seek medical treatment. Of the 34 patients reviewed in hospital, at least 20 survived to be discharged. We believe that intervention may have been life saving in 16 instances. The benefit of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for victims who may have been asystolic is, however, difficult to quantify because the outcome without intervention cannot be predicted accurately. Community training in basic life support should be considered in association with ambulances equipped for resuscitation and hospital intensive care and cardiac care units as an integrated service for the victims of sudden circulatory or respiratory emergencies. The results achieved so far in Brighton and in other more advanced schemes, particularly in the United States of America, may encourage other health authorities to adopt similar programmes.     

Survival of 1476 patients initially resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES--To determine the short and long term outcome of patients admitted to hospital after initially successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest out of hospital. DESIGN--Review of ambulance and hospital records. Follow up of mortality by "flagging" with the registrar general. Cox proportional hazards analysis of predictors of mortality in patients discharged alive from hospital. SETTING--Scottish Ambulance Service and acute hospitals throughout Scotland. SUBJECTS--1476 patients admitted to a hospital ward, of whom 680 (46%) were discharged alive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Survival to hospital discharge, neurological status at discharge, time to death, and cause of death after discharge. RESULTS--The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range 8-15) in patients discharged alive and 1 (1-4) day in those dying in hospital. Neurological status at discharge in survivors was normal or mildly impaired in 605 (89%), moderately impaired in 58 (8.5%), and severely impaired in 13 (2%); one patient was comatose. Direct discharge to home occurred in 622 (91%) cases. The 680 discharged survivors were followed up for a median of 25 (range 0-68) months. There were 176 deaths, of which 81 were sudden cardiac deaths, 55 were non-sudden cardiac deaths, and 40 were due to other causes. The product limit estimate of 4 year survival after discharge was 68%. The independent predictors of mortality on follow up were increased age, treatment for heart failure, and cardiac arrest not due to definite myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION--About 40% of initial survivors of resuscitation out of hospital are discharged home without major neurological disability. Patients at high risk of subsequent cardiac death can be identified and may benefit from further cardiological evaluation.     

Comparison of the effects of treatment of acute myocardial infarction in a coronary unit and on a general medical ward

During 1968, 400 cases of proven acute myocardial infarction were admitted to the Toronto General Hospital (mortality 25.0%).Approximately half the patients who survived their stay in the Emergency Department were admitted to the Coronary Unit (mortality 15.6%) while the other half, because of lack of beds in the Coronary Unit, were treated on a general medical ward (mortality 26.5%). More elderly patients (> 70) were admitted to the medical wards and contributed to the higher mortality.The frequency of successful resuscitation following cardiac arrest was twice as great in the Coronary Unit as on the medical wards. Antiarrhythmic drugs given in the Coronary Unit with the assistance of the electrocardiographic monitor did not influence the early mortality. Digitalis was used more frequently on the medical wards, but did not appear to exert an unfavourable effect on survival.     

Course of patients discharged early after myocardial infarction.

Two hundred and seventy-one (76%) out of 358 survivors of infarction were discharged by the eighth hospital day, and 251 (93%) of them survived to six weeks after discharge. Six of the 20 patients who died between discharge and six weeks did so after readmission and 14 died as outpatients. All these patients who died at home had transmural infarction and four had diabetes. In inpatients successful resuscitation occurred mainly within the first 48 hours, with only three successful long-term results from all the patients who suffered arrest later. This suggests that more prolonged inpatient care would not have reduced the late mortality. These figures justify continuing with an early discharge policy for most patients, but coronary care should probably be more prolonged for patients with diabetes.     

Long term follow up of severely ill patients who underwent urgent cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVE--To assess long term survival (> 5 years) and quality of life in severely ill patients referred for urgent cardiac transplantation. SETTING--Tertiary referral centres: before transplantation at the National Heart Hospital (late 1984 to end 1986); after transplantation at Harefield Hospital. SUBJECTS--Eighteen patients (15 men; three women) who had required intensive support in hospital before cardiac transplantation and were alive at short term follow up. INTERVENTIONS--Intravenous infusions of cardiac drugs (mean 2.2 infusions), intravenous diuretics (17 patients), and many other drugs before transplantation. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (four patients), temporary pacing (two), and resuscitation from cardiac arrest (three). Patients had specialised nursing care on a medical intensive care unit in almost every case. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Long term survival in patients after urgent cardiac transplantation and perceived quality of life. RESULTS--Of 18 patients who were alive at short term follow up (mean (range) 19.4 (10-33) months), 14 were still alive in 1992 (69 (61-83) months). Ten still worked full time, and 11 reported no restrictions in their daily activities. Three of four patients who died in the intervening period survived > 5 years after transplantation. Overall, 17 of 18 patients survived at least 5 years. CONCLUSIONS--In severely ill patients who undergo urgent cardiac transplantation and survive in the short term, long term (5-7 year) survival and quality of life seem good.     

Simple mechanical methods for cardioversion: defence of the precordial thump and cough version.

A prospective study was made of the value of the precordial thump and of cough version in life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Of about 5000 medical and surgical patients, 68 were treated for persistent ventricular tachycardia and 248 for ventricular fibrillation, 86 of whom had presented outside hospital. Mechanical intervention was successful in 26 incidents occurring in 23 patients. Electrocardiographic records were obtained in 14 instances. Ventricular fibrillation was terminated by a thump in five patients and ventricular tachycardia by either a thump or a cough in a total of 17 patients. Four additional instances were recorded of successful recovery from asystolic or unspecified circulatory arrest after a precordial thump. Fifteen patients survived to be discharged from hospital. The potential benefit of the precordial thump and cough versions greatly outweighs their risks; hence these manoeuvres should probably be reintroduced into schedules for first aid resuscitation.     

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a University Hospital: An Analysis of Survival and Cost

A cost analysis and study were done of patient survival after inhospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation during one year at a university hospital. The immediate survival rate in 128 patients was 52 percent. Survival to discharge and six-month survival rates were 19 percent and 15.6 percent, respectively. In all, 23 patients (18 percent) had multiple arrests (two to four per patient) during the same hospital stay. Immediate and six-month survival rates in this group were 52 percent (12 patients) and 9 percent (two patients), respectively. Gender or location where cardiopulmonary arrests occurred in the hospital did not influence survival. The cost of a Code Blue (direct expenses only) was $366. We conclude that the outcome following resuscitation at this university hospital compares favorably with the experience of others, and that the direct cost is modest in relation to the results obtained.     

The shock for life: early defibrillation in first aid and by the professional paramedic]

The Automated External Defibrillation is the key link of the chain of survival for patients in cardiac arrest. A lot of case series and trials have shown the effectiveness of early defibrillation by first rescuers and trained lay persons. The earlier the defibrillation is performed, the better is the rate of survival to hospital discharge. To increase the survival rate healthcare providers, first rescuer citizens at worksites and trained lay rescuers should be authorized, equipped and encouraged to perform early defibrillation combined with effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The new generation of Automated External Defibrillators (AED) are sophisticated, computerized devices that are reliable and simple to operate, enabling also lay rescuers to administer this lifesaving intervention to victims of cardiac arrest. For the concept of recurrent adequate and qualified training in the use of the AED integrated in effective DPR is recommended.     

Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the effect on survival of treatment by ambulance paramedics and ambulance technicians after cardiac arrest outside hospital. DESIGN--Prospective study over two years from 1 April 1992 to 31 March 1994. SETTING--Accident and emergency department of university teaching hospital. SUBJECTS--502 consecutive adult patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest of cardiac origin. INTERVENTIONS--Treatment by ambulance technicians or paramedics both equipped with semiautomatic defibrillators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Rate of return of spontaneous circulation, hospital admission, and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS--Rates of return of spontaneous circulation, hospital admission, and survival to hospital discharge were not significantly different for patients treated by paramedics as opposed to ambulance technicians. Paramedics spent significantly longer at the scene of the arrest than technicians (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS--The response of ambulance paramedics to patients with cardiopulmonary arrest outside hospital does not provide improved outcome when compared with ambulance technicians using basic techniques and equipped with semi-automatic defibrillators.