Vascular patterning: more than just auxin?

The plant hormone auxin has long been known to play a pivotal role in vascular patterning and differentiation. But auxin is not the whole story: recent genetic analyses have identified additional factors required for vascular patterning, one of them involving sterols.     

Do we have the auxin receptor yet?

Several auxin-binding proteins (ABP) have now been identified using a variety of techniques. A 43-kDa glycoprotein thought to be a dimer of 22-kDa subunits has been identified as a strong candidate for the auxin receptor that mediates cell elongation in etiolated maize shoots. The primary sequence has been deduced and several interesting structural features have been discerned. There is indirect evidence that this 22-kDa ABP has a receptor function, the most compelling being that antibodies directed against the ABP can block an auxin-induced response. There is evidence that changes in auxin-induced growth capacity in shoots correlates with changes in the abundance of the 22-kDa ABP suggesting that in some cases the 22-kDa ABP may be limiting growth. Confirmation of receptor function for one of these newly-identified ABP's should open the way for genetic manipulation of crop growth.     

Dead end for auxin conjugates in Physcomitrella?

For proper development of plants auxin levels need to be tightly controlled. For this, several routes have evolved and it is plausible that different organisms use these differently. To determine whether members of the family of GH3 proteins, which partially act as auxin conjugate synthetases in Arabidopsis thaliana, have similar roles in the moss Physcomitrella patens, we have investigated the in vitro activity of the two GH3 members in moss. We showed that both proteins can form amino acid conjugates with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) but also with jasmonic acid (JA). Confirming these findings, single and double knockout-mutants showed lower levels of IAA conjugates than wild type. We discuss the results in light of the possible functions of IAA conjugate formation in lower land plants.Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, auxin metabolism, jasmonic acid, GH3 genes, moss, Physcomitrella patensAuxins play diverse roles in many aspects of plant growth and development. Their activity is relying on the correct concentration in a given tissue and developmental stage.¹ If higher levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) are present, the hormone can also have an inhibitory effect on growth processes.² Therefore, the tight control of IAA concentrations is absolutely necessary. To this end plants have evolved different mechanisms.³ First, biosynthesis is contributing to increasing IAA concentrations, mostly in young tissues such as meristems. Second, IAA can be transported in a polar way, depending on transport molecules, from cell to cell, away from the site of synthesis, thereby forming an auxin gradient along the plant axis. Third, IAA can be degraded, and fourth, IAA can be reversibly inactivated by conjugation to small molecules such as amino acids or sugars, but also be linked to larger molecules such as peptides or proteins.⁴ The inactive IAA conjugates can be hydrolyzed to yield free (i.e., active) IAA if needed. In higher plants the levels of free IAA constitutes between 5 and 20% depending on the tissue or age of the plant, whereas the conjugated form constitutes the major part.⁴ However, it is not yet clear in which way auxin homeostasis has evolved. The hypothesis that auxin has to be present during the evolution of a body plan has been tested by using different lower land plants which were compared in their mechanism to control auxin homeostasis. In algae, e.g., charophytes, the major metabolic way of controlling IAA is via biosynthesis. In bryophytes, the formation of IAA conjugates has been shown, although the amount was lower than for example in seed plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana.^5,6 Since the molecular biology of auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis is most advanced, we will use this model plant to compare the knowledge on seed plants with that in the moss Physcomitrella patens. The recent publication of the Physcomitrella genome⁷ gives the possibility to investigate components of the machinery controlling IAA levels in a lower land plant.In general, there seem to be high levels of redundancy involved in the pathways leading to decrease or increase of IAA, respectively. In Figure 1 we compare the current knowledge about genes related to IAA concentrations in Physcomitrella with Arabidopsis. While in Arabidopsis many different biosynthetic routes leading to IAA were identified,⁸ in the Physcomitrella genome homologs of the YUCCA genes have been detected.⁷ The presence of auxin conjugate synthetases has been experimentally verified in the moss (see below) and additional evidence for ester conjugate synthesis comes from sequence homology to UDP-glucosyl transferases.⁷ There is also the possibility of degradation of either IAA or an amino acid conjugate with IAA^9,10 as discussed below.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Comparison of possibilities to regulate auxin homeostasis in Physcomitrella (solid lines) and Arabidopsis (dotted lines). Biosynthesis—AO, aldehyde oxidase; AMI1, amidase; CYP, cytochrome P450; NIT, nitrilase; TAA1, tryptophan aminotransferase; YUCCA, flavin monooxygenase; transport—AUX/LAX, auxin influx facilitator family; PIN, auxin efflux carrier family; PGP, ABC transporter type auxin efflux carrier family; conjugation/hydrolysis—UGT, UDP-glucosyl transferase; GH3, auxin conjugate synthetase family; ILR/IAR, auxin conjugate hydrolase family; Ox-IAA, oxindole-3-acetic acid; Ox-IAAsp, oxindole-3-aspartic acid.So far our work has focussed on the characterization of two members of the so called GH3 family, of which several from Arabidopsis can form conjugates of IAA with a variety of amino acids.¹¹ While 19 members of this family have been described in Arabidopsis, only two are present in Physcomitrella.¹² The Arabidopsis family clusters in three groups: group I containing the jasmonic acid conjugate synthetase JAR1 and a few others with as yet unkown function, group II the auxin conjugate synthetases, and group III with mostly as yet uncharacterized members.^11,13 Sequence similarity of the GH3 genes from Physcomitrella showed that both cluster within the JAR1 group.¹² Therefore, we analyzed the enzymatic activity of the two Physcomitrella GH3 proteins (PpGH3-1 and PpGH3-2) in vitro¹⁴ and found that both were active on jasmonic acid and a variety of different amino acids, whereas PpGH3-2 was active mostly with IAA. PpGH3-1 showed only weak activity with IAA and only two amino acids. For this reason, it could be assumed that the two Physcomitrella genes evolved by gene duplication, from which the initial activities would be for IAA and jasmonic acid. One of these genes might have evolved into a jasmonate conjugate synthetase (maybe AtJAR1),¹³ thereby loosing its activity on IAA. The second may have given rise to the auxin conjugate synthetase family in Arabidopsis,¹¹ but the conjugate synthetases of Physcomitrella have still activity with both hormones. Interestingly, there is no evidence as yet that jasmonic acid itself has a role during Physcomitrella development, although a possible function of JA-conjugates has not been closely investigated. Since in Arabidopsis the JA conjugate with isoleucine is the active compound to be recognized by the COI1 receptor protein,¹⁵ it could be the case that JA itself has no effect in Physcomitrella. However, in our growth experiments a small growth promoting effect of JA, independently on the presence of GH3 genes was found. Similar observations were made with gibberellins in Physcomitrella.¹⁶Further characterization of single and double KO mutants in each of the PpGH3 genes has led to the hypothesis that GH3 proteins are indeed involved in regulating the auxin homeostasis in Physcomitrella.¹⁴ Both single KO mutants were more sensitive to increasing IAA concentrations in the medium than the wild type. Furthermore, the levels of free IAA were higher and the levels of conjugated IAA concomitantly dropped. A double KO mutant had almost no IAA conjugates when compared to the wild type. However, this mutant was still able to synthesize ester conjugates with IAA. Interestingly, the role of GH3 proteins in auxin conjugation seemed to be only important in the gametophore stage, whereas protonema cultures of GH3 KO mutants did not show any changes in auxin homeostasis. Therefore, we hypothesize that the role of GH3 proteins is dependent on a certain developmental stage of the moss. Additionally, we propose other detoxification mechanisms for example, export or degradation, in protonema.In higher plants the ester conjugate formation of IAA has been shown to be dependent on UDP-glucosyl transferases (AtUGT84B1 for Arabidopsis¹⁷ and ZmIAGLU for maize¹⁸). In the genome of Physcomitrella we could detect candidate sequence(s) for these genes, indicating that Physcomitrella has indeed the potential to synthesise the ester conjugates found in the gametophores in addition to amide conjugates. However, in the Physcomitrella genome, no homolog for an auxin conjugate hydrolase was found. In higher plants, auxin conjugate hydrolysis is thought to contribute to free IAA and depending on the plant species, large gene families with overlapping but distinct substrate preferences for individual amino acid conjugates with IAA are present.^19,20 Since this is not the case for Physcomitrella, one has to ask the question whether the conjugation of auxin is a one-way road for inactivation of excess auxin and whether auxin conjugate hydrolysis has evolved later during plant evolution.In the Selaginella moellendorffii genome (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Selmo1/Selmo1.home.html), an auxin conjugate hydrolase sequence related to higher plant ones, has been found based on homology searches, but the completion of the genome has to be awaited to draw final conclusions. Likewise, it is not clear, if this effect is specific for Physcomitrella, or found in bryophytes in general. Therefore, additional sequenced bryophyte genomes are needed.²¹Since in Arabidopsis the degradation of the IAA-Aspartate conjugate to Ox-IAA-Asp (see Fig. 1) has been described,^9,10 a similar scenario could be suggested to occur in Physcomitrella with the amino acid conjugates formed. Alternatively, the hydrolysis of IAA conjugates by members of the M20 dipeptidase family can be envisioned. However, this would need the activity of enzymes with very low sequence conservation to auxin conjugate hydrolases. These questions will be addressed in future research by studying the metabolism of IAA and IAA conjugates of Physcomitrella in more detail.     

Increased auxin efflux in the IAA-overproducing sur1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana: A mechanism of reducing auxin levels?

With the aim of investigating the mechanisms that maintain auxin homeostasis in plants, we have monitored the net uptake and metabolism of exogenously supplied indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and naphthalene-1-acetic acid (NAA) in seedlings of wild type and the IAA-overproducing mutant sur1 of Arabidopsis thaliana . Tritiated IAA and NAA entered the seedling tissues within minutes and were mostly accumulated as metabolites, probably amino acid and sugar conjugates. The mutant seedlings were marked by a strong increase of [³H]IAA metabolism and a reduction of the accumulation levels of both free [³H]IAA and [³H]NAA. The same characteristics were observed in wild-type seedlings grown on 5 μ M picloram. We measured [³H]NAA uptake in the presence of high concentrations of unlabeled NAA or the auxin efflux carrier inhibitor naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA). This abolished the difference in free [³H]NAA accumulation between the mutant or picloram-treated seedlings and wild-type seedlings. These data indicated that active auxin efflux carriers were present in Arabidopsis seedling tissues. Picloram-treated seedlings and seedlings of the IAA-overproducing mutant sur1 displayed increased auxin efflux carrier activity as well as elevated conjugation of IAA. There is previous evidence to suggest that conjugation is a means to remove excess IAA in plant cells. Here, we discuss the possibility of efflux constituting an additional mechanism for regulating free IAA levels in the face of an excess auxin supply.     

Root patterning: does auxin provide positional cues?

Patterning of Arabidopsis roots is mediated by cell-cell interactions, information flowing from differentiated to immature cells. The plant growth regulator auxin has now been shown to be involved in organizing the distal end of the root apex, including the extent and pattern of cell division programs and specification of cell identity.     

A Role for auxin during actinorhizal symbioses formation?

The symbiotic interaction between the soil bacteria Frankia and actinorhizal plants leads to the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules resembling modified lateral roots. Little is known about the signals exchanged between the two partners during the establishment of these endosymbioses. However, a role for plant hormones has been suggested.Recently, we studied the role of auxin influx activity during actinorhizal symbioses. An inhibitor of auxin influx was shown to perturb nodule formation. Moreover we identified a functional auxin influx carrier that is produced specifically in Frankia-infected cells. These results together with previous data showing auxin production by Frankia lead us to propose a model of auxin action during the symbiotic infection process.Key words: lateral roots, nitrogen fixation, Frankia, AUX1, actinorhizal symbioses, phenylacetic acid, auxin influxActinorhizal symbioses result from the interaction between the soil actinomycete Frankia and plants belonging to eight angiosperm families collectively called actinorhizal plants.¹ This symbiotic interaction leads to the formation of a new organ on the root system, the actinorhizal nodule, where the bacteria are hosted and fix nitrogen.² Unlike legume nodules, actinorhizal nodules are structurally and developmentally related to lateral roots.³ Little is known about the signals exchanged between the two partners during the establishment of the symbiosis.² Diffusible signals are emitted by Frankia at early stages of the interaction resulting in root hair deformation.² The chemical nature of these signals remains unknown, however, detailed studies revealed that they are different from rhizobial Nod factors.⁴ Phytohormones are chemicals that control many developmental processes⁵ and have been linked to many plant-microbe interactions. Recently, we studied the role of auxin influx in actinorhizal nodule formation in the tropical tree Casuarina glauca.⁶     

Flavonoids and auxin transport: modulators or regulators?

Flavonoids are polyphenolic compounds found in all vascular and non-vascular plants. Although nonessential for plant growth and development, flavonoids have species-specific roles in nodulation, fertility, defense and UV protection. Flavonoids have been shown to modulate transport of the phytohormone auxin in addition to auxin-dependent tropic responses. However, flavonoids are not essential regulators of these processes because transport and tropic responses occur in their absence. Flavonoids modulate the activity of auxin-transporting P-glycoproteins and seem to modulate the activity of regulatory proteins such as phosphatases and kinases. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that auxin transport mechanisms evolved in the presence of flavonoid compounds produced for the scavenging of reactive oxygen species and defense from herbivores and pathogens.     

Do phytotropins inhibit auxin efflux by impairing vesicle traffic?

Phytotropins such as 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) strongly inhibit auxin efflux, but the mechanism of this inhibition remains unknown. Auxin efflux is also strongly decreased by the vesicle trafficking inhibitor brefeldin A (BFA). Using suspension-cultured interphase cells of the BY-2 tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Bright-Yellow 2) cell line, we compared the effects of NPA and BFA on auxin accumulation and on the arrangement of the cytoskeleton and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The inhibition of auxin efflux (stimulation of net accumulation) by both NPA and BFA occurred rapidly with no measurable lag. NPA had no observable effect on the arrangement of microtubules, actin filaments, or ER. Thus, its inhibitory effect on auxin efflux was not mediated by perturbation of the cytoskeletal system and ER. BFA, however, caused substantial alterations to the arrangement of actin filaments and ER, including a characteristic accumulation of actin in the perinuclear cytoplasm. Even at saturating concentrations, NPA inhibited net auxin efflux far more effectively than did BFA. Therefore, a proportion of the NPA-sensitive auxin efflux carriers may be protected from the action of BFA. Maximum inhibition of auxin efflux occurred at concentrations of NPA substantially below those previously reported to be necessary to perturb vesicle trafficking. We found no evidence to support recent suggestions that the action of auxin transport inhibitors is mediated by a general inhibition of vesicle-mediated protein traffic to the plasma membrane.     

Function of the ubiquitin–proteosome pathway in auxin response

Proteolysis of important regulatory proteins by the ubiquitin–proteosome pathway is a key aspect of cellular regulation in eukaryotes. Genetic studies in Arabidopsis indicate that response to auxin depends on the function of proteins in this pathway. The auxin transport inhibitor resistant 1 (TIR1) protein is part of a ubiquitin–protein–ligase complex (E3), known as SKP1 CDC53 F-box^TIR1 (SCF^TIR1), that possibly directs ubiquitin-modification of protein regulators of the auxin response. In yeast, a similar E3 complex, SCF^CDC4, is regulated by conjugation of the ubiquitin-related protein Rub1 to the Cdc53 protein. In Arabidopsis, the auxin-resistant1 (AXR1) gene encodes a subunit of the RUB1-activating enzyme, the first enzyme in the RUB-conjugation pathway. Loss of AXR1 results in loss of auxin response. These results suggest a model in which RUB1 modification regulates the activity of SCF^TIR1, thereby directing the degradation of the repressors of the auxin response.     

Is there a role for auxin in early embryogenesis?

The very young embryo of a flowering plant is not an idealsystem in which to study the effects of auxin. Conversely, auxin isusually not considered as a major component of developmental processesin early embryogenesis. However, recent findings from both experimentalstudies in Brassica and analyses of developmental mutants inArabidopsis make it worthwhile to examine critically thepossibility that auxin may have a role in early embryogenesis. In thisreview, we will focus on specific processes, such as formation of anapical-basal axis of polarity and the initiation of the primary rootmeristem. To provide a conceptual framework in which to discuss possibleeffects of auxin, we will first briefly summarise essential features ofearly embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. This will be followed by anevaluation of relevant data suggesting a role for auxin in axisformation and root meristem initiation. Finally, we will discuss a fewexperimental approaches that we believe are necessary to examine whetheror not auxin plays a role in fundamental processes of earlyembryogenesis.     

Polar auxin transport – old questions and new concepts?

Polar auxin transport controls multiple aspects of plant development including differential growth, embryo and root patterning and vascular tissue differentiation. Identification of proteins involved in this process and availability of new tools enabling `visualization' of auxin and auxin routes in planta largely contributed to the significant progress that has recently been made. New data support classical concepts, but several recent findings are likely to challenge our view on the mechanism of auxin transport. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the polar auxin transport field. It starts with classical models resulting from physiological studies, describes the genetic contributions and discusses the molecular basis of auxin influx and efflux. Finally, selected questions are presented in the context of developmental biology, integrating available data from different fields.     

Does ethylene induce elongation of the rice coleoptile through auxin?

Ethylene stimulated the elongation of intact rice (Oryza sativaL.) coleoptiles in which endogenous growth had been stoppedcompletely by decapitation and red light. p-Chlorophenoxyisobutyricacid slightly inhibited endogenous growth, but not the ethyleneinduced growth. Thus, ethylene could stimulate the elongationof coleoptiles in which the auxin level was considered to bevery low. ¹ Present address: Institute for Agricultural Research, TohokuUniversity, Katahira, Sendai 980, Japan. (Received February 16, 1979; )     

Is auxin the repressor signal of branch growth in apical control?

"Apical control" is the repression of branch growth by a higher dominating branch or shoot. There has been some confusion in the literature concerning the meaning and causal mechanisms of this correlative phenomenon with those of "apical dominance," which term is often used in a strict sense to connote the repression of the initiation of axillary bud outgrowth by an active shoot apex. Although the term "apical control" is most commonly employed with respect to woody species, this phenomenon also widely occurs in herbaceous plants. Because of the strong evidence for a role of auxin as a repressor signal in apical dominance and partly because of this lack of distinction in terminology, a similar role for auxin in apical control is often assumed in spite of the obvious acropetal auxin transport difficulty and the lack of direct evidence for the acropetal transport of any inhibitor influence. In the present study with the herbaceous Ipomoea nil, it has been clearly demonstrated that while exogenous auxin (1% NAA) strongly restores apical dominance in the Thimann-Skoog experiment, auxin treatments to decapitated dominant shoots do not, in any observable way, restore apical control in lower dominated branches. Hence, in this fast-growing species, the hypothesis for the role of auxin as a repressor signal for apical control is not supported.