The S. cerevisiae architectural HMGB protein NHP6A complexed with DNA: DNA and protein conformational changes upon binding

NHP6A is a non-sequence-specific DNA-binding protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae which belongs to the HMGB protein family. Previously, we have solved the structure of NHP6A in the absence of DNA and modeled its interaction with DNA. Here, we present the refined solution structures of the NHP6A-DNA complex as well as the free 15bp DNA. Both the free and bound forms of the protein adopt the typical L-shaped HMGB domain fold. The DNA in the complex undergoes significant structural rearrangement from its free form while the protein shows smaller but significant conformational changes in the complex. Structural and mutational analysis as well as comparison of the complex with the free DNA provides insight into the factors that contribute to binding site selection and DNA deformations in the complex. Further insight into the amino acid determinants of DNA binding by HMGB domain proteins is given by a correlation study of NHP6A and 32 other HMGB domains belonging to both the DNA-sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific families of HMGB proteins. The resulting correlations can be rationalized by comparison of solved structures of HMGB proteins.     

Mechanism of DNA flexibility enhancement by HMGB proteins

The mechanism by which sequence non-specific DNA-binding proteins enhance DNA flexibility is studied by examining complexes of double-stranded DNA with the high mobility group type B proteins HMGB2 (Box A) and HMGB1 (Box A+B) using atomic force microscopy. DNA end-to-end distances and local DNA bend angle distributions are analyzed for protein complexes deposited on a mica surface. For HMGB2 (Box A) binding we find a mean induced DNA bend angle of 78°, with a standard error of 1.3° and a SD of 23°, while HMGB1 (Box A+B) binding gives a mean bend angle of 67°, with a standard error of 1.3° and a SD of 21°. These results are consistent with analysis of the observed global persistence length changes derived from end-to-end distance measurements, and with results of DNA-stretching experiments. The moderately broad distributions of bend angles induced by both proteins are inconsistent with either a static kink model, or a purely flexible hinge model for DNA distortion by protein binding. Therefore, the mechanism by which HMGB proteins enhance the flexibility of DNA must differ from that of the Escherichia coli HU protein, which in previous studies showed a flat angle distribution consistent with a flexible hinge model.     

Determinants of HMGB proteins required to promote RAG1/2-recombination signal sequence complex assembly and catalysis during V(D)J recombination

Efficient assembly of RAG1/2-recombination signal sequence (RSS) DNA complexes that are competent for V(D)J cleavage requires the presence of the nonspecific DNA binding and bending protein HMGB1 or HMGB2. We find that either of the two minimal DNA binding domains of HMGB1 is effective in assembling RAG1/2-RSS complexes on naked DNA and stimulating V(D)J cleavage but that both domains are required for efficient activity when the RSS is incorporated into a nucleosome. The single-domain HMGB protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nhp6A, efficiently assembles RAG1/2 complexes on naked DNA; however, these complexes are minimally competent for V(D)J cleavage. Nhp6A forms much more stable DNA complexes than HMGB1, and a variety of mutations that destabilize Nhp6A binding to bent microcircular DNA promote increased V(D)J cleavage. One of the two DNA bending wedges on Nhp6A and the analogous phenylalanine wedge at the DNA exit site of HMGB1 domain A were found to be essential for promoting RAG1/2-RSS complex formation. Because the phenylalanine wedge is required for specific recognition of DNA kinks, we propose that HMGB proteins facilitate RAG1/2-RSS interactions by recognizing a distorted DNA structure induced by RAG1/2 binding. The resulting complex must be sufficiently dynamic to enable the series of RAG1/2-mediated chemical reactions on the DNA.     

Concentration-dependent exchange accelerates turnover of proteins bound to double-stranded DNA

The multistep kinetics through which DNA-binding proteins bind their targets are heavily studied, but relatively little attention has been paid to proteins leaving the double helix. Using single-DNA stretching and fluorescence detection, we find that sequence-neutral DNA-binding proteins Fis, HU and NHP6A readily exchange with themselves and with each other. In experiments focused on the Escherichia coli nucleoid-associated protein Fis, only a small fraction of protein bound to DNA spontaneously dissociates into protein-free solution. However, if Fis is present in solution, we find that a concentration-dependent exchange reaction occurs which turns over the bound protein, with a rate of k_exch = 6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹. The bacterial DNA-binding protein HU and the yeast HMGB protein NHP6A display the same phenomenon of protein in solution accelerating dissociation of previously bound labeled proteins as exchange occurs. Thus, solvated proteins can play a key role in facilitating removal and renewal of proteins bound to the double helix, an effect that likely plays a major role in promoting the turnover of proteins bound to DNA in vivo and, therefore, in controlling the dynamics of gene regulation.     

Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non-sequence-specific binding

NHP6A is a chromatin-associated protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae belonging to the HMG1/2 family of non-specific DNA binding proteins. NHP6A has only one HMG DNA binding domain and forms relatively stable complexes with DNA. We have determined the solution structure of NHP6A and constructed an NMR-based model structure of the DNA complex. The free NHP6A folds into an L-shaped three alpha-helix structure, and contains an unstructured 17 amino acid basic tail N-terminal to the HMG box. Intermolecular NOEs assigned between NHP6A and a 15 bp 13C,15N-labeled DNA duplex containing the SRY recognition sequence have positioned the NHP6A HMG domain onto the minor groove of the DNA at a site that is shifted by 1 bp and in reverse orientation from that found in the SRY-DNA complex. In the model structure of the NHP6A-DNA complex, the N-terminal basic tail is wrapped around the major groove in a manner mimicking the C-terminal tail of LEF1. The DNA in the complex is severely distorted and contains two adjacent kinks where side chains of methionine and phenylalanine that are important for bending are inserted. The NHP6A-DNA model structure provides insight into how this class of architectural DNA binding proteins may select preferential binding sites.     

Modulation of HU–DNA interactions by salt concentration and applied force

HU is one of the most abundant proteins in bacterial chromosomes and participates in nucleoid compaction and gene regulation. We report experiments using DNA stretching that study the dependence of DNA condensation by HU on force, salt and HU concentration. Previous experiments at sub-physiological salt levels revealed that low concentrations of HU could compact DNA, whereas larger HU concentrations formed a DNA-stiffening complex. Here we report that this bimodal binding behavior depends sensitively on salt concentration. Only the compaction mode was observed for 150 mM and higher NaCl levels, i.e. for physiological salt concentrations. Similar results were obtained for the more physiological salt K-glutamate. Real-time studies of dissociation kinetics revealed that HU unbound slowly (minutes to hours under the conditions studied) but completely for salt concentrations at or above 100 mM NaCl; the lifetime of HU complexes was observed to increase with the HU concentration at which the complexes were formed, and to decrease with salt concentration. Higher salt levels of 300 mM NaCl completely eliminated observable HU binding to DNA. Finally, we observed that the dissociation kinetics depend on force applied to the DNA: increased applied force in the sub-piconewton range accelerates dissociation, suggesting a mechanism for DNA tension to regulate chromosome structure and gene expression.     

Nuclear Localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMG Protein NHP6A Occurs by a Ran-Independent Nonclassical Pathway

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae non-histone protein 6-A (NHP6A) is a member of the high-mobility group 1/2 protein family that bind and bend DNA of mixed sequence. NHP6A has only one high-mobility group 1/2 DNA binding domain and also requires a 16-amino-acid basic tail at its N-terminus for DNA binding. We show in this report that nuclear accumulation of NHP6A is strictly correlated with its DNA binding properties since only nonhistone protein 6 A–green fluorescent protein chimeras that were competent for DNA binding were localized to the nucleus. Despite the requirement for basic residues within the N-terminal segment for DNA binding and nuclear accumulation, this region does not appear to contain a nuclear localization signal. Moreover, NHP6A does not bind to the yeast nuclear localization signal receptor SRP1 and nuclear targeting of NHP6A does not require the function of the 14 different importins. Unlike histone H2B1 which contains a classical nuclear localization signal, entry of NHP6A into the nucleus was found to be independent of Ran as judged by coexpression of Ran GTPase mutants and was shown to occur at 0 °C after a 15-min induction. These unusual properties lead us to suggest that NHP6A entry into the nucleus proceeds by a nonclassical Ran-independent pathway.     

Eukaryotic HMGB proteins as replacements for HU in E. coli repression loop formation

DNA looping is important for gene repression and activation in Escherichia coli and is necessary for some kinds of gene regulation and recombination in eukaryotes. We are interested in sequence-nonspecific architectural DNA-binding proteins that alter the apparent flexibility of DNA by producing transient bends or kinks in DNA. The bacterial heat unstable (HU) and eukaryotic high-mobility group B (HMGB) proteins fall into this category. We have exploited a sensitive genetic assay of DNA looping in living E. coli cells to explore the extent to which HMGB proteins and derivatives can complement a DNA looping defect in E. coli lacking HU protein. Here, we show that derivatives of the yeast HMGB protein Nhp6A rescue DNA looping in E. coli lacking HU, in some cases facilitating looping to a greater extent than is observed in E. coli expressing normal levels of HU protein. Nhp6A-induced changes in the DNA length-dependence of repression efficiency suggest that Nhp6A alters DNA twist in vivo. In contrast, human HMGB2-box A derivatives did not rescue looping.     

Determinants of specific binding of HMGB1 protein to hemicatenated DNA loops

Protein HMGB1 has long been known as one of the most abundant non-histone proteins in the nucleus of mammalian cells, and has regained interest recently for its function as an extracellular cytokine. As a DNA-binding protein, HMGB1 facilitates DNA-protein interactions by increasing the flexibility of the double helix, and binds specifically to distorted DNA structures. We have previously observed that HMGB1 binds with extremely high affinity to a novel DNA structure, hemicatenated DNA loops (hcDNA), in which double-stranded DNA fragments containing a tract of poly(CA).poly(TG) form a loop maintained at its base by a hemicatenane. Here, we show that the single HMGB1 domains A and B, the HMG-box domain of sex determination factor SRY, as well as the prokaryotic HMGB1-like protein HU, specifically interact with hcDNA (Kd approximately 0.5 nM). However, the affinity of full-length HMGB1 for hcDNA is three orders of magnitude higher (Kd<0.5 pM) and requires the simultaneous presence of both HMG-box domains A and B plus the acidic C-terminal tail on the molecule. Interestingly, the high affinity of the full-length protein for hcDNA does not decrease in the presence of magnesium. Experiments including a comparison of HMGB1 binding to hcDNA and to minicircles containing the CA/TG sequence, binding studies with HMGB1 mutated at intercalating amino acid residues (involved in recognition of distorted DNA structures), and exonuclease III footprinting, strongly suggest that the hemicatenane, not the DNA loop, is the main determinant of the affinity of HMGB1 for hcDNA. Experiments with supercoiled CA/TG-minicircles did not reveal any involvement of left-handed Z-DNA in HMGB1 binding. Our results point to a tight structural fit between HMGB1 and DNA hemicatenanes under physiological conditions, and suggest that one of the nuclear functions of HMGB1 could be linked to the possible presence of hemicatenanes in the cell.     

Transfer of recA protein from one polynucleotide to another. Effect of ATP and determination of the processivity of ATP hydrolysis during transfer

The transfer of recA protein from a fluorescently modified single-stranded DNA, containing 1,N6-ethenoadenosine and 3,N4-ethenocytosine, to polydeoxythymidylic acid (poly(dT)) was shown to occur by a complex mechanism in both the absence and presence of ADP (Menetski, J. P., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2085-2092). A part of the mechanism involves the formation of a kinetic ternary intermediate. Since the binding and hydrolysis of ATP by recA protein is involved in many of the recA protein in vitro activities, we have analyzed the effect of ATP on the transfer reaction. In the presence of ATP, the transfer reaction is dependent on the concentration of the competitor single-stranded DNA, poly(dT). This result suggests that transfer does not occur by a simple dissociation mechanism. The reaction occurs via two kinetically distinct species of protein X DNA complexes with properties that are similar to those characterized for the transfer reaction in the absence of ATP. There is a complicated effect of nucleotide concentration on the rate of transfer. At low concentrations of ATP (less than 50 microM), increasing nucleotide concentration increases the rate of transfer; this is similar to the effect of ADP. However, at high concentrations of ATP (greater than 50 microM), increasing ATP concentration decreases the rate of transfer. Finally, the processivity of ATP hydrolysis during transfer was found to increase with increases in ATP concentration. Less than one ATP molecule was hydrolyzed per transfer event at low ATP concentrations (less than 20 microM) while greater than 50 molecules were hydrolyzed at high ATP concentration (greater than 250 microM). These data suggest that the rate of transfer is not directly coupled to the rate of hydrolysis.     

The DNA architectural protein HMGB1 displays two distinct modes of action that promote enhanceosome assembly

HMGB1 (also called HMG-1) is a DNA-bending protein that augments the affinity of diverse regulatory proteins for their DNA sites. Previous studies have argued for a specific interaction between HMGB1 and target proteins, which leads to cooperative binding of the complex to DNA. Here we propose a different model that emerged from studying how HMGB1 stimulates enhanceosome formation by the Epstein-Barr viral activator Rta on a target gene, BHLF-1. HMGB1 stimulates binding of individual Rta dimers to multiple sites in the enhancer. DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and immobilized template assays failed to reveal stable binding of HMGB1 within the complex. Furthermore, mutational analysis failed to identify a specific HMGB1 target sequence. The effect of HMGB1 on Rta could be reproduced by individual HMG domains, yeast HMO1, or bacterial HU. These results, combined with the effects of single-amino-acid substitutions within the DNA-binding surface of HMGB1 domain A, argue for a mechanism whereby DNA-binding and bending by HMGB1 stimulate Rta-DNA complex formation in the absence of direct interaction with Rta or a specific HMGB1 target sequence. The data contrast with our analysis of HMGB1 action on another BHLF-1 regulatory protein called ZEBRA. We discuss the two distinct modes of HMGB1 action on a single regulatory region and propose how HMGB1 can function in diverse contexts.     

66 Architectural role of HMO1 in bending,bridging, and compacting DNA

HMO1 proteins are abundant Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) High Mobility Group Box (HMGB) protein (Kamau, Bauerla & Grove, 2004). HMGB proteins are nuclear proteins which are known to be architectural proteins (Travers, 2003). HMO1 possesses two HMGB box domains. It has been reported that double box HMGB proteins induce strong bends upon binding to DNA. It is also believed that they play an essential role in reorganizing chromatin and, therefore, are likely to be involved in gene activation. To characterize DNA binding we combine single molecule stretching experiments and AFM imaging of HMO1 proteins bound to DNA. By stretching DNA bound to HMO1, we determine the dissociation constant, measure protein induced average DNA bending angles, and determine the rate at which torsional constraint of the DNA is released by the protein. To further investigate the local nature of the binding, AFM images of HMO1-DNA complexes are imaged, and we probe the behavior of these complexes as a function of protein concentration. The results show that at lower concentrations, HMO1 preferentially binds to the ends of the double helix and links to the separate DNA strands. At higher concentrations HMO1 induces formation of a complex network that reorganizes DNA. Although HMG nuclear proteins are under intense investigation, little is known about HMO1. Our studies suggest that HMO1 proteins may facilitate interactions between multiple DNA molecules.     

Testing mechanisms of DNA sliding by architectural DNA-binding proteins: dynamics of single wild-type and mutant protein molecules in vitro and in vivo

Architectural DNA-binding proteins (ADBPs) are abundant constituents of eukaryotic or bacterial chromosomes that bind DNA promiscuously and function in diverse DNA reactions. They generate large conformational changes in DNA upon binding yet can slide along DNA when searching for functional binding sites. Here we investigate the mechanism by which ADBPs diffuse on DNA by single-molecule analyses of mutant proteins rationally chosen to distinguish between rotation-coupled diffusion and DNA surface sliding after transient unbinding from the groove(s). The properties of yeast Nhp6A mutant proteins, combined with molecular dynamics simulations, suggest Nhp6A switches between two binding modes: a static state, in which the HMGB domain is bound within the minor groove with the DNA highly bent, and a mobile state, where the protein is traveling along the DNA surface by means of its flexible N-terminal basic arm. The behaviors of Fis mutants, a bacterial nucleoid-associated helix-turn-helix dimer, are best explained by mobile proteins unbinding from the major groove and diffusing along the DNA surface. Nhp6A, Fis, and bacterial HU are all near exclusively associated with the chromosome, as packaged within the bacterial nucleoid, and can be modeled by three diffusion modes where HU exhibits the fastest and Fis the slowest diffusion.     

HU binding to DNA: evidence for multiple complex formation and DNA bending

HU, a nonspecific histone-like DNA binding protein, participates in a number of genomic events as an accessory protein and forms multiple complexes with DNA. The HU-DNA binding interaction was characterized by fluorescence, generated with the guanosine analogue 3-methyl-8-(2-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)isoxanthopterin (3-MI) directly incorporated into DNA duplexes. The stoichiometry and equilibrium binding constants of complexes formed between HU and 13 and 34 bp DNA duplexes were determined using fluorescence anisotropy and analytical ultracentrifugation. These measurements reveal that three HU molecules bind to the 34 bp duplexes, while two HU molecules bind to the 13 bp duplex. The data are well described by an independent binding site model, and the association constants for the first binding event for both duplexes are similar (approximately 1 x 10(6) M(-1)), indicating that HU binding affinity is independent of duplex length. Further analysis of the binding curves in terms of a nonspecific binding model is indicative that HU binding to DNA exhibits little to no cooperativity. The fluorescence intensity also increases upon HU binding, consistent with decreased base stacking and increased solvent exposure of the 3-MI fluorescence probe. These results are suggestive of a local bending or unwinding of the DNA. On the basis of these results we propose a model in which bending of DNA accompanies HU binding. Up to five complex bands are observed in gel mobility shift assays of HU binding to the 34 bp duplexes. We suggest that protein-induced bending of the DNA leads to the observation of complexes in the gel, which have the same molecular weight but different relative mobilities.     

Structural organization of DNA complexes with proteins HMGB1 and HMGB1-(A+B)

The interaction between DNA and the nonhistone proteins HMGB1 and HMGB1-(A+B) has been studied using circular dichroism and scanning force microscopy. The recombinant protein HMGB1-(A+B) has no negatively charged C-terminal domain characteristic for HMGB1. Our earlier suggestion about the structural interaction of tandem HMGB1-domains of the recombinant protein with DNA was confirmed. It was shown that the C-terminal part modulates the interactions of HMGB1-domains with DNA. Without the C-terminal sequence, the HMGB1-(A+B) protein forms DNA-protein complexes with the ordered supramolecular structure.     

DNA bending versus DNA end joining activity of HMGB1 protein is modulated in vitro by acetylation

The ability of HMGB1 protein to recognize bent DNA and to induce bending in linear duplex DNA defines HMGB1 as an architectural factor. It has already been demonstrated that the binding affinity of the protein for various bent DNA structures is enhanced upon in vivo acetylation at Lys2. Here we investigate how this modification of HMGB1 affects its ability to bend DNA. We report that the modified protein cannot bend short DNA fragments but, instead, stimulates joining of the same fragments via their ends. The same properties are exhibited in vivo by acetylated HMGB1 lacking its acidic tail. Further, in vitro acetylation of the truncated protein at Lys81 (possible upon tail removal only) restores the protein's bending ability, while the level of stimulation of DNA end joining is strongly reduced. We conclude, therefore, that the ability of HMGB1 to bend DNA or to stimulate end joining is modulated in vitro by acetylation. In an attempt to explain the properties of in vivo-acetylated HMGB1, its complexes with DNA have been analyzed by both protein-DNA cross-linking and atomic force microscopy. Unlike the parental protein, bound mainly within the internal sequences, acetylated HMGB1 binds preferentially to DNA ends. We propose that the loading of acetylated protein on DNA ends accounts for both the failure to bend DNA and the stimulation of DNA end joining.     

The structure of the complexes of DNA with non-histone chromosomal protein HMGB1 in the presence of manganese ions

The complexes of DNA - HMGB1 protein - manganese ions have been studied using circular dichroism (CD) technique. It was shown that in such three-component system the interactions of both the protein and metal ions with DNA differ from those in two-component complexes. The manganese ions do not affect the CD spectrum of free HMGB1 protein. However, Mn2+ ions induce considerable changes in the CD spectrum of free DNA in the spectral range of 260-290 nm. The presence of Mn2+ ions prevents formation of the ordered supramolecular structures specific for the HMGB1-DNA complexes. The interaction of manganese ions with DNA has a marked influence on the local DNA structure changing the properties of protein-binding sites. This results in the serious decrease in cooperativity of the DNA-protein binding. Such changes in the mode of the DNA-protein interactions occur at concentrations as small as 0.01 mM Mn2+. Moreover, the changes in local DNA structure induced by manganese ions promote the appearance of new HMGB1 binding sites on the DNA double helix. At the same time interactions with HMGB1 protein induce alterations in the structure of the DNA double helix which increase with a growth of the protein/DNA ratio. These alterations make the DNA/protein complex especially sensitive to manganese ions. Under these conditions the Mn2+ ions strongly affect the DNA structure that reflects in abrupt changes of the CD spectra of DNA in the complex in the range of 260-290 nm. Thus, structural changes of the DNA double helix in the three-component DNA-HMGB1-Mn2+ complexes come as a result of the combined and interdependent interactions of DNA with Mn2+ ions and the molecules of HMGB1.