Randomized trial on 14 versus 7 days of esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin for second-line or rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin has been proven effective in first‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aim: To explore 1, the value of triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin in second‐line or rescue treatment of Caucasian patients and 2, the impact of treatment duration on eradication success. Methods: H. pylori‐infected patients with at least one previous treatment failure were randomized to oral esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., moxifloxacin 400 mg o.d., and amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d. for either 7 (EMA‐7) or 14 days (EMA‐14). Eradication was confirmed by 13C urea breath test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in all patients at baseline and in patients who failed treatment. Results: Eighty patients were randomized, and 60% had ≥2 previous treatment failures. Pretreatment resistance against clarithromycin and metronidazole was found in 70.5 and 61.5% of cases, respectively. The intention‐to‐treat eradication rate was significantly higher after EMA‐14 compared with EMA‐7 (95.0 vs 78.9%, p = .036). No independent risk factor for treatment failure could be identified. There were no serious adverse events. Five of the EMA‐14 patients (12.5%) compared with none of the EMA‐7 patients discontinued prematurely because of adverse events (p = .031). Post‐treatment resistance against moxifloxacin was found in one of seven patients with isolated organisms (14.3%). Conclusion: Second‐line/rescue H. pylori eradication therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin is very effective and well tolerated. Fourteen days of treatment significantly increase the eradication rate but also the rate of adverse events.     

Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis

Background: Moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy has been suggested as an alternative second‐line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. Aims: To systematically review the efficacy and tolerance of moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy in second‐line H. pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta‐analysis of studies comparing this regimen with bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, Web of Science, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (updated to December 2010), and manual searches were conducted. A meta‐analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy to bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy in the second‐line treatment of H. pylori infection was performed. Results: Seven RCTs including 787 patients were assessed. The meta‐analysis showed that the eradication rate in the moxifloxacin group was significantly higher than that in the quadruple therapy group (74.9 vs 61.4%, OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.38–2.58, p < .0001); besides, the rates of side effects and discontinuing therapy because of side effects in the moxifloxacin group were significantly lower than those in the quadruple therapy group (side effects: 10.1 vs 27.8%, OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18–0.41, p < .00001; discontinuing therapy because of side effects: 1.4 vs 8.2%, OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.40, p < .0001). These results were constant in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Moxifloxacin‐containing triple regimen is more effective and better tolerated than the bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy in the second‐line treatment of H. pylori infection.     

Salvage therapy after two or more prior Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: the super salvage regimen

Background. Although effective therapies are available for curing Helicobacter pylori infection, the problem persists about what to do for patients who fail two or more treatment courses despite a good compliance. Aim. To test a twice a day midday quadruple therapy as salvage therapy. Methods. Dyspeptic H. pylori‐infected patients who failed two or more courses of anti‐H. pylori therapy received omeprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg twice a day (with the midday and evening meals) for 14 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test and histology 4–6 weeks after therapy. Eradication was defined as no positive test. Results. Seventy‐one patients were enrolled and 68 completed the full 14 days of therapy (mean age 46 years; 28 men). Thirty‐three patients had failed prior treatment twice, 19 had failed three times, and 16 had failed four or more times. The cure rates were: intention to treat = 93% (66/71); (95% CI = 84% to 98%), per protocol = 97% (66/68); (95% CI = 89%– 100%). Success was excellent irrespective of diagnosis, age, prior treatment protocols, or smoking status. Moderate side‐effects were experienced by only two patients. Conclusion. Midday bismuth subcitrate based twice a day quadruple therapy was an excellent salvage therapy. BID midday quadruple regimen should be considered as the therapy of choice.     

A prospective,randomized study of quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

Background and Aim. Failure of primary anti‐H. pylori therapy results in a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Here, we investigated the efficacy of high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy as salvage treatments for eradication of H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin. Patients and Methods. Patients with at least one treatment failure and infected with H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin, were randomized to receive either omeprazole 4 × 40 mg and amoxicillin 4 × 750 mg; or omeprazole 2 × 20 mg, bismuthcitrate 4 × 107 mg, metronidazole 4 × 500 mg and tetracycline 4 × 500 mg. Both regimens were given for 14 days. In cases of persistent infection, a cross‐over therapy was performed. Results. Eighty‐four patients were randomized. Cure of H. pylori infection was achieved in 31 patients after dual therapy and in 35 patients after quadruple therapy (per protocol: 83.8% (95% CI, 67.9–93.8) and 92.1% (95% CI, 78.6–98.3), respectively (p = 0.71); intention to treat: 75.6% (95% CI: 59.7–87.6) and 81.4% (95% CI: 66.6–91.6), respectively (p = 0.60)). Cross‐over therapy was performed in six of nine patients, four of whom were cured of the infection. Conclusion. Both high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy are effective in curing H. pylori infection resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin in patients who experienced previous treatment failures.     

'Rescue' therapy with rifabutin after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures

Aim. Eradication therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is extensively used, although it fails in a considerable number of cases. A ‘rescue’ therapy with a quadruple combination of omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics) has been recommended, but it still fails in approximately 20% of cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a rifabutin‐based regimen in patients with two consecutive H. pylori eradication failures. Patients and Methods. Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: Consecutive patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin and a second trial with omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (three patients) or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics (11 patients) had failed were included. Intervention: A third eradication regimen with rifabutin (150 mg bid), amoxicillin (1 g bid) and omeprazole (20 mg bid) was prescribed for 14 days. All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Outcome: H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative ¹³C‐urea breath test 8 weeks after completing therapy. Results. Fourteen patients have been included. Mean age ± SD was 42 ± 11 years, 41% males, peptic ulcer (57%), functional dyspepsia (43%). All patients took all the medications and completed the study protocol. Per‐protocol and intention‐to‐treat eradication was achieved in 11/14 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval = 49–95%). Adverse effects were reported in five patients (36%), and included: abdominal pain (three patients), nausea and vomiting (one patient), and oral candidiasis (one patient); no patient abandoned the treatment due to adverse effects. Conclusion. Rifabutin‐based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline.     

Randomized comparison of two non-bismuth-containing second-line rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori

Background: Classical second‐line anti‐Helicobacter pylori includes proton‐pump inhibitor, tetracycline, metronidazole, and bismuth salts, but alternative therapies are required owing to the restricted availability of the latter. Levofloxacin‐containing triple therapy is recommended but is expensive. Besides, quinolone resistance in an endemic tuberculosis infection area like Taiwan is concerned. The low in vitro antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin and tetracycline in Taiwanese H. pylori strains implies that in vivo esomeprazole/amoxicillin/tetracycline (EAT) second‐line rescue therapy may be effective. This study compared the efficacy of esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin (EAL) and EAT second‐line eradication therapies and determines the clinical factors influencing the efficacy of salvage regimens. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty‐eight patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy for 7 days are randomly assigned to either EAL group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and levofloxacin 500 mg once daily) for 7 days or EAT group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times daily) for 14 days. Follow‐up endoscopy or urea breath test was performed 8 weeks later to assess treatment response. Results: The eradication rates of EAL and EAT groups were 78.1 versus 75.0%, p = .676 (in intention‐to‐treat analysis) and 80.3 versus 80%, p = .0964 (per‐protocol analysis). Both groups exhibited similar drug compliance (95.3 vs 96.9%, p = .952) but more adverse events in the EAT group (6.3 vs 12.5%, p = .225). Conclusions: Despite low in vitro drug resistances to amoxicillin and tetracycline, the efficacy of 14‐day EAT regimens attained an unacceptable report card of 75% eradication rates in intention‐to‐treat analysis and was not even superior to the 7‐day EAL regimen. Drug–drug interaction between combined antibiotics should be considered other than in vivo drug resistances.     

Rabeprazole Can Overcome the Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Quadruple Therapy

Objectives: The prospective study was designed to clarify the impact of CYP2C19 on quadruple therapies and survey the efficacies of rabeprazole‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. Patients and Methods: From January 2007 to March 2009, 1055 H. pylori‐infected patients received standard triple regimens (proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 865 (81.9%) subjects. One hundred ninety eradication‐failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7‐day eradication therapy. Ninety‐six patients were treated with esomeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (EB), while 94 patients were treated with rabeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (RB). Follow‐up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients’ responses, CYP2C19 genotypes, and antibiotics resistances were also examined. Results: Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed that RB had better eradication rates than EB (EB: 72.9%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.9% and RB: 78.7%; 95% CI 72.5–84.9%) (p value = .543). Per‐protocol results were EB = 75.3%; 95% CI: 70.3–80.3% and RB = 85.1%; 95% CI: 80.6–89.6% (p value = .0401). Both regimens had similar compliance (p value = 0.155) and adverse events (p value = 0.219). We also surveyed those patients without resistance of any antibiotics. RB still showed better outcome than EB. Our data showed that esomeprazole‐based regimen and CYP2C19 Hom EM genotype were important predictors for eradication failure. Conclusions: In quadruple therapy, rabeprazole‐based regimens had better efficacy than esomeprazole‐based regimens. CYP2C19 polymorphism also played an important role in quadruple therapy. It seems advisable to change PPI to rabeprazole in second‐line quadruple therapy.     

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study

Background: The eradication rates of first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients after an unsuccessful 10‐day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14‐day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per‐protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.     

Effectiveness and safety of repeated quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of second-line quadruple therapy: repeated quadruple therapy as a third-line therapy

Backgrounds: Quadruple therapy using a proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline is a standard second‐line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, achieving an eradication rate of about 80% in Korea. A standard third‐line therapy is not currently established, although various protocols have been proposed. We performed this study to evaluate the effectiveness of a retrial with quadruple therapy before starting a third‐line treatment with new drugs. Materials and Methods: In 80 of 746 patients treated with a second‐line quadruple therapy at the Korea University Ansan Hospital between January 2002 and September 2010, treatment for H. pylori had failed, and 45 of these patients were eligible for this study. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed by repeated endoscopy or by the ¹³C‐urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. The patients with treatment failure were treated again with quadruple regimen for 2 weeks and reevaluated for treatment effectiveness and safety. Results: The eradication rate with second‐line quadruple therapy was 86.9%. Of the 80 patients who failed treatment for H. pylori with the initial second‐line quadruple therapy, 64 patients were treated again with the same regimen. Of the 45 retreated patients in this study, three patients were lost to follow‐up and two complied poorly with medication. The eradication rate in the 40 patients retreated was 75.0% at per‐protocol analysis. Seventeen patients experienced mild adverse events. Conclusions: A retrial of quadruple therapy before use of a third‐line therapy may be safe and effective for patients who fail to respond to second‐line quadruple therapy.     

The effects of probiotics on PPI-triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background: This study was performed to evaluate whether the addition of probiotics to proton pump inhibitor (PPI)‐based triple therapy increases the likelihood of successful Helicobacter pylori eradication. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and forty‐seven H. pylori‐infected patients were randomized into a triple‐plus‐yogurt group (yogurt group, n = 168) or a triple‐only group (control group, n = 179). Triple therapy consisted of PPI b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 7 days. Yogurt group received triple therapy for 1 week and one bottle of Will yogurt per day for at 3 weeks, starting on the first day of triple therapy. Will yogurt (a Korean brand) contains Lactobacillus acidophilus HY2177, Lactobacillus casei HY2743, Bifidobacterium longum HY8001, and Streptococcus thermophilus B‐1. ¹³C‐urea breath test was performed at least 4 weeks after completion of triple therapy. Eradication rates, compliances, and adverse events were compared. Results: By intention‐to treat analysis the H. pylori eradication rates in the yogurt group 79.2% (133 of 168) was similar to that in the control group 72.1% (129 of 179) (p = .124). However, by per‐protocol (PP) analysis, the eradication rate in the yogurt group, 87.5% (133 of 152) was higher than that in the control group, 78.7% (129 of 164) (p = .037). Common adverse events were metallic taste (11.8%) and diarrhea (8.6%). The frequency of adverse effects in the yogurt group 41.1% (69/168) were higher than in the control group, 26.3% (47 of 179) (p = .003). However, most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and the severities of adverse effects were similar in both groups (p = .401). Conclusions: The addition of Will yogurt to triple therapy did not reduce the side‐effects of triple therapy. But it increased the H. pylori eradication rate by PP analysis, encouraging more research in this field.     

Serum antibodies to Helicobacter pylori and its heat-shock protein 60 correlate with the response of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma to eradication of H. pylori

Background and aims. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to regression of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. In this study, we measured serum antibodies to H. pylori and H. pylori‐recombinant heat‐shock protein 60 (rHSP60) in patients with gastric MALT lymphoma to determine whether humoral immune responses to the bacterial antigens correlate with the efficacy of eradication therapy. Methods. Serum samples were obtained from 33 patients with H. pylori‐positive gastric MALT lymphoma before undergoing therapy to eradicate the bacteria. Anti‐H. pylori antibodies were measured in a commercial assay and in immunoassays to lysates and rHSP60 which were prepared from ATCC 43504 strain. Results. Helicobacter pylori were eradicated in all 33 patients, and the lymphoma completely regressed histologically in 26 patients (79%). Pre‐treatment titers of serum antibody to H. pylori and to rHSP60 in the patients whose tumor regressed were significantly higher than titers in patients whose tumors did not regress (p = .0011 and .035, respectively). By logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.80–0.99), endoscopic appearance (0.053, 0.004–0.65), titers of anti‐H. pylori antibodies (67.6, 2.5–1800), and titers of anti‐rHSP60 antibody (6.4, 1.2–36) were identified as significantly associated factors with the outcome of MALT lymphoma. Conclusions. Measurement of serum antibodies to H. pylori and HSP60 might be useful for predicting the response of gastric MALT lymphoma to eradication of H. pylori.     

Interactions Among Gastric Somatostatin, Interleukin-8 and Mucosal Inflammation in Helicobacter pylori-Positive Peptic Ulcer Patients

Background. To investigate whether Helicobacter pylori infection, but not drugs, affects gastric somatostatin, interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), histological inflammation through eradication therapy, and interactions among these parameters. Methods. Twenty‐eight H. pylori‐positive patients (21 males; mean age 47.0 years) with either gastric ulcer (GU: n = 11) or duodenal ulcer (n = 17) diagnosed endoscopically were treated with dual therapy. Eradication was defined as negative microbiologic tests and ¹³C‐urea breath test. Levels of antral and gastric juice somatostatin and mucosal IL‐8 were measured by radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Histology was assessed by the Sydney system. Results. H. pylori was eradicated in 15 patients (10 males, 6 GU) out of 28 (54%). The patients’ backgrounds did not affect the eradication of H. pylori. Successes in eradication significantly increased antral and juice somatostatin contents, and dramatically decreased IL‐8 levels and histological gastritis. In contrast, persistent H. pylori infection did not affect somatostatin and histological gastritis. An inverse correlation was present between changes in somatostatin levels and histological activity. No relationship was observed in changed values between antral somatostatin and IL‐8. Conclusions. These results indicate that eradication of H. pylori, but not the drugs used, induced an increase in somatostatin levels in the antrum and gastric juice, suggesting a close relationship between H. pylori and gastric somatostatin regulation. A close correlation between an increase in gastric somatostatin levels and the normalization of histological activity was present, suggesting that certain peptide‐immune interactions in the gastric mucosa exist in H. pylori infection.     

Twice-a-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized trial of 10 and 14 days

Background: Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy given twice a day for 14 days has been shown to be an excellent first‐line H. pylori eradication therapy. Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice‐a‐day bismuth‐containing quadruple H. pylori eradication therapy for 10 versus 14 days in a noninferiority trial. Methods: Dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection and naïve to H. pylori treatment were randomly assigned to: pantoprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg given b.i.d. (with the midday and evening meals) for 10 or 14 days. Eradication was defined by negative UBT and/or histology 4–6 weeks posttherapy. Efficacy and side effects were determined. Results: A total of 417 patients were randomized (153 men, 264 women; median age 52). Per protocol (PP) treatment success with 14 and 10 days was essentially identical [i.e., 96% (95% CI: 92–98) vs 95% (95% CI: 91–98) for 14 days versus 10 days, respectively. Results with intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis were also similar (92% (95% CI, 87–95) vs 92% (95% CI, 88–96)) for 14 and 10 days, respectively. Compliance was excellent in both groups. Side effects were generally mild and similar between groups. Fatigue, discomfort, and vomiting were more common in those in the 14‐day group. The 10‐day regimen costs € 17.65 (ie, approximately 25%) less than the 14‐day regimen. Conclusions: Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy remained highly effective (i.e., ≥95% PP and >90% ITT) despite reducing the duration from 14 to 10 days.     

Rank order of success favors longer duration of imidazole-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a randomized pilot study

Background. Studies on eradication therapy in developing countries have shown a success rate of 70–85%, which is suboptimal. Duration of therapy may be an important factor dictating eradication success in such regions. Aim. The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of increasing the treatment period on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease. Methods. A randomized trial was carried out in which 64 consecutive H. pylori‐infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. The patients were randomized to one of the three trial arms. Therapy consisted of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. The treatment period was 1 week in group I, 2 weeks in group II and 3 weeks in group III. At inclusion, patients underwent endoscopy and the presence of H. pylori was documented by a positive urease test and C14 urea breath test. Four weeks after completion of eradication therapy, the patients were subjected to repeat endoscopy to assess ulcer healing and tests for H. pylori infection. Results. Sixty‐four patients (55 male and nine female; mean age 35.5 years) were enrolled in each group. The H. pylori eradication rate for group I (1 week of therapy) was 47.6%, that for group II (2 weeks of therapy) was 80%, and that for group III (3 weeks of therapy) was 91.3% (p = .003). The ulcer healing rates were 71.4, 80 and 95.6% in groups I, II and III, respectively (p = .09). Conclusion. The 3‐week regimen significantly improved the eradication rate as compared with the 1‐week regime. Increasing the duration of therapy significantly improved the chances of eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.     

Lafutidine,a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist,vs lansoprazole in combination with amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background. In contrast to the growing amount of data concerning proton pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, it is still controversial whether proton pump inhibitor can be replaced by H₂ receptor antagonist without compromising efficacy. Lafutidine is a novel potent H₂ receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activities such as enhancement of gastric mucosal blood flow. Methods. 122 outpatients with positive cultures and subsequent successful cultivation of H. pylori for antimicrobial susceptibility tests were randomized to receive a 7‐day course of either lafutidine (20 mg twice daily) or lansoprazole (30 mg twice daily), plus clarithromycin (200 mg twice daily) and amoxicillin (750 mg twice daily). Eradication was considered successful if the rapid urease test, culture, histology and [ 13 ]C‐urea breath test were all negative at least 4 weeks after cessation of therapy. Cytochrome p450 2C19 genotype status using polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism was also studied. Results. On intention‐to‐treat basis, H. pylori cure was achieved in 52 of 61 (85.2%) patients and 49 of 61 (80.3%) patients for the lafutidine‐ and lansoprazole‐based therapies, respectively. The predicted 95% confidential intervals for the 4.9% of the difference were ?1.8–11.6%. Using per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 88.2% (52/59) and 84.5% (49/58), respectively. The predicted 95% confidential intervals for the 3.7% of the difference were ?2.6–10.0%. Adverse events were observed in five and six patients, from the lafutidine and lansoprazole groups, respectively, but they were generally mild. Genetic predisposition of cytochrome p450 2C19 had no significant influence on treatment outcome in both regimens. Conclusions. The lafutidine‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin therapy yielded satisfactory results for eradicating H. pylori, which was comparable with those of the lansoprazole‐based regimen with the same drug combination.     

Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains

Background:  Using quadruple clarithromycin‐containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is controversial with high rates of macrolide resistance. Aim:  To evaluate antibiotic resistance rates and the efficacy of empirical and tailored nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy in a setting with cure rates <80% for triple and sequential therapies. Methods:  209 consecutive naive H. pylori‐positive patients without susceptibility testing were empirically treated with 10‐day concomitant therapy (proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg; all drugs b.i.d.). Simultaneously, 89 patients with positive H. pylori culture were randomized to receive triple versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, and sequential versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Eradication was confirmed with ¹³C‐urea breath test or histology 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Results:  Per‐protocol (PP) and intention‐to‐treat eradication rates after empirical concomitant therapy without susceptibility testing were 89% (95%CI:84–93%) and 87% (83–92%). Antibiotic resistance rates were: clarithromycin, 20%; metronidazole, 34%; and both clarithromycin and metronidazole, 10%. Regarding clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, concomitant therapy was significantly better than triple therapy by per protocol [92% (82–100%) vs 74% (58–91%), p = 0.05] and by intention to treat [92% (82–100%) vs 70% (57–90%), p = 0.02]. As for antibiotic‐resistant strains, eradication rates for concomitant and sequential therapies were 100% (5/5) vs 75% (3/4), for clarithromycin‐resistant/metronidazole‐susceptible strains and 75% (3/4) vs 60% (3/5) for dual‐resistant strains. Conclusions:  Empirical 10‐day concomitant therapy achieves good eradication rates, close to 90%, in settings with multiresistant H. pylori strains. Tailored concomitant therapy is significantly superior to triple therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori and at least as effective as sequential therapy for resistant strains.     

Oxidative damage of the gastric mucosa in Helicobacter pylori positive chronic atrophic and nonatrophic gastritis, before and after eradication

Background. Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of gastritis and a primary carcinogen. The aim of this study was to assess oxidative damage in mucosal compartments of gastric mucosa in H. pylori positive and negative atrophic and nonatrophic gastritis. Materials and methods. Five groups of 10 patients each were identified according to H. pylori positive or negative chronic atrophic (Hp‐CAG and CAG, respectively) and nonatrophic gastritis (Hp‐CG and CG, respectively), and H. pylori negative normal mucosa (controls). Oxidative damage was evaluated by nitrotyrosine immunohistochemistry in the whole mucosa and in each compartment at baseline and at 2 and 12 months after eradication. Types of intestinal metaplasia were classified by histochemistry. Results. Total nitrotyrosine levels appeared significantly higher in H. pylori positive than in negative patients, and in Hp‐CAG than in Hp‐CG (p < .001); no differences were found between H. pylori negative gastritis and normal mucosa. Nitrotyrosine were found in foveolae and intestinal metaplasia only in Hp‐CAG. At 12 months after H. pylori eradication, total nitrotyrosine levels showed a trend toward a decrease in Hp‐CG and decreased significantly in Hp‐CAG (p = .002), disappearing from the foveolae (p = .002), but remaining unchanged in intestinal metaplasia. Type I and II of intestinal metaplasia were present with the same prevalence in Hp‐CAG and CAG, and did not change after H. pylori eradication. Conclusions. Oxidative damage of the gastric mucosa increases from Hp‐CG to Hp‐CAG, involving the foveolae and intestinal metaplasia. H. pylori eradication induces a complete healing of foveolae but not of intestinal metaplasia, reducing the overall oxidative damage in the mucosa.     

Second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized comparison of 1-week or 2-week bismuth-containing quadruple therapy

Objectives: The increasing levels of bacterial antibiotic resistance have increased the need to evaluate the second‐line treatments for Helicobacter pylori. Bismuth‐based quadruple therapy is recommended as a second‐line treatment, but the optimal duration of this treatment is still debatable. We prospectively analyzed the eradication rate of H. pylori according to the duration of the second‐line bismuth‐based quadruple therapy. Methods: One hundred and ninety‐nine patients who failed at H. pylori eradication were prospectively randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, metronidazole 500 mg thrice daily, and bismuth subcitrate 300 mg and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily for 7 days (PBMT7) or for 14 days (PBMT14). The post‐treatment H. pylori status was determined by the ¹³C‐urea breath test. The eradication rates, drug compliance, and side effects of each group were evaluated. Results: The intention‐to‐treat (ITT) eradication rates were 81.6% (95% CI 73.9–89.3%, 80/98) in the PBMT7 arm and 85.1% (95% CI 78.2–92.0%, 86/101) in the PBMT14 arm (p = .028, noninferiority test), while the per‐protocol (PP) eradication rates were 89.6% (95% CI 83.2–96.0%, 78/87) and 96.2% (95% CI 92.0–100.0% 77/80) (p = .015, noninferiority test), respectively. The compliance was 88.8% (87/98) and 79.2% (80/101) in the PBMT7 and PBMT14 groups, respectively. (p = .066) The number of patients having severe side effects was 15.3% (15/98) and 21.8% (22/101) in the PBMT7 and PBMT14 groups, respectively, which was similar between both groups. (p = .243). Conclusions: Although PBMT7 was not inferior to PBMT14 statistically, PBMT could not demonstrate enough ITT/PP eradication rate. Therefore, it could be better to extend the duration of treatment for 2 weeks for the second‐line treatment of H. pylori in Korea.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori by 7-day triple-therapy regimens combining pantoprazole with clarithromycin, metronidazole, or amoxicillin in patients with peptic ulcer disease: results of two double-blind, randomized studies

Aim. To compare the short‐term (7‐day) safety and efficacy of two triple‐therapy regimens using pantoprazole with those of two dual‐therapy regimens (one with pantoprazole and one without), for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Methods. H. pylori infection was identified by rapid urease (CLOtest), and confirmed by histology and culture. Patients were enrolled into one of two randomized, double‐blind, multicenter, parallel‐group studies. In study A, patients received oral pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg (PCM); pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin 1000 mg (PCA); or pantoprazole and clarithromycin (PC). In study B, patients received PCM, PCA, PC, or clarithromycin and metronidazole without pantoprazole (CM). Treatments were given twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori status after therapy was assessed by histology and culture at 4 weeks after completing the course of study treatment. Modified intent‐to‐treat (MITT; each study: n = 424, n = 512) and per‐protocol (PP; each study: n = 371, n = 454) populations were analyzed. The MITT population comprised all patients whose positive H. pylori status was confirmed by culture and histology; the PP population comprised patients who also complied with ≥ 85% of study medication doses. Results. A total of 1016 patients were enrolled. Cure rates among patients with clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 86% for PCM, and 72 and 71% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. Cure rates among patients with metronidazole‐susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 87% for PCM, and 71 and 69% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. The combined eradication rates observed with the PCM regimen were superior to those of all other regimens tested. Side‐effects were infrequent and mild. Conclusions. PCM had the highest overall eradication rate in these two studies examining 7‐day treatment regimens. All regimens were safe and well tolerated.     

Moxifloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Effect of Treatment Duration and Antibiotic Resistance on the Eradication Rate

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy as second‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. We also investigated the effect of treatment duration and antibiotic resistance on the eradication rate of this therapy. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients found to have persistent H. pylori infections after failure of first‐line proton‐pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy. Patients took moxifloxacin (400 mg q.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.), and esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.). The eradication rate, drug compliance, and adverse event rates were evaluated. Minimal inhibitory tests were performed for moxifloxacin and amoxicillin by the agar dilution method. Results: In 2004, 41 patients were treated for 7 days. The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates (ITT/PP) were 75.6/83.8%. Moxifloxacin resistance was 5.6%. Therapy was extended to 10 days during 2005–2006 and 139 patients were treated. The ITT/PP eradication rates were 71.9/82.6%; moxifloxacin resistance had increased to 12%. The final group of 181 patients in 2007–2008 who were treated for 14 days also had low eradication rates (68/79.9%), but there was no statistical significance in the efficacy among the treatment periods. Moxifloxacin resistance in 2007–2008 was 28.2%. Side‐effect increased with treatment duration (i.e., 9.8, 12.2, and 25.4% at 7, 10, and 14 days, respectively, p = .001). Conclusion: The 7‐day moxifloxacin‐containing triple therapy produced an unacceptably low eradication rate. Increasing the duration of therapy was expected to increase the eradication rate, but the expected increased did not materialize, most likely because of coincident marked increase in the prevalence of resistance to moxifloxacin. Tailored treatment based on antibiotic susceptibility testing might be more effective in the achievement of high eradication rate when rapid antibiotic resistance such as moxifloxacin is occurring.