Potential G-quadruplex formation at breakpoint regions of chromosomal translocations in cancer may explain their fragility

Genetic alterations like point mutations, insertions, deletions, inversions and translocations are frequently found in cancers. Chromosomal translocations are one of the most common genomic aberrations associated with nearly all types of cancers especially leukemia and lymphoma. Recent studies have shown the role of non-B DNA structures in generation of translocations. In the present study, using various bioinformatic tools, we show the propensity of formation of different types of altered DNA structures near translocation breakpoint regions. In particular, we find close association between occurrence of G-quadruplex forming motifs and fragile regions in almost 70% of genes involved in rearrangements in lymphoid cancers. However, such an analysis did not provide any evidence for the occurrence of G-quadruplexes at the close vicinity of translocation breakpoint regions in nonlymphoid cancers. Overall, this study will help in the identification of novel non-B DNA targets that may be responsible for generation of chromosomal translocations in cancer.     

Chromosomal rearrangements breakpoints clusterization: is the clonal selection involved

Certain types of cancer are often correlate with certain chromosomal rearrangements. The chimaeric genes are formed as a result of this rearrangements, and the chimaeric proteins are the products of their expression. The breakpoints of such translocation are often clustered in the genome. Moreover, such breakpoint clusters often contain specific genomic elements like topoisomerase II consensus sites, nuclear matrix attachment regions and DNA sequences, which can make up secondary non-canonical structure. In this review we discuss whether breakpoints may be induced by chromatin structure. Furthermore, we bring up not touched upon literature question about the relation between the breakpoint clusters and the domain organization of corresponding proteins. We also consider possible mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangements.     

Stability and strand asymmetry in the non-B DNA structure at the bcl-2 major breakpoint region

The t(14;18) translocation involving the Ig heavy chain locus and the BCL-2 gene is the single most common chromosomal translocation in human cancer. Recently we reported in vitro and in vivo chemical probing data indicating that the 150-bp major breakpoint region (Mbr), which contains three breakage subregions (hotspots) (known as peaks I, II, and III), has single-stranded character and hence a non-B DNA conformation. Although we could document the non-B DNA structure formation at the bcl-2 Mbr, the structural studies were limited to chemical probing. Therefore, in the present study, we used multiple methods including circular dichroism to detect the non-B DNA at the bcl-2 Mbr. We established a new gel shift method to detect the altered structure at neutral pH on shorter DNA fragments containing the bcl-2 Mbr and analyzed the fine structural features. We found that the single-stranded region in the non-B DNA structure observed is stable for days and is asymmetric with respect to the Watson and Crick strands. It could be detected by oligomer probing, a bisulfite modification assay, or a P1 nuclease assay. We provide evidence that two different non-B conformations exist at peak I in addition to the single one observed at peak III. Finally we used mutagenesis and base analogue incorporation to show that the non-B DNA structure formation requires Hoogsteen pairing. These findings place major constraints on the location and nature of the non-B conformations assumed at peaks I and III of the bcl-2 Mbr.     

Assaying chromosomal inversions by single-molecule haplotyping

Inversions are an important form of structural variation, but they are difficult to characterize, as their breakpoints often fall within inverted repeats. We have developed a method called 'haplotype fusion' in which an inversion breakpoint is genotyped by performing fusion PCR on single molecules of human genomic DNA. Fusing single-copy sequences bracketing an inversion breakpoint generates orientation-specific PCR products, exemplified by a genotyping assay for the int22 hemophilia A inversion on Xq28. Furthermore, we demonstrated that inversion events with breakpoints embedded within long (>100 kb) inverted repeats can be genotyped by haplotype-fusion PCR followed by bead-based single-molecule haplotyping on repeat-specific markers bracketing the inversion breakpoint. We illustrate this method by genotyping a Yp paracentric inversion sponsored by >300-kb-long inverted repeats. The generality of our methods to survey for, and genotype chromosomal inversions should help our understanding of the contribution of inversions to genomic variation, inherited diseases and cancer.     

Detection of G-Quadruplex DNA Using Primer Extension as a Tool

DNA sequence and structure play a key role in imparting fragility to different regions of the genome. Recent studies have shown that non-B DNA structures play a key role in causing genomic instability, apart from their physiological roles at telomeres and promoters. Structures such as G-quadruplexes, cruciforms, and triplexes have been implicated in making DNA susceptible to breakage, resulting in genomic rearrangements. Hence, techniques that aid in the easy identification of such non-B DNA motifs will prove to be very useful in determining factors responsible for genomic instability. In this study, we provide evidence for the use of primer extension as a sensitive and specific tool to detect such altered DNA structures. We have used the G-quadruplex motif, recently characterized at the BCL2 major breakpoint region as a proof of principle to demonstrate the advantages of the technique. Our results show that pause sites corresponding to the non-B DNA are specific, since they are absent when the G-quadruplex motif is mutated and their positions change in tandem with that of the primers. The efficiency of primer extension pause sites varied according to the concentration of monovalant cations tested, which support G-quadruplex formation. Overall, our results demonstrate that primer extension is a strong in vitro tool to detect non-B DNA structures such as G-quadruplex on a plasmid DNA, which can be further adapted to identify non-B DNA structures, even at the genomic level.     

118 DNA structure-induced genetic instability in mammals

Naturally occurring repetitive DNA sequences can adopt alternative (i.e. non-B) DNA secondary structures, and often co-localize with chromosomal breakpoint “hotspots,” implicating non-B DNA in translocation-related cancer etiology. We have found that sequences capable of adopting H-DNA and Z-DNA structures are intrinsically mutagenic in mammals. For example, an endogenous H-DNA-forming sequence from the human c-MYC promoter and a model Z-DNA-forming CpG repeat induced genetic instability in mammalian cells, largely in the form of deletions resulting from DNA double-strand breaks (Wang & Vasquez, 2004; Wang et al., 2006). Characterization of the mutants revealed microhomologies at the breakpoints, consistent with a microhomology-mediated end-joining repair of the double-strand breaks (Kha et al., 2010). We have constructed transgenic mutation-reporter mice containing these human H-DNA- and Z-DNA-forming sequences to determine their effects on genomic instability in a chromosomal context in a living organism (Wang et al., 2008). Initial results suggest that both H-DNA- and Z-DNA-forming sequences induced genetic instability in mice, suggesting that these non-B DNA structures represent endogenous sources of genetic instability and may contribute to disease etiology and evolution. Our current studies are designed to determine the mechanisms of DNA structure-induced genetic instability in mammals; the roles of helicases, polymerases, and repair enzymes in H-DNA and Z-DNA-induced genetic instability will be discussed.     

Molecular characterisation of the pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 5 from the homologous chimpanzee chromosome

Human and chimpanzee karyotypes differ by virtue of nine pericentric inversions that serve to distinguish human chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 from their chimpanzee orthologues. In this study, we have analysed the breakpoints of the pericentric inversion characteristic of chimpanzee chromosome 4, the homologue of human chromosome 5. Breakpoint-spanning BAC clones were identified from both the human and chimpanzee genomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and the precise locations of the breakpoints were determined by sequence comparisons. In stark contrast to some other characterised evolutionary rearrangements in primates, this chimpanzee-specific inversion appears not to have been mediated by either gross segmental duplications or low-copy repeats, although micro-duplications were found adjacent to the breakpoints. However, alternating purine–pyrimidine (RY) tracts were detected at the breakpoints, and such sequences are known to adopt non-B DNA conformations that are capable of triggering DNA breakage and genomic rearrangements. Comparison of the breakpoint region of human chromosome 5q15 with the orthologous regions of the chicken, mouse, and rat genomes, revealed similar but non-identical syntenic disruptions in all three species. The clustering of evolutionary breakpoints within this chromosomal region, together with the presence of multiple pathological breakpoints in the vicinity of both 5p15 and 5q15, is consistent with the non-random model of chromosomal evolution and suggests that these regions may well possess intrinsic features that have served to mediate a variety of genomic rearrangements, including the pericentric inversion in chimpanzee chromosome 4.     

An integrative pan-cancer-wide analysis of epigenetic enzymes reveals universal patterns of epigenomic deregulation in cancer

BackgroundOne of the most important recent findings in cancer genomics is the identification of novel driver mutations which often target genes that regulate genome-wide chromatin and DNA methylation marks. Little is known, however, as to whether these genes exhibit patterns of epigenomic deregulation that transcend cancer types.ResultsHere we conduct an integrative pan-cancer-wide analysis of matched RNA-Seq and DNA methylation data across ten different cancer types. We identify seven tumor suppressor and eleven oncogenic epigenetic enzymes which display patterns of deregulation and association with genome-wide cancer DNA methylation patterns, which are largely independent of cancer type. In doing so, we provide evidence that genome-wide cancer hyper- and hypo- DNA methylation patterns are independent processes, controlled by distinct sets of epigenetic enzyme genes. Using causal network modeling, we predict a number of candidate drivers of cancer DNA hypermethylation and hypomethylation. Finally, we show that the genomic loci whose DNA methylation levels associate most strongly with expression of these putative drivers are highly consistent across cancer types.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that there exist universal patterns of epigenomic deregulation that transcend cancer types, and that intra-tumor levels of genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and hypermethylation are controlled by distinct processes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0699-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements

Complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) consisting of two or more breakpoint junctions have been observed in genomic disorders. Recently, a chromosome catastrophe phenomenon termed chromothripsis, in which numerous genomic rearrangements are apparently acquired in one single catastrophic event, was described in multiple cancers. Here, we show that constitutionally acquired CGRs share similarities with cancer chromothripsis. In the 17 CGR cases investigated, we observed localization and multiple copy number changes including deletions, duplications, and/or triplications, as well as extensive translocations and inversions. Genomic rearrangements involved varied in size and complexities; in one case, array comparative genomic hybridization revealed 18 copy number changes. Breakpoint sequencing identified characteristic features, including small templated insertions at breakpoints and microhomology at breakpoint junctions, which have been attributed to replicative processes. The resemblance between CGR and chromothripsis suggests similar mechanistic underpinnings. Such chromosome catastrophic events appear to reflect basic DNA metabolism operative throughout an organism's life cycle.     

Different molecular mechanisms causing 9p21 deletions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood

Deletion of chromosome 9p21 is a crucial event for the development of several cancers including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Double strand breaks (DSBs) triggering 9p21 deletions in ALL have been reported to occur at a few defined sites by illegitimate action of the V(D)J recombination activating protein complex. We have cloned 23 breakpoint junctions for a total of 46 breakpoints in 17 childhood ALL (9 B- and 8 T-lineages) showing different size deletions at one or both homologous chromosomes 9 to investigate which particular sequences make the region susceptible to interstitial deletion. We found that half of 9p21 deletion breakpoints were mediated by ectopic V(D)J recombination mechanisms whereas the remaining half were associated to repeated sequences, including some with potential for non-B DNA structure formation. Other mechanisms, such as microhomology-mediated repair, that are common in other cancers, play only a very minor role in ALL. Nucleotide insertions at breakpoint junctions and microinversions flanking the breakpoints have been detected at 20/23 and 2/23 breakpoint junctions, respectively, both in the presence of recombination signal sequence (RSS)-like sequences and of other unspecific sequences. The majority of breakpoints were unique except for two cases, both T-ALL, showing identical deletions. Four of the 46 breakpoints coincide with those reported in other cases, thus confirming the presence of recurrent deletion hotspots. Among the six cases with heterozygous 9p deletions, we found that the remaining CDKN2A and CDKN2B alleles were hypermethylated at CpG islands.     

Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia

Recurring chromosome abnormalities are strongly associated with certain subtypes of leukemia, lymphoma and sarcomas. More recently, their potential involvement in carcinomas, i.e. prostate cancer, has been recognized. They are among the most important factors in determining disease prognosis, and in many cases, identification of these chromosome abnormalities is crucial in selecting appropriate treatment protocols. Chromosome translocations are frequently observed in both de novo and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The mechanisms that result in such chromosome translocations in leukemia and other cancers are largely unknown. Genomic breakpoints in all the common chromosome translocations in leukemia, including t(4;11), t(9;11), t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17), t(12;21), t(1;19) and t(9;22), have been cloned. Genomic breakpoints tend to cluster in certain intronic regions of the relevant genes including MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO, CBFB, MYHI1, PML, RARA, TEL, E2A, PBX1, BCR and ABL. However, whereas the genomic breakpoints in MLL tend to cluster in the 5' portion of the 8.3 kb breakpoint cluster region (BCR) in de novo and adult patients and in the 3' portion in infant leukemia patients and t-AML patients, those in both the AML1 and ETO genes occur in the same clustered regions in both de novo and t-AML patients. These differences may reflect differences in the mechanisms involved in the formation of the translocations. Specific chromatin structural elements, such as in vivo topoisomerase II (topo II) cleavage sites, DNase I hypersensitive sites and scaffold attachment regions (SARs) have been mapped in the breakpoint regions of the relevant genes. Strong in vivo topo II cleavage sites and DNase I hypersensitive sites often co-localize with each other and also with many of the BCRs in most of these genes, whereas SARs are associated with BCRs in MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO and ABL, but not in the BCR gene. In addition, the BCRs in MLL, AML1 and ETO have the lowest free energy level for unwinding double strand DNA. Virtually all chromosome translocations in leukemia that have been analyzed to date show no consistent homologous sequences at the breakpoints, whereas a strong non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair signature exists at all of these chromosome translocation breakpoint junctions; this includes small deletions and duplications in each breakpoint, and micro-homologies and non-template insertions at genomic junctions of each chromosome translocation. Surprisingly, the size of these deletions and duplications in the same translocation is much larger in de novo leukemia than in therapy-related leukemia. We propose a non-homologous chromosome recombination model as one of the mechanisms that results in chromosome translocations in leukemia. The topo II cleavage sites at open chromatin regions (DNase I hypersensitive sites), SARs or the regions with low energy level are vulnerable to certain genotoxic or other agents and become the initial breakage sites, which are followed by an excision end joining repair process.