ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Root growth of Nicotiana attenuata is decreased immediately after simulated leaf herbivore attack

Image-based non-destructive methods were used to quantify root growth reactions happening within hours following simulated leaf herbivore attack.¹ The induction of wound reactions in leaves of seedlings of Nicotiana attenuata led to transiently decreased root growth rates: Upon application of the oral secretions and regurgitants of the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta, a transient decrease in root growth was observed that was more pronounced than if a mere mechanical wounding was imposed. Root growth reduction was more severe than leaf growth reduction and the timing of the transient growth reduction coincided with endogenous bursts of jasmonate (JA) and ethylene emissions reported in literature. The reaction of root growth was superimposed by a strong diel variation of root growth, which was caused by the fluctuating temperature to which the plants were exposed. Apart from the observed root growth reaction, other defense-related traits such as increased nicotine concentration, trichome length and density were activated within 72 h after wounding. Further experiments indicated that the response was elicited by fatty acid-amino acid conjugates that are contained in the oral secretions and that JA signalling is crucial for root-shoot communication here.Key words: image analysis, plant-insect interactions, Manduca sextaPlants constantly need to acclimate to a suite of fluctuating biotic and abiotic factors. Within the framework of their genetically determined response options, they react towards stress situations by maximizing protection against stress while minimizing deviations from optimal growth and development. Feeding of the larvae of the specialist lepidopteran herbivore Manduca sexta on N. attenuata has become a model case scenario for studying biotic stress.² It has been shown in great detail there, that a diverse set of plant hormones like JA, methyl jasmonate and ethylene are rapidly induced immediately following wounding or herbivore attack.^3,4,5 Acclimation occurs both on the biochemical and morphological level, e.g., by increasing defence compounds,⁶ by synthesizing defence related proteins, by emitting volatiles to attract predators and parasites of herbivores⁷ and by altering plant morphology via increased formation of trichomes, thorns or scleromorphy.^8,9 Many studies demonstrated resource based trade-offs between growth and defence on a large time scale (e.g. refs. ¹⁰ and ¹¹). Yet, it is unclear how fast a trade-off-linked reorganization of plant metabolism, diverting resources away from growth or development towards defence, can occur.Recently, development of growth imaging methods has allowed to study short-term growth responses of above-and belowground sink organs towards fluctuations of environmental factors, such as alterations of light climate¹² or responses towards gravitropic stimuli.^13–15 Clear responses are often seen best in young seedlings as they grow fast and as they can be cultivated in agar-filled, translucent Petri dishes allowing live imaging. Hence, it was the aim of our study to monitor defence reactions in the N. attenuata seedling system while at the same time assessing the dynamics of root growth reaction following such an attack.Herbivory-induced wound reactions were simulated by applying different substances on the mechanically wounded primary leaf of the seedling plant 16 d after germination.¹ Investigated substances were: (i) oral secretions and regurgitants of M. sexta larvae (OS), (ii) methyl jasmonate, (iii) fatty acid-amino acid conjugates, (iv) control solutions for the different test substances (water, buffer, lanolin). All wounding treatments were performed at the same time of the day to make sure that the reaction was not masked by fluctuating responses of the plant to temperature changes (plants were grown in a 14 h/10 h light/ dark regime with temperatures of 26°C and 22°C at day and night, respectively).Root growth was affected strongly by temperature (Fig. 1A) and increased linearly with temperature in the analyzed range. Root growth decreased markedly, if OS was added to the wounds. OS-treated and wounded control plants differed in growth reduction from about 2 h after wounding onwards. To uncouple this reduction from temperature-induced growth reductions, the experiment was repeated under continuous light and temperature, leading to a comparable result (Fig. 1B). When OS was added to wounds, nicotine concentration and trichome length and density increased within 72 h after the wounding reaction. Root growth reaction was comparable between OS-treatment and treatments, in which methyl jasmonate or fatty-acid amino acid conjugates were supplied to the wounds. The strongest difference concerning the distribution of relative elemental growth rate along the root growth zone between control and OS treatment was observed about 1 mm behind the root tip in the beginning of the central elongation zone. Leaf growth was monitored in an additional set of experiments. There, a transient decrease of growth was seen as well, but it was not as pronounced as for root growth.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Root growth in Nicotiana attenuata, grown on agar-filled Petri dishes. (A) Velocity of the root tip (V_Tip) versus temperature of the agar medium. (B) Velocity of the root tip of control plants and of plants with leaves that were wounded at t=0 and treated with oral secretions and regurgitants (OS) of Manduca sexta. Plants were grown in continuous light at T = 26°C (n = 3, mean values and SE).The kinetics of the root growth depression point on a superposition of two physiological effects: During the first hour after wounding, root growth decreases similarly in control and OS-treated plants, indicating a mere hydraulic response due to the loss of water and turgor pressure.¹² Thereafter, a specific response towards OS is observed, which coincides with the time frame of about 2–3 h that was reported for the systemic increase of JA transported from shoot to root. Baldwin et al¹⁶ reported that JA pools in roots are increased systemically (3.5-fold) within 180 minutes following mechanical wounding. Hence, JA might mediate the reduction in root growth and induce the defense machinery, which diverts resources from growth to defense.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Plant defenses against parasitic plants show similarities to those induced by herbivores and pathogens

Herbivores and pathogens come quickly to mind when one thinks of the biotic challenges faced by plants. Important but less appreciated enemies are parasitic plants, which can have important consequences for the fitness and survival of their hosts. Our knowledge of plant perception, signaling and response to herbivores and pathogens has expanded rapidly in recent years, but information is generally lacking for parasitic species. In a recent paper we reported that some of the same defense responses induced by herbivores and pathogens—notably increases in jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and a hypersensitive-like response (HLR)—also occur in tomato plants upon attack by the parasitic plant Cuscuta pentagona (field dodder). Parasitism induced a distinct pattern of JA and SA accumulation, and growth trials using genetically-altered tomato hosts suggested that both JA and SA govern effective defenses against the parasite, though the extent of the response varied with host plant age. Here we discuss similarities between the induced responses we observed in response to Cuscuta parasitism to those previously described for herbivores and pathogens and present new data showing that trichomes should be added to the list of plant defenses that act against multiple enemies and across kingdoms.Key words: Cuscuta, induced defenses, parasitic plant, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, phytohormones, hypersensitive response, trichomes, defense signalingSeveral thousand species of plants are parasitic, stealing water and nutrients from other plants through a specialized feeding structure, the haustorium.¹ Haustoria are thought to be modified roots that grow into tissues and fuse with the vascular system of their photosynthetic hosts.¹ Considering that these parasites include some of the world''s most devastating agricultural pests² and are influential, fascinating components of natural communities,^1,3 surprisingly little is known about host defenses induced by parasitic plants. To address this shortcoming, we used a metabolomics approach to track biochemical changes induced in tomato shoots by invasion of C. pentagona haustoria.⁴We found that parasitism induced large increases in both JA and SA beginning about 24 hr after formation of haustoria began, but that production of JA and SA was largely separated in time. Host production of JA was transitory and reached a maximum at 36 hr, whereas SA peaked 12 hr later and remained elevated 5 d later. We also found that C. pentagona grew larger on mutant tomato plants in which the SA (NahG) or JA (jasmonic acid-insensitive1) pathways were disrupted, suggesting that these hormones can act independently to reduce parasite growth. Taken together, these findings suggest the staggered production of JA and SA may be an adaptive response to parasitism—by sequentially activating the JA and SA pathways, tomato plants may minimize the potential for cross-talk between these sometimes antagonistic pathways^5,6 and utilize both signaling molecules.^6,7 Thus, defenses against C. pentagona contain elements characteristic of responses to both herbivores (primarily JA-mediated⁸) and pathogens (primarily SA-mediated⁹)—though it should be noted that some herbivores induce SA¹⁰ and some pathogens JA.¹¹ It is worth noting that parasitism induced predominately cis-JA, the same jasmonate isomer induced by herbivore feeding.¹² Host responses to Cuscuta seem to most resemble that of known plant responses to some pathogens in which a similar sequence of JA and SA production is required to limit disease.¹³C. pentagona also triggered a hypersensitive-like response (HLR) localized around the points of parasite attachment. Using a trypan blue staining technique, we verified host cell death in these parasite-induced lesions. The deposition of eggs by some insect herbivores can elicit the formation of necrotic tissue,¹⁴ but localized cell death is most widely associated with the hypersensitive response (HR) of plants to pathogens. This complex early defense response can restrict the growth and spread of viruses, fungi and bacteria.⁹ Our work adds to existing evidence¹⁵ that the Cuscuta-induced HLR can play a similar role by preventing or limiting the growth of the parasite.An interesting discovery was that the first attachment by C. pentagona elicited almost no response from young 10-day-old hosts, whereas a subsequent attachment after 10 days induced the wholesale changes discussed above (we also found changes in abscisic acid and free fatty acids). Trials in which we varied the age of the host and parasite indicated that host age, rather than a priming effect on defenses, determined the magnitude of response. We have previously observed that Cuscuta spp. in natural populations germinate very early in the growing season, and hypothesized that this tactic promotes successful parasitism by ensuring the presence of young hosts; recent field work seems to corroborate this.¹⁶ As with the response to Cuscuta parasitism, levels of host plant defenses against insects¹⁷ and pathogens¹⁸ are known to be vary with host age.In an earlier paper we reported that tomato plants parasitized by C. pentagona released greater amounts of volatiles than did unparasitized control plants.¹⁹ The production and release of volatiles is a hallmark of plant responses to feeding by herbivores.²⁰ Herbivore-induced volatiles serve as an indirect plant defense by attracting herbivores'' natural enemies,²¹ repelling herbivores,²² or acting as intra-plant signals that prime systemic responses.²³ Although less well documented, pathogen attack can also induce emissions of volatile compounds,²⁴ some of which are antimicrobial and may serve as a direct defense against infection.²⁵ The same volatile compounds induced by Cuscuta (e.g., 2-carene, α-pinene, limonene, β-phellandrene) were also induced by caterpillar feeding and application of JA.¹⁹ Like herbivores, the JA induced by C. pentagona may regulate the emissions of plant volatiles. Whether or how parasitic plant-induced volatiles might function in defense is unknown, but they presumably could affect host plant choice by Cuscuta seedlings, which use plant volatiles to locate and select hosts.²⁶Following on from our previous studies we examined the potential role of host trichomes in resistance to parasitism by C. pentagona. Plant trichomes have been long appreciated as the first line of defense against insect herbivores^27,28 and more recently pathogens.²⁹ We hypothesized that trichomes could also defend against parasitic plants based on our observations that (1) tomato trichomes become denser with age (Fig. 1), notably on hypocotyls which is the first area contacted by Cuscuta seedlings, and (2) these trichomes can act as a physical barrier to C. pentagona seedlings. To test this hypothesis we allowed seedlings of C. pentagona to attach to 25-day-old tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum ‘Halley 3155’) in a climate controlled growth chamber. Of 20 trials conducted, in six (30%) the parasite seedling was completely blocked by trichomes and was unable to reach the host stem—the parasite perished in each of these. Type I glandular trichomes, which are several millimeters long with a glandular tip,³⁰ were primarily responsible for the blocking effect. Thus, trichomes can defend against parasitic plants in a manner analogous to herbivores by physically obstructing their movement. Interestingly, the effectiveness of trichomes is also dependent on age of the host since those on younger tomato plants (<20 days old) are too sparse to impede Cuscuta seedlings (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1A newly germinated Cuscuta pentagona seedling encircles and attaches to the hypocotyl of a 10-day-old tomato seedling; the early development of haustoria are visible as nod-like swellings. The trichomes on hypocotyls of young tomato seedlings are not dense enough to affect C. pentagona seedlings, but the increased density of trichomes on 25-day-old plants can act as a physical barrier that blocks parasite seedlings (inset).Considering that the majority of plant defenses are mediated by only a small number of master regulators (e.g., JA, SA, ethylene),⁷ it is not surprising that plant responses to parasitic plants share commonalities with those induced by herbivores and pathogens. These few molecules mediate complex, interacting signaling networks that can be variously activated and modified by plants to tune defenses against a seemingly endless variety of attackers.⁷ Our finding that JA and SA act to defend plants from attack by other plants, further support these phytohormones as ‘global’ defense signals. It is also apparent that constitutive defenses, such as trichomes, can be effective against diverse antagonists (e.g., herbivores and parasitic plants). These new insights into host defenses against parasitic plants suggest many avenues of needed research including the molecular events induced by parasitic plant attack, the parasite-derived cues that elicit responses, and the ways in which JA and SA act to reduce parasite growth. Finally, our findings suggest it might be possible to manipulate induced responses or host plant age by varying planting date to control parasitic plants in agriculture.     

Root growth is affected differently by mechanical wounding in seedlings of the ecological model species Nicotiana attenuata and the molecular model species Arabidopsis thaliana

In the ecological model plant Nicotiana attenuata, leaf wounding or herbivory lead to a reduction of root growth via jasmonic acid (JA) signaling. A single wounding treatment is sufficient to induce this response; multiple wounding does not increase the plant growth reaction. in a recent study, in which JA bursts were elicited in leaves of the molecular model species Arabidopsis thaliana in different ways,¹ we tested whether JA induces the same response there. Root growth reduction was neither induced by foliar application of herbivore oral secretions nor by direct application of methyl jasmonate to leaves. Root growth reduction was observed when leaves were infected with the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, which persistently induces the JA signaling pathway. Yet, growth analyses of this effect in wild type and JA-signaling mutants showed that it was elicited by the bacterial toxin coronatine which suggests ethylene—but not JA-induced root growth reduction in A. thaliana. Moreover, the growth effects were somewhat masked by a light-induced diurnal decrease of root growth. Overall, we conclude that the reaction of root growth to herbivore-induced JA signaling differs among species, which is related to different ecological defence strategies that have evolved in different species.Key words: coronatine, ethylene, image analysis, phytohormones, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, woundingUpon pathogen or herbivore attack, plants have to meet the decision how much of their resources are invested in growth processes and how much into defense. The ecological model species Nicotiana attenuata increases defence measures and decreases root, but not leaf growth immediately after a single simulated herbivory event.² This reaction is elucidated via jasmonic acid (JA) signaling.³ The intensity of root growth reduction is not amplified when multiple wounding events occur (Fig. 1A). This clearly demonstrates that wounding acts as a signal for the reduction of root growth and that root growth is not reduced due to a lack of growth resources as a consequence of a resource-based trade-off between growth and defence. This hypothesis is further supported by the finding that a surplus of carbohydrates is stored in the root system,⁴ which thereby acts as a safe retreat for future re-growth of the plant after herbivore damage.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Root growth in Nicotiana attenuata and Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. (A) Root growth dynamics of Nicotiana attenuata seedlings after single and multiple wounding treatments as well as multiple wounding treatments followed by application of oral secretions of Manduca sexta (OS). Wounding treatments were applied at time points 0 h (single treatments) or at the time points 0 h, 2 h and 4 h (multiple treatments). Controls were not treated. (B) Normalized values of velocity of the root tip (v_Tip) of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings whose roots were exposed to light (control and wounded) and seedlings whose roots were darkened by wrapping aluminium foil around the Petri dish throughout the growth period. Shaded areas indicate the night period. Mean ± SE. N = 4–8.We asked ourselves whether this is a general reaction pattern that is followed in more plant species. To test this, we performed a suite of experiments on the molecular model species Arabidopsis thaliana.¹ Several studies showed that direct application of JA or methyl jasmonate (MeJA), which is commonly used to mimick herbivory-induced signaling, to the cultivation medium decrease root growth of A. thaliana. Yet, in contrast to the situation in N. attenuata, the application of MeJA to leaves did not lead to a decrease in root growth. To exclude the possibility that the MeJA applied to the leaf was not taken up by the plants, we induced plant-internal JA bursts by mechanical wounding and/or application of bacteria. The treatments were performed on Col-0 and Col-6 wild type plants. Additionally, two mutants defective in the JA signaling pathway were used to select for JA-induced effects. coi1-1 (coronatine-insensitive) is known to lack the F-box protein COI1 and shows decreased sensitivity to JA application compared to wild type plants.⁵ The aos mutant, in contrast, is unable to produce JA following mechanical wounding as the biosynthesis of the rate-limiting enzyme allene oxide synthase is blocked.⁶Upon mechanical wounding of two leaves with sterile tweezers, JA concentration in the seedlings increased and root growth decreased rapidly, but only very transiently in all four investigated A. thaliana lines. In contrast to the situation in N. attenuata, root growth in A. thaliana recovered to pre-treatment levels within a few hours (Fig. 1B) and growth was not further decreased upon addition of oral secretions of Spodoptera littoralis larvae. This suggests that the observed short-term growth reduction was caused by hydraulic decrease of the plant growth potential. A slight, but continuous decrease of root growth during the day was noted both in wounded and in control plants that were not completely protected from ambient light in the transparent Petri dishes. When root systems were completely protected from ambient light by shading, root growth was almost steady throughout 24 h (Fig. 1B).In another experimental approach to clarify the connection between JA signaling and root growth reduction, we infected leaves with the avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 avrRpt2 strain. Upon mechanical wounding and application of bacterial suspension in order to facilitate infection, root growth decreased more rapidly than upon mere wounding. In the course of two days after infection, v_Tip was lower in the wild types and the aos mutant suggesting that JA was not the major reason of the decrease of root growth. With Pst DC3000 deficient in coronatine biosynthesis, it was verified that the bacterial toxin was the major reason of the root growth reduction following Pst infection. Using the ethylene reception blocker 1-methyl cyclopropene (1-MCP), ethylene was also figured out to be involved in coronatine-mediated root growth impairment in Arabidopsis. Thus, root growth of Arabidopsis is more sensitive to ethylene than to JA which is very different to observations on N. attenuata.The conclusion has to be drawn that elicitation of JA-bursts in the leaves of A. thaliana does not induce the same root growth reactions as in N. attenuata, although roots of both species react towards MeJA externally applied to the cultivation medium. This in turn demonstrates clearly that the interpretation of the JA signal differs between species. Possibly, this reflects different survival strategies to which the two investigated annual rosette species have evolved. While N. attenuata uses the root as a safe retreat for resources allowing later re-growth after the herbivore threat has passed by, A. thaliana is more successful in its ecological niche if it does not slow down growth in response to herbivory but continues its development as rapidly as possible.     

New insights into the signaling pathways controlling defense gene expression in rice roots during the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

Mycorrhizal fungi form a mutualistic relationship with the roots of most plant species. This association provides the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus with sugars while the fungus improves the uptake of water and mineral nutrients in the host plant. Moreover, the induction of defense gene expression in mycorrhizal roots has been described. While salicylic acid (SA)-regulated Pathogenesis-Related (PR) proteins accumulate in rice roots colonized by the AM fungus G. intraradices , the SA content is not significantly altered in the mycorrhizal roots. Sugars, in addition to being a source of carbon for the fungus, might act as signals for the control of defense gene expression. We hypothesize that increased demands for sugars by the fungus might be responsible for the activation of the host defense responses which will then contribute to the stabilization of root colonization by the AM fungus. An excessive root colonization might change a mutualistic association into a parasitic association.Key words: Glomus intraradices, glucose, fructose, Oryza sativa, pathogenesis-related (PR), salicylic acid (SA), sucrose, sugarsThe arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are obligate biotrophs that establish mutualistic associations with the roots of over 90% of all plant species. AM fungi improve the uptake of water and mineral nutrients in the host plant, mainly phosphorus and nitrogen, in exchange for sugars generated from photosynthesis. The benefits of the AM symbiosis on plant fitness are largely known, including increased ability to cope with biotic and abiotic stresses.^1,2 In fact, the amount of carbon allocated to mycorrhizal roots might be up 20% of the total photosynthate income.³ During root colonization, the AM fungus penetrates into the root through the epidermal cells and colonizes the cortex. In the root cortical cells, the fungus forms highly branched structures, called arbuscules, which are the site of the major nutrient exchange between the two symbionts.^4,5 The legumes Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus have been widely adopted as the reference species for studies of the AM symbiosis. Cereal crops and rice in particular are also able to establish symbiotic associations with AM fungi.^6,7 Arabidopsis thaliana, the model system for functional genomics in plants, has no mycorrhization ability.It is also well known that plants have evolved inducible defense systems to protect themselves from pathogen invasion. Challenge with a pathogen activates a complex variety of defense reactions that includes the rapid generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), changes in ion fluxes across the plasma membrane, cell wall reinforcement and production of antimicrobial compounds (e.g., phytoalexins).⁸ One of the most frequently observed biochemical events following pathogen infection is the accumulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins.⁹ For some PR proteins antimicrobial activities have been described (e.g., chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases, thionins or defensins). The plant responses to pathogen attack are activated both locally and systemically. The phytohormones salicyclic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and abscisic acid (ABA) act as defense signaling molecules for the activation of defense responses.¹⁰ Whereas SA-dependent signaling often provides resistance to biotrophic pathogens, JA/ET-dependent signaling is effective against necrotrophic pathogens.¹¹ During plant-pathogen interactions, cross-talk between SA and JA/ET signaling pathways provides the plant with the opportunity to prioritize one pathway over another to efficiently fine-tune its defense response to the invading pathogen. Contrary to biotrophic pathogens which exhibit a high degree of host specificity, the AM fungi manage to colonize a broad range of plant species.Evidence also exists on the existence of common mechanisms and signaling pathways governing responses to AM and pathogenic fungi.^2,12,13 Alterations in the content of hormones acting as defense signals also appear to occur during the AM symbiosis. As an example, JA and its derivatives (jasmonates) are believed to play an important role during the AM symbiosis in M. truncatula or tomato plants.^14,15 However, controversial data exists in the literature concerning the involvement of the various defense-related hormones during AM functioning. In particular, our current understanding of SA signaling during AM symbiosis is not clear.We recently documented the symbiotic proteome of the rice roots during their interaction with the AM fungus Glomus intraradices.⁶ A majority of the proteins identified in the rice symbiotic proteome are proteins with a function in defense responses or sugar metabolism. Among the proteins that accumulated at high levels in mycorrhizal rice roots compared to non mycorrhizal roots were PR proteins belonging to different PR families, such as PR1, chitinases (PR3), PR5 and several PR10 proteins. The PR1 and PBZ1 (a member of the PR10 family of PR proteins) genes are considered markers of the activation of defense responses in rice plants.^16,17 Of interest, the expression of many of the AM-regulated PR genes was previously reported to be induced by SA.^16,18–20 Proteins acting as oxidative stress protectors, such as ascorbate peroxidases, peroxidases and glutathione-S-transferases, also accumulated in mycorrhizal rice roots. Together, these observations support that the plant''s immune system is activated in the mycorrhizal rice root.To gain further insights into the molecular mechanisms governing PR gene expression in mycorrhizal roots, the SA and sugar contents of mycorrhizal roots were determined. Towards this end, rice (Oryza sativa ssp. japonica cv. Senia) plants were inoculated with the AM fungus G. intraradices.⁶ At 42 days post-inoculation (dpi), the overall colonization of the rice roots ranged from 25 to 30% as judged by microscopical observations of trypan blue-stained roots (results not shown; similar results were reported previously in reference ⁶). By this time, all the events related to fungal development, namely intraradical hyphae, arbuscules at different morphological stages of formation and vesicles, were present in G. intraradices-inoculated roots, thus confirming the establishment of the symbiotic association in the rice roots.Knowing that many AM-regulated proteins are also regulated by SA in rice roots, it was of interest to determine whether the level of endogenous SA increases in mycorrhizal roots compared to non mycorrhizal roots. In plants, intracellular SA is found predominantly as free SA and its sugar conjugate SA-glucoside (SAG). Root samples were analyzed for SA content, by measuring the level of both free SA and SAG as previously described in reference ²¹. This analysis revealed no significant differences, neither in free nor in SAG, between mycorrhizal and non mycorrhizal roots (Fig. 1). Then, it appears that although the expression of PR genes (functioning in a SA-dependent manner) is activated during the AM symbiosis, the fungus G. intraradices do not exploit the SA-mediated signaling pathway for induction of PR genes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1SA content, free SA and SA-glucoside (SAG) conjugate, in roots of mock-inoculated (−Gi) and G. intraradices-inoculated (+Gi) rice plants. SA determination was carried out at 42 days post-inoculation with G. intraradices. Three independent biological samples and three replicates per biological sample were used for quantification of SA. Two out of the three samples were the same ones used for the characterization of the symbiotic proteome in which the accumulation of SA-regulated PR genes was observed in reference ⁶. FW, fresh weight. Bars represent the means ± standard error.On the other hand, a direct link between sugar metabolism and the plant defense response has been established, including the phenomenon of high sugarmediated resistance and the finding that various key PR genes are induced by sugars. Transgenic approaches that lead to alterations in photoassimilate partitioning, either sucrose or hexoses, also alter PR gene expression.^22,23 In other studies, a SA-independent induction of PR genes by soluble sugars, sucrose, glucose and fructose, was reported in reference ²⁴.Sucrose, the main form of assimilated carbon during photosynthesis, is transported to the root tissues via the phloem where it becomes available to the root cells. As previously mentioned, characterization of the rice symbiotic proteome revealed alterations in the accumulation of proteins involved in sugar metabolism, such as enzymes involved in glucolysis/gluconeogenesis (e.g., fructose-1,6-bisphophate aldolase, enolase) or in pentose interconversions (e.g., UDP-glucose dehydrogenase).⁶ Because the plant provides sugars to the fungus, it is not surprising to find alterations in enzymes involved in sugar metabolism in the mycorrhizal roots. Evidence also supports that AM fungi acquire hexoses from the host cell and transform it into trehalose and glycogen, the typical sugars in the fungus.²⁵ Utilization of sucrose then requires hydrolysis in the plant cell which can be performed by sucrose synthase, producing UDP-glucose and fructose or invertases, producing glucose and fructose. Along with this, increased activities of invertases and sucrose synthases or increased expression of their corresponding genes, have been described during AM symbiotic interactions.^26,27 Very recently, the MtSucS1 sucrose synthase gene was reported to be essential for the establishment and maintenance of the AM symbiosis in Medicago truncatula.²⁸ In this context, we decided to explore whether colonization by G. intraradices has an effect on the accumulation of soluble sugars in rice roots.Sucrose, glucose and fructose content were measured enzymatically²³ in the rice roots at 42 days post-inoculation with G. intraradices . A tendency to a higher sucrose level was observed in mycorrhizal roots compared to non-mycorrhizal roots (Fig. 2). Concerning the hexose content, the mycorrhizal roots had a significantly lower hexose, both glucose and fructose levels, compared to non-mycorrhizal roots (p ≤ 0.05, Fig. 2). This finding is in agreement with results reported by other authors indicating that the fungal symbiont takes up and uses hexoses within the root.^29,30 The observation that the sucrose content is not significantly affected by mycorrhiza functioning, indicates that the host cell is able to sense sucrose concentration in order to maintain it at sufficient but constant levels to satisfy the demand for sugars by the fungal symbiont.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Sugar content in roots of rice plants inoculated with G. intraradices (+Gi) or mock-inoculated (−Gi). (A) Sucrose content. (B) Glucose content. (C) Fructose content. Measurements were made at 42 days post-inoculation with G. intraradices. Bars represent the means ± standard error.Clearly, the outcome of the AM symbiosis is an overall improvement of the fitness of both partners: the plant supplies the fungus with photosynthates whereas the fungus delivers nutrients from the soil to the host plant. Variations in the extent of colonization of the AM fungi will impose different carbon demands on the plants. However, a high demand of photosynthates by the mycorrhizal root might result in increased mycorrhization which, in turn, might be detrimental for the host plant. The rate of colonization and the amount of fungal biomass must then be tightly controlled by the host plant. We postulate that an increased sink strength by AM colonization might result in transient and/or localized increases in sugar concentrations in the root cell which might be the signal for the activation of defense gene expression. A schematic representation of plant responses associated with increased demands for sugars and deployment of defense responses is shown in Figure 3. According to this model, sugars might play a dual role during the AM symbiosis: (1) sugars are transferred from the plant to the fungus in exchange of mineral nutrients and (2) sugars alter host gene expression, leading to the activation of defense-related genes. This will allow the host plant to avoid an excessive root colonization by the AM fungus that might cause negative effects on the plant''s fitness. A complex exchange and interplay of signals between plant roots and AM fungi must then operate during functioning of the AM symbiosis for coordination of joint nutrient resource explotation strategies and control of the plant''s immune system. During evolution, co-adaptation between the two symbionts, the AM fungi and the host plant, must have occurred for stabilization of mycorrhizal cooperation and optimal functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Proposed model for a sugar mediated-activation of defense-related genes in mycorrhizal roots. In the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, the fungal symbiont colonizes root cortical cells, where it establishes differentiated hyphae called arbuscules. Arbuscules are the site of mineral nutrient transfer to the plant and the site of carbon acquisition by the fungus. Although arbuscules form within the root cortical cells, they remain separated from the plant cell cytoplasm by a plant-derived membrane, the periarbuscular membrane. In this way, an interface is created between the plant and fungal cells which appears to be optimal for nutrient transfer. Sucrose is transported through the phloem into the root. In the root cell, sucrose is hydrolyzed by host invertase and sucrose synthase activities before uptake by the AM fungus. Hexose uptake at the plant-fungus interfase might be passive with a concentration gradient maintained by rapid conversion of hexoses taken up by the fungus to trehalose and glycogen. Active mechanisms might also operate for hexose transport processes between the host cell and the symbiont. Under conditions of a high demand for sugars by the AM fungus, transient increases in sugar content will occur in the root cells which would be the signal for the activation of the host defense responses. The host-produced defense compounds would stabilize the level of root colonization by the AM fungus. An excessive root colonization might change the mutualistic association into a parasitic one.     

Multiple signaling pathways control nitrogen-mediated root elongation in maize

Response of root system architecture to nutrient availability is an essential way for plants to adapt to soil environments. Nitrogen can affect root development either as a result of changes in the external concentration, or through changes in the internal nutrient status of the plant. Low soil N stimulates root elongation in maize. Recent evidence suggests that plant hormones auxin and cytokinin, as well as NO signaling pathway, are involved in the regulation of root elongation by low nitrogen nutrition.Key words: nitrogen, root growth, auxin, cytokinin, NONitrogen acquisition is determined by N demand for plant growth. At low N stress, N demand for maximum plant growth rate is not matched by plant N uptake. To acquire adequate N, plants may increase root length density to explore a larger soil volume and/or increase N uptake activity. High root density is also an important root trait for competition with soil microorganisms.¹ Since nitrate is a highly mobile, non-adsorbing ion, theoretic analysis predicts that its uptake is not limited by transport through soil, and a small root system is sufficient for nitrate acquisition.^2–4 In field conditions, however, genotypes that are efficient in N acquisition generally had a larger root system and higher root length density.^5,6 Under conditions of insufficient N supply, N mass flow to roots may not be adequate to meet the N demand for plant growth. Even in N-sufficient soils, various soil constraints (low water content, etc) may reduce the N mass flow rate. In these cases, large root size and high density will be very important for the utilization of the spatially distributed N, especially newly mineralized N, and the competition for organic N with soil microorganisms.^7,8The development of lateral roots in Arabidopsis in response to nitrate supply has been widely studied.⁹ Less attention has been paid to primary root growth in response to N, possibly because root elongtion is insensitive to increased N supply in Arabidopsis.^10,11 In maize, however, root elongation was sigificantly promoted by suboptimal N supply, and inhibited by overdose supply of N (Fig. 1).^12,13 Until recently less is known about the underlying physiological mechansms. It is well documented that cytokinin is a root-to-shoot signal communicating N availability in addition to nitrate itself.¹⁴ Exogenous cytokinin application suppresses the elongation of primary roots.¹⁵ Recent work in Arabidopsis overexpressing cytokinin synthase (IPT) demonstrate that long-term CK overproduction inhibited primary root elongation by reducing quantitative parameters of primary root meristem.¹⁶ By comparing two maize inbred lines whose root elongation had a differential response to low N stress, it was found that the change of cytokinin content in roots was closely related to low-N induced root elongation.¹³ In the N-sensitive genotype 478, cytokinin (Zeatin + Zeatin riboside) content was significantly lower at low N condition. While in N-insensitive genotype Wu312, cytokinin content was hardly affected at various N supplies. Higher N supply shortened the distance from root apex to the first visible lateral roots, a phenomenen similar to that caused by exogenous cytokinins. Furthermore, exogenous cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) completely reversed the stimulatory effect of low nitrate on root elongation. All the data suggests that the inhibitory effect of high concentration of nitrate on root elongation is, at least in part, mediated by increased cytokinin level in roots.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Root elongation is inhibited at high nitrate supply.Auxin regulates many cellular responses crucial for plant development. Auxin plays a key role in establishing and elaborating patterns in root meristems.^17,18 Root elongation of Arabidopsis is enhanced by exogenous auxin at low concentrations, but is inhibited at high concentrations.¹⁹ In an earlier report, a high external nitrate supply (8 mM) did cause a 70% decrease in the auxin concentration of the root in soybean.²⁰ In maize, inhibition of root growth by high nitrate was found closely related to the reduction of IAA levels in roots and exogenous NAA and IAA restored primary root growth in high nitrate concentrations.²¹ Interesting, it was found that auxin concentrations in phloem exudates were reduced by a greater nitrate supply, suggesting that shoot-to-root auxin transport may be inhibited by high N supply. Considering the antagonism between auxin and cytokinin.²² it was possible that, by increasing the cytokinin level and decreasing the auxin level, high nitrate supply may have negative influences on root apex activity so that root apical dominance is weakened and, therefore, root elongation is suppressed and lateral roots grow closer to the root apex.Nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as an important messenger molecule associated with many biochemical and physiological processes in plants. The involvement of NO in IAA-induced adventitious root development has also been reported.²³ Given that nitrate is a substrate for NR-catalysed NO production, and root development and growth are closely related to NO, it is expected that NO may play a role in nitrate-dependent root growth. Surprisingly, endogenous levels of NO in the root apices of maize seedlings grown in high nitrate solution were much lower than those in apices grown in low nitrate. The nitrate-induced inhibition of root elongation in maize was markedly reversed by treatments of the roots with a NO donor (SNP) and IAA.²⁴ These data suggest that the arrest of root elongation by high levels of external nitrate concentrations may result from an alteration of endogenous NO levels in root apical cells. NR mediated NO production is unlikely to be involved in the nitrate-dependent NO production and root elongation because NR activity is lower at low N supply. A NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor reduced root elongation in maize plants grown in the low-nitrate medium, suggest that NOS activity may be inhibited in plants grown in high-nitrate solution, thus leading to a reduction of the endogenous NO levels.Taken together, high nitrogen supply increases cytokinin level, but decreases auxin and NO levels in roots of maize. Besides, it was well documented ethylene has a negative effect on root elongation of various plants.^25–27 Exogenous supply of cytokinin increase ethylene production (Stenlid 1982; Bertell et al., 1990). Recently, it was demonstrated in Arabidopsis that auxin transport from the root apex via the lateral root cap is required for ethylene-mediated inhibition of root growth.²⁸ Therefore, a complex multiple siganlling pathways may be involved in N-mediated root elongation (Fig. 2). Further study is required to understand how these pathways interact with each other to reduce root elongation in response to high nitrate supply.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A simplified model explaining nitogen-mediated root elongation in maize.