Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1- and myosin X-dependent manner

The orientation of mitotic spindles is tightly regulated in polarized cells, but it has been unclear whether there is a mechanism regulating spindle orientation in nonpolarized cells. Here we show that integrin-dependent cell adhesion to the substrate orients the mitotic spindle of nonpolarized cultured cells parallel to the substrate plane. The spindle is properly oriented in cells plated on fibronectin or collagen, but misoriented in cells on poly-L-lysine or treated with the RGD peptide or anti-beta1-integrin antibody, indicating requirement of integrin-mediated cell adhesion for this mechanism. Remarkably, this mechanism is independent of gravitation or cell-cell adhesion, but requires actin cytoskeleton and astral microtubules. Furthermore, myosin X and the microtubule plus-end-tracking protein EB1 are shown to play a role in this mechanism through remodeling of actin cytoskeleton and stabilization of astral microtubules, respectively. Our results thus uncover the existence of a mechanism that orients the spindle parallel to the cell-substrate adhesion plane, and identify crucial factors involved in this novel mechanism.     

Cadherin Adhesion Receptors Orient the Mitotic Spindle during Symmetric Cell Division in Mammalian Epithelia

Oriented cell division is a fundamental determinant of tissue organization. Simple epithelia divide symmetrically in the plane of the monolayer to preserve organ structure during epithelial morphogenesis and tissue turnover. For this to occur, mitotic spindles must be stringently oriented in the Z-axis, thereby establishing the perpendicular division plane between daughter cells. Spatial cues are thought to play important roles in spindle orientation, notably during asymmetric cell division. The molecular nature of the cortical cues that guide the spindle during symmetric cell division, however, is poorly understood. Here we show directly for the first time that cadherin adhesion receptors are required for planar spindle orientation in mammalian epithelia. Importantly, spindle orientation was disrupted without affecting tissue cohesion or epithelial polarity. This suggests that cadherin receptors can serve as cues for spindle orientation during symmetric cell division. We further show that disrupting cadherin function perturbed the cortical localization of APC, a microtubule-interacting protein that was required for planar spindle orientation. Together, these findings establish a novel morphogenetic function for cadherin adhesion receptors to guide spindle orientation during symmetric cell division.     

Automated tracking of mitotic spindle pole positions shows that LGN is required for spindle rotation but not orientation maintenance

Spindle orientation defines the plane of cell division and, thereby, the spatial position of all daughter cells. Here, we develop a live cell microscopy-based methodology to extract spindle movements in human epithelial cell lines and study how spindles are brought to a pre-defined orientation. We show that spindles undergo two distinct regimes of movements. Spindles are first actively rotated toward the cells’ long-axis and then maintained along this pre-defined axis. By quantifying spindle movements in cells depleted of LGN, we show that the first regime of rotational movements requires LGN that recruits cortical dynein. In contrast, the second regime of movements that maintains spindle orientation does not require LGN, but is sensitive to 2ME2 that suppresses microtubule dynamics. Our study sheds first insight into spatially defined spindle movement regimes in human cells, and supports the presence of LGN and dynein independent cortical anchors for astral microtubules.     

A default mechanism of spindle orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised Xenopus blastomeres

The process of oriented divisions of polarised cells is a recurrent mechanism of cell fate diversification in development. It is commonly assumed that a specialised mechanism of spindle alignment into the axis of polarity is a prerequisite for such systems to generate cell fate diversity. Oriented divisions also take place in the frog blastula, where orientation of the spindle into the apicobasal axis of polarised blastomeres generates inner and outer cells with different fates. Here, we show that, in this system, the spindle orients according to the shape of the cells, a mechanism often thought to be a default. We show that in the embryo, fatedifferentiative, perpendicular divisions correlate with a perpendicular long axis and a small apical surface, but the long axis rather then the size of the apical domain defines the division orientation. Mitotic spindles in rounded, yet polarised, isolated Xenopus blastula cells orient randomly, but align into an experimentally introduced long axis when cells are deformed early in the cell cycle. Unlike other systems of oriented divisions, the spindle aligns at prophase, rotation behaviour is rare and restricted to small angle adjustments. Disruption of astral microtubules leads to misalignment of the spindle. These results show that a mechanism of spindle orientation that depends on cell shape rather than cortical polarity can nevertheless generate cell fate diversity from a population of polarised cells.     

Interphase microtubules determine the initial alignment of the mitotic spindle

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interphase microtubules (MTs) position the nucleus [1, 2], which in turn positions the cell-division plane [1, 3]. It is unclear how the spindle orients, with respect to the predetermined division plane, to ensure that the chromosomes are segregated across this plane. It has been proposed that, during prometaphase, the astral MT interaction with the cell cortex aligns the spindle with the cell axis [4] and also participates in a spindle orientation checkpoint (SOC), which delays entry into anaphase as long as the spindle is misaligned [5-7]. Here, we trace the position of the spindle throughout mitosis in a single-cell assay. We find no evidence for the SOC. We show that the spindle is remarkably well aligned with the cell longitudinal axis at the onset of mitosis, by growing along the axis of the adjacent interphase MT. Misalignment of nascent spindles can give rise to anucleate cells when spindle elongation is impaired. We propose a new role for interphase microtubules: through interaction with the spindle pole body, interphase microtubules determine the initial alignment of the spindle in the subsequent cell division.     

Rotation and asymmetry of the mitotic spindle direct asymmetric cell division in the developing central nervous system

The asymmetric segregation of cell-fate determinants and the generation of daughter cells of different sizes rely on the correct orientation and position of the mitotic spindle. In the Drosophila embryo, the determinant Prospero is localized basally and is segregated equally to daughters of similar cell size during epidermal cell division. In contrast, during neuroblast division Prospero is segregated asymmetrically to the smaller daughter cell. This simple switch between symmetric and asymmetric segregation is achieved by changing the orientation of cell division: neural cells divide in a plane perpendicular to that of epidermoblast division. Here, by labelling mitotic spindles in living Drosophila embryos, we show that neuroblast spindles are initially formed in the same axis as epidermal cells, but rotate before cell division. We find that daughter cells of different sizes arise because the spindle itself becomes asymmetric at anaphase: apical microtubules elongate, basal microtubules shorten, and the midbody moves basally until it is positioned asymmetrically between the two spindle poles. This observation contradicts the widely held hypothesis that the cleavage furrow is always placed midway between the two centrosomes.     

The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis

The cell division axis determines the future positions of daughter cells and is therefore critical for cell fate. The positioning of the division axis has been mostly studied in systems such as embryos or yeasts, in which cell shape is well defined. In these cases, cell shape anisotropy and cell polarity affect spindle orientation. It remains unclear whether cell geometry or cortical cues are determinants for spindle orientation in mammalian cultured cells. The cell environment is composed of an extracellular matrix (ECM), which is connected to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton via transmembrane proteins. We used micro-contact printing to control the spatial distribution of the ECM on the substrate and demonstrated that it has a role in determining the orientation of the division axis of HeLa cells. On the basis of our analysis of the average distributions of actin-binding proteins in interphase and mitosis, we propose that the ECM controls the location of actin dynamics at the membrane, and thus the segregation of cortical components in interphase. This segregation is further maintained on the cortex of mitotic cells and used for spindle orientation.     

Epithelial polarity and spindle orientation: intersecting pathways

During asymmetric stem cell divisions, the mitotic spindle must be correctly oriented and positioned with respect to the axis of cell polarity to ensure that cell fate determinants are appropriately segregated into only one daughter cell. By contrast, epithelial cells divide symmetrically and orient their mitotic spindles perpendicular to the main apical–basal polarity axis, so that both daughter cells remain within the epithelium. Work in the past 20 years has defined a core ternary complex consisting of Pins, Mud and Gαi that participates in spindle orientation in both asymmetric and symmetric divisions. As additional factors that interact with this complex continue to be identified, a theme has emerged: there is substantial overlap between the mechanisms that orient the spindle and those that establish and maintain apical–basal polarity in epithelial cells. In this review, we examine several factors implicated in both processes, namely Canoe, Bazooka, aPKC and Discs large, and consider the implications of this work on how the spindle is oriented during epithelial cell divisions.     

Unequal first cleavage in the Tubifex egg: involvement of a monastral mitotic apparatus

The first cleavage in the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex hattai is unequal and meridional, and produces a smaller cell AB and a larger cell CD. This study traces the process of furrow formation, reorganization of cortical F-actin and the assembly of a mitotic apparatus during this unequal division. Cleavage furrow formation consists of two stages: (i) when eggs are viewed from the animal pole, meridionally running furrows emerge at two points of the egg's equator that are 90° apart from each other and approach the egg axis as they deepen; and (ii) at the midpoint between the equator and the egg center, the bottoms of these furrows link to each other on the animal and vegetal surfaces of the egg and form a continuous ring of constriction in a plane parallel to the egg axis. Egg cortices, isolated during the first step and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin, show that the bottoms of recently formed furrows are underlaid by a belt of tightly packed actin bundles (i.e. a contractile arc). The transition to the second stage of furrow formation coincides with the conversion of these actin belts into a continuous ring of F-actin. Whole-mount immunocytochemistry of microtubules reveals that the first cleavage in Tubifex involves an asymmetric mitotic spindle, which initially possesses an aster at one pole but not the other. This ‘monastral’ spindle is located at the egg's center and orients itself perpendicular to the egg axis. During anaphase, astral rays elongate to reach the cell surface, so that the array of astral microtubules in the plane of the egg's equator covers a sector of 270–300°. In contrast, it is not until the transition to telophase that microtubules emanating from the anastral spindle pole approach the cell margin. If eggs are compressed along the egg axis or forced to elongate, they form monastral spindles and divide unequally. In living compressed eggs, mitotic spindles, which are recognizable as bright streaks at the egg's center, appear not to shift their position along the spindle axis during division, suggesting that without eccentric migration of spindles Tubifex eggs are able to divide unequally. These results suggest that mechanisms that translocate the mitotic spindle eccentrically do not operate in Tubifex eggs during the first cell cycle. The mechanisms that generate asymmetry in spindle organization are discussed in the light of the present results.     

Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5

Monastrol, a cell-permeable small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5, arrests cells in mitosis with monoastral spindles. Here, we use monastrol to probe mitotic mechanisms. We find that monastrol does not inhibit progression through S and G2 phases of the cell cycle or centrosome duplication. The mitotic arrest due to monastrol is also rapidly reversible. Chromosomes in monastrol-treated cells frequently have both sister kinetochores attached to microtubules extending to the center of the monoaster (syntelic orientation). Mitotic arrest-deficient protein 2 (Mad2) localizes to a subset of kinetochores, suggesting the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint in these cells. Mad2 localizes to some kinetochores that have attached microtubules in monastrol-treated cells, indicating that kinetochore microtubule attachment alone may not satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint. Monastrol also inhibits bipolar spindle formation in Xenopus egg extracts. However, it does not prevent the targeting of Eg5 to the monoastral spindles that form. Imaging bipolar spindles disassembling in the presence of monastrol allowed direct observations of outward directed forces in the spindle, orthogonal to the pole-to-pole axis. Monastrol is thus a useful tool to study mitotic processes, detection and correction of chromosome malorientation, and contributions of Eg5 to spindle assembly and maintenance.     

Spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces

Proper spatial control of the cell division plane is essential to any developing organism. In most cell types, the relative size of the two daughter cells is determined by the position of the mitotic spindle within the geometry of the mother cell. We review the underlying mechanisms responsible for positioning of the mitotic spindle, both in cases where the spindle is placed in the center of the cell and in cases where the spindle is placed away from the center of the cell. We discuss the idea that cortical pulling forces are sufficient to provide a general mechanism for spindle positioning within symmetrically and asymmetrically dividing cells.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Cell shape impacts on the positioning of the mitotic spindle with respect to the substratum

All known mechanisms of mitotic spindle orientation rely on astral microtubules. We report that even in the absence of astral microtubules, metaphase spindles in MDCK and HeLa cells are not randomly positioned along their x-z dimension, but preferentially adopt shallow β angles between spindle pole axis and substratum. The nonrandom spindle positioning is due to constraints imposed by the cell cortex in flat cells that drive spindles that are longer and/or wider than the cell''s height into a tilted, quasidiagonal x-z position. In rounder cells, which are taller, fewer cortical constraints make the x-z spindle position more random. Reestablishment of astral microtubule–mediated forces align the spindle poles with cortical cues parallel to the substratum in all cells. However, in flat cells, they frequently cause spindle deformations. Similar deformations are apparent when confined spindles rotate from tilted to parallel positions while MDCK cells progress from prometaphase to metaphase. The spindle disruptions cause the engagement of the spindle assembly checkpoint. We propose that cell rounding serves to maintain spindle integrity during its positioning.     

Dual Role of Cdc42 in Spindle Orientation Control of Adherent Cells

The spindle orientation is regulated by the interaction of astral microtubules with the cell cortex. We have previously shown that spindles in nonpolarized adherent cells are oriented parallel to the substratum by an actin cytoskeleton- and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P3]-dependent mechanism. Here, we show that Cdc42, a Rho family of small GTPases, has an essential role in this mechanism of spindle orientation by regulating both the actin cytoskeleton and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Knockdown of Cdc42 suppresses PI(3)K activity in M phase and induces spindle misorientation. Moreover, knockdown of Cdc42 disrupts the cortical actin structures in metaphase cells. Our results show that p21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2), a target of Cdc42 and/or Rac1, plays a key role in regulating actin reorganization and spindle orientation downstream from Cdc42. Surprisingly, PAK2 regulates spindle orientation in a kinase activity-independent manner. βPix, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac1 and Cdc42, is shown to mediate this kinase-independent function of PAK2. This study thus demonstrates that spindle orientation in adherent cells is regulated by two distinct pathways downstream from Cdc42 and uncovers a novel role of the Cdc42-PAK2-βPix-actin pathway for this mechanism.Alignment of the mitotic spindles with a predetermined axis, which confines the plane of cell division, occurs in many types of cells and is crucial for morphogenesis and embryogenesis. Cell geometry (30, 32, 47), cell polarity (6, 24, 35), and cell-cell adhesions (20, 22, 48) are proposed to be the determinants for the axis of the spindles. In most cases, spindle alignment along the predetermined axis requires both astral microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton and is believed to involve dynein-dependent microtubule pulling forces functioning at the cell cortex (4, 12, 31).We have previously shown that in nonpolarized adherent cells, such as HeLa cells, integrin-mediated cell-substrate adhesion orients the spindles parallel to the substratum, which ensures that both daughter cells remain attached to the substrate after cell division (42). This mechanism requires the actin cytoskeleton, astral microtubules, the microtubule plus-end-tracking protein EB1, and myosin X. Furthermore, our recent study has shown that the lipid second messenger phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P3] is also essential to this mechanism. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 is accumulated in the midcortex of metaphase cells, which is important for the localized accumulation of dynactin, a dynein-binding partner, at the midcortex. We have proposed that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 directs dynein/dynactin-dependent pulling forces on the spindle to the midcortex and orients the spindle parallel to the substratum (43). However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the actin cytoskeleton and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 in the spindle orientation control remain unknown.The Rho family of GTPases, including Rho, Rac, and Cdc42, plays central roles in the regulation of not only the actin cytoskeleton but also microtubules in the control of various activities of cell motility, including cell adhesion, cell migration, and cell cycle progression (9, 33, 41). Rho family GTPases are also reported to regulate several mitotic events. RhoA plays a crucial role in contractile ring function and localizes to the cleavage furrow along with its effectors, ROCK, citron kinase, and mDia, during cytokinesis (18, 11). Cdc42 and its effector, mDia3, are reported to regulate the alignment of chromosomes during prometaphase and metaphase (49). Interestingly, Cdc42 is also required for proper spindle positioning in polarized cells such as budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Caenorhabditis elegans one-cell stage embryos, and mouse oocytes, which undergo asymmetric cell division (1, 23, 13, 28). However, how Cdc42 regulates spindle orientation and whether it has a role in spindle orientation in nonpolarized cells remain unknown.Here, we show that Cdc42 is required for the mechanism that orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in nonpolarized adherent cells. Moreover, our results show that Cdc42 regulates both PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and the actin cytoskeleton through PI(3)K- and p21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2)/βPix-signaling pathways, respectively. Both pathways are required for the localized accumulation of dynein/dynactin complexes in the midcortex in metaphase cells and, thus, for the proper spindle orientation parallel to the substratum.     

A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos

Current models for cleavage plane determination propose that metaphase spindles are positioned and oriented by interactions of their astral microtubules with the cellular cortex, followed by cleavage in the plane of the metaphase plate [1, 2]. We show that in early frog and fish embryos, where cells are unusually large, astral microtubules in metaphase are too short to position and orient the spindle. Rather, the preceding interphase aster centers and orients a pair of centrosomes prior to nuclear envelope breakdown, and the spindle assembles between these prepositioned centrosomes. Interphase asters center and orient centrosomes with dynein-mediated pulling forces. These forces act before astral microtubules contact the cortex; thus, dynein must pull from sites in the cytoplasm, not the cell cortex as is usually proposed for smaller cells. Aster shape is determined by interactions of the expanding periphery with the cell cortex or with an interaction zone that forms between sister-asters in telophase. We propose a model to explain cleavage plane geometry in which the length of astral microtubules is limited by interaction with these boundaries, causing length asymmetries. Dynein anchored in the cytoplasm then generates length-dependent pulling forces, which move and orient centrosomes.     

Spindle position in symmetric cell divisions during epiboly is controlled by opposing and dynamic apicobasal forces

Orientation of cell division is a vital aspect of tissue morphogenesis and growth. Asymmetric divisions generate cell fate diversity and epithelial stratification, whereas symmetric divisions contribute to tissue growth, spreading, and elongation. Here, we describe a mechanism for positioning the spindle in symmetric cell divisions of an embryonic epithelium. We show that during the early stages of epiboly, spindles in the epithelium display dynamic behavior within the plane of the epithelium but are kept firmly within this plane to give a symmetric division. This dynamic stability relies on balancing counteracting forces: an apically directed force exerted by F-actin/myosin-2 via active cortical flow and a basally directed force mediated by microtubules and myosin-10. When both forces are disrupted, spindle orientation deviates from the epithelial plane, and epithelial surface is reduced. We propose that this dynamic mechanism maintains symmetric divisions while allowing the quick adjustment of division plane to facilitate even tissue spreading.     

The relation between cell size,chromosome length and the orientation of chromosomes in dividing root cortex cells

Cells in the root meristem are organised in longitudinal files. Repeated transverse cell divisions in these files are the prime cause of root growth. Because of the orientation of the cell divisions, we expected to find mitoses with an spindle axis parallel to the file axis. However, we observed in the root cortex ofVicia faba large number of oblique chromosome orientations. From metaphase to telophase there was a dramatic increase of the rotation of the spindle axis. Measurements of both the size of the cortex cells and the chromosome configurations indicated that most cells were too small for an orientation of the spindle parallel to the file axis. Space limitation force the spindle into an oblique position. Despite this spindle axis rotation, most daughter cells remained within the original cell file. Only in extremely flat cells did the position of the daughter nuclei forced the cell to set a plane of division parallel to the file axis, which result in side-by-side orientation of the daughter cells. Telophase spindle axis rotations are also observed inCrepis capillaris andPetunia hybrida.. These species have respectively medium and small sized chromosomes compared toVicia. Since space limitation, which causes the rotation, depends both on cell and chromosome size, the frequency and extent of the phenomenon in former two species is comparatively low.     

Orientation of the cleavage spindles in pulmonate mollusks. I. The role of the form of the blastomeres in 2d cleavage spindle orientation

In the normal two-celled embryos of various pulmonate molluscs, the orientation of spindles characteristic of metaanaphase is being frequently established gradually, in the process of transition from pro- to metaphase accompained by the growth of spindle and asters. The typical growth of contact zone between the blastomeres of the common pond snail embryos was inhibited to a different extent under their cultivation after the 1 cleavage division in the calcium-free media or after trypsinization. At the same time the orientation of meta-anaphase spindles was markedly affected (as judged by an angle alpha between the spindle axis and the plane of contact zone in the equatorial projection). When analyzing the model distributions of the angles between the two spindle axes (in the same projection), it was shown that the empirical distributions of these angles corresponded to the principle of stochastic combination of two alpha. A conclusion is drawn that the orientation of one spindle does not depend on that of another but the position of each of them depends on the size of the contact zone and, hence, on the general form of the adjacent blastomere region. Some other processes determining the spindle orientation are discussed.     

PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 regulates spindle orientation in adherent cells

Cultured adherent cells divide on the substratum, leading to formation of the cell monolayer. However, how the orientation of this anchorage-dependent cell division is regulated remains unknown. We have previously shown that integrin-dependent adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum, which ensures this anchorage-dependent cell division. Here, we show that phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P3) is essential for this spindle orientation control. In metaphase, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 is accumulated in the midcortex in an integrin-dependent manner. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K) reduces the accumulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and induces spindle misorientation. Introduction of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to these cells restores the midcortical accumulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and proper spindle orientation. PI(3)K inhibition causes dynein-dependent spindle rotations along the z-axis, resulting in spindle misorientation. Moreover, dynactin, a dynein-binding partner, is accumulated in the midcortex in a PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent manner. We propose that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 directs dynein/dynactin-dependent pulling forces on spindles to the midcortex, and thereby orients the spindle parallel to the substratum.     

PAR-dependent and geometry-dependent mechanisms of spindle positioning

During intrinsically asymmetric division, the spindle is oriented onto a polarized axis specified by a group of conserved PAR proteins. Extrinsic geometric asymmetry generated by cell shape also affects spindle orientation in some systems, but how intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms coexist without interfering with each other is unknown. In some asymmetrically dividing cells of the wild-type Caenorhabditis elegans embryo, nuclear rotation directed toward the anterior cortex orients the forming spindle. We find that in such cells, a PAR-dependent mechanism dominates and causes rotation onto the polarized axis, regardless of cell shape. However, when geometric asymmetry is removed, free nuclear rotation in the center of the cell is observed, indicating that the anterior-directed nature of rotation in unaltered embryos is an effect of cell shape. This free rotation is inconsistent with the prevailing model for nuclear rotation, the specialized cortical site model. In contrast, in par-3 mutant embryos, a geometry-dependent mechanism becomes active and causes directed nuclear rotation. These results lead to the model that in wild-type embryos both PAR-3 and PAR-2 are essential for nuclear rotation in asymmetrically dividing cells, but that PAR-3 inhibits geometry-dependent rotation in nonpolarized cells, thus preventing cell shape from interfering with spindle orientation.