Sulfhydryl groups are involved in the binding of agonists and antagonists to the human mineralocorticoid receptor

To investigate the role of sulfhydryl groups in the interaction of agonists and antagonists with the human mineralocorticoid receptor (hMR) the effect of methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS) on free and liganded-hMR was examined. hMR was expressed in insect cells (Sf9) using the baculovirus system. Treatment of cytosol with MMTS at 4°C inhibited the binding to hMR of both [³H]aldosterone and [³H]RU26752 (a synthetic aldosterone antagonist). At 4°C, the sensitivity to MMTS of the liganded-hMR complexes was dependent upon the nature of the ligands: agonists (aldosterone, corticosterone and cortisol) rendered the hMR resistant to MMTS, whereas antagonists (progesterone and RU26752) did not protect the receptor against MMTS inactivation. Analysis of the dose- and time-dependent effects of MMTS revealed that the free hMR and the RU26752-hMR complexes displayed a similar sensitivity to MMTS and that MMTS increased the dissociation of RU26752 from the hMR. At 4°C the aldosterone-hMR complexes were not affected by MMTS treatment, whereas at 20°C MMTS increased the dissociation of aldosterone from hMR. This effect was unrelated to the dissociation of hsp90 from hMR, because the sensitivity of the aldosterone-hMR complexes to MMTS remained unchanged after covalent linkage between hsp90 and the receptor. Our results suggest that agonists and antagonists modify the receptor conformation in distinct ways that render cysteine residues of the ligand binding domain more or less accessible to the MMTS action.     

Non-equivalence of Key Positively Charged Residues of the Free Fatty Acid 2 Receptor in the Recognition and Function of Agonist Versus Antagonist Ligands

Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced in the gut by bacterial fermentation of poorly digested carbohydrates. A key mediator of their actions is the G protein-coupled free fatty acid 2 (FFA2) receptor, and this has been suggested as a therapeutic target for the treatment of both metabolic and inflammatory diseases. However, a lack of understanding of the molecular determinants dictating how ligands bind to this receptor has hindered development. We have developed a novel radiolabeled FFA2 antagonist to probe ligand binding to FFA2, and in combination with mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies, we define how agonist and antagonist ligands interact with the receptor. Although both agonist and antagonist ligands contain negatively charged carboxylates that interact with two key positively charged arginine residues in transmembrane domains V and VII of FFA2, there are clear differences in how these interactions occur. Specifically, although agonists require interaction with both arginine residues to bind the receptor, antagonists require an interaction with only one of the two. Moreover, different chemical series of antagonist interact preferentially with different arginine residues. A homology model capable of rationalizing these observations was developed and provides a tool that will be invaluable for identifying improved FFA2 agonists and antagonists to further define function and therapeutic opportunities of this receptor.     

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

Discrimination between agonists and antagonists by the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid-selective glutamate receptor. A mutation analysis of the ligand-binding domain of GluR-D subunit

The crystal structures of the ligand-binding core of the agonist complexes of the glutamate receptor-B (GluR-B) subunit of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-selective glutamate receptor indicate that the distal anionic group of agonist molecules are stabilized by interactions with an N-terminal region of an alpha-helix (helix F) in the lobe 2 ("domain 2," Armstrong, N., and Gouaux, E. (2000) Neuron 28, 165-181) of the two-lobed ligand-binding domain. We used site-directed mutagenesis to further analyze the role of this region in the recognition of both agonists and antagonists by the AMPA receptor. Wild-type and mutated versions of the ligand-binding domain of GluR-D were expressed in insect cells as secreted soluble polypeptides and subjected to binding assays using [(3)H]AMPA, an agonist, and [(3)H]Ro 48-8587 (9-imidazol-1-yl-8-nitro-2,3,5,6-tetrahydro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c] quinazoline-2,5-dione), a high affinity AMPA receptor antagonist, as radioligands. Single alanine substitutions at residues Leu-672 and Thr-677 severely affected the affinities for all agonists, as seen in ligand competition assays, whereas similar mutations at residues Asp-673, Ser-674, Gly-675, Ser-676, and Lys-678 selectively affected the binding affinities of one or two of the agonists. In striking contrast, the binding affinities of [(3)H]Ro 48-8587 and of another competitive antagonist, 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, were not affected by any of these alanine mutations, suggesting the absence of critical side-chain interactions. Together with ligand docking experiments, our results indicate a selective engagement of the side chains of the helix F region in agonist binding, and suggest that conformational changes involving this region may play a critical role in receptor activation.     

The role of tyrosine at the ligand-binding site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Identification of the critical residues in a receptor's ligand-binding site provides valuable structural information important for understanding the basis for ligand recognition. The design of specific ligands targeted for receptor action will depend to a great extent on detailed structural knowledge of this kind. Although the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is perhaps the best characterized of all receptors, the detailed configuration of the ligand-binding site remains unknown. Structural comparisons of nicotinic agonists and antagonists have long predicted a negative subsite on the receptor to interact with the positively charged alkyl-ammonium moiety common to nearly all nicotinic agents. We have used intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopic analyses together with binding studies of selectively modified peptide fragments of the nAChR to suggest that one or two invariant tyrosine residues at positions 190 and 198 on the alpha-subunit provide the critical negative subsite required for ligand binding. Tyrosines may similarly be part of the negative subsite of muscarinic receptors and other neurotransmitter receptors that bind cationic ligands.     

Chemical modification of A1 adenosine receptors in rat brain membranes. Evidence for histidine in different domains of the ligand binding site

Chemical modification of amino acid residues was used to probe the ligand recognition site of A1 adenosine receptors from rat brain membranes. The effect of treatment with group-specific reagents on agonist and antagonist radioligand binding was investigated. The histidine-specific reagent diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) induced a loss of binding of the agonist R-N6-[3H] phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]PIA), which could be prevented in part by agonists, but not by antagonists. DEP treatment induced also a loss of binding of the antagonist [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX). Antagonists protected A1 receptors from this inactivation while agonists did not. This result provided evidence for the existence of at least 2 different histidine residues involved in ligand binding. Consistent with a modification of the binding site, DEP did not alter the affinity of [3H]DPCPX, but reduced receptor number. From the selective protection of [3H] PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding from inactivation, it is concluded that agonists and antagonists occupy different domains at the binding site. Sulfhydryl modifying reagents did not influence antagonist binding, but inhibited agonist binding. This effect is explained by modification of the inhibitory guanine nucleotide binding protein. Pyridoxal 5-phosphate inactivated both [3H]PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding, but the receptors could not be protected from inactivation by ligands. Therefore, no amino group seems to be located at the ligand binding site. In addition, it was shown that no further amino acids with polar side chains are present. The absence of hydrophilic amino acids from the recognition site of the receptor apart from histidine suggests an explanation for the lack of hydrophilic ligands with high affinity for A1 receptors.     

Determinants of antagonist binding at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR-D. Role of the conserved arginine 507 and glutamate 727 residues.

Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant alpha-amino and alpha-carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48-8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48-8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.     

The neurokinin-1 and neurokinin-2 receptor binding sites of MDL103,392 differ

Several small molecule non-peptide antagonists of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors have been developed. Mutational analysis of the receptor protein sequence has led to the conclusion that the binding site for these non-peptide antagonists lies within the bundle created by transmembrane domains IV–VII of the receptor and differs from the binding sites of peptide agonists and antagonists. The current investigation uses site-directed mutagenesis of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors to elucidate the amino acids that are important for binding and functional activity of the first potent dual NK-1/NK-2 antagonist MDL103,392. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-1 receptor are Gln-165, His-197, Leu-203, Ile-204, Phe-264, His-265 and Tyr-272. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-2 receptor are Gln-166, His-198, Tyr-266 and Tyr-289. While residues in transmembrane (TM) domains IV and V are important in both receptors (Gln-165/166 and His-197/198), residues in TM V and VI are more important for the NK-1 receptor and residues in TM VII play a more important role in the NK-2 receptor. These data are the first report of the analysis of the binding site of a dual tachykinin receptor antagonist and indicate that a single compound (MDL103,392) binds to each receptor in a different manner despite there being a high degree of homology in the transmembrane bundles. In addition, this is the first report in which a model for the binding of a non-peptide antagonist to the NK-2 receptor is proposed.     

Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations

Upon ligand binding at the subunit interfaces, the extracellular domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor undergoes conformational changes, and agonist binding allosterically triggers opening of the ion channel. The soluble acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) from snail has been shown to be a structural and functional surrogate of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor. Yet, individual AChBP species display disparate affinities for nicotinic ligands. The crystal structure of AChBP from Aplysia californica in the apo form reveals a more open loop C and distinctive positions for other surface loops, compared with previous structures. Analysis of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic ligands shows that loop C, which does not significantly change conformation upon binding of the antagonist, methyllycaconitine, further opens to accommodate the peptidic antagonist, alpha-conotoxin ImI, but wraps around the agonists lobeline and epibatidine. The structures also reveal extended and nonoverlapping interaction surfaces for the two antagonists, outside the binding loci for agonists. This comprehensive set of structures reflects a dynamic template for delineating further conformational changes of the LBD of the nicotinic receptor.     

Distinct agonist- and antagonist-binding sites on the glycine receptor.

The distinction between receptor-binding sites for agonists and antagonists underpins the pharmacological differences between these two classes of ligands. In the glycine receptor, antagonist (strychnine) binding requires an interaction with residues Lys-200 and Tyr-202. We now demonstrate that the agonist-binding site of this receptor is located at the residue Thr-204. The agonist-binding site interaction is thus likely to be mediated by hydrogen bonding and not by ionic interactions. Our results demonstrate that, in contrast to other studies of ligand-gated ion channel receptors, agonist- and antagonist-binding sites are composed of distinct amino acid residues.     

Specific recognition of androgens by their nuclear receptor. A structure-function study

Androgens, like progestins, are 3-ketosteroids with structural differences restricted to the 17beta substituent in the steroid D-ring. To better understand the specific recognition of ligands by the human androgen receptor (hAR), a homology model of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) was constructed based on the progesterone receptor LBD crystal structure. Several mutants of residues potentially involved in the specific recognition of ligands in the hAR were constructed and tested for their ability to bind agonists. Their transactivation capacity in response to agonist (R1881) and antagonists (cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, and ICI 176344) was also measured. Substitution of His(874) by alanine, only marginally impairs the ligand-binding and transactivation capacity of the hAR receptor. In contrast, mutations of Thr(877) and, to a greater extent, Asn(705) perturb ligand recognition, alter transactivation efficiency, and broaden receptor specificity. Interestingly, the N705A mutant acquires progesterone receptor (PR) properties for agonist ligands but, unlike wild type AR and PR, loses the capacity to repress transactivation with nonsteroidal antagonists. Models of the hAR.LBD complexes with several ligands are presented, which suggests new directions for drug design.     

Molecular interactions of nonpeptide agonists and antagonists with the melanocortin-4 receptor

The melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor is a potential therapeutic target for obesity and cachexia, for which nonpeptide agonists and antagonists are being developed, respectively. The aim of this study was to identify molecular interactions between the MC4 receptor and nonpeptide ligands, and to compare the mechanism of binding between agonist and antagonist ligands. Nonpeptide ligand interaction was affected by mutations that reduce peptide ligand binding (D122A, D126A, S190A, M200A, F261A, and F284A), confirming overlapping binding determinants for peptide and nonpeptide ligands. The common halogenated phenyl group of nonpeptide ligands was a determinant of F261A and F284A mutations' affinity-reducing effect, implying this group interacts with the aromatic side chains of these residues. All affected compounds contain this group, the mutations reduced binding of 2,4-dichloro-substituted compounds more than 4-chloro-substituted-compounds, and F284A mutation eliminated the affinity-enhancing effect of 2-chloro-substitution. F261A and F284A mutations reduced the affinity of antagonists more than agonists, suggesting that the stronger ligand interaction with these residues, the lower the ligand efficacy. Supporting this hypothesis, F261A mutation increased the efficacy of nonpeptide antagonist and partial agonist ligands. D122A and D126A mutations reduced nonpeptide ligand interaction. Removing the ligands' derivatized amide group eliminated the effect of the mutations. Interaction of agonists, which bear a common amine within this group, was strongly reduced by D126A mutation (550-3300-fold), suggesting an electrostatic interaction between the amine and the acidic group of D126. These postulated interactions with aromatic and acidic regions of the MC4 receptor are consistent with a molecular model of the receptor. Furthermore, the strength of interaction with the aromatic pocket, and potentially the acidic pocket, controls the signaling efficacy of the ligand.     

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of uncomplexed, 'agonist-bound' and 'antagonist-bound' alpha1A adrenoceptor models

Molecular dynamics simulations (2 ns) were conducted on a homology model of the alpha1A adrenoceptor complexed with agonists and antagonists to examine the various receptor conformations induced. These simulations yield insights into the binding site interactions of the active and inactive states of the receptor. Furthermore, our analysis allowed for the selection of candidate sites for future mutagenesis experiments such as of Glu-180, which may be important for antagonist binding. The interactions of conserved residues of the DRY motif in TM-III and the NPxxY motif in TM-VII in the alpha1A adrenoceptor complexes were also examined. The major differences lie in the role of residue Arg-124, which for the agonist complexes formed additional interactions with residues of intracellular loops I and II. Alternatively, for the antagonist complexes, additional interactions were observed for Asn-322 with residues of TM-II and TM-VII.     

Molecular Basis for Benzodiazepine Agonist Action at the Type 1 Cholecystokinin Receptor

Understanding the molecular basis of drug action can facilitate development of more potent and selective drugs. Here, we explore the molecular basis for action of a unique small molecule ligand that is a type 1 cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor agonist and type 2 CCK receptor antagonist, GI181771X. We characterize its binding utilizing structurally related radioiodinated ligands selective for CCK receptor subtypes that utilize the same allosteric ligand-binding pocket, using wild-type receptors and chimeric constructs exchanging the distinct residues lining this pocket. Intracellular calcium assays were performed to determine biological activity. Molecular models for docking small molecule agonists to the type 1 CCK receptor were developed using a ligand-guided refinement approach. The optimal model was distinct from the previous antagonist model for the same receptor and was mechanistically consistent with the current mutagenesis data. This study revealed a key role for Leu^7.39 that was predicted to interact with the isopropyl group in the N1 position of the benzodiazepine that acts as a “trigger” for biological activity. The molecular model was predictive of binding of other small molecule agonists, effectively distinguishing these from 1065 approved drug decoys with an area under curve value of 99%. The model also selectively enriched for agonist compounds, with 130 agonists identified by ROC analysis when seeded in 2175 non-agonist ligands of the type 1 CCK receptor (area under curve 78%). Benzodiazepine agonists in this series docked in consistent pose within this pocket, with a key role played by Leu^7.39, whereas the role of this residue was less clear for chemically distinct agonists.     

Chemical modification of cholecystokinin-A receptors in rat pancreatic membranes.

Chemical modification of amino acids was used to probe the molecular structure of the cholecystokinin-A (CCK-A) receptor on rat pancreatic membranes. Radioligand binding studies with [3H]N-(2,3-dihydro-1-methyl-2-oxo-5-phenyl-1H-1,4-benzodiazepin-3- yl)1H- 2-carboxamide [(+/-)-[3H]L-364,718], a tritiated highly potent CCK-A receptor antagonist, enabled the evaluation of the effects caused by the modifying reagents. The apparent fragility of the receptor protein necessitated the development of a modification procedure without wash and centrifugation steps. Treatment of a concentrated membrane preparation with the group-specific agents N-ethylmaleimide, phenylglyoxal and diethylpyrocarbonate, subsequent dilution and incubation at lower temperatures (20 degrees C instead of the more generally used 37 degrees C) proved successful. All modifiers affected the binding characteristics for both agonists and antagonists considerably. CCK-A receptor coupling to guanosine-nucleotide-binding proteins was substantially diminished upon modification with N-ethylmaleimide and diethylpyrocarbonate, as could be concluded from the effects on the (+/-)-[3H]L-364,718 displacement by the cholecystokinin C-terminal octapeptide (CCK-8). The ligand-binding site was affected by all three reagents, as could be inferred from the specific protection obtained with the CCK-A receptor antagonist, lorglumide. It therefore appears that sulfhydryl, arginyl, and histidyl residues form an essential part of the ligand-binding domain on the CCK-A receptor and that sulfhydryl and histidyl residues are also involved in the signal-transduction pathway.     

Binding of agonists and antagonists to the porcine adipose tissue β-adrenergic receptor(s)

1. Affinities of agonists for porcine adipose tissue β-adrenergic receptors, determined by competitive ligand binding with ³H-dihydroalprenolol to crude adipose tissue membranes in vitro, varied from 50 times > to 25 times < than isoproterenol. Affinities for antagonists varied from 8 times > to 1000 times < propranolol.2. Receptor affinity was not related to the ability to stimulate or inhibit lipolysis, or to the agonist or antagonist purported receptor subtype specificity.3. Modeling of ligand-binding data indicated more than one binding site for several ligands. The assignment of β-adrenergic subtypes to the individual binding sites was unclear because this would depend on the individual ligands used to establish binding sites.     

Mutagenesis and modeling of the GABAB receptor extracellular domain support a venus flytrap mechanism for ligand binding

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is distantly related to the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family of G-protein-coupled receptors (family 3). Sequence comparison revealed that, like metabotropic glutamate receptors, the extracellular domain of the two GABAB receptor splice variants possesses an identical region homologous to the bacterial periplasmic leucine-binding protein (LBP), but lacks the cysteine-rich region common to all other family 3 receptors. A three-dimensional model of the LBP-like domain of the GABAB receptor was constructed based on the known structure of LBP. This model predicts that four of the five cysteine residues found in this GABAB receptor domain are important for its correct folding. This conclusion is supported by analysis of mutations of these Cys residues and a decrease in the thermostability of the binding site after dithiothreitol treatment. Additionally, Ser-246 was found to be critical for CGP64213 binding. Interestingly, this residue aligns with Ser-79 of LBP, which forms a hydrogen bond with the ligand. The mutation of Ser-269 was found to differently affect the affinity of various ligands, indicating that this residue is involved in the selectivity of recognition of GABAB receptor ligands. Finally, the mutation of two residues, Ser-247 and Gln-312, was found to increase the affinity for agonists and to decrease the affinity for antagonists. Such an effect of point mutations can be explained by the Venus flytrap model for receptor activation. This model proposes that the initial step in the activation of the receptor by agonist results from the closure of the two lobes of the binding domain.