Formation of a stable RuvA protein double tetramer is required for efficient branch migration in vitro and for replication fork reversal in vivo

In bacteria, RuvABC is required for the resolution of Holliday junctions (HJ) made during homologous recombination. The RuvAB complex catalyzes HJ branch migration and replication fork reversal (RFR). During RFR, a stalled fork is reversed to form a HJ adjacent to a DNA double strand end, a reaction that requires RuvAB in certain Escherichia coli replication mutants. The exact structure of active RuvAB complexes remains elusive as it is still unknown whether one or two tetramers of RuvA support RuvB during branch migration and during RFR. We designed an E. coli RuvA mutant, RuvA2(KaP), specifically impaired for RuvA tetramer-tetramer interactions. As expected, the mutant protein is impaired for complex II (two tetramers) formation on HJs, although the binding efficiency of complex I (a single tetramer) is as wild type. We show that although RuvA complex II formation is required for efficient HJ branch migration in vitro, RuvA2(KaP) is fully active for homologous recombination in vivo. RuvA2(KaP) is also deficient at forming complex II on synthetic replication forks, and the binding affinity of RuvA2(KaP) for forks is decreased compared with wild type. Accordingly, RuvA2(KaP) is inefficient at processing forks in vitro and in vivo. These data indicate that RuvA2(KaP) is a separation-of-function mutant, capable of homologous recombination but impaired for RFR. RuvA2(KaP) is defective for stimulation of RuvB activity and stability of HJ·RuvA·RuvB tripartite complexes. This work demonstrates that the need for RuvA tetramer-tetramer interactions for full RuvAB activity in vitro causes specifically an RFR defect in vivo.     

The acidic pin of RuvA modulates Holliday junction binding and processing by the RuvABC resolvasome

Holliday junctions are four-way branched DNA structures formed during recombination, replication and repair. They are processed in Escherichia coli by the RuvA, RuvB and RuvC proteins. RuvA targets the junction and facilitates loading of RuvB helicase and RuvC endonuclease to form complexes that catalyse junction branch migration (RuvAB) and resolution (RuvABC). We investigated the role of RuvA in these reactions and in particular the part played by the acidic pin located on its DNA-binding surface. By making appropriate substitutions of two key amino acids (Glu55 and Asp56), we altered the charge on the pin and investigated how this affected junction binding and processing. We show that two negative charges on each subunit of the pin are crucial. They facilitate junction targeting by preventing binding to duplex DNA and also constrain branch migration by RuvAB in a manner critical for junction processing. These findings provide the first direct evidence that RuvA has a mechanistic role in branch migration. They also provide insight into the coupling of branch migration and resolution by the RuvABC resolvasome.     

Escherichia coli RuvBL268S: a mutant RuvB protein that exhibits wild-type activities in vitro but confers a UV-sensitive ruv phenotype in vivo.

The RuvABC proteins of Escherichia coli process recombination intermediates during genetic recombination and DNA repair. RuvA and RuvB promote branch migration of Holliday junctions, a process that extends heteroduplex DNA. Together with RuvC, they form a RuvABC complex capable of Holliday junction resolution. Branch migration by RuvAB is mediated by RuvB, a hexameric ring protein that acts as an ATP-driven molecular pump. To gain insight into the mechanism of branch migration, random mutations were introduced into the ruvB gene by PCR and a collection of mutant alleles were obtained. Mutation of leucine 268 to serine resulted in a severe UV-sensitive phenotype, characteristic of a ruv defect. Here, we report a biochemical analysis of the mutant protein RuvBL268S. Unexpectedly, the purified protein is fully active in vitro with regard to its ATPase, DNA binding and DNA unwinding activities. It also promotes efficient branch migration in combination with RuvA, and forms functional RuvABC-Holliday junction resolvase complexes. These results indicate that RuvB may perform some additional, and as yet undefined, function that is necessary for cell survival after UV-irradiation.     

Structure-function analysis of the three domains of RuvB DNA motor protein

RuvB protein forms two hexameric rings that bind to the RuvA tetramer at DNA Holliday junctions. The RuvAB complex utilizes the energy of ATP hydrolysis to promote branch migration of Holliday junctions. The crystal structure of RuvB from Thermus thermophilus (Tth) HB8 showed that each RuvB monomer has three domains (N, M, and C). This study is a structure-function analysis of the three domains of RuvB. The results show that domain N is involved in RuvA-RuvB and RuvB-RuvB subunit interactions, domains N and M are required for ATP hydrolysis and ATP binding-induced hexamer formation, and domain C plays an essential role in DNA binding. The side chain of Arg-318 is essential for DNA binding and may directly interact with DNA. The data also provide evidence that coordinated ATP-dependent interactions between domains N, M, and C play an essential role during formation of the RuvAB Holliday junction ternary complex.     

Functional interactions between the holliday junction resolvase and the branch migration motor of Escherichia coli.

Homologous recombination generates genetic diversity and provides an important cellular pathway for the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. Two key steps in this process are the branch migration of Holliday junctions followed by their resolution into mature recombination products. In E.coli, branch migration is catalysed by the RuvB protein, a hexameric DNA helicase that is loaded onto the junction by RuvA, whereas resolution is promoted by the RuvC endonuclease. Here we provide direct evidence for functional interactions between RuvB and RuvC that link these biochemically distinct processes. Using synthetic Holliday junctions, RuvB was found to stabilize the binding of RuvC to a junction and to stimulate its resolvase activity. Conversely, RuvC facilitated interactions between RuvB and the junction such that RuvBC complexes catalysed branch migration. The observed synergy between RuvB and RuvC provides new insight into the structure and function of a RuvABC complex that is capable of facilitating branch migration and resolution of Holliday junctions via a concerted enzymatic mechanism.     

Helicase-defective RuvB(D113E) promotes RuvAB-mediated branch migration in vitro.

In Escherichia coli, the RuvA and RuvB proteins interact at Holliday junctions to promote branch migration leading to the formation of heteroduplex DNA. RuvA provides junction-binding specificity and RuvB drives ATP-dependent branch migration. Since RuvB contains sequence motifs characteristic of a DNA helicase and RuvAB exhibit helicase activity in vitro, we have analysed the role of DNA unwinding in relation to branch migration. A mutant RuvB protein, RuvB(D113E), mutated in helicase motif II (the DExx box), has been purified to homogeneity. The mutant protein forms hexameric rings on DNA similar to those formed by wild-type protein and promotes branch migration in the presence of RuvA. However, RuvB(D113E) exhibits reduced ATPase activity and is severely compromised in its DNA helicase activity. Models for RuvAB-mediated branch migration that invoke only limited DNA unwinding activity are proposed.     

Functional significance of octameric RuvA for a branch migration complex from Thermus thermophilus

The RuvAB complex promotes migration of Holliday junction at the late stage of homologous recombination. The RuvA tetramer specifically recognizes Holliday junction to form two types of complexes. A single tetramer is bound to the open configuration of the junction DNA in complex I, while the octameric RuvA core structure sandwiches the same junction in complex II. The hexameric RuvB rings, symmetrically bound to both sides of RuvA on Holliday junction, pump out DNA duplexes, depending upon ATP hydrolysis. We investigated functional differences between the wild-type RuvA from Thermus thermophilus and mutants impaired the ability of complex II formation. These mutant RuvA, exclusively forming complex I, reduced activities of branch migration and ATP hydrolysis, suggesting that the octameric RuvA is essential for efficient branch migration. Together with our recent electron microscopic analysis, this finding provides important insights into functional roles of complex II in the coordinated branch migration mechanism.     

RuvA is a sliding collar that protects Holliday junctions from unwinding while promoting branch migration

The RuvAB proteins catalyze branch migration of Holliday junctions during DNA recombination in Escherichia coli. RuvA binds tightly to the Holliday junction, and then recruits two RuvB pumps to power branch migration. Previous investigations have studied RuvA in conjunction with its cellular partner RuvB. The replication fork helicase DnaB catalyzes branch migration like RuvB but, unlike RuvB, is not dependent on RuvA for activity. In this study, we specifically analyze the function of RuvA by studying RuvA in conjunction with DnaB, a DNA pump that does not work with RuvA in the cell. Thus, we use DnaB as a tool to dissect RuvA function from RuvB. We find that RuvA does not inhibit DnaB-catalyzed branch migration of a homologous junction, even at high concentrations of RuvA. Hence, specific protein-protein interaction is not required for RuvA mobilization during branch migration, in contrast to previous proposals. However, low concentrations of RuvA block DnaB unwinding at a Holliday junction. RuvA even blocks DnaB-catalyzed unwinding when two DnaB rings are acting in concert on opposite sides of the junction. These findings indicate that RuvA is intrinsically mobile at a Holliday junction when the DNA is undergoing branch migration, but RuvA is immobile at the same junction during DNA unwinding. We present evidence that suggests that RuvA can slide along a Holliday junction structure during DnaB-catalyzed branch migration, but not during unwinding. Thus, RuvA may act as a sliding collar at Holliday junctions, promoting DNA branch migration activity while blocking other DNA remodeling activities. Finally, we show that RuvA is less mobile at a heterologous junction compared to a homologous junction, as two opposing DnaB pumps are required to mobilize RuvA over heterologous DNA.     

The RuvABC resolvasome.

The RuvABC resolvasome of Escherichia coli catalyses the resolution of Holliday junctions that arise during genetic recombination and DNA repair. This process involves two key steps: branch migration, catalysed by the RuvB protein that is targeted to the Holliday junction by the structure specific RuvA protein, and resolution, which is catalysed by the RuvC endonuclease. We have quantified the interaction of the RuvA protein with synthetic Holliday junctions and have shown that the binding of the protein is highly structure-specific, and leads to the formation of a complex containing two tetramers of RuvA per Holliday junction. Our data are consistent with two tetramers of RuvA binding to the DNA recombination intermediate in a co-operative manner. Once formed this complex prevents the binding of RuvC to the Holliday junction. However, the formation of a RuvAC complex can be observed following sequential addition of the RuvC and RuvA proteins. Moreover, by examining the DNA recognition properties of a mutant RuvA protein (E55R, D56K) we show that the charge on the central pin is critical for directing the structure-specific binding by RuvA.     

Branch migration and Holliday junction resolution catalyzed by activities from mammalian cells

During homologous recombination, DNA strand exchange leads to Holliday junction formation. The movement, or branch migration, of this junction along DNA extends the length of the heteroduplex joint. In prokaryotes, branch migration and Holliday junction resolution are catalyzed by the RuvA and RuvB proteins, which form a complex with RuvC resolvase to form a "resolvasome". Mammalian cell-free extracts have now been fractionated to reveal analogous activities. An ATP-dependent branch migration activity, which migrates junctions through >2700 bp, cofractionates with the Holliday junction resolvase during several chromatographic steps. Together, the two activities promote concerted branch migration/resolution reactions similar to those catalyzed by E. coli RuvABC, highlighting the preservation of this essential pathway in recombination and DNA repair from prokaryotes to mammals.     

Processing of recombination intermediates by the RecG and RuvAB proteins of Escherichia coli.

The RuvAB, RuvC and RecG proteins of Escherichia coli process intermediates in recombination and DNA repair into mature products. RuvAB and RecG catalyse branch migration of Holliday junctions, while RuvC resolves these structures by nuclease cleavage around the point of strand exchange. The overlap between RuvAB and RecG was investigated using synthetic X- and Y-junctions. RuvAB is a complex of RuvA and RuvB, with RuvA providing the DNA binding subunit and RuvB the ATPase activity that drives branch migration. Both RuvA and RecG form defined complexes with each of the junctions. The gel mobilities of these complexes suggests that the X-junction attracts two tetramers of RuvA, but mainly monomers of RecG. Dissociation of the junction in the presence of ATP requires high levels of RuvAB. RecG is shown to have a much higher specific activity to the extent that very little of this protein would be required to match RuvAB in vivo. Both proteins also dissociate a Y-junction, which is consistent with helicase activity. However, RecG shows no ability to unwind more conventional substrates and the suggestion is made that its helicase activity is directed towards specific DNA structures such as junctions.     

Electron microscopic single particle analysis of a tetrameric RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex

During the late stage of homologous recombination in prokaryotes, RuvA binds to the Holliday junction intermediate and executes branch migration in association with RuvB. The RuvA subunits form two distinct complexes with the Holliday junction: complex I with the single RuvA tetramer on one side of the four way junction DNA, and complex II with two tetramers on both sides. To investigate the functional roles of complexes I and II, we mutated two residues of RuvA (L125D and E126K) to prevent octamer formation. An electron microscopic analysis indicated that the mutant RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex formed the characteristic tripartite structure, with only one RuvA tetramer bound to one side of the Holliday junction, demonstrating the unexpected stability of this complex. The novel bent images of the complex revealed an intriguing morphological similarity to the structure of SV40 large T antigen, which belongs to the same AAA+ family as RuvB.     

RuvAB-mediated branch migration does not involve extensive DNA opening within the RuvB hexamer

The Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins promote the branch migration of Holliday junctions during the late stages of homologous recombination and DNA repair (reviewed in [1]). Biochemical and structural studies of the RuvAB-Holliday junction complex have shown that RuvA binds directly to the Holliday junction [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and acts as a specificity factor that promotes the targeting of RuvB [7] [8], a hexameric ring protein that drives branch migration [9] [10] [11]. Electron microscopic visualisation of the RuvAB complex revealed that RuvA is flanked by two RuvB hexamers, which bind DNA arms that lie diametrically opposed across the junction [8]. ATP-dependent branch migration occurs as duplex DNA is pumped out through the centre of each ring. Because RuvB possesses well-conserved helicase motifs and RuvAB exhibits a 5'-3' DNA helicase activity in vitro [12], the mechanism of branch migration is thought to involve DNA opening within the RuvB ring, which provides a single strand for the unidirectional translocation of the protein along DNA. We have investigated whether the RuvB ring can translocate along duplex DNA containing a site-directed interstrand psoralen crosslink. Surprisingly, we found that the crosslink failed to inhibit branch migration. We interpret these data as evidence against a base-by-base tracking model and suggest that extensive DNA opening within the RuvB ring is not required for DNA translocation by RuvB.     

Dissociation of synthetic Holliday junctions by E. coli RecG protein.

The RecG protein of Escherichia coli is needed for normal levels of recombination and for repair of DNA damaged by ultraviolet light, mitomycin C and ionizing radiation. The true extent of its involvement in these processes is masked to a large degree by what appears to be a functional overlap with the products of the three ruv genes. RuvA and RuvB act together to promote branch migration of Holliday junctions, while RuvC catalyses the resolution of these recombination intermediates into viable products by endonuclease cleavage. In this paper, we describe the overproduction and purification of RecG and demonstrate that the overlap extends to the biochemistry. We show that the 76 kDa RecG protein is a DNA-dependent ATPase, like RuvB. Using gel retardation assays we demonstrate that it binds specifically to a synthetic Holliday junction, like RuvA and RuvC. Finally, we show that in the presence of ATP and Mg2+, RecG dissociates these junctions to duplex products, like RuvAB. We suggest that RecG and RuvAB provide alternative activities than can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions in recombination and DNA repair.     

Rapid analysis of protein-nucleic acid complexes using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry and ion pair reverse phase liquid chromatography

The RuvABC resolvasome of Escherichia coli typifies nucleoprotein complexes involved in genetic transactions. This molecular assembly catalyses the resolution of Holliday junctions that arise during genetic recombination and DNA repair. This process involves two key steps: branch migration, catalysed by the RuvB protein that is targeted to the Holliday junction by the structure specific RuvA protein, and resolution, which is catalysed by the RuvC endonuclease. We have used matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to rapidly identify the binding of RuvA to an immobilised synthetic Holliday junction; unambiguous identification was verified using tryptic digest of the bound protein. In conjunction with a novel fluorescent-based technique incorporating ion pair reverse phase liquid chromatography, a "footprint" of the RuvA:Holliday complex was obtained. These two complementary techniques offer a generic approach to the analysis of nucleoprotein complexes.     

Characterisation of RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes by glycerol gradient sedimentation.

The Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins interact specifically with Holliday junctions to promote ATP-dependent branch migration during genetic recombination and DNA repair. In the work described here, glycerol gradient centrifugation was used to investigate the requirements for the formation of pre-branch migration complexes. Since gradient centrifugation provides a simple and gentle method to analyse relatively unstable protein-DNA complexes, we were able to detect RuvA- and RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes without the need for chemical fixation. Using 35S-labelled RuvA protein and 3H-labelled Holliday junctions, we show that RuvA acts as a helicase accessory factor that loads the RuvB helicase onto the Holliday junction by structure-specific interactions. The resulting complex contained both RuvA and RuvB, as detected by Western blotting using serum raised against RuvA and RuvB. The stoichiometry of binding was estimated to be approximately four RuvA tetramers per junction. Formation of the RuvAB-Holliday junction complex required the presence of divalent metal ions and occurred without the need for ATP. However, the stability of the complex was enhanced by the presence of ATP gamma S, a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue. The data support a model for branch migration in which structure-specific binding of Holliday junctions by RuvA targets the assembly of hexameric RuvB rings on DNA. Specific loading of the RuvB ring helicase by RuvA is likely to be the initial step towards ATP-dependent branch migration.     

Functional interactions of Mycobacterium leprae RuvA with Escherichia coli RuvB and RuvC on holliday junctions

The Mycobacterium leprae RuvA homologue (MlRuvA) was over-expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The DNA-binding specificity and the functional interactions of MlRuvA with E. coli RuvB and RuvC (EcRuvB and EcRuvC) were examined using synthetic Holliday junctions. MlRuvA bound specifically to Holliday junctions and produced similar band-shift patterns as EcRuvA. Moreover, MlRuvA formed functional DNA helicase and branch-migration enzymes with EcRuvB, although the heterologous enzyme had a lower efficiency. These results demonstrate that the RuvA homologue of M. leprae is a functional branch-migration subunit.Whereas MlRuvA promoted branch-migration in combination with EcRuvB, it was unable to stimulate branch-migration-dependent resolution in a RuvABC complex. The inability to stimulate RuvC was not due to its failure to form heterologous RuvABC complexes on junctions, since such complexes were detected by co-immunoprecipitation. Most likely, the stability of the heterologous RuvABC complex and, possibly, the interactions between RuvA and RuvC were impaired, as gel-shift experiments failed to show mixed MlRuvA-EcRuvC-junction complexes. These results demonstrate that branch-migration per se and the assembly of a RuvABC complex on the Holliday junction are insufficient for RuvAB-dependent resolution of the junction by RuvC, suggesting that specific and intimate interactions between all three proteins are required for the function of a RuvABC "resolvasome".     

Novel properties of the Thermus thermophilus RuvB protein, which promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions

Branch migration of Holliday junctions, which are central DNA intermediates in homologous recombination, is promoted by the RuvA-RuvB protein complex, and the junctions are resolved by the action of the RuvC protein in Escherichia coli. We report here the cloning of the ruvB gene from a thermophilic eubacterium, Thermus thermophilus HB8 (Tth), and the biochemical characterization of the gene product expressed in E. coli. The Tth ruvB gene could not complement the UV sensitivity of an E. coli ruvB deletion mutant and made the wild-type strain more sensitive to UV. In contrast to E. coli RuvB, whose ATPase activity is strongly enhanced by supercoiled DNA but only weakly enhanced by linear duplex DNA, the ATPase activity of Tth RuvB was efficiently and equally enhanced by supercoiled and linear duplex DNA. Tth RuvB hydrolyzed a broader range of nucleoside triphosphates than E. coli RuvB. In addition, Tth RuvB, in the absence of RuvA protein, promoted branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 60°?C in an ATP-dependent manner. The protein, as judged by its ATPase activity, required ATP for thermostability. Since a RuvA protein has not yet been identified in T. thermophilus, we used E. coli RuvA to examine the effects of RuvA on the activities of Tth RuvB. E. coli RuvA greatly enhanced the ability of Tth RuvB to hydrolyze ATP in the presence of DNA and to promote branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 37°?C. These results indicate the conservation of the RuvA-RuvB interaction in different bacterial species, and suggest the existence of a ruvA homolog in T. thermophilus. Although GTP and dGTP were efficiently hydrolyzed by Tth RuvB, these nucleoside triphosphates could not be utilized for branch migration in vitro, implying that the conformational change in RuvB brought about by ATP hydrolysis, which is necessary for driving the Holliday junction branch migration, cannot be accomplished by the hydrolysis of these nucleoside triphosphates.     

ATP-dependent branch migration of Holliday junctions promoted by the RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli.

The RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli, which are induced as part of the cellular response to DNA damage, act together to promote the branch migration of Holliday junctions. Addition of purified RuvA and RuvB to a RecA-mediated recombination reaction stimulates the rate of strand exchange and the formation of hetero-duplex DNA. Stimulation does not occur via interaction with RecA; instead, RuvA and RuvB act directly upon recombination intermediates (Holliday junctions) made by RecA. We show that RuvAB-mediated branch migration requires ATP and can bypass UV-induced DNA lesions. At high RuvB concentrations, the requirement for RuvA is overcome, indicating that the RuvB ATPase provides the motor force for branch migration. RuvA protein provides specificity by binding to the Holliday junction, thereby reducing the requirement for RuvB by 50-fold. The newly discovered biochemical properties of RuvA, RuvB, and RuvC are incorporated into a model for the postreplicational repair of DNA following UV irradiation.     

Action of RuvAB at replication fork structures

The replicative apparatus often encounters blocks to its progression that necessitate removal of the block and reloading of the replication machinery. In Escherichia coli, a major pathway of replication restart involves unwinding of the stalled fork to generate a four-stranded Holliday junction, which can then be cleaved by the RuvABC helicase-endonuclease. This fork regression may be catalyzed by RecG but is thought to occur even in its absence. Here we test whether RuvAB helicase can also catalyze the unwinding of forked DNA to form Holliday junctions. We find that fork DNA is unwound in the direction required for Holliday junction formation only if the loading of RuvB is restricted to the parental duplex DNA arm. If the binding of RuvB is unrestricted, then RuvAB preferentially unwinds forks in the opposite direction. This is probably related to the greater efficiency of two opposed RuvB hexamers operating across a junction compared with a single hexamer. These data argue against RuvAB acting directly at damaged replication forks and imply that other mechanisms must operate in vivo to catalyze Holliday junction formation.