A Novel Genotype H9N2 Influenza Virus Possessing Human H5N1 Internal Genomes Has Been Circulating in Poultry in Eastern China since 1998

Many novel reassortant influenza viruses of the H9N2 genotype have emerged in aquatic birds in southern China since their initial isolation in this region in 1994. However, the genesis and evolution of H9N2 viruses in poultry in eastern China have not been investigated systematically. In the current study, H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in eastern China during the past 10 years were characterized genetically and antigenically. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these H9N2 viruses have undergone extensive reassortment to generate multiple novel genotypes, including four genotypes (J, F, K, and L) that have never been recognized before. The major H9N2 influenza viruses represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/1994 (Ck/BJ/1/94)-like viruses circulating in poultry in eastern China before 1998 have been gradually replaced by A/Chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 (Ck/SH/F/98)-like viruses, which have a genotype different from that of viruses isolated in southern China. The similarity of the internal genes of these H9N2 viruses to those of the H5N1 influenza viruses isolated from 2001 onwards suggests that the Ck/SH/F/98-like virus may have been the donor of internal genes of human and poultry H5N1 influenza viruses circulating in Eurasia. Experimental studies showed that some of these H9N2 viruses could be efficiently transmitted by the respiratory tract in chicken flocks. Our study provides new insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses and supports the notion that some of these viruses may have been the donors of internal genes found in H5N1 viruses.Wild birds, including wild waterfowls, gulls, and shorebirds, are the natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses, in which they are thought to be in evolutionary stasis (2, 33). However, when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to new hosts such as terrestrial poultry or mammals, they evolve rapidly and may cause occasional severe systemic infection with high morbidity (20, 29). Despite the fact that avian influenza virus infection occurs commonly in chickens, it is unable to persist for a long period of time due to control efforts and/or a failure of the virus to adapt to new hosts (29). In the past 20 years, greater numbers of outbreaks in poultry have occurred, suggesting that the avian influenza virus can infect and spread in aberrant hosts for an extended period of time (5, 14-16, 18, 32).During the past 10 years, H9N2 influenza viruses have become panzootic in Eurasia and have been isolated from outbreaks in poultry worldwide (3, 5, 11, 14-16, 18, 24). A great deal of previous studies demonstrated that H9N2 influenza viruses have become established in terrestrial poultry in different Asian countries (5, 11, 13, 14, 18, 21, 24, 35). In 1994, H9N2 viruses were isolated from diseased chickens in Guangdong province, China, for the first time (4), and later in domestic poultry in other provinces in China (11, 16, 18, 35). Two distinct H9N2 virus lineages represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/94 (H9N2) and A/Quail/Hong Kong/G1/98 (H9N2), respectively, have been circulating in terrestrial poultry of southern China (9). Occasionally these viruses expand their host range to other mammals, including pigs and humans (6, 17, 22, 34). Increasing epidemiological and laboratory findings suggest that chickens may play an important role in expanding the host range for avian influenza virus. Our systematic surveillance of influenza viruses in chickens in China showed that H9N2 subtype influenza viruses continued to be prevalent in chickens in mainland China from 1994 to 2008 (18, 19, 36).Eastern China contains one metropolitan city (Shanghai) and five provinces (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Shandong, and Jiangxi), where domestic poultry account for approximately 50% of the total poultry population in China. Since 1996, H9N2 influenza viruses have been isolated regularly from both chickens and other minor poultry species in our surveillance program in the eastern China region, but their genetic diversity and the interrelationships between H9N2 influenza viruses and different types of poultry have not been determined. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the evolution and properties of these viruses. The current report provides insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in eastern China and presents new evidence for the potential crossover between H9N2 and H5N1 influenza viruses in this region.     

Virulence-Associated Substitution D222G in the Hemagglutinin of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Virus Affects Receptor Binding

The clinical impact of the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus (pdmH1N1) has been relatively low. However, amino acid substitution D222G in the hemagglutinin of pdmH1N1 has been associated with cases of severe disease and fatalities. D222G was introduced in a prototype pdmH1N1 by reverse genetics, and the effect on virus receptor binding, replication, antigenic properties, and pathogenesis and transmission in animal models was investigated. pdmH1N1 with D222G caused ocular disease in mice without further indications of enhanced virulence in mice and ferrets. pdmH1N1 with D222G retained transmissibility via aerosols or respiratory droplets in ferrets and guinea pigs. The virus displayed changes in attachment to human respiratory tissues in vitro, in particular increased binding to macrophages and type II pneumocytes in the alveoli and to tracheal and bronchial submucosal glands. Virus attachment studies further indicated that pdmH1N1 with D222G acquired dual receptor specificity for complex α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids. Molecular dynamics modeling of the hemagglutinin structure provided an explanation for the retention of α2,6 binding. Altered receptor specificity of the virus with D222G thus affected interaction with cells of the human lower respiratory tract, possibly explaining the observed association with enhanced disease in humans.In April 2009, the H1N1 influenza A virus of swine origin was detected in humans in North America (9, 12, 42). Evidence for its origin came from analyses of the viral genome, with six gene segments displaying the closest resemblance to American “triple-reassortant” swine viruses and two to “Eurasian-lineage” swine viruses (13, 42). After this first detection in humans, the virus spread rapidly around the globe, starting the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century. The 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus (pdmH1N1) has been relatively mild, with a spectrum of disease ranging from subclinical infections or mild upper respiratory tract illness to sporadic cases of severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (3, 11, 27, 29, 30, 37). Overall, the case-fatality rate during the start of the pandemic was not significantly higher than in seasonal epidemics in most countries. However, a marked difference was observed in the case-fatality rate in specific age groups, with seasonal influenza generally causing highest mortality in elderly and immunocompromised individuals, and the pdmH1N1 affecting a relatively large proportion of (previously healthy) young individuals (3, 11, 27, 29, 30, 37).Determinants of influenza A virus virulence have been mapped for a wide variety of zoonotic and pandemic influenza viruses to the polymerase genes, hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1). Such virulence-associated substitutions generally facilitate more efficient replication in humans via improved interactions with host cell factors. Since most of these virulence-associated substitutions were absent in the earliest pdmH1N1s, it has been speculated that the virus could acquire some of these mutations, potentially resulting in the emergence of more pathogenic viruses. Such virulence markers could be acquired by gene reassortment with cocirculating influenza A viruses, or by mutation. The influenza virus polymerase genes, in particular PB2, have been shown to be important determinants of the virulence of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 and H7N7 viruses and the transmission of the 1918 H1N1 Spanish influenza virus (17, 26, 34, 51). One of the most commonly identified virulence markers to date is E627K in PB2. The glutamic acid (E) residue is generally found in avian influenza viruses, while human viruses have a lysine (K), and this mutation was described as a determinant of host range in vitro (48). Given that all human and many zoonotic influenza viruses of the last century contained 627K, it was surprising that the pdmH1N1 had 627E. In addition, an aspartate (D)-to-asparagine (N) substitution at position 701 (D701N) of PB2 has previously been shown to expand the host range of avian H5N1 virus to mice and humans and to increase virus transmission in guinea pigs (26, 46). Like E627K, D701N was absent in the genome of pdmH1N1. Thus, the pdmH1N1 was the first known human pandemic virus with 627E and 701D, and it has been speculated that pdmH1N1 could mutate into a more virulent form by acquiring one of these mutations or both. Recently, it was shown that neither E627K nor D701N in PB2 of pdmH1N1 increased its virulence in ferrets and mice (18). The PB1-F2 protein has previously also been associated with high pathogenicity of the 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 viruses (8). The PB1-F2 protein of the pdmH1N1 is truncated due to premature stop codons. However, restoration of the PB1-F2 reading frame did not result in viruses with increased virulence (15). The NS1 protein of pdmH1N1 is also truncated due to a stop codon and, as a result, does not contain a PDZ ligand domain that is involved in cell-signaling pathways and has been implicated in the pathogenicity of 1918 H1N1 and HPAI H5N1 viruses (5, 8, 21). Surprisingly, restoration of a full-length version of the NS1 gene did not result in increased virulence in animal models (16). Mutations affecting virulence and host range have further frequently been mapped to hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) in relation to their interaction with α2,3- or α2,6-linked sialic acids (SAs), the virus receptors on host cells (17, 32, 35, 50). The HA gene of previous pandemic viruses incorporated substitutions that allow efficient attachment to α2,6-SAs—the virus receptor on human cells—compared to ancestral avian viruses that attach more efficiently to α2,3-SAs (35, 47, 50).To search for mutations of potential importance to public health, numerous laboratories performed genome sequencing of pdmH1N1s, resulting in the real-time accumulation of information on emergence of potential virulence markers. Of specific interest were reports on amino acid substitutions from aspartic acid (D) to glycine (G) at position 222 (position 225 in H3) in HA of pdmH1N1. This substitution was observed in a fatal case of pdmH1N1 infection in June 2009 in the Netherlands (M. Jonges et al., unpublished data). Between July and December 2009, viruses from 11 (18%) of 61 cases with severe disease outcome in Norway have also been reported to harbor the D222G substitution upon direct sequencing of HA in clinical specimens. Such mutant viruses were not observed in any of 205 mild cases investigated, and the frequency of detection of this mutation was significantly higher in severe cases than in mild cases (23). In Hong Kong, the D222G substitution was detected in 12.5% (6) and 4.1% (31) of patients with severe disease and in 0% of patients with mild disease, in two different studies without prior propagation in embryonated chicken eggs. In addition to Norway and Hong Kong, the mutation has been detected in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, Ukraine, and the United States (56). Thus, D222G in HA could be the first identified “virulence marker” of pdmH1N1. pdmH1N1 with D222G in HA have not become widespread in the population, although they were detected in several countries. However, D222G in HA is of special interest, since it has also been described as the single change in HA between two strains of the “Spanish” 1918 H1N1 virus that differed in receptor specificity (47). Furthermore, upon propagation in embryonated chicken eggs, pdmH1N1 can acquire the mutation rapidly, presumably because it results in virus adaptation to avian (α2,3-SAs) receptors (49). The presence of the substitution in pdmH1N1s in the human population and its potential association with more severe disease prompted us to test its effect on pdmH1N1 receptor binding, replication, antigenic properties, and pathogenesis and transmission in animal models.     

Swine Influenza H1N1 Virus Induces Acute Inflammatory Immune Responses in Pig Lungs: a Potential Animal Model for Human H1N1 Influenza Virus

Pigs are capable of generating reassortant influenza viruses of pandemic potential, as both the avian and mammalian influenza viruses can infect pig epithelial cells in the respiratory tract. The source of the current influenza pandemic is H1N1 influenza A virus, possibly of swine origin. This study was conducted to understand better the pathogenesis of H1N1 influenza virus and associated host mucosal immune responses during acute infection in humans. Therefore, we chose a H1N1 swine influenza virus, Sw/OH/24366/07 (SwIV), which has a history of transmission to humans. Clinically, inoculated pigs had nasal discharge and fever and shed virus through nasal secretions. Like pandemic H1N1, SwIV also replicated extensively in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts, and lung lesions were typical of H1N1 infection. We detected innate, proinflammatory, Th1, Th2, and Th3 cytokines, as well as SwIV-specific IgA antibody in lungs of the virus-inoculated pigs. Production of IFN-γ by lymphocytes of the tracheobronchial lymph nodes was also detected. Higher frequencies of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, γδ T cells, dendritic cells, activated T cells, and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were detected in SwIV-infected pig lungs. Concomitantly, higher frequencies of the immunosuppressive T regulatory cells were also detected in the virus-infected pig lungs. The findings of this study have relevance to pathogenesis of the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in humans; thus, pigs may serve as a useful animal model to design and test effective mucosal vaccines and therapeutics against influenza virus.Swine influenza is a highly contagious, acute respiratory viral disease of swine. The causative agent, swine influenza virus (SwIV), is a strain of influenza virus A in the Orthomyxoviridae family. Clinical disease in pigs is characterized by sudden onset of anorexia, weight loss, dyspnea, pyrexia, cough, fever, and nasal discharge (21). Porcine respiratory tract epithelial cells express sialic acid receptors utilized by both avian (α-2,3 SA-galactose) and mammalian (α-2,6 SA-galactose) influenza viruses. Thus, pigs can serve as “mixing vessels” for the generation of new reassortant strains of influenza A virus that may contain RNA elements of both mammalian and avian viruses. These “newly generated” and reassorted viruses may have the potential to cause pandemics in humans and enzootics in animals (52).Occasional transmission of SwIV to humans has been reported (34, 43, 52), and a few of these cases resulted in human deaths. In April 2009, a previously undescribed H1N1 influenza virus was isolated from humans in Mexico. This virus has spread efficiently among humans and resulted in the current human influenza pandemic. Pandemic H1N1 virus is a triple reassortant (TR) virus of swine origin that contains gene segments from swine, human, and avian influenza viruses. Considering the pandemic potential of swine H1N1 viruses, it is important to understand the pathogenesis and mucosal immune responses of these viruses in their natural host. Swine can serve as an excellent animal model for the influenza virus pathogenesis studies. The clinical manifestations and pathogenesis of influenza in pigs closely resemble those observed in humans. Like humans, pigs are also outbred species, and they are physiologically, anatomically, and immunologically similar to humans (9, 23, 39, 40). In contrast to the mouse lung, the porcine lung has marked similarities to its human counterpart in terms of its tracheobronchial tree structure, lung physiology, airway morphology, abundance of airway submucosal glands, and patterns of glycoprotein synthesis (8, 10, 17). Furthermore, the cytokine responses in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from SwIV-infected pigs are also identical to those observed for nasal lavage fluids of experimentally infected humans (20). These observations support the idea that the pig can serve as an excellent animal model to study the pathogenesis of influenza virus.Swine influenza virus causes an acute respiratory tract infection. Virus replicates extensively in epithelial cells of the bronchi and alveoli for 5 to 6 days followed by clearance of viremia by 1 week postinfection (48). During the acute phase of the disease, cytokines such as alpha interferon (IFN-α), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-12, and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) are produced. These immune responses mediate both the clinical signs and pulmonary lesions (2). In acute SwIV-infected pigs, a positive correlation between cytokines in BAL fluid, lung viral titers, inflammatory cell infiltrates, and clinical signs has been detected (2, 48).Infection of pigs with SwIV of one subtype may confer complete protection from subsequent infections by homologous viruses and also partial protection against heterologous subtypes, but the nature of the immune responses generated in the swine are not fully delineated. Importantly, knowledge related to host mucosal immune responses in the SwIV-infected pigs is limited. So far only the protective virus-specific IgA and IgG responses in nasal washes and BAL fluid, as well as IgA, IgG, and IgM responses in the sera of infected pigs, have been reported (28). Pigs infected with H3N2 and H1N1 viruses have an increased frequency of neutrophils, NK cells, and CD4 and CD8 T cells in the BAL fluid (21). Pigs infected with the pandemic H1N1 virus showed activated CD4 and CD8 T cells in the peripheral blood on postinfection day (PID) 6 (27). Proliferating lymphocytes in BAL fluid and blood and virus-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes (TBLN) and spleen were detected in SwIV-infected pigs (7). Limited information is available on the mucosal immune responses in pig lungs infected with SwIV, which has a history of transmission to humans.In this study, we examined the acute infection of SwIV (strain SwIV OH07) in pigs with respect to viral replication, pathology, and innate and adaptive immune responses in the respiratory tract of these pigs. This virus was isolated from pigs which suffered from respiratory disease in Ohio, and the same virus was also transmitted to humans and caused clinical disease (43, 55). Interestingly, like pandemic H1N1 influenza virus, SwIV also infects the lower respiratory tract of pigs. Delineation of detailed mucosal immune responses generated in pig lungs during acute SwIV OH07 infection may provide new insights for the development of therapeutic strategies for better control of virus-induced inflammation and for the design and testing of effective vaccines.     

Reassortment between Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza Viruses in Ferrets: a Public Health Risk Assessment

This study investigated whether transmissible H5 subtype human-avian reassortant viruses could be generated in vivo. To this end, ferrets were coinfected with recent avian H5N1 (A/Thailand/16/04) and human H3N2 (A/Wyoming/3/03) viruses. Genotype analyses of plaque-purified viruses from nasal secretions of coinfected ferrets revealed that approximately 9% of recovered viruses contained genes from both progenitor viruses. H5 and H3 subtype viruses, including reassortants, were found in airways extending toward and in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets. However, only parental H5N1 genotype viruses were found in lung tissue. Approximately 34% of the recovered reassortant viruses possessed the H5 hemagglutinin (HA) gene, with five unique H5 subtypes recovered. These H5 reassortants were selected for further studies to examine their growth and transmissibility characteristics. Five H5 viruses with representative reassortant genotypes showed reduced titers in nasal secretions of infected ferrets compared to the parental H5N1 virus. No transmission by direct contact between infected and naïve ferrets was observed. These studies indicate that reassortment between H5N1 avian influenza and H3N2 human viruses occurred readily in vivo and furthermore that reassortment between these two viral subtypes is likely to occur in ferret upper airways. Given the relatively high incidence of reassortant viruses from tissues of the ferret upper airway, it is reasonable to conclude that continued exposure of humans and animals to H5N1 alongside seasonal influenza viruses increases the risk of generating H5 subtype reassortant viruses that may be shed from upper airway secretions.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5N1 subtype have caused devastating outbreaks in avian species during the past decade. After emerging in the Guangdong province of China in 1996, H5N1 viruses have extended their geographic distribution from Asia into Europe and Africa (45, 51). Sporadic transmission of H5N1 viruses from infected birds to humans has resulted in over 380 laboratory-confirmed infections and a case fatality rate of ∼60% since 2003 (48). Currently circulating H5N1 viruses lack the ability to undergo efficient and sustained transmission among humans although instances of limited human-to-human transmission have been reported (13, 41). If H5N1 viruses were to acquire genetic changes that confer efficient transmissibility among humans, then another pandemic would likely occur.The pandemics of 1957 and 1968 highlight the importance of genetic reassortment between avian and human influenza viruses as a mechanism for the generation of human pandemic strains (15, 46, 47). The structural separation of the influenza virus genome into eight independent genes allows formation of hybrid progeny viruses during coinfections. The 1957 H2N2 and 1968 H3N2 pandemic viruses acquired the hemagglutinin (HA) and PB1 genes, with or without the neuraminidase (NA) gene, respectively, from an avian virus progenitor (14, 33). The remaining genes of these pandemic reassortants were derived from a contemporary human virus (14, 33). The host species in which such human pandemic strains were generated by reassortment between human and avian viruses is not known. However, coinfection of the same cell with both human and avian viruses must have occurred, even though human and avian influenza viruses have preferences for different sialic acid receptor structures present on cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids (20, 30). The HA of human viruses preferentially binds α(2,6)-linked sialic acids while that of avian viruses preferentially bind α(2,3)-linked sialic acids (3, 12). Cells possessing both of these receptors could support coinfection of avian and human viruses, leading to reassortment.Human respiratory tract epithelial cells can possess surface glycans with α(2,3)- and α(2,6)-linked sialic acids and as such represent a potential host for the generation of avian-human reassortant viruses (24, 35). The general distribution of surface α(2,3)- and α(2,6)-linked sialic acids varies among cells of the human upper and lower respiratory tracts, which are anatomically separated by the larynx. Recent studies have shown that α(2,3)-linked sialic acids are present in tissues of the human lower respiratory tract (i.e., lung alveolar cells) (24, 35) as well as tissues of the human upper respiratory tract (24). Consistent with these findings, HPAI H5N1 viruses have been shown to attach to and infect tissues belonging to the lower respiratory tract (i.e., trachea, bronchi, and lung) (5, 25, 35, 40, 42, 43) as well as tissues belonging to the upper respiratory tract (i.e., nasopharyngeal, adenoid, and tonsillar) (25). Glycans with α(2,6)-linked sialic acids are more widespread on epithelial cells of the upper airways than lung alveoli (24, 35). In accordance, human seasonal influenza viruses preferentially attach to and infect cells of the upper respiratory tract (6, 25, 35, 43). If cells with both types of receptors are present in the human respiratory tract, simultaneous infection of a person with both human and avian viruses could generate reassortant viruses.Although viruses derived by reassortment between avian H5N1 and human H3N2 progenitors have been generated in vitro (17), reassortment between these avian and human strains in a coinfected mammalian host has not been shown. Furthermore, our knowledge of the genetic and phenotypic repertoire of such reassortants generated in vivo and their potential for transmission to uninfected hosts is limited (2, 17). In the present study, we used the ferret model to better understand the generation of reassortant viruses in a host coinfected with contemporary avian (H5N1) and human (H3N2) viruses and the extent to which such reassortants replicate and transmit from animal to animal. The domestic ferret (Mustela putoris) serves as an ideal small-animal model for influenza because ferrets are susceptible to human and avian influenza viruses, including HPAI H5N1 viruses, and reflect the relative transmissibility of human and avian influenza viruses in humans (9, 17, 18, 31, 36, 39, 53). Our study revealed that coinfection of ferrets reproducibly generated reassortant viruses that could be recovered from tissues within and extending toward the upper respiratory tract. Although H5 reassortant viruses were recovered from the upper airways, they displayed no transmissibility to contact ferrets, suggesting that additional functional changes are required for these viral subtypes to become pandemic within human populations.     

Characterization of the H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Derived from Wild Pikas in China

The highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus emerged from China in 1996 and has spread across Eurasia and Africa, with a continuous stream of new cases of human infection appearing since the first large-scale outbreak among migratory birds at Qinghai Lake. The role of wild birds, which are the natural reservoirs for the virus, in the epidemiology of the H5N1 virus has raised great public health concern, but their role in the spread of the virus within the natural ecosystem of free-ranging terrestrial wild mammals remains unclear. In this study, we investigated H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas in an attempt to trace the circulation of the virus. Seroepidemiological surveys confirmed a natural H5N1 virus infection of wild pikas in their native environment. The hemagglutination gene of the H5N1 virus isolated from pikas reveals two distinct evolutionary clades, a mixed/Vietnam H5N1 virus sublineage (MV-like pika virus) and a wild bird Qinghai (QH)-like H5N1 virus sublineage (QH-like pika virus). The amino acid residue (glutamic acid) at position 627 encoded by the PB2 gene of the MV-like pika virus was different from that of the QH-like pika virus; the residue of the MV-like pika virus was the same as that of the goose H5N1 virus (A/GS/Guangdong [GD]/1/96). Further, we discovered that in contrast to the MV-like pika virus, which is nonpathogenic to mice, the QH-like pika virus is highly pathogenic. To mimic the virus infection of pikas, we intranasally inoculated rabbits, a species closely related to pikas, with the H5N1 virus of pika origin. Our findings first demonstrate that wild pikas are mammalian hosts exposed to H5N1 subtype avian influenza viruses in the natural ecosystem and also imply a potential transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus from wild mammals into domestic mammalian hosts and humans.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an extremely infectious, systemic viral disease that causes a high rate of mortality in birds. HPAI H5N1 viruses are now endemic in avian populations in Southeast Asia and have repeatedly been transmitted to humans (9, 14, 27). Since 2003, the H5N1 subtype has been reported in 391 human cases of influenza and has caused 247 human deaths in 15 countries, leading to greater than 60% mortality among infected individuals (38). Although currently incapable of sustained human-to-human transmission, H5N1 viruses undoubtedly pose a serious threat to public health, as well as to the global economy. Hence, preparedness for such a threat is a global priority (36).Wild birds are considered to be natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses (6, 18, 21, 35, 37). Of the 144 type A influenza virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HA-NA) combinations, 103 have been found in wild birds (5, 7, 17, 37). Since the first HPAI outbreak among migratory wild birds appeared at Qinghai Lake in western China in May 2005 (3, 16, 25, 34, 41), HPAI viruses of the H5N1 subtype have been isolated from poultry throughout Eurasia and Africa. The continued occurrence of human cases has created a situation that could facilitate a pandemic emergence. There is heightened concern that wild birds are a reservoir for influenza A viruses that switch hosts and stably adapt to mammals, including horses, swine, and humans (11, 19, 22, 37).Despite the recent expansion of avian influenza virus (AIV) surveillance and genomic data (5, 17, 20, 21, 33, 40), fundamental questions remain concerning the ecology and evolution of these viruses. Little is known about how terrestrial wild mammals within their natural ecological systems affect HPAI H5N1 epidemiology or about the virus''s effects on public health, though there are many reports of natural and experimental H5N1 virus infection in animals belonging to the taxonomic orders Carnivora (12, 13, 15, 28, 29) and Artiodactyla (15). Herein, we provide the results of our investigation into H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas (Ochotona curzoniae of the order Lagomorpha) within their natural ecological setting. We describe our attempt to trace the circulation of H5N1 viruses and to characterize pika H5N1 influenza virus (PK virus).     

Dendritic Cell Activation by Recombinant Hemagglutinin Proteins of H1N1 and H5N1 Influenza A Viruses

Since dendritic cells may play a key role in defense against influenza virus infection, we examined the effects of recombinant hemagglutinin (HA) proteins derived from mouse-adapted H1N1 (A/WSN/1933), swine-origin 2009 pandemic H1N1 (A/Texas/05/2009), and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 (A/Thailand/KAN-1/2004) viruses on mouse myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs). The results reveal that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-12 (IL-12) p70, and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) expression was increased in mDCs after treatment with recombinant HA proteins of H1N1 and H5N1. The specificity of recombinant HA treatments for mDC activation was diminished after proteinase K digestion. HA apparently promotes mDC maturation by enhancing CD40 and CD86 expression and suppressing endocytosis. No significant differences in mDC activation were observed among recombinant proteins of H1N1 and H5N1. The stimulation of mDCs by HA proteins of H1N1 and H5N1 was completely MyD88 dependent. These findings may provide useful information for the development of more-effective influenza vaccines.Influenza viruses trigger seasonal epidemics or pandemics of contagious diseases with mild to severe consequences in human and poultry populations worldwide (28). Members of the Orthomyxoviridae family, influenza viruses consist of single-stranded, eight-segment, negative-sense genomic RNAs, helical viral ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes (RNA segments, NP, PB2, PB1, and PA) and four viral envelope proteins (hemagglutinin [HA], neuraminidase [NA], and M1 and M2 matrix proteins). Type A influenza viruses are further classified into various serotypes based on the antigenic characteristics of HA and NA glycoproteins (14).In 2009, a swine-origin H1N1 strain emerged from the genetic reassortants of existing human, avian, and swine influenza viruses, resulting in a global pandemic marked by symptoms more severe than those associated with seasonal influenza virus (3, 24). According to comparative pathology in macaque monkeys, H5N1 induces greater cytokinemia, tissue damage, and interference with immune regulatory mechanisms than H1N1 infection (2). The HA spike protein of influenza virus is believed to play important roles in viral receptor binding, fusion, transmission, host range restriction, virulence, and pathogenesis (13, 27-30).Dendritic cells (DCs), considered the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells, serve as links between innate and adaptive immunity (31). Upon encountering microbial pathogens, endogenous danger signals, or inflammatory mediators, DCs mature and elicit rapid and short-lived innate immune responses before migrating to secondary lymphoid organs and enhancing adaptive immunity (17). Two major subsets of DCs are recognized in mice and humans: (i) myeloid DCs (mDCs, also called conventional DCs), which participate most directly in antigen presentation and activation of naïve T cells, and (ii) plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), which produce type I interferons in response to viral infection (16, 42) and are also capable of inducing immunotolerance under some conditions (9). mDCs and pDCs also comprise different heterologous subsets, with unique localizations, phenotypes, and functions (36). Due to their key role in immune regulation, DCs have been developed for immunotherapeutic agents or prophylactic or therapeutic vaccines for cancer, infectious diseases, and immune system-related diseases (32, 34).DCs are essential in controlling the innate and adaptive immune responses against influenza virus infection (21). Viral RNA is recognized by various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs). TLRs play an especially important role in detecting virus invasion and activating DCs (18, 35). However, the mechanisms causing DC activation and maturation in response to influenza viruses are not clear. HA has been described as playing an important role in modulating influenza virus virulence and host immune responses (29). In this study, we examined the effects of several recombinant HA proteins (rHAs) derived from rHA of H1N1 (rH1HA) (A/WSN/1933) and (A/Texas/05/2009) and rHA of H5N1 (rH5HA) (A/Thailand/KAN-1/2004) viruses on the activation and maturation of the mDC subset derived from mouse bone marrow.     

Differential Activation of NK Cells by Influenza A Pseudotype H5N1 and 1918 and 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Viruses

Natural killer (NK) cells are the effectors of innate immunity and are recruited into the lung 48 h after influenza virus infection. Functional NK cell activation can be triggered by the interaction between viral hemagglutinin (HA) and natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp46 and NKp44 on the cell surface. Recently, novel subtypes of influenza viruses, such as H5N1 and 2009 pandemic H1N1, transmitted directly to the human population, with unusual mortality and morbidity rates. Here, the human NK cell responses to these viruses were studied. Differential activation of heterogeneous NK cells (upregulation of CD69 and CD107a and gamma interferon [IFN-γ] production as well as downregulation of NKp46) was observed following interactions with H5N1, 1918 H1N1, and 2009 H1N1 pseudotyped particles (pps), respectively, and the responses of the CD56^dim subset predominated. Much stronger NK activation was triggered by H5N1 and 1918 H1N1 pps than by 2009 H1N1 pps. The interaction of pps with NK cells and subsequent internalization were mediated by NKp46 partially. The NK cell activation by pps showed a dosage-dependent manner, while an increasing viral HA titer attenuated NK activation phenotypes, cytotoxicity, and IFN-γ production. The various host innate immune responses to different influenza virus subtypes or HA titers may be associated with disease severity.Influenza is a contagious, acute respiratory disease caused by influenza viruses and has caused substantial human morbidity and mortality over the past century (24, 27). The 1918-1919 pandemic caused by influenza virus type A H1N1 was responsible for an estimated 50 million deaths (21). In recent years, novel subtype influenza viruses, such as H5N1 and the 2009 pandemic H1N1, have been transmitted directly from animals to the human population. These infections were characterized by unusually high rates of severe respiratory disease and mortality among young patients (8, 18). Various genetic shifts have occurred in these viruses, allowing them to evade the host protective effects of specific antihemagglutinin (HA) or antineuraminidase (NA) antibodies (27). Therefore, host innate immunity in the early phase of infection, which includes a variety of pattern recognition molecules, inflammatory cytokines, and immune cells, such as macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells, plays a critical role in host defense.NK cells are bone marrow-derived, large, granular lymphocytes and are key effector cells in innate immunity for host defense against invading infectious pathogens and malignant transformation through cytolytic activity and production of cytokines, such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (10, 28, 43, 51). In humans, NK cells account for approximately 10% of all blood lymphocytes and are identified by their expression of the CD56 surface antigen and their lack of CD3. Two distinct subsets of human NK cells have been defined according to the cell surface density of CD56 expression (10). The majority (∼90% in blood) of human NK cells are CD56^dim, and a minor population (∼10% in blood) is CD56^bright. These NK subsets are functionally distinct, with the immunoregulatory CD56^bright cells producing abundant cytokines and the cytotoxic CD56^dim cells probably functioning as efficient effectors of natural and antibody-dependent target cell lysis (11).Many lines of evidence suggest that NK cells can be functionally activated by the interaction between natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) on the cell surface and influenza virus HA protein or stress-induced proteins from infected cells (2, 13, 33, 44, 46). On the other hand, influenza virus is able to evade host immunity by infecting NK cells and triggering cell apoptosis or by attenuating NK cell lysis of H3N2-infected cells, owing to alterations in HA binding properties (35, 39). The infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes into the lung and strong inflammatory responses were detected in H5N1 and the 1918 and 2009 pandemic H1N1 infections. Nevertheless, little is known about the precise roles of NK cells in these infections.In this study, the responses of NK cells to 1918 H1N1, 2009 H1N1, and H5N1 influenza A viruses were evaluated using three strains of influenza A virus pseudotyped particles (pps). Our findings may aid in understanding the pathogenicity of influenza viruses and its correlation with clinical severity.     

Pandemic H1N1 2009 Influenza A Virus Induces Weak Cytokine Responses in Human Macrophages and Dendritic Cells and Is Highly Sensitive to the Antiviral Actions of Interferons

In less than 3 months after the first cases of swine origin 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infections were reported from Mexico, WHO declared a pandemic. The pandemic virus is antigenically distinct from seasonal influenza viruses, and the majority of human population lacks immunity against this virus. We have studied the activation of innate immune responses in pandemic virus-infected human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages. Pandemic A/Finland/553/2009 virus, representing a typical North American/European lineage virus, replicated very well in these cells. The pandemic virus, as well as the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) and A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) viruses, induced type I (alpha/beta interferon [IFN-α/β]) and type III (IFN-λ1 to -λ3) IFN, CXCL10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) gene expression weakly in DCs. Mouse-adapted A/WSN/33 (H1N1) and human A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) viruses, instead, induced efficiently the expression of antiviral and proinflammatory genes. Both IFN-α and IFN-β inhibited the replication of the pandemic (H1N1) virus. The potential of IFN-λ3 to inhibit viral replication was lower than that of type I IFNs. However, the pandemic virus was more sensitive to the antiviral IFN-λ3 than the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) virus. The present study demonstrates that the novel pandemic (H1N1) influenza A virus can readily replicate in human primary DCs and macrophages and efficiently avoid the activation of innate antiviral responses. It is, however, highly sensitive to the antiviral actions of IFNs, which may provide us an additional means to treat severe cases of infection especially if significant drug resistance emerges.The novel swine origin 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus was identified in April 2009, and it is currently causing the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century. The virus is a completely new reassortant virus (8, 38), and the majority of the human population does not have preexisting immunity against it. The case fatality rate of the current pandemic virus infection is still unclear, but it is estimated to be somewhat higher than that of seasonal influenza virus infections (8). In most cases, the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus causes an uncomplicated respiratory tract illness with symptoms similar to those caused by seasonal influenza viruses. However, gastrointestinal symptoms atypical to seasonal influenza have been detected in a significant proportion of cases (4, 7, 35).The pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza A virus originates from a swine influenza A virus strain. It underwent multiple reassortment events in pigs and then transferred into the human population (8, 38). The new virus has gene segments from the North American triple-reassortant and Eurasian swine H1N1 viruses (8, 38). Sequence analysis of this new pandemic virus revealed that hemagglutinin (HA), NP, and NS gene segments are derived from the classical swine viruses, PB1 from human H3N2, and PB2 and PA from avian viruses within the triple-reassortant virus (8). In addition, the NA and M segments originate from the Eurasian swine virus lineage. The pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus is genetically and antigenically distinct from previous seasonal human influenza A (H1N1) viruses. Thus, the current seasonal influenza vaccines are likely to give little, if any, protection against pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus infection (12, 14). However, some evidence indicates that people born early in the 20th century have cross-neutralizing antibodies against the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) viruses (12, 14).At present, relatively little is known about the pathogenesis and transmission of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus in humans. Studies with ferrets revealed that the pandemic virus replicated better than seasonal H1N1 viruses in the respiratory tracts of the animals. This suggests that the virus is more pathogenic in ferrets than seasonal influenza viruses (19, 24). The respiratory tract is the primary infection site of all mammalian influenza viruses, and, indeed, the specific glycan receptors on the apical surface of the upper respiratory tract have been reported to bind HA of the 2009 A (H1N1) virus (19). In human lung tissue binding assays, 2009 A (H1N1) HA showed a glycan binding pattern similar to that of the HA from the pandemic 1918 A (H1N1) virus though its affinity to α2,6 glycans was much lower than that of the 1918 virus HA. The lower glycan binding properties of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus seemed to correlate with less-efficient transmission in ferrets compared to seasonal H1N1 viruses (19). According to another study with ferrets, the transmission of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus via respiratory droplets was as efficient as that of a seasonal A (H1N1) virus (24). It is clear that, besides experimental infections in animal models, analyses of the characters and pathogenesis of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus infection in humans are urgently needed.In the present study, we have focused on analyzing innate immune responses in primary human dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages in response to an infection with one of the Finnish isolates of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus. DCs and macrophages reside beneath the epithelium of the respiratory organs, and these cells are thus potential targets for influenza viruses. From the epithelial cells influenza viruses spread in DCs and macrophages, which coordinate the development of an effective innate immune response against the virus (22, 34, 41). During influenza virus infection, DCs and macrophages secrete antiviral cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (3, 13, 26). Moreover, DCs and macrophages activate virus-destroying NK cells and T cells with the cytokines they secrete and via direct cell-to-cell contacts (9, 29, 33, 37). Here we show that the pandemic (H1N1) virus infects and replicates very well in human monocyte-derived DCs and macrophages. The pandemic virus as well as two recent seasonal H1N1 viruses induced a relatively weak innate immune response in these cells, as evidenced by a poor expression of antiviral and proinflammatory cytokine genes. However, like seasonal influenza A viruses, the pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus was extremely sensitive to the antiviral actions of type I IFNs (IFN-α/β). Interestingly, the pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus was even more sensitive to antiviral IFN-λ3 than a seasonal A (H1N1) virus. Thus, IFNs may provide us with an additional means to combat severe pandemic influenza virus infections, especially if viral resistance against neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors begins to emerge.     

Receptor Specificity of Influenza A H3N2 Viruses Isolated in Mammalian Cells and Embryonated Chicken Eggs

Isolation of human subtype H3N2 influenza viruses in embryonated chicken eggs yields viruses with amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin (HA) that often affect binding to sialic acid receptors. We used a glycan array approach to analyze the repertoire of sialylated glycans recognized by viruses from the same clinical specimen isolated in eggs or cell cultures. The binding profiles of whole virions to 85 sialoglycans on the microarray allowed the categorization of cell isolates into two groups. Group 1 cell isolates displayed binding to a restricted set of α2-6 and α2-3 sialoglycans, whereas group 2 cell isolates revealed receptor specificity broader than that of their egg counterparts. Egg isolates from group 1 showed binding specificities similar to those of cell isolates, whereas group 2 egg isolates showed a significantly reduced binding to α2-6- and α2-3-type receptors but retained substantial binding to specific O- and N-linked α2-3 glycans, including α2-3GalNAc and fucosylated α2-3 glycans (including sialyl Lewis x), both of which may be important receptors for H3N2 virus replication in eggs. These results revealed an unexpected diversity in receptor binding specificities among recent H3N2 viruses, with distinct patterns of amino acid substitution in the HA occurring upon isolation and/or propagation in eggs. These findings also suggest that clinical specimens containing viruses with group 1-like receptor binding profiles would be less prone to undergoing receptor binding or antigenic changes upon isolation in eggs. Screening cell isolates for appropriate receptor binding properties might help focus efforts to isolate the most suitable viruses in eggs for production of antigenically well-matched influenza vaccines.Influenza A viruses are generally isolated and propagated in embryonated chicken eggs or in cultures of cells of mammalian origin. Human influenza viruses were previously noted to acquire mutations in the hemagglutinin (HA) gene upon isolation and culture in the allantoic sac of embryonated chicken eggs (herein simply referred to as “eggs”) compared to the sequences of those isolated in mammalian cell substrates (herein referred to as “cells”) (29, 30, 44, 53, 58). These mutations resulted in amino acid substitutions that were found to mediate receptor specificity changes and improved viral replication efficiency in eggs (37). In general, cell-grown viruses are assumed to be more similar than their egg-grown counterparts to the viruses present in respiratory secretions (30, 56). Since their emergence in 1968, influenza A (H3N2) viruses have evolved and adapted to the human host while losing their ability to be efficiently isolated and replicate in eggs, particularly after 1992 (37, 42, 48). The rate of isolation of H3N2 clinical specimens after inoculation into eggs can be up to ∼30 times lower than that in mammalian cell cultures, highlighting the strong selective pressure for the emergence of sequence variants (77).Virtually all influenza vaccines for human use were licensed decades ago by national regulatory authorities, which used a product manufactured from influenza viruses isolated and propagated exclusively in eggs; therefore, cell culture isolates have been unacceptable for this purpose (41, 71). The antigen composition of influenza vaccines requires frequent updates (every 2 years, on average) to closely match their antigenic properties to the most prevalent circulating antigenic drift variant viruses (51). The limited availability of H3N2 viruses isolated in eggs has on one or more occasions delayed vaccine composition updates and may have reduced the efficacy of vaccination against new antigenically drifted viruses (3, 34, 37).Entry of influenza viruses into host cells is mediated by HA, which binds to sialic acid containing glycoconjugates on the surface of epithelial cells in the upper respiratory tract (2, 13). The nature of the linkage between sialic acid and the vicinal sugar (usually galactose) varies in different host species and tissues and may therefore determine whether an influenza virus binds to and infects avian or human cells (40, 46, 59, 62, 72-75). Human influenza viruses preferentially bind to α2-6-linked sialic acids, and avian viruses predominantly bind to α2-3-linked sialic acids (59). Previous studies with chicken embryo chorioallantoic membranes revealed differential lectin binding, suggesting that α2-3-linked but not α2-6-linked sialosides are present on the epithelial cells (28). Human H3N2 viruses isolated in cell culture were reported to bind with a high affinity to α2-6-linked sialosides, while viruses isolated in eggs often had increased specificity for α2-3-linked sialosides (19, 20, 28). The functional classification of avian and mammalian influenza virus receptors is further complicated since in vitro and tissue-binding assays have led to new working hypotheses involving glycan chain length, topology, and the composition of the inner fragments of the carbohydrate chain as additional receptor specificity determinants (9, 17, 65, 66, 82). However, the significance of these in vitro properties remains unknown, since the structures of the natural sialosides on host cells that are used for infectious virus entry are undefined.The techniques most widely used to study the interactions of the influenza virus with host cell receptors employ animal cells in various assay formats (36, 57, 59, 64, 69). To overcome the problems of cell-based techniques, new assays that rely on labeled sialyl-glycoproteins or polymeric sialoglycans have been developed (18). However, these assays are limited by having only a few glycans available in polymeric form and offer low throughput. In contrast, glycan microarrays can assess virus binding to multiple well-defined glycans simultaneously. Previous work with influenza live or β-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated virions as well as recombinantly produced HAs revealed a good correlation with receptor specificity compared to that achieved by other methods of analysis (4, 11, 57, 58, 65-68).Here we have compared paired isolates derived in eggs or cell cultures from the single clinical specimen to better understand their receptor binding specificity and its implications for vaccine production. We examined the differences in the sequences of the HAs between egg- and cell-grown isolates and analyzed their receptor binding profiles using glycan microarrays. Sequence analysis of the HA and glycan binding results revealed two distinct groups of viruses, with many egg isolates showing unexpectedly reduced levels of binding to α2-3 and α2-6 sialosides compared to the levels for the viruses isolated in mammalian cells. Furthermore, these studies highlighted that specific glycans may be important for H3N2 virus growth in eggs.     

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Established by Seasonal Human Influenza Cross-React against 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus

While few children and young adults have cross-protective antibodies to the pandemic H1N1 2009 (pdmH1N1) virus, the illness remains mild. The biological reasons for these epidemiological observations are unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that the bulk memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) established by seasonal influenza viruses from healthy individuals who have not been exposed to pdmH1N1 can directly lyse pdmH1N1-infected target cells and produce gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Using influenza A virus matrix protein 1 (M1_58-66) epitope-specific CTLs isolated from healthy HLA-A2⁺ individuals, we further found that M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs efficiently killed both M1_58-66 peptide-pulsed and pdmH1N1-infected target cells ex vivo. These M1_58-66-specific CTLs showed an effector memory phenotype and expressed CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokine receptors. Of 94 influenza A virus CD8 T-cell epitopes obtained from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB), 17 epitopes are conserved in pdmH1N1, and more than half of these conserved epitopes are derived from M1 protein. In addition, 65% (11/17) of these epitopes were 100% conserved in seasonal influenza vaccine H1N1 strains during the last 20 years. Importantly, seasonal influenza vaccination could expand the functional M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs in 20% (4/20) of HLA-A2⁺ individuals. Our results indicated that memory CTLs established by seasonal influenza A viruses or vaccines had cross-reactivity against pdmH1N1. These might explain, at least in part, the unexpected mild pdmH1N1 illness in the community and also might provide some valuable insights for the future design of broadly protective vaccines to prevent influenza, especially pandemic influenza.Since its first identification in North America in April 2009, the novel pandemic H1N1 2009 (pdmH1N1) virus has been spreading in humans worldwide, giving rise to the first pandemic in the 21st century (13, 18). The pdmH1N1 virus contains a unique gene constellation, with its NA and M gene segments being derived from the Eurasian swine lineage while the other gene segments originated from the swine triple-reassortant H1N1 lineage. The triple-reassortant swine viruses have in turn derived the HA, NP, and NS gene segments from the classical swine lineage (20). The 1918 pandemic virus gave rise to both the seasonal influenza H1N1 and the classical swine H1N1 virus lineages (41). Evolution in different hosts during the subsequent 90 years has led to increasing antigenic differences between recent seasonal H1N1 viruses and swine H1 viruses (42). Thus, younger individuals have no antibodies that cross neutralize pdmH1N1, while those over 65 years of age are increasingly likely to have cross-neutralizing antibodies to pdmH1N1 (10, 25).Currently available seasonal influenza vaccines do not induce cross-reactive antibodies against this novel virus in any age group (10, 25). In animal models, it has been shown that pdmH1N1 replicated more efficiently and caused more severe pathological lesions than the current seasonal influenza virus (28). However, most patients with pdmH1N1 virus infection show a mild illness comparable to seasonal influenza (9, 42). The incidence of severe cases caused by pdmH1N1 was not significantly higher than that caused by human seasonal influenza viruses (43). These findings imply that seasonal influenza A virus-specific memory T cells preexisting in previously infected individuals may have cross-protection to this novel pdmH1N1.Cross-reactivity of influenza A virus-specific T-cell immunity against heterosubtypic strains which are serologically distinct has been demonstrated (5, 29, 33, 47). Humans who have not been exposed to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus do have cross-reactive memory CD4 and CD8 T cells to a wide range of H5N1 peptides (33, 47). More recently, one study also showed that some seasonal influenza A virus-specific memory T cells in individuals without exposure to prior pdmH1N1 infection can recognize pdmH1N1 (24). However, the results in most of these studies were determined by the gamma interferon (IFN-γ) responses to influenza virus peptides. Although the recalled IFN-γ response is commonly used to detect memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, the activated T cells that bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-presented peptide are not necessarily capable of lysing the target cells (6). In addition, the peptides, but not the whole virus, may not be able to fully represent the human cross-response against the virus as a whole. Therefore, in addition to cytokine production, the demonstration of direct antigen-specific cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) against both peptide-pulsed and virus-infected target cells is needed for better understanding of human CTL responses against pdmH1N1 virus.In this study, using bulk memory CTLs and epitope-specific CTLs established by seasonal influenza A viruses and epitope-specific peptide from healthy individuals, respectively, we evaluated their cross-cytotoxicity and cytokine responses to pdmH1N1. We also examined the expression of chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5, which could help CTLs to migrate to the site of infection. In addition, to understand whether the seasonal influenza vaccines have benefit for people who have not been exposed to pdmH1N1, we further examined the ability of seasonal influenza vaccines to induce the conserved M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs in HLA-A2-seropositive healthy individuals.     

Selection of H5N1 Influenza Virus PB2 during Replication in Humans

Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses continue to cause concern, even though currently circulating strains are not efficiently transmitted among humans. For efficient transmission, amino acid changes in viral proteins may be required. Here, we examined the amino acids at positions 627 and 701 of the PB2 protein. A direct analysis of the viral RNAs of H5N1 viruses in patients revealed that these amino acids contribute to efficient virus propagation in the human upper respiratory tract. Viruses grown in culture or eggs did not always reflect those in patients. These results emphasize the importance of the direct analysis of original specimens.Given the continued circulation of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses and their sporadic transmission to humans, the threat of a pandemic persists. However, for H5N1 influenza viruses to be efficiently transmitted among humans, amino acid substitutions in the avian viral proteins may be necessary.Two positions in the PB2 protein affect the growth of influenza viruses in mammalian cells (3, 11, 18): the amino acid at position 627 (PB2-627), which in most human influenza viruses is lysine (PB2-627Lys) and most avian viruses is glutamic acid (PB2-627Glu), and the amino acid at position 701. PB2-627Lys is associated with the efficient replication (16) and high virulence (5) of H5N1 viruses in mice. Moreover, an H7N7 avian virus isolated from a fatal human case of pneumonia possessed PB2-627Lys, whereas isolates from a nonfatal human case of conjunctivitis and from chickens during the same outbreak possessed PB2-627Glu (2).The amino acid at position 701 in PB2 is important for the high pathogenicity of H5N1 viruses in mice (11). Most avian influenza viruses possess aspartic acid at this position (PB2-701Asp); however, A/duck/Guangxi/35/2001 (H5N1), which is highly virulent in mice (11), possesses asparagine at this position (PB2-701Asn). PB2-701Asn is also found in equine (4) and swine (15) viruses, as well as some H5N1 human isolates (7, 9). Thus, both amino acids appear to be markers for the adaptation of H5N1 viruses in humans (1, 3, 17).Massin et al. (13) reported that the amino acid at PB2-627 affects viral RNA replication in cultured cells at low temperatures. Recently, we demonstrated that viruses, including those of the H5N1 subtype, with PB2-627Lys (human type) grow better at low temperatures in cultured cells than those with PB2-627Glu (avian type) (6). This association between the PB2 amino acid and temperature-dependent growth correlates with the body temperatures of hosts; the human upper respiratory tract is at a lower temperature (around 33°C) than the lower respiratory tract (around 37°C) and the avian intestine, where avian influenza viruses usually replicate (around 41°C). The ability to replicate at low temperatures may be crucial for viral spread among humans via sneezing and coughing by being able to grow in the upper respiratory organs. Therefore, the Glu-to-Lys mutation in PB2-627 is an important step for H5N1 viruses to develop pandemic potential.However, there is no direct evidence that the substitutions of PB2-627Glu with PB2-627Lys and PB2-701Asp with PB2-701Asn occur during the replication of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in human respiratory organs. Therefore, here, we directly analyzed the nucleotide sequences of viral genes from several original specimens collected from patients infected with H5N1 viruses.     

A Single Immunization with CoVaccine HT-Adjuvanted H5N1 Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces Protective Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses in Ferrets

Highly pathogenic avian influenza A viruses of the H5N1 subtype continue to circulate in poultry, and zoonotic transmissions are reported frequently. Since a pandemic caused by these highly pathogenic viruses is still feared, there is interest in the development of influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines that can protect humans against infection, preferably after a single vaccination with a low dose of antigen. Here we describe the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses in ferrets after vaccination with a cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A virus vaccine in combination with the novel adjuvant CoVaccine HT. The addition of CoVaccine HT to the influenza A virus vaccine increased antibody responses to homologous and heterologous influenza A/H5N1 viruses and increased virus-specific cell-mediated immune responses. Ferrets vaccinated once with a whole-virus equivalent of 3.8 μg hemagglutinin (HA) and CoVaccine HT were protected against homologous challenge infection with influenza virus A/VN/1194/04. Furthermore, ferrets vaccinated once with the same vaccine/adjuvant combination were partially protected against infection with a heterologous virus derived from clade 2.1 of H5N1 influenza viruses. Thus, the use of the novel adjuvant CoVaccine HT with cell culture-derived inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus antigen is a promising and dose-sparing vaccine approach warranting further clinical evaluation.Since the first human case of infection with a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of the H5N1 subtype in 1997 (9, 10, 37), hundreds of zoonotic transmissions have been reported, with a high case-fatality rate (10, 44). Since these viruses continue to circulate among domestic birds and human cases are regularly reported, it is feared that they will adapt to their new host or exchange gene segments with other influenza A viruses, become transmissible from human to human, and cause a new pandemic. Recently, a novel influenza A virus of the H1N1 subtype emerged. This virus, which originated from pigs, was transmitted between humans efficiently, resulting in the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century (8, 45). Although millions of people have been inoculated with the (H1N1)2009 virus, the case-fatality rate was relatively low compared to that for infections with the H5N1 viruses (11, 31). However, the unexpected pandemic caused by influenza A/H1N1(2009) viruses has further highlighted the importance of rapid availability of safe and effective pandemic influenza virus vaccines. Other key issues for the development of pandemic influenza A virus vaccines include optimal use of the existing (limited) capacity for production of viral antigen and effectiveness against viruses that are antigenically distinct. Ideally, a single administration of a low dose of antigen would be sufficient to induce protective immunity against the homologous strain and heterologous antigenic variant strains. However, since the population at large will be immunologically naïve to a newly introduced virus, high doses of antigen are required to induce protective immunity in unprimed subjects (23, 36). The use of safe and effective adjuvants in pandemic influenza virus vaccines is considered a dose-sparing strategy. Clinical trials evaluating candidate inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines showed that the use of adjuvants can increase their immunogenicity and broaden the specificity of the induced antibody responses (2, 7, 19, 23, 27, 36, 41). These research efforts have resulted in the licensing of adjuvanted vaccines against seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses (17). The protective efficacy of immune responses induced with candidate influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines was demonstrated in ferrets after two immunizations (1, 22, 24, 25) or after a single immunization. The latter was achieved with a low dose of antigen in combination with the adjuvant Iscomatrix (26).Recently, a novel adjuvant that consists of a sucrose fatty acid sulfate ester (SFASE) immobilized on the oil droplets of a submicrometer emulsion of squalane in water has been developed (4). It has been demonstrated that the addition of this novel adjuvant, called CoVaccine HT, to multiple antigens increased the immune response to these antigens in pigs and horses and was well tolerated in both species (4, 16, 40). Furthermore, it was shown that the use of CoVaccine HT increased the virus-specific antibody responses in mice and ferrets after vaccination with a cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccine (5, 13). One of the mode of actions of CoVaccine HT is the activation of antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells, most likely through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling (5).In the present study, we evaluated the protective potential of CoVaccine HT-adjuvanted cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus (WIV) vaccine in the ferret model, which is considered the most suitable animal model for the evaluation of candidate influenza virus vaccines (6, 14, 15). To this end, ferrets were vaccinated once or twice with various antigen doses with or without the adjuvant to test whether dose sparing could be achieved. The use of CoVaccine HT increased virus-specific antibody responses and T cell responses. A single administration of 3.8 μg hemagglutinin (HA) of WIV NIBRG-14 vaccine preparation in combination with CoVaccine HT conferred protection against challenge infection with the homologous highly pathogenic A/H5N1 virus strain A/VN/1194/04 and partial protection against infection with a heterologous, antigenically distinct strain, A/IND/5/05. Therefore, it was concluded that the use of CoVaccine HT in inactivated influenza virus vaccines induced protective virus-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses and that it could be suitable as adjuvant in (pre)pandemic A/H5N1 virus vaccines. Further clinical testing of these candidate vaccines seems to be warranted.     

Transmission of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus and Impact of Prior Exposure to Seasonal Strains or Interferon Treatment

Novel swine-origin influenza viruses of the H1N1 subtype were first detected in humans in April 2009. As of 12 August 2009, 180,000 cases had been reported globally. Despite the fact that they are of the same antigenic subtype as seasonal influenza viruses circulating in humans since 1977, these viruses continue to spread and have caused the first influenza pandemic since 1968. Here we show that a pandemic H1N1 strain replicates in and transmits among guinea pigs with similar efficiency to that of a seasonal H3N2 influenza virus. This transmission was, however, partially disrupted when guinea pigs had preexisting immunity to recent human isolates of either the H1N1 or H3N2 subtype and was fully blocked through daily intranasal administration of interferon to either inoculated or exposed animals. Our results suggest that partial immunity resulting from prior exposure to conventional human strains may blunt the impact of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the human population. In addition, the use of interferon as an antiviral prophylaxis may be an effective way to limit spread in at-risk populations.A pandemic of novel swine-origin influenza virus (H1N1) is developing rapidly. As of 12 August 2009, nearly 180,000 cases had been reported to the WHO from around the globe (36). Sustained human-to-human transmission has furthermore been observed in multiple countries, prompting the WHO to declare a public health emergency of international concern and to raise the pandemic alert level to phase 6 (7).Swine are a natural host of influenza viruses, and although sporadic incidences of human infection with swine influenza viruses occur (8, 9, 14, 29, 35), human-to-human transmission is rare. H1N1 influenza viruses have likely circulated in swine since shortly after the 1918 human influenza pandemic (38). From the 1930s, when a swine influenza virus was first isolated, to the late 1990s, this classical swine lineage has remained relatively stable antigenically (34). In the late 1990s, however, genetic reassortment between a human H3N2 virus, a North American avian virus, and a classical swine influenza virus produced a triple reassortant virus, which subsequently spread among North American swine (34). Further reassortment events involving human influenza viruses led to the emergence in pigs of triple reassortants of the H1N1 and H1N2 subtypes (34). None of these swine viruses have demonstrated the potential for sustained human-to-human transmission.The swine-origin influenza viruses now emerging in the human population possess a previously uncharacterized constellation of eight genes (28). The NA and M segments derive from a Eurasian swine influenza virus lineage, having entered pigs from the avian reservoir around 1979, while the HA, NP, and NS segments are of the classical swine lineage and the PA, PB1, and PB2 segments derive from the North American triple reassortant swine lineage (13). This unique combination of genetic elements (segments from multiple swine influenza virus lineages, some of them derived from avian and human influenza viruses) may account for the improved fitness of pandemic H1N1 viruses, relative to that of previous swine isolates, in humans.Several uncertainties remain about how this outbreak will develop over time. Although the novel H1N1 virus has spread over a broad geographical area, the number of people known to be infected remains low in many countries, which could be due, at least in part, to the lack of optimal transmission of influenza viruses outside the winter season; thus, it is unclear at this point whether the new virus will become established in the long term. Two major factors will shape the epidemiology of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the coming months and years: the intrinsic transmissibility of the virus and the degree of protection offered by previous exposure to seasonal human strains. Initial estimates of the reproductive number (R₀) have been made based on the epidemiology of the virus to date and suggest that its rate of spread is intermediate between that of seasonal flu and that of previous pandemic strains (3, 11). However, more precise estimates of R₀ will depend on better surveillance data in the future. The transmission phenotype of pandemic H1N1 viruses in a ferret model was also recently reported and was found to be similar to (16, 27) or less efficient (25) than that of seasonal H1N1 strains. The reason for this discrepancy in the ferret model is unclear.Importantly, in considering the human population, the impact of immunity against seasonal strains on the transmission potential of pandemic H1N1 viruses is not clear. According to conventional wisdom, an influenza virus must be of a hemagglutinin (HA) subtype which is novel to the human population in order to cause a pandemic (18, 38). Analysis of human sera collected from individuals with diverse influenza virus exposure histories has indicated that in those born in the early part of the 20th century, neutralizing activity against A/California/04/09 (Cal/04/09) virus is often present (16). Conversely, serological analyses of ferret postinfection sera (13) and human pre- and postvaccination sera (4a) revealed that neutralizing antibodies against recently circulating human H1N1 viruses do not react with pandemic H1N1 isolates. These serological findings may explain the relatively small number of cases seen to date in individuals greater than 65 years of age (6). Even in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, however, a measure of immune protection sufficient to dampen transmission may be present in a host who has recently experienced seasonal influenza (10). If, on the other hand, transmission is high and immunity is low, then pandemic H1N1 strains will likely continue to spread rapidly through the population. In this situation, a range of pharmaceutical interventions will be needed to dampen the public health impact of the pandemic.Herein we used the guinea pig model (4, 21-24, 26, 30) to assess the transmissibility of the pandemic H1N1 strains Cal/04/09 and A/Netherlands/602/09 (NL/602/09) relative to that of previous human and swine influenza viruses. To better mimic the human situation, we then tested whether the efficiency of transmission is decreased by preexisting immunity to recent human H1N1 or H3N2 influenza viruses. Finally, we assessed the efficacy of intranasal treatment with type I interferon (IFN) in limiting the replication and transmission of pandemic H1N1 viruses.     

Evolutionary Dynamics of Multiple Sublineages of H5N1 Influenza Viruses in Nigeria from 2006 to 2008

Highly pathogenic A/H5N1 avian influenza (HPAI H5N1) viruses have seriously affected the Nigerian poultry industry since early 2006. Previous studies have identified multiple introductions of the virus into Nigeria and several reassortment events between cocirculating lineages. To determine the spatial, evolutionary, and population dynamics of the multiple H5N1 lineages cocirculating in Nigeria, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of whole-genome sequences from 106 HPAI H5N1 viruses isolated between 2006 and 2008 and representing all 25 Nigerian states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) reporting outbreaks. We identified a major new subclade in Nigeria that is phylogenetically distinguishable from all previously identified sublineages, as well as two novel reassortment events. A detailed analysis of viral phylogeography identified two major source populations for the HPAI H5N1 virus in Nigeria, one in a major commercial poultry area (southwest region) and one in northern Nigeria, where contact between wild birds and backyard poultry is frequent. These findings suggested that migratory birds from Eastern Europe or Russia may serve an important role in the introduction of HPAI H5N1 viruses into Nigeria, although virus spread through the movement of poultry and poultry products cannot be excluded. Our study provides new insight into the genesis and evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in Nigeria and has important implications for targeting surveillance efforts to rapidly identify the spread of the virus into and within Nigeria.Since its emergence in 1996 in Guangdong, China, highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype (HPAI H5N1 virus) has disseminated widely across Asia, Europe, and Africa, infecting a range of domestic and wild avian species and sporadically spilling over into humans and other mammals (4, 35). Over time, the HPAI H5N1 virus has diversified into multiple phylogenetically distinct lineages, classified as clades 0 to 9 according to the unified nomenclature system (33). The H5N1 lineage currently circulating in central Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and Africa is referred to as clade 2.2 (33) and has also been described as “EMA” or Qinghai-like in previous publications (4, 17, 27). This clade originated in April 2005 during a large outbreak of a phylogenetically distinct H5N1 virus among wild bird populations at Qinghai Lake in western China (4, 17) and rapidly spread west through central Asia and Europe, eventually reaching Africa in 2006 (27). Clade 2.2 has further diversified, forming the genetic third-order clade 2.2.1 (32) and three genetically distinct sublineages (I, II, and III) (2, 19, 28), all of which are found in Africa.Since 2006 HPAI H5N1 viruses belonging to clade 2.2 have disseminated across multiple countries in western, eastern, and northern Africa: Egypt, Niger, Cameroon, Sudan, Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Togo, Benin, and Nigeria (2). With a large poultry industry, estimated at 140 million birds (11), Nigeria has experienced several major outbreaks of HPAI H5N1 virus, posing a serious threat to food security and public health in Africa. The first case of HPAI H5N1 virus in Nigeria (sublineage I) occurred in January 2006 in the state of Kaduna, and the virus subsequently was detected in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Sudan (2). In February 2006 sublineage II was reported in Nigeria, and it disseminated widely across the country during 2006 and 2007, also appearing in Togo (2). Clade 2.2.1, which has been prevalent in Egypt, Israel, and the Gaza Strip from 2006 to 2008, was also detected in Nigeria in 2006 (10).By the end of 2007, outbreaks of HPAI H5N1 virus in Nigeria appeared to have been successfully controlled by measures such as “stamping out with compensation,” restrictions on movement of poultry, and enhanced surveillance (13). However, in July 2008 new cases of HPAI H5N1 from a sublineage never previously detected in Africa (sublineage III) were registered in the Nigerian states of Kano and Katsina and in live bird markets in Gombe and Kebbi states (13, 21). Hence, Nigeria is the only African country where viruses belonging to clade 2.2.1 and to three different sublineages (I, II, and III) of clade 2.2 have all been detected. At least three different reassortment events between sublineages have been documented in Nigeria. Salzberg et al. identified the first reassortant strain (which we refer to as “R1”), in which four genome segments (hemagglutinin [HA], NP, NS, and PB1) belong to sublineage I and the other four segments (NA, MP, PA, and PB2) are derived from sublineage II (27). Subsequently, phylogenetic analysis showed that a 2007 reassortant strain (which we refer to as “R3”) contained the HA and NS segments from sublineage I and the other six segments from sublineage II (19, 22). Another reassortant virus (which we refer to as “R5”) contained only the NS gene segment from sublineage I, while the other seven segments were derived from sublineage II (22).Although the genetic diversity of the Nigerian HPAI H5N1 virus population has been well characterized, including multiple introductions of the virus into Nigeria and several reassortment events, little is known about the evolutionary and population growth dynamics of the virus within Nigeria. Particularly understudied are the spatial movements of individual sublineages among Nigeria''s vast poultry population. To explore the spatial, evolutionary, and population dynamics of the multiple H5N1 lineages cocirculating in Nigeria, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of whole-genome sequences from 106 HPAI H5N1 viruses isolated between 2006 and 2008 and representing all 25 Nigerian states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) reporting outbreaks. Using the exact date and location of collection for each viral isolate, we inferred from their phylogenetic relationships the directionality of viral gene flow among Nigerian states and identified critical regions that are likely to serve as key sources for the H5N1 virus in Nigeria.     

Competitive Fitness of Oseltamivir-Sensitive and -Resistant Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Viruses in a Ferret Model

The fitness of oseltamivir-resistant highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses has important clinical implications. We generated recombinant human A/Vietnam/1203/04 (VN; clade 1) and A/Turkey/15/06 (TK; clade 2.2) influenza viruses containing the H274Y neuraminidase (NA) mutation, which confers resistance to NA inhibitors, and compared the fitness levels of the wild-type (WT) and resistant virus pairs in ferrets. The VN-H274Y and VN-WT viruses replicated to similar titers in the upper respiratory tract (URT) and caused comparable disease signs, and none of the animals survived. On days 1 to 3 postinoculation, disease signs caused by oseltamivir-resistant TK-H274Y virus were milder than those caused by TK-WT virus, and all animals survived. We then studied fitness by using a novel approach. We coinoculated ferrets with different ratios of oseltamivir-resistant and -sensitive H5N1 viruses and measured the proportion of clones in day-6 nasal washes that contained the H274Y NA mutation. Although the proportion of VN-H274Y clones increased consistently, that of TK-H274Y virus decreased. Mutations within NA catalytic (R292K) and framework (E119A/K, I222L, H274L, and N294S) sites or near the NA enzyme active site (V116I, I117T/V, Q136H, K150N, and A250T) emerged spontaneously (without drug pressure) in both pairs of viruses. The NA substitutions I254V and E276A could exert a compensatory effect on the fitness of VN-H274Y and TK-H274Y viruses. NA enzymatic function was reduced in both drug-resistant H5N1 viruses. These results show that the H274Y NA mutation affects the fitness of two H5N1 influenza viruses differently. Our novel method of assessing viral fitness accounts for both virus-host interactions and virus-virus interactions within the host.The neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (orally administered oseltamivir and inhaled zanamivir) are currently an important class of antiviral drugs available for the treatment of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Although administration of NA inhibitors may significantly reduce influenza virus transmission, it risks the emergence of drug-resistant variants (16, 32). The impact of drug resistance would depend on the fitness (i.e., infectivity in vitro and virulence and transmissibility in vivo) of the resistant virus. If the resistance mutation only modestly reduces the virus'' biological fitness and does not impair its replication efficiency and transmissibility, the effectiveness of antiviral treatment can be significantly impaired. The unexpected natural emergence and spread of oseltamivir-resistant variants (carrying the H274Y NA amino acid substitution) among seasonal H1N1 influenza viruses of the A/Brisbane/59/07 lineage demonstrated that drug-resistant viruses can be highly fit and transmissible in humans (11, 22, 29), although the fitness of these variants is not completely understood. They are hypothesized to have lower NA receptor affinity and more-optimal NA and hemagglutinin (HA) functional balance than do wild-type (WT) viruses (38). Fortunately, oseltamivir-resistant variants have rarely been reported to occur among the novel pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses that emerged in April 2009; therefore, initial data suggest that currently circulating wild-type viruses possibly possess greater fitness than drug-resistant viruses (45), although only retrospective epidemiological data can provide a conclusive answer. The key questions are whether the risk posed by NA inhibitor-resistant viruses can be assessed experimentally and what the most reliable approach may be.All NA inhibitor-resistant influenza viruses characterized to date have contained specific mutations in the NA molecule. Clinically derived drug-resistant viruses have carried mutations that are NA subtype specific and differ in accordance with the NA inhibitor used (12, 35). The most commonly observed mutations are H274Y and N294S in the influenza A N1 NA subtype, E119A/G/D/V and R292K in the N2 NA subtype, and R152K and D198N in influenza B viruses (35, 36). The fitness of NA inhibitor-resistant viruses has been studied in vitro and in vivo. Many groups have assessed their replicative capacity in MDCK cells, but this assay system can yield anomalous results (49), particularly in the case of low-passage clinical isolates. The mismatch between virus specificity and cellular receptors can be overcome by using cell lines engineered to express human-like α-2,6-linked sialyl cell surface receptors (MDCK-SIAT1) (15, 34) or a novel cell culture-based system that morphologically and functionally recapitulates differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells (24). Investigations in vivo typically compare replication efficiencies, clinical signs, and transmissibility levels between oseltamivir-resistant viruses and the corresponding wild-type virus. Initial studies found that NA inhibitor-resistant influenza viruses were severely compromised in vitro and in animal models (6, 17, 26) and thus led to the idea that resistant viruses will unlikely have an impact on epidemic and pandemic influenza. However, clinically derived H1N1 virus with the H274Y NA mutation (18) and reverse genetics-derived H3N2 virus with the E119V NA mutation (46) were subsequently found to possess biological fitness and transmissibility similar to those of drug-sensitive virus in direct-contact ferrets. Recent studies in a guinea pig model showed that recombinant human H3N2 influenza viruses carrying either a single E119V NA mutation or the double NA mutation E119V-I222V were transmitted efficiently by direct contact but not by aerosol (5).There is limited information about the fitness of NA inhibitor-resistant H5N1 influenza viruses. Although they are not efficiently transmitted from human to human, their pandemic potential remains a serious public health concern because of their virulence in humans (1, 4, 7). H5N1 viruses isolated from untreated patients are susceptible to the NA inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir (21), although oseltamivir-resistant variants with the H274Y NA mutation have been reported to occur in five patients after (9, 30) or before (41) treatment with oseltamivir. The World Health Organization reported the isolation of two oseltamivir-resistant H5N1 viruses from an Egyptian girl and her uncle (44) after oseltamivir treatment. The virus was moderately resistant and possessed an N294S NA mutation. Preliminary evidence suggests that the resistance mutation existed before transmission of the virus from birds to the patients and thus before initiation of treatment (41). We previously showed that wild-type A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) influenza virus and recombinants carrying either the H274Y or the N294S NA mutation reached comparable titers in MDCK and MDCK-SIAT1 cells and caused comparable mortality rates among BALB/c mice (48). In contrast, clinically derived A/Hanoi/30408/05 (H5N1) influenza virus with the H274Y NA mutation reproduced to lower titers than the oseltamivir-sensitive virus in the lungs of inoculated ferrets (30).In a ferret model, we compared the fitness levels of two pairs of H5N1 viruses in the absence of selective drug pressure. One virus of each pair was the wild type, while the other carried the H274Y NA mutation conferring oseltamivir resistance. The two viruses used, A/Vietnam/1203/04 (HA clade 1) and A/Turkey/15/06 (HA clade 2.2), differ in their pathogenicity to ferrets. Virus fitness was evaluated by two approaches. Using the traditional approach, we compared clinical disease signs, relative inactivity indexes, weight and temperature changes, and virus replication levels in the upper respiratory tract (URT). We then used a novel competitive fitness approach in which we genetically analyzed individual virus clones after coinfection of ferrets with mixtures of oseltamivir-sensitive and -resistant H5N1 viruses; thus, we determined virus-virus interactions within the host. We observed no difference between the resistant and sensitive virus of each pair in clinical signs or virus replication in the URT; however, analysis of virus-virus interactions within the host showed that the H274Y NA mutation affected the fitness of the two viruses differently. The oseltamivir-resistant A/Vietnam/1203/04-like virus outgrew its wild-type counterpart, while the oseltamivir-resistant A/Turkey/15/06-like virus showed less fitness than its wild-type counterpart.     

Insertion of a Multibasic Cleavage Motif into the Hemagglutinin of a Low-Pathogenic Avian Influenza H6N1 Virus Induces a Highly Pathogenic Phenotype

The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus phenotype is restricted to influenza A viruses of the H5 and H7 hemagglutinin (HA) subtypes. To obtain more information on the apparent subtype-specific nature of the HPAI virus phenotype, a low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H6N1 virus was generated, containing an HPAI H5 RRRKKR↓G multibasic cleavage site (MBCS) motif in HA (the downward arrow indicates the site of cleavage). This insertion converted the LPAI virus phenotype into an HPAI virus phenotype in vitro and in vivo. The H6N1 virus with an MBCS displayed in vitro characteristics similar to those of HPAI H5 viruses, such as cleavage of HA₀ (the HA protein of influenza A virus initially synthesized as a single polypeptide precursor) and virus replication in the absence of exogenous trypsin. Studies of chickens confirmed the HPAI phenotype of the H6N1 virus with an MBCS, with an intravenous pathogenicity index of 1.4 and systemic virus replication upon intranasal inoculation, the hallmarks of HPAI viruses. This study provides evidence that the subtype-specific nature of the emergence of HPAI viruses is not at the molecular, structural, or functional level, since the introduction of an MBCS resulted in a fully functional virus with an HPAI virus genotype and phenotype.Wild birds represent the natural reservoir of avian influenza A viruses in nature (43). Influenza A viruses are classified on the basis of the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) surface glycoproteins. In wild birds throughout the world, influenza A viruses representing 16 HA and 9 NA antigenic subtypes have been found in numerous combinations (also called subtypes, e.g., H1N1, H6N1) (12). Besides classification based on the antigenic properties of HA and NA, avian influenza A viruses can also be classified based on their pathogenic phenotype in chickens. Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus, an acute generalized disease of poultry in which mortality may be as high as 100%, is restricted to subtypes H5 and H7. Other avian influenza A virus subtypes are generally low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses that cause much milder, primarily respiratory disease in poultry, sometimes with loss of egg production (6).The HA protein of influenza A virus is initially synthesized as a single polypeptide precursor (HA₀), which is cleaved into HA₁ and HA₂ subunits by host cell proteases. The mature HA protein mediates binding of the virus to host cells, followed by endocytosis and HA-mediated fusion with endosomal membranes (43). Influenza viruses of subtypes H5 and H7 may become highly pathogenic after introduction into poultry and cause outbreaks of HPAI. The switch from an LPAI phenotype to the HPAI phenotype of these H5 and H7 influenza A viruses is achieved by the introduction of basic amino acid residues into the HA₀ cleavage site by substitution or insertion, resulting in the so-called multibasic cleavage site (MBCS), which facilitates systemic virus replication (4, 5, 14, 44). The cleavage of the HA₀ of LPAI viruses is restricted to trypsin-like proteases which recognize the XXX(R/K)↓G cleavage motif, where the downward arrow indicates the site of cleavage. Replication of these LPAI viruses is therefore restricted to sites in the host where these enzymes are expressed, i.e., the respiratory and intestinal tract (32, 38). The introduction of an RX(R/K)R↓G or R(R/K)XR↓G minimal MBCS motif into the H5 and H7 subtype viruses facilitates the recognition and cleavage of the HA₀ by ubiquitous proprotein convertases, such as furin (20, 32, 41, 45). H5 influenza A viruses with a minimal MBCS motif only have the highly pathogenic phenotype if the masking glycosylation site at position 11 in the HA is replaced by a nonglycosylation site. Otherwise, at least one additional basic amino acid has to be inserted to allow the shift from an LPAI virus phenotype to an HPAI virus phenotype to occur (15, 18, 21, 22, 28). No information is available on the minimal prerequisites of H7 influenza A viruses to become highly pathogenic, but all HPAI H7 viruses have at least 2 basic amino acid insertions in the HA₀ cleavage site (22). HA₀ with the MBCS is activated in a broad range of different host cells and therefore enables HPAI viruses to replicate systemically in poultry (46). To date, little is known about the apparent subtype-specific nature of the introduction of the MBCS into LPAI viruses and the evolutionary processes involved in the emergence of HPAI viruses. When an MBCS was introduced in a laboratory-adapted strain of influenza virus, A/Duck/Ukraine/1/1963 (H3N8), it did not result in a dramatic change in pathogenic phenotype (35). Here, the effect of the introduction of an MBCS into a primary LPAI H6N1 virus, A/Mallard/Sweden/81/2002, is described. The introduction of an MBCS resulted in trypsin-independent replication in vitro and enhanced pathogenesis in a chicken model. Understanding the basis of the HA subtype specificity of the introduction of an MBCS into avian influenza viruses will lead to a better understanding of potential molecular restrictions involved in emergence of HPAI outbreaks.