G Proteins in Reverse Mode: RECEPTOR-MEDIATED GTP RELEASE INHIBITS G PROTEIN AND EFFECTOR FUNCTION*

Active G protein-coupled receptors activate heterotrimeric Gαβγ proteins by catalyzing the exchange of GDP by GTP at the Gα subunit. A paradoxical attenuation of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRK) upon stimulation of native cells with high concentrations of agonist is known. However, a deactivation of activated G proteins by active receptors has not been experimentally studied in intact cells. We monitored GIRK currents and G_o protein activation by means of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in parallel. The results suggested that GIRK currents were paradoxically attenuated due to an inactivation of G_o proteins by active α_2A-adrenergic receptors. To study the mechanisms, G protein activation and receptor-G protein interactions were analyzed as a function of nucleotide type and nucleotide concentrations by means of FRET, while controlling intracellular nucleotides upon permeabilization of the cell membrane. Results suggested a receptor-catalyzed dissociation of GTP from activated heterotrimeric Gαβγ. Consequently, nucleotide-free G proteins were sequestrated in heterotrimeric conformation at the active receptor, thus attenuating downstream signaling in an agonist-dependent manner.     

The Proline-rich N-terminal Domain of G18 Exhibits a Novel G Protein Regulatory Function

The protein G18 (also known as AGS4 or GPSM3) contains three conserved GoLoco/GPR domains in its central and C-terminal regions that bind to inactive Gα_i, whereas the N-terminal region has not been previously characterized. We investigated whether this domain might itself regulate G protein activity by assessing the abilities of G18 and mutants thereof to modulate the nucleotide binding and hydrolytic properties of Gα_i1 and Gα_o. Surprisingly, in the presence of fluoroaluminate (AlF₄⁻) both G proteins bound strongly to full-length G18 (G18wt) and to its isolated N-terminal domain (G18ΔC) but not to its GoLoco region (ΔNG18). Thus, it appears that its N-terminal domain promotes G18 binding to fluoroaluminate-activated Gα_i/o. Neither G18wt nor any G18 mutant affected the GTPase activity of Gα_i1 or Gα_o. In contrast, complex effects were noted with respect to nucleotide binding. As inferred by the binding of [³⁵S]GTPγS (guanosine 5′-O-[γ-thio]triphosphate) to Gα_i1, the isolated GoLoco region as expected acted as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, whereas the N-terminal region exhibited a previously unknown guanine nucleotide exchange factor effect on this G protein. On the other hand, the N terminus inhibited [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to Gα_o, albeit to a lesser extent than the effect of the GoLoco region on Gα_i1. Taken together, our results identify the N-terminal region of G18 as a novel G protein-interacting domain that may have distinct regulatory effects within the G_i/o subfamily, and thus, it could potentially play a role in differentiating signals between these related G proteins.     

G Protein �¦� Subunits Regulate Cell Adhesion through Rap1a and Its Effector Radil

The activation of several G protein-coupled receptors is known to regulate the adhesive properties of cells in different contexts. Here, we reveal that Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins regulate cell-matrix adhesiveness by activating Rap1a-dependent inside-out signals and integrin activation. We show that Gβγ subunits enter in a protein complex with activated Rap1a and its effector Radil and establish that this complex is required downstream of receptor stimulation for the activation of integrins and the positive modulation of cell-matrix adhesiveness. Moreover, we demonstrate that Gβγ and activated Rap1a promote the translocation of Radil to the plasma membrane at sites of cell-matrix contacts. These results add to the molecular understanding of how G protein-coupled receptors impinge on cell adhesion and suggest that the Gβγ·Rap1·Radil complex plays important roles in this process.     

G��i and G�¦� Jointly Regulate the Conformations of a G�¦� Effector, the Neuronal G Protein-activated K+ Channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K⁺ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gα_i/o. Whether and how Gα_i/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gα_i3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gα_i3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gα_i3^GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gα_i3^GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gα_i3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gα_i3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gα_i3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between Gα_i^GTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gα_i/o and the Gα_iβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.     

Membrane Anchor R9AP Potentiates GTPase-accelerating Protein Activity of RGS11��G��5 Complex and Accelerates Inactivation of the mGluR6-Go Signaling

The R7 subfamily of RGS proteins critically regulates neuronal G protein-signaling pathways that are essential for vision, nociception, motor coordination, and reward processing. A member of the R7 RGS family, RGS11, is a GTPase-accelerating protein specifically expressed in retinal ON-bipolar cells where it forms complexes with the atypical G protein β subunit, Gβ₅, and transmembrane protein R9AP. Association with R9AP has been shown to be critical for the proteolytic stability of the complex in the retina. In this study we report that R9AP can in addition stimulate the GTPase-accelerating protein activity of the RGS11·Gβ₅ complex at Gα_o. Single turnover GTPase assays reveal that R9AP co-localizes RGS11·Gβ₅ and Gα_o on the membrane and allosterically potentiates the GTPase-accelerating function of RGS11·Gβ₅. Reconstitution of mGluR6-Gα_o signaling in Xenopus oocytes indicates that RGS11·Gβ₅-mediated GTPase acceleration in this system requires co-expression of R9AP. The results provide new insight into the regulation of mGluR6-Gα_o signaling by the RGS11·Gβ₅·R9AP complex and establish R9AP as a general GTPase-accelerating protein activity regulator of R7 RGS complexes.     

Nucleobindin 1 Is a Calcium-regulated Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitor of Gαi1

Nucleobindin 1 (NUCB1) is a widely expressed multidomain calcium-binding protein whose precise physiological and biochemical functions are not well understood. We engineered and heterologously expressed a soluble form of NUCB1 (sNUCB1) and characterized its biophysical and biochemical properties. We show that sNUCB1 exists as a dimer in solution and that each monomer binds two divalent calcium cations. Calcium binding causes conformational changes in sNUCB1 as judged by circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy experiments. Earlier reports suggested that NUCB1 might interact with heterotrimeric G protein α subunits. We show that dimeric calcium-free sNUCB1 binds to expressed Gα_i1 and that calcium binding inhibits the interaction. The binding of sNUCB1 to Gα_i1 inhibits its basal rate of GDP release and slows its rate and extent of GTPγS uptake. Additionally, our tissue culture experiments show that sNUCB1 prevents receptor-mediated Gα_i-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Thus, we conclude that sNUCB1 is a calcium-dependent guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) for Gα_i1. To our knowledge, sNUCB1 is the first example of a calcium-dependent GDI for heterotrimeric G proteins. We also show that the mechanism of GDI activity of sNUCB1 is unique and does not arise from the consensus GoLoco motif found in RGS proteins. We propose that cytoplasmic NUCB1 might function to regulate heterotrimeric G protein trafficking and G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways.     

Differentiation of Human T Cells Alters Their Repertoire of G Protein α-Subunits

Because T cell differentiation leads to an expanded repertoire of chemokine receptors, a subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors, we hypothesized that the repertoire of G proteins might be altered in parallel. We analyzed the abundance of mRNA and/or protein of six G protein α-subunits in human CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell subsets from blood. Although most G protein α-subunits were similarly expressed in all subsets, the abundance of Gα_o, a protein not previously described in hematopoietic cells, was much higher in memory versus naive cells. Consistent with these data, activation of naive CD4⁺ T cells in vitro significantly increased the abundance of Gα_o in cells stimulated under nonpolarizing or T_H17 (but not T_H1 or T_H2)-polarizing conditions. In functional studies, the use of a chimeric G protein α-subunit, Gα_qo5, demonstrated that chemokine receptors could couple to Gα_o-containing G proteins. We also found that Gα_i1, another α-subunit not described previously in leukocytes, was expressed in naive T cells but virtually absent from memory subsets. Corresponding to their patterns of expression, siRNA-mediated knockdown of Gα_o in memory (but not naive) and Gα_i1 in naive (but not memory) CD4⁺ T cells inhibited chemokine-dependent migration. Moreover, although even in Gα_o- and Gα_i1-expressing cells mRNAs of these α-subunits were much less abundant than Gα_i2 or Gα_i3, knockdown of any of these subunits impaired chemokine receptor-mediated migration similarly. Together, our data reveal a change in the repertoire of Gα_i/o subunits during T cell differentiation and suggest functional equivalence among Gα_i/o subunits irrespective of their relative abundance.     

G��q-mediated Activation of GRK2 by Mechanical Stretch in Cardiac Myocytes: THE ROLE OF PROTEIN KINASE C*

G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2) is a critical regulator of β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling and cardiac function. We studied the effects of mechanical stretch, a potent stimulus for cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, on GRK2 activity and β-AR signaling. To eliminate neurohormonal influences, neonatal rat ventricular myocytes were subjected to cyclical equi-biaxial stretch. A hypertrophic response was confirmed by “fetal” gene up-regulation. GRK2 activity in cardiac myocytes was increased 4.2-fold at 48 h of stretch versus unstretched controls. Adenylyl cyclase activity was blunted in sarcolemmal membranes after stretch, demonstrating β-AR desensitization. The hypertrophic response to mechanical stretch is mediated primarily through the Gα_q-coupled angiotensin II AT₁ receptor leading to activation of protein kinase C (PKC). PKC is known to phosphorylate GRK2 at the N-terminal serine 29 residue, leading to kinase activation. Overexpression of a mini-gene that inhibits receptor-Gα_q coupling blunted stretch-induced hypertrophy and GRK2 activation. Short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of PKCα also significantly attenuated stretch-induced GRK2 activation. Overexpression of a GRK2 mutant (S29A) in cardiac myocytes inhibited phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKC, abolished stretch-induced GRK2 activation, and restored adenylyl cyclase activity. Cardiac-specific activation of PKCα in transgenic mice led to impaired β-agonist-stimulated ventricular function, blunted cyclase activity, and increased GRK2 phosphorylation and activity. Phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKC appears to be the primary mechanism of increased GRK2 activity and impaired β-AR signaling after mechanical stretch. Cross-talk between hypertrophic signaling at the level of PKC and β-AR signaling regulated by GRK2 may be an important mechanism in the transition from compensatory ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure.     

Assembly and Function of the Regulator of G protein Signaling 14 (RGS14)·H-Ras Signaling Complex in Live Cells Are Regulated by Gαi1 and Gαi-linked G Protein-coupled Receptors

Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) is a multifunctional scaffolding protein that integrates heterotrimeric G protein and H-Ras signaling pathways. RGS14 possesses an RGS domain that binds active Gα_i/o-GTP subunits to promote GTP hydrolysis and a G protein regulatory (GPR) motif that selectively binds inactive Gα_i1/3-GDP subunits to form a stable heterodimer at cellular membranes. RGS14 also contains two tandem Ras/Rap binding domains (RBDs) that bind H-Ras. Here we show that RGS14 preferentially binds activated H-Ras-GTP in live cells to enhance H-Ras cellular actions and that this interaction is regulated by inactive Gα_i1-GDP and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) in live cells, we show that RGS14-Luciferase and active H-Ras(G/V)-Venus exhibit a robust BRET signal at the plasma membrane that is markedly enhanced in the presence of inactive Gα_i1-GDP but not active Gα_i1-GTP. Active H-Ras(G/V) interacts with a native RGS14·Gα_i1 complex in brain lysates, and co-expression of RGS14 and Gα_i1 in PC12 cells greatly enhances H-Ras(G/V) stimulatory effects on neurite outgrowth. Stimulation of the Gα_i-linked α_2A-adrenergic receptor induces a conformational change in the Gα_i1·RGS14·H-Ras(G/V) complex that may allow subsequent regulation of the complex by other binding partners. Together, these findings indicate that inactive Gα_i1-GDP enhances the affinity of RGS14 for H-Ras-GTP in live cells, resulting in a ternary signaling complex that is further regulated by GPCRs.     

GLP-1 Mediates Antiapoptotic Effect by Phosphorylating Bad through a ��-Arrestin 1-mediated ERK1/2 Activation in Pancreatic ��-Cells

Strategies based on activating GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) are intensively developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The exhaustive knowledge of the signaling pathways linked to activated GLP-1R within the β-cells is of major importance. In β-cells, GLP-1 activates the ERK1/2 cascade by diverse pathways dependent on either Gα_s/cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or β-arrestin 1, a scaffold protein. Using pharmacological inhibitors, β-arrestin 1 small interfering RNA, and islets isolated from β-arrestin 1 knock-out mice, we demonstrate that GLP-1 stimulates ERK1/2 by two temporally distinct pathways. The PKA-dependent pathway mediates rapid and transient ERK1/2 phosphorylation that leads to nuclear translocation of the activated kinases. In contrast, the β-arrestin 1-dependent pathway produces a late ERK1/2 activity that is restricted to the β-cell cytoplasm. We further observe that GLP-1 phosphorylates the cytoplasmic proapoptotic protein Bad at Ser-112 but not at Ser-155. We find that the β-arrestin 1-dependent ERK1/2 activation engaged by GLP-1 mediates the Ser-112 phosphorylation of Bad, through p90RSK activation, allowing the association of Bad with the scaffold protein 14-3-3, leading to its inactivation. β-Arrestin 1 is further found to mediate the antiapoptotic effect of GLP-1 in β-cells through the ERK1/2-p90RSK-phosphorylation of Bad. This new regulatory mechanism engaged by activated GLP-1R involving a β-arrestin 1-dependent spatiotemporal regulation of the ERK1/2-p90RSK activity is now suspected to participate in the protection of β-cells against apoptosis. Such signaling mechanism may serve as a prototype to generate new therapeutic GLP-1R ligands.     

Do Caveolae Have a Role in the Fidelity and Dynamics of Receptor Activation of G-protein-gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels?

In atrial and nodal cardiac myocytes, M2 muscarinic receptors activate inhibitory G-proteins (G_i/o), which in turn stimulate G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels through direct binding of the Gβγ subunit. Despite also releasing Gβγ, G_s-coupled receptors such as the β-adrenergic receptor are not able to prominently activate this current. An appealing hypothesis would be if components were sequestered in membrane domains such as caveolae/rafts. Using biochemical fractionation followed by Western blotting and/or radioligand binding experiments, we examined the distribution of the components in stable HEK293 and HL-1 cells, which natively express the transduction cascade. The channel, M2 muscarinic, and A1 adenosine receptors were located in noncaveolar/nonraft fractions. G_iα_1/2 was enriched in both caveolar/raft and noncaveolar/nonraft fractions. In contrast, G_sα was only enriched in caveolar/raft fractions. We constructed YFP-tagged caveolin-2 (YFP-Cav2) and chimeras with the M2 (M2-YFP-Cav2) and A1 (A1-YFP-Cav2) receptors. Analysis of gradient fractions showed that these receptor chimeras were now localized to caveolae-enriched fractions. Microscopy showed that M2-YFP and A1-YFP had a diffuse homogenous membrane signal. YFP-Cav2, M2-YFP-Cav2, and A1-YFP-Cav2 revealed a more punctuate pattern. Finally, we looked at the consequences for signaling. Activation via M2-YFP-Cav2 or A1-YFP-Cav2 revealed substantially slower kinetics compared with M2-YFP or A1-YFP and was reversed by the addition of methyl-β-cyclodextrin. Thus the localization of the channel signal transduction cascade in non-cholesterol rich domains substantially enhances the speed of signaling. The presence of G_sα solely in caveolae may account for signaling selectivity between G_i/o and G_s-coupled receptors.     

Molecular Basis of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Coupling to the G Protein Heterotrimer Gαiβγ: IDENTIFICATION OF KEY CB1 CONTACTS WITH THE C-TERMINAL HELIX α5 OF Gαi*

The cannabinoid (CB1) receptor is a member of the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. The human CB1 receptor, which is among the most expressed receptors in the brain, has been implicated in several disease states, including drug addiction, anxiety, depression, obesity, and chronic pain. Different classes of CB1 agonists evoke signaling pathways through the activation of specific subtypes of G proteins. The molecular basis of CB1 receptor coupling to its cognate G protein is unknown. As a first step toward understanding CB1 receptor-mediated G protein signaling, we have constructed a ternary complex structural model of the CB1 receptor and G_i heterotrimer (CB1-G_i), guided by the x-ray structure of β₂-adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) in complex with G_s (β₂AR-G_s), through 824-ns duration molecular dynamics simulations in a fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayer environment. We identified a group of residues at the juxtamembrane regions of the intracellular loops 2 and 3 (IC2 and IC3) of the CB1 receptor, including Ile-218^3.54, Tyr-224^IC2, Asp-338^6.30, Arg-340^6.32, Leu-341^6.33, and Thr-344^6.36, as potential key contacts with the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα_i. Ala mutations of these residues at the receptor-G_i interface resulted in little G protein coupling activity, consistent with the present model of the CB1-G_i complex, which suggests tight interactions between CB1 and the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα_i. The model also suggests that unique conformational changes in the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα play a crucial role in the receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

G protein activation by serotonin type 4 receptor dimers: evidence that turning on two protomers is more efficient

The discovery that class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function as obligatory dimeric entities has generated major interest in GPCR oligomerization. Oligomerization now appears to be a common feature among all GPCR classes. However, the functional significance of this process remains unclear because, in vitro, some monomeric GPCRs, such as rhodopsin and β(2)-adrenergic receptors, activate G proteins. By using wild type and mutant serotonin type 4 receptors (5-HT(4)Rs) (including a 5-HT(4)-RASSL) expressed in COS-7 cells as models of class A GPCRs, we show that activation of one protomer in a dimer was sufficient to stimulate G proteins. However, coupling efficiency was 2 times higher when both protomers were activated. Expression of combinations of 5-HT(4), in which both protomers were able to bind to agonists but only one could couple to G proteins, suggested that upon agonist occupancy, protomers did not independently couple to G proteins but rather that only one G protein was activated. Coupling of a single heterotrimeric G(s) protein to a receptor dimer was further confirmed in vitro, using the purified recombinant WT RASSL 5-HT(4)R obligatory heterodimer. These results, together with previous findings, demonstrate that, differently from class C GPCR dimers, class A GPCR dimers have pleiotropic activation mechanisms.     

Rab8 Interacts with Distinct Motifs in α2B- and β2-Adrenergic Receptors and Differentially Modulates Their Transport

The molecular mechanism underlying the post-Golgi transport of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains poorly understood. Here we determine the role of Rab8 GTPase, which modulates vesicular protein transport between the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and the plasma membrane, in the cell surface targeting of α_2B- and β₂-adrenergic receptors (AR). Transient expression of GDP- and GTP-bound Rab8 mutants and short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of Rab8 more potently inhibited the cell surface expression of α_2B-AR than β₂-AR. The GDP-bound Rab8(T22N) mutant attenuated ERK1/2 activation by α_2B-AR, but not β₂-AR, and arrested α_2B-AR in the TGN compartment. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that both α_2B-AR and β₂-AR physically interacted with Rab8 and glutathione S-transferase fusion protein pulldown assays demonstrated that Rab8 interacted with the C termini of both receptors. Interestingly, mutation of the highly conserved membrane-proximal C terminus dileucine motif selectively blocked β₂-AR interaction with Rab8, whereas mutation of residues Val⁴³¹-Phe⁴³²-Asn⁴³³-Gln⁴³⁴, Pro⁴⁴⁷-Trp⁴⁴⁸, Gln⁴⁵⁰-Thr⁴⁵¹, and Trp⁴⁵³ in the C terminus impaired α_2B-AR interaction with Rab8. Furthermore, transport inhibition by Rab8(T22N) of a chimeric β₂-AR carrying the α_2B-AR C terminus was similar to α_2B-AR. These data provide strong evidence indicating that Rab8 GTPase interacts with distinct motifs in the C termini of α_2B-AR and β₂-AR and differentially modulates their traffic from the TGN to the cell surface.     

Recruitment of a Cytoplasmic Chaperone Relay by the A2A Adenosine Receptor

The adenosine A_2A receptor is a prototypical rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor but has several unique structural features, in particular a long C terminus (of >120 residues) devoid of a palmitoylation site. It is known to interact with several accessory proteins other than those canonically involved in signaling. However, it is evident that many more proteins must interact with the A_2A receptor, if the trafficking trajectory of the receptor is taken into account from its site of synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to its disposal by the lysosome. Affinity-tagged versions of the A_2A receptor were expressed in HEK293 cells to identify interacting partners residing in the ER by a proteomics approach based on tandem affinity purification. The receptor-protein complexes were purified in quantities sufficient for analysis by mass spectrometry. We identified molecular chaperones (heat-shock proteins HSP90α and HSP70-1A) that interact with and retain partially folded A_2A receptor prior to ER exit. Complex formation between the A_2A receptor and HSP90α (but not HSP90β) and HSP70-1A was confirmed by co-affinity precipitation. HSP90 inhibitors also enhanced surface expression of the receptor in PC12 cells, which endogenously express the A_2A receptor. Finally, proteins of the HSP relay machinery (e.g. HOP/HSC70-HSP90 organizing protein and P23/HSP90 co-chaperone) were recovered in complexes with the A_2A receptor. These observations are consistent with the proposed chaperone/coat protein complex II exchange model. This posits that cytosolic HSP proteins are sequentially recruited to folding intermediates of the A_2A receptor. Release of HSP90 is required prior to recruitment of coat protein complex II components. This prevents premature ER export of partially folded receptors.     

Phosphorylation of Protease-activated Receptor-2 Differentially Regulates Desensitization and Internalization

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a G protein-coupled receptor irreversibly activated by extracellular proteases. Activated PAR2 couples to multiple heterotrimeric G-protein subtypes including Gα_q, Gα_i, and Gα_12/13. Most activated G protein-coupled receptors are rapidly desensitized and internalized following phosphorylation and β-arrestin binding. However, the role of phosphorylation in regulation of PAR2 signaling and trafficking is not known. To investigate the function of phosphorylation, we generated a PAR2 mutant in which all serines and threonines in the C-tail were converted to alanines and designated it PAR2 0P. In mammalian cells, the addition of agonist induced a rapid and robust increase in phosphorylation of wild-type PAR2 but not the 0P mutant, suggesting that the major sites of phosphorylation occur within the C-tail domain. Moreover, desensitization of PAR2 0P signaling was markedly impaired compared with the wild-type receptor. Wild-type phosphorylated PAR2 internalized through a canonical dynamin, clathrin- and β-arrestin-dependent pathway. Strikingly, PAR2 0P mutant internalization proceeded through a dynamin-dependent but clathrin- and β-arrestin-independent pathway in both a constitutive and agonist-dependent manner. Collectively, our studies show that PAR2 phosphorylation is essential for β-arrestin binding and uncoupling from heterotrimeric G-protein signaling and that the presence of serine and threonine residues in the PAR2 C-tail hinder constitutive internalization through a non-canonical pathway. Thus, our studies reveal a novel function for phosphorylation that differentially regulates PAR2 desensitization and endocytic trafficking.     

Dopamine D2 Receptor Relies upon PPM/PP2C Protein Phosphatases to Dephosphorylate Huntingtin Protein

Striatal dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) relies upon G protein- and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways to convey its action on motor control and behavior. Considering that D2R activation inhibits Akt in the striatum and that huntingtin physiological functions are affected by Akt phosphorylation, we sought to investigate whether D2R-mediated signaling could regulate huntingtin phosphorylation. We demonstrate that D2R activation decreases huntingtin phosphorylation on its Akt site. This dephosphorylation event depends upon the Gα_i-dependent engagement of specific members of the protein phosphatase metallo-dependent (PPM/PP2C) family and is independent of β-arrestin 2. These observations identify the PPM/PP2C family as a mediator of G protein-coupled receptor signaling and thereby suggest a novel mechanism of dopaminergic signaling.     

Evidence for a Second, High Affinity G�¦� Binding Site on G��i1(GDP) Subunits

It is well known that Gα_i1(GDP) binds strongly to Gβγ subunits to form the Gα_i1(GDP)-Gβγ heterotrimer, and that activation to Gα_i1(GTP) results in conformational changes that reduces its affinity for Gβγ subunits. Previous studies of G protein subunit interactions have used stoichiometric amounts of the proteins. Here, we have found that Gα_i1(GDP) can bind a second Gβγ subunit with an affinity only 10-fold weaker than the primary site and close to the affinity between activated Gα_i1 and Gβγ subunits. Also, we find that phospholipase Cβ2, an effector of Gβγ, does not compete with the second binding site implying that effectors can be bound to the Gα_i1(GDP)-(Gβγ)₂ complex. Biophysical measurements and molecular docking studies suggest that this second site is distant from the primary one. A synthetic peptide having a sequence identical to the putative second binding site on Gα_i1 competes with binding of the second Gβγ subunit. Injection of this peptide into cultured cells expressing eYFP-Gα_i1(GDP) and eCFP-Gβγ reduces the overall association of the subunits suggesting this site is operative in cells. We propose that this second binding site serves to promote and stabilize G protein subunit interactions in the presence of competing cellular proteins.The plasma membranes of cells are organized as a series of protein-rich and lipid-rich domains (1–3). Many of the protein-rich domains, in particular those organized by caveolin proteins, are thought to be complexes of functionally related proteins that transduce extracellular signals (2). There is increasing evidence that heterotrimeric G proteins exist in pre-formed membrane complexes with their receptors and their intracellular effectors (4–8).The G protein signaling system is initiated when an extracellular agonist binds to its specific G protein-coupled receptor (for review see Refs. 9–12). The ligand-bound receptor will then catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP on the Gα subunit in the G protein heterotrimer. In the basal state, Gα(GDP) binds strongly to Gβγ, but in the GTP-bound state this affinity is reduced, allowing Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits to individually bind to a host of specific intracellular enzymes and change their catalytic activity.Although the interactions between G protein subunits have been studied extensively in vitro, their behavior in cells may differ. For example, in pure or semi-pure systems, activation of Gα(GDP) sufficiently weakens its affinity for Gβγ resulting in dissociation (13). However, in cells separation of the heterotrimer is observed under some circumstances, but not others (7, 14–17). The reason for these differences in behavior is not clear. There are four families of Gα subunits that each contain several members, and, additionally, there are many subtypes of Gβγ subunits (18). It is possible that differences in dissociation behavior reflect differences in affinity between G protein subunit subtypes (19), the presence of various protein partners, and/or differences in post-synthetic modifications of the subunits (20).The mechanism that allows activated G proteins to remain bound is not apparent from the crystal structure (21, 22). If G protein subunits do not dissociate in cells, then their interaction must change in such a manner as to expose the effector interaction site(s). We have found that phospholipase Cβ1 (PLCβ1),⁴ an important effector of Gα_q (23), is bound to Gα_q prior to activation and throughout the activation cycle (6) implying that Gα_q(GDP) interacts with PLCβ1 in a non-functional manner.We have evidence that signaling complexes are stabilized by a series of secondary interactions. Using purified proteins and model membranes, we have found that membranes of the Gα_q-Gβγ/PLCβ1/RGS4 signaling system have secondary, weaker binding sites to members of this signaling system in addition to their high affinity site(s) to their functional partner(s). We speculate that secondary contacts allow for self-scaffolding of signaling proteins. To understand the nature of these secondary contacts, we have studied the ability of the Gα_i1(GDP)-Gβγ heterotrimer to remain complexed through the activation cycle (24). Here, we present evidence that Gα_i1(GDP) has two distinct Gβγ binding sites that only differ in affinity by an order of magnitude and may allow for continued association between the subunits upon activation. We also find that this site plays an important role in stabilizing G protein associations in cells and provides a mechanism of self-scaffolding.     

The structure and interactions of SpoIISA and SpoIISB, a toxin-antitoxin system in Bacillus subtilis

Spore formation in Bacillus subtilis begins with an asymmetric cell division, following which differential gene expression is established by alternative compartment-specific RNA polymerase σ factors. The spoIISAB operon of B. subtilis was identified as a locus whose mutation leads to increased activity of the first sporulation-specific sigma factor, σ^F. Inappropriate spoIISA expression causes lysis of vegetatively growing B. subtilis cells and Escherichia coli cells when expressed heterologously, effects that are countered by co-expression of spoIISB, identifying SpoIISA-SpoIISB as a toxin-antitoxin system. SpoIISA has three putative membrane-spanning segments and a cytoplasmic domain. Here, the crystal structure of a cytoplasmic fragment of SpoIISA (CSpoIISA) in complex with SpoIISB has been determined by selenomethionine-multiwavelength anomalous dispersion phasing to 2.5 Å spacing, revealing a CSpoIISA₂·SpoIISB₂ heterotetramer. CSpoIISA has a single domain α/β structure resembling a GAF domain with an extended α-helix at its N terminus. The two CSpoIISA protomers form extensive interactions through an intermolecular four-helix bundle. Each SpoIISB chain is highly extended and lacking tertiary structure. The SpoIISB chains wrap around the CSpoIISA dimer, forming extensive interactions with both CSpoIISA protomers. CD spectroscopy experiments indicate that SpoIISB is a natively disordered protein that adopts structure only in the presence of CSpoIISA, whereas surface plasmon resonance experiments revealed that the CSpoIISA·SpoIISB complex is stable with a dissociation constant in the nanomolar range. The results are interpreted in relation to sequence conservation and mutational data, and possible mechanisms of cell killing by SpoIISA are discussed.     

Function of phosducin-like proteins in G protein signaling and chaperone-assisted protein folding

Members of the phosducin gene family were initially proposed to act as down-regulators of G protein signaling by binding G protein βγ dimers (Gβγ) and inhibiting their ability to interact with G protein subunits (G) and effectors. However, recent findings have over-turned this hypothesis by showing that most members of the phosducin family act as co-chaperones with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to assist in the folding of a variety of proteins from their nascent polypeptides. In fact rather than inhibiting G protein pathways, phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) has been shown to be essential for G protein signaling by catalyzing the folding and assembly of the Gβγ dimer. PhLP2 and PhLP3 have no role in G protein signaling, but they appear to assist in the folding of proteins essential in regulating cell cycle progression as well as actin and tubulin. Phosducin itself is the only family member that does not participate with CCT in protein folding, but it is believed to have a specific role in visual signal transduction to chaperone Gβγ subunits as they translocate to and from the outer and inner segments of photoreceptor cells during light-adaptation.