Positive versus negative modulation of different endogenous chemokines for CC-chemokine receptor 1 by small molecule agonists through allosteric versus orthosteric binding

7 transmembrane-spanning (7TM) chemokine receptors having multiple endogenous ligands offer special opportunities to understand the molecular basis for allosteric mechanisms. Thus, CC-chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) binds CC-chemokine 3 and 5 (CCL3 and CCL5) with K(d) values of 7.3 and 0.16 nm, respectively, as determined in homologous competition binding assays. However, CCL5 appears to have a >10,000-fold lower affinity in competition against (125)I-CCL3. Mutational mapping revealed that CCL3 and CCL5 both are strongly affected by systematic truncations of the N-terminal extension, whereas only CCL5 and not CCL3 activation is affected by substitutions in the main ligand binding pocket including the conserved GluVII:06 anchor point. A series of metal ion chelator complexes were found to act as full agonists on CCR1 and to be critically affected by the same substitutions in the main ligand binding pocket as CCL5 but not by mutations in the extracellular domain. In agreement with the overlapping binding sites, the small non-peptide agonists displaced radiolabeled CCL5 with high affinity. Interestingly, the same compounds acted as allosteric enhancers of the binding of CCL3, with which they did not overlap in binding site, leading to an increased B(max) and affinity of this chemokine mainly due to an increased association rate. It is concluded that a small molecule agonist through binding deep in the main ligand binding pocket can act as an allosteric enhancer for one endogenous chemokine and at the same time as a competitive blocker of the binding of another endogenous chemokine.     

Cutting edge: identification of a novel chemokine receptor that binds dendritic cell- and T cell-active chemokines including ELC, SLC, and TECK

Searching for new receptors of dendritic cell- and T cell-active chemokines, we used a combination of techniques to interrogate orphan chemokine receptors. We report here on human CCX CKR, previously represented only by noncontiguous expressed sequence tags homologous to bovine PPR1, a putative gustatory receptor. We employed a two-tiered process of ligand assignment, where immobilized chemokines constructed on stalks (stalkokines) were used as bait for adhesion of cells expressing CCX CKR. These cells adhered to stalkokines representing ELC, a chemokine previously thought to bind only CCR7. Adhesion was abolished in the presence of soluble ELC, SLC (CCR7 ligands), and TECK (a CCR9 ligand). Complete ligand profiles were further determined by radiolabeled ligand binding and competition with >80 chemokines. ELC, SLC, and TECK comprised high affinity ligands (IC50 <15 nM); lower affinity ligands include BLC and vMIP-II (IC50 <150 nM). With its high affinity for CC chemokines and homology to CC receptors, we provisionally designate this new receptor CCR10.     

The crystal structure of D7r4, a salivary biogenic amine-binding protein from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae

The D7-related (D7r) proteins of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae have been shown to bind the biogenic amines serotonin, norepinephrine, and histamine with high affinity. One member of the group (D7r1 or hamadarin) has also been shown to have an anticoagulant/antikinin activity. To understand the mechanistic details of its antihemostatic/anti-inflammatory effects, we have determined the crystal structure of one member of this group, D7r4, along with the structures of ligand complexes with serotonin, tryptamine, histamine, and norepinephrine. The D7 fold consists of an arrangement of eight alpha-helices stabilized by three disulfide bonds. The structure is similar to those of the arthropod odorant-binding proteins, a relationship that had been predicted based on sequence comparisons. Although odorant-binding proteins commonly have six alpha-helices, D7r4 has eight, resulting in significantly different positioning and structure of the ligand binding pocket. The pocket itself is lined by hydrophobic side chains along with polar and charged groups oriented to form hydrogen bonds with the aliphatic amino group and with groups on the aromatic portions of the ligands. These structures, along with accompanying mutagenesis studies, have allowed us to identify critical residues for biogenic amine binding and to predict which members of the large D7 protein family found in blood-feeding nematocerous Diptera will function as biogenic amine-binding proteins.     

Chemokine receptor trio: CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 crosstalk via CXCL11 and CXCL12

Although chemokines are well established to function in immunity and endothelial cell activation and proliferation, a rapidly growing literature suggests that CXC Chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 are critical in the development and progression of solid tumors. The effect of these chemokine receptors in tumorigenesis is mediated via interactions with shared ligands I-TAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12). Over the last decade, CXCR4 has been extensively reported to be overexpressed in most human solid tumors and has earned considerable attention toward elucidating its role in cancer metastasis. To enrich the existing armamentarium of anti-cancerous agents, many inhibitors of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis have emerged as additional or alternative agents for neo-adjuvant treatments and even many of them are in preclinical and clinical stages of their development. However, the discovery of CXCR7 as another receptor for CXCL12 with rather high binding affinity and recent reports about its involvement in cancer progression, has questioned the potential of “selective blockade” of CXCR4 as cancer chemotherapeutics. Interestingly, CXCR7 can also bind another chemokine CXCL11, which is an established ligand for CXCR3. Recent reports have documented that CXCR3 and their ligands are overexpressed in different solid tumors and regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, it is important to consider the interactions and crosstalk between these three chemokine receptors and their ligand mediated signaling cascades for the development of effective anti-cancer therapies. Emerging evidence also indicates that these receptors are differentially expressed in tumor endothelial cells as well as in cancer stem cells, suggesting their direct role in regulating tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this review, we will focus on the signals mediated by this receptor trio via their shared ligands and their role in tumor growth and progression.     

Identification of amino acid residues of rat angiotensin II receptor for ligand binding by site directed mutagenesis.

To determine the specific mechanism of ligand binding to angiotensin (Ang II) receptor AT1, mutagenized rat receptor cDNAs were expressed transiently in COS-7 cells and the effect of the mutations on the binding to peptidic and non-peptidic ligands was analyzed by Scatchard plots. Mutation of Lys199 to Gln in the intramembrane domain strongly reduced the affinity to both [125I] Ang II and [125I]-1Sar, 8Ile-Ang II whereas mutation of two other Lys had little effect, indicating involvement of Lys199 in binding ligands. Replacement of each of four Cys in the extracellular domain markedly reduced binding affinity, indicating the importance of two putative disulfide bridges in the formation of active receptor conformation. Substitution of Asp for Asn in N-glycosylation had no effect on ligand binding or expression of the receptor. These studies indicate mutated receptors are expressed in the plasma membrane and are amenable for further detailed studies.     

Interleukin 8, neutrophil-activating peptide-2 and GRO-alpha bind to and elicit cell activation via specific and different amino acid residues of CXCR2

The objective of this investigation was to determine the amino acid residues of the human neutrophil CXC chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) that are critical for binding the ligands interleukin 8 (IL-8), neutrophil-activating peptide-2 (NAP-2), and growth-related protein alpha (GROalpha) and critical for receptor-mediated signal transduction. Charged residues of the amino terminus and the first extracellular loop of CXCR2 were targeted for point mutagenesis studies. Seven separate CXCR2 mutants (Glu7, Asp9, Glu12, Asp13, Lys108, Asn110, and Lys120, all to Ala) were generated. Based on the Scatchard analysis of radioligand binding studies, the following amino acids were deemed critical for ligand binding: (i) Asp9, Glu12, Lys108, and Lys120 for IL-8 and (ii) Glu7, Asp9, and Glu12 for GROalpha. Point mutations in the amino terminus domain (Asp9 and Glu12) and the first extracellular loop (Lys108, Asn110, and Lys120) of CXCR2 reduced cell activation to all three ligands as measured by changes in intracellular calcium concentration. In conclusion, high-affinity binding of IL-8, NAP-2, and GROalpha to CXCR2 involves interaction with specific and different amino acid residues of CXCR2. Furthermore, we propose that the CXCR2 amino acid residues required for cell activation are not necessarily the same residues required for ligand binding.     

Static and dynamic roles of extracellular loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: a mechanism for sequential binding of thyrotropin-releasing hormone to its receptor.

Small ligands generally bind within the seven transmembrane-spanning helices of G-protein-coupled receptors, but their access to the binding pocket through the closely packed loops has not been elucidated. In this work, a model of the extracellular loops of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor (TRHR) was constructed, and molecular dynamics simulations and quasi-harmonic analysis have been performed to study the static and dynamic roles of the extracellular domain. The static analysis based on curvature and electrostatic potential on the surface of TRHR suggests the formation of an initial recognition site between TRH and the surface of its receptor. These results are supported by experimental evidence. A quasi-harmonic analysis of the vibrations of the extracellular loops suggest that the low-frequency motions of the loops will aid the ligand to access its transmembrane binding pocket. We suggest that all small ligands may bind sequentially to the transmembrane pocket by first interacting with the surface binding site and then may be guided into the transmembrane binding pocket by fluctuations in the extracellular loops.     

The unique ligand-binding pocket for the human prostacyclin receptor. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling

The human prostacyclin receptor is a seven-transmembrane alpha-helical G-protein coupled receptor, which plays important roles in both vascular smooth muscle relaxation as well as prevention of blood coagulation. The position of the native ligand-binding pocket for prostacyclin as well as other derivatives of the 20-carbon eicosanoid, arachidonic acid, has yet to be determined. Through the use of prostanoid receptor sequence alignments, site-directed mutagenesis, and the 2.8-A x-ray crystallographic structure of bovine rhodopsin, we have developed a three-dimensional model of the agonist-binding pocket within the seven-transmembrane (TM) domains of the human prostacyclin receptor. Upon mutation to alanine, 11 of 29 candidate residues within TM domains II, III, IV, V, and VII exhibited a marked decrease in agonist binding. Of this group, four amino acids, Arg-279 (TMVII), Phe-278 (TMVII), Tyr-75 (TMII), and Phe-95 (TMIII), were identified (via receptor amino acid sequence alignment, ligand structural comparison, and computer-assisted homology modeling) as having direct molecular interactions with ligand side-chain constituents. This binding pocket is distinct from that of the biogenic amine receptors and rhodopsin where the native ligands (also composed of a carbon ring and a carbon chain) are accommodated in an opposing direction. These findings should assist in the development of novel and highly specific ligands including selective antagonists for further molecular pharmacogenetic studies of the human prostacyclin receptor.     

An activation switch in the ligand binding pocket of the C5a receptor

Although agonists are thought to occupy binding pockets within the seven-helix core of serpentine receptors, the topography of these binding pockets and the conformational changes responsible for receptor activation are poorly understood. To identify the ligand binding pocket in the receptor for complement factor 5a (C5aR), we assessed binding affinities of hexapeptide ligands, each mutated at a single position, for seven mutant C5aRs, each mutated at a single position in the putative ligand binding site. In ChaW (an antagonist) and W5Cha (an agonist), the side chains at position 5 are tryptophan and cyclohexylalanine, respectively. Comparisons of binding affinities indicated that the hexapeptide residue at this position interacts with two C5aR residues, Ile-116 (helix III) and Val-286 (helix VII); in a C5aR model these two side chains point toward one another. Both the I116A and the V286A mutations markedly increased binding affinity of W5Cha but not that of ChaW. Moreover, ChaW, the antagonist hexapeptide, acted as a full agonist on the I116A mutant. These results argue that C5aR residues Ile-116 and Val-286 interact with the side chain at position 5 of the hexapeptide ligand to form an activation switch. Based on this and previous work, we present a docking model for the hexapeptide within the C5aR binding pocket. We propose that agonists induce a small change in the relative orientations of helices III and VII and that these helices work together to allow movement of helix VI away from the receptor core, thereby triggering G protein activation.     

Mutational analysis of the binding site residues of the bovine cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor

Mannose 6-phosphate receptors (MPRs) deliver soluble acid hydrolases to the lysosome in higher eukaryotic cells. The two MPRs, the cation-dependent MPR (CD-MPR) and the insulin-like growth factor II/cation-independent MPR, carry out this process by binding with high affinity to mannose 6-phosphate residues found on the N-linked oligosaccharides of their ligands. To elucidate the key amino acids involved in conveying this carbohydrate specificity, site-directed mutagenesis studies were conducted on the extracytoplasmic domain of the bovine CD-MPR. Single amino acid substitutions of the residues that form the binding pocket were generated, and the mutant constructs were expressed in transiently transfected COS-1 cells. Following metabolic labeling, mutant CD-MPRs were tested for their ability to bind pentamannosyl phosphate-containing affinity columns. Of the eight amino acids mutated, four (Gln-66, Arg-111, Glu-133, and Tyr-143) were found to be essential for ligand binding. In addition, mutation of the single histidine residue, His-105, within the binding site diminished the binding of the receptor to ligand, but did not eliminate the ability of the CD-MPR to release ligand under acidic conditions.     

Plasticity of the ligand binding pocket in the bitter taste receptor T2R7

Bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are a group of 25 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in humans. The cognate agonists and the mechanism of ligand binding to the majority of the T2Rs remain unknown. Here we report the first structure-function analysis of T2R7 and study the ability of this receptor to bind to different agonists by site-directed mutagenesis. Screening of ligands for T2R7 in calcium based assays lead to the identification of novel compounds that activate this receptor. Quinine, diphenidol, dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine showed substantial activation of T2R7. Interestingly, these bitter compounds showed different pharmacological characteristics. To investigate the structural features in T2R7 that might contribute to the observed differences in agonist specificities, molecular model guided ligand docking and site-directed mutagenesis was pursued. Amino acids D65, D86, W89, N167, T169, W170, S181, T255 and E271 in the ligand-binding pocket were replaced and the mutants characterized pharmacologically. Our results suggest D86, S181 and W170 present on the extracellular side of transmembrane 3 (TM3), TM5 and in extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) are essential for agonist binding in T2R7. Mutations of these amino acids lead to loss-of-function. We also identified gain-of-function residues that are agonist specific. These results suggest that agonists bind at an extracellular site rather than deep within the TM core involving residues present in both ECL2 and TM helices in T2R7. Similar to majority of the Class A GPCRs, ECL2 in T2R7 plays a significant role in agonist binding and activation.     

A response calculus for immobilized T cell receptor ligands

To address the molecular mechanism of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, we have formulated a model for T cell activation, termed the 2D-affinity model, in which the density of TCR on the T cell surface, the density of ligand on the presenting surface, and their corresponding two-dimensional affinity determine the level of T cell activation. When fitted to T cell responses against purified ligands immobilized on plastic surfaces, the 2D-affinity model adequately simulated changes in cellular activation as a result of varying ligand affinity and ligand density. These observations further demonstrated the importance of receptor cross-linking density in determining TCR signaling. Moreover, it was found that the functional two-dimensional affinity of TCR ligands was affected by the chemical composition of the ligand-presenting surface. This makes it possible that cell-bound TCR ligands, despite their low affinity in solution, are of optimal two-dimensional affinity thereby allowing effective TCR binding under physiological conditions, i.e. at low ligand densities in cellular interfaces.     

Switching agonist/antagonist properties of opiate alkaloids at the delta opioid receptor using mutations based on the structure of the orphanin FQ receptor

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated that by mutating five amino acid residues to those conserved in the opioid receptors, the OFQ receptor could be converted to a functional receptor that bound many opioid alkaloids with nanomolar affinities. Surprisingly, when the reciprocal mutations, Lys-214 --> Ala (TM5), Ile-277 --> Val/His-278 --> Gln/Ile-279 --> Val (TM6), and Ile-304 --> Thr (TM7), are introduced in the delta receptor, neither the individual mutations nor their various combinations significantly reduce the binding affinities of opioid alkaloids tested. However, these mutations cause profound alterations in the functional characteristics of the mutant receptors as measured in guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assays. Some agonists become antagonists at some constructs as they lose their ability to activate them. Some alkaloid antagonists are transformed into agonists at other constructs, but their agonistic effects can still be blocked by the peptide antagonist TIPP. Even the delta inverse agonist 7-benzylidenenaltrexone becomes an agonist at the mutant containing both the Ile-277 --> Val/His-278 --> Gln/Ile-279 --> Val and Ile-304 --> Thr mutations. Thus, although the mutated residues are thought to be part of the binding pocket, they are critically involved in the control of the delta receptor activation process. These findings shed light on some of the structural bases of ligand efficacy. They are also compatible with the hypothesis that a ligand may achieve high affinity binding in several different ways, each having different effects on receptor activation.     

Structural elements of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor conferring subtype selectivity for benzodiazepine site ligands

gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors comprise a subfamily of ligand-gated ion channels whose activity can be modulated by ligands acting at the benzodiazepine binding site on the receptor. The benzodiazepine binding site was characterized using a site-directed mutagenesis strategy in which amino acids of the alpha5 subunit were substituted by their corresponding alpha1 residues. Given the high affinity and selectivity of alpha1-containing compared with alpha5-containing GABAA receptors for zolpidem, mutated alpha5 subunits were co-expressed with beta2 and gamma2 subunits, and the affinity of recombinant receptors for zolpidem was measured. One alpha5 mutant (bearing P162T, E200G, and T204S) exhibited properties similar to that of the alpha1 subunit, notably high affinity zolpidem binding and potentiation by zolpidem of GABA-induced chloride current. Two of these mutations, alpha5P162T and alpha5E200G, might alter binding pocket conformation, whereas alpha5T204S probably permits formation of a hydrogen bond with a proton acceptor in zolpidem. These three amino acid substitutions also influenced receptor affinity for CL218872. Our data thus suggest that corresponding amino acids of the alpha1 subunit, particularly alpha1-Ser204, are the crucial residues influencing ligand selectivity at the binding pocket of alpha1-containing receptors, and a model of this binding pocket is presented.     

Homology model of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor: sites critical for nonclassical cannabinoid agonist interaction

Association of cannabimimetic compounds such as cannabinoids, aminoalkylindoles (AAIs), and arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide) with the brain cannabinoid (CB(1)) receptor activates G-proteins and relays signals to regulate neuronal functions. A CB(1) receptor homology model was constructed using the published x-ray crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., Science, 2000, Vol. 289, pp. 739-745) in the conformation most likely to represent the "high-affinity" state for agonist binding to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A molecular docking approach that combined Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations was used to identify the putative binding conformations of nonclassical cannabinoid agonists, including AC-bicyclic CP47497 and CP55940, and ACD-tricyclic CP55244. Placement of these ligands was based upon the assumption of a critical hydrogen bond between the A-ring OH and the side chain N of Lys192 in transmembrane helix 3. We evaluated two alternative binding conformations, C3-in and C3-out, denoting the directionality of the ligand C3 side chain within the receptor with respect to the inside or the outside of the cell. Assuming both the C3-in or C3-out conformation, the calculated ligand-receptor binding energy (DeltaE(bind)) was correlated with the experimentally observed binding affinity (K(i)) for a series of nonclassical cannabinoid agonists. The C3-in conformation was marginally better than the alternative C3-out conformation in predicting the rank order of the tested nonclassical cannabinoid analogs. Adopting the C3-in conformation due to the greater number of receptor interactions with known pharmacophoric elements of the ligand, key residues were identified comprising the presumed hydrophobic pocket that interacts with the C3 side chain of cannabinoid agonists. Key hydrogen bonds would form between both K3.28(192) and E(258) and the A-ring OH, and between Q(261) and the C-ring C-12 hydroxypropyl. In summary, the present study represents one of the first attempts to construct a homology model of the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor based upon the published bovine rhodopsin x-ray crystal structure and to elucidate the putative ligand binding site for nonclassical cannabinoid agonists. We postulated sites of the CB(1) receptor critical for the ligand interaction, including the hydrophobic pocket interacting with the key pharmacophoric moiety, the C3 side chain. More work is needed to delineate between two alternative (and possibly other) binding conformations of the nonclassical cannabinoid ligands within the CB(1) receptor. The present study provides a consistent framework for further investigation of the CB(1) receptor-ligand interaction and for the study of CB(1) receptor activation.     

Twists and turns of the cation-dependent mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Ligand-bound versus ligand-free receptor.

Mannose 6-phosphate receptors (MPRs) participate in the biogenesis of lysosomes in higher eukaryotes by transporting soluble acid hydrolases from the trans-Golgi network to late endosomal compartments. The receptors release their ligands into the acidic environment of the late endosome and then return to the trans-Golgi network to repeat the process. However, the mechanism that facilitates ligand binding and dissociation upon changes in pH is not known. We report the crystal structure of the extracytoplasmic domain of the homodimeric cation-dependent MPR in a ligand-free form at pH 6.5. A comparison of the ligand-bound and ligand-free structures reveals a significant change in quaternary structure as well as a reorganization of the binding pocket, with the most prominent change being the relocation of a loop (residues Glu(134)-Cys(141)). The movements involved in the bound-to-free transition of the cation-dependent MPR are reminiscent of those of the oxy-to-deoxy hemoglobin transition. These results allow us to propose a mechanism by which the receptor regulates its ligand binding upon changes in pH; the pK(a) of Glu(133) appears to be responsible for ligand release in the acidic environment of the late endosomal compartment, and the pK(a) values of the sugar phosphate and His(105) are accountable for its inability to bind ligand at the cell surface where the pH is about 7.4.     

The unique extracellular disulfide loop of the glycine receptor is a principal ligand binding element.

A loop structure, formed by the putative disulfide bridging of Cys198 and Cys209, is a principal element of the ligand binding site in the glycine receptor (GlyR). Disruption of the loop's tertiary structure by Ser mutations of these Cys residues either prevented receptor assembly on the cell surface, or created receptors unable to be activated by agonists or to bind the competitive antagonist, strychnine. Mutation of residues Lys200, Tyr202 and Thr204 within this loop reduced agonist binding and channel activation sensitivities by up to 55-, 520- and 190-fold, respectively, without altering maximal current sizes, and mutations of Lys200 and Tyr202 abolished strychnine binding to the receptor. Removal of the hydroxyl moiety from Tyr202 by mutation to Phe profoundly reduced agonist sensitivity, whilst removal of the benzene ring abolished strychnine binding, thus demonstrating that Tyr202 is crucial for both agonist and antagonist binding to the GlyR. Tyr202 also influences receptor assembly on the cell surface, with only large chain substitutions (Phe, Leu and Arg, but not Thr, Ser and Ala) forming functional receptors. Our data demonstrate the presence of a second ligand binding site in the GlyR, consistent with the three-loop model of ligand binding to the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily.     

Determinants of high-affinity binding and receptor activation in the N-terminus of CCL-19 (MIP-3 beta)

CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR-7) is expressed on mature dendritic cells and T-cells. Its ligands, CCL-19 (MIP-3beta) and CCL-21 (SLC), play an important role in the migration of these cells to secondary lymphoid organs where they are predominantly expressed. For most chemokines, the N-terminal domain preceding the first two conserved cysteines is involved in stabilizing the active conformation of its cognate receptors. We have chemically synthesized N-terminal analogues of CCL-19 with the aid of a native chemical ligation method to investigate structure function requirements of this ligand domain by performing ligand binding, GTP-gammaS binding, and chemotaxis assays. Successive truncations of the N-terminus of CCL-19 reduced the affinity of the receptor for the ligand in a size-dependent manner. Furthermore, Ala substitutions of Asn(3), Asp(4), and Asp(7) show that the side chains of these residues are important for high-affinity binding of CCL-19 to CCR-7. The effects observed were mirrored in both GTP-gammaS binding and chemotaxis assays, highlighting the functional importance of this ligand domain. We also describe two partial agonists of CCR-7 ([Nle(72)]CCL-19(6-77) and Ac-[Nle(72)]CCL-19(7-77)), and identify the first analogue of CCL-19 (Ac-[Nle(72)]CCL-19(8-77)) that acts as a functional antagonist in vitro (K(B) approximately 350 nM for GTP-gammaS binding assays). As mutations of both Glu(6) and Asp(7) to Ala did not dissociate effects on ligand binding from receptor activation, it is likely that the backbone of these two residues is crucial for agonist activity.