Polar auxin transport controls suspensor fate

Polar auxin transport is critical for normal embryo development in angiosperms. It has been proposed that auxin accumulates dynamically at specific positions, which in early Arabidopsis embryos correlates with developmental decisions such as specification of the apical cell lineage, specification of the hypophysis, and differentiation of the two cotyledons. In conifers, pattern formation during embryo development is different, and includes a free nuclear stage, nondividing suspensor cells, presence of tube cells, lack of hypophysis and formation of a crown of cotyledons surrounding the shoot apical meristem. We have recently shown that polar auxin transport is important for normal embryo development also in conifers. Here we suggest a model where auxin is transported from the suspensor cells to the embryonal mass during early embryogeny in conifers. This transport is essential for the developmental decisions of the tube cells and the suspensor, and affects both the amount of programmed cell death and the embryo patterning.Key words: conifer, embryo development, 1-N-naphtylphthalamic acid (NPA), patterning, polar auxin transport, programmed cell death, somatic embryogenesis, suspensorIn the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana auxin is transported, already from the first cell division of the zygote, from the basal cell to the apical cell, where it is involved in establishing the identity of the apical cell lineage. At the 32-cell stage the polar auxin transport is reversed, leading to an auxin accumulation in the uppermost suspensor cell, which occurs concomitantly with the specification of the hypophysis. During the heart stage auxin is transported towards the cotyledonary primordia, giving positional information about the cotyledon outgrowth.¹ Formation of the apical-basal embryonic pattern during early embryogeny in conifers is quite different from that in Arabidopsis and proceeds through the establishment of three major cell types: the meristematic cells of the embryonal mass, the embryonal tube cells and terminally differentiated nondividing suspensor cells.²The somatic embryo system of Picea abies (Norway spruce) includes a stereotyped sequence of developmental stages, resembling zygotic embryogeny, which can be synchronized by specific treatments.^3,4 We are using this as a model system for elucidating the regulation of embryo development in conifers.² Early somatic embryos differentiate from proembryonic masses (PEMs) after withdrawal of the plant growth regulators (PGRs) auxin and cytokinin (Fig. 1A and B). We have previously shown that the organisation of the apical-basal polarity in early embryos is dependent on a gradient of PCD from the embryonal tube cells committed to death, to the cell corpses at the basal end of the suspensor.^5–7 Dysregulation of the PCD leads to aberrant apical-basal patterning.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Model for polar auxin transport control of early embryo patterning in conifers. (A) Embryogenic cultures proliferate as proembryonic masses (PEMs) in the presence of the plant growth regulators (PGRs) auxin and cytokinin. (B) Early embryos start to differentiate from PEMs after withdrawal of PGRs. Endogenous auxin is transported to the newly formed embryonal mass. (C) Early embryos are formed within two weeks in PGR-free medium. Early embryos have a distinct embryonal mass, tube cells and a suspensor. IAA is transported from the suspensor and the tube cells to the embryonal mass. (D) Fully matured cotyledonary embryos are formed after 5–6 weeks on maturation medium. (E) Treatment with NPA blocks the polar auxin transport to the embryonal mass, leading to an IAA accumulation in the suspensor cells, tube cells and perhaps also in the cells of the embryonal mass most adjacent to the tube cells. (F) Embryos with supernumerary suspensor cells are formed if polar auxin transport is inhibited only during the earliest stages of suspensor differentiation. (G) Embryos with meristematic cells in the suspensor are formed if polar auxin transport is inhibited during both differentiation and elongation of the suspensor. We assume that these abnormalities abort further development and maturation of viable embryos. em, embryonal mass; s, suspensor; tc, tube cells. Green arrows indicate polar auxin transport, T indicates blocked polar auxin transport, green shadings indicate auxin accumulation.We recently showed that in embryogenic cultures of Norway spruce treated with the polar auxin transport inhibitor NPA, the number of cells undergoing PCD decreases. As a consequence the balance between the number of cells in the embryonal mass and the number of cells in the suspensor develop abnormally, and concomitantly the endogenous free IAA content increases almost two-fold.⁸In order to visualise the IAA accumulation within the embryos we used a -318 bp deletion of the auxin-responsive IAA4/5 promoter from Pisum sativum (pea), previously characterized by Oeller et al.,⁹ and Ballas et al.,¹⁰ fused to the GUS reporter gene.¹¹ In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) the promoter is expressed in rapidly elongating hypocotyls,¹² (our unpublished observations) and strong induction by auxin is clear in elongating zones of both roots and hypocotyls in transgenic pIAA4/5-GUS Arabidopsis plants.¹¹ However, to our knowledge, expression of IAA4/5 has not been reported in embryonal shoot apical meristems. Hence, the pIAA4/5-GUS may preferentially be used as a biosensor of auxin activity in non-meristematic cells during spruce embryo development. During normal somatic embryo development in spruce, pIAA4/5-GUS activity is detected in PEMs, tube cells and suspensor cells, but not in the embryonal mass. Early embryos of Norway spruce that are treated with NPA show increased pIAA4/5-GUS activity in tube cells and suspensor cells (unpublished), well in line with the increment of free IAA levels.Our results indicate that IAA under normal conditions is transported from the suspensor cells to the cells in the embryonal mass (Fig. 1B and C). NPA-treatment blocks this polar transport of endogenous IAA, which results in an accumulation of IAA and increased pIAA4/5-GUS activity in the suspensor cells, the tube cells, and perhaps also in the cells of the embryonal mass most adjacent to the tube cells (Fig. 1F and G). Blocked polar auxin transport during early differentiation of the suspensor stimulates abnormal cell divisions of the meristematic cells most adjacent to the tube cells or perhaps even of the tube cells themselves. Consequently, embryos with supernumerary tube and suspensor cells are formed (Fig. 1F). If the polar auxin transport is blocked for a longer time, i.e., during both differentiation and elongation of the suspensor, the auxin accumulation leads to maintenance of meristematic fate and a failure to undergo PCD (Fig. 1G).It has been proposed that the fate of the suspensor cells is regulated by signals from the embryo proper which impede developmental potential and initiate PCD.¹³ In accordance, we assume that the abnormal embryo morphologies formed after NPA-treatment may result from adverse inhibitory signals from the embryonal mass.     

The Arabidopsis MAP kinase kinase 7: A crosstalk point between auxin signaling and defense responses?

Plant-pathogen interaction induces a complex host response that coordinates various signaling pathways through multiple signal molecules. Besides the well-documented signal molecules salicylic acid (SA), ethylene and jasmonic acid, auxin is emerging as an important player in this response. We recently characterized an Arabidopsis activation-tagged mutant, bud1, in which the expression of the MAP kinase kinase 7 (AtMKK7) gene is increased. The bud1 mutant plants accumulate elevated levels of SA and display constitutive pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression and enhanced resistance to pathogens. Additionally, increased expression of AtMKK7 in the bud1 mutant causes deficiency in polar auxin transport, indicating that AtMKK7 negatively regulates auxin signaling. Based on these results, we hypothesized that AtMKK7 may serve as a crosstalk point between auxin signaling and defense responses. Here we show that increased expression of AtMKK7 in bud1 results in a significant reduction in free auxin (indole-3-acetic acid) levels in the mutant plants. We propose three possible mechanisms to explain how AtMKK7 coordinates the growth hormone auxin and the defense signal molecule SA in the bud1 mutant plants. We suggest that AtMKK7 may play a role in cell death and propose that AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 may function downstream of AtMKK7.Key words: Arabidopsis, MAP kinase kinase 7, auxin signaling, defense responses, crosstalkPathogen invasion of a plant induces multiple physiological changes at the site of infection, including the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and salicylic acid (SA).^1–6 Jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) are also produced in response to pathogen infection.^7–11 Numerous reports have documented that SA, JA and ET work synergistically or antagonistically to fine-tune plant defense responses, based on a multitude of environmental, host and pathogen genetic factors that vary depending on the pathogen-host combinations.^4,12The growth hormone auxin may also play an important role in plant defense responses. Many plant-pathogenic microorganisms have the ability to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA),¹³ which is important for the pathogenicity for some pathogens.^14–16 In the Arabidopsis-Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) compatible interaction, Xcc triggers IAA synthesis in the host plants.17 Exogenous treatment of plants with the auxin analogs, NAA and 2,4-D, leads to disease susceptibility.¹⁸ A flagellin-derived-peptid e-induced microRNA (miRNA) was found to negatively regulate messenger RNAs for the F-box auxin receptors TIR1, AFB2 and AFB3, to repress auxin signaling, resulting in significantly enhanced host resistance.¹⁸ These results suggest that auxin likely functions as a virulence factor to suppress host defense.We previously identified an Arabidopsis activation-tagged mutant bud1 from a transgenic population generated by a sense/antisense RNA expression system.¹⁹ Further characterization indicated that bud1 is a semidominant mutant, in which the expression of the Arabidopsis MAP kinase kinase 7 (AtMKK7) gene is increased.²⁰ The increased expression of AtMKK7 in bud1 causes deficiency in auxin transport, whereas reducing mRNA levels of AtMKK7 by antisense RNA expression leads to enhancement of auxin transport, indicating that AtMKK7 negatively regulates polar auxin transport (PAT).²⁰ Recently, we have shown that the bud1 mutant plants accumulate elevated levels of SA and exhibit constitutive pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression and enhanced resistance to both the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Psm) ES4326 and the oomycete pathogen Hyaloperonospora parasitica Noco2.²¹ Reducing mRNA levels of AtMKK7 by antisense RNA expression not only compromises basal resistance but also blocks the induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), demonstrating that AtMKK7 is a positive regulator required for both basal resistance and SAR.²¹ Furthermore, we found that the free IAA levels in the bud1 mutant plants were significantly reduced, compared to those in wild-type plants (Fig. 1A). All these results taken together suggest that AtMKK7 may positively regulate SA signaling and negatively regulate auxin signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) Free IAA levels in wild type (WT) and bud1 mutant plants. Thirty-day-old soil grown plants were used for free IAA measurement. (B) A schematic representation of three possible mechanisms through which MKK7 regulates host responses after pathogen invasion.Given that SA is a positive regulator of defense responses, whereas auxin is likely a negative regulator of defense responses, we propose three possible mechanisms through which AtMKK7 coordinates the growth hormone auxin and the defense signal molecule SA in the bud1 mutant plants (Fig. 1B): (1) AtMKK7 induces SA accumulation, which suppresses auxin signaling, leading to increased defense responses; (2) AtMKK7 independently induces SA accumulation and suppresses auxin signaling; (3) AtMKK7 suppresses auxin signaling, which relieves the repression of SA signaling by auxin, resulting in SA accumulation.We could test the hypotheses using different approaches. We can examine whether the expression of YUC1, YUC2, YUC4 and YUC6, genes that have been suggested to play essential roles in auxin biosynthesis,²² is altered in the bud1 mutant. We can also analyze the expression of YUC1, YUC2, YUC4 and YUC6, as well as the levels of free IAA in the double mutant bud1sid2 (sid2 is a SA deficient mutant) to test whether IAA biosynthesis is derepressed in the double mutant. Furthermore, polar auxin transport in the bud1sid2 plants should be determined. Finally, we can test whether exogenous application of auxin is able to suppress AtMKK7-induced constitutive defense responses in the bud1 mutant, including elevated levels of SA, constitutive PR gene expression and enhanced resistance to Psm ES4326 and H. parasitica Noco2.AtMKK7 belongs to the Group D of plant MAPKKs.²³ Functions of two other members of this group, LeMKK4 and NbMKK1, have been described.^24,25 LeMKK4 and NbMKK1 are orthologs of AtMKK7 in tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana, respectively. When overexpressed in leaves, wild-type LeMKK4 elicits cell death in both tomato and N. benthamiana.²⁴ Overexpression of wild-type NbMKK1 also causes cell death on N. benthamiana leaves.²⁵ We expected that overexpression of AtMKK7 would also result in cell death. However, neither increased expression of AtMKK7 in the bud1 mutant plants, nor overexpression of wild-type AtMKK7 from the dexamethasone-inducible promoter causes cell death.²¹ This is probably because the expression levels of AtMKK7 in these plants were below the threshold to induce cell death. Consistently, ectopic and constitutive expression of AtMKK7 driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in wild-type plants leads to lethality of the transgenic plants.²⁰ Therefore, to characterize the function of AtMKK7 in cell death, transgenic plants expressing a constitutively active form of AtMKK7 (AtMKK7^S193A/S199D) from the dexamethasone-inducible promoter will be useful.What MAPK(s) acts downstream of AtMKK7? LeMKK4 directly phosphorylates LeMPK1, LeMPK2 and LeMPK3 in vitro, and activates LeMPK2 and LeMPK3 when expressed in tomato leaves,²⁴ whereas NbMKK1 activates NbSIPK when expressed in N. benthamiana leaves.²⁵ LeMPK2 and LeMPK3 are tomato orthologs of the well-studied tobacco proteins SIPK (salicylic acid-induced protein kinase) and WIPK (wound-induced protein kinase),^26,27 respectively. The Arabidopsis orthologs of SIPK and WIPK are AtMPK6 and AtMPK3, respectively. Based on previous in-gel kinase assay results,²¹ we predict that both AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 may function downstream of AtMKK7. Characterization of double mutants bud1atmpk3 and bud1atmpk6, as well as atmpk3 and atmpk6 mutant plants expressing the constitutively active form of AtMKK7 from the dexamethasone-inducible promoter will shed light on this question.     

Thigmomorphogenesis in Solanum lycopersicum: Morphological and biochemical responses in stem after mechanical stimulation

The activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants by environmental stimuli is one of the most universal biochemical stress responses known. In tomato plant, rubbing applied to a young internode inhibit elongation of the rubbed internode and his neighboring one. These morphological changes were correlated with an increase in lignification enzyme activities, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidases (POD), 24 hours after rubbing of the forth internode. Furthermore, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content was detected in the rubbed internode and the upper one. Taken together, our results suggest that decrease in rubbed internode length is a consequence of IAA oxidation, increases in enzyme activities (PAL, CAD and POD), and cell wall rigidification associated with induction of lignification process.Key words: Mechanical stimulation, PAL, CAD, POD, IAAIn their environment, plants are constantly submitted to several stimuli such as wind, rain and wounding. The growth response of plants to such stimuli was termed thigmomorphogenesis and was observed in a wide range of plants.^1–3 The most common thigmomorphogenetic response is a retardation of tissue elongation accompanied by an increase in thickness.⁴ The plant response to mechanical perturbation is mainly restricted to the young developing internode, since no influence can be detected when the internode has reached its final length.^5,6 These plant growth modifications, which characterize thigmomorphogenesis, are related to biochemical events associated with lignification process⁷ and ethylene production.^8,9In tomato plant the length of internodes 4 (N4) and 5 (N5) was measured 14 days after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in Figure 1 show that rubbing led to a significant reduction of elongation of the stressed internode (N4) (decrease of N4 length from 4.3 cm in the control plant to 2.9 in the rubbed one). This effect was not limited to the rubbed area but affected also the elongation of the neighboring internodes (N5) that were shorter in rubbed plants than in control ones.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Internode lengths of control and rubbed plants measured 14 day after mechanical stress applied to the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Results reported in Figure 2 show an increase in PAL activity in both internodes N4 and N5, 24 hours after mechanical stress application as compared with corresponding controls. CAD activity was also investigated in N4 and N5, 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results presented in Figure 3 show that mechanical stress application induces a strong increase of CAD activity in the rubbed internode N4 (5.3 nkatal μg-1 protein) with an approximately two-fold increase when compared to control tomato internodes (2.3 nkatal μg-1 protein). Further, CAD activity in N5 was also increased in the rubbed internode (5.538 nkatal μg-1 protein) as compared with the control one (3.256 nkatal μg-1 protein).Open in a separate windowFigure 2PAL activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Open in a separate windowFigure 3CAD activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Syringaldazine (S-POD) and gaïacol (G-POD) peroxidase activities were measured in tomato N4 and N5. Results reported in Figure 4 show an increase in soluble peroxidase activity with both substrates in the rubbed internode N4 as compared with control plant. Enhancement in peroxidase activities in N4 was more pronounced with gaïacol (80.7 U) as an electron donor than syringaldazine (33.8 U). Similar results were observed in internode 5 as compared with control one (Fig. 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4(A) Syringaldazine-POD (Syr-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars. (B) Gaiacol-POD (G-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.IAA was quantified in control and rubbed plant internodes 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in figure 5 show that in control sample and as expected, the content of IAA was found to be higher in the younger internode (N5) as compared to the older one (N4). Rubbing led to a significant decrease in IAA levels in N4 (5.06 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹) as compared with corresponding controls (7.27 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹). Similar results were observed in internode 5, where IAA content was reduced from 16.52 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in control internode to 12.35 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in the rubbed internode (Fig. 5).Open in a separate windowFigure 5IAA Level of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.The results reported here establish an evident correlation between growth limitation of the rubbed internode and their degree of lignification, the increase in lignification enzymes activities and auxin degradation after mechanical stress application.Auxin seems to be involved in thigmomorphogenesis.¹⁰ It was proposed that MIS (Mechanically-induced stress) has opposite effects on auxin levels in the two species studied to date, Phaseolus vulgaris¹⁰ and Bryonia dioica.^11,12 Auxin level as measured by bioassay, increased in Phaseolus vulgaris following rubbing of the stem.¹⁰ It was proposed that a build up of auxin may result from the reduced polar transport of IAA at the rubbed internode, causing a build up of IAA in the stem tissue. Exogenous IAA did not reverse the MIS inhibition of growth in Phaseolus vulgaris and high levels of IAA retarded growth in non-stressed plants.¹⁰ Thus, retardation of extension growth in Phaseolus vulgaris may have been caused by high levels of endogenous auxin and the increase in stem diameter by increased ethylene production.⁴ However, ethylene increases radial growth only if auxin is present.¹³Boyer¹¹ reported a decrease in auxinlike activity in Bryonia dioica following MIS and this was confirmed in the same species by Hofinger et al.¹² who reported a decrease in IAA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Auxin catabolism was accompanied with changes in both soluble and ionically bound cell wall basic peroxidases¹⁴ and the appearance of an additional peroxidase. This can suggest that in Bryonia, auxin catabolism is hastened by mechanical stimulated peroxidase. In addition, Boyer et al.¹⁵ reported that lithium pre-treatment prevents both thigmomorphogenesis and appearance of specific cathodic isoperoxidase in Bryonia plants subjected to MIS. This is give further credence to the possibility that the peroxidase-auxin system is involved in Bryonia thigmomorphogenesis. In addition, ethylene increases peroxidase activity which reduces the auxin content in the tissue to a level low enough not to support normal growth. We have evidence that decrease of auxin level contribute to mechanism leading to tomato internode inhibition subjected to mechanical stress.Growth inhibition has been suggested to be the result of tissues lignification.⁶ As the initial enzyme in the monolignol biosynthesis pathway, PAL has a direct influence on lignin accumulation.¹⁶ The characteristics of lignin differ among cell wall tissues and plant organs.¹⁷ It comprises polyphenolic polymers derived from the oxidative polymerization of different monolignols, including p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols via a side pathway of phenylalanine metabolism leading to lignin synthesis.¹⁸ The increase in lignin content in the rubbed tomato internode could be a response mechanism to mechanical damage caused by rubbing.³ It is known that plants create a natural barrier that includes lignin and suberin synthesis, components directly linked to support systems.^19,20The increase in lignin content of rubbed tomato internode³ is paralleled by a rise in CAD activity and whilst such direct proportionality between CAD activity and lignin accumulation does not always agree with the results in the literature, it clearly is responding in ways similar to those of the other enzymes in the pathway.²¹Mechanical stress-induced membrane depolarization would generate different species of free radicals and peroxides, which in turn initiate lipid peroxidation.²² The degradation of cell membranes is suggested to bring about rapid changes in ionic flux, especially release of K⁺ which would result in an enhanced endogenous Ca/K ratio and in leakage of solutes, among them electron donors such as ascorbic acid and phenolic substances. The increased intracellular relative calcium level activated secretion of basic peroxidases²³ into the free space where, in association with the electron donors and may be with the circulating IAA, they eliminate the peroxides, and facilitated binding of basic peroxidases to membrane structures allowing a role as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-oxidases. The resulting IAA and ACC oxidase-mediated changes in ethylene production²⁴ would further induce (this time through the protein synthesis machinery) an increase in activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidases. The resulting lignification and cell wall rigidification determines the growth response of tomato internode to the mechanical stress.     

Linking protein kinase CK2 and auxin transport

Studies performed in different organisms have highlighted the importance of protein kinase CK2 in cell growth and cell viability. However, the plant signaling pathways in which CK2 is involved are largely unknown. We have reported that a dominant-negative mutant of CK2 in Arabidopsis thaliana shows phenotypic traits that are typically linked to alterations in auxin-dependent processes. We demonstrated that auxin transport is, indeed, impaired in these mutant plants, and that this correlates with misexpression and mislocalization of PIN efflux transporters and of PINOID. Our data establishes a link between CK2 activity and the regulation of auxin homeostasis in plants, strongly suggesting that CK2 might be required at multiple points of the pathways regulating auxin fluxes.Key words: protein kinase CK2, root development, auxin, PIN, PINOIDThe plant hormone auxin plays critical roles in plant growth and development.¹ The most abundant natural auxin is the indol-3-acetic acid (IAA), which is synthesized in young apical tissues and then transported to the growing zones of the stem and root. The major route for long distance IAA movement is via the vascular tissue, but, additionally, a slower transport via cell-to-cell (called polar transport) is critical to generate auxin gradients within tissues. Formation of correct auxin gradients is thought to be essential for many plant developmental processes.² In recent years, the IAA transporters have been identified, establishing the molecular basis to understand how auxin transport is regulated. In particular, the identification of the family of plasma-resident PIN proteins, the members of which function as IAA efflux carriers, and the knowledge of their polar localization in the plasma membrane (PM), contributed to generate models predicting the direction of IAA fluxes.^3,4The factors that govern PIN targeting to a particular membrane domain are still not understood. It is known that PIN proteins constitutively undergo cycles of exocytosis and endocytosis to and from the PM, using distinct sorting and recycling endosome trafficking pathways.^5–7 Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation by the Ser/Thr kinase PINOID (PID) and the protein phosphatase 2A, respectively, controls PIN proteins apical/basal localization at the PM, via the GNOM-mediated vesicle trafficking system.⁸ Interestingly, PID is a member of the plant AGC kinases, and, as it happens with its mammals AGC counterparts, is activated by a membrane-associated 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK1).⁹ Moreover, a functional similarity between PIN polar localization in response to auxin and glucose receptor (GLUT4) asymmetrical distribution in response to insulin, has been pointed out.¹⁰ In both cases, cargo proteins (GLUT4 and PIN, respectively) are transported from endosomal vesicles to PM and the process is mediated by PDK1-activated AGC kinases.Protein kinase CK2 is a Ser/Thr kinase evolutionary conserved in eukaryotes, which plays key roles in cell survival, cell division and other cellular processes. A loss-of-function mutant of CK2 in Arabidopsis, obtained by overexpression of a CK2α-inactive subunit, confirmed the essential role of this protein kinase for plant viability.¹¹ Moreover, CK2mut plants showed a dramatic decrease of lateral root formation, inhibition of root growth and overproliferation of root hairs. We have further demonstrated that auxin transport is impaired in this plants, which is concomitant with missexpression of most of the PM-resident PIN proteins, and of PID.¹² In addition, PIN proteins accumulated in endosomal vesicles and auxin gradients were disturbed, both in roots and shoots of CK2mut plants. In particular, root columella cells were depleted of auxin, although the maximum at the quiescent center was unchanged. Starch granule staining with lugol revealed that columella cells retained their fate, although their organization and/or cell shape were clearly affected (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Lugol-stained starch granules in uninduced (−Dex) and Dex-induced (+Dex) CK2mut roots. In the central part of the figure, a sketch of the main morphogenetic characteristics of mutant roots (right plantlet) as compared to wild-type roots (left plantlet) is shown. Note the shorter roots, wavy phenotype, absence of lateral roots and overproliferation of root hairs in mutant plants.Our results strongly suggest that CK2 is a regulator of auxin-dependent responses, most likely by participating in the regulation of auxin transport. Strikingly, depletion of CK2 activity inhibits some auxin-dependent physiological responses whereas it enhances others. For instance, whereas shoot phototropism was completely absent, root gravitropism was enhanced.¹² Figure 2 shows a time-course of DR5rev::GFP-derived signal after changing the gravity vector, in mutant and control Arabidopsis roots. The progressive auxin translocation to the lower side of the root after gravistimulation is more rapid and sustained in mutant than in control roots, which is likely responsible for the enhanced response to gravity found in mutant roots. Based on these results, we postulate that CK2 might act at different points of the auxin-induced regulatory pathway. As far as is known, the core module that regulates auxin transport is constituted by the protein kinase PID and a protein of the NPH3-domain family. NPH3-containing proteins play important roles in phototropic and gravitropic responses, and regulate polarity and endocytosis of PIN proteins.¹³ As has been proposed by other authors, the participation of one AGC kinase and one NPH3-like protein upstream of an ARF factor might be a common theme in response to different stimulus that are signaled by auxin.¹⁴ We propose that one of the functions of CK2 is the regulation of the activity of core proteins (Fig. 3). Mammalian AGC kinases are well known substrates of CK2 and CK2-dependent phosphorylation is critical for a full display of their activity. The PID and the NPH3-containing protein sequences contain numerous acidic-based motifs that are predicted CK2 phosphorylation sites. Moreover, according to Arabidopsis phosphoproteome databases, several members of the NPH3-containing protein family are predicted to be phosphorylated.¹⁵ In addition, we do not discard the possibility that other proteins involved in PIN transport might also be regulated by CK2-dependent phosphorylation. Experiments are in progress in our laboratory to assess the regulatory role of CK2 in auxin transport.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Time course of auxin relocation during root gravitropic response, as visualized by DR5rev::GFP fluorescence. Root pictures were taken at the indicated times after changing the direction of the gravity vector. Translocation of auxin to the lower part of the root is more rapid in Dex-induced CK2mut plants. Arrows indicate asymmetrical DR5::GFP fluorescence.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Proposed model for the role of CK2 in regulating auxin transport. The core module that regulates auxin transport (shown here as a black box) is constituted by the protein kinase PID and a protein of the NPH3-domain family. PID regulates apical-basal targeting of PIN proteins, by phosphorylating conserved Ser residues present in PIN hydrophilic loops.¹⁶ On the other hand, the family of NPH3-containing proteins regulates polarity and endocytosis of PIN proteins.¹³ There is also a functional similarity between the intracellular transport of PIN proteins and that of the glucose receptor (GLUT4),¹⁰ two processes that are signaled by AGC kinases. We propose that CK2 might be a regulator of the activity of the core proteins, by phosphorylating either the AGC kinase and/or the NPH3-containing protein. Mammalian CK2 is a known regulator of the activity of AGC kinases and other proteins participating in signaling pathways, such as in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.¹⁷     

Localized auxin biosynthesis and postembryonic root development in Arabidopsis

Auxin is a phytohormone essential for plant development. Due to the high redundancy in auxin biosynthesis, the role of auxin biosynthesis in embryogenesis and seedling development, vascular and flower development, shade avoidance and ethylene response were revealed only recently. We previously reported that a vitamin B₆ biosynthesis mutant pdx1 exhibits a short-root phenotype with reduced meristematic zone and short mature cells. By reciprocal grafting, we now have found that the pdx1 short root is caused by a root locally generated signal. The mutant root tips are defective in callus induction and have reduced DR5::GUS activity, but maintain relatively normal auxin response. Genetic analysis indicates that pdx1 mutant could suppress the root hair and root growth phenotypes of the auxin overproduction mutant yucca on medium supplemented with tryptophan (Trp), suggesting that the conversion from Trp to auxin is impaired in pdx1 roots. Here we present data showing that pdx1 mutant is more tolerant to 5-methyl anthranilate, an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate, demonstrating that pdx1 is also defective in the conversion from anthranilate to auxin precursor tryptophan. Our data suggest that locally synthesized auxin may play an important role in the postembryonic root growth.Key words: auxin synthesis, root, PLP, PDX1The plant hormone auxin modulates many aspects of growth and development including cell division and cell expansion, leaf initiation, root development, embryo and fruit development, pattern formation, tropism, apical dominance and vascular tissue differentiation.^1–3 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is the major naturally occurring auxin. IAA can be synthesized in cotyledons, leaves and roots, with young developing leaves having the highest capacity.^4,5Auxin most often acts in tissues or cells remote from its synthetic sites, and thus depends on non-polar phloem transport as well as a highly regulated intercellular polar transport system for its distribution.²The importance of local auxin biosynthesis in plant growth and development has been masked by observations that impaired long-distance auxin transport can result in severe growth or developmental defects.^3,6 Furthermore, a few mutants with reduced free IAA contents display phenotypes similar to those caused by impaired long-distance auxin transport. These phenotypes include defective vascular tissues and flower development, short primary roots and reduced apical dominance, or impaired shade avoidance and ethylene response.^7–15 Since these phenotypes most often could not be rescued by exogenous auxin application, it is difficult to attribute such defects to altered local auxin biosynthesis. By complementing double, triple or quadruple mutants of four Arabidopsis shoot-abundant auxin biosynthesis YUCCA genes with specific YUCCA promoters driven bacterial auxin biosynthesis iaaM gene, Cheng et al. provided unambiguous evidence that auxin biosynthesis is indispensable for embryo, flower and vascular tissue development.^8,13 Importantly, it is clear that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs is not functionally interchangeable among different organs, supporting the notion that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs mainly functions locally or in a short range.^6,8,13The central role of auxin in root meristem patterning and maintenance is well documented,^1,2,16 but the source of such IAA is still unclear. When ¹⁴C-labeled IAA was applied to the five-day-old pea apical bud, the radioactivity could be detected in lateral root primordia but not the apical region of primary roots.¹⁷ Moreover, removal of the shoot only slightly affected elongation of the primary root, and localized application of auxin polar transport inhibitor naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) at the primary root tip exerted more profound inhibitory effect on root elongation than at any other site.¹⁸ These results suggest that auxin generated near the root tip may play a more important role in primary root growth than that transported from the shoot. In line with this notion, Arabidopsis roots have been shown to harbor multiple auxin biosynthesis sites including root tips and the region upward from the tip.⁴Many steps of tryptophan synthesis and its conversion to auxin involve transamination reactions, which require the vitamin B₆ pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP) as a cofactor. We previously reported that the Arabidopsis mutant pdx1 that is defective in vitamin B₆ biosynthesis displays dramatically reduced primary root growth with smaller meristematic zone and shorter mature cortical cells.¹⁹ In the current investigation, we found that the root tips of pdx1 have reduced cell division capability and reduced DR5::GUS activity, although the induction of this reporter gene by exogenous auxin was not changed. Reciprocal grafting indicates that the short-root phenotype of pdx1 is caused by a root local rather than shoot generated factor(s). Importantly, pdx1 suppresses yucca mutant, an auxin overproducer, in root hair proliferation although it fails to suppress the hypocotyl elongation phenotype.²⁰ Our work thus demonstrated that pdx1 has impaired root local auxin biosynthesis from tryptophan. To test whether the synthesis of tryptophan is also affected in pdx1 mutant, we planted pdx1 together with wild-type seeds on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 5-mehtyl-anthranilate (5-MA), an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate.²¹ Although pdx1 seedlings grew poorly under the control conditions, the growth of wild-type seedlings was more inhibited than that of the pdx1 seedlings on 10 µM 5-MA media (Fig. 1A–D). Compared with the elongated primary root on MS, wild-type seedlings showed very limited root growth on 5-MA (Fig. 1E). The relatively increased tolerance to 5-MA of pdx1 thus indicates that the pdx1 mutant may be defective in Trp biosynthesis, although amino acid analysis of the bulked seedlings did not find clear changes in Trp levels in the mutants (our unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1The pdx1 mutant seedlings are relatively less sensitive to toxic 5-methyl anthranilate (5-MA). (A and C) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0) (A) or pdx1 (C) on MS medium. (B and D) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (B) or pdx1 (D) on MS medium supplemented with 10 µM 5-MA. (E) Eight-day-old seedlings of the wild type or pdx1 on MS medium without or with 10 µM 5-MA supplement. Sterilized seeds were planted directly on the indicated medium and after two days of cold treatment, the plates were incubated under continuous light at 22–24°C before taking pictures.We reported that PDX1 is required for tolerance to oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis.¹⁹ Interestingly, redox homeostasis appears to play a critical role in Arabidopsis root development. The glutathione-deficient mutant root meristemless1 (rml1) and the vitamin C-deficient mutant vitamin C1 (vtc1) both have similar stunted roots.^22,23 Nonetheless, pdx1 is not rescued by either glutathione or vitamin C¹⁹ suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be resulted from a general reduction of antioxidative capacity. Interestingly, ascorbate oxidase is found to be highly expressed in the maize root quiescent center.²⁴ This enzyme can oxidatively decarboxylate auxin in vitro, suggesting that the quiescent center may be a site for metabolizing auxin to control its homeostasis.²⁵ It is therefore likely that the reduced auxin level in pdx1 root tips could be partially caused by increased auxin catabolism resulted from reduced vitamin B₆ level. We thus conducted experiments to test this possibility. A quiescent center-specific promoter WOX5 driven bacterial auxin biosynthetic gene iaaH²⁶ was introduced into pdx1 mutant. The transgenic seeds were planted on media supplemented with different concentrations of indoleacetamide (IAM), the substrate of iaaH protein. Although promotion of lateral root growth was observed at higher IAM concentrations, which indicates increased tryptophan-independent auxin production from the transgene, no change in root elongation was observed between pdx1 with or without the WOX5::iaaH transgene at any concentration of IAM tested (data not shown), suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be due to increased auxin catabolism.Taken together, in addition to auxin transport; temporally, spatially or developmentally coordinated local auxin biosynthesis defines the plant growth and its response to environmental changes.^8,14,15     

Modulation of root branching by a coumarin derivative

A healthy root system is crucial to plant growth and survival. To maintain efficiency of root function, plants have to dynamically modulate root system architecture through various adaptive mechanisms such as lateral root formation to respond to a changing and diversified soil environment. Exogenous application of a coumarin derivative, 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), in Arabidopsis thaliana inhibits seed germination by mainly reducing primary root growth. UDP-glycosyltransferases play an integral role in the biochemical mechanism of 4-MU detoxification in plant roots.1 However, 4-MU treatment also dramatically led to increased lateral root initiation, elongation and density. Moreover, marked root bending at the root-hypocotyl junction and auxin redistribution appeared to contribute to the 4-MU-mediated lateral root formation. We propose that 4-MU would serve as a useful chemical tool to study auxin-mediated root branching.Plant roots are required for the acquisition of water and nutrients, for response to abiotic and biotic factors in the soil, and to anchor the plant in the ground.² To maintain efficiency of root function, plants have to dynamically modulate root system architecture (RSA) by regulation of primary root growth, lateral root (LR) formation and elongation and root hair increase.² Recent studies on root patterning have made significant progress toward understanding the molecular and physiological basis of RSA.³ For example, auxin synthesis, transport and distribution are required for LR initiation and primordium development.² However, determination of the underlying RSA patterning mechanism remains to be elucidated.Coumarins are a group of natural products in plants that originate from the general phenylpropanoid pathway.⁴ They are often found to accumulate in the root tissues⁵ and are involved in plant defense, root development and nitrogen uptake and metabolism.^1,6-8 Some coumarins also receive attention for their pharmacological properties. For example, 4-MU is a potent apoptotic agent with strong anti-invasive and antiangiogenic properties against prostate cancer cells.⁹We have demonstrated that exogenous 4-MU was accumulated in the root system in a concentration-dependent manner. After continuous exposure to 4-MU, growth of the primary roots exhibited a dosage-dependent inhibition of root length, whereas the growth of cotyledon and hypocotyls was not significantly changed. Moreover, 4-MU was found to be glycosylated to 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucoside (4-MU-Glc) by UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) for detoxification.¹ Here we report that marked bending of the primary roots and auxin redistribution in root system contributes to 4-MU-induced root branching. After exposure to 125 µM 4-MU for 6 d, the primary root length was reduced by 25% compared with the untreated seedlings, but the first LR emerged at the root-hypocotyl junction 3 d earlier in the Arabidopsis DR5::GUS lines compared with untreated seedlings. The GUS activity and distribution in the primary roots of DR5::GUS seedlings were coordinately regulated in response to 4-MU treatment (Fig. 1A-D). Interestingly, primary root shape was also affected upon 4-MU treatment as evidenced by marked bending of the primary roots followed by emergence of lateral roots at the root-hypocotyl junctions. As the roots grew, the bend continued to develop and a hook formed at the root-hypocotyl junction (Fig. 1F). After exposure to 125 μM 4-MU for 22 d, abundant lateral roots formed from the bent region (Fig. 1F). We also observed that auxin accumulation in the bent region was significantly reduced after root branching was well established, compared with the untreated plants (Fig. 1E and F). It has been demonstrated that LR formation can be induced mechanically by either gravitropic curvature or by transient bending.^10,11 We suggest that 4-MU-induced LR proliferation is triggered by both mechanical bending of the primary roots at the root-hypocotyl junctions and the local auxin redistribution.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Changes of auxin distribution in response to 4-MU as observed using DR5::GUS reporter fusion. (A) Auxin accumulation in root-hypocotyl junction after exposure to 125 µM 4-MU for 6 d. (B-D) Detection of 4-MU accumulation in root under UV (325 nm). (B) Brightfield; (C) UV channel (325 nm); (D) Merge of (B) and (C). (E) An untreated root system of 22-d-old DR5::GUS seedling. (F) A root system of 22-d-old DR5::GUS seedling in the presence of 125 µM 4-MU. Asterisks indicate the localization of auxin accumulation. It was noted that LR formation upon 4-MU treatment was closely associated with auxin distribution and 4-MU accumulation in roots.Our finding of 4-MU-dependent root patterning is intriguing in light of the important role of RSA in plant physiology. Given that LR initiation is stimulated by 4-MU and that this compound is effectively detoxified in plant roots by glycosylation, a new way to augment root function could be provided through applying 4-MU to modulate RSA. In addition, 4-MU could serve as a useful chemical tool for understanding auxin-mediated root branching, for example, by screening Arabidopsis mutants in the presence of this compound.Coumarins synthesis from phenylpropanoid precursors occurs with an especially high number of structural variations in higher plants via numerous possible modifications at specific positions of the benzene ring.^4,5 For example, hydroxylation of coumarins at 6-position catalyzed by a 2-oxoglutarate-dependant dioxygenase (F6''H1) is important for the biosynthesis of scopoletin.¹² Coumarin synthesis in Arabidopsis plants can result in the accumulation of umbelliferone and its derivative skimmin but not 4-MU⁵ in which 4-MU possesses a pivotal methyl group at the 4-position of the benzene ring. Our results suggest that 4-MU uptake does not benefit plant growth as it is a phytotoxic compound found to inhibit primary root growth and seed germination. This finding explains why Arabidopsis plants do not naturally accumulate 4-MU and its derivatives. Nevertheless, 4-MU has been found and isolated from other higher plants such as Dalbergia volubilis and Eupatorium pauciflorum, indicating the existence of a biosynthetic pathway leading to the formation of 4-MU in nature.¹³     

Irrepressible,truncated Auxin Response Factors: Natural roles and applications in dissecting auxin gene regulation pathways

The molecularly well-characterized auxin signal transduction pathway involves two evolutionarily conserved families interacting through their C-terminal domains III and IV: the Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) and their repressors the Aux/IAAs, to control auxin-responsive genes, among them genes involved in auxin transport.^1,2 We have developed a new genetic tool to study ARF function. Using MONOPTEROS (MP)/ARF5, we have generated a truncated version of MP (MPΔ),³ which has lost the target domains for repression by Aux/IAA proteins. Besides exploring genetic interactions between MP and Aux/IAAs, we used this construct to trace MP’s role in vascular patterning, a previously characterized auxin dependent process.^4,5 Here we summarize examples of naturally occurring truncated ARFs and summarize potential applications of truncated ARFs as analytical tools.     

Growing in darkness: The etiolated lupin hypocotyls

Epigeal germination of a dicot, like lupin (Lupinus albus L.), produces a seedling with a characteristic hypocotyl, which grows in darkness showing a steep growth gradient with an elongation zone just below the apex. The role of phytohormones, such as auxin and ethylene, in etiolated hypocotyl growth has been the object of our research for some time. The recent cloning and expression of three genes of influx and efflux carriers for polar auxin transport (LaAUX1, LaPIN1 and LaPIN3) reinforces a previous model proposed to explain the accumulation of auxin in the upper growth zone of the hypocotyl.Key words: auxin carriers, auxin transport gradient, etiolated hypocotyl growth, Lupinus albusMost plants show a typical axial polar and branched (dendritic) morphology to compensate for their immobility by optimally exploiting the resources available in a limited environment.From Julius von Sachs¹ to Tsvi Sachs² many plant physiologists sought to explain how the axis is maintained and what type of signals are interchanged between poles. It was demonstrated that auxins were the determining factors in maintaining the polarity in shoots and roots and a reductionistic approach leads to conclude that such polarity had to be established at the cellular level. A chemiosmotic theory was then proposed, which implied an asymmetric distribution of efflux carriers at the bottom of a cell, linked to pH gradients to maintain different undissociated/dissociated forms of auxin separated between apoplast and symplast spaces.³In recent years, the use of Arabidopsis thaliana as a plant model has given additional support to the hypothesis that polar auxin transport is restricted to certain cells and mediated by influx (AUX1 and LAX1–4 proteins) and efflux carriers (PIN1–8 proteins).^4–6 Currently, we have a good idea of the topology of Arabidopsis carrier distribution, especially in roots.^4,5 Additional (MDR/PGP)⁷ or parallel (TRH1)⁸ components of the transport system are now emerging.However, while accepting the enormous advances and contributions to plant science provided by the use of Arabidopsis thaliana, we remain true (loyal) to the particular model adopted by the Department of Plant Biology, University of Murcia (Spain) in the 1970''s: the hypocotyl of lupin seedlings cultivated in darkness. In such conditions, the organ grows heterotrophically and longer than in light.The cotyledons and meristem at the top supply nutrients and hormones in a basipetal direction.The hypocotyl is a cylindrical column, with a radial symmetry that clearly shows differentiated tissues: epidermis, cortex, vascular cylinder and pith. Its size allows surgical separation of the tissues using suitable glass capillaries.At the beginning lupin was chosen because it had higher IAA-oxidase activity than pea, bean, oat or barley seedlings. At the time, it was thought that growth was mainly controlled through auxin catabolism (a fruitful line involving peroxidases was developed later). However, the etiolated hypocotyl was soon adopted preferentially by our group because of its qualities as a model for studying the relationship between hormone levels (auxin and ethylene) and growth. Our Portuguese colleagues have also used lupin as a model with successful results.⁹Bellow, we detail the landmarks of our research to date. Hypocotyl growth shows a characteristic pattern. Unlike plants grown in the light, in which all the cells along the hypocotyl elongate continuously throughout the growth period,^10,11 there is a steep growth gradient in the dark with an elongation zone just below the apex¹² (see Fig. 1 for details). This cell growth pattern in etiolated hypocotyls was described in lupin and then in Arabidopsis.¹¹ In this pattern, it is important to note that there is compensation along the organ between the cell diameter and the cell wall thickness. Once the cell growth pattern was known, we investigated its relation with the level of two phytohormones, auxin and ethylene, which might participate in the growth regulation. Special attention was paid to the distribution of endogenous IAA and its relation with growth. The results showed good correlation between the auxin levels and the cell size.^13,14 Auxin from the apex appears to be responsible for hypocotyl growth, since decapitation of seedlings strongly reduced growth, which was restored after the application of exogenous IAA to the cut surface.¹⁵ In light of the fact that growth depended on auxin from the apex, we investigated the nature of the auxin transport and demonstrated that this transport is polarized and sensitive to inhibition by specific inhibitors of polar auxin transport (PAT) such as 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and 1-N-naphthylphtalamic acid (NPA).^16,17 Basipetal PAT mainly occurred in the stele,¹⁵ while cells in the epidermis and outer cortex are the limiting factor in auxin-induced shoot growth.^18–20 The finding that during PAT auxin can move laterally from transporting cells in the stele to the outer tissues of the elongation zone¹⁵ could explain the apparent conflict between the localization of PAT and the auxin target cells for elongation. In fact, epidermal cells acted as a sink for lateral auxin movement (LAM).¹⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of growth and cell size along the hypocotyl in etiolated lupin seedlings. At 3 d, hypocotyls were marked with ink, delimiting four 5-mm long zones including the apical, middle and basal zones. The hypocotyl growth ceased at day 12 and almost no growth was observed in the basal zone after day 3. From 3 to 6 d the growth was localized between the apical and basal zones, while most growth occurring from 6 to 12 d was localized in apical and middle zones. The cell size represents the cell length and cell diameter (the cell wall excluded) and corresponds to the second cell layer of cortex near the vascular cylinder. Similar results were obtained in cells from epidermis and pith. In each zone the cell length increased and the cell diameter showed little change during hypocotyl ageing. The final size at the end of the growth period varied along the hypocotyl, the cells becoming shorter and broader from the apical to the basal zones. In spite of the fact that cell diameter increased basipetally, no significant variation in hypocotyl diameter was found along the organ during the growth period. A morphometric study revealed that cell wall thickness in the apical cells was twice that in the basal cells at the end of the growth period i.e., the thinner apical cells had thicker cell walls, which may help explain the consistency of hypocotyl diameter along the organ.If PAT provides the auxin for growth and elongating growth is restricted to the apical region in etiolated hypocotyls, the question is: how does auxin accumulate in the elongation region?In a former study, we proposed that variations in auxin transport along actively growing lupin hypocotyl could produce such accumulation.²¹ Recently we extensively studied the variation of PAT along the lupin hypocotyls in seedlings of different ages, finding that certain parameters of PAT, such as transport intensity, polarity (basipetal vs acropetal) and sensitivity to NPA inhibition, showed a good correlation with the distribution of growth along the hypocotyl and its variation with ageing.²² These results suggest that a basipetally decreasing gradient in PAT along the hypocotyl may be responsible for the auxin distribution pattern controlling growth, since the existence of such a PAT gradient might generate the so-called barrier effect, which could produce an auxin gradient along the hypocotyl, the auxin content being higher in the apical elongation zone. To investigate whether these PAT variations can be explained in terms of auxin carrier distribution, we isolated three genes coding for auxin influx (LaAUX1) and efflux (LaPIN1 and LaPIN3) carriers, and studied their expression in different tissues along the hypocotyl at different ages.²³ The expression of LaAUX1 and LaPIN3 occurred both in the stele and in the outer tissues, while the expression of LaPIN1 was restricted to the stele and showed a basipetally decreasing gradient along the hypocotyl. The decisive role ascribed to PIN1 in polar auxin transport due to its localization in the basal end of transporting cells,²⁴ and the existence of such a gradient in the expression of LaPIN1 support the hypothesis of a barrier effect (generated by decreasing auxin transport) previously proposed as being responsible for the auxin gradient which controls the growth pattern in etiolated lupin hypocotyls.The acid-growth theory of auxin action was also tested, observing that the elongation growth of etiolated hypocotyl segments of lupin was stimulated by acid pH and IAA. Both factors stimulated growth in a more than additive way, suggesting a synergistic action between them.²⁵ The recent finding of a soluble auxin receptor (intracellular) reinforces the interest of the above study (which has remained a “sleeping beauty”) because pH affects IAA uptake.There are still several questions that must be answered before we can fully understand the growth pattern exhibited by etiolated lupin hypocotyls. Thus, as regards the cause of the PAT gradient, other factors besides the LaPIN1 gradient must be considered. For example, auxin carriers such as some phosphoglycoproteins (PGP), are also expressed differentially along the Arabidopsis hypocotyl and specific PIN-PGP pairings influence PAT by modulating the rates of cellular auxin movement.⁷ The pathway (symplast or apoplast) and mechanism of LAM remains unknown. Although alternative mechanisms have been proposed,²⁶ a previous study in lupin¹⁵ suggested that LAM is a diffusive process and that the IAA metabolism observed in the outer tissues might generate the radial gradient of auxin necessary for the maintenance of its lateral flow. It is thought that this metabolism of IAA occurs once the hormonal action is completed.^25,27 Although NPA does not inhibit LAM, the involvement of auxin efflux carriers cannot be discarded. In fact, the role of PIN carriers in lateral auxin transport towards and from the stele has been described in the root.²⁸ Other phytohormones besides auxin can modulate hypocotyl growth. Thus, the ethylene production rate, the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) content and the ACC oxidase activity decreased along the hypocotyl during the hypocotyl growth period.²⁹ Sensitivity to exogenous ethylene varied during growth, the young apical region being less sensitive than the older basal region.³⁰ Ethylene modified the cell growth pattern in the different tissues.³¹ The ethylene-induced lupin hypocotyl thickening was irreversible and mainly due to an increase in cell diameter. However, the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation produced by ethylene was reversible and involved irreversible inhibition of cell division and, paradoxically, stimulation of cell elongation to produce cells longer than those of the control.³²Studies in Arabidopsis showed that the hypocotyl growth in both light- and dark-grown plants is a process driven by cross-talk between multiple hormones. Interactions between auxins, ethylene, gibberellins and brassinosteroids have been described.^33,34 We think that the etiolated lupin hypocotyl remains a suitable model for confirming some of these results and for opening up new approaches in phytohormone research.     

ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Auxin transport-dependent,stage-specific dynamics of leaf vein formation

For centuries, the formation of vein patterns in the leaf has intrigued biologists, mathematicians and philosophers. In leaf development, files of vein-forming procambial cells emerge from seemingly homogeneous subepidermal tissue through the selection of anatomically inconspicuous preprocambial cells. Although the molecular details underlying the orderly differentiation of veins in the leaf remain elusive, gradually restricted transport paths of the plant hormone auxin have long been implicated in defining sites of vein formation. Several recent advances now appear to converge on a more precise definition of the role of auxin flow at different stages of vascular development. The picture that emerges is that of vein formation as a self-organizing, reiterative, auxin transport-dependent process.Key words: arabidopsis, leaf development, polar auxin transport, procambium, vascular patterningThe vascular system of plants is a branching array of cell files extending through all organs.¹ In dicot leaves, these vascular strands, or ‘veins’, are arranged in a ramified pattern that largely reflects the shape of the leaf (Fig. 1A).^2,3 ‘Lateral veins’ branch from a conspicuous central vein (‘midvein’) that is continuous with the stem vasculature. In many species, lateral veins extend along the leaf edge to form ‘marginal veins’, which connect to adjacent lateral veins to form prominent closed loops. Finally, a series of ‘higher-order veins’ branch from midvein and loops and can either terminate in the lamina (‘free-ending veins’) or join two veins (‘connected veins’).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Conceptual summary of dicot leaf vein formation. (A) Schematics of a simplified mature leaf illustrating midvein (M), first, second and third loops (L1, L2 and L3, respectively)—each derived from corresponding lateral (LV) and marginal (MV) veins—free-ending (FV) and connected (CV) higher-order veins, hydathodes (H) and middle-to-margin positions (decreasing green gradient) as used in the text. (B) State transitions in leaf subepidermal cell differentiation. Available evidence suggests that the vein patterning process is limited to ground meristem cells (white), while subepidermal cells that have begun to acquire mesophyll characteristics are incapable of responding to vein-inducing signals.^11,13,19,38 Expression of preprocambial (blue) and mesophyll emergence markers seem to identify two mutually exclusive and typically irreversible cell states, one leading to procambium (pink) and the other to mature mesophyll (green) formation. The transition from ground meristem to differentiated mesophyll could conceivably occur through a cell state that is formally equivalent to the preprocambial state in vascular differentiation. However, the existence of such a ‘premesophyll’ state (faded gray), the extent of its stability, its mutual exclusivity or competition with the preprocambial state and its responsiveness to vein-inducing signals still remain open questions. (C) Stage-specific dynamics of leaf vein patterning and their dependency on auxin levels and transport as exemplified for loop formation, but in general equally applicable to all veins. Upper series: PIN1-labeled auxin transport paths corresponding to preprocambial cell selection zones (yellow). Note how loops are composed of a lateral PIN1 expression domain (LD) and an initially free-ending marginal PIN1 expression domain (MD). Further, note slightly expanded PIN1 expression domains in a fraction of hydathode-associated third loops during normal development, broad PIN1 domains on the side of local auxin application (arrowhead) and nearly ubiquitous PIN1 expression upon systemic auxin transport inhibition. Middle series: directions of Athb8/J1721-marked preprocambial strand formation (blue arrows). Note middle-to-margin progression of preprocambial strand formation during normal loop development. Further, note margin-to-middle preprocambial strand extension in a fraction of third loops during normal development and in all loops forming on the side of auxin application. Finally, note co-existence of middle-to-margin and margin-to-middle polarities of preprocambial strand extension during the formation of individual loops in response to auxin transport inhibition. Lower series: gradual appearance of procambial cell identity acquisition (pink to magenta). Note simultaneous differentiation of lateral and marginal procambial strands in normal loop development. Further, note successive formation of lateral and marginal procambial strands in a fraction of third loops during normal development and in all loops formed on the side of auxin application and under conditions of reduced auxin transport. Arrows temporally connect successive stages of vein formation. See text for additional details.Vascular cells mature from procambial cells: narrow, cytoplasmdense cells, characteristically arranged in continuous strands.⁴ Leaf procambial strands differentiate from files of isodiametric preprocambial cells, which are selected from the anatomically homogeneous subepidermal tissue of the leaf primordium, the ground meristem (Fig. 1B).^5,6 The mechanism by which ground meristem cells are specified to procambial cell fate is unknown, but an instrumental role for auxin transport and resulting auxin distribution patterns in this process has increasingly gained support.^7–13 This brief essay summarizes a recent group of articles that emphasizes the importance of auxin transport in leaf vein formation.