An investigation of new commercial samples of Methyl Green and Pyronin Y

Summary New commercial samples of Methyl Green (Gurr Certistain), Pyronine G (Gurr Certistain) and Pyronin Y (Polysciences) have been investigated using spectrophotometry, thin layer chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance, in addition to standardized simultaneous and sequential staining methods using purified Ethyl Green and pure Pyronin Y as reference dyes.The Methyl Green was found to be Ethyl Green contaminated with Crystal Violet. It did not have any advantages compared with Ethyl Green supplied by American dye companies. The Pyronine G sample was Pyronin Y with a high dye content that gave good staining results when used with purified Ethyl Green. Pyronin Y from Polysciences was found to be essentially pure Pyronin Y.     

The Purity of Fluorescent Dyes: a Report Delivered to the Scientific Session of the Annual Meeting of the Biological Stain Commission

The Biological Stain Commission occasionally has been requested to certify fluorochromes as biological stains. Although formal certification is unlikely in the near future, the Commission is nevertheless concerned with the quality of these reagents. Commercial samples of fourteen fluorochromes were investigated for the presence of fluorescent organic impurities using reverse phase thin layer chromatography. Our findings suggest that some fluorochrome dyes are pure, but most are impure. Most fluorochromes vary in purity among vendors and among batches sold by single vendors. Impurities may be present at such high concentration that little of the presumed compound is present. Some impurities behave quite differently from the nominal dye. This may either create confusion or it might be useful. In the latter case, however, the impurity may occur only in a single batch. Impurities result from problems related to organic syntheses, separations, and economics. Solving those problems is often expensive, and what is expensive may not be performed. Fortunately, knowledge of synthetic chemistry often permits identification of fluorochromes likely to be impure. Moreover, predictions of likely staining effects of particular impurities can be made if appropriate structure-activity models are available. Possible actions by the Commission aimed at limiting the problems resulting from impurities of fluorescent dyes are noted.     

A method for determining identity and relative purity of carmine, carminic acid and aminocarminic acid

Carmine is one of the few dyes currently certified by the Biological Stain Commission that is not assayed for dye content. Existing assay methods are complex and do not differentiate the three cochineal derivatives carmine, carminic acid and aminocarminic acid. The latter dye is relatively new to the food trade as an acid-stable red colorant and may eventually enter the biological stains market. The assay proposed here is a two-step procedure using quantitative spectrophotometric analysis at high pH (12.5-12.6) followed by a qualitative scan of a low pH (1.90-2.10) solution. Carmine is distinct at high pH, and the remaining dyes are easily distinguished at low pH. Four instances of mislabeling are documented from 18 commercial products, but the mislabeled dyes were not certified dyes. Samples from nearly all lots of carmine certified by the Biological Stain Commission from 1920 to 2004 proved to be carmine, but they varied widely in dye content. Batches from 1920 through the 1940s were significantly richer in dye content. Variability has been extreme since 2000, and most of the poorest lots have been submitted since 1990.     

A method for determining identity and relative purity of carmine,carminic acid and aminocarminic acid

Carmine is one of the few dyes currently certified by the Biological Stain Commission that is not assayed for dye content. Existing assay methods are complex and do not differentiate the three cochineal derivatives carmine, carminic acid and aminocarminic acid. The latter dye is relatively new to the food trade as an acid-stable red colorant and may eventually enter the biological stains market. The assay proposed here is a two-step procedure using quantitative spectrophotometric analysis at high pH (12.5–12.6) followed by a qualitative scan of a low pH (1.90–2.10) solution. Carmine is distinct at high pH, and the remaining dyes are easily distinguished at low pH. Four instances of mislabeling are documented from 18 commercial products, but the mislabeled dyes were not certified dyes. Samples from nearly all lots of carmine certified by the Biological Stain Commission from 1920 to 2004 proved to be carmine, but they varied widely in dye content. Batches from 1920 through the 1940s were significantly richer in dye content. Variability has been extreme since 2000, and most of the poorest lots have been submitted since 1990.     

A method for determining identity and relative purity of carmine, carminic acid and aminocarminic acid.

Carmine is one of the few dyes currently certified by the Biological Stain Commission that is not assayed for dye content. Existing assay methods are complex and do not differentiate the three cochineal derivatives carmine, carminic acid and aminocarminic acid. The latter dye is relatively new to the food trade as an acid-stable red colorant and may eventually enter the biological stains market. The assay proposed here is a two-step procedure using quantitative spectrophotometric analysis at high pH (12.5-12.6) followed by a qualitative scan of a low pH (1.90-2.10) solution. Carmine is distinct at high pH, and the remaining dyes are easily distinguished at low pH. Four instances of mislabeling are documented from 18 commercial products, but the mislabeled dyes were not certified dyes. Samples from nearly all lots of carmine certified by the Biological Stain Commission from 1920 to 2004 proved to be carmine, but they varied widely in dye content. Batches from 1920 through the 1940s were significantly richer in dye content. Variability has been extreme since 2000, and most of the poorest lots have been submitted since 1990.     

Staining Problems with Eosin Y: A Note from the Biological Stain Commission

In 1980, eosin Y was the certified dye with which technologists encountered most problems. The specific problem most frequently brought to the attention of the Biological Stain Commission was that solutions of eosin Y formed a precipitate and failed to stain cytoplasm red when used as a counterstain to hematoxylin.     

Accomplishments of the Trustees and laboratory staff of the Biological Stain Commission, 2002–2013

During the 12 years from 2002 to 2013, the Trustees and laboratory personnel of the Biological Stain Commission (BSC) can claim many accomplishments. These accomplishments are itemized under 11 categories: continuous publication of the official journal, Biotechnic & Histochemistry; production of four special issues of Biotechnic & Histochemistry devoted to specific dyes or stains; standardization of staining and dye purity; mechanisms of staining and prediction of dye behavior; publication of books or book chapters; effects of fixation and processing on staining; cancer research; immunohistochemistry; BSC Laboratory activities; miscellaneous publications; and administrative accomplishments.     

Certification procedures for nuclear fast red (Kernechtrot), CI 60760

Nuclear fast red (CI 60760), also known as Kernechtrot, is commonly used in conjunction with an excess of aluminum ions as a red nuclear counterstain following histochemical procedures that yield blue products. The dye has also been used as a histochemical and colorimetric reagent for calcium. Unsatisfactory samples of nuclear fast red are encountered occasionally, and confusion has resulted from applying the name of the dye to neutral red (CI 50040), an unrelated compound with different properties. Tests for the identity and performance of nuclear fast red have been developed in the laboratory of the Biological Stain Commission. The Commission will now accept samples submitted by vendors for certification. We describe here the spectrophotometric, chromatographic and biological staining methods that are used to identify and test nuclear fast red.     

Report from the President the Biological Stain Commission: Its Goals, Its Past and Its Present Status

This is a brief overview of the goals, evolution, and present status of the Biological Stain Commission. The main function of the Commission is the testing and certification of dye batches intended for biological applications. The testing is supported by charges made for batch testing and by the sale of certification labels affixed to individual dye containers. Submission of dyes for testing is voluntary, depending on the cooperation of the companies who sell them and the consumers who buy them. The supportive role of the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry—both past and present—is not well known and should be. Increasingly federal regulations affect the production, availability, and cost of dyes. Commission income from the sale of labels has decreased in recent years. Continuation of its work requires changes that will produce more income. Much dye is now sold in solutions instead of dry powders. The value of using Stain Commission certified dyes whenever possible is illustrated by the case of basic fuchsin. Years ago this dye was a mixture. Most basic fuchsin now marketed consists mainly of either pararosanilin (Colour Index No. 42500) or rosanilin (C.I. No. 42510). The Biological Stain Commission discovered that some certified batches of both pararosanilin and rosanilin sold as “basic fuchsin” had incorrect C.I. numbers on the labels. Sometimes that caused failure of the aldehyde fuchsin stain. Unless made with pararosanilin, aldehyde fuchsin does not stain pancreatic islet B-cells, elastic fibers, and hepatitis B surface antigen in unoxidized sections. Mislabelling by packagers may interfere with other applications of pararosanilin and rosanilin. The Commission acted to publicize and correct this problem. Biological Stain Commission publications help educate microscopists and histotechnologists about dyes and their best use. Stain Commission representatives from member scientific societies provide valuable input about changes in the availability and quality of such dyes as hematoxylin and others; they also provide useful feedback to their societies about dye problems. Each new generation of biologists and histotechnologists should be taught the importance of using only Stain Commission certified stains when available. They should be taught also to notify the Stain Commission whenever they experience problems with any certified dye.     

The composition and properties of Gallocyanin-chrome alum stains

Synopsis The composition of 5 common Gallocyanin-chrome alum (GCA) preparations were studied by thin layer chromatography, electrophoresis and spectrophotometry. The GCA preparations were found to be mixtures of one or more Gallocyanin-chromium co-ordination complexes, chromic ions, and, usually, free Gallocyanin. The differences in composition of the various preparations were due to differences in the preparative boiling times. The differences in histological staining properties depended on the concentrations of free Gallocyanin.The staining action of the GCA mixtures was similar to that of a typical basic dye such as Pyronin Y, both with regard to the materials stained and the effects of varying the pH and salt content of the dyebath.The chemistry of the commonest GCA co-ordination complex was investigated. It was found to have the composition 21 Gallocyanin: chromium (G₂Cr). The chromic ion was chelated to the aminocarboxylic acid. The complex carried a net positive charge in the pH range 1–9, and would thus be expected to behave similarly to basic dyes. In fact GCA was no more specific for nucleic acids than other basic dyes.     

Report from the President

Although the original Commission on Standardization of Biological Stains was first organized in 1921, it was not until 1944 that this was incorporated as an independent, nonprofit organization known as the Biological Stain Commission (see Clark 1974). The certification of dyes, as indicated by special labels purchased by manufacturers or vendors for attachment to the dye containers, originated with the parent organization and has continued to this day. The objectives of the Biological Stain Commission (BSC) are 1) to identify and standardize the content and performance of dyes and dye preparations used in staining biological tissues and products, 2) to issue labels of certification to companies that buy these to inform consumers that their certified dyes meet the specifications of the BSC, 3) to carry out and to support investigations on dyes and their performance, 4) to publish scientific data concerning biological stains and their use, and 5) to maintain, through scientific meetings and correspondence, an active “dialogue” among scientific and industrial personnel concerned with biological stains. The present report summarizes Commission activity and some of the changes that have occurred during the past five years.     

Current applications of orcein in histochemistry. A brief review with some new observations concerning influence of dye batch variation and aging of dye solutions on staining

Current uses of orcein to demonstrate elastic fibers and, following permanganate oxidation (Shikata's modification), hepatitis B surface antigen, copper associated protein, and sulfated mucins, are reviewed. Variations in staining performance with batch of dye and age of dye solution is also discussed. Additional experimental findings support the view that the orcein stain for elastic tissue and Shikata's modification produces consistent, high quality results as long as appropriate controls and suitable dye batches, e.g., Biological Stain Commission certified dyes, are used.     

Staining of macromolecules: possible mechanisms and examples

This review is based on a presentation given at the Biological Stain Commission meeting in June 2008. I discuss staining as an interaction between dye, solvent, and biological macromolecules. Most staining takes place in water, where the physico-chemical properties of the macromolecules are particularly important. Staining from aqueous solution is summarized. The first step is diffusion–ion exchange, which builds up the dye ion concentration close to the appropriately charged tissue constituents. While charge interactions are important for selectivity and build-up of dye ions around specific tissue and cell constituents, they have in most cases little to do with actual dye binding. The next step, actual binding, is predominantly between aromatic and other non-polar parts of the dye and corresponding groups in the tissue constituent. This results in a reduction of the total hydrophobic area exposed to water, hence the term hydrophobic interaction. Because dye binding is predominantly by dispersive forces, the larger the aromatic dye system and the fewer the number of charges on the dye, the greater the substantivity or affinity. Some relatively straightforward anionic or cationic one-step staining systems are discussed also. These include amyloid staining with Congo red, elastin staining with orceins, collagen staining with picrofuchsin, DNA–RNA staining with methyl green-pyronin Y, acid heteroglycan staining with Alcian blue, and metachromatic staining.     

Current applications of orcein in histochemistry. A brief review with some new observations concerning influence of dye batch variation and aging of dye solutions on staining

Current uses of orcein to demonstrate elastic fibers and, following permanganate oxidation (Shikata's modification), hepatitis B surface antigen, copper associated protein, and sulfated mucins, are reviewed. Variations in staining performance with batch of dye and age of dye solution is also discussed. Additional experimental findings support the view that the orcein stain for elastic tissue and Shikata's modification produces consistent, high quality results as long as appropriate controls and suitable dye batches, e.g., Biological Stain Commission certified dyes, are used.     

Coming Full Circle: a Brief History of the Domestic Synthetic Dye and Biological Stain Industries

The synthetic dye industry is traced from its inception in England in 1856 to the European Continent and finally to the United States. The primitive state of this industry in America prior to World War I is described as is the desperate effort to develop the neglected technology once imports were difficult to obtain. Topics include biological stains, formation of the Biological Stain Commission (BSC), pioneers in the industry, dye shortages after World War II, formation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the decline of the domestic dye industry after the EPA was instituted, and the present state of the domestic dye industry.     

Coming Full Circle: a Brief History of the Domestic Synthetic Dye and Biological Stain Industries

The synthetic dye industry is traced from its inception in England in 1856 to the European Continent and finally to the United States. The primitive state of this industry in America prior to World War I is described as is the desperate effort to develop the neglected technology once imports were difficult to obtain. Topics include biological stains, formation of the Biological Stain Commission (BSC), pioneers in the industry, dye shortages after World War II, formation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the decline of the domestic dye industry after the EPA was instituted, and the present state of the domestic dye industry.     

Only aldehyde fuchsin made from pararosanilin stains pancreatic B cell granules and elastic fibers in unoxidized microsections: problems caused by mislabelling of certain basic fuchsins

The most distinctive property of aldehyde fuchsin is its staining of certain nonionic proteins and peptides in unoxidized cells and tissues. These substances include granules of pancreatic islet B cells, elastic fibers and hepatitis B surface antigen. Aldehyde fuchsin made from two different basic fuchsins, each certified by the Biological Stain Commission and labelled C.I. (Colour Index) No. 42500 (pararosanilin), did not stain pancreatic B cells at all. Stain Commission's records and retesting showed that each of the "faulty" basic fuchsins was not pararosanilin, but rosanilin, whose Colour Index number is 42510. These basic fuchsins were labelled with the wrong Colour Index number when packaged. Additional basic fuchsins were coded by V.M.E. and tested by R.W.M. for their capacity to make satisfactory aldehyde fuchsins. Only certain of these aldehyde fuchsins stained unoxidized pancreatic islet B cells. The same aldehyde fuchsins stained elastic fibers strongly. Each basic fuchsin whose aldehyde fuchsin was judged satisfactory proved to be pararosanilin. Aldehyde fuchsin solutions made from other basic fuchsins stained elastic fibers only weakly and did not stain pancreatic B cells at all in unoxidized sections. Each basic fuchsin whose aldehyde fuchsin was unsatisfactory proved to be rosanilin. It appears that only aldehyde fuchsin made from pararosanilin stains unoxidized pancreatic B cell granules dependably. We found that basic fuchsins from additional lots of Commission-certified pararosanilin and rosanilin were also labelled with incorrect Colour Index numbers when packaged. Steps were taken to prevent recurrences of such mislabelling which has made it difficult until now to correlate differences in the properties of pararosanilin and rosanilin. A table is provided of all basic fuchsins that have been certified by the Biological Stain Commission since 1963 when they began the practice of subdesignating basic fuchsins according to whether they are pararosanilins or nonpararosanilins. The consumer can readily determine from the certification number on the label the correct subdesignation of any Commission-certified basic fuchsin listed here. Until now, mislabelling of some lots of pararosanilin as rosanilin and vice-versa has confused and frustrated the users of basic fuchsins in other applications such as the carbol fuchsin staining of tubercle bacilli and certain cytochemical tests, e.g. esterase and acid phosphatase, that utilize hexazotized pararosanilin as a coupling reagent. Consumers experiencing trouble with any Commission-certified dye should look to the Biological Stain Commission for help. This is an important reason for purchasing, whenever possible, only Biological Stain Commission certified dyes.     

Standardized methyl green-pyronin Y procedures using pure dyes

Summary Fully standardized Methyl Green—Pyronin methods are presented. Pure Pyronin Y and purified Methyl Green or Ethyl Green are used either simultaneously in one dye bath or are used as a sequence of Pyronin Y and Ethyl or Methyl Green. Both methods, as shown by enzymatic pretreatment, give a reliable and reproducible staining of DNA with Ethyl or Methyl Green and of RNA with Pyronin Y on Carnoy fixed material. On formaldehyde fixed material it was found advantageous to use the sequential method as chromatin was hereby stained green instead of blue as seen with the simultaneous method.     

Revised procedures for the certification of carmine (C.I. 75470, Natural red 4) as a biological stain

Carmine is one of the original dyes certified by the Biological Stain Commission (BSC). Until now it has lacked both an assay procedure for dye content and a means to positively identify the dye. The methods for testing carmine in the laboratory of the BSC have been revised to include spectrophotometric examination at pH 12.5-12.6 to determine that the dye is carmine (λ_max=530-335 nm). The maximum absorbance of a solution containing 100 mg of dye per liter of water, adjusted to pH 12.5-12.6, which provides a relative measure of dye content, should lie in the range 1.2 to 1.8. If the dye is not carmine, spectrophotometry at pH 1.9-2.1 shows whether it is carminic acid (λ_max=490-500 nm) or 4-aminocarminic acid (λ_max=525-530 nm). The latter two dyes, which are also called carmine when sold as food colorants, have physical properties different from those of true carmine. The functional tests for carmine as a biological stain are Orth's lithium-carmine method for nuclei, Southgate's mucicarmine method for mucus, and Best's carmine method for glycogen.     

Dyes from a twenty-first century perspective

In June 2008, the Biological Stain Commission sponsored A Seminar on Dyes and Staining the purpose of which was twofold: first, to show that very useful information applicable to biomedical dyes and staining is available from unrelated disciplines and second, to summarize modern thinking on how dyes, solvents, and tissues interact to produce selective staining. In this introduction to the papers from the symposium, we acknowledge that biomedical dye research has declined as newer technologies have gained importance. We should point out, however, that dyes and staining still are vitally important. Moreover, needs abound for innovative studies concerned with dye analysis, synthesis, and mode of action. Concepts and tools from unrelated fields hold promise for significant breakthroughs in many areas of interest.