Components of the human spindle checkpoint control mechanism localize specifically to the active centromere on dicentric chromosomes

The spindle checkpoint control mechanism functions to ensure faithful chromosome segregation by delaying cell division until all chromosomes are correctly oriented on the mitotic spindle. Initially identified in budding yeast, several mammalian spindle checkpoint-associated proteins have recently been identified and partially characterized. These proteins associate with all active human centromeres, including neocentromeres, in the early stages of mitosis prior to the commencement of anaphase. We have examined the status of proteins associated with the checkpoint protein complex (BUB1, BUBR1, BUB3, MAD2), the anaphase-promoting complex (Tsg24, p55CDC), and other proteins associated with mitotic checkpoint control (ERK1, 3F3/2 epitope, hZW10), on a human dicentric chromosome. Each of these proteins was found to specifically associate with only the active centromere, suggesting that only active centromeres participate in the spindle checkpoint. This finding complements previous studies on multicentric chromosomes demonstrating specific association of structural and motor-related centromere proteins with active centromeres, and suggests that centromere inactivation is accompanied by loss of all functionally important centromere proteins.     

Mapping of a human centromere onto the DNA by topoisomerase II cleavage

We have mapped the positions of topoisomerase II binding sites at the centromere of the human Y chromosome using etoposide-mediated DNA cleavage. A single region of cleavage is seen at normal centromeres, spanning ~50 kb within the centromeric alphoid array, but this pattern is abolished at two inactive centromeres. It therefore provides a marker for the position of the active centromere. Although the underlying centromeric DNA structure is variable, the position of the centromere measured in this way is fixed relative to the Yp edge of the array, and has retained the same position for >100 000 years.     

Dicentric chromosome formation and epigenetics of centromere formation in plants

Plant centromeres are generally composed of tandem arrays of simple repeats that form a complex chromosome locus where the kinetochore forms and microtubules attach during mitosis and meiosis. Each chromosome has one centromere region, which is essential for accurate division of the genetic material. Recently, chromosomes containing two centromere regions (called dicentric chromosomes) have been found in maize and wheat. Interestingly, some dicentric chromosomes are stable because only one centromere is active and the other one is inactivated. Because such arrays maintain their typical structure for both active and inactive centromeres, the specification of centromere activity has an epigenetic component independent of the DNA sequence. Under some circumstances, the inactive centromeres may recover centromere function, which is called centromere reactivation. Recent studies have highlighted the important changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, that occur during centromere inactivation and reactivation.     

Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis

Reports of centromere pairing in early meiotic cells have appeared sporadically over the past thirty years. Recent experiments demonstrate that early centromere pairing occurs between non-homologous centromeres. As meiosis proceeds, centromeres change partners, becoming arranged in homologous pairs. Investigations of these later centromere pairs indicate that paired homologous centromeres are actively associated rather than positioned passively, side-by-side. Meiotic centromere pairing has been observed in organisms as diverse as mice, wheat and yeast, indicating that non-homologous centromere pairing in early meiosis and active homologous centromere pairing in later meiosis might be themes in meiotic chromosome behavior. Moreover, such pairing could have previously unrecognized roles in mediating chromosome organization or architecture that impact meiotic segregation fidelity.     

Visualization of centromere proteins CENP-B and CENP-C on a stable dicentric chromosome in cytological spreads

We have screened for the presence of two centromere autoantigens, CENP-B (80 kDa) and CENP-C (140 kDa) at the inactive centromere of a naturally occurring stable dicentric chromosome using specific antibodies that do not cross-react with any other chromosomal proteins. In order to discriminate between the active and inactive centromeres on this chromosome we have developed a modification of the standard methanol/acetic acid fixation procedure that allows us to obtain high-quality cytological spreads that retain antigenicity with the anti-centromere antibodies. We have noted three differences in the immunostaining patterns with specific anti-CENP-B and CENP-C antibodies. (1) The amount of detectable CENP-B varies from chromosome to chromosome. The amount of CENPC appears to be more or less the same on all chromosomes. (2) CENP-B is present at both active and inactive centromeres of stable dicentric autosomes. CENP-C is not detectable at the inactive centromeres. (3) While immunofluorescence with anti-CENP-C antibodies typically gives two discrete spots, staining with anti-CENP-B often appears as a single bright bar connecting both sister centromeres. This suggests that while CENP-C may be confined to the outer centromere in the kinetochore region, CENP-B may be distributed throughout the entire centromere. Our data suggest that CENP-C is likely to be a component of some invariant chromosomal substructure, such as the kinetochore. CENPB may be involved in some other aspect of centromere function, such as chromosome movement or DNA packaging.Abbreviations CENP centromere protein     

Mutational analysis of the central centromere targeting domain of human centromere protein C, (CENP-C)

Human centromere protein C (CENP-C) is an essential component of the inner kinetochore plate. A central region of CENP-C can bind DNA in vitro and is sufficient for targeting the protein to centromeres in vivo, raising the possibility that this domain mediates centromere localization via direct DNA binding. We performed a detailed molecular dissection of this domain to understand the mechanism by which CENP-C assembles at centromeres. By a combination of PCR mutagenesis and transient expression of GFP-tagged proteins in HeLa cells, we identified mutations that disrupt centromere localization of CENP-C in vivo. These cluster in a 12 amino acid region adjacent to the core domain required for in vitro DNA binding. This region is conserved between human and mouse, but is divergent or absent in invertebrate and plant CENP-C homologues. We suggest that these 12 amino acids are essential to confer specificity to DNA binding by CENP-C in vivo, or to mediate interaction with another as yet unidentified centromere component. A differential yeast two-hybrid screen failed to identify interactions specific to this sequence, but nonetheless identified 14 candidate proteins that interact with the central region of CENP-C. This collection of mutations and interacting proteins comprise a useful resource for further elucidating centromere assembly.     

The centromere of budding yeast

Stable maintenance of genetic information during meiosis and mitosis is dependent on accurate chromosome transmission. The centromere is a key component of the segregational machinery that couples chromosomes with the spindle apparatus. Most of what is known about the structure and function of the centromeres has been derived from studies on yeast cells. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the centromere DNA requirements for mitotic centromere function have been defined and some of the proteins required for an active complex have been identified. Centromere DNA and the centromere proteins form a complex that has been studied extensively at the chromatin level. Finally, recent findings suggest that assembly and activation of the centromere are integrated in tethe cell cycle.     

Deletion of specific sequences or modification of centromeric chromatin are responsible for Y chromosome centromere inactivation

Summary Stable dicentric chromosomes behave as monocentrics because one of the centromeres is inactive. The cause of centromere inactivation is unknown; changes in centromere chromatin conformation and loss of centromeric DNA elements have been proposed as possible mechanisms. We studied the phenomenon of inactivation in two Y centromeres, having as a control genetically identical active Y centromeres. The two cases have the following karyotypes: 45,X/46,X,i(Y)(q12) and 46,XY/ 47,XY,+t(X;Y)(p22.3;p11.3). The analysis of the behaviour of the active and inactive Y chromosome centromeres after Da-Dapi staining, CREST immunofluorescence, and in situ hybridization with centromeric probes leads us to conclude that, in the case of the isochromosome, a true deletion of centromeric chromatin is responsible for its stability, whereas in the second case, stability of the dicentric (X;Y) is the result of centromere chromatin modification.     

INCENP loss from an inactive centromere correlates with the loss of sister chromatid cohesion

Inactive centromeres of stable dicentric chromosomes provide a unique opportunity to examine the resolution of sister chromatid cohesion in mitosis. Here we show for the first time that inactive centromeres are composed of heterochromatin, as defined by the presence of heterochromatin protein HP1(Hs alpha). We then show that both the inner centromere protein (INCENP) and its binding partner Aurora-B/AIM-1 kinase can also be detected at the inactive centromere. Thus, targeting of the chromosomal passengers is not dependent upon the presence of an active centromere/kinetochore. Furthermore, we show that the association of INCENP with the inactive centromere correlates strictly with the state of cohesion between sister chromatids: loss of cohesion is accompanied by loss of detectable INCENP. These results are consistent with recent suggestions that one function of the chromosomal passenger proteins may be to regulate sister chromatid separation in mitosis.     

New clues to understand how CENP-A maintains centromere identity

The centromere is a specialized chromosomal region that directs the formation of the kinetochore, a huge protein assembly that acts as the attachment site for spindle microtubules and carries out chromosome movement during cell division. Centromere loss or the presence of extra centromeres adversely affect chromosome segregation and may result in aneuploidy, a condition found in many human tumors and a major cause of miscarriages and birth defects. Consequently, understanding the basis of centromere determination and propagation is of great relevance to both fundamental and clinical research. In recent years, it has become clear that centromeres are defined by the presence of a histone H3 variant known as Centromere Protein A, CENP-A, or CenH3. Much effort has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms that drive the assembly of CENP-A containing nucleosomes exclusively onto centromeric DNA, as well as the peculiar structure of these nucleosomes. We have recently developed an immunofluorescence-based assay that measures CENP-A incorporation in the centromeres of chromosomes assembled in Xenopus egg extracts. The spatial and temporal specificity of CENP-A deposition observed in human cells can be recapitulated in this in vitro system, making it suitable to dissect the precise role of the different factors that contribute to this pathway. Here, we discuss our results together with other recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms that mediate centromere inheritance.     

The accuracy of segregation of human mini-chromosomes varies in different vertebrate cell lines, correlates with the extent of centromere formation and provides evidence for a trans-acting centromere maintenance activity

We show that the accuracy of mitotic segregation of three engineered, mapped human mini-chromosomes differs between human, mouse and chicken cell lines. We have studied the cause of these differences by analysing the extent of centromere formation on one mini-chromosome immunocytochemically. In human and chicken cell lines the mini-chromosomes segregate accurately and form centromeres but in one mouse cell line centromere formation is undetectable and mitotic segregation is inaccurate. These results indicate that the centromere is maintained by an activity that functions in trans and varies either in amount or specificity between different cells. Structurally defined mini-chromosomes may allow this activity to be studied.     

The activation of a neocentromere in Drosophila requires proximity to an endogenous centromere

The centromere is essential for proper segregation and inheritance of genetic information. Centromeres are generally regulated to occur exactly once per chromosome; failure to do so leads to chromosome loss or damage and loss of linked genetic material. The mechanism for faithful regulation of centromere activity and number is unknown. The presence of ectopic centromeres (neocentromeres) has allowed us to probe the requirements and characteristics of centromere activation, maintenance, and structure. We utilized chromosome derivatives that placed a 290-kilobase "test segment" in three different contexts within the Drosophila melanogaster genome--immediately adjacent to (1) centromeric chromatin, (2) centric heterochromatin, or (3) euchromatin. Using irradiation mutagenesis, we freed this test segment from the source chromosome and genetically assayed whether the liberated "test fragment" exhibited centromere activity. We observed that this test fragment behaved differently with respect to centromere activity when liberated from different chromosomal contexts, despite an apparent sequence identity. Test segments juxtaposed to an active centromere produced fragments with neocentromere activity, whereas test segments far from centromeres did not. Once established, neocentromere activity was stable. The imposition of neocentromere activity on juxtaposed DNA supports the hypothesis that centromere activity and identity is capable of spreading and is regulated epigenetically.     

Identification of a subdomain of CENP-B that is necessary and sufficient for localization to the human centromere

We have combined in vivo and in vitro approaches to investigate the function of CENP-B, a major protein of human centromeric heterochromatin. Expression of epitope-tagged deletion derivatives of CENP-B in HeLa cells revealed that a single domain less than 158 residues from the amino terminus of the protein is sufficient to localize CENP-B to centromeres. Centromere localization was abolished if as few as 28 amino acids were removed from the amino terminus of CENP-B. The centromere localization signal of CENP-B can function in an autonomous fashion, relocating a fused bacterial enzyme to centromeres. The centromere localization domain of CENP-B specifically binds in vitro to a subset of alpha-satellite DNA monomers. These results suggest that the primary mechanism for localization of CENP-B to centromeres involves the recognition of a DNA sequence found at centromeres. Analysis of the distribution of this sequence in alpha-satellite DNA suggests that CENP-B binding may have profound effects on chromatin structure at centromeres.     

The evolutionary life cycle of the resilient centromere

The centromere is a chromosomal structure that is essential for the accurate segregation of replicated eukaryotic chromosomes to daughter cells. In most centromeres, the underlying DNA is principally made up of repetitive DNA elements, such as tandemly repeated satellite DNA and retrotransposable elements. Paradoxically, for such an essential genomic region, the DNA is rapidly evolving both within and between species. In this review, we show that the centromere locus is a resilient structure that can undergo evolutionary cycles of birth, growth, maturity, death and resurrection. The birth phase is highlighted by examples in humans and other organisms where centromere DNA deletions or chromosome rearrangements can trigger the epigenetic assembly of neocentromeres onto genomic sites without typical features of centromere DNA. In addition, functional centromeres can be generated in the laboratory using various methodologies. Recent mapping of the foundation centromere mark, the histone H3 variant CENP-A, onto near-complete genomes has uncovered examples of new centromeres which have not accumulated centromere repeat DNA. During the growth period of the centromere, repeat DNA begins to appear at some, but not all, loci. The maturity stage is characterised by centromere repeat accumulation, expansions and contractions and the rapid evolution of the centromere DNA between chromosomes of the same species and between species. This stage provides inherent centromere stability, facilitated by repression of gene activity and meiotic recombination at and around the centromeres. Death to a centromere can result from genomic instability precipitating rearrangements, deletions, accumulation of mutations and the loss of essential centromere binding proteins. Surprisingly, ancestral centromeres can undergo resurrection either in the field or in the laboratory, via as yet poorly understood mechanisms. The underlying principle for the preservation of a centromeric evolutionary life cycle is to provide resilience and perpetuity for the all-important structure and function of the centromere.     

Co-localization of centromere activity,proteins and topoisomerase II within a subdomain of the major human X alpha-satellite array

Dissection of human centromeres is difficult because of the lack of landmarks within highly repeated DNA. We have systematically manipulated a single human X centromere generating a large series of deletion derivatives, which have been examined at four levels: linear DNA structure; the distribution of constitutive centromere proteins; topoisomerase IIalpha cleavage activity; and mitotic stability. We have determined that the human X major alpha-satellite locus, DXZ1, is asymmetrically organized with an active subdomain anchored approximately 150 kb in from the Xp-edge. We demonstrate a major site of topoisomerase II cleavage within this domain that can shift if juxtaposed with a telomere, suggesting that this enzyme recognizes an epigenetic determinant within the DXZ1 chromatin. The observation that the only part of the DXZ1 locus shared by all deletion derivatives is a highly restricted region of <50 kb, which coincides with the topo isomerase II cleavage site, together with the high levels of cleavage detected, identify topoisomerase II as a major player in centromere biology.     

Accurate identification of centromere locations in yeast genomes using Hi-C

Centromeres are essential for proper chromosome segregation. Despite extensive research, centromere locations in yeast genomes remain difficult to infer, and in most species they are still unknown. Recently, the chromatin conformation capture assay, Hi-C, has been re-purposed for diverse applications, including de novo genome assembly, deconvolution of metagenomic samples and inference of centromere locations. We describe a method, Centurion, that jointly infers the locations of all centromeres in a single genome from Hi-C data by exploiting the centromeres’ tendency to cluster in three-dimensional space. We first demonstrate the accuracy of Centurion in identifying known centromere locations from high coverage Hi-C data of budding yeast and a human malaria parasite. We then use Centurion to infer centromere locations in 14 yeast species. Across all microbes that we consider, Centurion predicts 89% of centromeres within 5 kb of their known locations. We also demonstrate the robustness of the approach in datasets with low sequencing depth. Finally, we predict centromere coordinates for six yeast species that currently lack centromere annotations. These results show that Centurion can be used for centromere identification for diverse species of yeast and possibly other microorganisms.     

Decondensation of pericentric heterochromatin alters the sequence of centromere separation in mouse cells

The centromeres of a genome separate in a sequential, nonrandom manner that is apparently dependent upon the quantity and quality of pericentric heterochromatin. It is becoming increasingly clear that the biological properties of a centromere depend upon its physicochemical makeup, such as its tertiary structure, and not necessarily on its particular nucleotide sequence. To test this idea we altered the physical state of the AT-rich pericentric heterochromatin of mouse with Hoechst 33258 (bis-benzimidazole) and studied a biological parameter, viz., sequence of separation. We report that an alteration in the physical state of heterochromatin, i.e., decondensation, is accompanied by aberrations in the pattern of centromere separation. The most dramatic effect seems to be on chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin. Many chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin that, in untreated cells, separate late tend to separate early. Decondensation with Hoechst 33258 does not seem to alter the sequence of separation of inactive centromeres relative to that of active centromeres. These data indicate that alteration in the physical parameters of the pericentric heterochromatin might dispose the centromeres to errors. It is likely that this aberration results from early replication of the pericentric heterochromatin associated with active centromeres. Received: 24 August 1998; in revised form: 24 August 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Heterogeneity and maintenance of centromere plasmid copy number inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

We developed a novel approach to quantitate the heterogeneity of centromere number in yeast, and the cellular capacity for excess centromeres. Small circular plasmids were constructed to contain theCUP1 metallothionein gene,ARS1 (autonomously replicating sequence) and a conditionally functional centromere (GAL1–GAL10 promoter controlled centromere). TheCUP1 gene provided a gene dosage marker, and therefore a genetic determinant of plasmid copy number. Growth of cells on glucose is permissive for centromere function, while growth on galactose renders the centromere nonfunctional and the plasmids are segregated in an asymmetric fashion. We identified lines of cells containing increased numbers of plasmids after transformation. Cell lines containing as many as five to ten active centromeres are stably maintained in the absence of genetic selection. Thus haploid yeast cells can tolerate a 50% increase in their centromere number without affecting progression through the cell cycle. This system provides the opportunity to address issues of specific cellular controls on centromere copy number.     

A novel cell response triggered by interphase centromere structural instability

Interphase centromeres are crucial domains for the proper assembly of kinetochores at the onset of mitosis. However, it is not known whether the centromere structure is under tight control during interphase. This study uses the peculiar property of the infected cell protein 0 of herpes simplex virus type 1 to induce centromeric structural damage, revealing a novel cell response triggered by centromere destabilization. It involves centromeric accumulation of the Cajal body-associated coilin and fibrillarin as well as the survival motor neuron proteins. The response, which we have termed interphase centromere damage response (iCDR), was observed in all tested human and mouse cells, indicative of a conserved mechanism. Knockdown cells for several constitutive centromere proteins have shown that the loss of centromeric protein B provokes the centromeric accumulation of coilin. We propose that the iCDR is part of a novel safeguard mechanism that is dedicated to maintaining interphase centromeres compatible with the correct assembly of kinetochores, microtubule binding, and completion of mitosis.