Hydralazine once daily in hypertension.

The effects of hydralazine formulation and dose interval were assessed in 20 patients with hypertension well controlled on conventional hydralazine tablets, 100 mg twice daily, in addition to atenolol and a diuretic. The double-blind study used four regimens crossed over in random order at five-week intervals; placebo; conventional hydralazine 100 mg twice daily; conventional hydralazine 200 mg once daily; and slow-release hydralazine 200 mg once daily. Blood pressure and pulse rate were assessed soon after (2.5 +/- 0.9 h) and immediately before taking hydralazine (previous dose: once daily, 26.5 +/- 0.9 h; twice daily, 13.6 +/- 2.0 h). Seventeen patients completed the study. All hydralazine regimens were associated with significant falls in blood pressure. Once-daily treatment with conventional hydralazine was unsatisfactory, as its hypotensive effect waned at 24 h; there was a significant difference between the peak and trough effects on blood pressure and pulse in rapid acetylators. Compared with placebo twice-daily conventional hydralazine and once-daily slow-release hydralazine gave satisfactory control for 24 hours in both rapid and slow acetylators, though the hypotensive effect was larger in the slow acetylators. It is concluded that there is no need to administer hydralazine more than twice daily.     

Hydralazine,antinuclear antibodies,and the lupus syndrome.

The incidence of patients with positive antinuclear antibody test results rose during three years of treatment with hydralazine. At the end of that period over half of the patients (both rapid and slow acetylators) had titres exceeding 1/20, but the rate of rise was faster in the slow acetylators than in the rapid. There was a significant relation between the cumulative dose of hydralazine and the proportion of patients found to have antinuclear factors. Fewer black patients had positive test results than white. Patients whose antinuclear antibody test results changed fron negative to positive during the study showed this change five to 26 months after beginning treatment. Some patients showed a substantial fall in antinuclear antibody titre even though hydralazine was continued. From these findings patients in whom test results for antinuclear antibody became positive during treatment with hydralazine need not have the drug stopped unless they have clinical features of the lupus syndrome.     

Phase II clinical study of high-dose toremifene in patients with advanced breast cancer

Thirteen postmenopausal women with advanced local or metastatic breast cancer were treated with the antiestrogen toremifene at a daily dose of 200 mg. All patients had failed previous treatment with different types of endocrine therapy and/or cytotoxic drugs. Objective response was only seen in one patient. Treatment was usually well tolerated but in three cases the drug had to be withdrawn due to side effects.     

Comparison of chloroquine,pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine,and chlorproguanil and dapsone as treatment for falciparum malaria in pregnant and non-pregnant women,Kakamega District,Kenya.

OBJECTIVE--To compare treatment and protection against falciparum malaria in pregnant and non-pregnant women with three drug regimens. DESIGN--Prospective intervention study with six weeks'' follow up. Patients received one of three drug regimens in order of entry. SETTING--Primary care hospital and secondary girls'' school in rural western Kenya. PATIENTS--158 of 988 pregnant women (89 primigravid and 69 multigravid) in the third trimester and 105 of 1488 non-pregnant schoolgirls of reproductive age were parasitaemic (more than 500 asexual forms/microliter. These women were divided into three treatment groups by gravid state. INTERVENTIONS--Women were treated with chloroquine base 25 mg/kg over three days or pyrimethamine 75 mg and sulfadoxine 1500 mg as a single dose or chlorproguanil 1.2 mg/kg and dapsone 2.4 mg/kg as a single dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Parasitaemia and haemoglobin concentrations measured at seven day intervals for six weeks. RESULTS--Primigravid women were more likely to be parasitaemic on follow up than multigravidas or nulligravidas, whose response was about the same. Parasites did not clear by day 7 in primigravidas in six (20%) of 30 who received chloroquine, three (8%) of 35 treated with pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine, and none of 23 treated with chlorproguanil and dapsone. At day 28, 83%, 19%, and 67% of primigravidas in these treatment groups were parasitaemic. Haemoglobin concentrations rose in all women, but improvement was sustained only in women who remained free of parasites. CONCLUSIONS--Clearance of parasites was better with either pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine or chlorproguanil and dapsone than with chloroquine. Longest protection was obtained with pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine.     

4-Hydroxyandrostenedione treatment for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer

We have treated 128 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer with 4-hydroxyandrostenedione. Of these, 118 were assessable for toxicity and 100 for response to treatment. Response to therapy was seen in 34% of patients and stabilization of disease in 12 patients. Three dose regimens were used (500 mg intramuscularly weekly; 250 mg intramuscularly every 2 weeks; and 500 mg orally daily). There was no difference in response in these three groups. Side effects were minimal and local reaction to injected drug was seen in 13% of patients. The sole severe side effect observed was neutropenia which was transient and reversible on discontinuing therapy. 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione is an effective nontoxic agent in the treatment of breast cancer.     

伊曲康唑序贯疗法治疗老年MODS患者侵袭性肺部真菌感染14例

目的 观察伊曲康唑序贯疗法治疗老年多脏器功能障碍综合征（MODS）患者侵袭性肺部真菌感染的疗效。方法 回顾分析重症监护病房（ICU）中,老年MODS患者侵袭性真菌感染14例,最初应用伊曲康唑注射液7～14d,第1～2d,200mg,1次／12h,第3～14d,200mg,1次／d;然后,采用伊曲康唑胶囊或口服液序贯治疗,400mg／d剂量水平,疗程2—4周。结果 临床有效率85．7％,真菌清除率为92．9％,真菌清除平均天数为6．1d;患者28d生存率85．7％,不良反应发生率为42．9％。结论 对老年MODS合并侵袭性真菌感染患者在综合治疗的基础上,应用广谱抗真菌药物——伊曲康唑序贯疗法,是巩固疗效,防止复发值得推广的给药方式。临床应用伊曲康唑时,应注意适应证、药物不良反应及药物的相互作用。     

Use of oral corticosteroids in the community and the prevention of secondary osteoporosis: a cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the prevalence of continuous use of oral steroids in the general population, the conditions for which they are prescribed, and the extent to which patients taking oral steroids are taking treatment to prevent osteoporosis. DESIGN--A cross sectional study with a four year retrospective review of drug treatment. SETTING--Eight large general practices in central and southern Nottinghamshire. SUBJECTS--A population of 65,786 patients (52% women) registered with a general practitioner during 1995. RESULTS--303 patients (65% (197) women) aged 12-94 years were currently taking "continuous" (for at least three months) oral corticosteroid treatment. This figure represents 0.5% of the total population and 1.4% (245/17 114) of patients aged 55 years or more (1.7% (166/9601) of women). The usual steroid was prednisolone (97% (294/303)), the mean dose was 8.0 mg/day, and the median duration of oral steroid treatment determined in 149 patients was three years. The most common conditions for which continuous oral steroids were prescribed were rheumatoid arthritis (23% (70)), polymyalgia rheumatica (22% (66)), and asthma or chronic obstructive airways disease (19% (59)). Only 41 (14%) of the 303 patients taking oral steroids had received treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis over the past four years. Although 37 of the 41 patients were women, only 10% (18/181) of the women over 45 years taking continuous oral corticosteroids were currently taking hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS--If our figures are typical then they suggest that over 250,000 people in the United Kingdom are taking continuous oral steroids and that most of these are taking no prophylaxis against osteoporosis.     

Myoclonus associated with treatment with high doses of morphine: the role of supplemental drugs.

OBJECTIVE--To estimate the prevalence of important side effects in patients with malignant disease who were receiving high doses of morphine as part of their palliative treatment. DESIGN--Data on patients were collected over 12 months. SETTING--Two palliative care units in Western Australia. PATIENTS--19 Patients with malignant disease who were receiving morphine either subcutaneously or orally as the main analgesic. 10 Patients receiving a total daily dose of morphine of at least 500 mg orally or 250 mg parenterally were enrolled in the study. The other 9 patients were enrolled after an important problem thought to be related to the morphine had been identified. All of the patients were taking drugs to supplement the treatment. INTERVENTIONS--The dose of morphine or route of administration, or both, was changed in three patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Determination of the prevalence of side effects in the patients. Assessment of the relation of any side effects with the supplemental drugs taken by the patients. MAIN RESULTS--Plasma morphine and electrolyte concentrations were measured and a full history taken for each patient. Thirteen of the 19 patients had an important side effect; 12 of them had myoclonus and one had hyperalgesia of the skin. Plasma morphine concentrations were similar in patients with and without myoclonus, ranging from 158 to 3465 nmol/l and 39 to 2821 nmol/l respectively. Eight of the patients with side effects were taking an antipsychotic drug concurrently compared with none of those without side effects. A greater proportion of patients with side effects were taking the antinauseant drug thiethylperazine (6/13 v 2/6) and at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (10/13 v 2/6), whereas a smaller proportion were taking a glucocorticosteroid (3/13 v 4/6). The estimated prevalence of important side effects in the total population of patients receiving palliative treatment in the two units was 2.7-3.6%. CONCLUSIONS--Myoclonus as a side effect of treatment with morphine is more likely to occur in patients taking antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs as antiemetics or as adjuvant agents or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for additional analgesia. If a patient develops myoclonus the best approach may be to change the supplemental treatment.     

Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom

A randomised double blind parallel group study was performed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of slow release nifedipine (maximum dose 40 mg twice a day) with those of atenolol (maximum dose 100 mg once a day) as single agents for the treatment of essential hypertension. Of 410 patients recruited almost exclusively from general practices in 22 centres in the United Kingdom 210 received nifedipine and 200 atenolol. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, and control—a reduction of the diastolic pressure to less than 95 mm Hg—was obtained in about 65% of patients. Those who received nifedipine had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressure than those who received atenolol. One hundred and forty nine patients who failed to respond adequately to either atenolol or nifedipine in low doses were given both drugs once daily for eight weeks in a fixed combination capsule that contained atenolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg. All patients showed further reductions in blood pressure, although those who were taking β atenolol before the combination capsule had more pronounced reductions in systolic pressures. Twenty six patients (12%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects while taking nifedipine compared with 19 (10%) taking atenolol. Flushing and oedema were more common after the calcium antagonist, whereas diarrhoea and dyspepsia were more common after atenolol. The frequencies of headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and dyspnoea were equally distributed between the two groups. When the fixed combination capsule was taken side effects such as flushing and oedema continued.Nifedipine was more effective than atenolol in lowering systolic blood pressure, although neither drug used alone controlled the pressure of more than two thirds of the patients studied. When used in a fixed combination slightly better control of blood pressure was achieved with a lower dose of each drug.     

Prevention of gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: controlled trial of ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients requiring one of the following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: naproxen, piroxicam, diclofenac, and indomethacin. In addition, risk factors were studied in order to help in targeting of such treatment to specific groups of patients. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, parallel group with endoscopic assessments at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. SETTING: Multicentre outpatient study at secondary referral centres in five European countries. PATIENTS--297 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis over the age of 18 without lesions in the stomach and duodenum at baseline endoscopy (after one week without taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Those taking other antirheumatic agents, concomitant ulcerogenic drugs, or treatment for peptic ulcers within the previous 30 days were excluded. Age, sex, arthritic disease, and type of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used were comparable in the two treatment groups. In all, 263 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo (plus the selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was prescribed within five days after the baseline endoscopy for two consecutive periods of four weeks. Paracetamol was permitted during the study, but not antacids. Patients were withdrawn if the most severe grade of damage (including ulceration) was found at the four week endoscopy or when indicated, or with lesser damage at the investigator''s discretion. END POINT: Frequency of gastric and duodenal ulceration or lesions, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of peptic ulceration by eight weeks was 10.3% (27/263); 2 out of 135 (1.5%) developed duodenal ulceration in the ranitidine group, compared with 10 out of 126 (8%) taking placebo. The frequency of gastric ulceration was the same (6%) for the two groups at eight weeks. Though significantly fewer gastric lesions developed in the ranitidine group by eight weeks. The frequency of non-ulcerative lesions in the duodenum did not differ greatly for the two groups at either time point. Twelve out of 75 (16%) patients taking piroxicam developed peptic ulceration, of whom two thirds had duodenal ulceration. Patients with a history of peptic ulcer were particularly susceptible to recurrent ulceration, against which ranitidine offered some protection. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the incidence of duodenal ulceration but not gastric ulceration when prescribed concomitantly with one of four commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Effects of low dose ramipril on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and raised excretion of urinary albumin: randomised,double blind,placebo controlled trial (the DIABHYCAR study)

Objective To investigate whether a low dose of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril lowers cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes who have microalbuminuria or proteinuria.Design Randomised, double blind, parallel group trial comparing ramipril (1.25 mg/day) with placebo (on top of usual treatment) for cardiovascular and renal outcomes for at least three years.Setting Multicentre, primary care study conducted mostly by general practitioners in 16 European and north African countries.Participants 4912 patients with type 2 diabetes aged >50 years who use oral antidiabetic drugs and have persistent microalbuminuria or proteinuria (urinary albumin excretion ≥ 20 mg/l in two consecutive samples), and serum creatinine ≤ 150 μmol/l.Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure leading to hospital admission, and end stage renal failure.Results Participants were followed for 3 to 6 (median 4) years. There were 362 primary events among the 2443 participants taking ramipril (37.8 per 1000 patient years) and 377 events among the 2469 participants taking placebo (38.8 per 1000 patient years; hazard ratio 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.20, P = 0.65)). None of the components of the primary outcome was reduced. Ramipril lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures (by 2.43 and 1.06 mm Hg respectively after two years) and favoured regression from microalbuminuria (20-200 mg/l) or proteinuria (> 200mg/l) to normal level (< 20 mg/l) or microalbuminuria (P < 0.07) in 1868 participants who completed the study.Conclusions Low dose (1.25 mg) ramipril once daily has no effect on cardiovascular and renal outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, despite a slight decrease in blood pressure and urinary albumin. The cardiovascular benefits of a daily higher dose (10 mg) ramipril observed elsewhere are not found with an eightfold lower daily dose.     

Albendazole chemotherapy for treatment of diarrhoea in patients with AIDS in Zambia: a randomised double blind controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the value of short course, high dose albendazole chemotherapy in the treatment of persistent diarrhoea related to HIV in unselected patients in urban Zambia. DESIGN--A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of albendazole 800 mg twice daily for two weeks. Patients were monitored intensively for one month and followed for up to six months. SETTING--Home care. AIDS services in Lusaka and Ndola. PATIENTS--174 HIV seropositive patients with persistent diarrhoea (defined as loose but not bloody stools three or more times a day for three weeks or longer). No investigations were undertaken except HIV testing after counselling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Proportion of time periods during which diarrhoea was experienced after completion of treatment; proportion of patients with full remission after completion of treatment; mortality. RESULTS--The patients taking albendazole had diarrhoea on 29% fewer days than those taking placebo (P < 0.0001) in the two weeks after treatment. The benefit of albendazole was maintained over six months. In patients with a Karnofsky score of 50 to 70 (needing help with activities of daily living and unable to work, but not needing admission to hospital) diarrhoea was reduced by 50%. Remission was obtained in 26% of all patients who received albendazole (P = 0.004 against 9% receiving placebo), and this difference was maintained over six months (log rank test, P = 0.003). Albendazole had no effect on mortality. Minimal adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS--For HIV infected Zambians with diarrhoea of more than three weeks'' duration albendazole offers substantial relief from symptoms and may be used empirically, without prior investigation.     

米菲司酮不同剂量治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察

目的观察米菲司酮不同给药剂量治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。方法将子宫肌瘤患者分成两组,A组25例,每天服用米菲司酮25mg,B组21例,每天服用米菲司酮10mg,均从月经第一天开始服用,连续三个月。治疗期间每月复查肝、肾功能,治疗开始和结束分别测量子宫和子宫肌瘤的体积和内膜厚度。结果A组肌瘤体积缩小了42.58%(P<0.01),B组肌瘤缩小了41.55%(P<0.01),两者之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。而两组的药物副作用也无显著差别。结论每日口服米菲司酮10mg可以有效的缩小子宫肌瘤,副作用小。     

Influence of adrenergic nervous and prostaglandin systems on hydralazine-induced renin release

The role of the beta-adrenergic nervous and prostaglandin systems in vasodilator-induced activation of the renin-angiotensin system was studied in conscious rats. The plasma renin activity (PRA) response to intravenous hydralazine (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg body wt.) was compared to the PRA response following administration of similar doses of hydralazine to rats pretreated with either indomethacin (3 mg/kg body wt. i.v.) or indomethacin and propranolol (1 mg/kg body wt. i.v.). PRA increased significantly above control levels after each of the hydralazine doses. In rats pretreated with indomethacin, PRA did not increase with the 0.25 mg/kg dose of hydralazine; increased significantly with the 0.5 mg/kg dose but remained significantly lower than the PRA response in the absence of indomethacin; and increased with the 1 mg/kg dose to a level not significantly different from PRA in rats receiving only hydralazine. When rats were pretreated with indomethacin and propranolol, PRA did not increase significantly in response to either the 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg doses of hydralazine. Although a statistically significant increase in PRA was noted with the 1 mg/kg dose of hydralazine, the level of PRA achieved was very low and only 15% of that observed with the other two treatment regimens (i.e., hydralazine alone or indomethacin and hydralazine). These results demonstrate that vasodilator-induced renin release is only partially mediated via the prostaglandin system, that the degree of this control is related to the intensity of vasodilator stimulus and that renin release following administration of hydralazine can be attributed almost entirely to activation of the beta-adrenergic nervous and prostaglandin systems.     

Sensitivity to Rifampicin: Incidence,Mechanism, and Prevention

Five out of 200 patients taking rifampicin 900 mg twice weekly and three out of 91 patients taking rifampicin who attended an immunology clinic developed intolerance to the drug. Antibodies to rifampicin, which were found in most cases, decreased steadily after the end of treatment but were detectable for up to 16 months. The dose of rifampicin and the blood levels are predominating factors in the occurrence of reactions. Thus the dose should be reduced in patients in whom rifampicin blood levels rise abnormally. When it is important to continue rifampicin treatment despite intolerance antibody titres within 24 hours after administration of the drug must be measured to find when they are lowest, which determines the “unreactive period,” and when a further dose may be safely given.     

The Effect of Phenothiazines on the Electrocardiogram

Thioridazine, chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine were administered to six psychiatric patients. Each was used in four dosage levels (thioridazine and chlorpromazine: 200, 400, 800 and 1200 mg. daily; trifluoperazine: 8, 16, 32, 64 mg. daily); and each increase in dosage was effected after four days of drug administration.Before the trial, twice during each drug period and before commencement of the next dose regimen, an electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded. The findings indicated that thioridazine modifies the terminal portion (S-T segment, T and U waves) of the human ECG. A similar change occurred in three of six subjects while taking chlorpromazine and in one of six while taking trifluoperazine. Thioridazine induced changes in all six subjects studied, viz., blunting and notching of T waves with or without prolongation of QT interval. In some the notching produced a doublehump appearance in which a T wave of reduced voltage formed the proximal hump and a positive U wave of increased voltage formed the distal hump.Thioridazine-induced alterations in the ECG have been described as resembling those caused by quinidine; they also resemble changes associated with hypokalemia.     

阴道乳杆菌胶囊对产后6周妇女特异性阴道炎防治作用的临床探讨

目的探讨微生物制剂（阴道乳杆菌胶囊）对产后6周妇女特异性阴道炎（细菌性阴道病、滴虫性阴道炎、外阴阴道念珠菌病）的防治作用。方法采用前瞻性研究方法。自2009年6月至2011年8月先后收集895例产后6周特异性阴道炎妇女,包括细菌性阴道病535例、外阴阴道念珠菌病339例和滴虫性阴道炎21例,随机分成三组,第一组（n=200）阴道局部用乳杆菌胶囊（定君生）250 mg/d,连用10 d;第二组（n=200）阴道局部用抗菌药（细菌性阴道病或滴虫性阴道炎：甲硝唑栓500 mg/d,外阴阴道念珠菌病：克霉唑栓150 mg/d,连用10 d）;第三组（n=200）阴道局部用抗菌药＋乳杆菌胶囊（细菌性阴道病或滴虫性阴道炎：甲硝唑栓500 mg/d＋定君生250 mg/d,外阴阴道念珠菌病：克霉唑栓150 mg/d＋定君生250mg/d,连用10 d）,三组均于停药1周后复查阴道分泌物以了解疗效,以及产后3、6、9、12个月分别复查阴道分泌物,以了解三组产后1年内阴道pH、乳杆菌数量变化情况及阴道炎复发率情况。结果 600例产后6周特异性阴道炎妇女中,单用定君生治疗组总有效率为76.5%;用甲硝唑栓或克霉唑栓治疗组总有效率为77.5%;两组总疗效比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。用抗菌药（甲硝唑栓或克霉唑栓）＋定君生治疗组总有效率为95.0%,与前两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。应用定君生治疗两组1年内阴道pH明显降低,阴道乳酸杆菌数量明显增多,以＋＋＋~＋＋＋＋比例为主,且追踪1年阴道炎的发生率均明显降低,与只用抗生素治疗组相比差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论阴道乳杆菌胶囊（定君生）是治疗特异性阴道炎的有效药物,与传统抗生素相比疗效差异无统计学意义,且定君生联合抗生素治疗特异性阴道炎,疗效更为显著,这不失为一个新的治疗途径。产后6周妇女特异性阴道炎选用微生态制剂（阴道乳?     

Randomised controlled trial of aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies)

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with low dose aspirin and heparin leads to a higher rate of live births than that achieved with low dose aspirin alone in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies), lupus anticoagulant, and cardiolipin antibodies (or anticardiolipin antibodies). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Specialist clinic for recurrent miscarriages. SUBJECTS: 90 women (median age 33 (range 22-43)) with a history of recurrent miscarriage (median number 4 (range 3-15)) and persistently positive results for phospholipid antibodies. INTERVENTION: Either low dose aspirin (75 mg daily) or low dose aspirin and 5000 U of unfractionated heparin subcutaneously 12 hourly. All women started treatment with low dose aspirin when they had a positive urine pregnancy test. Women were randomly allocated an intervention when fetal heart activity was seen on ultrasonography. Treatment was stopped at the time of miscarriage or at 34 weeks'' gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of live births with the two treatments. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the two groups in age or the number and gestation of previous miscarriages. The rate of live births with low dose aspirin and heparin was 71% (32/45 pregnancies) and 42% (19/45 pregnancies) with low dose aspirin alone (odds ratio 3.37 (95% confidence interval 1.40 to 8.10)). More than 90% of miscarriages occurred in the first trimester. There was no difference in outcome between the two treatments in pregnancies that advanced beyond 13 weeks'' gestation. Twelve of the 51 successful pregnancies (24%) were delivered before 37 weeks'' gestation. Women randomly allocated aspirin and heparin had a median decrease in lumbar spine bone density of 5.4% (range -8.6% to 1.7%). CONCLUSION: Treatment with aspirin and heparin leads to a significantly higher rate of live births in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies than that achieved with aspirin alone.     

Potentially Serious Side Effects of High-dose Twice-weekly Rifampicin

Daily rifampicin in a single dose of 600 mg, combined with other drugs, usually streptomycin and isoniazid, was given to 49 patients for three months. It was planned to continue for another 15 months with twice-weekly rifampicin 1,200 mg plus isoniazid 900 mg, but the high incidence of side effects led to cessation of the intermittent regimen when only two patients had completed 18 months.Though there was no serious problem with daily treatment 11 patients (22%) were unable to continue rifampicin on the intermittent regimen. In 8 (16%) a pyrexial syndrome occurred. In one of these patients there was also temporary renal failure, and in another precipitous thrombocytopenia led to epistaxis and bleeding into the tongue and lips. Symptomless thrombocytopenia developed in two other patients, making three cases (6%) of thrombocytopenia in all.In 16 (33%) of the 49 patients antibodies to rifampicin were detected in the blood. Side effects occurred in 9 (56%) of these, including the three developing thrombocytopenia, but in only 2 (6%) of the 33 patients with no antibodies detected. This association of toxic reactions with antibodies is highly significant (P<0·001).     

Effect of ACE inhibitors on proteinuria and renal functioning in primary glomerulopathies]

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors was given to 16 patients with glomerular nephritis in whom a complete remission of nephrotic syndrome could not be achieved with immunosuppressive-anti-inflammatory therapy. Captopril in the daily dose of 25-75 mg and enalapril in the daily dose of 10 mg were administered for 1-36 months (mean 12.6 months). Daily proteinuria decreased by 40-80% comparing with baseline value in 2/3 of patients. Total protein and albumin serum levels increased simultaneously. No changes in blood creatinine were noted in patients with initially normal renal functioning except one patient. Renal functioning was stable in 50% of patients with increased blood creatinine levels (mean 200 mumol/L). Blood creatinine was increasing in the remaining patients.