共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Jenny Erales Sabrina Lignon Brigitte Gontero 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12735-12744
A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein,
mainly known for its redox function with A4
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized
CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of
GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not
redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins,
such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do
not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific
chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol
dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is
necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S
that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection.
Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is
partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation.
Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of
GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox
function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein”
for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This
new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving
A2B2 GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal
extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be
redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most
photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria
(1,
2), higher plants
(3), the diatom
Asterionella formosa
(4,
5), and green
(1) and red algae
(6). It allows the formation of
a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH),3 two key
enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with
fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway
(7). The
phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively
studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
(8,
9) and in Arabidopsis
thaliana (10,
11). In the green alga C.
reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong
(8). GAPDH may exist as a
homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A4) in higher plants,
cyanobacteria, and green and red algae
(6,
12), but in higher plants, it
can also exist as a heterotetramer (A2B2), composed of
two subunits, GapA and GapB
(13,
14). GapB, up to now, has
exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two
prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus
lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas
CP12 is missing (15).
The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension
containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues
(16). Thus, although the
A4 GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues
(13,
14,
17–20),
they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C
terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB
subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12,
as is well documented in the literature
(1,
8,
11,
16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs)
(21–26).
The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few
secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high
flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors
(27,
28). They are often able to
bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions
(29,
30). Recently, some IUPs have
been described in photosynthetic organisms
(31,
32).There are many functional categories of IUPs
(22,
33). They can be, for
instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role,
neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming
complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner
molecule (33). These functions
are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating
its redox properties (8,
34,
35), and can also bind a metal
ion (36,
37). IUPs can also bind
transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a
chaperone activity (31,
38). This chaperone function
was first shown for α-synuclein
(39) and for α-casein
(40), which are fully
disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those
of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become
insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was
resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH,
if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known
for its tendency to aggregate
(41–44)
and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies
(45,
46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their
protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions
(47,
48), CP12 forms a stable
complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the
protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12
(35). However, only a
site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction
site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the
residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site
(49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with
mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its
association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize
a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map
the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve
site-directed mutagenesis. 相似文献
2.
Lilly Y. W. Bourguignon Weiliang Xia Gabriel Wong 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(5):2657-2671
3.
4.
Maika Deffieu Ingrid Bhatia-Ki??ová Bénédicte Salin Anne Galinier Stéphen Manon Nadine Camougrand 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):14828-14837
The antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine prevented the
autophagy-dependent delivery of mitochondria to the vacuoles, as examined by
fluorescence microscopy of mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent protein,
transmission electron microscopy, and Western blot analysis of mitochondrial
proteins. The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was specific
to mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy). Indeed, autophagy-dependent activation
of alkaline phosphatase and the presence of hallmarks of non-selective
microautophagy were not altered by N-acetyl-l-cysteine.
The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was not related to its
scavenging properties, but rather to its fueling effect of the glutathione
pool. As a matter of fact, the decrease of the glutathione pool induced by
chemical or genetical manipulation did stimulate mitophagy but not general
autophagy. Conversely, the addition of a cell-permeable form of glutathione
inhibited mitophagy. Inhibition of glutathione synthesis had no effect in the
strain Δuth1, which is deficient in selective mitochondrial
degradation. These data show that mitophagy can be regulated independently of
general autophagy, and that its implementation may depend on the cellular
redox status.Autophagy is a major pathway for the lysosomal/vacuolar delivery of
long-lived proteins and organelles, where they are degraded and recycled.
Autophagy plays a crucial role in differentiation and cellular response to
stress and is conserved in eukaryotic cells from yeast to mammals
(1,
2). The main form of autophagy,
macroautophagy, involves the non-selective sequestration of large portions of
the cytoplasm into double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes, and their
delivery to the vacuole/lysosome for degradation. Another process,
microautophagy, involves the direct sequestration of parts of the cytoplasm by
vacuole/lysosomes. The two processes coexist in yeast cells but their extent
may depend on different factors including metabolic state: for example, we
have observed that nitrogen-starved lactate-grown yeast cells develop
microautophagy, whereas nitrogen-starved glucose-grown cells preferentially
develop macroautophagy (3).Both macroautophagy and microautophagy are essentially non-selective, in
the way that autophagosomes and vacuole invaginations do not appear to
discriminate the sequestered material. However, selective forms of autophagy
have been observed (4) that
target namely peroxisomes (5,
6), chromatin
(7,
8), endoplasmic reticulum
(9), ribosomes
(10), and mitochondria
(3,
11–13).
Although non-selective autophagy plays an essential role in survival by
nitrogen starvation, by providing amino acids to the cell, selective autophagy
is more likely to have a function in the maintenance of cellular structures,
both under normal conditions as a “housecleaning” process, and
under stress conditions by eliminating altered organelles and macromolecular
structures
(14–16).
Selective autophagy targeting mitochondria, termed mitophagy, may be
particularly relevant to stress conditions. The mitochondrial respiratory
chain is both the main site and target of
ROS4 production
(17). Consequently, the
maintenance of a pool of healthy mitochondria is a crucial challenge for the
cells. The progressive accumulation of altered mitochondria
(18) caused by the loss of
efficiency of the maintenance process (degradation/biogenesis de
novo) is often considered as a major cause of cellular aging
(19–23).
In mammalian cells, autophagic removal of mitochondria has been shown to be
triggered following induction/blockade of apoptosis
(23), suggesting that
autophagy of mitochondria was required for cell survival following
mitochondria injury (14).
Consistent with this idea, a direct alteration of mitochondrial permeability
properties has been shown to induce mitochondrial autophagy
(13,
24,
25). Furthermore, inactivation
of catalase induced the autophagic elimination of altered mitochondria
(26). In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the alteration of
F0F1-ATPase biogenesis in a conditional mutant has been
shown to trigger autophagy
(27). Alterations of
mitochondrial ion homeostasis caused by the inactivation of the
K+/H+ exchanger was shown to cause both autophagy and
mitophagy (28). We have
reported that treatment of cells with rapamycin induced early ROS production
and mitochondrial lipid oxidation that could be inhibited by the hydrophobic
antioxidant resveratrol (29).
Furthermore, resveratrol treatment impaired autophagic degradation of both
cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins and delayed rapamycin-induced cell death,
suggesting that mitochondrial oxidation events may play a crucial role in the
regulation of autophagy. This existence of regulation of autophagy by ROS has
received molecular support in HeLa cells
(30): these authors showed
that starvation stimulated ROS production, namely H2O2,
which was essential for autophagy. Furthermore, they identified the cysteine
protease hsAtg4 as a direct target for oxidation by
H2O2. This provided a possible connection between the
mitochondrial status and regulation of autophagy.Investigations of mitochondrial autophagy in nitrogen-starved lactate-grown
yeast cells have established the existence of two distinct processes: the
first one occurring very early, is selective for mitochondria and is dependent
on the presence of the mitochondrial protein Uth1p; the second one occurring
later, is not selective for mitochondria, is not dependent on Uth1p, and is a
form of bulk microautophagy
(3). The absence of the
selective process in the Δuth1 mutant strongly delays and
decreases mitochondrial protein degradation
(3,
12). The putative protein
phosphatase Aup1p has been also shown to be essential in inducing mitophagy
(31). Additionally several Atg
proteins were shown to be involved in vacuolar sequestration of mitochondrial
GFP (3,
12,
32,
33). Recently, the protein
Atg11p, which had been already identified as an essential protein for
selective autophagy has also been reported as being essential for mitophagy
(33).The question remains as to identify of the signals that trigger selective
mitophagy. It is particularly intriguing that selective mitophagy is activated
very early after the shift to a nitrogen-deprived medium
(3). Furthermore, selective
mitophagy is very active on lactate-grown cells (with fully differentiated
mitochondria) but is nearly absent in glucose-grown cells
(3). In the present paper, we
investigated the relationships between the redox status of the cells and
selective mitophagy, namely by manipulating glutathione. Our results support
the view that redox imbalance is a trigger for the selective elimination of
mitochondria. 相似文献
5.
6.
Christian Rosker Gargi Meur Emily J. A. Taylor Colin W. Taylor 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(8):5186-5194
Ryanodine receptors (RyR) are Ca2+ channels that mediate
Ca2+ release from intracellular stores in response to diverse
intracellular signals. In RINm5F insulinoma cells, caffeine, and
4-chloro-m-cresol (4CmC), agonists of RyR, stimulated Ca2+
entry that was independent of store-operated Ca2+ entry, and
blocked by prior incubation with a concentration of ryanodine that inactivates
RyR. Patch-clamp recording identified small numbers of large-conductance
(γK = 169 pS) cation channels that were activated by
caffeine, 4CmC or low concentrations of ryanodine. Similar channels were
detected in rat pancreatic β-cells. In RINm5F cells, the channels were
blocked by cytosolic, but not extracellular, ruthenium red. Subcellular
fractionation showed that type 3 IP3 receptors (IP3R3)
were expressed predominantly in endoplasmic reticulum, whereas RyR2 were
present also in plasma membrane fractions. Using RNAi selectively to reduce
expression of RyR1, RyR2, or IP3R3, we showed that RyR2 mediates
both the Ca2+ entry and the plasma membrane currents evoked by
agonists of RyR. We conclude that small numbers of RyR2 are selectively
expressed in the plasma membrane of RINm5F pancreatic β-cells, where they
mediate Ca2+ entry.Ryanodine receptors
(RyR)3 and inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3R)
(1,
2) are the archetypal
intracellular Ca2+ channels. Both are widely expressed, although
RyR are more restricted in their expression than IP3R
(3,
4). In common with many cells,
pancreatic β-cells and insulin-secreting cell lines express both
IP3R (predominantly IP3R3)
(5,
6) and RyR (predominantly RyR2)
(7). Both RyR and
IP3R are expressed mostly within membranes of the endoplasmic (ER),
where they mediate release of Ca2+. Functional RyR are also
expressed in the secretory vesicles
(8,
9) or, and perhaps more likely,
in the endosomes of β-cells
(10). Despite earlier
suggestions (11),
IP3R are probably not present in the secretory vesicles of
β-cells (8,
12,
13).All three subtypes of IP3R are stimulated by IP3 with
Ca2+ (1), and the
three subtypes of RyR are each directly regulated by Ca2+. However,
RyR differ in whether their most important physiological stimulus is
depolarization of the plasma membrane (RyR1), Ca2+ (RyR2) or
additional intracellular messengers like cyclic ADP-ribose. The latter
stimulates both Ca2+ release and insulin secretion in β-cells
(8,
14). The activities of both
families of intracellular Ca2+ channels are also modulated by many
additional signals that act directly or via phosphorylation
(15,
16). Although they commonly
mediate release of Ca2+ from the ER, both IP3R and RyR
select rather poorly between Ca2+ and other cations (permeability
ratio, PCa/PK ∼7)
(1,
17). This may allow
electrogenic Ca2+ release from the ER to be rapidly compensated by
uptake of K+ (18),
and where RyR or IP3R are expressed in other membranes it may allow
them to affect membrane potential.Both Ca2+ entry and release of Ca2+ from
intracellular stores contribute to the oscillatory increases in cytosolic
Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) that
stimulate exocytosis of insulin-containing vesicles in pancreatic β-cells
(7). Glucose rapidly
equilibrates across the plasma membrane (PM) of β-cells and its oxidative
metabolism by mitochondria increases the cytosolic ATP/ADP ratio, causing
KATP channels to close
(19). This allows an
unidentified leak current to depolarize the PM
(20) and activate
voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, predominantly L-type Ca2+
channels (21). The resulting
Ca2+ entry is amplified by Ca2+-induced Ca2+
release from intracellular stores
(7), triggering exocytotic
release of insulin-containing dense-core vesicles
(22). The importance of this
sequence is clear from the widespread use of sulfonylurea drugs, which close
KATP channels, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Ca2+
uptake by mitochondria beneath the PM further stimulates ATP production,
amplifying the initial response to glucose and perhaps thereby contributing to
the sustained phase of insulin release
(23). However, neither the
increase in [Ca2+]i nor the insulin release
evoked by glucose or other nutrients is entirely dependent on Ca2+
entry (7,
24) or closure of
KATP channels (25).
This suggests that glucose metabolism may also more directly activate RyR
(7,
26) and/or IP3R
(27) to cause release of
Ca2+ from intracellular stores. A change in the ATP/ADP ratio is
one means whereby nutrient metabolism may be linked to opening of
intracellular Ca2+ channels because both RyR
(28) and IP3R
(1) are stimulated by ATP.The other major physiological regulators of insulin release are the
incretins: glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic
hormone (29). These hormones,
released by cells in the small intestine, stimulate synthesis of cAMP in
β-cells and thereby potentiate glucose-evoked insulin release
(30). These pathways are also
targets of drugs used successfully to treat type 2 diabetes
(29). The responses of
β-cells to cAMP involve both cAMP-dependent protein kinase and epacs
(exchange factors activated by cAMP)
(31,
32). The effects of the latter
are, at least partly, due to release of Ca2+ from intracellular
stores via RyR
(33–35)
and perhaps also via IP3R
(36). The interplays between
Ca2+ and cAMP signaling generate oscillatory changes in the
concentrations of both messengers
(37). RyR and IP3R
are thus implicated in mediating responses to each of the major physiological
regulators of insulin secretion: glucose and incretins.Here we report that in addition to expression in intracellular stores,
which probably include both the ER and secretory vesicles and/or endosomes,
functional RyR2 are also expressed in small numbers in the PM of RINm5F
insulinoma cells and rat pancreatic β-cells. 相似文献
7.
8.
Ruben K. Dagda Salvatore J. Cherra III Scott M. Kulich Anurag Tandon David Park Charleen T. Chu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13843-13855
Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease.
Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial
parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is
neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1
function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial
fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the
reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1.
Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased
mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced
autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role
in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines.
Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and
overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response.
The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in
PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins
Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting
oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic
remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function
elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the
autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may
cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial
homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects
∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown,
although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as
1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA),3 and
rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models
(1). Abnormalities in
mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells
and tissues from parkinsonian patients
(2,
3), which also exhibit
increased mitochondrial autophagy
(4). Furthermore, mutations in
parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial
homeostasis (5). Thus,
disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated
in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD
encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)
(6,
7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and
mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that
possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence
(6,
8). The primary sequence also
includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the
PINK1 domain (8), a conserved
kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal
domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity
(9,
10). Overexpression of
wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several
toxic insults in neuronal cells
(6,
11,
12). Mitochondrial targeting
is necessary for some (13) but
not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1
(14), implicating involvement
of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology
(8). PINK1 catalytic activity
is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M
substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to
protect neurons (14). Although
PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated
mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of
neuroprotective activities
(13,
15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically
(3,
16-18)
to prevent oxidative stress
(19,
20) and regulate mitochondrial
morphology (21). Primary cells
derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with
disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells
(3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving
sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs)
for delivery to lysosomes (22,
23). Interestingly,
mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the
PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24,
25). Moreover, mitochondrial
fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative
diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
(4,
26-28).
Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a
random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia,
mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic
substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy)
(29,
30). In particular,
mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models
involving oxidative mitochondrial injury
(25,
31,
32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates
(33-35)
and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology
(36). Chronic disruption of
lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria
with decreased calcium buffering capacity
(37), implicating an important
role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis
(37,
38). Recently, Parkin, which
complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology
(3), was found to promote
autophagy of depolarized mitochondria
(39). Conversely, Beclin
1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD
toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA
(25,
28,
31,
32), causing neurite
retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat
kinase 2 (40). Whereas
properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role,
excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic
stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration
(28).As mitochondrial fragmentation
(3) and increased mitochondrial
autophagy (4) have been
described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or
not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these
observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous
PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and
mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the
opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased
mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate
that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks,
suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy
limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
Denise A. Berti Cain Morano Lilian C. Russo Leandro M. Castro Fernanda M. Cunha Xin Zhang Juan Sironi Cl��cio F. Klitzke Emer S. Ferro Lloyd D. Fricker 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(21):14105-14116
Thimet oligopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.15; EP24.15) is an intracellular enzyme
that has been proposed to metabolize peptides within cells, thereby affecting
antigen presentation and G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction.
However, only a small number of intracellular substrates of EP24.15 have been
reported previously. Here we have identified over 100 peptides in human
embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells that are derived from intracellular
proteins; many but not all of these peptides are substrates or products of
EP24.15. First, cellular peptides were extracted from HEK293 cells and
incubated in vitro with purified EP24.15. Then the peptides were
labeled with isotopic tags and analyzed by mass spectrometry to obtain
quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. A related series of experiments
tested the effect of overexpression of EP24.15 on the cellular levels of
peptides in HEK293 cells. Finally, synthetic peptides that corresponded to 10
of the cellular peptides were incubated with purified EP24.15 in
vitro, and the cleavage was monitored by high pressure liquid
chromatography and mass spectrometry. Many of the EP24.15 substrates
identified by these approaches are 9–11 amino acids in length,
supporting the proposal that EP24.15 can function in the degradation of
peptides that could be used for antigen presentation. However, EP24.15 also
converts some peptides into products that are 8–10 amino acids, thus
contributing to the formation of peptides for antigen presentation. In
addition, the intracellular peptides described here are potential candidates
to regulate protein interactions within cells.Intracellular protein turnover is a crucial step for cell functioning, and
if this process is impaired, the elevated levels of aged proteins usually lead
to the formation of intracellular insoluble aggregates that can cause severe
pathologies (1). In mammalian
cells, most proteins destined for degradation are initially tagged with a
polyubiquitin chain in an energy-dependent process and then digested to small
peptides by the 26 S proteasome, a large proteolytic complex involved in the
regulation of cell division, gene expression, and other key processes
(2,
3). In eukaryotes, 30–90%
of newly synthesized proteins may be degraded by proteasomes within minutes of
synthesis (3,
4). In addition to proteasomes,
other extralysosomal proteolytic systems have been reported
(5,
6). The proteasome cleaves
proteins into peptides that are typically 2–20 amino acids in length
(7). In most cases, these
peptides are thought to be rapidly hydrolyzed into amino acids by
aminopeptidases
(8–10).
However, some intracellular peptides escape complete degradation and are
imported into the endoplasmic reticulum where they associate with major
histocompatibility complex class I
(MHC-I)3 molecules and
traffic to the cell surface for presentation to the immune system
(10–12).
Additionally, based on the fact that free peptides added to the intracellular
milieu can regulate cellular functions mediated by protein interactions such
as gene regulation, metabolism, cell signaling, and protein targeting
(13,
14), intracellular peptides
generated by proteasomes that escape degradation have been suggested to play a
role in regulating protein interactions
(15). Indeed, oligopeptides
isolated from rat brain tissue using the catalytically inactive EP24.15 (EC
3.4.24.15) were introduced into Chinese hamster ovarian-S and HEK293 cells and
were found capable of altering G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction
(16). Moreover, EP24.15
overexpression itself changed both angiotensin II and isoproterenol signal
transduction, suggesting a physiological function for its intracellular
substrates/products (16).EP24.15 is a zinc-dependent peptidase of the metallopeptidase M3 family
that contains the HEXXH motif
(17). This enzyme was first
described as a neuropeptide-degrading enzyme present in the soluble fraction
of brain homogenates (18).
Whereas EP24.15 can be secreted
(19,
20), its predominant location
in the cytosol and nucleus suggests that the primary function of this enzyme
is not the extracellular degradation of neuropeptides and hormones
(21,
22). EP24.15 was shown in
vivo to participate in antigen presentation through MHC-I
(23–25)
and in vitro to bind
(26) or degrade
(27) some MHC-I associated
peptides. EP24.15 has also been shown in vitro to degrade peptides
containing 5–17 amino acids produced after proteasome digestion of
β-casein (28). EP24.15
shows substrate size restriction to peptides containing from 5 to 17 amino
acids because of its catalytic center that is located in a deep channel
(29). Despite the size
restriction, EP24.15 has a broad substrate specificity
(30), probably because a
significant portion of the enzyme-binding site is lined with potentially
flexible loops that allow reorganization of the active site following
substrate binding (29).
Recently, it has also been suggested that certain substrates may be cleaved by
an open form of EP24.15 (31).
This characteristic is supported by the ability of EP24.15 to accommodate
different amino acid residues at subsites S4 to S3′, which even includes
the uncommon post-proline cleavage
(30). Such biochemical and
structural features make EP24.15 a versatile enzyme to degrade structurally
unrelated oligopeptides.Previously, brain peptides that bound to catalytically inactive EP24.15
were isolated and identified using mass spectrometry
(22). The majority of peptides
captured by the inactive enzyme were intracellular protein fragments that
efficiently interacted with EP24.15; the smallest peptide isolated in these
assays contained 5 and the largest 17 amino acids
(15,
16,
22,
32), which is within the size
range previously reported for natural and synthetic substrates of EP24.15
(18,
30,
33,
34). Interestingly, the
peptides released by the proteasome are in the same size range of EP24.15
competitive inhibitors/substrates
(7,
35,
36). Taken altogether, these
data suggest that in the intracellular environment EP24.15 could further
cleave proteasome-generated peptides unrelated to MHC-I antigen presentation
(15).Although the mutated inactive enzyme “capture” assay was
successful in identifying several cellular protein fragments that were
substrates for EP24.15, it also found some interacting peptides that were not
substrates. In this study, we used several approaches to directly screen for
cellular peptides that were cleaved by EP24.15. The first approach involved
the extraction of cellular peptides from the HEK293 cell line, incubation
in vitro with purified EP24.15, labeling with isotopic tags, and
analysis by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of
cleavage. The second approach examined the effect of EP24.15 overexpression on
the cellular levels of peptides in the HEK293 cell line. The third set of
experiments tested synthetic peptides with purified EP24.15 in vitro,
and examined cleavage by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass
spectrometry. Collectively, these studies have identified a large number of
intracellular peptides, including those that likely represent the endogenous
substrates and products of EP24.15, and this original information contributes
to a better understanding of the function of this enzyme in vivo. 相似文献
12.
Tatsuhiro Sato Akio Nakashima Lea Guo Fuyuhiko Tamanoi 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12783-12791
Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway
by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully
reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of
anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low
in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is
dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand,
the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from
mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1
is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42
did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition,
the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that
the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a
recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the
Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation
of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of
Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein
4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that
competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation
of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated
by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results
suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to
regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins
(1). We have shown that Rheb
proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human
(2). Although yeast and fruit
fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or
simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1)
(2). Structurally, these
proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the
function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide
binding (1,
3,
4). Rheb proteins have a
conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras
(1). The effector domain
required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and
its adjacent sequences (1,
5). Structural analysis by
x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to
solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues
35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange
(6). In addition, all Rheb
proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino
acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals
farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins
are farnesylated
(7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling
pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in
response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions
(10–14).
Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a
GTPase-activating protein for Rheb
(15–19).
Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional
domain for the down-regulation of Rheb
(20). Mutations in the
Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms
include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts
of the body as well as neurological symptoms
(21,
22). Overexpression of Rheb
results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients
(15,
16). Two mTOR complexes,
mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified
(23,
24). Whereas mTORC1 is
involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is
involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been
suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2
(25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism
of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a
model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex
(26–28).
Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was
reported (29). Rheb has been
shown to interact with mTOR
(27,
30), and this may involve
direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR
(27). However, this Rheb/mTOR
interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP
bound to Rheb (27,
28). Recently, a different
model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein
38) mediates the activation of
mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed
(31,
32). In this model, FKBP38
binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative
regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent
reports dispute this idea
(33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in
vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of
recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved
cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity
against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb.
Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on
the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not
detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is
not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study
revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1
rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
S��bastien Thomas Brigitte Ritter David Verbich Claire Sanson Lyne Bourbonni��re R. Anne McKinney Peter S. McPherson 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):12410-12419
Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein
functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal
cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates,
alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long
(intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine
nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is
expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from
neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus,
intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons,
including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is
localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with
some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled
axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV
recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and
adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces
the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with
F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation
during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an
important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but
that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis
(CME)4 is a
major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels
of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate
the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades
(1-5).
In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important
process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and
recycling of SV membranes (6,
7), it shapes synaptic
plasticity
(8-10),
and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure
(11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with
each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as
clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific
modules and peptide motifs
(12). One such module is the
Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs
(13,
14). Another is the Src
homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein
partners (15). Intersectin is
a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of
proteins, including several involved in CME
(16). Intersectin has two
N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin,
SCAMP1, and numb
(17-19),
a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25
(17,
20,
21), and five SH3 domains in
its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain
proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS
(16,
22-25).
The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions
from CME (17,
26,
27) and signaling
(22,
28,
29) to mitogenesis
(30,
31) and regulation of the
actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold,
regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins
(21,
32-34).
In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a
longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in
neurons (26,
28,
35,
36). This isoform has all the
binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has
additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42
(23,
37) and a C2 domain at the C
terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins,
including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and
the development of dendritic spines
(19,
23,
24). In addition, because the
rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is
generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic
functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate
orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l
performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining
the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is
particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the
pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is
localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains
(38). Interestingly,
alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons
from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS
(39,
40). Thus, an endocytic
trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured
hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the
somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2
and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with
actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters
dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from
presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
20.
Jonathan M. Budzik So-Young Oh Olaf Schneewind 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12989-12997
Bacillus cereus and other Gram-positive bacteria elaborate pili
via a sortase D-catalyzed transpeptidation mechanism from major and minor
pilin precursor substrates. After cleavage of the LPXTG sorting
signal of the major pilin, BcpA, sortase D forms an amide bond between the
C-terminal threonine and the amino group of lysine within the YPKN motif of
another BcpA subunit. Pilus assembly terminates upon sortase A cleavage of the
BcpA sorting signal, resulting in a covalent bond between BcpA and the cell
wall cross-bridge. Here, we show that the IPNTG sorting signal of BcpB, the
minor pilin, is cleaved by sortase D but not by sortase A. The C-terminal
threonine of BcpB is amide-linked to the YPKN motif of BcpA, thereby
positioning BcpB at the tip of pili. Thus, unique attributes of the sorting
signals of minor pilins provide Gram-positive bacteria with a universal
mechanism ordering assembly of pili.Sortases catalyze transpeptidation reactions to assemble proteins in the
envelope of Gram-positive bacteria
(1). Secreted proteins require
a C-terminal sorting signal for sortase recognition such that sortase cleaves
the substrate at a short peptide motif and forms a thioester-linked
intermediate to its active site cysteine
(2–4).
Nucleophilic attack by an amino group within the bacterial envelope resolves
the thioester intermediate, generating an amide bond tethering surface
proteins at their C terminus onto Gram-positive bacteria
(5). Four classes of sortases
can be distinguished on the basis of sequence homology and substrate
recognition (6,
7). Sortase A cleaves secreted
protein at LPXTG sorting signals and recognizes the amino group of
lipid II peptidoglycan precursors as a nucleophile
(8,
9). Sortase B cleaves protein
substrates at NPQTN sorting signals
(10). This enzyme immobilizes
proteins within fully assembled cell walls, utilizing the cell wall
cross-bridge as a nucleophile
(11). Sortase C cuts LPNTA
sorting signals and anchors proteins to the peptidoglycan cross-bridges in
sporulating bacteria (12,
13). Finally, sortase D
catalyzes transpeptidation reactions in the assembly of pili
(14,
15). Sortase D recognizes the
amino group of lysine residues within the YPKN motif of pilin subunits as
nucleophiles (16). The
resultant sortase D-catalyzed amide bond links adjacent pilin subunits to grow
the pilus fiber (16,
17).Pili of Gram-positive bacteria comprised either two or three different
pilin subunits synthesized as cytoplasmic precursors with N-terminal signal
peptides and C-terminal sorting signals (P1 precursors)
(14,
18). After translocation
across the plasma membrane, P2 precursor species arise from removal of the
signal peptide from P1 precursors by a signal peptidase
(16). Bacillus cereus
pili are composed of two subunits; that is, the major pilin, BcpA, and the
minor pilin, BcpB (15). In
contrast to BcpA, which is deposited throughout the pilus, BcpB is found at
fiber tip (15). Sortase D
cleaves the BcpA LPXTG motif sorting signal between the threonine and
glycine residues to form an amide bond to the ε-amino group of the lysine
within the YPKN motif of adjacent BcpA subunits
(16). However, sortase A also
cleaves BcpA precursors, which are subsequently linked to the side chain amino
group of meso-diaminopimelic acid within lipid II
(19). The latter reaction
serves to terminate fiber elongation, immobilizing BcpA pili in the cell wall
envelope (19).The conservation of sortase D, the YPKN motif, and C-terminal sorting
signal in major pilin subunits suggest a universal pilus assembly mechanism
among Gram-positive bacteria
(14,
20). However, the molecular
mechanism whereby bacilli deposit BcpB, the minor pilin, at the tip of BcpA
pili is not known. Although the BcpB precursor harbors an N-terminal signal
peptide and a C-terminal IPNTG sorting signal, it lacks the YPKN pilin motif
of the major subunit (15).
Furthermore, the substrate properties of the BcpB IPNTG sorting signal for the
four classes of sortases expressed by bacilli has yet to be established. 相似文献