Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

CP12 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Permanent Specific ��Chaperone-like�� Protein of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase

A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein, mainly known for its redox function with A₄ glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection. Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation. Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein” for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving A₂B₂ GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria (1, 2), higher plants (3), the diatom Asterionella formosa (4, 5), and green (1) and red algae (6). It allows the formation of a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),³ two key enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway (7). The phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (8, 9) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (10, 11). In the green alga C. reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong (8). GAPDH may exist as a homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A₄) in higher plants, cyanobacteria, and green and red algae (6, 12), but in higher plants, it can also exist as a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), composed of two subunits, GapA and GapB (13, 14). GapB, up to now, has exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas CP12 is missing (15). The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues (16). Thus, although the A₄ GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues (13, 14, 17–20), they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12, as is well documented in the literature (1, 8, 11, 16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) (21–26). The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors (27, 28). They are often able to bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions (29, 30). Recently, some IUPs have been described in photosynthetic organisms (31, 32).There are many functional categories of IUPs (22, 33). They can be, for instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role, neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner molecule (33). These functions are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating its redox properties (8, 34, 35), and can also bind a metal ion (36, 37). IUPs can also bind transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a chaperone activity (31, 38). This chaperone function was first shown for α-synuclein (39) and for α-casein (40), which are fully disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH, if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known for its tendency to aggregate (41–44) and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies (45, 46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions (47, 48), CP12 forms a stable complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12 (35). However, only a site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site (49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve site-directed mutagenesis.     

Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

Analysis of Intracellular Substrates and Products of Thimet Oligopeptidase in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells

Thimet oligopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.15; EP24.15) is an intracellular enzyme that has been proposed to metabolize peptides within cells, thereby affecting antigen presentation and G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction. However, only a small number of intracellular substrates of EP24.15 have been reported previously. Here we have identified over 100 peptides in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells that are derived from intracellular proteins; many but not all of these peptides are substrates or products of EP24.15. First, cellular peptides were extracted from HEK293 cells and incubated in vitro with purified EP24.15. Then the peptides were labeled with isotopic tags and analyzed by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. A related series of experiments tested the effect of overexpression of EP24.15 on the cellular levels of peptides in HEK293 cells. Finally, synthetic peptides that corresponded to 10 of the cellular peptides were incubated with purified EP24.15 in vitro, and the cleavage was monitored by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Many of the EP24.15 substrates identified by these approaches are 9–11 amino acids in length, supporting the proposal that EP24.15 can function in the degradation of peptides that could be used for antigen presentation. However, EP24.15 also converts some peptides into products that are 8–10 amino acids, thus contributing to the formation of peptides for antigen presentation. In addition, the intracellular peptides described here are potential candidates to regulate protein interactions within cells.Intracellular protein turnover is a crucial step for cell functioning, and if this process is impaired, the elevated levels of aged proteins usually lead to the formation of intracellular insoluble aggregates that can cause severe pathologies (1). In mammalian cells, most proteins destined for degradation are initially tagged with a polyubiquitin chain in an energy-dependent process and then digested to small peptides by the 26 S proteasome, a large proteolytic complex involved in the regulation of cell division, gene expression, and other key processes (2, 3). In eukaryotes, 30–90% of newly synthesized proteins may be degraded by proteasomes within minutes of synthesis (3, 4). In addition to proteasomes, other extralysosomal proteolytic systems have been reported (5, 6). The proteasome cleaves proteins into peptides that are typically 2–20 amino acids in length (7). In most cases, these peptides are thought to be rapidly hydrolyzed into amino acids by aminopeptidases (8–10). However, some intracellular peptides escape complete degradation and are imported into the endoplasmic reticulum where they associate with major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)³ molecules and traffic to the cell surface for presentation to the immune system (10–12). Additionally, based on the fact that free peptides added to the intracellular milieu can regulate cellular functions mediated by protein interactions such as gene regulation, metabolism, cell signaling, and protein targeting (13, 14), intracellular peptides generated by proteasomes that escape degradation have been suggested to play a role in regulating protein interactions (15). Indeed, oligopeptides isolated from rat brain tissue using the catalytically inactive EP24.15 (EC 3.4.24.15) were introduced into Chinese hamster ovarian-S and HEK293 cells and were found capable of altering G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction (16). Moreover, EP24.15 overexpression itself changed both angiotensin II and isoproterenol signal transduction, suggesting a physiological function for its intracellular substrates/products (16).EP24.15 is a zinc-dependent peptidase of the metallopeptidase M3 family that contains the HEXXH motif (17). This enzyme was first described as a neuropeptide-degrading enzyme present in the soluble fraction of brain homogenates (18). Whereas EP24.15 can be secreted (19, 20), its predominant location in the cytosol and nucleus suggests that the primary function of this enzyme is not the extracellular degradation of neuropeptides and hormones (21, 22). EP24.15 was shown in vivo to participate in antigen presentation through MHC-I (23–25) and in vitro to bind (26) or degrade (27) some MHC-I associated peptides. EP24.15 has also been shown in vitro to degrade peptides containing 5–17 amino acids produced after proteasome digestion of β-casein (28). EP24.15 shows substrate size restriction to peptides containing from 5 to 17 amino acids because of its catalytic center that is located in a deep channel (29). Despite the size restriction, EP24.15 has a broad substrate specificity (30), probably because a significant portion of the enzyme-binding site is lined with potentially flexible loops that allow reorganization of the active site following substrate binding (29). Recently, it has also been suggested that certain substrates may be cleaved by an open form of EP24.15 (31). This characteristic is supported by the ability of EP24.15 to accommodate different amino acid residues at subsites S4 to S3′, which even includes the uncommon post-proline cleavage (30). Such biochemical and structural features make EP24.15 a versatile enzyme to degrade structurally unrelated oligopeptides.Previously, brain peptides that bound to catalytically inactive EP24.15 were isolated and identified using mass spectrometry (22). The majority of peptides captured by the inactive enzyme were intracellular protein fragments that efficiently interacted with EP24.15; the smallest peptide isolated in these assays contained 5 and the largest 17 amino acids (15, 16, 22, 32), which is within the size range previously reported for natural and synthetic substrates of EP24.15 (18, 30, 33, 34). Interestingly, the peptides released by the proteasome are in the same size range of EP24.15 competitive inhibitors/substrates (7, 35, 36). Taken altogether, these data suggest that in the intracellular environment EP24.15 could further cleave proteasome-generated peptides unrelated to MHC-I antigen presentation (15).Although the mutated inactive enzyme “capture” assay was successful in identifying several cellular protein fragments that were substrates for EP24.15, it also found some interacting peptides that were not substrates. In this study, we used several approaches to directly screen for cellular peptides that were cleaved by EP24.15. The first approach involved the extraction of cellular peptides from the HEK293 cell line, incubation in vitro with purified EP24.15, labeling with isotopic tags, and analysis by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. The second approach examined the effect of EP24.15 overexpression on the cellular levels of peptides in the HEK293 cell line. The third set of experiments tested synthetic peptides with purified EP24.15 in vitro, and examined cleavage by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Collectively, these studies have identified a large number of intracellular peptides, including those that likely represent the endogenous substrates and products of EP24.15, and this original information contributes to a better understanding of the function of this enzyme in vivo.     

Sortase D Forms the Covalent Bond That Links BcpB to the Tip of Bacillus cereus Pili

Bacillus cereus and other Gram-positive bacteria elaborate pili via a sortase D-catalyzed transpeptidation mechanism from major and minor pilin precursor substrates. After cleavage of the LPXTG sorting signal of the major pilin, BcpA, sortase D forms an amide bond between the C-terminal threonine and the amino group of lysine within the YPKN motif of another BcpA subunit. Pilus assembly terminates upon sortase A cleavage of the BcpA sorting signal, resulting in a covalent bond between BcpA and the cell wall cross-bridge. Here, we show that the IPNTG sorting signal of BcpB, the minor pilin, is cleaved by sortase D but not by sortase A. The C-terminal threonine of BcpB is amide-linked to the YPKN motif of BcpA, thereby positioning BcpB at the tip of pili. Thus, unique attributes of the sorting signals of minor pilins provide Gram-positive bacteria with a universal mechanism ordering assembly of pili.Sortases catalyze transpeptidation reactions to assemble proteins in the envelope of Gram-positive bacteria (1). Secreted proteins require a C-terminal sorting signal for sortase recognition such that sortase cleaves the substrate at a short peptide motif and forms a thioester-linked intermediate to its active site cysteine (2–4). Nucleophilic attack by an amino group within the bacterial envelope resolves the thioester intermediate, generating an amide bond tethering surface proteins at their C terminus onto Gram-positive bacteria (5). Four classes of sortases can be distinguished on the basis of sequence homology and substrate recognition (6, 7). Sortase A cleaves secreted protein at LPXTG sorting signals and recognizes the amino group of lipid II peptidoglycan precursors as a nucleophile (8, 9). Sortase B cleaves protein substrates at NPQTN sorting signals (10). This enzyme immobilizes proteins within fully assembled cell walls, utilizing the cell wall cross-bridge as a nucleophile (11). Sortase C cuts LPNTA sorting signals and anchors proteins to the peptidoglycan cross-bridges in sporulating bacteria (12, 13). Finally, sortase D catalyzes transpeptidation reactions in the assembly of pili (14, 15). Sortase D recognizes the amino group of lysine residues within the YPKN motif of pilin subunits as nucleophiles (16). The resultant sortase D-catalyzed amide bond links adjacent pilin subunits to grow the pilus fiber (16, 17).Pili of Gram-positive bacteria comprised either two or three different pilin subunits synthesized as cytoplasmic precursors with N-terminal signal peptides and C-terminal sorting signals (P1 precursors) (14, 18). After translocation across the plasma membrane, P2 precursor species arise from removal of the signal peptide from P1 precursors by a signal peptidase (16). Bacillus cereus pili are composed of two subunits; that is, the major pilin, BcpA, and the minor pilin, BcpB (15). In contrast to BcpA, which is deposited throughout the pilus, BcpB is found at fiber tip (15). Sortase D cleaves the BcpA LPXTG motif sorting signal between the threonine and glycine residues to form an amide bond to the ε-amino group of the lysine within the YPKN motif of adjacent BcpA subunits (16). However, sortase A also cleaves BcpA precursors, which are subsequently linked to the side chain amino group of meso-diaminopimelic acid within lipid II (19). The latter reaction serves to terminate fiber elongation, immobilizing BcpA pili in the cell wall envelope (19).The conservation of sortase D, the YPKN motif, and C-terminal sorting signal in major pilin subunits suggest a universal pilus assembly mechanism among Gram-positive bacteria (14, 20). However, the molecular mechanism whereby bacilli deposit BcpB, the minor pilin, at the tip of BcpA pili is not known. Although the BcpB precursor harbors an N-terminal signal peptide and a C-terminal IPNTG sorting signal, it lacks the YPKN pilin motif of the major subunit (15). Furthermore, the substrate properties of the BcpB IPNTG sorting signal for the four classes of sortases expressed by bacilli has yet to be established.     

Mapping Daunorubicin-binding Sites in the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter MsbA Using Site-specific Quenching by Spin Labels

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters transduce the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the mechanical work of substrate translocation across cell membranes. MsbA is an ABC transporter implicated in trafficking lipid A across the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. It has sequence similarity and overlapping substrate specificity with multidrug ABC transporters that export cytotoxic molecules in humans and prokaryotes. Despite rapid advances in structure determination of ABC efflux transporters, little is known regarding the location of substrate-binding sites in the transmembrane segment and the translocation pathway across the membrane. In this study, we have mapped residues proximal to the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site in MsbA using site-specific, ATP-dependent quenching of DNR intrinsic fluorescence by spin labels. In the nucleotide-free MsbA intermediate, DNR-binding residues cluster at the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 at a site accessible from the membrane/water interface and extending into an aqueous chamber formed at the interface between the two transmembrane domains. Binding of a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog inverts the transporter to an outward-facing conformation and relieves DNR quenching by spin labels suggesting DNR exclusion from proximity to the spin labels. The simplest model consistent with our data has DNR entering near an elbow helix parallel to the water/membrane interface, partitioning into the open chamber, and then translocating toward the periplasm upon ATP binding.ATP-binding cassette (ABC)² transporters transduce the energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the movement of a wide range of substrates across the cell membranes (1, 2). They constitute the largest family of prokaryotic transporters, import essential cell nutrients, flip lipids, and export toxic molecules (3). Forty eight human ABC transporters have been identified, including ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein, which is implicated in cross-resistance to drugs and cytotoxic molecules (4, 5). Inherited mutations in these proteins are linked to diseases such as cystic fibrosis, persistent hypoglycemia of infancy, and immune deficiency (6).The functional unit of an ABC transporter consists of four modules. Two highly conserved ABCs or nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) bind and hydrolyze ATP to supply the active energy for transport (7). ABCs drive the mechanical work of proteins with diverse functions ranging from membrane transport to DNA repair (3, 5). Substrate specificity is determined by two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that also provide the translocation pathway across the bilayer (7). Bacterial ABC exporters are expressed as monomers, each consisting of one NBD and one TMD, that dimerize to form the active transporter (3). The number of transmembrane helices and their organization differ significantly between ABC importers and exporters reflecting the divergent structural and chemical nature of their substrates (1, 8, 9). Furthermore, ABC exporters bind substrates directly from the cytoplasm or bilayer inner leaflet and release them to the periplasm or bilayer outer leaflet (10, 11). In contrast, bacterial importers have their substrates delivered to the TMD by a dedicated high affinity substrate-binding protein (12).In Gram-negative bacteria, lipid A trafficking from its synthesis site on the inner membrane to its final destination in the outer membrane requires the ABC transporter MsbA (13). Although MsbA has not been directly shown to transport lipid A, suppression of MsbA activity leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid A and inhibits bacterial growth strongly suggesting a role in translocation (14-16). In addition to this role in lipid A transport, MsbA shares sequence similarity with multidrug ABC transporters such as human ABCB1, LmrA of Lactococcus lactis, and Sav1866 of Staphylococcus aureus (16-19). ABCB1, a prototype of the ABC family, is a plasma membrane protein whose overexpression provides resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cells (1). LmrA and MsbA have overlapping substrate specificity with ABCB1 suggesting that both proteins can function as drug exporters (18, 20). Indeed, cells expressing MsbA confer resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide (21). MsbA can be photolabeled with the ABCB1/LmrA substrate azidopine and can transport Hoechst 33342 ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342) across membrane vesicles in an energy-dependent manner (21).The structural mechanics of ABC exporters was revealed from comparison of the MsbA crystal structures in the apo- and nucleotide-bound states as well as from analysis by spin labeling EPR spectroscopy in liposomes (17, 19, 22, 23). The energy harnessed from ATP binding and hydrolysis drives a cycle of NBD association and dissociation that is transmitted to induce reorientation of the TMD from an inward- to outward-facing conformation (17, 19, 22). Large amplitude motion closes the cytoplasmic end of a chamber found at the interface between the two TMDs and opens it to the periplasm (23). These rearrangements lead to significant changes in chamber hydration, which may drive substrate translocation (22).Substrate binding must precede energy input, otherwise the cycle is futile, wasting the energy of ATP hydrolysis without substrate extrusion (7). Consistent with this model, ATP binding reduces ABCB1 substrate affinity, potentially through binding site occlusion (24-26). Furthermore, the TMD substrate-binding event signals the NBD to stimulate ATP hydrolysis increasing transport efficiency (1, 27, 28). However, there is a paucity of information regarding the location of substrate binding, the transport pathway, and the structural basis of substrate recognition by ABC exporters. In vitro studies of MsbA substrate specificity identify a broad range of substrates that stimulate ATPase activity (29). In addition to the putative physiological substrates lipid A and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the ABCB1 substrates Ilmofosine, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342, and verapamil differentially enhance ATP hydrolysis of MsbA (29, 30). Intrinsic MsbA tryptophan (Trp) fluorescence quenching by these putative substrate molecules provides further support of interaction (29).Extensive biochemical analysis of ABCB1 and LmrA provides a general model of substrate binding to ABC efflux exporters. This so-called “hydrophobic cleaner model” describes substrates binding from the inner leaflet of the bilayer and then translocating through the TMD (10, 31, 32). These studies also identified a large number of residues involved in substrate binding and selectivity (33). When these crucial residues are mapped onto the crystal structures of MsbA, a subset of homologous residues clusters to helices 3 and 6 lining the putative substrate pathway (34). Consistent with a role in substrate binding and specificity, simultaneous replacement of two serines (Ser-289 and Ser-290) in helix 6 of MsbA reduces binding and transport of ethidium and taxol, although {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342 and erythromycin interactions remain unaffected (34).The tendency of lipophilic substrates to partition into membranes confounds direct analysis of substrate interactions with ABC exporters (35, 36). Such partitioning may promote dynamic collisions with exposed Trp residues and nonspecific cross-linking in photo-affinity labeling experiments. In this study, we utilize a site-specific quenching approach to identify residues in the vicinity of the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site (37). Although the data on DNR stimulation of ATP hydrolysis is inconclusive (20, 29, 30), the quenching of MsbA Trp fluorescence suggests a specific interaction. Spin labels were introduced along transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 6 of MsbA to assess their ATP-dependent quenching of DNR fluorescence. Residues that quench DNR cluster along the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 consistent with specific binding of DNR. Furthermore, many of these residues are not lipid-exposed but face the putative substrate chamber formed between the two TMDs. These residues are proximal to two Trps, which likely explains the previously reported quenching (29). Our results suggest DNR partitions to the membrane and then binds MsbA in a manner consistent with the hydrophobic cleaner model. Interpretation in the context of the crystal structures of MsbA identifies a putative translocation pathway through the transmembrane segment.     

Glutathione Participates in the Regulation of Mitophagy in Yeast

The antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine prevented the autophagy-dependent delivery of mitochondria to the vacuoles, as examined by fluorescence microscopy of mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent protein, transmission electron microscopy, and Western blot analysis of mitochondrial proteins. The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was specific to mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy). Indeed, autophagy-dependent activation of alkaline phosphatase and the presence of hallmarks of non-selective microautophagy were not altered by N-acetyl-l-cysteine. The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was not related to its scavenging properties, but rather to its fueling effect of the glutathione pool. As a matter of fact, the decrease of the glutathione pool induced by chemical or genetical manipulation did stimulate mitophagy but not general autophagy. Conversely, the addition of a cell-permeable form of glutathione inhibited mitophagy. Inhibition of glutathione synthesis had no effect in the strain Δuth1, which is deficient in selective mitochondrial degradation. These data show that mitophagy can be regulated independently of general autophagy, and that its implementation may depend on the cellular redox status.Autophagy is a major pathway for the lysosomal/vacuolar delivery of long-lived proteins and organelles, where they are degraded and recycled. Autophagy plays a crucial role in differentiation and cellular response to stress and is conserved in eukaryotic cells from yeast to mammals (1, 2). The main form of autophagy, macroautophagy, involves the non-selective sequestration of large portions of the cytoplasm into double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes, and their delivery to the vacuole/lysosome for degradation. Another process, microautophagy, involves the direct sequestration of parts of the cytoplasm by vacuole/lysosomes. The two processes coexist in yeast cells but their extent may depend on different factors including metabolic state: for example, we have observed that nitrogen-starved lactate-grown yeast cells develop microautophagy, whereas nitrogen-starved glucose-grown cells preferentially develop macroautophagy (3).Both macroautophagy and microautophagy are essentially non-selective, in the way that autophagosomes and vacuole invaginations do not appear to discriminate the sequestered material. However, selective forms of autophagy have been observed (4) that target namely peroxisomes (5, 6), chromatin (7, 8), endoplasmic reticulum (9), ribosomes (10), and mitochondria (3, 11–13). Although non-selective autophagy plays an essential role in survival by nitrogen starvation, by providing amino acids to the cell, selective autophagy is more likely to have a function in the maintenance of cellular structures, both under normal conditions as a “housecleaning” process, and under stress conditions by eliminating altered organelles and macromolecular structures (14–16). Selective autophagy targeting mitochondria, termed mitophagy, may be particularly relevant to stress conditions. The mitochondrial respiratory chain is both the main site and target of ROS⁴ production (17). Consequently, the maintenance of a pool of healthy mitochondria is a crucial challenge for the cells. The progressive accumulation of altered mitochondria (18) caused by the loss of efficiency of the maintenance process (degradation/biogenesis de novo) is often considered as a major cause of cellular aging (19–23). In mammalian cells, autophagic removal of mitochondria has been shown to be triggered following induction/blockade of apoptosis (23), suggesting that autophagy of mitochondria was required for cell survival following mitochondria injury (14). Consistent with this idea, a direct alteration of mitochondrial permeability properties has been shown to induce mitochondrial autophagy (13, 24, 25). Furthermore, inactivation of catalase induced the autophagic elimination of altered mitochondria (26). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the alteration of F₀F₁-ATPase biogenesis in a conditional mutant has been shown to trigger autophagy (27). Alterations of mitochondrial ion homeostasis caused by the inactivation of the K⁺/H⁺ exchanger was shown to cause both autophagy and mitophagy (28). We have reported that treatment of cells with rapamycin induced early ROS production and mitochondrial lipid oxidation that could be inhibited by the hydrophobic antioxidant resveratrol (29). Furthermore, resveratrol treatment impaired autophagic degradation of both cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins and delayed rapamycin-induced cell death, suggesting that mitochondrial oxidation events may play a crucial role in the regulation of autophagy. This existence of regulation of autophagy by ROS has received molecular support in HeLa cells (30): these authors showed that starvation stimulated ROS production, namely H₂O₂, which was essential for autophagy. Furthermore, they identified the cysteine protease hsAtg4 as a direct target for oxidation by H₂O₂. This provided a possible connection between the mitochondrial status and regulation of autophagy.Investigations of mitochondrial autophagy in nitrogen-starved lactate-grown yeast cells have established the existence of two distinct processes: the first one occurring very early, is selective for mitochondria and is dependent on the presence of the mitochondrial protein Uth1p; the second one occurring later, is not selective for mitochondria, is not dependent on Uth1p, and is a form of bulk microautophagy (3). The absence of the selective process in the Δuth1 mutant strongly delays and decreases mitochondrial protein degradation (3, 12). The putative protein phosphatase Aup1p has been also shown to be essential in inducing mitophagy (31). Additionally several Atg proteins were shown to be involved in vacuolar sequestration of mitochondrial GFP (3, 12, 32, 33). Recently, the protein Atg11p, which had been already identified as an essential protein for selective autophagy has also been reported as being essential for mitophagy (33).The question remains as to identify of the signals that trigger selective mitophagy. It is particularly intriguing that selective mitophagy is activated very early after the shift to a nitrogen-deprived medium (3). Furthermore, selective mitophagy is very active on lactate-grown cells (with fully differentiated mitochondria) but is nearly absent in glucose-grown cells (3). In the present paper, we investigated the relationships between the redox status of the cells and selective mitophagy, namely by manipulating glutathione. Our results support the view that redox imbalance is a trigger for the selective elimination of mitochondria.     

Phosphorylation of p53 Is Regulated by TPX2-Aurora A in Xenopus Oocytes

p53 is an important tumor suppressor regulating the cell cycle at multiple stages in higher vertebrates. The p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated in human cancers, resulting in loss of p53 activity. This leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, three phenotypes also observed after overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Aurora A. Accordingly, recent studies have focused on the relationship between these two proteins. p53 and Aurora A have been reported to interact in mammalian cells, but the function of this interaction remains unclear. We recently reported that Xenopus p53 can inhibit Aurora A activity in vitro but only in the absence of TPX2. Here we investigate the interplay between Xenopus Aurora A, TPX2, and p53 and show that newly synthesized TPX2 is required for nearly all Aurora A activation and for full p53 synthesis and phosphorylation in vivo during oocyte maturation. In vitro, phosphorylation mediated by Aurora A targets serines 129 and 190 within the DNA binding domain of p53. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down studies indicate that the interaction occurs via the p53 transactivation domain and the Aurora A catalytic domain around the T-loop. Our studies suggest that targeting of TPX2 might be an effective strategy for specifically inhibiting the phosphorylation of Aurora A substrates, including p53.Aurora A is an oncogenic protein kinase that is active in mitosis and plays important roles in spindle assembly and centrosome function (1). Overexpression of either human or Xenopus Aurora A transforms mammalian cells, but only when the p53 pathway is altered (2–4). Aurora A is localized on centrosomes during mitosis, and overexpression of the protein leads to centrosome amplification and aneuploidy (2, 3, 5, 6), two likely contributors to genomic instability (7, 8). Because of its oncogenic potential and amplification in human tumors, considerable attention has been focused on the mechanism of Aurora A activation in mitosis. Evidence from several laboratories indicates that activation occurs as a result of phosphorylation of a threonine residue in the T-loop of the kinase (4, 9, 10). Purification of Aurora A-activating activity from M phase Xenopus egg extracts led to an apparent activation mechanism in which autophosphorylation at the T-loop is stimulated by binding of the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) (11–14). On the other hand, it has been shown that Aurora A activity can be inhibited by interaction with several proteins, including PP1 (protein phosphatase 1), AIP (Aurora A kinase-interacting protein), and, more recently, p53 (9, 15–17).p53 is a well known tumor suppressor able to drive cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, or senescence when DNA is damaged or cell integrity is threatened (18, 19). In human cancers, the p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated, leading to inactivation of p53 functions (20). p53 protein is almost undetectable in “normal cells,” mainly due to its instability. Indeed, during a normal cell cycle, p53 associates with Mdm2 in the nucleus and thereafter undergoes nuclear exclusion, allowing its ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (21). In cells under stress, p53 is stabilized through the disruption of its interaction with Mdm2 (21), leading to p53 accumulation in the nucleus and triggering different responses, as described above.Although p53 has mostly been characterized as a nuclear protein, it has also been shown to localize on centrosomes (22–24) and regulate centrosome duplication (23, 24). Centrosomes are believed to act as scaffolds that concentrate many regulatory molecules involved in signal transduction, including multiple protein kinases (25). Thus, centrosomal localization of p53 might be important for its own regulation by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and one of its regulators could be the mitotic kinase Aurora A. Indeed, phenotypes associated with the misexpression of these two proteins are very similar. For example, overexpression of Aurora A kinase leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, and the same effects are often observed after down-regulation of p53 transactivation activity or deletion/mutation of its gene (26, 27).Several recent studies performed in mammalian models show interplay between p53 and Aurora A, with each protein having the ability to inhibit the other, depending on the stage of the cell cycle and the stress level of the cell (17, 28, 29). These studies reported that p53 is a substrate of Aurora A, and serines 215 and 315 were demonstrated to be the two major Aurora A phosphorylation sites in human p53 in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ser-215 within the DNA binding domain of human p53 inhibited both p53 DNA binding and transactivation activities (29). Recently, our group showed that Xenopus p53 is able to inhibit Aurora A kinase activity in vitro, but this inhibitory effect can be suppressed by prior binding of Aurora A to TPX2 (9). Contrary to somatic cells, where p53 is nuclear, unstable, and expressed at a very low level, p53 is highly expressed in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and stable until later stages of development (30, 31). The high concentration of both p53 and Aurora A in the oocyte provided a suitable basis for investigating p53-Aurora A interaction and also evaluating Xenopus p53 as a substrate of Aurora A.