Enhancement of myosin II/actin turnover at the contractile ring induces slower furrowing in dividing HeLa cells

Myosin II ATPase activity is enhanced by the phosphorylation of MRLC (myosin II regulatory light chain) in non-muscle cells. It is well known that pMRLC (phosphorylated MRLC) co-localizes with F-actin (filamentous actin) in the CR (contractile ring) of dividing cells. Recently, we reported that HeLa cells expressing non-phosphorylatable MRLC show a delay in the speed of furrow ingression, suggesting that pMRLC plays an important role in the control of furrow ingression. However, it is still unclear how pMRLC regulates myosin II and F-actin at the CR to control furrow ingression during cytokinesis. In the present study, to clarify the roles of pMRLC, we measured the turnover of myosin II and actin at the CR in dividing HeLa cells expressing fluorescent-tagged MRLCs and actin by FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). A myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin, caused an enhancement of the turnover of MRLC and actin at the CR, which induced a delay in furrow ingression. Furthermore, only non-phosphorylatable MRLC and a Rho-kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, accelerated the turnover of MRLC and actin at the CR. Interestingly, the effect of Y-27632 was cancelled in the cell expressing phosphomimic MRLCs. Taken together, these results reveal that pMRLC reduces the turnover of myosin II and also actin at the CR. In conclusion, we show that the enhancement of myosin II and actin turnover at the CR induced slower furrowing in dividing HeLa cells.     

Biochemical and biological properties of cortexillin III,a component of Dictyostelium DGAP1–cortexillin complexes

Cortexillins I–III are members of the α-actinin/spectrin subfamily of Dictyostelium calponin homology proteins. Unlike recombinant cortexillins I and II, which form homodimers as well as heterodimers in vitro, we find that recombinant cortexillin III is an unstable monomer but forms more stable heterodimers when coexpressed in Escherichia coli with cortexillin I or II. Expressed cortexillin III also forms heterodimers with both cortexillin I and II in vivo, and the heterodimers complex in vivo with DGAP1, a Dictyostelium GAP protein. Binding of cortexillin III to DGAP1 requires the presence of either cortexillin I or II; that is, cortexillin III binds to DGAP1 only as a heterodimer, and the heterodimers form in vivo in the absence of DGAP1. Expressed cortexillin III colocalizes with cortexillins I and II in the cortex of vegetative amoebae, the leading edge of motile cells, and the cleavage furrow of dividing cells. Colocalization of cortexillin III and F-actin may require the heterodimer/DGAP1 complex. Functionally, cortexillin III may be a negative regulator of cell growth, cytokinesis, pinocytosis, and phagocytosis, as all are enhanced in cortexillin III–null cells.     

Myosin II Recruitment during Cytokinesis Independent of Centralspindlin-mediated Phosphorylation

During cell division, the mechanisms by which myosin II is recruited to the contractile ring are not fully understood. Much recent work has focused on a model in which spatially restricted de novo filament assembly occurs at the cell equator via localized myosin II regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation, stimulated by the RhoA-activating centralspindlin complex. Here, we show that a recombinant myosin IIA protein that assembles constitutively and is incapable of binding RLC still displays strong localization to the furrow in mammalian cells. Furthermore, this RLC-deficient myosin II efficiently drives cytokinesis, demonstrating that centralspindlin-based RLC phosphorylation is not necessary for myosin II localization during furrowing. Myosin II truncation analysis further reveals two distinct myosin II tail properties that contribute to furrow localization: a central tail domain mediating cortical furrow binding to heterologous binding partners and a carboxyl-terminal region mediating co-assembly with existing furrow myosin IIA or IIB filaments.Non-muscle myosin II, through its interaction with F-actin, is believed to be the dominant force-producing machinery utilized to separate daughter cells during cell division. Following anaphase onset, myosin II is recruited to the equatorial cortex where it assembles into the contractile ring. Despite much recent progress, the exact mechanism by which myosin II is recruited to and retained in the contractile ring in the proper spatio-temporal manner remains unclear.Myosin II is a member of the myosin superfamily that binds F-actin and hydrolyzes ATP to produce force. A monomer consists of two myosin heavy chains (“MHCs”),³ two essential light chains (“ELCs”), and two regulatory light chains (“RLCs”) (see Fig. 1A). The MHC consists of an amino-terminal globular head domain often referred to as the “motor” domain. It is responsible for F-actin binding and ATP binding and hydrolysis. One RLC and one ELC associate with each MHC via two IQ motifs on a neck region linking the head and tail domain. The remainder of the MHC forms a continuous α-helix that interacts with another MHC rod to create a coiled-coil-mediated dimer. At the extreme C terminus, mammalian non-muscle myosin II molecules contain an ∼30 residue “non-helical tailpiece.” Many phosphorylation sites have been identified on both the RLC and the MHC (1–4). The best characterized of these sites is Thr-18/Ser-19 on the RLC, which, when phosphorylated, has been shown to activate myosin II by increasing the affinity of MHC for F-actin, consequently increasing the ATPase activity (5, 6). Phosphorylation of these sites is also able to convert myosin II from a folded 10 S “inactive” monomer into the extended 6 S monomer that readily forms filaments (7).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.RLC-independent localization of myosin to furrow in HeLa and COS-7 cells. A, diagram of myosin IIA. GFP was conjugated to the amino terminus of the MHC. B, diagram of GFP-IIA constructs. GFP-IIA-ΔIQ2 removes the RLC binding site known as the IQ2 motif. C and D, at 72 h after transfection, HeLa (C) or COS-7 (D) cells expressing GFP-IIA (top row) or GFP-IIA-ΔIQ2 in early anaphase (middle row) or late anaphase (lower row) were fixed and stained with phalloidin-568 (red) for actin and DAPI (blue) for DNA. The images in the right column are merges of actin, DNA, and GFP channels.Mammalian genomes contain three genes encoding non-muscle myosin II heavy chain isoforms, mhc IIA, IIB, and IIC. MHC IIA and IIB are widely expressed in many tissues and cell lines, whereas IIC is expressed with a more limited distribution (8). In mice, gene knockouts of mhc IIA and IIB result in differing phenotypes that are only partially rescued by the other isoform, suggesting that both isoform-specific and overlapping roles exist (9). Previous reports have suggested that myosin IIA and IIB isoforms are capable of co-assembling into mixed or heterotypic filaments (10, 11). However, there is also evidence showing that myosin II isoforms have different subcellular localization in non-mitotic cells, supportinga model in which homotypic filaments are the dominant filamentous structure in live cells (12, 13). Whether myosin IIA and IIB can co-assemble in the contractile ring of dividing cells is not known.The dominant model for furrow localization of myosin II during cell division hypothesizes spatially restricted equatorial activation and filament assembly via phosphorylation of the RLC on Thr-18/Ser-19. The most prominent upstream signaling pathway implicated in this furrow recruitment model is the centralspindlin pathway. In this pathway, the kinesin-6 protein MKLP1 anchors MgcRacGAP and a RhoGEF (ECT2) to the spindle midzone (14). This in turn locally activates RhoA, leading to activation of Rho kinase and/or citron kinase, both of which have been shown capable of phosphorylating RLC (15–18). Centralspindlin-based signals clearly contribute to myosin II-cytokinesis functions. However, whether these signals contribute to initial myosin II binding/recruitment, to myosin II contractile activation, or to both, is unresolved.Another recent study reported that GFP-tagged RLC constructs with alanine substitutions at the activating Thr-18/Ser-19 sites were still able to localize to the furrow of dividing HeLa cells, suggesting that RLC phosphorylation is not required for myosin equatorial localization (19). However, in that study, it was not clear how much endogenous wild type RLC was present; thus this result may represent a tracer amount of the T18A/S19A mutant RLC passively co-assembling with a larger pool of endogenous RLC-phosphorylated myosin II.Another proposed model for myosin recruitment to the equatorial region of a dividing cell is cortical flow. In this model, supported by observations in both Dictyostelium and mammalian cells, myosin filaments move along the cortex and into the furrow in a motor-dependent manner (20–22). However, recent studies using total internal reflection fluorescence imaging in normal rat kidney cells revealed no detectable myosin II cortical flow (23), raising uncertainty as to whether cortical flow is an important mechanism for myosin recruitment in mammalian cells.In this study, we provide the first evidence that mammalian myosin II can localize to the furrow of dividing cells independent of the regulatory light chain. These studies demonstrate that both robust myosin II recruitment to the furrow and efficient cell division can be achieved without spatially localized centralspindlin-mediated RLC phosphorylation. We conclude that other mechanisms such as cortical flow (22, 24) and/or equatorial myosin II binding partners (25, 26) must be sufficient for myosin II recruitment and cell furrowing in mammalian cells. Furthermore, we show that a headless myosin construct can localize to the contractile ring, supporting a model in which actin binding and ATPase activity are not required for myosin II recruitment. We also provide novel evidence that MHC isoforms are capable of co-assembling in the contractile ring.     

Supervillin binding to myosin II and synergism with anillin are required for cytokinesis

Cytokinesis, the process by which cytoplasm is apportioned between dividing daughter cells, requires coordination of myosin II function, membrane trafficking, and central spindle organization. Most known regulators act during late cytokinesis; a few, including the myosin II–binding proteins anillin and supervillin, act earlier. Anillin''s role in scaffolding the membrane cortex with the central spindle is well established, but the mechanism of supervillin action is relatively uncharacterized. We show here that two regions within supervillin affect cell division: residues 831–1281, which bind central spindle proteins, and residues 1–170, which bind the myosin II heavy chain (MHC) and the long form of myosin light-chain kinase. MHC binding is required to rescue supervillin deficiency, and mutagenesis of this site creates a dominant-negative phenotype. Supervillin concentrates activated and total myosin II at the furrow, and simultaneous knockdown of supervillin and anillin additively increases cell division failure. Knockdown of either protein causes mislocalization of the other, and endogenous anillin increases upon supervillin knockdown. Proteomic identification of interaction partners recovered using a high-affinity green fluorescent protein nanobody suggests that supervillin and anillin regulate the myosin II and actin cortical cytoskeletons through separate pathways. We conclude that supervillin and anillin play complementary roles during vertebrate cytokinesis.     

Myosin I Overexpression Impairs Cell Migration

Dictyostelium myoB, a member of the myosin I family of motor proteins, is important for controlling the formation and retraction of membrane projections by the cell's actin cortex (Novak, K.D., M.D. Peterson, M.C. Reedy, and M.A. Titus. 1995. J. Cell Biol. 131:1205–1221). Mutants that express a three- to sevenfold excess of myoB (myoB⁺ cells) were generated to further analyze the role of myosin I in these processes. The myoB⁺ cells move with an instantaneous velocity that is 35% of the wild-type rate and exhibit a 6–8-h delay in initiation of aggregation when placed under starvation conditions. The myoB⁺ cells complete the developmental cycle after an extended period of time, but they form fewer fruiting bodies that appear to be small and abnormal. The myoB⁺ cells are also deficient in their ability both to form distinct F-actin filled projections such as crowns and to become elongate and polarized. This defect can be attributed to the presence of at least threefold more myoB at the cortex of the myoB⁺ cells. In contrast, threefold overexpression of a truncated myoB that lacks the src homology 3 (SH3) domain (myoB/SH3⁻ cells) or myoB in which the consensus heavy chain phosphorylation site was mutated to an alanine (S332A-myoB) does not disturb normal cellular function. However, there is an increased concentration of myoB in the cortex of the myoB/SH3⁻ and S332A-myoB cells comparable to that found in the myoB⁺ cells. These results suggest that excess full-length cortical myoB prevents the formation of the actin-filled extensions required for locomotion by increasing the tension of the F-actin cytoskeleton and/ or retracting projections before they can fully extend. They also demonstrate a role for the phosphorylation site and SH3 domain in mediating the in vivo activity of myosin I.     

Genetic suppression of a phosphomimic myosin II identifies system-level factors that promote myosin II cleavage furrow accumulation

How myosin II localizes to the cleavage furrow in Dictyostelium and metazoan cells remains largely unknown despite significant advances in understanding its regulation. We designed a genetic selection using cDNA library suppression of 3xAsp myosin II to identify factors involved in myosin cleavage furrow accumulation. The 3xAsp mutant is deficient in bipolar thick filament assembly, fails to accumulate at the cleavage furrow, cannot rescue myoII-null cytokinesis, and has impaired mechanosensitive accumulation. Eleven genes suppressed this dominant cytokinesis deficiency when 3xAsp was expressed in wild-type cells. 3xAsp myosin II''s localization to the cleavage furrow was rescued by constructs encoding rcdBB, mmsdh, RMD1, actin, one novel protein, and a 14-3-3 hairpin. Further characterization showed that RMD1 is required for myosin II cleavage furrow accumulation, acting in parallel with mechanical stress. Analysis of several mutant strains revealed that different thresholds of myosin II activity are required for daughter cell symmetry than for furrow ingression dynamics. Finally, an engineered myosin II with a longer lever arm (2xELC), producing a highly mechanosensitive motor, could also partially suppress the intragenic 3xAsp. Overall, myosin II accumulation is the result of multiple parallel and partially redundant pathways that comprise a cellular contractility control system.     

Myosin II Is Involved in the Production of Constitutive Transport Vesicles from the TGN

The participation of nonmuscle myosins in the transport of organelles and vesicular carriers along actin filaments has been documented. In contrast, there is no evidence for the involvement of myosins in the production of vesicles involved in membrane traffic. Here we show that the putative TGN coat protein p200 (Narula, N., I. McMorrow, G. Plopper, J. Doherty, K.S. Matlin, B. Burke, and J.L. Stow. 1992. J. Cell Biol. 114: 1113–1124) is myosin II. The recruitment of myosin II to Golgi membranes is dependent on actin and is regulated by G proteins. Using an assay that studies the release of transport vesicles from the TGN in vitro, we provide functional evidence that p200/myosin is involved in the assembly of basolateral transport vesicles carrying vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSVG) from the TGN of polarized MDCK cells. The 50% reduced efficiency in VSVG vesicle release from the TGN in vitro after depletion of p200/myosin II could be reestablished to control levels by the addition of purified nonmuscle myosin II. Several inhibitors of the actin-stimulated ATPase activity of myosin specifically inhibited the release of VSVG-containing vesicles from the TGN.     

Specific Localization of Serine 19 Phosphorylated Myosin II during Cell Locomotion and Mitosis of Cultured Cells

Phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain of myosin II (RMLC) at Serine 19 by a specific enzyme, MLC kinase, is believed to control the contractility of actomyosin in smooth muscle and vertebrate nonmuscle cells. To examine how such phosphorylation is regulated in space and time within cells during coordinated cell movements, including cell locomotion and cell division, we generated a phosphorylation-specific antibody.

Motile fibroblasts with a polarized cell shape exhibit a bimodal distribution of phosphorylated myosin along the direction of cell movement. The level of myosin phosphorylation is high in an anterior region near membrane ruffles, as well as in a posterior region containing the nucleus, suggesting that the contractility of both ends is involved in cell locomotion. Phosphorylated myosin is also concentrated in cortical microfilament bundles, indicating that cortical filaments are under tension. The enrichment of phosphorylated myosin in the moving edge is shared with an epithelial cell sheet; peripheral microfilament bundles at the leading edge contain a higher level of phosphorylated myosin. On the other hand, the phosphorylation level of circumferential microfilament bundles in cell–cell contacts is low. These observations suggest that peripheral microfilaments at the edge are involved in force production to drive the cell margin forward while microfilaments in cell–cell contacts play a structural role. During cell division, both fibroblastic and epithelial cells exhibit an increased level of myosin phosphorylation upon cytokinesis, which is consistent with our previous biochemical study (Yamakita, Y., S. Yamashiro, and F. Matsumura. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 124:129–137). In the case of the NRK epithelial cells, phosphorylated myosin first appears in the midzones of the separating chromosomes during late anaphase, but apparently before the formation of cleavage furrows, suggesting that phosphorylation of RMLC is an initial signal for cytokinesis.

     

Rap1-dependent pathways coordinate cytokinesis in Dictyostelium

Cytokinesis is the final step of mitosis when a mother cell is separated into two daughter cells. Major cytoskeletal changes are essential for cytokinesis; it is, however, not well understood how the microtubules and actomyosin cytoskeleton are exactly regulated in time and space. In this paper, we show that during the early stages of cytokinesis, in rounded-up Dictyostelium discoideum cells, the small G-protein Rap1 is activated uniformly at the cell cortex. When cells begin to elongate, active Rap1 becomes restricted from the furrow region, where the myosin contractile ring is subsequently formed. In the final stages of cytokinesis, active Rap1 is only present at the cell poles. Mutant cells with decreased Rap1 activation at the poles showed strongly decreased growth rates. Hyperactivation of Rap1 results in severe growth delays and defective spindle formation in adherent cells and cell death in suspension. Furthermore, Rap mutants show aberrant regulation of the actomyosin cytoskeleton, resulting in extended furrow ingression times and asymmetrical cell division. We propose that Rap1 drives cytokinesis progression by coordinating the three major cytoskeletal components: microtubules, actin, and myosin II. Importantly, mutated forms of Rap also affect cytokinesis in other organisms, suggesting a conserved role for Rap in cell division.     

Involvement of an Actomyosin Contractile Ring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cytokinesis

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the mother cell and bud are connected by a narrow neck. The mechanism by which this neck is closed during cytokinesis has been unclear. Here we report on the role of a contractile actomyosin ring in this process. Myo1p (the only type II myosin in S. cerevisiae) forms a ring at the presumptive bud site shortly before bud emergence. Myo1p ring formation depends on the septins but not on F-actin, and preexisting Myo1p rings are stable when F-actin is depolymerized. The Myo1p ring remains in the mother–bud neck until the end of anaphase, when a ring of F-actin forms in association with it. The actomyosin ring then contracts to a point and disappears. In the absence of F-actin, the Myo1p ring does not contract. After ring contraction, cortical actin patches congregate at the mother–bud neck, and septum formation and cell separation rapidly ensue. Strains deleted for MYO1 are viable; they fail to form the actin ring but show apparently normal congregation of actin patches at the neck. Some myo1Δ strains divide nearly as efficiently as wild type; other myo1Δ strains divide less efficiently, but it is unclear whether the primary defect is in cytokinesis, septum formation, or cell separation. Even cells lacking F-actin can divide, although in this case division is considerably delayed. Thus, the contractile actomyosin ring is not essential for cytokinesis in S. cerevisiae. In its absence, cytokinesis can still be completed by a process (possibly localized cell–wall synthesis leading to septum formation) that appears to require septin function and to be facilitated by F-actin.     

Mammalian SEPT2 is required for scaffolding nonmuscle myosin II and its kinases

Mammalian septin SEPT2 belongs to a conserved family of filamentous GTPases that are associated with actin stress fibers in interphase cells and the contractile ring in dividing cells. Although SEPT2 is essential for cytokinesis, its role in this process remains undefined. Here, we report that SEPT2 directly binds nonmuscle myosin II (myosin II), and this association is important for fully activating myosin II in interphase and dividing cells. Inhibition of the SEPT2-myosin II interaction in interphase cells results in loss of stress fibers, while in dividing cells this causes instability of the ingressed cleavage furrow and dissociation of the myosin II from the Rho-activated myosin kinases ROCK and citron kinase. We propose that SEPT2-containing filaments provide a molecular platform for myosin II and its kinases to ensure the full activation of myosin II that is necessary for the final stages of cytokinesis.     

Role of Actin Polymerization and Adhesion to Extracellular Matrix in Rac- and Rho-induced Cytoskeletal Reorganization

Most animal cells use a combination of actin-myosin–based contraction and actin polymerization– based protrusion to control their shape and motility. The small GTPase Rho triggers the formation of contractile stress fibers and focal adhesion complexes (Ridley, A.J., and A. Hall. 1992. Cell. 70:389–399) while a close relative, Rac, induces lamellipodial protrusions and focal complexes in the lamellipodium (Nobes, C.D., and A. Hall. 1995. Cell. 81:53–62; Ridley, A.J., H.F. Paterson, C.L. Johnston, D. Diekmann, and A. Hall. 1992. Cell. 70:401–410); the Rho family of small GTPases may thus play an important role in regulating cell movement. Here we explore the roles of actin polymerization and extracellular matrix in Rho- and Rac-stimulated cytoskeletal changes. To examine the underlying mechanisms through which these GTPases control F-actin assembly, fluorescently labeled monomeric actin, Cy3-actin, was introduced into serum-starved Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. Incorporation of Cy3- actin into lamellipodial protrusions is concomitant with F-actin assembly after activation of Rac, but Cy3-actin is not incorporated into stress fibers formed immediately after Rho activation. We conclude that Rac induces rapid actin polymerization in ruffles near the plasma membrane, whereas Rho induces stress fiber assembly primarily by the bundling of actin filaments. Activation of Rho or Rac also leads to the formation of integrin adhesion complexes. Integrin clustering is not required for the Rho-induced assembly of actin-myosin filament bundles, or for vinculin association with actin bundles, but is required for stress fiber formation. Integrin-dependent focal complex assembly is not required for the Rac-induced formation of lamellipodia or membrane ruffles. It appears, therefore, that the assembly of large integrin complexes is not required for most of the actin reorganization or cell morphology changes induced by Rac or Rho activation in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts.     

Contractile ring formation in Xenopus egg and fission yeast

How actin filaments (F-actin) and myosin II (myosin) assemble to form the contractile ring was investigated with fission yeast and Xenopus egg. In fission yeast cells, an aster-like structure composed of F-actin cables is formed at the medial cortex of the cell during prophase to metaphase, and a single F-actin cable(s) extends from this structure, which seems to be a structural basis of the contractile ring. In early mitosis, myosin localizes as dots in the medial cortex independently of F-actin. Then they fuse with each other and are packed into a thin contractile ring. At the growing ends of the cleavage furrow of Xenopus eggs, F-actin at first assembles to form patches. Next they fuse with each other to form short F-actin bundles. The short bundles then form long bundles. Myosin seems to be transported by the cortical movement to the growing end and assembles there as spots earlier than F-actin. Actin polymerization into the patches is likely to occur after accumulation of myosin. The myosin spots and the F-actin patches are simultaneously reorganized to form the contractile ring bundles. The idea that a Ca signal triggers cleavage furrow formation was tested with Xenopus eggs during the first cleavage. We could not detect any Ca signals such as a Ca wave, Ca puffs or even Ca blips at the growing end of the cleavage furrow. Furthermore, cleavages are not affected by Ca-chelators injected into the eggs at concentrations sufficient to suppress the Ca waves. Thus we conclude that formation of the contractile ring is not induced by a Ca signal at the growing end of the cleavage furrow.     

Myosin Heavy Chain Phosphorylation Sites Regulate Myosin Localization during Cytokinesis in Live Cells

Conventional myosin II plays a fundamental role in the process of cytokinesis where, in the form of bipolar thick filaments, it is thought to be the molecular motor that generates the force necessary to divide the cell. In Dictyostelium, the formation of thick filaments is regulated by the phosphorylation of three threonine residues in the tail region of the myosin heavy chain. We report here on the effects of this regulation on the localization of myosin in live cells undergoing cytokinesis. We imaged fusion proteins of the green-fluorescent protein with wild-type myosin and with myosins where the three critical threonines had been changed to either alanine or aspartic acid. We provide evidence that thick filament formation is required for the accumulation of myosin in the cleavage furrow and that if thick filaments are overproduced, this accumulation is markedly enhanced. This suggests that myosin localization in dividing cells is regulated by myosin heavy chain phosphorylation.     

Cytokinesis mediated through the recruitment of cortexillins into the cleavage furrow.

The fact that substrate-anchored Dictyostelium cells undergo cytokinesis in the absence of myosin II underscores the importance of other proteins in enabling the cleavage furrow to constrict. Cortexillins, a pair of actin-bundling proteins, are required for normal cleavage. They are targeted to the incipient furrow in wild-type and, more prominently, in myosin II-null cells. No other F-actin bundling or cross-linking protein tested is co-localized. Green fluorescent protein fusions show that the N-terminal actin-binding domain of cortexillin I is dispensable and the C-terminal region is sufficient for translocation to the furrow and the rescue of cytokinesis. Cortexillins are suggested to have a targeting signal for coupling to a myosin II-independent system that directs transport of membrane proteins to the cleavage furrow.     

An agent-based model contrasts opposite effects of dynamic and stable microtubules on cleavage furrow positioning

From experiments by Foe and von Dassow (Foe, V.E., and G. von Dassow. 2008. J. Cell Biol. 183:457–470) and others, we infer a molecular mechanism for positioning the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Computer simulations reveal how this mechanism depends on quantitative motor-behavior details and explore how robustly this mechanism succeeds across a range of cell sizes.     

Brush Border Myosin–I Structure and ADP-dependent Conformational Changes Revealed by Cryoelectron Microscopy and Image Analysis

Brush border myosin–I (BBM-I) is a single-headed myosin found in the microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells, where it forms lateral bridges connecting the core bundle of actin filaments to the plasma membrane. Extending previous observations (Jontes, J.D., E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, and R.A. Milligan. 1995. Nature [Lond.]. 378:751–753), we have used cryoelectron microscopy and helical image analysis to generate three-dimensional (3D) maps of actin filaments decorated with BBM-I in both the presence and absence of 1 mM MgADP. In the improved 3D maps, we are able to see the entire light chain–binding domain, containing density for all three calmodulin light chains. This has enabled us to model a high resolution structure of BBM-I using the crystal structures of the chicken skeletal muscle myosin catalytic domain and essential light chain. Thus, we are able to directly measure the full magnitude of the ADP-dependent tail swing. The ~31° swing corresponds to ~63 Å at the end of the rigid light chain–binding domain. Comparison of the behavior of BBM-I with skeletal and smooth muscle subfragments-1 suggests that there are substantial differences in the structure and energetics of the biochemical transitions in the actomyosin ATPase cycle.     

Myosin VI is required for targeted membrane transport during cytokinesis

Myosin VI plays important roles in endocytic and exocytic membrane-trafficking pathways in cells. Because recent work has highlighted the importance of targeted membrane transport during cytokinesis, we investigated whether myosin VI plays a role in this process during cell division. In dividing cells, myosin VI undergoes dramatic changes in localization: in prophase, myosin VI is recruited to the spindle poles; and in cytokinesis, myosin VI is targeted to the walls of the ingressing cleavage furrow, with a dramatic concentration in the midbody region. Furthermore, myosin VI is present on vesicles moving into and out of the cytoplasmic bridge connecting the two daughter cells. Inhibition of myosin VI activity by small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown or by overexpression of dominant-negative myosin VI tail leads to a delay in metaphase progression and a defect in cytokinesis. GAIP-interacting protein COOH terminus (GIPC), a myosin VI binding partner, is associated with the function(s) of myosin VI in dividing cells. Loss of GIPC in siRNA knockdown cells results in a more than fourfold increase in the number of multinucleated cells. Our results suggest that myosin VI has novel functions in mitosis and that it plays an essential role in targeted membrane transport during cytokinesis.     

Myosin II activity is not essential for recruitment of myosin II to the furrow in dividing HeLa cells

To elucidate whether phosphorylation of myosin II regulatory light chain (MRLC) is essential for myosin II recruitment to the furrow during cytokinesis, HeLa cells transfected with three types of GFP-tagged recombinant MRLCs, wild-type MRLC, non-phosphorylated form of MRLC, and phosphorylated form of MRLC, were examined. Living cell-imaging showed that both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated form of MRLCs were recruited to the equator at the same time after anaphase onset, suggesting that phosphorylation of MRLC is not responsible for recruitment of myosin II to the equator. Moreover, the treatment with an inhibitor of myosin II activity, blebbistatin, induced no effect on recruitment of those three recombinant MRLCs. During cytokinesis, phosphorylated but not non-phosphorylated form of MRLC was retained in the equator. These results suggest that phosphorylation of MRLC is essential for retainment of myosin II in the furrow but not for initial recruitment of myosin II to the furrow in dividing HeLa cells.     

Small Espin: A Third Actin-bundling Protein and Potential Forked Protein Ortholog in Brush Border Microvilli

An ~30-kD isoform of the actin-binding/ bundling protein espin has been discovered in the brush borders of absorptive epithelial cells in rat intestine and kidney. Small espin is identical in sequence to the COOH terminus of the larger (~110-kD) espin isoform identified in the actin bundles of Sertoli cell–spermatid junctional plaques (Bartles, J.R., A. Wierda, and L. Zheng. 1996. J. Cell Sci. 109:1229–1239), but it contains two unique peptides at its NH₂ terminus. Small espin was localized to the parallel actin bundles of brush border microvilli, resisted extraction with Triton X-100, and accumulated in the brush border during enterocyte differentiation/migration along the crypt–villus axis in adults. In transfected BHK fibroblasts, green fluorescent protein–small espin decorated F-actin–containing fibers and appeared to elicit their accumulation and/or bundling. Recombinant small espin bound to skeletal muscle and nonmuscle F-actin with high affinity (K_d = 150 and 50 nM) and cross-linked the filaments into bundles. Sedimentation, gel filtration, and circular dichroism analyses suggested that recombinant small espin was a monomer with an asymmetrical shape and a high percentage of α-helix. Deletion mutagenesis suggested that small espin contained two actin-binding sites in its COOH-terminal 116–amino acid peptide and that the NH₂-terminal half of its forked homology peptide was necessary for bundling activity.