Actin-binding proteins regulate the work performed by myosin II motors on single actin filaments.

Regulation of actin/myosin II force generation by calcium [Kamm and Stull, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 51:299-313, 1989] and phosphorylation of myosin II light chains [Sellers and Adelstein, "The Enzymes," Vol. 18, Orlando, FL: Academic Pres, 1987, pp. 381-418] is well established. However, additional regulation of actin/myosin II force generation/contraction may result from actin-binding proteins [Stossel et al., Ann. Rev. Cell Biol. 1:353-402, 1985; Pollard and Cooper, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55:987-1035, 1986] as they affect the gel state of the actin cytomatrix [reviewed in Taylor and Condeelis, Int. Rev. Cytol., 56:57-143, 1979]. Regulation of the gel state of actin may determine whether an isotonic or isometric contraction results from the interaction between myosin and actin. We have extended the single actin filament motility assay of Kron and Spudich [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:6272-6276, 1986] by including filamin or alpha-actinin on the substrate with myosin II to examine how actin-crosslinking proteins regulate the movements of single actin filaments. Increasing amounts of actin-crosslinking proteins inhibit filament velocity and decrease the number of filaments moving. Reversal of crosslinking yields increased velocities and numbers of moving filaments. These results support the solation-contraction coupling hypothesis [see Taylor and Fechheimer, Phil. Trans. Soc. London B 299:185-197, 1982] which proposes that increased crosslinking of actin inhibits myosin-based contraction. This study also illustrates the potentially varied roles of different actin-crosslinking proteins and offers a novel method to examine actin-binding protein activity and their regulation of motility at the single molecule level.     

A physical model of ATP-induced actin-myosin movement in vitro.

The nature of the mechanism limiting the velocity of ATP-induced unidirectional movements of actin-myosin filaments in vitro is considered. In the sliding process two types of "cyclic" interactions between myosin heads and actin are involved, i.e., productive and nonproductive. In the productive interaction, myosin heads split ATP and generate a force which produces sliding between actin and myosin. In the nonproductive interaction "cycle," on the other hand, myosin heads rapidly attach to and detach from actin "reversibly," i.e., without splitting ATP or generating an active force. Such a nonproductive interaction "cycle" causes irreversible dissipation of sliding energy into heat, because the myosin cross-bridges during this interaction are passive elastic structures. This consideration has led us to postulate that such cross-bridges, in effect, exert viscous-like frictional drag on moving elements. Energetic considerations suggest that this frictional drag is much greater than the hydrodynamic viscous drag. We present a model in which the sliding velocity is limited by the balance between the force generated by myosin cross-bridges in the productive interaction and the frictional drag exerted by other myosin cross-bridges in the nonproductive interaction. The model is consistent with experimental findings of in vitro sliding, including the dependence of velocity on ATP concentration, as well as the sliding velocity of co-polymers of skeletal muscle myosin and phosphorylated and unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosins.     

The biochemical kinetics underlying actin movement generated by one and many skeletal muscle myosin molecules

To better understand how skeletal muscle myosin molecules move actin filaments, we determine the motion-generating biochemistry of a single myosin molecule and study how it scales with the motion-generating biochemistry of an ensemble of myosin molecules. First, by measuring the effects of various ligands (ATP, ADP, and P(i)) on event lifetimes, tau(on), in a laser trap, we determine the biochemical kinetics underlying the stepwise movement of an actin filament generated by a single myosin molecule. Next, by measuring the effects of these same ligands on actin velocities, V, in an in vitro motility assay, we determine the biochemistry underlying the continuous movement of an actin filament generated by an ensemble of myosin molecules. The observed effects of P(i) on single molecule mechanochemistry indicate that motion generation by a single myosin molecule is closely associated with actin-induced P(i) dissociation. We obtain additional evidence for this relationship by measuring changes in single molecule mechanochemistry caused by a smooth muscle HMM mutation that results in a reduced P(i)-release rate. In contrast, we observe that motion generation by an ensemble of myosin molecules is limited by ATP-induced actin dissociation (i.e., V varies as 1/tau(on)) at low [ATP], but deviates from this relationship at high [ATP]. The single-molecule data uniquely provide a direct measure of the fundamental mechanochemistry of the actomyosin ATPase reaction under a minimal load and serve as a clear basis for a model of ensemble motility in which actin-attached myosin molecules impose a load.     

Dynamic polymorphism of single actin molecules in the actin filament

Actin filament dynamics are critical in cell motility. The structure of actin filament changes spontaneously and can also be regulated by actin-binding proteins, allowing actin to readily function in response to external stimuli. The interaction with the motor protein myosin changes the dynamic nature of actin filaments. However, the molecular bases for the dynamic processes of actin filaments are not well understood. Here, we observed the dynamics of rabbit skeletal-muscle actin conformation by monitoring individual molecules in the actin filaments using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM). The time trajectories of FRET show that actin switches between low- and high-FRET efficiency states on a timescale of seconds. If actin filaments are chemically cross-linked, a state that inhibits myosin motility, the equilibrium shifts to the low-FRET conformation, whereas when the actin filament is interacting with myosin, the high-FRET conformation is favored. This dynamic equilibrium suggests that actin can switch between active and inactive conformations in response to external signals.     

The two actin-binding regions on the myosin heads of cardiac muscle

In the presence of myosin S1 or myosin heads, actin filaments tend to form bundles. The biological meaning of the bundling of actin filaments has been unclear. In this study, we found that the cardiac myosin heads can form the bundles of actin filaments more rapidly than can skeletal S1, as monitored by light scattering and electron microscopy. Moreover, the actin bundles formed by cardiac S1 were found to be more stable against mechanical agitation. The distance between actin filaments in the bundles was approximately 20 nm, which is comparable to the length of a myosin head and two actin molecules. This suggests the direct binding of S1 tails to the adjacent actin filament. The "essential" light chain of cardiac myosin could be cross-linked to the actin molecule in the bundle. When monomeric actin molecules were added to the bundle, the bundles could be dispersed into individual filaments. The three-dimensional structure of the dispersed actin filaments was reconstructed from electron cryo-microscopic images of the single actin filaments dispersed by monomer actin. We were able to demonstrate that cardiac myosin heads bind to two actin molecules: one actin molecule at the conventional actin-binding region and the other at the essential light-chain-binding region. This capability of cardiac myosin heads to bind two actin molecules is discussed in view of lower ATPase activity and slower shortening velocity than those of skeletal ones.     

Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap.

Purified smooth muscle myosin in the in vitro motility assay propels actin filaments at 1/10 the velocity, yet produces 3-4 times more force than skeletal muscle myosin. At the level of a single myosin molecule, these differences in force and actin filament velocity may be reflected in the size and duration of single motion and force-generating events, or in the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle. Specifically, an increase in either unitary force or duty cycle may explain the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth muscle myosin. Similarly, an increase in attached time or decrease in unitary displacement may explain the reduced actin filament velocity of smooth muscle myosin. To discriminate between these possibilities, we used a laser trap to measure unitary forces and displacements from single smooth and skeletal muscle myosin molecules. We analyzed our data using mean-variance analysis, which does not rely on scoring individual events by eye, and emphasizes periods in the data with constant properties. Both myosins demonstrated multiple but similar event populations with discrete peaks at approximately +11 and -11 nm in displacement, and 1.5 and 3.5 pN in force. Mean attached times for smooth muscle myosin were longer than for skeletal-muscle myosin. These results explain much of the difference in actin filament velocity between these myosins, and suggest that an increased duty cycle is responsible for the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth over skeletal-muscle myosin.     

Mechanical Coupling between Myosin Molecules Causes Differences between Ensemble and Single-Molecule Measurements

In contracting muscle, individual myosin molecules function as part of a large ensemble, hydrolyzing ATP to power the relative sliding of actin filaments. The technological advances that have enabled direct observation and manipulation of single molecules, including recent experiments that have explored myosin's force-dependent properties, provide detailed insight into the kinetics of myosin's mechanochemical interaction with actin. However, it has been difficult to reconcile these single-molecule observations with the behavior of myosin in an ensemble. Here, using a combination of simulations and theory, we show that the kinetic mechanism derived from single-molecule experiments describes ensemble behavior; but the connection between single molecule and ensemble is complex. In particular, even in the absence of external force, internal forces generated between myosin molecules in a large ensemble accelerate ADP release and increase how far actin moves during a single myosin attachment. These myosin-induced changes in strong binding lifetime and attachment distance cause measurable properties, such as actin speed in the motility assay, to vary depending on the number of myosin molecules interacting with an actin filament. This ensemble-size effect challenges the simple detachment limited model of motility, because even when motility speed is limited by ADP release, increasing attachment rate can increase motility speed.     

A structural model for actin-induced nucleotide release in myosin

Myosins are molecular motor proteins that harness the chemical energy stored in ATP to produce directed force along actin filaments. Complex communication pathways link the catalytic nucleotide-binding region, the structures responsible for force amplification and the actin-binding domain of myosin. We have crystallized the nucleotide-free motor domain of myosin II in a new conformation in which switch I and switch II, conserved loop structures involved in nucleotide binding, have moved away from the nucleotide-binding pocket. These movements are linked to rearrangements of the actin-binding region, which illuminate a previously unobserved communication pathway between the nucleotide-binding pocket and the actin-binding region, explain the reciprocal relationship between actin and nucleotide affinity and suggest a new mechanism for product release in myosin family motors.     

The Antiparallel Dimerization of Myosin X Imparts Bundle Selectivity for Processive Motility

Myosin X is an unconventional actin-based molecular motor involved in filopodial formation, microtubule-actin filament interaction, and cell migration. Myosin X is an important component of filopodia regulation, localizing to tips of growing filopodia by an unclear targeting mechanism. The native α-helical dimerization domain of myosin X is thought to associate with antiparallel polarity of the two amino acid chains, making myosin X the only myosin that is currently considered to form antiparallel dimers. This study aims to determine if antiparallel dimerization of myosin X imparts selectivity toward actin bundles by comparing the motility of parallel and antiparallel dimers of myosin X on single and fascin-bundled actin filaments. Antiparallel myosin X dimers exhibit selective processivity on fascin-bundled actin and are only weakly processive on single actin filaments below saturating [ATP]. Artificial forced parallel dimers of myosin X are robustly processive on both single and bundled actin, exhibiting no selectivity. To determine the relationship between gating of the reaction steps and observed differences in motility, a mathematical model was developed to correlate the parameters of motility with the biochemical and mechanical kinetics of the dimer. Results from the model, constrained by experimental data, suggest that the probability of binding forward, toward the barbed end of the actin filament, is lower in antiparallel myosin X on single actin filaments compared to fascin-actin bundles and compared to constructs of myosin X with parallel dimerization.     

Multiple- and single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor by nanometer-piconewton manipulation with a microneedle: unitary steps and forces.

We have developed a new technique for measurements of piconewton forces and nanometer displacements in the millisecond time range caused by actin-myosin interaction in vitro by manipulating single actin filaments with a glass microneedle. Here, we describe in full the details of this method. Using this method, the elementary events in energy transduction by the actomyosin motor, driven by ATP hydrolysis, were directly recorded from multiple and single molecules. We found that not only the velocity but also the force greatly depended on the orientations of myosin relative to the actin filament axis. Therefore, to avoid the effects of random orientation of myosin and association of myosin with an artificial substrate in the surface motility assay, we measured forces and displacements by myosin molecules correctly oriented in single synthetic myosin rod cofilaments. At a high myosin-to-rod ratio, large force fluctuations were observed when the actin filament interacted in the correct orientation with a cofilament. The noise analysis of the force fluctuations caused by a small number of heads showed that the myosin head generated a force of 5.9 +/- 0.8 pN at peak and 2.1 +/- 0.4 pN on average over the whole ATPase cycle. The rate constants for transitions into (k+) and out of (k-) the force generation state and the duty ratio were 12 +/- 2 s-1, and 22 +/- 4 s-1, and 0.36 +/- 0.07, respectively. The stiffness was 0.14 pN nm-1 head-1 for slow length change (100 Hz), which would be approximately 0.28 pN nm-1 head-1 for rapid length change or in rigor. At a very low myosin-to-rod ratio, distinct actomyosin attachment, force generation (the power stroke), and detachment events were directly detected. At high load, one power stroke generated a force spike with a peak value of 5-6 pN and a duration of 50 ms (k(-)-1), which were compatible with those of individual myosin heads deduced from the force fluctuations. As the load was reduced, the force of the power stroke decreased and the needle displacement increased. At near zero load, the mean size of single displacement spikes, i.e., the unitary steps caused by correctly oriented myosin, which were corrected for the stiffness of the needle-to-myosin linkage and the randomizing effect by the thermal vibration of the needle, was approximately 20 nm.     

Direct inhibition of the actomyosin motility by local anesthetics in vitro.

Using a recently developed in vitro motility assay, we have demonstrated that local anesthetics directly inhibit myosin-based movement of single actin filaments in a reversible dose-dependent manner. This is the first reported account of the actions of local anesthetics on purified proteins at the molecular level. In this study, two tertiary amine local anesthetics, lidocaine and tetracaine, were used. The inhibitory action of the local anesthetics on actomyosin sliding movement was pH dependent; the anesthetics were more potent at higher pH values, and this reaction was accompanied by an increased proportion of the uncharged form of the anesthetics. QX-314, a permanently charged derivative of lidocaine, had no effect on actomyosin sliding movement. These results indicate that the uncharged form of local anesthetics is predominantly responsible for the inhibition of actomyosin sliding movement. The local anesthetics inhibited sliding movement but hardly interfered with the binding of actin filaments to myosin on the surface or with actomyosin ATPase activity at low ionic strength. To characterize the actomyosin interaction in the presence of anesthetics, we measured the binding and breaking force of the actomyosin complex. The binding of actin filaments to myosin on the surface was not affected by lidocaine at low ionic strength. The breaking force, measured using optical tweezers, was approximately 1.5 pN per micron of an actin filament, which was much smaller than in rigor and isometric force. The binding and breaking force greatly decreased with increasing ionic strength, indicating that the remaining interaction is ionic in nature. The result suggests that the binding and ATPase of actomyosin are governed predominantly by ionic interaction, which is hardly affected by anesthetics; whereas the force generation requires hydrophobic interaction, which plays a major part of the strong binding and is blocked by anesthetics, in addition to the ionic interaction.     

UNC-87 isoforms,Caenorhabditis elegans calponin-related proteins,interact with both actin and myosin and regulate actomyosin contractility

Calponin-related proteins are widely distributed among eukaryotes and involved in signaling and cytoskeletal regulation. Calponin-like (CLIK) repeat is an actin-binding motif found in the C-termini of vertebrate calponins. Although CLIK repeats stabilize actin filaments, other functions of these actin-binding motifs are unknown. The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-87 gene encodes actin-binding proteins with seven CLIK repeats. UNC-87 stabilizes actin filaments and is essential for maintenance of sarcomeric actin filaments in striated muscle. Here we show that two UNC-87 isoforms, UNC-87A and UNC-87B, are expressed in muscle and nonmuscle cells in a tissue-specific manner by two independent promoters and exhibit quantitatively different effects on both actin and myosin. Both UNC-87A and UNC-87B have seven CLIK repeats, but UNC-87A has an extra N-terminal extension of ∼190 amino acids. Both UNC-87 isoforms bind to actin filaments and myosin to induce ATP-resistant actomyosin bundles and inhibit actomyosin motility. UNC-87A with an N-terminal extension binds to actin and myosin more strongly than UNC-87B. UNC-87B is associated with actin filaments in nonstriated muscle in the somatic gonad, and an unc-87 mutation causes its excessive contraction, which is dependent on myosin. These results strongly suggest that proteins with CLIK repeats function as a negative regulator of actomyosin contractility.     

Myosin surface loop 4 modulates inhibition of actomyosin 1b ATPase activity by tropomyosin

Structural studies of the class I myosin, MyoE, led to the predictions that loop 4, a surface loop near the actin-binding region that is longer in class I myosins than in other myosin subclasses, might limit binding of myosins I to actin when actin-binding proteins, like tropomyosin, are present, and might account for the exclusion of myosin I from stress fibers. To test these hypotheses, mutant molecules of the related mammalian class I myosin, Myo1b, in which loop 4 was truncated (from an amino acid sequence of RMNGLDES to NGLD) or replaced with the shorter and distinct loop 4 found in Dictyostelium myosin II (GAGEGA), were expressed in vitro and their interaction with actin and with actin-tropomyosin was tested. Saturating amounts of expressed fibroblast tropomyosin-2 resulted in a decrease in the maximum actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity of wild-type Myo1b but had little or no effect on the actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity of the two mutants. In motility assays, few actin filaments bound tightly to Myo1b-WT-coated cover slips when tropomyosin-2 was present, whereas actin filaments both bound and were translocated by Myo1b-NGLD or Myo1b-GAGEGA in both the presence and absence of tropomyosin-2. When expressed in mammalian cells, like the wild type, the mutant myosins were largely excluded from tropomyosin-containing actin filaments, indicating that in the cell additional factors besides loop 4 determine targeting of myosins I to specific subpopulations of actin filaments.     

A new muscle contractile system composed of a thick filament lattice and a single actin filament

To bridge the gap between the contractile system in muscle and in vitro motility assay, we have devised an A-band motility assay system. A glycerinated skeletal myofibril was treated with gelsolin to selectively remove the thin filaments and expose a single A-band. A single bead-tailed actin filament trapped by optical tweezers was made to interact with the inside or the outer surface of the A-band, and the displacement of the bead-tailed filament was measured in a physiological ionic condition by phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. We observed large back-and-forth displacement of the filament accompanied by a large change in developed force. Despite this large tension fluctuation, we found that the average force was proportional to the overlap inside and outside the A-band up to approximately 150 nm and 300 nm from the end of the A-band, respectively. Consistent with the difference in the density of myosin molecules, the average force per unit length of the overlap inside the A-band (the time-averaged force/myosin head was approximately 1 pN) was approximately twice as large as that outside. Thus, we conclude that the A-band motility assay system described here is suitable for studying force generation on a single actin filament, and its sliding movement within a regular three-dimensional thick filament lattice.     

Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions

Myosin IIIA (MYO3A) targets actin protrusion tips using a motility mechanism dependent on both motor and tail actin-binding activity [1]. We show that myosin IIIB (MYO3B) lacks tail actin-binding activity and is unable to target COS7 cell filopodia tips, yet is somehow able to target stereocilia tips. Strikingly, when MYO3B is coexpressed with espin-1 (ESPN1), a MYO3A cargo protein endogenously expressed in stereocilia [2], MYO3B targets and carries ESPN1 to COS7 filopodia tips. We show that this tip localization is lost when we remove the ESPN1 C terminus actin-binding site. We also demonstrate that, like MYO3A [2], MYO3B can elongate filopodia by transporting ESPN1 to the polymerizing end of actin filaments. The mutual dependence of MYO3B and ESPN1 for tip localization reveals a novel mechanism for the cell to regulate myosin tip localization via a reciprocal relationship with cargo that directly participates in actin binding for motility. Our results are consistent with a novel form of motility for class III myosins that requires both motor and tail domain actin-binding activity and show that the actin-binding tail can be replaced by actin-binding cargo. This study also provides a framework to better understand the late-onset hearing loss phenotype in patients with MYO3A mutations.     

The effects of smooth muscle caldesmon on actin filament motility.

The movement of reconstituted thin filaments over an immobilized surface of thiophosphorylated smooth muscle myosin was examined using an in vitro motility assay. Reconstituted thin filaments contained actin, tropomyosin, and either purified chicken gizzard caldesmon or the purified COOH-terminal actin-binding fragment of caldesmon. Control actin-tropomyosin filaments moved at a velocity of 2.3 +/- 0.5 microns/s. Neither intact caldesmon nor the COOH-terminal fragment, when maintained in the monomeric form by treatment with 10 mM dithiothreitol, had any effect on filament velocity; and yet both were potent inhibitors of actin-activated myosin ATPase activity, indicating that caldesmon primarily inhibits myosin binding as reported by Chalovich et al. (Chalovich, J. M., Hemric, M. E., and Velaz, L. (1990) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 599, 85-99). Inhibition of filament motion was, however, observed under conditions where cross-linking of caldesmon via disulfide bridges was present. To determine if monomeric caldesmon could "tether" actin filaments to the myosin surface by forming an actin-caldesmon-myosin complex as suggested by Chalovich et al., we looked for caldesmon-dependent filament binding and motility under conditions (80 mM KCl) where filament binding to myosin is weak and motility is not normally seen. At caldesmon concentrations > or = 0.26 microM, actin filament binding was increased and filament motion (2.6 +/- 0.6 microns/s) was observed. The enhanced motility seen with intact caldesmon was not observed with the addition of up to 26 microM COOH-terminal fragment. Moreover, a molar excess of the COOH-terminal fragment competitively reversed the enhanced binding seen with intact caldesmon. These results show that tethering of actin filaments to myosin by the formation of an actin-caldesmon-myosin complex enhanced productive acto-myosin interaction without placing a significant mechanical load on the moving filaments.     

The Role of Structural Dynamics of Actin in Class-Specific Myosin Motility

The structural dynamics of actin, including the tilting motion between the small and large domains, are essential for proper interactions with actin-binding proteins. Gly146 is situated at the hinge between the two domains, and we previously showed that a G146V mutation leads to severe motility defects in skeletal myosin but has no effect on motility of myosin V. The present study tested the hypothesis that G146V mutation impaired rotation between the two domains, leading to such functional defects. First, our study showed that depolymerization of G146V filaments was slower than that of wild-type filaments. This result is consistent with the distinction of structural states of G146V filaments from those of the wild type, considering the recent report that stabilization of actin filaments involves rotation of the two domains. Next, we measured intramolecular FRET efficiencies between two fluorophores in the two domains with or without skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin or the heavy meromyosin equivalent of myosin V in the presence of ATP. Single-molecule FRET measurements showed that the conformations of actin subunits of control and G146V actin filaments were different in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin. This altered conformation of G146V subunits may lead to motility defects in myosin II. In contrast, distributions of FRET efficiencies of control and G146V subunits were similar in the presence of myosin V, consistent with the lack of motility defects in G146V actin with myosin V. The distribution of FRET efficiencies in the presence of myosin V was different from that in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin, implying that the roles of actin conformation in myosin motility depend on the type of myosin.     

Motility of myosin V regulated by the dissociation of single calmodulin

Myosin V is a calmodulin-binding motor protein. The dissociation of single calmodulin molecules from individual myosin V molecules at 1 microM Ca(2+) correlates with a reduction in sliding velocity in an in vitro motility assay. The dissociation of two calmodulin molecules at 5 microM Ca(2+) correlates with a detachment of actin filaments from myosin V. To mimic the regulation of myosin V motility by Ca(2+) in a cell, caged Ca(2+) coupled with a UV flash system was used to produce Ca(2+) transients. During the Ca(2+) transient, myosin V goes through the functional cycle of reduced sliding velocity, actin detachment and reattachment followed by the recovery of the sliding velocity. These results indicate that myosin V motility is regulated by Ca(2+) through a reduction in actin-binding affinity resulting from the dissociation of single calmodulin molecules.     

Interaction of a Dictyostelium member of the plastin/fimbrin family with actin filaments and actin-myosin complexes.

A protein purified from cytoskeletal fractions of Dictyostelium discoideum proved to be a member of the fimbrin/plastin family of actin-bundling proteins. Like other family members, this Ca(2+)-inhibited 67-kDa protein contains two EF hands followed by two actin-binding sites of the alpha-actinin/beta-spectrin type. Dd plastin interacted selectively with actin isoforms: it bound to D. discoideum actin and to beta/gamma-actin from bovine spleen but not to alpha-actin from rabbit skeletal muscle. Immunofluorescence labeling of growth phase cells showed accumulation of Dd plastin in cortical structures associated with cell surface extensions. In the elongated, streaming cells of the early aggregation stage, Dd plastin was enriched in the front regions. To examine how the bundled actin filaments behave in myosin II-driven motility, complexes of F-actin and Dd plastin were bound to immobilized heavy meromyosin, and motility was started by photoactivating caged ATP. Actin filaments were immediately propelled out of bundles or even larger aggregates and moved on the myosin as separate filaments. This result shows that myosin can disperse an actin network when it acts as a motor and sheds light on the dynamics of protein-protein interactions in the cortex of a motile cell where myosin II and Dd plastin are simultaneously present.     

A kinetic model for the molecular basis of the contractile activity of Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB

Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB are single-headed, monomeric molecules consisting of one heavy chain and one light chain. Both have high actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity, when the heavy chain is phosphorylated, but neither seems to be able to form the bipolar filaments that are generally thought to be required for actomyosin-dependent contractility. In this paper, we show that, at fixed F-actin concentration, the actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activities of myosins IA and IB increase about 5-fold in specific activity in a cooperative manner as the myosin concentration is increased. The myosin concentration range over which this cooperative change occurs depends on the actin concentration. More myosin I is required for the cooperative increase in activity at high concentrations of F-actin. The cooperative increase in specific activity at limiting actin concentrations is caused by a decrease in the KATPase for F-actin. The high and low KATPase states of the myosin have about the same Vmax at infinite actin concentration. Both myosins are completely bound to the F-actin long before the Vmax values are reached. Therefore, much of the actin activation must be the result of interactions between F-actin and actomyosin. These kinetic data can be explained by a model in which the cooperative shift of myosin I from the high KATPase to the low KATPase state results from the cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin I. Cross-linking might occur either through two actin-binding sites on a single molecule or by dimers or oligomers of myosin I induced to form by the interaction of myosin I monomers with the actin filaments. The ability of Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB to cross-link actin filaments is demonstrated in the accompanying paper (Fujisaki, H., Albanesi, J.P., and Korn, E.D. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11183-11189).