CstF-64 and 3′-UTR cis-element determine Star-PAP specificity for target mRNA selection by excluding PAPα

Almost all eukaryotic mRNAs have a poly (A) tail at the 3′-end. Canonical PAPs (PAPα/γ) polyadenylate nuclear pre-mRNAs. The recent identification of the non-canonical Star-PAP revealed specificity of nuclear PAPs for pre-mRNAs, yet the mechanism how Star-PAP selects mRNA targets is still elusive. Moreover, how Star-PAP target mRNAs having canonical AAUAAA signal are not regulated by PAPα is unclear. We investigate specificity mechanisms of Star-PAP that selects pre-mRNA targets for polyadenylation. Star-PAP assembles distinct 3′-end processing complex and controls pre-mRNAs independent of PAPα. We identified a Star-PAP recognition nucleotide motif and showed that suboptimal DSE on Star-PAP target pre-mRNA 3′-UTRs inhibit CstF-64 binding, thus preventing PAPα recruitment onto it. Altering 3′-UTR cis-elements on a Star-PAP target pre-mRNA can switch the regulatory PAP from Star-PAP to PAPα. Our results suggest a mechanism of poly (A) site selection that has potential implication on the regulation of alternative polyadenylation.     

Kinetics and regulation of site-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of human IGF-II mRNAs

Human insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA can be cleaved at a specific site in its 4 kb long 3′-UTR. This yields a stable 3′ cleavage product of 1.8 kb consisting of a 3′-UTR and a poly(A) tail and an unstable 5′ cleavage product containing the IGF-II coding region. After cleavage, the 5′ cleavage product is targeted to rapid degradation and consequently is no longer involved in IGF-II protein synthesis. Cleavage is therefore thought to provide an additional way to control IGF-II gene expression. In this paper the kinetics and the efficiency of cleavage of IGF-II mRNAs are examined. The cleavage efficiency of IGF-II mRNAs carrying four different leaders (L1–L4) is enhanced in the highly structured leaders L1 and L3. Additionally, under standard cell culture conditions cleavage is a slow process that only plays a limited role in destabilisation and translation of the IGF-II mRNAs. However, in human Hep3B cells and CaCo2 cells which express IGF-II endogenously, cleavage is upregulated 3–5-fold at high cell densities. Regulated endonucleolytic cleavage of IGF-II mRNAs is restricted to cells in which IGF-II expression is related to specific cell processes.     

Alternative 3′-end processing of long noncoding RNA initiates construction of nuclear paraspeckles

Paraspeckles are unique subnuclear structures built around a specific long noncoding RNA, NEAT1, which is comprised of two isoforms produced by alternative 3′-end processing (NEAT1_1 and NEAT1_2). To address the precise molecular processes that lead to paraspeckle formation, we identified 35 paraspeckle proteins (PSPs), mainly by colocalization screening with a fluorescent protein-tagged full-length cDNA library. Most of the newly identified PSPs possessed various putative RNA-binding domains. Subsequent RNAi analyses identified seven essential PSPs for paraspeckle formation. One of the essential PSPs, HNRNPK, appeared to affect the production of the essential NEAT1_2 isoform by negatively regulating the 3′-end polyadenylation of the NEAT1_1 isoform. An in vitro 3′-end processing assay revealed that HNRNPK arrested binding of the CPSF6–NUDT21 (CFIm) complex in the vicinity of the alternative polyadenylation site of NEAT1_1. In vitro binding assays showed that HNRNPK competed with CPSF6 for binding to NUDT21, which was the underlying mechanism to arrest CFIm binding by HNRNPK. This HNRNPK function led to the preferential accumulation of NEAT1_2 and initiated paraspeckle construction with multiple PSPs.     

Genome level analysis of rice mRNA 3'-end processing signals and alternative polyadenylation

The position of a poly(A) site of eukaryotic mRNA is determined by sequence signals in pre-mRNA and a group of polyadenylation factors. To reveal rice poly(A) signals at a genome level, we constructed a dataset of 55 742 authenticated poly(A) sites and characterized the poly(A) signals. This resulted in identifying the typical tripartite cis-elements, including FUE, NUE and CE, as previously observed in Arabidopsis. The average size of the 3′-UTR was 289 nucleotides. When mapped to the genome, however, 15% of these poly(A) sites were found to be located in the currently annotated intergenic regions. Moreover, an extensive alternative polyadenylation profile was evident where 50% of the genes analyzed had more than one unique poly(A) site (excluding microheterogeneity sites), and 13% had four or more poly(A) sites. About 4% of the analyzed genes possessed alternative poly(A) sites at their introns, 5′-UTRs, or protein coding regions. The authenticity of these alternative poly(A) sites was partially confirmed using MPSS data. Analysis of nucleotide profile and signal patterns indicated that there may be a different set of poly(A) signals for those poly(A) sites found in the coding regions. Based on the features of rice poly(A) signals, an updated algorithm termed PASS-Rice was designed to predict poly(A) sites.     

Systematic variation in mRNA 3'-processing signals during mouse spermatogenesis

Gene expression and processing during mouse male germ cell maturation (spermatogenesis) is highly specialized. Previous reports have suggested that there is a high incidence of alternative 3′-processing in male germ cell mRNAs, including reduced usage of the canonical polyadenylation signal, AAUAAA. We used EST libraries generated from mouse testicular cells to identify 3′-processing sites used at various stages of spermatogenesis (spermatogonia, spermatocytes and round spermatids) and testicular somatic Sertoli cells. We assessed differences in 3′-processing characteristics in the testicular samples, compared to control sets of widely used 3′-processing sites. Using a new method for comparison of degenerate regulatory elements between sequence samples, we identified significant changes in the use of putative 3′-processing regulatory sequence elements in all spermatogenic cell types. In addition, we observed a trend towards truncated 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTRs), with the most significant differences apparent in round spermatids. In contrast, Sertoli cells displayed a much smaller trend towards 3′-UTR truncation and no significant difference in 3′-processing regulatory sequences. Finally, we identified a number of genes encoding mRNAs that were specifically subject to alternative 3′-processing during meiosis and postmeiotic development. Our results highlight developmental differences in polyadenylation site choice and in the elements that likely control them during spermatogenesis.     

Estrogen-induced upregulation and 3′-UTR shortening of CDC6

3′-Untranslated region (UTR) shortening of mRNAs via alternative polyadenylation (APA) has important ramifications for gene expression. By using proximal APA sites and switching to shorter 3′-UTRs, proliferating cells avoid miRNA-mediated repression. Such APA and 3′-UTR shortening events may explain the basis of some of the proto-oncogene activation cases observed in cancer cells. In this study, we investigated whether 17 β-estradiol (E2), a potent proliferation signal, induces APA and 3′-UTR shortening to activate proto-oncogenes in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers. Our initial probe based screen of independent expression arrays suggested upregulation and 3′-UTR shortening of an essential regulator of DNA replication, CDC6 (cell division cycle 6), upon E2 treatment. We further confirmed the E2- and ER-dependent upregulation and 3′UTR shortening of CDC6, which lead to increased CDC6 protein levels and higher BrdU incorporation. Consequently, miRNA binding predictions and dual luciferase assays suggested that 3′-UTR shortening of CDC6 was a mechanism to avoid 3′-UTR-dependent negative regulations. Hence, we demonstrated CDC6 APA induction by the proliferative effect of E2 in ER+ cells and provided new insights into the complex regulation of APA. E2-induced APA is likely to be an important but previously overlooked mechanism of E2-responsive gene expression.     

U1A Regulates 3′ Processing of the Survival Motor Neuron mRNA

Insufficient expression of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein causes spinal muscular atrophy, a neurodegenerative disease characterized by loss of motor neurons. Despite the importance of maintaining adequate SMN levels, little is known about factors that control SMN expression, particularly 3′ end processing of the SMN pre-mRNA. In this study, we identify the U1A protein as a key regulator of SMN expression. U1A, a component of the U1 snRNP, is known to inhibit polyadenylation upon direct binding to mRNA. We show that U1A binds directly and with high affinity and specificity to the SMN 3′-UTR adjacent to the polyadenylation site, independent of the U1 snRNP (U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein). Binding of U1A inhibits polyadenylation of the SMN pre-mRNA by specifically inhibiting 3′ cleavage by the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor. Expression of U1A in excess of U1 snRNA causes inhibition of SMN polyadenylation and decreases SMN protein levels. This work reveals a new mechanism for regulating SMN levels and provides new insight into the roles of U1A in 3′ processing of mRNAs.     

Multiple elements required for translation of plastid atpB mRNA lacking the Shine-Dalgarno sequence

The mechanism of translational initiation differs between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Prokaryotic mRNAs generally contain within their 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence that serves as a ribosome-binding site. Chloroplasts possess prokaryotic-like translation machinery, and many chloroplast mRNAs have an SD-like sequence, but its position is variable. Tobacco chloroplast atpB mRNAs contain no SD-like sequence and are U-rich in the 5′-UTR (−20 to −1 with respect to the start codon). In vitro translation assays with mutated mRNAs revealed that an unstructured sequence encompassing the start codon, the AUG codon and its context are required for translation. UV crosslinking experiments showed that a 50 kDa protein (p50) binds to the 5′-UTR. Insertion of an additional initiation region (SD-sequence and AUG) in the 5′-UTR, but not downstream, arrested translation from the authentic site; however, no inhibition was observed by inserting only an AUG triplet. We hypothesize for translational initiation of the atpB mRNA that the ribosome enters an upstream region, slides to the start codon and forms an initiation complex with p50 and other components.     

Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation by U1 snRNPs and SRp20

Although considerable information is currently available about the factors involved in constitutive vertebrate polyadenylation, the factors and mechanisms involved in facilitating communication between polyadenylation and splicing are largely unknown. Even less is known about the regulation of polyadenylation in genes in which 3′-terminal exons are alternatively recognized. Here we demonstrate that an SR protein, SRp20, affects recognition of an alternative 3′-terminal exon via an effect on the efficiency of binding of a polyadenylation factor to an alternative polyadenylation site. The gene under study codes for the peptides calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide. Its pre-mRNA is alternatively processed by the tissue-specific inclusion or exclusion of an embedded 3′-terminal exon, exon 4, via factors binding to an intronic enhancer element that contains both 3′ and 5′ splice site consensus sequence elements. In cell types that preferentially exclude exon 4, addition of wild-type SRp20 enhances exon 4 inclusion via recognition of the intronic enhancer. In contrast, in cell types that preferentially include exon 4, addition of a mutant form of SRp20 containing the RNA-binding domain but missing the SR domain inhibits exon 4 inclusion. Inhibition is likely at the level of polyadenylation, because the mutant SRp20 inhibits binding of CstF to the exon 4 poly(A) site. This is the first demonstration that an SR protein can influence alternative polyadenylation and suggests that this family of proteins may play a role in recognition of 3′-terminal exons and perhaps in the communication between polyadenylation and splicing.