Mutations in tar suppress defects in maltose chemotaxis caused by specific malE mutations.

Maltose-binding protein (MBP), which is encoded by the malE gene, is the maltose chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli, as well as an essential component of the maltose uptake system. Maltose-loaded MBP is thought to initiate a chemotactic response by binding to the tar gene product, the signal transducer Tar, which is also the aspartate chemoreceptor. To study the interaction of MBP with Tar, we selected 14 malE mutants which had specific defects in maltose taxis. Three of these mutants were fully active in maltose transport and produced MBP in normal amounts. The isoelectric points of the MBPs from these three mutants were identical to (malE461 and malE469) or only 0.1 pH unit more basic than (malE454) the isoelectric point of the wild-type protein (pH 5.0). Six of the mutations, including malE454, malE461, and malE469, were mapped in detail; they were located in two regions within malE. We also isolated second-site suppressor mutations in the tar gene that restored maltose taxis in combination with the closely linked malE454 and malE461 mutations but not with the malE469 mutation, which maps in a different part of the gene. This allele-specific suppression confirmed that MBP and Tar interact directly.     

A mechanism for simultaneous sensing of aspartate and maltose by the Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli

The Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli exhibits partial sensory additivity. Tar can mediate simultaneous responses to two disparate ligands, aspartate and substrate-loaded maltose-binding protein (MBP). To investigate how one receptor generates concurrent signals to two stimuli, ligand-binding asymmetry was imposed on the rotationally symmetric Tar homodimer. Mutations causing specific defects in aspartate or maltose chemotaxis were introduced pairwise into plasmid-borne tar genes. The doubly mutated tar genes did not restore aspartate or maltose chemotaxis in a strain containing a chromosomal deletion of tar (Δ tar ). However, when Tar proteins with complementing sets of mutations were co-expressed from compatible plasmids, the resulting heterodimeric receptors enabled Δ tar cells to respond to aspartate or maltose. The effect of one attractant on the response to the other depended on the relative orientations of the functional binding sites for aspartate and MBP. When the sites were in the 'same' orientation, saturating levels of one attractant strongly inhibited chemotaxis to the other. In the 'opposite' orientation, such inhibitory effects were negligible. These data demonstrate that opposing subunits of Tar can transmit signals to aspartate and maltose independently if the ligands are restricted to the 'opposite' binding orientation. When aspartate and MBP bind in the 'same' orientation, they compete for signalling through one subunit. In the wild-type Tar dimer, aspartate and MBP can bind in either the 'same' or the 'opposite' orientation, a freedom that can explain the partial additivity of the aspartate and maltose responses that is seen with tar ⁺ cells.     

Aspartate taxis mutants of the Escherichia coli tar chemoreceptor.

The Tar protein of Escherichia coli belongs to a family of methyl-accepting inner membrane proteins that mediate chemotactic responses to a variety of compounds. These transmembrane signalers monitor the chemical environment by means of specific ligand-binding sites arrayed on the periplasmic side of the membrane, and in turn control cytoplasmic signals that modulate the flagellar rotational machinery. The periplasmic receptor domain of Tar senses two quite different chemoeffectors, aspartate and maltose. Aspartate is detected through direct binding to Tar molecules, whereas maltose is detected indirectly when complexed with the periplasmic maltose-binding protein. Saturating levels of either aspartate or maltose do not block behavioral responses to the other compound, indicating that the detection sites for these two attractants are not identical. We initiated structure-function studies of these chemoreceptor sites by isolating tar mutants which eliminate aspartate or maltose taxis, while retaining the ability to respond to the other chemoeffector. Mutants with greatly reduced aspartate taxis are described and characterized in this report. When present in single copy in the chromosome, these tar mutations generally eliminated chemotactic responses to aspartate and structurally related compounds, such as glutamate and methionine. Residual responses to these compounds were shifted to higher concentrations, indicating a reduced affinity of the aspartate-binding site in the mutant receptors. Maltose responses in the mutants ranged from 10 to 80% of normal, but had no detectable threshold shifts, indicating that these receptor alterations may have little effect on maltose detection sensitivity. The mutational changes in 17 mutants were determined by DNA sequence analysis. Each mutant exhibited a single amino acid replacement at residue 64, 69, or 73 in the Tar molecule. The wild-type Tar transducer contains arginines at all three of these positions, implying that electrostatic forces may play an important role in aspartate detection.     

Aspartate and maltose-binding protein interact with adjacent sites in the Tar chemotactic signal transducer of Escherichia coli.

The Tar protein of Escherichia coli is a chemotactic signal transducer that spans the cytoplasmic membrane and mediates responses to the attractants aspartate and maltose. Aspartate binds directly to Tar, whereas maltose binds to the periplasmic maltose-binding protein, which then interacts with Tar. The Arg-64, Arg-69, and Arg-73 residues of Tar have previously been shown to be involved in aspartate sensing. When lysine residues are introduced at these positions by site-directed mutagenesis, aspartate taxis is disrupted most by substitution at position 64, and maltose taxis is disrupted most by substitution at position 73. To explore the spatial distribution of ligand recognition sites on Tar further, we performed doped-primer mutagenesis in selected regions of the tar gene. A number of mutations that interfere specifically with aspartate taxis (Asp-), maltose taxis (Mal-), or both were identified. Mutations affecting residues 64 to 73 or 149 to 154 in the periplasmic domain of Tar are associated with an Asp- phenotype, whereas mutations affecting residues 73 to 83 or 141 to 150 are associated with a Mal- phenotype. We conclude that aspartate and maltose-binding protein interact with adjacent and partially overlapping regions in the periplasmic domain of Tar to initiate attractant signalling.     

Role of threonine residue 154 in ligand recognition of the tar chemoreceptor in Escherichia coli.

The Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli mediates attractant responses to aspartate, maltose, and phenol, repellent responses to Ni2+ and Co2+, and thermoresponses. To understand the role of threonine residue 154, which is located in the ligand-binding domain of Tar, we replaced the residue with serine, isoleucine, and proline by site-directed mutagenesis. The replacements caused reductions in aspartate sensing but had only a small effect on maltose sensing and almost no effect on phenol sensing, repellent sensing, and thermosensing. These results indicate that Thr-154 of Tar is rather specifically involved in aspartate sensing. The reductions in the response threshold for aspartate by the replacements with serine, isoleucine, and proline were less than 1, about 2, and more than 5 orders of magnitude, respectively. When the corresponding threonine residue in the Tsr chemoreceptor was replaced with the same amino acids, roughly similar reductions in the response threshold for serine resulted. Thus, these threonine residues seem to have a common role in detecting the aspartate and serine attractant families. A mechanism by which these chemoreceptors detect the amino acid attractants is discussed.     

Maltose-binding protein interacts simultaneously and asymmetrically with both subunits of the Tar chemoreceptor

The Tar chemotactic signal transducer of Escherichia coli mediates attractant responses to L-aspartate and to maltose. Aspartate binds across the subunit interface of the periplasmic receptor domain of a Tar homodimer. Maltose, in contrast, first binds to the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP), which in its ligand-stabilized closed form then interacts with Tar. Intragenic complementation was used to determine the MBP-binding site on the Tar dimer. Mutations causing certain substitutions at residues Tyr-143, Asn-145, Gly-147, Tyr-149, and Phe-150 of Tar lead to severe defects in maltose chemotaxis, as do certain mutations affecting residues Arg-73, Met-76, Asp-77, and Ser-83. These two sets of mutations defined two complementation groups when the defective proteins were co-expressed at equal levels from compatible plasmids. We conclude that MBP contacts both subunits of the Tar dimer simultaneously and asymmetrically. Mutations affecting Met-75 could not be complemented, suggesting that this residue is important for association of MBP with each subunit of the Tar dimer. When the residues involved in interaction with MBP were mapped onto the crystal structure of the Tar periplasmic domain, they localized to a groove at the membrane-distal apex of the domain and also extended onto one shoulder of the apical region.     

Maltose chemotaxis involves residues in the N-terminal and C-terminal domains on the same face of maltose-binding protein.

The periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) of Escherichia coli is the recognition component of the maltose chemoreceptor and of the active transport system for maltose. It interacts with the Tar chemotactic signal transducer and the integral cytoplasmic-membrane components (the MalF and MalG proteins) of the maltose transport system. Maltose binds in a cleft between the globular N-terminal and C-terminal domains of MBP, which are connected by a moveable hinge. The two domains undergo a large motion relative to one another as the protein moves from the open, unbound state to the closed, ligand-bound state. We generated, by doped-primer mutagenesis, amino acid substitutions that specifically disrupt the chemotactic function of MBP. These substitutions cluster in two well-defined regions that are nearly contiguous on the surface of MBP in its closed conformation. One region is in the N-terminal domain and one is in the C-terminal domain. The distance between the two regions is expected to change substantially as the protein goes from the open to the closed form. These results support a model in which ligand binding brings two recognition sites on MBP into the proper spatial relationship to interact with complementary sites on Tar. Mutations in MBP that appear to cause defects in interaction with MalF and MalG are distributed differently from mutations that primarily affect maltose taxis. We conclude that the regions of MBP that contact Tar and those that contact MalF and MalG are adjacent on the face of the protein opposite the hinge connecting the two domains and that those regions are largely, although perhaps not entirely, distinct.     

Dependence of maltose transport and chemotaxis on the amount of maltose-binding protein

Maltose-binding protein (MBP) is essential for maltose transport and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. To perform these functions it must interact with two sets of cytoplasmic membrane proteins, the MalFGK transport complex and the chemotactic signal transducer Tar. MBP is present at high concentrations, on the order of 1 mM, in the periplasm of maltose-induced or malTc constitutive cells. To determine how the amount of MBP affects transport and taxis, we utilized a series of malE signal-sequence mutations that interfere with export of MBP. The MBP content in shock fluid from cells carrying the various mutations ranged from 4 to 23% of the malE+ level. The apparent Km for maltose transport varied by less than a factor of 2 among malE+ and mutant strains. At a saturating maltose concentration 9% (approximately 90 microM) of the malE+ amount of MBP was required for half-maximal uptake rates. Transport exhibited a sigmoidal dependence on the amount of periplasmic MBP, indicating that MBP may be involved in a cooperative interaction at some stage of the transport process. The chemotactic response to a saturating maltose stimulus exhibited a first-order dependence on the amount of periplasmic MBP. Thus, interaction of a single substrate-bound MBP with Tar appears sufficient to initiate a chemotactic signal from the transducer. A half-maximal chemotactic response occurred at 25% of the malE+ MBP level, suggesting that in vivo the KD for binding of maltose-loaded MBP to Tar is quite high (approximately 250 microM).     

Interspecific reconstitution of maltose transport and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli with maltose-binding protein from various enteric bacteria.

In Escherichia coli, the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP), the product of the malE gene, is the primary recognition component of the transport system for maltose and maltodextrins. It is also the maltose chemoreceptor, in which capacity it interacts with the signal transducer Tar (taxis to aspartate and some repellents). In studies of the maltose system in other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, we found that MBP is produced by Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Serratia marcescens. MBP from all of these species cross-reacted with antibody against the E. coli protein and had a similar molecular weight (about 40,000). The Shigella flexneri and Proteus mirabilis strains we examined did not synthesize MBP. The isoelectric points of MBP from different species varied from the acid extreme of E. coli (4.8) to the basic extreme of E. aerogenes (8.9). All species with MBP transported maltose with high affinity, although the Vmax for K. pneumoniae was severalfold lower than that for the other species. Maltose chemotaxis was observed only in E. coli and E. aerogenes. In S. typhimurium LT2, Tar was completely inactive in maltose taxis, although it signaled normally in response to aspartate. MBP isolated from all five species could be used to reconstitute maltose transport and taxis in a delta malE strain of E. coli after permeabilization of the outer membrane with calcium.     

The residue composition of the aromatic anchor of the second transmembrane helix determines the signaling properties of the aspartate/maltose chemoreceptor Tar of Escherichia coli

Repositioning of the tandem aromatic residues (Trp-209 and Tyr-210) at the cytoplasmic end of the second transmembrane helix (TM2) modulates the signal output of the aspartate/maltose chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli (Tar(Ec)). Here, we directly assessed the effect of the residue composition of the aromatic anchor by studying the function of a library of Tar(Ec) variants that possess all possible combinations of Ala, Phe, Tyr, and Trp at positions 209 and 210. We identified three important properties of the aromatic anchor. First, a Trp residue at position 209 was required to maintain clockwise (CW) signal output in the absence of adaptive methylation, but adaptive methylation restored the ability of all of the mutant receptors to generate CW rotation. Second, when the aromatic anchor was replaced with tandem Ala residues, signaling was less compromised than when an Ala residue occupied position 209 and an aromatic residue occupied position 210. Finally, when Trp was present at position 209, the identity of the residue at position 210 had little effect on baseline signal output or aspartate chemotaxis, although maltose taxis was significantly affected by some substitutions at position 210. All of the mutant receptors we constructed supported some level of aspartate and maltose taxis in semisolid agar swim plates, but those without Trp at position 209 were overmethylated in their baseline signaling state. These results show the importance of the cytoplasmic aromatic anchor of TM2 in maintaining the baseline Tar(Ec) signal output and responsiveness to attractant signaling.     

Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: organization of the tar region.

The tar locus of Escherichia coli specifies one of the major species of methyl-accepting proteins involved in the chemotactic behavior of this organism. The physical and genetic organization of the tar region was investigated with a series of specialized lambda transducing phages and plasmid clones. The tar gene was mapped at the promoter-proximal end of an operon containing five other chemotaxis-related loci. Four of those genes (cheR, cheB, cheY and cheZ) are required for all chemotactic responses; consequently, polar mutations in the tar gene resulted in a generally nonchemotactic phenotype. The fifth gene, tap, was mapped between the tar and cheR loci and specified the production of a 65-kilodalton methyl-accepting protein. Unlike the tar locus, which is required for chemotaxis to aspartate and maltose, mutants lacking only the tap function had no obvious defects in chemotactic ability. Genetic and physical maps of the tar-tap region were constructed with Mu d1 (Apr lac) insertion mutations, whose polar properties conferred a phenotype suitable for deletion mapping studies. Restriction endonuclease analyses of phage and plasmid clones indicated that all of the genetic coding capacity in the tar region is now accounted for.     

Genetic approach to the role of tryptophan residues in the activities and fluorescence of a bacterial periplasmic maltose-binding protein

The periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP or MalE protein) of Escherichia coli is an essential element in the transport of maltose and maltodextrins and in the chemotaxis towards these sugars. On the basis of previous results suggesting their possible role in the activity and fluorescence of MBP, we have changed independently to alanine each of the eight tryptophan residues as well as asparagine 294, which is conserved among four periplasmic sugar-binding proteins. Five of the tryptophan mutations affected activity. In four cases (substitution of Trp62, Trp230, Trp232 and Trp340), there was a decrease in MBP affinity towards maltose correlated with modifications in transport and chemotaxis. According to the present state of the 2.3 A three-dimensional structure of MBP, all four residues are in the binding site. Residues Trp62 and Trp340 are in the immediate vicinity of the bound substrate and appear to have direct contacts with maltose; this is in agreement with the drastic increases in Kd values (respectively 67 and 300-fold) upon their substitution by alanine residues. The modest increase in Kd (12-fold) observed upon mutation of Trp230 would be compatible with the lesser degree of interaction this residue has with the bound substrate and the idea that it plays an indirect role, presumably by keeping other residues involved directly in binding in their proper orientation. Substitution of Trp232 resulted in a small increase in Kd value (2-fold) in spite of the fact that this residue is the closest to the ligand of the tryptophan residues according to the three-dimensional model. In the fifth case, replacement of Trp158, which is distant from the binding site, strongly reduced the chemotactic response towards maltose without affecting the transport parameters or the sugar-binding activities of the mutant protein. Trp158 may therefore be specifically implicated in the interaction of MBP with the chemotransducer Tar, but this effect is likely to be indirect, since Trp158 is buried in the structure of MBP. Of course, some structural rearrangements could be responsible in part for the effects of these mutations. The remaining four mutations were silent. The corresponding residues (Trp10, Trp94, Trp129 and Asn294) are all distant from the sugar-binding site on the crystallographic model of MBP, which is in agreement with their lack of effect on binding. In addition, our results show that they play no role in the interactions with the other proteins of the maltose transport (MalF, MalG or MalK) or chemotaxis (Tar) systems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Mutations that affect ligand binding to the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor: implications for transmembrane signaling

Three arginine residues of the binding site of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor contribute to its high affinity for aspartate (K(d) approximately 3 microm). Site-directed mutations at residue 64 had the greatest effect on aspartate binding. No residue could substitute for the native arginine; all changes resulted in an apparent K(d) of approximately 35 mm. These mutations had little impact on maltose responses. At residue Arg-69, a lysine substitution was least disruptive, conferring an apparent K(d) of 0.3 mm for aspartate. Results obtained for an alanine mutant were similar to those with cysteine and histidine mutants (K(d) approximately 5 mm) indicating that side chain size was not an important factor here. Proline and aspartate caused more severe defects, presumably for reasons related to conformation and charge. The impact of residue 69 mutations on the maltose response was small. Mutations at Arg-73 had similar effects on aspartate binding (K(d) 0.3-7 mm) but more severe consequences for maltose responses. Larger side chains resulted in the best aspartate binding, implying steric considerations are important here. Signaling in the mutant proteins was surprisingly robust. Given aspartate binding, signaling occurred with essentially wild-type efficiency. These results were evaluated in the context of available structural data.     

Mutations in the aspartate receptor of Escherichia coli which affect aspartate binding

The effects of five mutations at arginines 64, 69, and 73 of the Tar protein were analyzed using swarm assays, aspartate binding in purified membranes, and methylation both in vitro and in vivo. The defects in the responses of these mutant receptors to aspartate were shown to be directly attributable to reduced binding of aspartate to the receptor rather than to defects in their signaling characteristics. Mutations at residues 64, 69, and 73 reduced aspartate binding by factors of greater than 10(-4), 10(-3), and 10(-2), respectively. Once aspartate was bound, the mutants exhibited normal signaling properties. No cooperativity was observed in the coupling of aspartate binding to methylation, indicating that the monomers of the receptor dimer act independently. The in vitro methylation system was thus shown to be an effective way of measuring aspartate binding constants and examining the functional integrity of the proteins. The maltose responses of the receptor proteins were affected slightly, or not at all, in an in vivo methylation assay. Two models for the roles of these arginine residues in receptor function are discussed.     

Progress in the identification of interaction sites on the periplasmic maltose binding protein from E coli

The periplasmic maltose binding protein (MBP) is required for the high affinity transport of maltose and maltodextrins and for chemotaxis towards these sugars. In these functions, MBP interacts with proteins of the cytoplasmic membrane: MalF and MalG for transport, Tar for chemotaxis. A large number of MBP mutations have been isolated by us and other laboratories. We grouped these mutations into classes depending on the interactions affected and we represented the corresponding residues on the 3-D model for MBP so as to further identify the sites of MBP interacting with the MalF-MalG complex and with the Tar protein. MBP (like the other binding proteins) is composed of 2 lobes enclosing a cleft where the substrate binds. The face of the protein opposite the cleft seems to interact neither with MalF-MalG nor with Tar. The other face, corresponding to the cleft, contains sites for interactions with MalF-MalG and Tar. These sites appear to cover both sides of the cleft and may overlap in part. The present definition of the interaction sites suggests further that MBP has different in vivo orientations when it interacts with MalF-MalG or with Tar. This work constitutes an additional step in combining the use of genetic and structural analysis to define the interaction sites on MBP. Because of the structural similarities between periplasmic binding proteins, the regions of interaction defined could be relevant for other members of this family.     

Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: null phenotypes of the tar and tap genes.

The tar and tap genes are located adjacent to one another in an operon of chemotaxis-related functions. They encode methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins implicated in tactic responses to aspartate and maltose stimuli. The functional roles of these two gene products were investigated by isolating and characterizing nonpolar, single-gene deletion mutants at each locus. Deletions were obtained by selecting for loss or a defective Mu d1 prophage inserted in either the tar or tap gene. The extent of the tar deletions was determined by genetic mapping with Southern hybridization. Representative deletion mutants were surveyed for chemotactic responses on semisolid agar and by temporal stimulation in a tethered cell assay to assess flagellar rotational responses to chemoeffector compounds. The tar deletion strains exhibited complete loss of aspartate and maltose responses, whereas the tap deletion strains displayed a wild-type phenotype under all conditions tested. These findings indicate that the tap function is unable to promote chemotactic responses to aspartate and maltose, and its role in chemotaxis remains unclear.     

Hybrid Escherichia coli sensory transducers with altered stimulus detection and signaling properties.

The tar and tap loci of Escherichia coli encode methyl-accepting inner membrane proteins that mediate chemotactic responses to aspartate and maltose or to dipeptides. These genes lie adjacent to each other in the same orientation on the chromosome and have extensive sequence homology throughout the C-terminal portions of their coding regions. Many spontaneous deletions in the tar-tap region appear to be generated by recombination between these regions of homology, leading to gene fusions that produce hybrid transducer molecules in which the N terminus of Tar is joined to the C terminus of Tap. The properties of two such hybrids are described in this report. Although Tar and Tap molecules have homologous domain structures, these Tar-Tap hybrids exhibited defects in stimulus detection and flagellar signaling. Both hybrid transducers retained Tar receptor specificity, but had reduced detection sensitivity. This defect was correlated with the presence of the C-terminal methyl-accepting segment of Tap, which may have more methylation sites than its Tar counterpart, leading to elevated steady-state methylation levels in the hybrid molecules. One of the hybrids, which carried a more extensive segment from Tap, appeared to generate constitutive signals that locked the flagellar motors in a counterclockwise rotational mode. Changes in the methylation state of this transducer were ineffective in cancelling this aberrant signal. These findings implicate the conserved C-terminal domain of bacterial transducers in the generation or regulation of flagellar signals.     

Pleiotropic aspartate taxis and serine taxis mutants of Escherichia coli.

Mutants that at one time were thought to be specifically defective in taxis toward aspartate and related amino acids (tar mutants) or specifically defective in taxis toward serine and related amino acids (tar mutants) are now shown to be pleiotropic in their defects. The tar mutants also lack taxis toward maltose and away from Co2+ and Ni2+. The tsr mutants are altered in their response to a variety of repellents. Double mutants (tar tsr) fail in nearly all chemotactic responses. The tar and tsr mutants provide evidence for two complementary, converging pathways of information flow: certain chemoreceptors feed information into the tar pathway and others into the tsr pathway. The tar and tsr products have been shown to be two different sets of methylated proteins.     

Mutational analysis of N381, a key trimer contact residue in Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor

Chemoreceptors such as Tsr, the serine receptor, function in trimer-of-dimer associations to mediate chemotactic behavior in Escherichia coli. The two subunits of each receptor homodimer occupy different positions in the trimer, one at its central axis and the other at the trimer periphery. Residue N381 of Tsr contributes to trimer stability through interactions with its counterparts in a central cavity surrounded by hydrophobic residues at the trimer axis. To assess the functional role of N381, we created and characterized a full set of amino acid replacements at this Tsr residue. We found that every amino acid replacement at N381 destroyed Tsr function, and all but one (N381G) of the mutant receptors also blocked signaling by Tar, the aspartate chemoreceptor. Tar jamming reflects the formation of signaling-defective mixed trimers of dimers, and in vivo assays with a trifunctional cross-linking reagent demonstrated trimer-based interactions between Tar and Tsr-N381 mutants. Mutant Tsr molecules with a charged amino acid or proline replacement exhibited the most severe trimer formation defects. These trimer-defective receptors, as well as most of the trimer-competent mutant receptors, were unable to form ternary signaling complexes with the CheA kinase and with CheW, which couples CheA to receptor control. Some of the trimer-competent mutant receptors, particularly those with a hydrophobic amino acid replacement, may not bind CheW/CheA because they form conformationally frozen or distorted trimers. These findings indicate that trimer dynamics probably are important for ternary complex assembly and that N381 may not be a direct binding determinant for CheW/CheA at the trimer periphery.     

Stabilization of polar localization of a chemoreceptor via its covalent modifications and its communication with a different chemoreceptor

In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, polar clustering of the chemoreceptors, the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW is thought to be involved in signal amplification and adaptation. However, the mechanism that leads to the polar localization of the receptor is still largely unknown. In this study, we examined the effect of receptor covalent modification on the polar localization of the aspartate chemoreceptor Tar fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP). Amidation (and presumably methylation) of Tar-GFP enhanced its own polar localization, although the effect was small. The slight but significant effect of amidation on receptor localization was reinforced by the fact that localization of a noncatalytic mutant version of GFP-CheR that targets to the C-terminal pentapeptide sequence of Tar was similarly facilitated by receptor amidation. Polar localization of the demethylated version of Tar-GFP was also enhanced by increasing levels of the serine chemoreceptor Tsr. The effect of covalent modification on receptor localization by itself may be too small to account for chemotactic adaptation, but receptor modification is suggested to contribute to the molecular assembly of the chemoreceptor/histidine kinase array at a cell pole, presumably by stabilizing the receptor dimer-to-dimer interaction.