Queuosine Formation in Eukaryotic tRNA Occurs via a Mitochondria-localized Heteromeric Transglycosylase

tRNA guanine transglycosylase (TGT) enzymes are responsible for the formation of queuosine in the anticodon loop (position 34) of tRNA^Asp, tRNA^Asn, tRNA^His, and tRNA^Tyr; an almost universal event in eubacterial and eukaryotic species. Despite extensive characterization of the eubacterial TGT the eukaryotic activity has remained undefined. Our search of mouse EST and cDNA data bases identified a homologue of the Escherichia coli TGT and three spliced variants of the queuine tRNA guanine transglycosylase domain containing 1 (QTRTD1) gene. QTRTD1 variant_1 (Qv1) was found to be the predominant adult form. Functional cooperativity of TGT and Qv1 was suggested by their coordinate mRNA expression in Northern blots and from their association in vivo by immunoprecipitation. Neither TGT nor Qv1 alone could complement a tgt mutation in E. coli. However, transglycosylase activity could be obtained when the proteins were combined in vitro. Confocal and immunoblot analysis suggest that TGT weakly interacts with the outer mitochondrial membrane possibly through association with Qv1, which was found to be stably associated with the organelle.Queuosine (Q³; (7-{[(4,5-cis-dihydroxy-2-cyclo-penten-1-yl)-amino]methyl}-7-deazaguanosine) is a modified 7-deazaguanosine molecule found at the wobble position of transfer RNA that contains a GUN anticodon sequence: tRNA^Tyr, tRNA^Asn, tRNA^His, and tRNA^Asp (1). The Q-modification is widely distributed in nature in the tRNA of eubacteria, plants, and animals; a notable exception being yeast and plant leaf cells (2, 3). Interestingly, Q-modification has also been detected in aspartyl tRNA from mitochondria of rat (4) and opossum (5). In most eukaryotes, the Q molecule can be further modified by the addition of a mannosyl group to Q-tRNA^Asp and a galactosyl group to Q-tRNA^Tyr (1).Eubacteria are unique in their ability to synthesize Q. As part of this biosynthetic process, the eubacterial tRNA guanine transglycosylase (TGT) enzyme inserts the Q precursor molecule, 7-aminomethyl-7-deazaguanine (preQ₁) into tRNA, which is then converted to Q by two further enzymatic steps at the tRNA level (6). Eukaryotes by contrast salvage queuosine from food and enteric bacteria either as the free base (referred to as queuine) or as queuosine 5′-phosphate subsequent to normal tRNA turnover (7). A Q-related molecule, archaeosine, is found at position 15 of the D loop of most archaeal tRNA, where it functions to stabilize the tRNA structure (8). The enzyme involved in archaeosine biosynthesis is structurally and mechanistically related to the eubacterial TGT but with adaptations necessitated by the differences imposed by its unique substrate and tRNA specificity (9, 10).The crystal structure of the Zymononas mobilis (Z. mobilis) TGT has been determined and revealed the enzyme to be an irregular (β/α)₈ TIM barrel with a C-terminal zinc-binding subdomain (11). Insight into the residues involved in catalysis came from mutational and kinetic analysis of the recombinant Escherichia coli enzyme (12) and from the Z. mobilis TGT structure as an RNA-bound intermediate complexed to the final preQ₁-modified RNA product (13). This work showed the essential role of Asp-280 (Z. mobilis numbering) as the active site nucleophile. Asp-102, which was originally ascribed the role of active site nucleophile, functions as a general acid/base during catalysis (12, 10). Although, the E. coli and Z. mobilis TGT enzymes are monomeric in solution (14), at high protein concentrations the E. coli enzyme can oligomerize (15), and structural data from the Z. mobilis TGT has shown the formation of a 2:1 complex with tRNA; a possible functional requirement for catalysis (10).In contrast to the eubacterial enzyme, which is a single protein species, purification of the eukaryotic TGT suggested that the catalytically active enzyme is a heterodimeric molecule: subunits of 60 and 43 kDa in rabbit erythrocytes (16), 66 and 32 kDa in bovine liver (17), 60 and 34.5 kDa in rat liver (18), and a homodimer of two 68-kDa proteins in wheat germ (16, 19). A partial amino acid sequence was recovered from two of these active enzyme preparations. The identity of the proteins from bovine liver (17) could not be assigned at the time of publication. However, our searches show that the peptides from the larger 65-kDa subunit are identical to asparaginyl tRNA synthetase, and those of the smaller 32-kDa subunit correspond to 2,4-dienoyl CoA reductase. A highly pure preparation from rabbit reticulocytes (20) gave peptides with homology to the immunophilin p59, human elongation factor 2 (EF2), and a deubiquitinating enzyme, USP14. It is noteworthy that none of the peptide sequences obtained showed similarity to the eubacterial TGT. The results do suggest, however, that in eukaryotes the TGT activity could be embedded in a multisubunit complex.Most recently, Deshpande and Katze (21) identified a cDNA clone encoding a putative TGT catalytic subunit. Cloning the cDNA into a mammalian expression plasmid reconstituted TGT activity in GC₃/c1 cells, which are known to be naturally deficient in Q-containing tRNA (22). In this study, we identify for the first time the composition of the eukaryotic tRNA guanine transglycosylase, reconstitute the catalytic activity in vitro, and examine the intracellular distribution of the active subunits.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Endosomal Trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and Genomic RNAs Regulates Viral Egress

HIV-1 Gag can assemble and generate virions at the plasma membrane, but it is also present in endosomes where its role remains incompletely characterized. Here, we show that HIV-1 RNAs and Gag are transported on endosomal vesicles positive for TiVamp, a v-SNARE involved in fusion events with the plasma membrane. Inhibition of endosomal traffic did not prevent viral release. However, inhibiting lysosomal degradation induced an accumulation of Gag in endosomes and increased viral production 7-fold, indicating that transport of Gag to lysosomes negatively regulates budding. This also suggested that endosomal Gag-RNA complexes could access retrograde pathways to the cell surface and indeed, depleting cells of TiVamp-reduced viral production. Moreover, inhibition of endosomal transport prevented the accumulation of Gag at sites of cellular contact. HIV-1 Gag could thus generate virions using two pathways, either directly from the plasma membrane or through an endosome-dependent route. Endosomal Gag-RNA complexes may be delivered at specific sites to facilitate cell-to-cell viral transmission.The production of infectious retroviral particles is an ordered process that includes many steps (for review see Refs. 1–3). In particular, three major viral components, Gag, the envelope, and genomic RNAs have to traffic inside the cell to reach their assembly site. Viral biogenesis is driven by the polyprotein Gag, which is able to make viral-like particles when expressed alone (4). Upon release, HIV-1⁴ Gag is processed by the viral protease into matrix (MA(p17)), capsid (CA(p24)), nucleocapsid (NC(p7)), p6, and smaller peptides SP1 and SP2. Gag contains several domains that are essential for viral assembly: a membrane binding domain (M) in MA; a Gag-Gag interaction domain in CA; an assembly domain (I) in NC; and a late domain (L) in p6, which recruits the cellular budding machinery. Genomic RNAs are specifically recognized by NC, and they play fundamental roles in viral biogenesis by acting as a scaffold for Gag multimerization (5).It has been demonstrated that retroviruses bud by hijacking the endosomal machinery that sorts proteins into internal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (for review, see Refs. 6, 7). Indeed, these vesicles bud with the same topology as viral particles. Proteins sorted into this pathway are usually destined for degradation in lysosomes, but some can also recycle to the plasma membrane (for review see Refs. 8, 9). They are also frequently ubiquitinated on their cytoplasmic domain (10, 11), allowing their recognition by ESCRT complexes. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I recognize ubiquitinated cargo present at the surface of endosomes and recruit other ESCRT complexes (12–14). ESCRT-III is believed to function directly in the formation of multivesicular body intralumenal vesicles (12), even though its mechanism of action is currently not understood. Remarkably, Gag L domains interact directly with components of the multivesicular body-sorting machinery (for review see Ref. 15). HIV-1 Gag uses a PTAP motif to bind Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I (16–19), and a YPLTSL motif to interact with Alix, a protein linked to ESCRT-I and -III (20–22). Finally, various ubiquitin ligases are also required directly or indirectly during HIV-1 biogenesis (23, 24; for review see Ref. 25).In many cell lines, Gag is found both at the plasma membrane and in endosomes. This has led to the hypothesis that there are several assembly sites for HIV-1 (1, 3). First, Gag can initiate and complete assembly at the plasma membrane. This is thought to occur predominantly in T lymphocytes, and this process is supported by several lines of evidences: (i) disruption of endosomal trafficking with drugs does not prevent viral production (26, 27); (ii) ESCRT complexes can be recruited at the plasma membrane, at sites where Gag accumulates (28–30); (iii) Gag can be seen multimerizing and budding from the plasma membrane in live cells (31). Second, Gag could initiate assembly in endosomes, and then traffic to the cell surface to be released. This is mainly supported by the presence of Gag in endosomes in several cell lines (32–34), including T cells and more strikingly macrophages (32, 35, 36–39). However, we are currently lacking functional experiments addressing the role of this endosomal pool of Gag, and it is still not clear to what extent it contributes to the production of viral particles. Nevertheless, the presence of Gag in endosomes might facilitate recruitment of ESCRT complexes (34, 40), packaging of viral genomic RNAs (32, 41), and incorporation of the envelope (42). It may also be important for polarized budding (43, 44) and to create a viral reservoir in infected cells (45, 46).Despite great progress, the traffic of HIV-1 components is still not fully elucidated. In particular, the transport of the genomic RNAs is poorly understood. In this study, we have used single molecule techniques to investigate the trafficking of HIV-1 RNAs in fixed and live cells, and we show that they are transported on endosomal vesicles. We also obtained functional evidence that Gag and viral RNAs can use at least two trafficking pathways to produce virions, one going directly from the plasma membrane and another one passing through endosomes.     

Dual Targeting of a tRNAAsp Requires Two Different Aspartyl-tRNA Synthetases in Trypanosoma brucei

The mitochondrion of the parasitic protozoon Trypanosoma brucei does not encode any tRNAs. This deficiency is compensated for by partial import of nearly all of its cytosolic tRNAs. Most trypanosomal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are encoded by single copy genes, suggesting the use of the same enzyme in the cytosol and in the mitochondrion. However, the T. brucei genome encodes two distinct genes for eukaryotic aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS), although the cell has a single tRNA^Asp isoacceptor only. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the two T. brucei AspRSs evolved from a duplication early in kinetoplastid evolution and also revealed that eight other major duplications of AspRS occurred in the eukaryotic domain. RNA interference analysis established that both Tb-AspRS1 and Tb-AspRS2 are essential for growth and required for cytosolic and mitochondrial Asp-tRNA^Asp formation, respectively. In vitro charging assays demonstrated that the mitochondrial Tb-AspRS2 aminoacylates both cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNA^Asp, whereas the cytosolic Tb-AspRS1 selectively recognizes cytosolic but not mitochondrial tRNA^Asp. This indicates that cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNA^Asp, although derived from the same nuclear gene, are physically different, most likely due to a mitochondria-specific nucleotide modification. Mitochondrial Tb-AspRS2 defines a novel group of eukaryotic AspRSs with an expanded substrate specificity that are restricted to trypanosomatids and therefore may be exploited as a novel drug target.In most animal and fungal mitochondria, the total set of tRNAs required for translation is encoded on the mitochondrial genome and thus of bacterial evolutionary origin. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs)² responsible for charging of mitochondrial tRNAs are always nuclear encoded and need to be imported into mitochondria. We therefore expect to find two sets of aaRSs, one for cytosolic aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis and a second one, of bacterial evolutionary origin, for aminoacylation of mitochondrial tRNAs (1, 2).In most cells, however, some aaRSs are targeted to both the cytosol as well as to mitochondria (3). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for example, four aaRSs are double-targeted to both compartments, indicating that they are able to aminoacylate tRNAs of both eukaryotic and bacterial evolutionary origin (4–6). In plants, the situation is more complex, since protein synthesis occurs in three compartments: the cytosol, the mitochondria, and the plastids. A recent analysis in Arabidopsis has shown that, rather than having three unique sets of aaRSs specific for the three translation systems, more than 15 aaRSs were dually targeted to the mitochondria and the plastid (7). Moreover, there is at least one aaRS that is shared between all three compartments. In summary, these examples indicate that the overlap between the different sets of aaRSs used in the various translation systems is variable and can be extensive.Most eukaryotes, except many animals and fungi, lack a variable number of mitochondrial tRNA genes. Mitochondrial translation in these organisms depends on import of a small fraction of the corresponding nucleus-encoded cytosolic tRNAs (8–10). As a consequence, imported tRNAs are always of eukaryotic evolutionary origin. An intriguing situation is found in trypanosomatids (such as Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania spp.), where all mitochondrial tRNA genes have apparently been lost and all mitochondrial tRNAs are imported from the cytosol. In these organisms, all mitochondrial tRNAs derive from cytosolic tRNAs (11). It is therefore reasonable to assume that trypanosomal aaRSs are dually targeted to the cytosol and the mitochondrion. For the T. brucei glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, the dual localization has been shown experimentally (12). Moreover, dual targeting of essentially all aaRSs is suggested by the fact that the genome of T. brucei and other trypanosomatids encodes only 23 distinct aaRSs, fewer than any other eukaryote that has a mitochondrial translation system (13). Unexpectedly, two distinct genes were found for the tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS), the lysyl-tRNA synthetase and the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS). A recent study has shown that the two trypanosomal TrpRSs are required for cytosolic and mitochondrial tryptophanyl-tRNA formation (14). Trypanosomal tRNA^Trp is imported to the mitochondria, where it undergoes C to U editing at the wobble nucleotide and is thiolated at position 33. The RNA editing is required to decode the reassigned mitochondrial tryptophan codon UGA (14–16). Both nucleotide modifications are antideterminants for the cytosolic TrpRS (14). As we concluded previously (14), the presence of a second TrpRS with expanded substrate specificity is required to efficiently aminoacylate imported, mature tRNA^Trp in trypanosomal mitochondria.The present study focuses on the characterization and functional analysis of another pair of duplicated trypanosomal aaRSs, the AspRSs. We show that the two enzymes are individually essential for normal growth of insect stage T. brucei. We also demonstrate that the two trypanosomal AspRSs are of eukaryotic evolutionary origin and that the aminoacylation of the cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNA^Asp species requires these two distinct AspRSs.     

Detailed Mechanistic Insights into HIV-1 Sensitivity to Three Generations of Fusion Inhibitors

Peptides based on the second heptad repeat (HR2) of viral class I fusion proteins are effective inhibitors of virus entry. One such fusion inhibitor has been approved for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (T20, enfuvirtide). Resistance to T20 usually maps to the peptide binding site in HR1. To better understand fusion inhibitor potency and resistance, we combined virological, computational, and biophysical experiments with comprehensive mutational analyses and tested resistance to T20 and second and third generation inhibitors (T1249 and T2635). We found that most amino acid substitutions caused resistance to the first generation peptide T20. Only charged amino acids caused resistance to T1249, and none caused resistance to T2635. Depending on the drug, we can distinguish four mechanisms of drug resistance: reduced contact, steric obstruction, electrostatic repulsion, and electrostatic attraction. Implications for the design of novel antiviral peptide inhibitors are discussed.The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex (Env),³ a class I viral fusion protein, is responsible for viral attachment to CD4⁺ target T cells and subsequent fusion of viral and cellular membranes resulting in release of the viral core in the cell. Other examples of viruses using class I fusion proteins are Coronaviridae (severe acute respiratory syndrome virus), Paramyxoviridae (Newcastle disease virus, human respiratory syncytial virus, Nipah virus, Hendra virus), and Orthomyxoviridae (influenza virus), some of which cause fatal diseases in humans (1–3). The entry process of these viruses is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.The functional trimeric Env spike on HIV-1 virions consists of three gp120 and three gp41 molecules that are the products of cleavage of the precursor gp160 by cellular proteases such as furin (4, 5). The gp120 surface subunits are responsible for binding to the cellular receptors, whereas the gp41 subunits anchor the complex in the viral membrane and mediate the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. Env undergoes several conformational changes that culminate in membrane fusion. The gp120 subunit binds the CD4 receptor, resulting in creation and/or exposure of the binding site for a coreceptor, usually CCR5 or CXCR4 (6, 7). Two α-helical leucine zipper-like motifs, heptad repeat 1 (HR1) and heptad repeat 2 (HR2), located in the extracellular part of gp41, play a major role in the following conformational changes. Binding of the receptors to gp120 induces formation of the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 in which HR1 is exposed and the N-terminal fusion peptide is inserted into the target cell membrane (1, 8–12). Subsequently, three HR1 and three HR2 domains assemble into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure that juxtaposes the viral and cellular membranes for the membrane merger. Other viruses with class I viral fusion proteins use similar HR1-HR2-mediated membrane fusion for target cell entry.Peptides based on the HR domains of class I viral fusion proteins have proven to be efficient inhibitors of virus entry for a broad range of viruses (13–17). The HIV-1 fusion inhibitor T20 (enfuvirtide (Fuzeon)) has been approved for clinical use. T20 mimics HR2 and can bind to HR1, thereby preventing the formation of the six-helix bundle (Fig. 1) (18–21). T1249 is a second-generation fusion inhibitor with improved antiviral potency compared with the first-generation peptide T20 (22–25). Recently, a series of more potent third-generation fusion inhibitors were designed (26, 27). These include T2635, which has an improved helical structure that increases stability and activity against both wild type (WT) HIV-1 and fusion inhibitor resistant variants.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Schematic of the gp41 ectodomain. HR1 and HR2 are represented as cylinders, and position 38 in HR1 is indicated. Residues Gln-142, Asn-145, Glu-146, and Leu-149, which interact with residue 38, are underlined in the HR2 sequence. HR2-based peptide fusion inhibitors are shown underneath. Mutations introduced in T1249^mut and T2635^mut are bold and underlined. Numbering is based on the sequence of HXB2 gp41.Both the in vitro and in vivo selection of resistance has been described for T20 (28–33) and T1249 (23, 34–36). Resistance is often caused by mutations in the HR1 binding site of the fusion inhibitor. In particular, substitutions at positions 36 (G36D/M/S), 38 (V38A/W/M/E), and 43 (N43D/K) of gp41 can cause resistance. Strikingly, substitutions at position 38 can cause resistance to both T20 and T1249, but distinct amino acid substitutions are required. At position 38 only charged amino acids (V38E/R/K) cause resistance to T1249 (35). Surprisingly, none of the known T20 and T1249 resistance mutations at position 38 affect the susceptibility to the third generation inhibitor T2635.We hypothesized that the use of HIV-1 as a model system could provide a more detailed understanding of resistance to fusion inhibitors. We, therefore, analyzed the effect of all 20 amino acids at resistance hotspot 38 on Env function, viral fitness, biochemical properties of gp41, and resistance to the fusion inhibitors. From the results we can propose four resistance mechanisms that differ in the way the drug-target interaction is affected at the molecular level. Furthermore, we can deduce general principles on the mechanisms of resistance against fusion inhibitors and the requirements for effective antiviral drugs.