非洲和中国直立人某些颅骨特征的比较--中国与非洲人类头骨特征对比之一

针对学术界有关非洲与亚洲直立人关系的争论,本文对一些用来支持非洲早期直立人从直立人中分离出来而归入匠人的主要形态学证据进行了检验,用于研究的标本包括迄今在东非发现的年代最早的直立人KNM－ER 3733、KNM－ER 3883和KNM－WT15000头骨化石,这些石是被提倡非洲与亚洲的直立人分离两个种的学者归入匠人的主要标本,对这些非注早期直立人与中国直立人18项头骨特征对比显示：一些被认为是局限于亚洲直立人的独有特征在上述非洲直立人头骨都有出现,存在于非洲直立人与中国直立人之间的颅骨特征上的差别主要体现在特征的表现程度与方式的不同,作者认为根据本文对比的颅骨特征,非洲直立人与中国直立人在颅骨形态上非常相似,他们之间的形态差异反映了直立人具有较宽的形态变范围,认为亚洲直立人具有特化的衍生性状的观点在本文不能得到支持。     

Out of Africa and back again

If the genusHomo did indeed originate in Africa, then it must have spread by about 2 m.y. ago into Asia where it is represented at 1.8 m.y. ago byHomo erectus fossils. This latter species in turn eventually spread back into Africa, as indicated by the 1.4 m.y. old OH 9 calvaria from Olduvai, and into Europe, as indicated by the 800,000 year old Ceprano calvaria from Italy. These hominids are associated only with Oldowan style artefacts of cores, choppers and flakes and were apparently not conversant with Acheulean handaxe technology. It seems that they most probably evolved viaHomo heidelbergensis into the Neanderthals. Meanwhile, a completely separate development originating withHomo ergaster of about 1.7 m.y. ago in Africa and possessing Acheulean handaxe technology evolved via such forms as Ndutu and Steinheim intoHomo sapiens.     

Eruption Sequence of the Lower Permanent Dentition of Lufengpithecus lufengensis

Ｄｅｎｔａｌｄｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔａｎｄｅｒｕｐｔｉｏｎｓｅｑｕｅｎｃｅｓａｒｅｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔｉｎｄｉｃａｔｏｒｓｏｆｌｉｆｅｈｉｓｔｏｒｙｐａｔ ｔｅｒｎｓ,ａｎｄｔｈｅｉｒｓｔｕｄｙｃａｎｓｈｅｄｌｉｇｈｔｏｎｔｈｅｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎｏｆｌｉｆｅｈｉｓｔｏｒｙｉｎｈｕｍａｎｓａｎｄｏｔｈｅｒｐｒｉｍａｔｅｓ[1] .ＴｈｉｓｐａｐｅｒａｉｍｓｔｏｅｓｔａｂｌｉｓｈｔｈｅｄｅｎｔａｌｅｒｕｐｔｉｏｎｓｅｑｕｅｎｃｅｓｏｆＬｕｆｅｎｇｐｉｔｈｅｃｕｓｌｕｆｅｎｇｅｎｓｉｓａｎｄｔｏｃｏｍｐａｒｅｔｈｅｍｗｉｔｈｔｈｏｓｅｏｆｏｔｈｅｒｈｏｍｉｎｏｉｄｓ .1　ＭａｔｅｒｉａｌｓａｎｄｍｅｔｈｏｄＦｉｖｅｊｕｖｅｎｉｌｅｍａｎｄｉｂｌｅｓｏｆＬｕｆｅｎｇｐｉｔｈｅｃｕｓｌｕｆｅｎｇｅｎｓｉｓｆｒｏｍｔｈｅｃｏｌｌｅｃｔｉｏｎｓｏｆｔｈｅＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＶｅｒｔｅ ｂｒａｔｅＰａｌｅｏｎｔｏｌｏｇｙａｎｄＰａｌｅｏａｎｔｈｒｏｌｐｏｇｙ (ＩＶＰＰ)—ＰＡ6 6 3,ＰＡ86 8,ＰＡ82 2 ,ＰＡ82 3ａｎｄＰＡ6 73—ｗｅｒｅｅｘａｍｉｎｅｄ .Ｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙｒａｄｉｏ...     

Mandibular postcanine dentition from the Shungura Formation,Ethiopia: Crown morphology,taxonomic allocations,and Plio-Pleistocene hominid evolution

Over 200 hominid specimens were recovered by the International Omo Expedition of 1967–1976. Despite the fragmentary nature of this primarily dental collection, these hominid remains represent a major body of evidence about hominid evolution in eastern Africa during the 2–3 myr time period. Our analysis of the Omo dental collection is based on a large comparative sample of 375 quantifiable mandibular postcanine teeth of A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. aethiopicus, A. boisei, A. robustus, and early Homo. A total of 48 isolated mandibular premolars and molars of the Omo collection spanning the 2–3 myr time period is sufficiently preserved to allow reliable serial allocations and intertaxon comparisons and is the object of study in this paper. We present taxonomic identifications of these teeth and seven other mandibular specimens preserving tooth crowns. Metric analyses of this study include cusp area and crown shape variables taken on occlusal view diagrams. Nonmetric analyses were based on simultaneous observations of all relevant material to ensure accuracy of categorical evaluations. First, a combined metric and morphological evaluation was conducted to allocate each Omo tooth to either robust or nonrobust categories. Further taxonomic affinities were then examined. Our results indicate that nonrobust and robust lineages cooccur by circa 2.7 myr. We consider the Shungura robust specimens from Members C through F to represent A. aethiopicus. A significant phenetic transformation occurs at circa 2.3 myr, with the mosaic emergence of the derived A. boisei morphology across Member G times. Characterization of the East African nonrobust lineage is more difficult because of the comparatively subtle morphological differences seen among the dentitions of A. afarensis, A. africanus, and early Homo. The earlier Members B and C nonrobust specimens are difficult to evaluate and are considered indeterminate to genus or species. Both molars and premolars from Members E through G exhibit phenetic similarities to the early Homo condition and are considered as aff. Homo sp. indet. At present, there is no indication of multiple species in the Omo nonrobust sample at any time horizon. The 2–2.4 myr Omo nonrobust specimens exhibit some similarities to the stated Homo “rudolfensis” condition in size and morphology and are likely to represent the ancestral condition of the genus Homo. The bearing of these results on interpretations of early hominid evolution and diversification is considered. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Dental microwear texture analysis and diet in the Dmanisi hominins

Reconstructions of foraging behavior and diet are central to our understanding of fossil hominin ecology and evolution. Current hypotheses for the evolution of the genus Homo invoke a change in foraging behavior to include higher quality foods. Recent microwear texture analyses of fossil hominin teeth have suggested that the evolution of Homo erectus may have been marked by a transition to a more variable diet. In this study, we used microwear texture analysis to examine the occlusal surface of 2 molars from Dmanisi, a 1.8 million year old fossil hominin site in the Republic of Georgia. The Dmanisi molars were characterized by a moderate degree of surface complexity (Asfc), low textural fill volume (Tfv), and a relatively low scale of maximum complexity (Smc), similar to specimens of early African H. erectus. While caution must be used in drawing conclusions from this small sample (n = 2), these results are consistent with continuity in diet as H. erectus expanded into Eurasia.     

The environmental contexts of early human occupation of Georgia (Transcaucasia)

The hominid mandible and a third metatarsal found in Dmanisi (Republic of Georgia) are accompanied by a rich faunal assemblage and a core-chopper stone tool industry. The mandible represents a somewhat isolated morphological type of Homo erectus that appears, given the combination of its primitive and advanced traits and specific dental morphology, to be a forerunner of both late H. erectus and early archaic H. sapiens. The faunal assemblage mostly consists of Villafranchian mammals, with the majority of the species assigned to an early phase of the Upper Villafranchian (Late Villanian and Early Biharian). Faunal and paleobotanical evidence as well as the depositional nature of the site indicate that hominid occupation took place in a mosaic environment of open steppe and gallery forests. Both the concentration of resources and the warm climatic conditions in the Dmanisi region at the beginning of the early Pleistocene were favorable for hominid occupation. It is possible that hominids reached the Caucasus through the Levantine corridor, and that the environment of this region allowed them to establish a stronghold and later colonize adjacent areas.     

Homo erectus—who,when and where: A survey

The state of information bearing on Homo erectus as developed since about 1960 is surveyed, with the resulting effects on problems. Definitions of H. erectus still rest on the Far Eastern samples (Chou-k'ou-tien/Java), and thus relate to late Lower to middle Middle Pleistocene material. Numerous important individual finds, however, have expanded the total: extension of the early and very early Sangiran material; very early to later in Africa, and relatively late in Europe. Datings remain uncertain or controversial within broad limits, but with some important successes and revisions. Discussion by authors of problems concerns degree of divergence among H. erectus populations and rate of evolutionary change; both appear relatively slight, but the data are inadequate for much present judgment. The apparent zone of transition to more advanced morphology (H. sapiens, sensu lato) by the late Middle Pleistocene better reflects signs of regional divergence. Some writers—not all—believe that even the earliest European fossils known (e.g., Petralona) had already advanced to a H. sapiens basic level, with later change in the direction of Neanderthals. A separate African phylum, from OH 9, is also suggested; recent Chinese finds may provide a third different post-erectus population before the Upper Pleistocene. Taxonomic expression of all this gives some problems.