An evaluation of the phylogenetic position of the dinoflagellateCrypthecodinium cohnii based on 5S rRNA characterization

Summary Partial nucleotide sequences for the 5S and 5.8S rRNAs from the dinoflagellateCrypthecodinium cohnii have been determined, using a rapid chemical sequencing method, for the purpose of studying dinoflagellate phylogeny. The 5S RNA sequence shows the most homology (75%) with the 5S sequences of higher animals and the least homology (< 60%) with prokaryotic sequences. In addition, it lacks certain residues which are highly conserved in prokaryotic molecules but are generally missing in eukaryotes. These findings suggest a distant relationship between dinoflagellates and the prokaryotes. Using two different sequence alignments and several different methods for selecting an optimum phylogenetic tree for a collection of 5S sequences including higher plants and animals, fungi, and bacteria in addition to theC. cohnii sequence, the dinoflagellate lineage was joined to the tree at the point of the plant-animal divergence, well above the branching point of the fungi. This result is of interest because it implies that the well-documented absence in dinoflagellates of histones and the typical nucleosomal subunit structure of eukaryotic chromatin is the result of secondary loss. and not anindication of an extremely primitive state, as was previously suggested. Computer simulations of 5S RNA evolution have been carried out in order to demonstrate that the above-mentioned phylogenetic placement is not likely to be the result of random sequence convergence.We have also constructed a phylogeny for 5.8S RNA sequences in which plants, animals, fungi and the dinoflagellates are again represented. While the order of branching on this tree is the same as in the 5S tree for the organisms represented, because it lacks prokaryotes, the 5.8S tree cannot be considered a strong independent confirmation of the 5S result. Moreover, 5.8S RNA appears to have experienced very different rates of evolution in different lineages indicating that it may not be the best indicator of evolutionary relationships.We have also considered the existing biological data regarding dinoflagellate evolution in relation to our molecular phylogenetic evidence.     

Revised dinoflagellate phylogeny inferred from molecular analysis of large-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences

The nucleotide sequence analysis of the PCR products corresponding to the variable large-subunit rRNA domains D1, D2, D9, and D10 from ten representative dinoflagellate species is reported. Species were selected among the main laboratory-grown dinoflagellate groups: Prorocentrales, Gymnodiniales, and Peridiniales which comprise a variety of morphological and ecological characteristics. The sequence alignments comprising up to 1,000 nucleotides from all ten species were employed to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among these dinoflagellates. Maximum parsimony and neighbor joining trees were inferred from the data generated and subsequently tested by bootstrapping. Both the D1/D2 and the D9/D10 regions led to coherent trees in which the main class of dinoflagellates, Dinophyceae, is divided in three groups: prorocentroid, gymnodinioid, and peridinioid. An interesting outcome from the molecular phylogeny obtained was the uncertain emergence of Prorocentrum lima. The molecular results reported agreed with morphological classifications within Peridiniales but not with those of Prorocentrales and Gymnodiniales. Additionally, the sequence comparison analysis provided strong evidence to suggest that Alexandrium minutum and Alexandrium lusitanicum were synonymous species given the identical sequence they shared. Moreover, clone Gg1V, which was determined Gymnodinium catenatum based on morphological criteria, would correspond to a new species of the genus Gymnodinium as its sequence clearly differed from that obtained in G. catenatum. The sequence of the amplified fragments was demonstrated to be a valuable tool for phylogenetic and taxonomical analysis among these highly diversified species. Correspondence to: J. M. Bautista     

Implications of complete nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA molecules from the harmful unarmored dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) and relatives

The D1/D2 domains of large subunit (LSU) rDNA have commonly been used for phylogenetic analyses of dinoflagellates; however, their properties have not been evaluated in relation to other D domains due to a deficiency of complete sequences. This study reports the complete LSU rRNA gene sequence in the causative unarmored dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides, a member of the order Gymnodiniales, and evaluated the segmented domains and secondary structures when compared with its relatives. Putative LSU rRNA coding regions were recorded to be 3433 bp in length (49.0% GC content). A secondary structure predicted from the LSU and 5.8S rRNAs and parsimony analyses showed that most variation in the LSU rDNA was found in the 12 divergent (D) domains. In particular, the D2 domain was the most informative in terms of recent evolutional and taxonomic aspects, when compared with both the phylogenetic tree topologies and molecular distance (approximately 10 times higher) of the core LSU. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with a matrix of LSU DNA sequences selected from domains D2 to D4 and their flanking core sequences, which showed that C. polykrikoides was placed on the same branch with Akashiwo sanguinea in the “GPP” complex, which is referred to the gymnodinioid, peridinioid and prorocentroid groups. A broad phylogeny showed that armored and unarmored dinoflagellates were never clustered together; instead, they were clearly divided into two groups: the GPP complex and Gonyaulacales. The members of Gymnodiniales were always interspersed with peridinioid, prorocentroid and dinophysoid forms. This supports previous findings showing that the Gymnodiniales are polyphyletic. This study highlights the proper selection of LSU rDNA molecules for molecular phylogeny and signatures.     

Dinoflagellates in evolution. A molecular phylogenetic analysis of large subunit ribosomal RNA

Summary The sequence of the large subunit ribosomal RNA (LsuRNA) gene of the dinoflagellateProrocentrum micans has been determined. The inferred rRNA sequence [3408 nucleotides (nt)] is presented in its most probable secondary structure based on compensatory mutations, energy, and conservation criteria. No introns have been found but a hidden break is present in the second variable domain, 690 nt from the 5 end, as judged by agarose gel electrophoresis and primer extension experiments.Prorocentrum micans LsuRNA length and G+C content are close to those of ciliates and yeast. The conserved portions of the molecule (1900 nt) have been aligned with corresponding sequences from various eukaryotes, including five protista, one metaphyta, and three metazoa. An extensive phylogenetic study was performed, comparing two phenetic methods (neighbor joining on difference matrix, and Fitch and Margoliash on Knuc values matrix) and one cladistic (parsimony). The three methods led to similar tree topologies, except for the emergence of yeast that groups with ciliates and dinoflagellates when phenetic methods are used, but emerges later in the most parsimonious tree. This discrepancy was checked by statistical analyses on reduced trees (limited to four species) inferred using parsimony and evolutionary parsimony methods. The data support the phenetic tree topologies and a close relationship between dinoflagellates, ciliates, and yeast.     

Phylogenetic incongruence between dinoflagellate endosymbionts (Symbiodinium) and their host foraminifera (Sorites): small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence evidence

Phototrophic dinoflagellate zooxanthellae commonly occur as endosymbionts in many planktic and certain benthic foraminifera (soritids). Many taxonomic issues and specific identities of foraminiferal dinoflagellates are not yet resolved. To assess taxonomic affinities among other dinoflagellates, we have determined the complete nucleotide sequence of the small-subunit rRNA coding region from Symbiodinium sp., an endosymbiotic dinoflagellate of the larger foraminifer Sorites orbiculus. The poly merase chain reaction was adopted for the in vitro amplification of ribosomal DNA, utilizing primers complementary to conserved regions. PCR-amplified DNA was directly sequenced and the sequence was aligned to all complete 18S-rDNA dinoflagellate sequences currently available through GenBank. Apicomplexan, ciliate, chromistacean, and rhodophycean sequences were added to infer across-kingdom phylogenetic relationships. Phylogenetic analysis of aligned nucleotide sequences produced a single most parsimonious tree (generated by the branch and bound method of PAUP). The inferred phylogeny indicates that the dinoflagellate extracted from the foraminifer Sorites orbiculus is a sister taxon to the symbiont present in the larger foraminifera Marginopora kudakajimaensis, but only distantly related to the dinoflagellate isolated from the soritid Amphisorus hemprichii. The sequence heterogeneity demonstrates a high degree of genetic diversity among Symbiodinium-like zooxanthellae and re-emphasizes that they are a variety of distinct entities.The inferred molecular phylogenetic relationships among symbiotic dinoflagellates are not congruent with the foraminiferal phylogeny based on cladistic methodology. The lack of correlation between the evolutionary history of dinoflagellate symbionts and their foraminiferal hosts argues against co-evolution. This lack of co-evolution implies that flexible recombinations among hosts and symbionts are evolutionarily favorable over permanently associated lineages, at least in these benthic foraminifera.     

Crypthecodinium and Tetrahymena: An exercise in comparative evolution

Summary Nucleotide sequences have been determined for the highly variable D2 region of the large rRNA molecule for over 60 strains of dinoflagellates. These strains were selected from a worldwide collection that represents all the known sibling species (compatibility groups, Mendelian species) in the sibling swarm referred to as Crypthecodinium cohnii. A phylogenetic tree has been constructed from an analysis of the variations in a length of about 180 bases, using PHYLOGEN string analysis programs. The Crypthecodinium tree is compared with the previously published but here augmented tree constructed upon the same rRNA region for the sibling species of a worldwide collection of ciliated protozoa related to the genus Tetrahymena. The first reported sequence of Lambornella clarki, the parasite of tree-hole mosquitoes, is included.The dinoflagellate species complex is much more homogeneous with respect to ribosomal variation. The mean number of differences among sequences from different Crypthecodinium species is about 7, in comparison with 22 differences among the ciliate species examined. Moreover, all the diversity in the dinoflagellates can be explained by base substitutions, whereas insertions and deletions are common in the ciliates. The dinoflagellates are also much more uniform with respect to nutritional and genetic economies.The two complexes differ also in the relationship between molecular variations and breeding compatibility. All tetrahymenine sibling species thus far examined are monomorphic in the D2 region, but several dinoflagellate species are polymorphic. Several different dinoflagellate species, moreover, have identical D2 regions. This kind of ribosomal identity of incompatible strains is found in these ciliates only in one tight cluster of species—Group C.The tetrahymenine swarm is apparently much older than the Crypthecodinium swarm, and the dinoflagellate species produce incompatible progeny species much more readily than do the ciliates, perhaps by the acquisition of mutations that potentiate incompatibility in sympatric populations.Offprint requests to: D. L. Nanney     

Dinoflagellate phylogeny as inferred from heat shock protein 90 and ribosomal gene sequences

Background

Interrelationships among dinoflagellates in molecular phylogenies are largely unresolved, especially in the deepest branches. Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences provide phylogenetic signals only at the tips of the dinoflagellate tree. Two reasons for the poor resolution of deep dinoflagellate relationships using rDNA sequences are (1) most sites are relatively conserved and (2) there are different evolutionary rates among sites in different lineages. Therefore, alternative molecular markers are required to address the deeper phylogenetic relationships among dinoflagellates. Preliminary evidence indicates that the heat shock protein 90 gene (Hsp90) will provide an informative marker, mainly because this gene is relatively long and appears to have relatively uniform rates of evolution in different lineages.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We more than doubled the previous dataset of Hsp90 sequences from dinoflagellates by generating additional sequences from 17 different species, representing seven different orders. In order to concatenate the Hsp90 data with rDNA sequences, we supplemented the Hsp90 sequences with three new SSU rDNA sequences and five new LSU rDNA sequences. The new Hsp90 sequences were generated, in part, from four additional heterotrophic dinoflagellates and the type species for six different genera. Molecular phylogenetic analyses resulted in a paraphyletic assemblage near the base of the dinoflagellate tree consisting of only athecate species. However, Noctiluca was never part of this assemblage and branched in a position that was nested within other lineages of dinokaryotes. The phylogenetic trees inferred from Hsp90 sequences were consistent with trees inferred from rDNA sequences in that the backbone of the dinoflagellate clade was largely unresolved.

Conclusions/Significance

The sequence conservation in both Hsp90 and rDNA sequences and the poor resolution of the deepest nodes suggests that dinoflagellates reflect an explosive radiation in morphological diversity in their recent evolutionary past. Nonetheless, the more comprehensive analysis of Hsp90 sequences enabled us to infer phylogenetic interrelationships of dinoflagellates more rigorously. For instance, the phylogenetic position of Noctiluca, which possesses several unusual features, was incongruent with previous phylogenetic studies. Therefore, the generation of additional dinoflagellate Hsp90 sequences is expected to refine the stem group of athecate species observed here and contribute to future multi-gene analyses of dinoflagellate interrelationships.     

Alveolate phylogeny inferred using concatenated ribosomal proteins

Dinoflagellates and apicomplexans are a strongly supported monophyletic group in rDNA phylogenies, although this phylogeny is not without controversy, particularly between the two groups. Here we use concatenated protein-coding genes from expressed sequence tags or genomic data to construct phylogenies including "typical" dinophycean dinoflagellates, a parasitic syndinian dinoflagellate, Amoebophrya sp., and two related species, Oxyrrhis marina, and Perkinsus marinus. Seventeen genes encoding proteins associated with the ribosome were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The dataset was limited for the most part by data availability from the dinoflagellates. Forty-five taxa from four major lineages were used: the heterokont outgroup, ciliates, dinoflagellates, and apicomplexans. Amoebophrya sp. was included in this phylogeny as a sole representative of the enigmatic marine alveolate or syndinian lineage. The atypical dinoflagellate O. marina, usually excluded from rDNA analyses due to long branches, was also included. The resulting phylogenies were well supported in concatenated analyses with only a few unstable or weakly supported branches; most features were consistent when different lineages were pruned from the tree or different genes were concatenated. The least stable branches involved the placement of Cryptosporidium spp. within the Apicomplexa and the relationships between P. marinus, Amoebophrya sp., and O. marina. Both bootstrap and approximately unbiased test results confirmed that P. marinus, Amoebophrya sp., O. marina, and the remaining dinoflagellates form a monophyletic lineage to the exclusion of Apicomplexa.     

Molecular Phylogeny of Parvilucifera prorocentri (Alveolata, Myzozoa): Insights into Perkinsid Character Evolution

ABSTRACT. Perkinsids and colpodellids are lineages that diverged near the origins of dinoflagellates and apicomplexans, respectively, and provide compelling insights into the earliest stages of alveolate evolution. Perkinsids, including Perkinsus and Parvilucifera , are intracellular parasites of animals and dinoflagellates and possess traits also known in syndineans, dinokaryotes (mainly free living dinoflagellates), and colpodellids. An improved understanding of perkinsid biodiversity and phylogeny is expected to shed considerable light on the evolutionary origins of syndineans and dinokaryotes as well as the cellular identities of environmental sequences derived from marine and freshwater habitats. Accordingly, the small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequence from Parvilucifera prorocentri , a tube-forming intracellular parasite of the marine benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum fukuyoi , was determined. Molecular phylogenetic analyses demonstrated, with very high statistical support, that P. prorocentri branched as a sister lineage to a divergent clade consisting of Parvilucifera infectans and Parvilucifera sinerae . The entire Parvilucifera clade was nested within a more inclusive and modestly supported clade consisting of Perkinsus and several environmental sequences. Because P. prorocentri possessed a novel combination of ultrastructural features known in Perkinsus, Parvilucifera , and/or syndineans (i.e. germ tubes, trichocysts, and a syndinean-like nucleus), establishing the molecular phylogenetic position of this species enabled us to build a more comprehensive framework for understanding the earliest stages in the evolution of myzozoans.     

Molecular organization of dinoflagellate ribosomal DNA: evolutionary implications of the deduced 5.8 S rRNA secondary structure

The 5.8 S rRNA gene of Prorocentrum micans, a primitive dinoflagellate, has been cloned and its 159 base pairs (bp) have been sequenced along with the two flanking internal transcribed spacers (ITS 1 and 2), respectively, 212 and 195 bp long. Nucleotide sequence homologies between several previously published 5.8 S rRNA gene sequences including those from another dinoflagellate, an ascomycetous yeast, protozoans, a higher plant and a mammal have been determined by sequence alignment. Two prokaryotic 5'-ends of the 23 S rRNA gene have been compared owing to their probable common origin with eucaryotic 5.8 S rRNA genes. Several nucleotides are distinctive for dinoflagellates when compared with either typical eucaryotes or procaryotes. This is consistent with an early divergence of the dinoflagellate lineage from the typical eucaryotes. The secondary structure of dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA molecules fits the model of Walker et al. (1983). Conserved nucleotides which distinguish dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA from that of other eucaryotes are located in specific loops which are assumed to play a structural role in the ribosome. A 5.8 S rRNA phylogenetic tree which is proposed, based on sequence data, supports our initial assumption of the dinoflagellates.     

Patterns of ribosomal RNA evolution in salamanders

Sequence comparisons are presented for four segments of the large subunit of ribosomal RNA, including divergent domains D7a and D7b, portions of the large divergent domains D2, D3, and D8, and evolutionarily conservative sequences flanking divergent domains. These results resolve phylogenetic relationships among exemplars of seven families of salamanders and the three amphibian orders. Phylogenetic analysis confirms the prediction that divergent domains feature the highest relative rates of base substitution and length variation within the ribosome, but the divergent domains evolve more slowly than nuclear noncoding DNA and the silent sites of structural genes. Base substitutions demonstrate approximately twice as many transitions as transversions and an uneven distribution among sites within the divergent domains but no apparent bias in base composition. Length mutations are primarily small insertions and deletions, with deletions predominating. The divergent domains appear to be a good source of phylogenetic information for evolutionary events occurring approximately 100-200 million years ago.      

Origins of plastids and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes in the green-colored dinoflagellate Lepidodinium chlorophorum

The dinoflagellate Lepidodinium chlorophorum possesses "green" plastids containing chlorophylls a and b (Chl a+b), unlike most dinoflagellate plastids with Chl a+c plus a carotenoid peridinin (peridinin-containing plastids). In the present study we determined 8 plastid-encoded genes from Lepidodinium to investigate the origin of the Chl a+b-containing dinoflagellate plastids. The plastid-encoded gene phylogeny clearly showed that Lepidodinium plastids were derived from a member of Chlorophyta, consistent with pigment composition. We also isolated three different glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genes from Lepidodinium-one encoding the putative cytosolic "GapC" enzyme and the remaining two showing affinities to the "plastid-targeted GapC" genes. In a GAPDH phylogeny, one of the plastid-targeted GapC-like sequences robustly grouped with those of dinoflagellates bearing peridinin-containing plastids, while the other was nested in a clade of the homologues of haptophytes and dinoflagellate genera Karenia and Karlodinium bearing "haptophyte-derived" plastids. Since neither host nor plastid phylogeny suggested an evolutionary connection between Lepidodinium and Karenia/Karlodinium, a lateral transfer of a plastid-targeted GapC gene most likely took place from a haptophyte or a dinoflagellate with haptophyte-derived plastids to Lepidodinium. The plastid-targeted GapC data can be considered as an evidence for the single origin of plastids in haptophytes, cryptophytes, stramenopiles, and alveolates. However, in the light of Lepidodinium GAPDH data, we need to closely examine whether the monophyly of the plastids in the above lineages inferred from plastid-targeted GapC genes truly reflects that of the host lineages.     

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE HETEROTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATES,PROTOPERIDINIUM, DIPLOPSALIS AND PREPERIDINIUM (DINOPHYCEAE), INFERRED FROM LARGE SUBUNIT rDNA1

The genera Protoperidinium Bergh, Diplopsalis Bergh, and Preperidinium Mangin, comprised of species of marine, thecate, heterotrophic dinoflagellates in the family Protoperidinaceae Balech, have had a confused taxonomic history. To elucidate the validity of morphological groupings within the Protoperidinium and diplopsalids, and to determine the evolutionary relationships between these and other dinoflagellates, we undertook a study of molecular phylogeny using the D1–D3 domains of the large subunit (LSU) of the rDNA. Based on morphology, the 10 Protoperidinium species examined belonged to three subgenera and five morphological sections. Two diplopsalid species were also included. Single‐cell PCR, cloning, and sequencing revealed a high degree of intraindividual sequence variability in the LSU rDNA. The genus Protoperidinium appeared to be recently divergent in all phylogenetic analyses. In maximum parsimony and neighbor joining analyses, Protoperidinium formed a monophyletic group, evolving from diplopsalid dinoflagellates. In maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses, however, Protoperidinium was polyphyletic, as the lenticular, diplopsalid heterotroph, Diplopsalis lenticula Bergh, was inserted within the Protoperidinium clade as basal to Protoperidinium excentricum (Paulsen) Balech, and Preperidinium meunieri (Pavillard) Elbrächter fell within a separate clade as a sister to the Oceanica and Protoperidinium steidingerae Balech. In all analyses, the Protoperidinium were divided into two major clades, with members in the Oceanica group and subgenus Testeria in one clade, and the Excentrica, Conica, Pellucida, Pyriforme and Divergens sections in the other clade. The LSU rDNA molecular phylogeny supported the historical morphologically determined sections, but not a simple morphology based model of evolution based on thecal plate shape.     

Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales

Although massively parallel sequencing has facilitated large-scale DNA sequencing, comparisons among distantly related species rely upon small portions of the genome that are easily aligned. Methods are needed to efficiently obtain comparable DNA fragments prior to massively parallel sequencing, particularly for biologists working with non-model organisms. We introduce a new class of molecular marker, anchored by ultraconserved genomic elements (UCEs), that universally enable target enrichment and sequencing of thousands of orthologous loci across species separated by hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Our analyses here focus on use of UCE markers in Amniota because UCEs and phylogenetic relationships are well-known in some amniotes. We perform an in silico experiment to demonstrate that sequence flanking 2030 UCEs contains information sufficient to enable unambiguous recovery of the established primate phylogeny. We extend this experiment by performing an in vitro enrichment of 2386 UCE-anchored loci from nine, non-model avian species. We then use alignments of 854 of these loci to unambiguously recover the established evolutionary relationships within and among three ancient bird lineages. Because many organismal lineages have UCEs, this type of genetic marker and the analytical framework we outline can be applied across the tree of life, potentially reshaping our understanding of phylogeny at many taxonomic levels.     

Systematic exploration of guide-tree topology effects for small protein alignments

Background

Guide-trees are used as part of an essential heuristic to enable the calculation of multiple sequence alignments. They have been the focus of much method development but there has been little effort at determining systematically, which guide-trees, if any, give the best alignments. Some guide-tree construction schemes are based on pair-wise distances amongst unaligned sequences. Others try to emulate an underlying evolutionary tree and involve various iteration methods.

Results

We explore all possible guide-trees for a set of protein alignments of up to eight sequences. We find that pairwise distance based default guide-trees sometimes outperform evolutionary guide-trees, as measured by structure derived reference alignments. However, default guide-trees fall way short of the optimum attainable scores. On average chained guide-trees perform better than balanced ones but are not better than default guide-trees for small alignments.

Conclusions

Alignment methods that use Consistency or hidden Markov models to make alignments are less susceptible to sub-optimal guide-trees than simpler methods, that basically use conventional sequence alignment between profiles. The latter appear to be affected positively by evolutionary based guide-trees for difficult alignments and negatively for easy alignments. One phylogeny aware alignment program can strongly discriminate between good and bad guide-trees. The results for randomly chained guide-trees improve with the number of sequences.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-338) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates

We have sequenced small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes from 16 dinoflagellates, produced phylogenetic trees of the group containing 105 taxa, and combined small- and partial large-subunit (LSU) rRNA data to produce new phylogenetic trees. We compare phylogenetic trees based on dinoflagellate rRNA and protein genes with established hypotheses of dinoflagellate evolution based on morphological data. Protein-gene trees have too few species for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but provide important insights on the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole, on the identity of their close relatives, and on specific questions of evolutionary history. Phylogenetic trees obtained from dinoflagellate SSU rRNA genes are generally poorly resolved, but include by far the most species and some well-supported clades. Combined analyses of SSU and LSU somewhat improve support for several nodes, but are still weakly resolved. All analyses agree on the placement of dinoflagellates with ciliates and apicomplexans (=Sporozoa) in a well-supported clade, the alveolates. The closest relatives to dinokaryotic dinoflagellates appear to be apicomplexans, Perkinsus, Parvilucifera, syndinians and Oxyrrhis. The position of Noctiluca scintillans is unstable, while Blastodiniales as currently circumscribed seems polyphyletic. The same is true for Gymnodiniales: all phylogenetic trees examined (SSU and LSU-based) suggest that thecal plates have been lost repeatedly during dinoflagellate evolution. It is unclear whether any gymnodinialean clades originated before the theca. Peridiniales appear to be a paraphyletic group from which other dinoflagellate orders like Prorocentrales, Dinophysiales, most Gymnodiniales, and possibly also Gonyaulacales originated. Dinophysiales and Suessiales are strongly supported holophyletic groups, as is Gonyaulacales, although with more modest support. Prorocentrales is a monophyletic group only in some LSU-based trees. Within Gonyaulacales, molecular data broadly agree with classificatory schemes based on morphology. Implications of this taxonomic scheme for the evolution of selected dinoflagellate features (the nucleus, mitosis, flagella and photosynthesis) are discussed.     

Using Evolutionary Trees in Protein Secondary Structure Prediction and Other Comparative Sequence Analyses

Previously proposed methods for protein secondary structure prediction from multiple sequence alignments do not efficiently extract the evolutionary information that these alignments contain. The predictions of these methods are less accurate than they could be, because of their failure to consider explicitly the phylogenetic tree that relates aligned protein sequences. As an alternative, we present a hidden Markov model approach to secondary structure prediction that more fully uses the evolutionary information contained in protein sequence alignments. A representative example is presented, and three experiments are performed that illustrate how the appropriate representation of evolutionary relatedness can improve inferences. We explain why similar improvement can be expected in other secondary structure prediction methods and indeed any comparative sequence analysis method.     

The Monophyletic Origin of the Peridinin‐, and Fucoxanthin‐Containing Dinoflagellate Plastid Through Tertiary Replacement

The dinoflagellates contain diverse plastids of uncertain origin. To determine the origin of the peridinin‐ and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellate plastid, we sequenced the plastid‐encoded psaA, psbA, and rbcL genes from various red and dinoflagellate algae. The psbA gene phylogeny, which was made from a dataset of 15 dinoflagellates, 22 rhodophytes, five cryptophytes, seven haptophytes, seven stramenopiles, two chlorophytes, and a glaucophyte as the outgroup, supports monophyly of the peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates, as a sister group to the haptophytes. The monophyletic relationship with the haptophytes is recovered in the psbA + psaA phylogeny, with stronger support. The rubisco tree utilized the ‘Form I’ red algal type of rbcL and included fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates. The dinoflagellate + haptophyte sister relationship is also recovered in this analysis. Peridinium foliaceum is shown to group with the diatoms in all the phylogenies. Based on our analyses of plastid sequences, we postulate that: (1) the plastid of peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates originated from a common ancestor; (2) the ancestral dinoflagellate acquired its plastid from a haptophyte though a tertiary plastid replacement; (3) ‘Form II’ rubisco replaced the ancestral rbcL after the divergence of the peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates; and (4) we confirm that the plastid of P. foliaceum originated from a Stramenopiles endosymbiont.     

Informative characteristics of 12 divergent domains in complete large subunit rDNA sequences from the harmful dinoflagellate genus, Alexandrium (Dinophyceae)

The genus Alexandrium includes organisms of interest, both for the study of dinoflagellate evolution and for their impacts as toxic algae affecting human health and fisheries. Only partial large subunit (LSU) rDNA sequences of Alexandrium and other dinoflagellates are available, although they contain much genetic information. Here, we report complete LSU rDNA sequences from 11 strains of Alexandrium, including Alexandrium affine, Alexandrium catenella, Alexandrium fundyense, Alexandrium minutum, and Alexandrium tamarense, and discuss their segmented domains and structure. Putative LSU rRNA coding regions were recorded to be around 3,400 bp long. Their GC content (about 43.7%) is among the lowest when compared with other organisms. Furthermore, no AT-rich regions were found in Alexandrium LSU rDNA, although a low GC content was recorded within the LSU rDNA. No intron-like sequences were found. The secondary structure of the LSU rDNA and parsimony analyses showed that most variation in LSU rDNA is found in the divergent (D) domains with the D2 region being the most informative. This high D domain variability can allow members of the diverse Alexandrium genus to be categorized at the species level. In addition, phylogenetic analysis of the alveolate group using the complete LSU sequences strongly supported previous findings that the dinoflagellates and apicomplexans form a clade.     

Initial evidence of functional siRNA machinery in dinoflagellates

Dinoflagellates are a major group of protists widely distributed in the aquatic environments. Many species in this lineage are able to form harmful algal blooms (HAB), some even producing toxins, making this phylum the most important contributors of HAB in the marine ecosystem. Despite the ecological importance, the molecular mechanisms underpinning the basic biology and HAB formation of dinoflagellates are poorly understood. While the high-throughput sequencing studies have documented a large and growing number of genes in dinoflagellates, their functions remained to be experimentally proven using a functional genetic tool. Unfortunately, no such tool is yet available. This study was aimed to adopt the RNA interference (RNAi) gene-silencing tool for dinoflagellate research, and to investigate the potential effects of RNAi-based silencing of proton-pump rhodopsin and CO₂-fixing enzyme Rubisco encoding genes in dinoflagellates. It was found that RNAi treatment caused a significant decrease in growth rate in both species. Compared with the non- endogenous target (GFP-siRNA) and the blank control, RNAi treatments also suppressed the expression of the target genes. These results constitute the first experimental evidence of the existence and operation of siRNA in two species of dinoflagellates, present initial evidence that dinoflagellate rhodopsins are functional as a supplemental energy acquisition mechanism, and provide technical information for future functional genetic research on dinoflagellates.