The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments.

HSSP is a derived database merging structural (3-D) and sequence (1-D) information. For each protein of known 3-D structure from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), the database has a multiple sequence alignment of all available homologues and a sequence profile characteristic of the family. The list of homologues is the result of a database search in SwissProt using a position-weighted dynamic programming method for sequence profile alignment (MaxHom). The database is updated frequently. The listed homologues are very likely to have the same 3-D structure as the PDB protein to which they have been aligned. As a result, the database is not only a database of aligned sequence families, but also a database of implied secondary and tertiary structures covering 29% of all SwissProt-stored sequences.     

The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments.

HSSP is a derived database merging structural three dimensional (3-D) and sequence one dimensional(1-D) information. For each protein of known 3-D structure from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), the database has a multiple sequence alignment of all available homologues and a sequence profile characteristic of the family. The list of homologues is the result of a database search in Swissprot using a position-weighted dynamic programming method for sequence profile alignment (MaxHom). The database is updated frequently. The listed homologues are very likely to have the same 3-D structure as the PDB protein to which they have been aligned. As a result, the database is not only a database of aligned sequence families, but also a database of implied secondary and tertiary structures covering 27% of all Swissprot-stored sequences.     

The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments.

HSSP (homology-derived structures of proteins) is a derived database merging structural (2-D and 3-D) and sequence information (1-D). For each protein of known 3D structure from the Protein Data Bank, the database has a file with all sequence homologues, properly aligned to the PDB protein. Homologues are very likely to have the same 3D structure as the PDB protein to which they have been aligned. As a result, the database is not only a database of sequence aligned sequence families, but it is also a database of implied secondary and tertiary structures.     

TMCompare: transmembrane region sequence and structure.

TMCompare is an alignment and visualization tool for comparison of sequence information for membrane proteins contained in SWISS-PROT entries, with structural information contained in PDB files. The program can be used for: detection of breaks in alpha helical structure of transmembrane regions; examination of differences in coverage between PDB and SWISS-PROT files; examination of annotation differences between PDB files and associated SWISS-PROT files; examination and comparison of assigned PDB alpha helix regions and assigned SWISS-PROT transmembrane regions in linear sequence (one letter code) format; examination of these differences in 3D using the CHIME plugin, allowing; analysis of the alpha and non-alpha content of transmembrane regions. AVAILABILITY: TMCompare is available for use through selection of a query protein via the internet (http://www.membraneproteins.org/TMCompare) CONTACT: tmcompare@membraneproteins.org     

The PSSH database of alignments between protein sequences and tertiary structures

We introduce the PSSH ('Protein Sequence-to-Structure Homologies') database derived from HSSP2, an improved version of the HSSP ('Homology-derived Secondary Structure of Proteins') database [Dodge et al. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 313-315]. Whereas each HSSP entry lists all protein sequences related to a given 3D structure, PSSH is the 'inverse', with each entry listing all structures related to a given sequence. In addition, we introduce two other derived databases: HSSPchain, in which each entry lists all sequences related to a given PDB chain, and HSSPalign, in which each entry gives details of one sequence aligned onto one PDB chain. This re-organization makes it easier to navigate from sequence to structure, and to map sequence features onto 3D structures. Currently (September 2002), PSSH provides structural information for over 400 000 protein sequences, covering 48% of SWALL and 61% of SWISS-PROT sequences; HSSPchain provides sequence information for over 25 000 PDB chains, and HSSPalign gives over 14 million sequence-to-structure alignments. The databases can be accessed via SRS 3D, an extension to the SRS system, at http://srs3d.ebi.ac.uk/.     

Integration of related sequences with protein three-dimensional structural families in an updated version of PALI database

The database of Phylogeny and ALIgnment of homologous protein structures (PALI) contains three-dimensional (3-D) structure-dependent sequence alignments as well as structure-based phylogenetic trees of protein domains in various families. The latest updated version (Release 2.1) comprises of 844 families of homologous proteins involving 3863 protein domain structures with each of these families having at least two members. Each member in a family has been structurally aligned with every other member in the same family using two proteins at a time. In addition, an alignment of multiple structures has also been performed using all the members in a family. Every family with at least three members is associated with two dendrograms, one based on a structural dissimilarity metric and the other based on similarity of topologically equivalenced residues for every pairwise alignment. Apart from these multi-member families, there are 817 single member families in the updated version of PALI. A new feature in the current release of PALI is the integration, with 3-D structural families, of sequences of homologues from the sequence databases. Alignments between homologous proteins of known 3-D structure and those without an experimentally derived structure are also provided for every family in the enhanced version of PALI. The database with several web interfaced utilities can be accessed at: http://pauling.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/~pali.     

Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment

The database of known protein three-dimensional structures can be significantly increased by the use of sequence homology, based on the following observations. (1) The database of known sequences, currently at more than 12,000 proteins, is two orders of magnitude larger than the database of known structures. (2) The currently most powerful method of predicting protein structures is model building by homology. (3) Structural homology can be inferred from the level of sequence similarity. (4) The threshold of sequence similarity sufficient for structural homology depends strongly on the length of the alignment. Here, we first quantify the relation between sequence similarity, structure similarity, and alignment length by an exhaustive survey of alignments between proteins of known structure and report a homology threshold curve as a function of alignment length. We then produce a database of homology-derived secondary structure of proteins (HSSP) by aligning to each protein of known structure all sequences deemed homologous on the basis of the threshold curve. For each known protein structure, the derived database contains the aligned sequences, secondary structure, sequence variability, and sequence profile. Tertiary structures of the aligned sequences are implied, but not modeled explicitly. The database effectively increases the number of known protein structures by a factor of five to more than 1800. The results may be useful in assessing the structural significance of matches in sequence database searches, in deriving preferences and patterns for structure prediction, in elucidating the structural role of conserved residues, and in modeling three-dimensional detail by homology.     

Recognition of remotely related structural homologues using sequence profiles of aligned homologous protein structures

In order to bridge the gap between proteins with three-dimensional (3-D) structural information and those without 3-D structures, extensive experimental and computational efforts for structure recognition are being invested. One of the rapid and simple computational approaches for structure recognition makes use of sequence profiles with sensitive profile matching procedures to identify remotely related homologous families. While adopting this approach we used profiles that are generated from structure-based sequence alignment of homologous protein domains of known structures integrated with sequence homologues. We present an assessment of this fast and simple approach. About one year ago, using this approach, we had identified structural homologues for 315 sequence families, which were not known to have any 3-D structural information. The subsequent experimental structure determination for at least one of the members in 110 of 315 sequence families allowed a retrospective assessment of the correctness of structure recognition. We demonstrate that correct folds are detected with an accuracy of 96.4% (106/110). Most (81/106) of the associations are made correctly to the specific structural family. For 23/106, the structure associations are valid at the superfamily level. Thus, profiles of protein families of known structure when used with sensitive profile-based search procedure result in structure association of high confidence. Further assignment at the level of superfamily or family would provide clues to probable functions of new proteins. Importantly, the public availability of these profiles from us could enable one to perform genome wide structure assignment in a local machine in a fast and accurate manner.     

LOC3D: annotate sub-cellular localization for protein structures

LOC3D (http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/db/LOC3d/) is both a weekly-updated database and a web server for predictions of sub-cellular localization for eukaryotic proteins of known three-dimensional (3D) structure. Localization is predicted using four different methods: (i) PredictNLS, prediction of nuclear proteins through nuclear localization signals; (ii) LOChom, inferring localization through sequence homology; (iii) LOCkey, inferring localization through automatic text analysis of SWISS-PROT keywords; and (iv) LOC3Dini, ab initio prediction through a system of neural networks and vector support machines. The final prediction is based on the method that predicts localization with the highest confidence. The LOC3D database currently contains predictions for >8700 eukaryotic protein chains taken from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The web server can be used to predict sub-cellular localization for proteins for which only a predicted structure is available from threading servers. This makes the resource of particular interest to structural genomics initiatives.     

The ProDom database of protein domain families.

The ProDom database contains protein domain families generated from the SWISS-PROT database by automated sequence comparisons. It can be searched on the World Wide Web (http://protein.toulouse.inra. fr/prodom.html ) or by E-mail (prodom@toulouse.inra.fr) to study domain arrangements within known families or new proteins. Strong emphasis has been put on the graphical user interface which allows for interactive analysis of protein homology relationships. Recent improvements to the server include: ProDom search by keyword; links to PROSITE and PDB entries; more sensitive ProDom similarity search with BLAST or WU-BLAST; alignments of query sequences with homologous ProDom domain families; and links to the SWISS-MODEL server (http: //www.expasy.ch/swissmod/SWISS-MODEL.html ) for homology based 3-D domain modelling where possible.     

PALI-a database of Phylogeny and ALIgnment of homologous protein structures

PALI (release 1.2) contains three-dimensional (3-D) structure-dependent sequence alignments as well as structure-based phylogenetic trees of homologous protein domains in various families. The data set of homologous protein structures has been derived by consulting the SCOP database (release 1.50) and the data set comprises 604 families of homologous proteins involving 2739 protein domain structures with each family made up of at least two members. Each member in a family has been structurally aligned with every other member in the same family (pairwise alignment) and all the members in the family are also aligned using simultaneous super-position (multiple alignment). The structural alignments are performed largely automatically, with manual interventions especially in the cases of distantly related proteins, using the program STAMP (version 4.2). Every family is also associated with two dendrograms, calculated using PHYLIP (version 3.5), one based on a structural dissimilarity metric defined for every pairwise alignment and the other based on similarity of topologically equivalent residues. These dendrograms enable easy comparison of sequence and structure-based relationships among the members in a family. Structure-based alignments with the details of structural and sequence similarities, superposed coordinate sets and dendrograms can be accessed conveniently using a web interface. The database can be queried for protein pairs with sequence or structural similarities falling within a specified range. Thus PALI forms a useful resource to help in analysing the relationship between sequence and structure variation at a given level of sequence similarity. PALI also contains over 653 'orphans' (single member families). Using the web interface involving PSI_BLAST and PHYLIP it is possible to associate the sequence of a new protein with one of the families in PALI and generate a phylogenetic tree combining the query sequence and proteins of known 3-D structure. The database with the web interfaced search and dendrogram generation tools can be accessed at http://pauling.mbu.iisc.ernet. in/ approximately pali.     

Conserved key amino acid positions (CKAAPs) derived from the analysis of common substructures in proteins

An all-against-all protein structure comparison using the Combinatorial Extension (CE) algorithm applied to a representative set of PDB structures revealed a gallery of common substructures in proteins (http://cl.sdsc.edu/ce.html). These substructures represent commonly identified folds, domains, or components thereof. Most of the subsequences forming these similar substructures have no significant sequence similarity. We present a method to identify conserved amino acid positions and residue-dependent property clusters within these subsequences starting with structure alignments. Each of the subsequences is aligned to its homologues in SWALL, a nonredundant protein sequence database. The most similar sequences are purged into a common frequency matrix, and weighted homologues of each one of the subsequences are used in scoring for conserved key amino acid positions (CKAAPs). We have set the top 20% of the high-scoring positions in each substructure to be CKAAPs. It is hypothesized that CKAAPs may be responsible for the common folding patterns in either a local or global view of the protein-folding pathway. Where a significant number of structures exist, CKAAPs have also been identified in structure alignments of complete polypeptide chains from the same protein family or superfamily. Evidence to support the presence of CKAAPs comes from other computational approaches and experimental studies of mutation and protein-folding experiments, notably the Paracelsus challenge. Finally, the structural environment of CKAAPs versus non-CKAAPs is examined for solvent accessibility, hydrogen bonding, and secondary structure. The identification of CKAAPs has important implications for protein engineering, fold recognition, modeling, and structure prediction studies and is dependent on the availability of structures and an accurate structure alignment methodology. Proteins 2001;42:148-163.     

Use of multiple profiles corresponding to a sequence alignment enables effective detection of remote homologues

MOTIVATION: Position specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) corresponding to aligned sequences of homologous proteins are commonly used in homology detection. A PSSM is generated on the basis of one of the homologues as a reference sequence, which is the query in the case of PSI-BLAST searches. The reference sequence is chosen arbitrarily while generating PSSMs for reverse BLAST searches. In this work we demonstrate that the use of multiple PSSMs corresponding to a given alignment and variable reference sequences is more effective than using traditional single PSSMs and hidden Markov models. RESULTS: Searches for proteins with known 3-D structures have been made against three databases of protein family profiles corresponding to known structures: (1) One PSSM per family; (2) multiple PSSMs corresponding to an alignment and variable reference sequences for every family; and (3) hidden Markov models. A comparison of the performances of these three approaches suggests that the use of multiple PSSMs is most effective. CONTACT: ns@mbu.iisc.ernet.in.     

SMS 2.0: an updated database to study the structural plasticity of short peptide fragments in non-redundant proteins

The function of a protein molecule is greatly influenced by its three-dimensional (3D) structure and therefore structure prediction will help identify its biological function. We have updated Sequence, Motif and Structure (SMS), the database of structurally rigid peptide fragments, by combining amino acid sequences and the corre-sponding 3D atomic coordinates of non-redundant (25%) and redundant (90%) protein chains available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). SMS 2.0 provides information pertaining to the peptide fragments of length 5-14 resi-dues. The entire dataset is divided into three categories, namely, same sequence motifs having similar, intermedi-ate or dissimilar 3D structures. Further, options are provided to facilitate structural superposition using the pro-gram structural alignment of multiple proteins (STAMP) and the popular JAVA plug-in (Jmol) is deployed for visualization. In addition, functionalities are provided to search for the occurrences of the sequence motifs in other structural and sequence databases like PDB, Genome Database (GDB), Protein Information Resource (PIR) and Swiss-Prot. The updated database along with the search engine is available over the World Wide Web through the following URL http://cluster.physics.iisc.ernet.in/sms/.     

The PAS fold. A redefinition of the PAS domain based upon structural prediction.

In the postgenomic era it is essential that protein sequences are annotated correctly in order to help in the assignment of their putative functions. Over 1300 proteins in current protein sequence databases are predicted to contain a PAS domain based upon amino acid sequence alignments. One of the problems with the current annotation of the PAS domain is that this domain exhibits limited similarity at the amino acid sequence level. It is therefore essential, when using proteins with low-sequence similarities, to apply profile hidden Markov model searches for the PAS domain-containing proteins, as for the PFAM database. From recent 3D X-ray and NMR structures, however, PAS domains appear to have a conserved 3D fold as shown here by structural alignment of the six representative 3D-structures from the PDB database. Large-scale modelling of the PAS sequences from the PFAM database against the 3D-structures of these six structural prototypes was performed. All 3D models generated (> 5700) were evaluated using prosaii. We conclude from our large-scale modelling studies that the PAS and PAC motifs (which are separately defined in the PFAM database) are directly linked and that these two motifs form the PAS fold. The existing subdivision in PAS and PAC motifs, as used by the PFAM and SMART databases, appears to be caused by major differences in sequences in the region connecting these two motifs. This region, as has been shown by Gardner and coworkers for human PAS kinase (Amezcua, C.A., Harper, S.M., Rutter, J. & Gardner, K.H. (2002) Structure 10, 1349-1361, [1]), is very flexible and adopts different conformations depending on the bound ligand. Some PAS sequences present in the PFAM database did not produce a good structural model, even after realignment using a structure-based alignment method, suggesting that these representatives are unlikely to have a fold resembling any of the structural prototypes of the PAS domain superfamily.     

SUPFAM: A database of sequence superfamilies of protein domains

Background  

SUPFAM database is a compilation of superfamily relationships between protein domain families of either known or unknown 3-D structure. In SUPFAM, sequence families from Pfam and structural families from SCOP are associated, using profile matching, to result in sequence superfamilies of known structure. Subsequently all-against-all family profile matches are made to deduce a list of new potential superfamilies of yet unknown structure.     

Beyond the Twilight Zone: Automated prediction of structural properties of proteins by recursive neural networks and remote homology information

The prediction of 1D structural properties of proteins is an important step toward the prediction of protein structure and function, not only in the ab initio case but also when homology information to known structures is available. Despite this the vast majority of 1D predictors do not incorporate homology information into the prediction process. We develop a novel structural alignment method, SAMD, which we use to build alignments of putative remote homologues that we compress into templates of structural frequency profiles. We use these templates as additional input to ensembles of recursive neural networks, which we specialise for the prediction of query sequences that show only remote homology to any Protein Data Bank structure. We predict four 1D structural properties – secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility, backbone structural motifs, and contact density. Secondary structure prediction accuracy, tested by five‐fold cross‐validation on a large set of proteins allowing less than 25% sequence identity between training and test set and query sequences and templates, exceeds 82%, outperforming its ab initio counterpart, other state‐of‐the‐art secondary structure predictors (Jpred 3 and PSIPRED) and two other systems based on PSI‐BLAST and COMPASS templates. We show that structural information from homologues improves prediction accuracy well beyond the Twilight Zone of sequence similarity, even below 5% sequence identity, for all four structural properties. Significant improvement over the extraction of structural information directly from PDB templates suggests that the combination of sequence and template information is more informative than templates alone. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs

MOTIVATION: The best quality multiple sequence alignments are generally considered to derive from structural superposition. However, no previous work has studied the relative performance of profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) derived from such alignments. Therefore several alignment methods have been used to generate multiple sequence alignments from 348 structurally aligned families in the HOMSTRAD database. The performance of profile HMMs derived from the structural and sequence-based alignments has been assessed for homologue detection. RESULTS: The best alignment methods studied here correctly align nearly 80% of residues with respect to structure alignments. Alignment quality and model sensitivity are found to be dependent on average number, length, and identity of sequences in the alignment. The striking conclusion is that, although structural data may improve the quality of multiple sequence alignments, this does not add to the ability of the derived profile HMMs to find sequence homologues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A list of HOMSTRAD families used in this study and the corresponding Pfam families is available at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Users/sgj/alignments/map.html Contact: sgj@sanger.ac.uk     

Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles

Customary practice in predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes is employment of various docking methods when the structures of separate monomers are known a priori. The alternative approach, i.e. the template-based prediction with pure sequence information as a starting point, is still considered as being inferior mostly due to presumption that the pool of available structures of protein-protein complexes, which can serve as putative templates, is not sufficiently large. Recently, however, several labs have developed databases containing thousands of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes, which enable statistically reliable testing of homology-based algorithms. In this paper we report the results on homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. The method, called HOMology-BAsed COmplex Prediction (HOMBACOP), has two distinctive features: (I) extra weight on aligning interfacial residues in the dynamical programming algorithm, and (II) increased gap penalties for the interfacial segments. The method was tested against our recently developed ProtCom database and against the Boston University protein-protein BENCHMARK. In both cases, models generated were compared to the models built on basis of customarily protein structure initiative (PSI)-BLAST sequence alignments. It was found that existence of homologous (by the means of PSI-BLAST) templates (44% of cases) enables both methods to produce models of good quality, with the profiles method outperforming the PSI-BLAST models (with respect to the percentage of correctly predicted residues on the complex interface and fraction of native interfacial contacts). The models were evaluated according to the CAPRI assessment criteria and about two thirds of the models were found to fall into acceptable and medium-quality categories. The same comparison of a larger set of 463 protein complexes showed again that profiles generate better models. We further demonstrate, using our ProtCom database, the suitability of the profile alignment algorithm in detecting remote homologues between query and template sequences, where the PSI-BLAST method fails.