Engineering the phosphoinositide-binding profile of a class I pleckstrin homology domain

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains are protein modules that bind with varying degrees of affinity and specificity membrane phosphoinositides. Previously we have shown that although the PH domains of the Ras GTPase-activating proteins GAP1m and GAP1IP4BP are 63% identical at the amino acid level they possess distinct phosphoinositide-binding profiles. The GAP1m PH domain binds phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P3), whereas the domain from GAP1IP4BP binds PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) equally well. These phosphoinositide specificities are translated into distinct subcellular localizations. GAP1m is cytosolic and undergoes a rapid PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent association with the plasma membrane following growth factor stimulation. In contrast, GAP1IP4BP is constitutively associated, in a PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent manner, with the plasma membrane (Cozier, G. E., Lockyer, P. J., Reynolds, J. S., Kupzig, S., Bottomley, J. R., Millard, T., Banting, G., and Cullen, P. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28261-28268). In the present study, we have used molecular modeling to identify residues in the GAP1IP4BP PH domain predicted to be required for high affinity binding to PtdIns(4,5)P2. This has allowed the isolation of a mutant, GAP1IP4BP-(K591T), which while retaining high affinity for PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 has a 6-fold reduction in its affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P2. Importantly, GAP1IP4BP-(K591T) is predominantly localized to the cytosol and undergoes a PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent association with the plasma membrane following growth factor stimulation. We have therefore engineered the phosphoinositide-binding profile of the GAP1IP4BP PH domain, thereby emphasizing that subtle changes in PH domain structure can have a pronounced effect on phosphoinositide binding and the subcellular localization of GAP1IP4BP.     

GAP1IP4BP contains a novel group I pleckstrin homology domain that directs constitutive plasma membrane association

The group I family of pleckstrin homology (PH) domains are characterized by their inherent ability to specifically bind phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3)) and its corresponding inositol head-group inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (Ins(1,3,4,5)P(4)). In vivo this interaction results in the regulated plasma membrane recruitment of cytosolic group I PH domain-containing proteins following agonist-stimulated PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) production. Among group I PH domain-containing proteins, the Ras GTPase-activating protein GAP1(IP4BP) is unique in being constitutively associated with the plasma membrane. Here we show that, although the GAP1(IP4BP) PH domain interacts with PtdIns(3,4, 5)P(3), it also binds, with a comparable affinity, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P(2)) (K(d) values of 0.5 +/- 0.2 and 0.8 +/- 0.5 microm, respectively). Intriguingly, whereas this binding site overlaps with that for Ins(1,3,4,5)P(4), consistent with the constitutive plasma membrane association of GAP1(IP4BP) resulting from its PH domain-binding PtdIns(4,5)P(2), we show that in vivo depletion of PtdIns(4,5)P(2), but not PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3), results in dissociation of GAP1(IP4BP) from this membrane. Thus, the Ins(1,3,4,5)P(4)-binding PH domain from GAP1(IP4BP) defines a novel class of group I PH domains that constitutively targets the protein to the plasma membrane and may allow GAP1(IP4BP) to be regulated in vivo by Ins(1,3,4,5)P(4) rather than PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3).     

GAP1 family members constitute bifunctional Ras and Rap GTPase-activating proteins

GAP1(IP4BP) is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (Ras GAPs) that includes GAP1(m), CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP domain, surrounded by amino-terminal C(2) domains and a carboxyl-terminal pleckstrin homology/Bruton's tyrosine kinase domain, GAP1(IP4BP) has previously been shown to possess an unexpected GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap, besides the predicted Ras GAP activity (Cullen, P. J., Hsuan, J. J., Truong, O., Letcher, A. J., Jackson, T. R., Dawson, A. P., and Irvine, R. F. (1995) Nature 376, 527-530). Here we have shown that GAP1(IP4BP) is indeed an efficient Ras/Rap GAP, having K(m)s of 213 and 42 microm and estimated k(cat)s of 48 and 16 s(-1) for Ras and Rap, respectively. For this dual activity, regions outside the Ras GAP domain are required, as the isolated domain (residues 291-569) retains a pronounced Ras GAP activity yet has very low activity toward Rap. Interestingly, mutagenesis of the Ras GAP arginine finger, and surrounding residues important in Ras binding, inhibit both Ras and Rap GAP activity of GAP1(IP4BP). Although the precise details by which GAP1(IP4BP) can function as a Rap GAP remain to be determined, these data are consistent with Rap associating with GAP1(IP4BP) through the Ras-binding site within the Ras GAP domain. Finally, we have established that such dual Ras/Rap GAP activity is not restricted to GAP1(IP4BP). Although GAP1(m) appears to constitute a specific Ras GAP, CAPRI and RASAL display dual activity. For CAPRI, its Rap GAP activity is modulated upon its Ca(2+)-induced association with the plasma membrane.     

Identification of the ras GTPase-activating protein GAP1(m) as a phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate-binding protein in vivo

GAP1(m) is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) [1]. In vitro, it has been shown to bind inositol 1, 3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (IP4), the water-soluble inositol head group of the lipid second messenger phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate (PIP3) [2] [3]. This has led to the suggestion that GAP1(m) might function as a PIP3 receptor in vivo [4]. Here, using rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells transiently transfected with a plasmid expressing a chimera of green fluorescent protein fused to GAP1(m) (GFP-GAP1(m)), we show that epidermal growth factor (EGF) induces a rapid (less than 60 seconds) recruitment of GFP-GAP1(m) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. This recruitment required a functional GAP1(m) pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, because a specific point mutation (R629C) in the PH domain that inhibits IP4 binding in vitro [5] totally blocked EGF-induced GAP1(m) translocation. Furthermore, the membrane translocation was dependent on PI 3-kinase, and the time course of translocation paralleled the rate by which EGF stimulates the generation of plasma membrane PIP3 [6]. Significantly, the PIP3-induced recruitment of GAP1(m) did not appear to result in any detectable enhancement in its basal Ras GAP activity. From these results, we conclude that GAP1(m) binds PIP3 in vivo, and it is recruited to the plasma membrane, but does not appear to be activated, following agonist stimulation of PI 3-kinase.     

Tissue-specific expression and endogenous subcellular distribution of the inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate-binding proteins GAP1(IP4BP) and GAP1(m)

GAP1(IP4BP) and GAP1(m) belong to the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins that are candidate InsP4 receptors. Here we show they are ubiquitously expressed in human tissues and are likely to have tissue-specific splice variants. Analysis by subcellular fractionation of RBL-2H3 rat basophilic leukemia cells confirms that endogenous GAP1(IP4BP) is primarily localised to the plasma membrane, whereas GAP1(m) appears localised to the cytoplasm (cytosol and internal membranes) but not the plasma membrane. Subcellular fractionation did not indicate a specific co-localisation between membrane-bound GAP1(m) and several Ca2+ store markers, consistent with the lack of co-localisation between GAP1(m) and SERCA1 upon co-expression in COS-7 cells. This difference suggests that GAP1(m) does not reside at a site where it could regulate the ability of InsP4 to release intracellular Ca2+. As GAP1(m) is primarily localised to the cytosol of unstimulated cells it may be spatially regulated in order to interact with Ras at the plasma membrane.     

Distinct specificity in the recognition of phosphoinositides by the pleckstrin homology domains of dynamin and Bruton's tyrosine kinase.

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains may act as membrane localization modules through specific interactions with phosphoinositide phospholipids. These interactions could represent responses to second messengers, with scope for regulation by soluble inositol polyphosphates. A biosensor-based assay was used here to probe interactions between PH domains and unilamellar liposomes containing different phospholipids and to demonstrate specificity for distinct phosphoinositides. The dynamin PH domain specifically interacted with liposomes containing phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] and, more weakly, with liposomes containing phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate [PI(4)P]. This correlates with phosphoinositide activation of the dynamin GTPase. The functional GTPase of a dynamin mutant lacking the PH domain, however, cannot be activated by PI(4,5)P2. The phosphoinositide-PH domain interaction can be abolished selectively by point mutations in the putative binding pocket predicted by molecular modelling and NMR spectroscopy. In contrast, the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk)PH domain specifically bound liposomes containing phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate [PI(3,4,5)P3]: an interaction requiring Arg28, a residue found to be mutated in some X-linked agammaglobulinaemia patients. A rational explanation for these different specificities is proposed through modelling of candidate binding pockets and is supported by NMR spectroscopy.     

Phosphoinositide-dependent activation of the ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein ASAP1. Evidence for the pleckstrin homology domain functioning as an allosteric site

The ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) family of GTP-binding proteins are regulators of membrane traffic and the actin cytoskeleton. Both negative and positive regulators of Arf, the centaurin beta family of Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and Arf guanine nucleotide exchange factors, contain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and are activated by phosphoinositides. To understand how the activities are coordinated, we have examined the role of phosphoinositide binding for Arf GAP function using ASAP1/centaurin beta4 as a model. In contrast to Arf exchange factors, phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate (PtdIns-4,5-P(2)) specifically activated Arf GAP. D3 phosphorylated phosphoinositides were less effective. Activation involved PtdIns-4,5-P(2) binding to the PH domain; however, in contrast to the Arf exchange factors and contrary to predictions based on the current paradigm for PH domains as independently functioning recruitment signals, we found the following: (i) the PH domain was dispensable for targeting to PDGF-induced ruffles; (ii) activation and recruitment could be uncoupled; (iii) the PH domain was necessary for activity even in the absence of phospholipids; and (iv) the Arf GAP domain influenced localization and lipid binding of the PH domain. Furthermore, PtdIns-4,5-P(2) binding to the PH domain caused a conformational change in the Arf GAP domain detected by limited proteolysis. Thus, these data demonstrate that PH domains can function as allosteric sites. In addition, differences from the published properties of the Arf exchange factors suggest a model in which feedforward and feedback loops involving lipid metabolites coordinate GTP binding and hydrolysis by Arf.     

Investigating the role played by protein-lipid and protein-protein interactions in the membrane association of the p120GAP CaLB domain.

The GTPase activating protein, p120GAP, contains an amino acid sequence motif called the Ca2+-dependent lipid binding domain (CaLB) which mediates a protein-protein interaction between p120GAP and annexin VI and also binds to negatively charged phospholipids. Because membrane association of p120GAP is important for the regulation of p21 Ras activity, we have studied the roles played by Ca2+, phospholipids and annexin VI in the membrane association of p120GAP. Here we demonstrate that a truncated CaLB domain GST fusion protein (GSTGAP618-632), lacking the ability to bind to phospholipids, is able to bind to rat fibroblast membranes in a Ca2+- and concentration-dependent manner. In addition, this fusion protein also binds to annexin VI in an amino acid sequence specific but Ca2+ independent manner. Also, when bound to annexin VI in the presence of Ca2+, this fusion protein has the ability to co-bind to phosphatidylserine vesicles. Thus, annexin VI may simultaneously mediate an interaction with p120GAP and also an interaction with membrane phospholipids. This may in part explain the mechanism by which p120GAP associates with membranes in response to Ca2+ elevation and suggests the potential importance of annexin VI in the regulation of p21 Ras and the role CaLB domains may play in the specific recognition of cellular membranes.     

Dynamic interaction between Arf GAP and PH domains of ASAP1 in the regulation of GAP activity

ASAP family Arf GAPs induce the hydrolysis of GTP bound to the Ras superfamily protein Arf1, regulate cell adhesion and migration and have been implicated in carcinogenesis. The ASAP proteins have a core catalytic domain of PH, Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains. The PH domain is necessary for both biological and catalytic functions of ASAP1 and has been proposed to be integrally folded with the Arf GAP domain. Protection studies and analytical ultracentrifugation studies previously reported indicated that the domains are, at least partly, folded together. Here, using NMR spectroscopy and biochemical analysis, we have further tested this hypothesis and characterized the interdomain interaction. A comparison of NMR spectra of three recombinant proteins comprised of either the isolated PH domain of ASAP1, the Arf GAP and ankyrin repeat domain or all three domains indicated that the PH domain did interact with the Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains; however, we found a significant amount of dynamic independence between the PH and Arf GAP domains, consistent with the interactions being transient. In contrast, the Arf GAP and Ank repeat domains form a relatively rigid structure. The PH-Arf GAP domain interaction partially occluded the phosphoinositide binding site in the soluble protein, but binding studies indicated the PIP2 binding site was accessible in ASAP1 bound to a lipid bilayer surface. Phosphoinositide binding altered the conformation of the PH domain, but had little effect on the structure of the Arf GAP domain. Mutations in a loop of the PH domain that contacts the Arf GAP domain affected PIP2 binding and the K(m) and k(cat) for converting Arf1 GTP to Arf1 GDP. Based on these results, we generated a homology model of a composite PH/Arf GAP/Ank repeat domain structure. We propose that the PH domain contributes to Arf GAP activity by either binding to or positioning Arf1 GTP that is simultaneously bound to the Arf GAP domain.     

Phosphoinositide binding by the pleckstrin homology domains of Ipl and Tih1

The Ipl protein consists of a single pleckstrin homology (PH) domain with short N- and C-terminal extensions. This protein is highly conserved among vertebrates, and it acts to limit placental growth in mice. However, its biochemical function is unknown. The closest paralogue of Ipl is Tih1, another small PH domain protein. By sequence comparisons, Ipl and Tih1 define an outlying branch of the PH domain superfamily. Here we describe phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PIP) binding by these proteins. Ipl and Tih1 bind to immobilized PIPs with moderate affinity, but this binding is weaker and more promiscuous than that of prototypical PH domains from the general receptor for phosphoinositides (GRP1), phospholipase C delta1, and dual adaptor for phosphoinositides and phosphotyrosine 1. In COS7 cells exposed to epidermal growth factor, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Ipl and GFP-Tih1 accumulate at membrane ruffles without clearing from the cytoplasm, whereas control GFP-GRP1 translocates rapidly to the plasma membrane and clears from the cytoplasm. Ras*-Ipl and Ras*-Tih1 fusion proteins both rescue cdc25ts Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but Ras*-Ipl rescues more efficiently in the presence of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), whereas PI3K-independent rescue is more efficient with Ras*-Tih1. Site-directed mutagenesis defines amino acids in the beta1-loop1-beta2 regions of Ipl and Tih1 as essential for growth rescue in this assay. Thus, Ipl and Tih1 are bona fide PH domain proteins, with broad specificity and moderate affinity for PIPs.     

A BAR domain in the N terminus of the Arf GAP ASAP1 affects membrane structure and trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor

BACKGROUND: Arf GAPs are multidomain proteins that function in membrane traffic by inactivating the GTP binding protein Arf1. Numerous Arf GAPs contain a BAR domain, a protein structural element that contributes to membrane traffic by either inducing or sensing membrane curvature. We have examined the role of a putative BAR domain in the function of the Arf GAP ASAP1. RESULTS: ASAP1's N terminus, containing the putative BAR domain together with a PH domain, dimerized to form an extended structure that bound to large unilamellar vesicles containing acidic phospholipids, properties that define a BAR domain. A recombinant protein containing the BAR domain of ASAP1, together with the PH and Arf GAP domains, efficiently bent the surface of large unilamellar vesicles, resulting in the formation of tubular structures. This activity was regulated by Arf1*GTP binding to the Arf GAP domain. In vivo, the tubular structures induced by ASAP1 mutants contained epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Rab11, and ASAP1 colocalized in tubular structures with EGFR during recycling of receptor. Expression of ASAP1 accelerated EGFR trafficking and slowed cell spreading. An ASAP1 mutant lacking the BAR domain had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: The N-terminal BAR domain of ASAP1 mediates membrane bending and is necessary for ASAP1 function. The Arf dependence of the bending activity is consistent with ASAP1 functioning as an Arf effector.     

RACK1, a protein kinase C scaffolding protein, interacts with the PH domain of p120GAP

The Ras GTPase-activating protein p120GAP is a multidomain protein consisting of a variety of noncatalytic domains that may be involved in its regulation. RACK1 is a membrane-associated protein that binds the C2 domain of PKC and is related in sequence to the beta subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins which has been implicated in binding to PH domains. Because p120GAP contains both PH and C2/CaLB domains we determined whether it is also a RACK1 binding protein. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that p120GAP associates with RACK1, whereas PH or C2/CaLB domain deletion mutants do not. A fusion protein containing the GAP PH domain bound to endogenous RACK1 in lysates in a concentration-dependent manner and directly associated with recombinant RACK1. Finally, serine/threonine phosphorylation appears to be involved in regulating this association. These results suggest that p120GAP and RACK1 interact in vivo in a manner dependent upon both the PH and C2/CaLB domains of GAP.     

The role of Gln61 and Glu63 of Ras GTPases in their activation by NF1 and Ras GAP.

Two distinct GAPs of 120 and 235 kDa called GAP1 and NF1 serve as attenuators of Ras, a member of GTP-dependent signal transducers, by stimulating its intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. The GAP1 (also called Ras GAP) is highly specific for Ras and does not stimulate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rap1 or Rho. Using GAP1C, the C-terminal GTPase activating domain (residues 720-1044) of bovine GAP1, we have shown previously that the GAP1 specificity is determined by the Ras domain (residues 61-65) where Gln61 plays the primary role. The corresponding domain (residues 1175-1531) of human NF1 (called NF1C), which shares only 26% sequence identity with the GAP1C, also activates Ras GTPases. In this article, we demonstrate that the NF1C, like the GAP1C, is highly specific for Ras and does not activate either Rap1 or Rho GTPases. Furthermore, using a series of chimeric Ras/Rap1 and mutated Ras GTPases, we show that Gln at position 61 of the GTPases primarily determines that NF1C as well as GAP1C activates Ras GTPases, but not Rap1 GTPases, and Glu at position 63 of the GTPases is required for maximizing the sensitivity of Ras GTPases to both NF1C and GAP1C. Interestingly, replacement of Glu63 of c-HaRas by Lys reduces its intrinsic GTPase activity and abolishes the GTPase activation by both NF1C and GAP1C. Thus, the potentiation of oncogenicity by Lys63 mutation of c-HaRas appears primarily to be due to the loss of its sensitivity to the two major Ras signal attenuators (NF1 and GAP1).     

Phospholipid binding properties and functional characterization of a sea urchin phospholipase Cdelta in urchin and mouse eggs

We recently identified a novel phospholipase Cdelta isoform, PLC-deltasu, in sea urchin gametes, whose precise functional role during fertilization and early embryogenesis remains unknown. Here, we characterized the binding of the PLC-deltasu PH domain to different phosphatidylinositol (PI) phospholipids and studied changes in its localization during fertilization. The PLC-deltasu PH domain bound most strongly to PI(3,4)P(2) and PI(3,5)P(2) phospholipids, in contrast to the PLCdelta1 PH domain which bound predominantly to PI(4,5)P(2). A green fluorescent protein tagged PLC-deltasu PH domain localized to the plasma membrane and its localization increased at fertilization and following addition of a Ca(2+) ionophore. However, recombinant PLC-deltasu failed to cause Ca(2+) signals like those seen at fertilization, in mouse and sea urchin eggs. Our findings suggest that PLC-deltasu is unlikely to be directly involved in the process of egg activation but may play a role in mediating extracellular signals transmitted via the PI 3'-kinase pathway.     

Membrane docking geometry of GRP1 PH domain bound to a target lipid bilayer: an EPR site-directed spin-labeling and relaxation study

The second messenger lipid PIP(3) (phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate) is generated by the lipid kinase PI3K (phosphoinositide-3-kinase) in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, where it regulates a broad array of cell processes by recruiting multiple signaling proteins containing PIP(3)-specific pleckstrin homology (PH) domains to the membrane surface. Despite the broad importance of PIP(3)-specific PH domains, the membrane docking geometry of a PH domain bound to its target PIP(3) lipid on a bilayer surface has not yet been experimentally determined. The present study employs EPR site-directed spin labeling and relaxation methods to elucidate the membrane docking geometry of GRP1 PH domain bound to bilayer-embedded PIP(3). The model target bilayer contains the neutral background lipid PC and both essential targeting lipids: (i) PIP(3) target lipid that provides specificity and affinity, and (ii) PS facilitator lipid that enhances the PIP(3) on-rate via an electrostatic search mechanism. The EPR approach measures membrane depth parameters for 18 function-retaining spin labels coupled to the PH domain, and for calibration spin labels coupled to phospholipids. The resulting depth parameters, together with the known high resolution structure of the co-complex between GRP1 PH domain and the PIP(3) headgroup, provide sufficient constraints to define an optimized, self-consistent membrane docking geometry. In this optimized geometry the PH domain engulfs the PIP(3) headgroup with minimal bilayer penetration, yielding the shallowest membrane position yet described for a lipid binding domain. This binding interaction displaces the PIP(3) headgroup from its lowest energy position and orientation in the bilayer, but the headgroup remains within its energetically accessible depth and angular ranges. Finally, the optimized docking geometry explains previous biophysical findings including mutations observed to disrupt membrane binding, and the rapid lateral diffusion observed for PIP(3)-bound GRP1 PH domain on supported lipid bilayers.     

Regulation of ASAP1 by phospholipids is dependent on the interface between the PH and Arf GAP domains

ASAP1 is an Arf GAP with a PH domain immediately N-terminal to the catalytic Arf GAP domain. PH domains are thought to regulate enzymes by binding to specific phosphoinositide lipids in membranes, thereby recruiting the enzyme to a site of action. Here, we have examined the functional relationship between the PH and Arf GAP domains. We found that GAP activity requires the cognate PH domain of ASAP1, leading us to hypothesize that the Arf GAP and PH domains directly interact to form the substrate binding site. This hypothesis was supported by the combined results of protection and hydrodynamic studies. We then examined the role of the PH domain in the regulation of Arf GAP activity. The results of saturation kinetics, limited proteolysis, FRET and fluorescence spectrometry support a model in which regulation of the GAP activity of ASAP1 involves a conformational change coincident with recruitment to a membrane surface, and a second conformational change following the specific binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate.     

Distinct subcellular localisations of the putative inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate receptors GAP1 and GAP1 result from the GAP1 PH domain directing plasma membrane targeting

Inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (IP₄), is a ubiquitous inositol phosphate that has been suggested to function as a second messenger. Recently, we purified and cloned a putative IP₄ receptor, termed GAP1^IP4BP[1], which is also a member of the GAP1 family of GTPase-activating proteins for the Ras family of GTPases. A homologue of GAP1^IP4BP, called GAP1^m, has been identified [2] and here we describe the cloning of a GAP1^m cDNA from a human circulating-blood cDNA library. We found that a deletion mutant of GAP1^m, in which the putative phospholipid-binding domains (C2A and C2B) have been removed, binds to IP₄ with a similar affinity and specificity to that of the corresponding GAP1^IP4BP mutant. Expression studies of the proteins in either COS-7 or HeLa cells showed that, whereas GAP1^IP4BP is located solely at the plasma membrane, GAP1^m seems to have a distinct perinuclear localisation. By mutational analysis, we have shown that the contrast in subcellular distribution of these two closely related proteins may be a function of their respective pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. This difference in localisation has fundamental significance for our understanding of the second messenger functions of IP₄.     

Fcepsilon RI control of Ras via inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase and inositol tetrakisphosphate

The inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase (ITP3K) phosphorylates Ins (1,4,5) P3 to produce Ins (1,3,4,5) P4. The ITP3K substrate, InsP3, and its product, InsP4, both have the potential to regulate mast cell function. Here, we explore the effects of dominant inhibition of ITP3K upon secretory responses and Ras GTPase activation following antigenic cross-linking of the mast cell immunoreceptor, FcvarepsilonRI. Inhibition of ITP3K potentiates both calcium release from intracellular stores and calcium-dependent secretory responses in mast cells. Moreover, mast cells with dominantly inhibited ITP3K display constitutive activation of Ras and certain Ras effector pathways. We propose three mechanisms by which ITP3K inhibition could influence Ras activation. The protection of InsP3 that results from ITP3K inhibition may lead to enhanced activation of calcium-sensitive Ras-GAPs or -GRFs. Similarly, the deficit in InsP4 may change the behavior of the InsP4 receptor, the GAP1(IP4BP). Our data are inconsistent with calcium-sensitive Ras-GAP activation being the primary consequence of ITP3K inhibition in mast cells. Rather, we observe potentiation of Ras responses in mast cells transfected with dominant negative GAP1(IP4BP). Moreover, shRNA-mediated knockdown of GAP1(IP4BP) potentiates FcvarepsilonRI-mediated Ras activation, indicating that this InsP4-binding GAP protein may be used by the FcvarepsilonRI immunoreceptor to regulate Ras.     

GTP-binding protein-like domain of AGAP1 is protein binding site that allosterically regulates ArfGAP protein catalytic activity

AGAPs are a subtype of Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) with 11 members in humans. In addition to the Arf GAP domain, the proteins contain a G-protein-like domain (GLD) with homology to Ras superfamily proteins and a PH domain. AGAPs bind to clathrin adaptors, function in post Golgi membrane traffic, and have been implicated in glioblastoma. The regulation of AGAPs is largely unexplored. Other enzymes containing GTP binding domains are regulated by nucleotide binding. However, nucleotide binding to AGAPs has not been detected. Here, we found that neither nucleotides nor deleting the GLD of AGAP1 affected catalysis, which led us to hypothesize that the GLD is a protein binding site that regulates GAP activity. Two-hybrid screens identified RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 as potential binding partners. Coimmunoprecipitation confirmed that AGAP1 and AGAP2 can bind to RhoA. Binding was mediated by the C terminus of RhoA and was independent of nucleotide. RhoA and the C-terminal peptide from RhoA increased GAP activity specifically for the substrate Arf1. In contrast, a C-terminal peptide from Cdc42 neither bound nor activated AGAP1. Based on these results, we propose that AGAPs are allosterically regulated through protein binding to the GLD domain.     

A phosphoinositide-binding sequence is shared by PH domain target molecules—a model for the binding of PH domains to proteins

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains have been proven to bind phosphoinositides (PI) and inositolphosphates (IP). On the other hand, a binding of PH domains to proteins is still a matter of debate. The goal of this work was to identify potential PH domain protein target sites and to build a model for PH domain–protein binding. A candidate sequence, called HIKE, was identified by sequence homology analysis of the proteins that are considered the strongest PH binding candidates, i.e., G_β, PKC, and Akt. HIKE contains a PI binding sequence and fulfills several criteria for a potential PH-binding site, i.e., it is present in other PH-binding candidates, lies in regulatory regions independently predicted to bind PH domains, and is conserved in 3-D structure among different molecules. These findings and the similarities with the mode of binding of PTB and PDZ domains suggest a β strand–β strand coordination model for PH–protein binding. The HIKE model predicts that membrane anchoring of PH domains and their targets could be a critical step in their interaction, which would consistently explain why PH–protein binding has only been detected in the presence of PI. Proteins 31:1–9, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.