The urbilaterian brain: developmental insights into the evolutionary origin of the brain in insects and vertebrates

Classical phylogenetic, neuroanatomical and neuroembryological studies propose an independent evolutionary origin of the brains of insects and vertebrates. Contrasting with this, data from three sets of molecular and genetic analyses indicate that the developmental program of brains of insects and vertebrates might be highly conserved and suggest a monophyletic origin of the brain of protostomes and deuterostomes. First, recent results of molecular phylogeny imply that none of the currently living animals correspond to evolutionary intermediates between protostomes and deuterostomes, thus making it impossible to infer the morphological organization of an ancestral bilaterian brain from living specimens. Second, recent molecular genetic evidence provides support for the body axis inversion hypothesis, which implies that a dorsoventral inversion of the body axis occurred in protostomes versus deuterostomes, leading to the inverted location of neurogenic regions in these animal groups. Third, recent developmental genetic analyses are uncovering the existence of structurally and functionally homologous genes that have comparable and interchangeable functions in early brain development in insect and vertebrate model systems. Thus, development of the anteriormost part of the embryonic brain in both insects and vertebrates depends upon the otd/Otx and ems/Emx genes; development of the posterior part of the embryonic brain in both insects and vertebrates involves homologous control genes of the Hox cluster. These findings, which demonstrate the conserved expression and function of key patterning genes involved in embryonic brain development in insects and vertebrates support the hypothesis that the brains of protostomes and deuterostomes are of monophyletic, urbilaterian origin.     

Body-plan evolution in the Bilateria: early antero-posterior patterning and the deuterostome-protostome dichotomy

Recent molecular analyses reveal common themes in early antero-posterior patterning in the four major groups of invertebrate deuterostomes and vertebrates in spite of large differences in the mode of gastrulation. Comparisons with Drosophila and Cnidarians suggest a scheme for evolution of the Bilaterian body plan and emphasize the pressing need for similar studies in a wider variety of organisms, especially more basal protostomes.     

Developmental genetics of the Drosophila gut: specification of primordia, subdivision and overt-differentiation.

The Drosophila gut is composed of three major parts, the foregut, midgut and hindgut, which arise from anterior and posterior invaginations of the early blastoderm. We review the process of the specification of the gut primordia, subsequent subdivision and region-specific cell differentiation in terms of developmental genetics. Graded activities of maternal signals at anterior and posterior terminal domains of the blastoderm, being mediated by activities of two zygotic gap genes, tailless and huckebein, lead to the activation of key genes that determine the gut primordia: serpent (GATA factor gene) for the endodermal midgut; brachyenteron (Brachyury homolog) for the ectodermal hindgut. fork head (HNF-3 homolog) and caudal (Cdx homolog) are also essential for the development of all gut primordia or hindgut primordium, respectively. Subdivision of the midgut epithelium is regulated by inductive signals emanating from the visceral mesoderm, which is under the control of HOM-C genes. In contrast, pattern formation of the ectodermal foregut and hindgut is regulated by secreted signaling molecules, such as Wingless (Wnt homolog), Hedgehog and Decapentaplegic (Bmp-4 homolog), as in the case of segmented structures and imaginal discs. Finally, the gut is subdivided into at least 36 compartments that are recognized asminimum tissue units of regional differentiation. A few genes that are responsible for determining and maintaining the state of overt-differentiation of the compartments have also been reported. A marked feature of the genetic mechanism of the gut development is the unexpectedly wide spectrum of the similarities of relevant genes and regulatory pathways of gene expression between Drosophila and vertebrates, which may imply a prototypic style of body plan common to protostomes and deuterostomes.     

The homeobox gene Otx of the jellyfish Podocoryne carnea: role of a head gene in striated muscle and evolution

In many bilaterian animals members of the Otx gene family are expressed in head or brain structures. Cnidarians, however, have no clearly homologous head and no distinct brain; but an Otx homolog from the jellyfish Podocoryne carnea is highly conserved in sequence and domain structure. Sequence similarities extend well beyond the homeodomain and Podocoryne Otx can be aligned over its entire length to human OTX1, OTX2, and CRX. The overall structure of Otx is better conserved from Podocoryne to deuterostomes while protostomes appear to be more derived. In contrast, functions seem to be conserved from protostomes to vertebrates but not in Podocoryne or echinoderms. Podocoryne Otx is expressed only during medusa bud formation and becomes restricted to the striated muscle of medusae. Cnidaria are the most basal animals with striated muscle. Podocoryne polyps have no striated muscle and no Otx expression; both appear only during the asexual medusa budding process. The common ancestor of all animals that gave rise to cnidarians, protostomes, and deuterostomes already had an Otx gene more similar to today's Podocoryne and human homologs than to Drosophila otd, while the head-specific function appears to have evolved only later.     

Formation of the head-trunk boundary in the animal body plan: an evolutionary perspective

Gene expression analyses and anatomical studies suggest that the body plans of protostomes and deuterostomes are phylogenetically related. In the central nervous system (CNS), arthropods and vertebrates (as well as their closest related phyla the urochordates and cephalochordates) share a nerve cord with rostral specification: the cerebral neuromeres in Drosophila, cerebral sensory vesicle of ascidians and lancelets and the large brain of craniates. Homologous genes, in particular of the otd/Otx and Hox families, are at play in these species to specify the anterior and posterior CNS territories, respectively. In contrast, homologies in the establishment of boundary regions like those separating head and trunk structures in arthropods or mid- and hindbrain domains in chordates are still unclear. We compare in these species the formation, properties and molecular characteristics of these boundaries during embryonic development. We also discuss recent findings suggesting that insects and vertebrates might have co-opted factors of related families to control the formation of these boundary regions, the evolution of which would then appear dramatically different from that of the anterior and posterior CNS domains.     

A tolloid homologue from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas

The genes governing mesoderm specification have been extensively studied in vertebrates, arthropods and nematodes. The latter two phyla belong to the Ecdysozoan clade but little is understood of the role that these genes might play in the development of the other major protostomal clade, the Lophotrochozoa. As part of a wider project to analyze the functions associated with transforming growth factor beta superfamily members in Lophotrochozoa, we have cloned a gene encoding a tolloid homologue from the bivalve mollusc Crassostrea gigas. Tolloid is a key developmental protein that regulates the activity of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). We have determined the intron-exon structure of the gene encoding C. gigas tolloid and have compared it with those of homologous genes from both protostomes and deuterostomes. In order to analyze the functionality of oyster tolloid the zebrafish embryo has been employed as a reporter organism and we show that over-expression of this protein results in the ventralization of zebrafish embryos at 24h post fertilization. The expression of the C. gigas tolloid gene during embryonic and larval development as well as in adult tissues is also explored.     

Cloning and developmental expression of Sna, a murine homologue of the Drosophila snail gene.

The genetic analysis of dorsoventral patterning in Drosophila has identified a zinc-finger gene, snail, that is required for mesoderm formation. The cloning and nuclease protection analysis of a Xenopus homologue of this gene has suggested a possible role in the mesoderm of vertebrates. Here, we describe the cloning of a murine homologue of snail, Sna, and in situ hybridisation studies of its developmental expression. Sequence analysis reveals substantial conservation of the second to fifth zinc fingers, but not of the first zinc finger in the Sna gene. Expression occurs in the ectoplacental cone, parietal endoderm, embryonic and extraembryonic mesoderm, in neural crest and in condensing precartilage. Based on the timing and spatial restriction of expression in embryonic mesoderm, we suggest that Sna might be required for the early development of this tissue, as is the case for its Drosophila counterpart. In addition, we propose that Sna might have an analogous role in the development of neural crest. The expression in condensing precartilage indicates that this gene also has a later function in chondrogenesis.     

An urbilaterian origin of the tripartite brain: developmental genetic insights from Drosophila

Studies on expression and function of key developmental control genes suggest that the embryonic vertebrate brain has a tripartite ground plan that consists of a forebrain/midbrain, a hindbrain and an intervening midbrain/hindbrain boundary region, which are characterized by the specific expression of the Otx, Hox and Pax2/5/8 genes, respectively. We show that the embryonic brain of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster expresses all three sets of homologous genes in a similar tripartite pattern. Thus, a Pax2/5/8 expression domain is located at the interface of brain-specific otd/Otx2 and unpg/Gbx2 expression domains anterior to Hox expression regions. We identify this territory as the deutocerebral/tritocerebral boundary region in the embryonic Drosophila brain. Mutational inactivation of otd/Otx2 and unpg/Gbx2 result in the loss or misplacement of the brain-specific expression domains of Pax2/5/8 and Hox genes. In addition, otd/Otx2 and unpg/Gbx2 appear to negatively regulate each other at the interface of their brain-specific expression domains. Our studies demonstrate that the deutocerebral/tritocerebral boundary region in the embryonic Drosophila brain displays developmental genetic features similar to those observed for the midbrain/hindbrain boundary region in vertebrate brain development. This suggests that a tripartite organization of the embryonic brain was already established in the last common urbilaterian ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes.     

Some problems of the origin of the vertebrata

A.O. Kowalevsky was the first to examine in 1865–1867 the groups related to ancestors of vertebrates. They were represented by lancelet (Branchiostoma) and tunicates (Ascidia). As Grobben (1908) divided metazoans which are more advanced than coelenterates into protostomes and deuterostomes, searching for remote relatives of vertebrates was performed among deuterostomes. For a long time, enteropneusts were considered to be probable ancestors of vertebrates and chordates as a whole. Subsequently, this concept was replaced by the hypothesis that chordates evolved from aberrant deuterostomes with a calcitic skeleton, which were named Stylophora or Calcichordata (Jeffries, 1986). Based on the data on the homeobox genes, Malakhov (2006) proposed that chordates could have acquired characters of deuterostomes independently of echinoderms. A separate position is occupied by the theory of Sepp (1959), who proposed that vertebrates appeared as a result of “duplication” of marine annelids. The most primitive living vertebrates, Cyclostomata, have a hypophysis which is enclosed in an unusually long canal under the brain and opens in an aperture just anterior to the brain. Cyclostomata, along with Paleozoic armored fishlike forms, compose the most primitive vertebrate group, Agnatha.     

Wnt8 is required for growth-zone establishment and development of opisthosomal segments in a spider

The Wnt genes encode secreted glycoprotein ligands that regulate many developmental processes from axis formation to tissue regeneration [1]. In bilaterians, there are at least 12 subfamilies of Wnt genes [2]. Wnt3 and Wnt8 are required for somitogenesis in vertebrates [3-7] and are thought to be involved in posterior specification in deuterostomes in general [8]. Although TCF and beta-catenin have been implicated in the posterior patterning of some short-germ insects [9, 10], the specific Wnt ligands required for posterior specification in insects and other protostomes remained unknown. Here we investigated the function of Wnt8 in a chelicerate, the common house spider Achaearanea tepidariorum[11]. Knockdown of Wnt8 in Achaearanea via parental RNAi caused misregulation of Delta, hairy, twist, and caudal and resulted in failure to properly establish a posterior growth zone and truncation of the opisthosoma (abdomen). In embryos with the most severe phenotypes, the entire opisthosoma was missing. Our results suggest that in the spider, Wnt8 is required for posterior development through the specification and maintenance of growth-zone cells. Furthermore, we propose that Wnt8, caudal, and Delta/Notch may be parts of an ancient genetic regulatory network that could have been required for posterior specification in the last common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes.     

Cross-phylum regulatory potential of the ascidian Otx gene in brain development in Drosophila melanogaster

The origin of molecular mechanisms of cephalic development is an intriguing question in evolutionary and developmental biology. Ascidians, positioned near the origin of the phylum Chordata, share a conserved set of anteroposterior patterning genes with vertebrates. Here we report the cross-phylum regulatory potential of the ascidian Otx gene in the development of the Drosophila brain and the head vertex structures. The ascidian Otx gene rescued the embryonic brain defect caused by a null mutation of the Drosophila orthodenticle (otd) gene and enhanced rostral brain development while it suppressed trunk nerve cord formation. Furthermore, the ascidian Otx gene restored the head vertex defects caused by a viable otd mutation, ocelliless, via specific activation and repression of downstream regulatory genes. These cross-phylum regulatory potentials of the ascidian Otx gene are equivalent to the activities of the Drosophila and human otd/Otx genes in these developmental processes. These results support the notion that basal chordates such as ascidians have the same molecular patterning mechanism for the anterior structures found in higher chordates, and suggest a common genetic program of cephalic development in invertebrate, protochordate and vertebrate.     

Heteromerization of innexin gap junction proteins regulates epithelial tissue organization in Drosophila

Gap junctions consist of clusters of intercellular channels, which enable direct cell-to-cell communication and adhesion in animals. Whereas deuterostomes, including all vertebrates, use members of the connexin and pannexin multiprotein families to assemble gap junction channels, protostomes such as Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans use members of the innexin protein family. The molecular composition of innexin-containing gap junctions and the functional significance of innexin oligomerization for development are largely unknown. Here, we report that heteromerization of Drosophila innexins 2 and 3 is crucial for epithelial organization and polarity of the embryonic epidermis. Both innexins colocalize in epithelial cell membranes. Innexin3 is mislocalized to the cytoplasm in innexin2 mutants and is recruited into ectopic expression domains defined by innexin2 misexpression. Conversely, RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of innexin3 causes mislocalization of innexin2 and of DE-cadherin, causing cell polarity defects in the epidermis. Biochemical interaction studies, surface plasmon resonance analysis, transgenesis, and biochemical fractionation experiments demonstrate that both innexins interact via their C-terminal cytoplasmic domains during the assembly of heteromeric channels. Our data provide the first molecular and functional demonstration that innexin heteromerization occurs in vivo and reveal insight into a molecular mechanism by which innexins may oligomerize into heteromeric gap junction channels.     

Developmental genetic evidence for a monophyletic origin of the bilaterian brain

The widely held notion of an independent evolutionary origin of invertebrate and vertebrate brains is based on classical phylogenetic, neuroanatomical and embryological data. The interpretation of these data in favour of a polyphyletic origin of animals brains is currently being challenged by three fundamental findings that derive from comparative molecular, genetic and developmental analyses. First, modern molecular systematics indicates that none of the extant animals correspond to evolutionary intermediates between the protostomes and the deuterostomes, thus making it impossible to deduce the morphological organization of the ancestral bilaterian or its brain from living species. Second, recent molecular genetic evidence for the body axis inversion hypothesis now supports the idea that the basic body plan of vertebrates and invertebrates is similar but inverted, suggesting that the ventral nerve chord of protostome invertebrates is homologous to the dorsal nerve cord of deuterostome chordates. Third, a developmental genetic analysis of the molecular control elements involved in early embryonic brain patterning is uncovering the existence of structurally and functionally homologous genes that have comparable and interchangeable functions in key aspects of brain development in invertebrate and vertebrate model systems. All three of these findings are compatible with the hypothesis of a monophyletic origin of the bilaterian brain. Here we review these findings and consider their significance and implications for current thinking on the evolutionary origin of bilaterian brains. We also preview the impact of comparative functional genomic analyses on our understanding of brain evolution.     

Developmental Gene Expression in Amphioxus: New Insights into the Evolutionary Origin of Vertebrate Brain Regions, Neural Crest, and Rostrocaudal Segmentation

SYNOPSIS. Amphioxus is widely held to be the closest invertebraterelative of the vertebrates and the best available stand-infor the proximate ancestor of the vertebrates. The spatiotemporalexpression patterns of developmental genes can help suggestbody part homologies between vertebrates and amphioxus. Thisapproach is illustrated using five homeobox genes (AmphiHoxl,AmphiHox2, AmphiOtx, AmphiDll, and AmphiEri) to provide insightsinto the evolutionary origins of three important vertebratefeatures: the major brain regions, the neural crest, and rostrocaudalsegmentation. During amphioxus development, the neural expressionpatterns of these genes are consistent with the presence ofa forebrain (detailed neuroanatomy indicates that the forebrainis all diencephalon without any telencephalon) and an extensivehindbrain; the possible presence of a midbrain requires additionalstudy. Further, during neurulation, the expression pattern ofAmphiDll as well as migratory cell behavior suggest that theepidermal cells bordering the neural plate may represent a phylogeneticprecursor of the vertebrate neural crest. Finally, when theparaxial mesoderm begins to segment, the earliest expressionof AmphiEn is detected in the posterior part of each nascentand newly formed somite. This pattern recalls the expressionof the segment-polarity gene engrailed during establishmentof the segments of metameric protostomes. Thus, during animalevolution, the role of engrailed in establishing and maintainingmetameric body plans may have arisen in a common segmented ancestorof both the protostomes and deuterostomes.     

Dorsoventral axis inversion: A phylogenetic perspective

Recent molecular evidence suggests that the body plans of insects and vertebrates may be dorsoventrally inverted with respect to one another. This poses a major challenge for comparative zoologists, either to explain how this came about or to offer alternative interpretations of the data. Dorsoventral inversion is most easily explained if the mouth of deuterostome metazoans (which would include vertebrates) is truly a secondary structure unrelated to the protostome mouth, located opposite to the latter on the dorsal surface of the body. Two possibilities are (1) that the definitive deuterostome mouth has replaced a preexisting protostome-type mouth, or (2) that ancestral deuterostomes lacked a protostome-type mouth altogether, and formed a secondary dorsal mouth entirely de novo. Our current understanding of invertebrate embryogenesis and larval morphology provides at least as much support, if not more, for (2) as for (1). By implication, even if ancestral protostomes and deuterostomes shared common anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning systems, they may still have differed significantly with respect to other aspects of body organization and been otherwise very dissimilar organisms.     

Strategies to establish left/right asymmetry in vertebrates and invertebrates

Left/right (L/R) asymmetry is essential during embryonic development for organ positioning, looping and handed morphogenesis. A major goal in the field is to understand how embryos initially determine their left and right hand sides, a process known as symmetry breaking. A number of recent studies on several vertebrate and invertebrate model organisms have provided a more complex view on how L/R asymmetry is established, revealing an apparent partition between deuterostomes and protostomes. In deuterostomes, nodal cilia represent a conserved symmetry-breaking process; nevertheless, growing evidence shows the existence of pre-cilia L/R asymmetries involving active ion flows. In protostomes like snails and Drosophila, symmetry breaking relies on different mechanisms, involving, in particular, the actin cytoskeleton and associated molecular motors.     

Evolution of deuterostomy – and origin of the chordates

The chordates are usually characterized as bilaterians showing deuterostomy, i.e. the mouth developing as a new opening between the archenteron and the ectoderm, serial gill pores/slits, and the complex of chorda and neural tube. Both numerous molecular studies and studies of morphology and embryology demonstrate that the neural tube must be considered homologous to the ventral nerve cord(s) of the protostomes, but the origin of the ‘new’ mouth of the deuterostomes has remained enigmatic. However, deuterostomy is known to occur in several protostomian groups, such as the chaetognaths and representatives of annelids, molluscs, arthropods and priapulans. This raises the question whether the deuterostomian mouth is in fact homologous with that of the protostomes, viz. the anterior opening of the ancestral blastopore divided through lateral blastopore fusion, i.e. amphistomy. A few studies of gene expression show identical expression patterns around mouth and anus in protostomes and deuterostomes. Closer studies of the embryology of ascidians and vertebrates show that the mouth/stomodaeum differentiates from the anterior edge of the neural plate. Together this indicates that the chordate mouth has moved to the anterior edge of the blastopore, so that the anterior loop of the ancestral circumblastoporal nerve cord, which is narrow in the protostomes, has become indistinguishable. In the vertebrates, the mouth has moved further around the anterior pole to the ‘ventral’ side. The conclusion must be that the chordate mouth (and that of the deuterostomes in general) is homologous to the protostomian mouth and that the latest common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes developed through amphistomy, as suggested by the trochaea theory.     

Cnidarians and ancestral genetic complexity in the animal kingdom

Eleven of the twelve recognized wingless (Wnt) subfamilies are represented in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, indicating that this developmentally important gene family was already fully diversified in the common ancestor of 'higher' animals. In deuterostomes, although duplications have occurred, no novel subfamilies of Wnts have evolved. By contrast, the protostomes Drosophila and Caenorhabditis have lost half of the ancestral Wnts. This pattern -- loss of genes from an ancestrally complex state -- might be more important in animal evolution than previously recognized.