The Role and Dynamic of Strengthening in the Reconsolidation Process in a Human Declarative Memory: What Decides the Fate of Recent and Older Memories?

Several reports have shown that after specific reminders are presented, consolidated memories pass from a stable state to one in which the memory is reactivated. This reactivation implies that memories are labile and susceptible to amnesic agents. This susceptibility decreases over time and leads to a re-stabilization phase usually known as reconsolidation. With respect to the biological role of reconsolidation, two functions have been proposed. First, the reconsolidation process allows new information to be integrated into the background of the original memory; second, it strengthens the original memory. We have previously demonstrated that both of these functions occur in the reconsolidation of human declarative memories. Our paradigm consisted of learning verbal material (lists of five pairs of nonsense syllables) acquired by a training process (L1-training) on Day 1 of our experiment. After this declarative memory is consolidated, it can be made labile by presenting a specific reminder. After this, the memory passes through a subsequent stabilization process. Strengthening creates a new scenario for the reconsolidation process; this function represents a new factor that may transform the dynamic of memories. First, we analyzed whether the repeated labilization-reconsolidation processes maintained the memory for longer periods of time. We showed that at least one labilization-reconsolidation process strengthens a memory via evaluation 5 days after its re-stabilization. We also demonstrated that this effect is not triggered by retrieval only. We then analyzed the way strengthening modified the effect of an amnesic agent that was presented immediately after repeated labilizations. The repeated labilization-reconsolidation processes made the memory more resistant to interference during re-stabilization. Finally, we evaluated whether the effect of strengthening may depend on the age of the memory. We found that the effect of strengthening did depend on the age of the memory. Forgetting may represent a process that weakens the effect of strengthening.     

Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process

Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated.     

A mismatch-based model for memory reconsolidation and extinction in attractor networks

The processes of memory reconsolidation and extinction have received increasing attention in recent experimental research, as their potential clinical applications begin to be uncovered. A number of studies suggest that amnestic drugs injected after reexposure to a learning context can disrupt either of the two processes, depending on the behavioral protocol employed. Hypothesizing that reconsolidation represents updating of a memory trace in the hippocampus, while extinction represents formation of a new trace, we have built a neural network model in which either simple retrieval, reconsolidation or extinction of a stored attractor can occur upon contextual reexposure, depending on the similarity between the representations of the original learning and reexposure sessions. This is achieved by assuming that independent mechanisms mediate Hebbian-like synaptic strengthening and mismatch-driven labilization of synaptic changes, with protein synthesis inhibition preferentially affecting the former. Our framework provides a unified mechanistic explanation for experimental data showing (a) the effect of reexposure duration on the occurrence of reconsolidation or extinction and (b) the requirement of memory updating during reexposure to drive reconsolidation.     

The secret life of memories

Recent evidence has challenged the view that memories are made permanent by a consolidation process that happens just once and instead have suggested that memories are "re-consolidated" after reminders. The current findings of Morris et al. in this issue of Neuron suggest that reconsolidation may involve a complex interaction between synaptic and system processing of recent as well as remote experiences.     

The role of protein synthesis in memory reconsolidation in different time periods after fear conditioning in mice

We have studied the role of protein synthesis in reconsolidation of memory, activated by reminder at different time period after initial acquisition. Mice were trained in a single-trial fear conditioning task and then subjected to reminder, preceded by injection of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. It was found that this procedure impaired later memory retrieval if applied at 3, 6 and 24 h as well as 14 and 30 days after initial training. This data suggests that reactivated memory is followed by protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation both at short (3-6 h) and long (14-30 days) intervals after initial acquisition.     

Glycogen synthase kinase 3β in the basolateral amygdala is critical for the reconsolidation of cocaine reward memory

Exposure to cocaine-associated conditioned stimuli elicits craving and increases the probability of cocaine relapse in cocaine users even after extended periods of abstinence. Recent evidence indicates that cocaine seeking can be inhibited by disrupting the reconsolidation of the cocaine cue memories and that basolateral amygdala (BLA) neuronal activity plays a role in this effect. Previous studies demonstrated that glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) plays a role in the reconsolidation of fear memory. Here, we used a conditioned place preference procedure to examine the role of GSK-3β in the BLA in the reconsolidation of cocaine cue memories. GSK-3β activity in the BLA, but not central amygdala (CeA), in rats that acquired cocaine (10 mg/kg)-induced conditioned place preference increased after re-exposure to a previously cocaine-paired chamber (i.e., a memory reactivation procedure). Systemic injections of the GSK-3β inhibitor lithium chloride after memory reactivation impaired the reconsolidation of cocaine cue memories and inhibited subsequent cue-induced GSK-3β activity in the BLA. Basolateral amygdala, but not central amygdala, injections of SB216763, a selective inhibitor of GSK-3β, immediately after the reactivation of cocaine cue memories also disrupted cocaine cue memory reconsolidation and prevented cue-induced increases in GSK-3β activity in the BLA. The effect of SB216763 on the reconsolidation of cocaine cue memories lasted at least 2 weeks and was not recovered by a cocaine priming injection. These results indicate that GSK-3β activity in the BLA mediates the reconsolidation of cocaine cue memories.     

Consolidation and reconsolidation: two lives of memories?

Most studies on memory consolidation consider the new information as if it were imposed on a tabula rasa, but considerable evidence indicates that new memories must be interleaved within a large network of relevant pre-existing knowledge. Early studies on reconsolidation highlighted that a newly consolidated memory could be erased after reactivation, but new evidence has shown that an effective reactivation experience must also involve memory reorganization to incorporate new learning. The combination of these observations on consolidation and reconsolidation highlights the fundamental similarities of both phenomena as the integration of new information and old, and it suggests reconsolidation = consolidation as a neverending process of schema modification.     

非侵入性脑刺激应用于创伤后应激障碍和物质滥用障碍的记忆干预

记忆是进行思维、想象等高级心理活动的基础，是累积经验、促进个体生存的重要功能。然而，创伤后应激障碍和物质滥用障碍具有某种非适应性记忆过强的特征，不利于个体生存。因此，以病理性改变的记忆为靶点，通过削弱或更新非适应性记忆，可以达到缓解症状甚至治愈的目的。记忆并非是对经验的刻板记录，而是对经验不断更新整合的过程，因此记忆有被干预的可能。记忆的再次激活可能会诱发记忆消退和再巩固，这为记忆相关精神疾病的干预提供了思路和启发。非侵入性脑刺激（noninvasive brain stimulation,NIBS）技术作为一种时间、空间分辨率较高的无创神经调控技术，近年来开始被结合运用到记忆干预研究中。不同刺激参数的NIBS （如频率、极性，以及受刺激区域的初始神经激活状态）应用于特定大脑皮质区域，可以调节神经可塑性，增强或降低靶点脑区的兴奋性，从而削弱或增强行为表现，实现记忆消退增强或在再巩固时间窗内干预记忆。本文首先介绍了记忆相关的脑功能基础研究与局部脑区干预方案的理论联系，继而回顾了近年来NIBS与记忆干预相结合应用于创伤或物质滥用相关障碍的临床干预研究，为精神疾病临床诊疗提供理论依据和启发。     

Linking new information to a reactivated memory requires consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms

A new memory is initially labile and becomes stabilized through a process of consolidation, which depends on gene expression. Stable memories, however, can again become labile if reactivated by recall and require another phase of protein synthesis in order to be maintained. This process is known as reconsolidation. The functional significance of the labile phase of reconsolidation is unknown; one hypothesis proposes that it is required to link new information with reactivated memories. Reconsolidation is distinct from the initial consolidation, and one distinction is that the requirement for specific proteins or general protein synthesis during the two processes occurs in different brain areas. Here, we identified an anatomically distinctive molecular requirement that doubly dissociates consolidation from reconsolidation of an inhibitory avoidance memory. We then used this requirement to investigate whether reconsolidation and consolidation are involved in linking new information with reactivated memories. In contrast to what the hypothesis predicted, we found that reconsolidation does not contribute to the formation of an association between new and reactivated information. Instead, it recruits mechanisms similar to those underlying consolidation of a new memory. Thus, linking new information to a reactivated memory is mediated by consolidation and not reconsolidation mechanisms.     

The role of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in memory consolidation and reconsolidation in the passive avoidance task in 1-day-old chicks

Although reconsolidation of memory after reminder does not seem to be the simple reiteration of the sequential stages occurring during memory consolidation, both phenomena probably employ similar mechanisms including activation of glutamate receptors and protein synthesis. It is known that group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in memory consolidation and modulation of protein synthesis. The aim of present study was to investigate the role of mGluR5 in memory consolidation and reconsolidation and to determine whether inhibition of these receptors may affect protein synthesis in these processes. The one-trial passive avoidance task on chicks was used as the experimental model of learning. Injection of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP into a specific chick brain region IMM resulted in amnesia, provided the injection was made either shortly before or after training, or approximately 4 h after training. This amnesia was permanent, resembling the effects of protein synthesis inhibitors. MPEP injection immediately after reminder resulted in only a transient amnesia revealed 1h later. Increased expression of Zif/268 and c-Fos proteins 2 h after initial training was abolished bilaterally in chicks injected with MPEP. Injection of MPEP immediately after reminder did not inhibit c-Fos and Zif/268 expression, on the contrary, their expression was increased, specifically in left IMM and was similar to that observed after initial training. These results show that at least in the chick model mGluR5 play an important role in both consolidation and reconsolidation of memory but the mechanisms triggered by their activation in these processes differ. It is suggested that Ca(2+) signal derived from mGluR5 stimulation is necessary for complete memory consolidation, whereas during reconsolidation other mGluR5 triggered mechanisms of protein synthesis activation and regulation may be involved.     

Modeling Reconsolidation in Kernel Associative Memory

Memory reconsolidation is a central process enabling adaptive memory and the perception of a constantly changing reality. It causes memories to be strengthened, weakened or changed following their recall. A computational model of memory reconsolidation is presented. Unlike Hopfield-type memory models, our model introduces an unbounded number of attractors that are updatable and can process real-valued, large, realistic stimuli. Our model replicates three characteristic effects of the reconsolidation process on human memory: increased association, extinction of fear memories, and the ability to track and follow gradually changing objects. In addition to this behavioral validation, a continuous time version of the reconsolidation model is introduced. This version extends average rate dynamic models of brain circuits exhibiting persistent activity to include adaptivity and an unbounded number of attractors.     

The mechanisms of memory reorganization during the retrieval of acquired behavioral experience in chicks: the effects of protein synthesis blockade in the brain]

It is currently assumed that disruption of memory formation by inhibitors of protein synthesis can occur in a relatively short time interval before and after training. However, there is some evidence that memory may be disrupted by delayed injections of protein synthesis inhibitors during "reminder" treatment, i.e., environmental cue that was presented earlier during the training procedure. Our experiments were conducted to test the late effects of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide on memory in chicks using a reminder treatment. A standard passive avoidance task was presented to day-old chicks. A reminder (a dry bead of the same color as during training) was delivered within 2, 24, or 48 hours after the training. Chicks were bilaterally intracranially injected with cycloheximide (20 micrograms) into the IMHV area 5 min prior to reminder administration. Testing was conducted 0.5, 1, 3, 24, and 48 hours after the reminder. Administration of cycloheximide before the reminder resulted in transient amnesia. Duration of amnesia decreased with increasing interval between the training and reminder procedures. These results suggest that memory reactivated by the reminder treatment is subjected to reorganization and reconsolidation depending on protein synthesis. The gradual decrease in vulnerability of memory to protein synthesis inhibitor points to development of memory consolidation process in the interval between 2 and 48 h after training.     

New insights in human memory interference and consolidation

Learning new facts and skills in succession can be frustrating because no sooner has new knowledge been acquired than its retention is being jeopardized by learning another set of skills or facts. Interference between memories has recently provided important new insights into the neural and psychological systems responsible for memory processing. For example, interference not only occurs between the same types of memories, but can also occur between different types of memories, which has important implications for our understanding of memory organization. Converging evidence has begun to reveal that the brain produces interference independently from other aspects of memory processing, which suggests that interference may have an important but previously overlooked function. A memory's initial susceptibility to interference and subsequent resistance to interference after its acquisition has revealed that memories continue to be processed 'off-line' during consolidation. Recent work has demonstrated that off-line processing is not limited to just the stabilization of a memory, which was once the defining characteristic of consolidation; instead, off-line processing can have a rich diversity of effects, from enhancing performance to making hidden rules explicit. Off-line processing also occurs after memory retrieval when memories are destabilized and then subsequently restabalized during reconsolidation. Studies are beginning to reveal the function of reconsolidation, its mechanistic relationship to consolidation and its potential as a therapeutic target for the modification of memories.     

GSK-3beta is required for memory reconsolidation in adult brain

Activation of GSK-3beta is presumed to be involved in various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is characterized by memory disturbances during early stages of the disease. The normal function of GSK-3beta in adult brain is not well understood. Here, we analyzed the ability of heterozygote GSK-3beta knockout (GSK+/-) mice to form memories. In the Morris water maze (MWM), learning and memory performance of GSK+/- mice was no different from that of wild-type (WT) mice for the first 3 days of training. With continued learning on subsequent days, however, retrograde amnesia was induced in GSK+/- mice, suggesting that GSK+/- mice might be impaired in their ability to form long-term memories. In contextual fear conditioning (CFC), context memory was normally consolidated in GSK+/- mice, but once the original memory was reactivated, they showed reduced freezing, suggesting that GSK+/- mice had impaired memory reconsolidation. Biochemical analysis showed that GSK-3beta was activated after memory reactivation in WT mice. Intraperitoneal injection of a GSK-3 inhibitor before memory reactivation impaired memory reconsolidation in WT mice. These results suggest that memory reconsolidation requires activation of GSK-3beta in the adult brain.     

New Episodic Learning Interferes with the Reconsolidation of Autobiographical Memories

It is commonly assumed that, with time, an initially labile memory is transformed into a permanent one via a process of consolidation. Yet, recent evidence indicates that memories can return to a fragile state again when reactivated, requiring a period of reconsolidation. In the study described here, we found that participants who memorized a story immediately after they had recalled neutral and emotional experiences from their past were impaired in their memory for the neutral (but not for the emotional) experiences one week later. The effect of learning the story depended critically on the preceding reactivation of the autobiographical memories since learning without reactivation had no effect. These results suggest that new learning impedes the reconsolidation of neutral autobiographical memories.     

Systems-level reconsolidation: reengagement of the hippocampus with memory reactivation

Certain types of memories are dependent on the hippocampus for a short period of time following training, after which they are no longer susceptible to hippocampal manipulations. Having completed this initial consolidation process, a memory may once again engage the hippocampus (undergo reconsolidation) when recalled. Two studies in the current issue of Neuron make important advances in our understanding of reconsolidation but reach different conclusions about the modifiability of old memories.     

Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation

Memory reconsolidation has been argued to be a distinct process that serves to maintain, strengthen or modify memories. Specifically, the retrieval of a previously consolidated memory has been hypothesized to induce an additional activity-dependent labile period during which the memory can be modified. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of reconsolidation could provide crucial insights into the dynamic aspects of normal mnemonic function and psychiatric disorders that are characterized by exceptionally strong and salient emotional memories.