Simplification of the genetic code: restricted diversity of genetically encoded amino acids

At earlier stages in the evolution of the universal genetic code, fewer than 20 amino acids were considered to be used. Although this notion is supported by a wide range of data, the actual existence and function of the genetic codes with a limited set of canonical amino acids have not been addressed experimentally, in contrast to the successful development of the expanded codes. Here, we constructed artificial genetic codes involving a reduced alphabet. In one of the codes, a tRNA^Ala variant with the Trp anticodon reassigns alanine to an unassigned UGG codon in the Escherichia coli S30 cell-free translation system lacking tryptophan. We confirmed that the efficiency and accuracy of protein synthesis by this Trp-lacking code were comparable to those by the universal genetic code, by an amino acid composition analysis, green fluorescent protein fluorescence measurements and the crystal structure determination. We also showed that another code, in which UGU/UGC codons are assigned to Ser, synthesizes an active enzyme. This method will provide not only new insights into primordial genetic codes, but also an essential protein engineering tool for the assessment of the early stages of protein evolution and for the improvement of pharmaceuticals.     

Evolution of the mitochondrial genetic code I. Origin of AGR serine and stop codons in metazoan mitochondria

Summary AGA and AGG (AGR) are arginine codons in the universal genetic code. These codons are read as serine or are used as stop codons in metazoan mitochondria. The arginine residues coded by AGR in yeast orTrypanosoma are coded by arginine CGN throughout metazoan mitochondria. AGR serine sites in metazoan mitochondria are occupied mainly in corresponding sites in yeast orTrypanosoma mitochondria by UCN serine, AGY serine, or codons for amino acids other than serine or arginine. Based on these observations, we propose the following evolutionary events. AGR codons became unassigned because of deletion of tRNA Arg (UCU) and elimination of AGR codons by conversion to CGN arginine codons. Upon acquisition by serine tRNA of pairing ability with AGR codons, some codons for amino acids other than arginine mutated to AGR, and were caputed by anticodon GCU in serine tRNA. During vertebrate mitochondrial evolution, AGR stop codons presumably were created from UAG stop by deletion of the first nucleotide U and by use of R as the third nucleotide that had existed next to the ancestral UAG stop.     

An integrated,structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code

The principles of mRNA decoding are conserved among all extant life forms. We present an integrative view of all the interaction networks between mRNA, tRNA and rRNA: the intrinsic stability of codon–anticodon duplex, the conformation of the anticodon hairpin, the presence of modified nucleotides, the occurrence of non-Watson–Crick pairs in the codon–anticodon helix and the interactions with bases of rRNA at the A-site decoding site. We derive a more information-rich, alternative representation of the genetic code, that is circular with an unsymmetrical distribution of codons leading to a clear segregation between GC-rich 4-codon boxes and AU-rich 2:2-codon and 3:1-codon boxes. All tRNA sequence variations can be visualized, within an internal structural and energy framework, for each organism, and each anticodon of the sense codons. The multiplicity and complexity of nucleotide modifications at positions 34 and 37 of the anticodon loop segregate meaningfully, and correlate well with the necessity to stabilize AU-rich codon–anticodon pairs and to avoid miscoding in split codon boxes. The evolution and expansion of the genetic code is viewed as being originally based on GC content with progressive introduction of A/U together with tRNA modifications. The representation we present should help the engineering of the genetic code to include non-natural amino acids.     

Evolution of the Genetic Code by Incorporation of Amino Acids that Improved or Changed Protein Function

Fifty years have passed since the genetic code was deciphered, but how the genetic code came into being has not been satisfactorily addressed. It is now widely accepted that the earliest genetic code did not encode all 20 amino acids found in the universal genetic code as some amino acids have complex biosynthetic pathways and likely were not available from the environment. Therefore, the genetic code evolved as pathways for synthesis of new amino acids became available. One hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of the genetic code four amino acids—valine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glycine—were coded by GNC codons (N = any base) with the remaining codons being nonsense codons. The other sixteen amino acids were subsequently added to the genetic code by changing nonsense codons into sense codons for these amino acids. Improvement in protein function is presumed to be the driving force behind the evolution of the code, but how improved function was achieved by adding amino acids has not been examined. Based on an analysis of amino acid function in proteins, an evolutionary mechanism for expansion of the genetic code is described in which individual coded amino acids were replaced by new amino acids that used nonsense codons differing by one base change from the sense codons previously used. The improved or altered protein function afforded by the changes in amino acid function provided the selective advantage underlying the expansion of the genetic code. Analysis of amino acid properties and functions explains why amino acids are found in their respective positions in the genetic code.     

Genetic code development by stop codon takeover

A novel theoretical consideration of the origin and evolution of the genetic code is presented. Code development is viewed from the perspective of simultaneously evolving codons, anticodons and amino acids. Early code structure was determined primarily by thermodynamic stability considerations, requiring simplicity in primordial codes. More advanced coding stages could arise as biological systems became more complex and precise in their replication. To be consistent with these ideas, a model is described in which codons become permanently associated with amino acids only when a codon-anticodon pairing is strong enough to permit rapid translation. Hence all codons are essentially chain-termination or "stop" codons until tRNA adaptors evolve having the ability to bind tightly to them. This view, which draws support from several lines of evidence, differs from the prevalent thinking on code evolution which holds that codons specifying newer amino acids were derived from codons encoding older amino acids.     

Rewiring translation - Genetic code expansion and its applications

With few minor variations, the genetic code is universal to all forms of life on our planet. It is difficult to imagine that one day organisms might exist that use an entirely different code to translate the information of their genome. Recent developments in the field of synthetic biology, however, have opened the gate to their creation. The genetic code of several organisms has been expanded by the heterologous expression of evolved aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA(CUA) pairs that mediate the incorporation of unnatural amino acids in response to amber codons. These UAAs introduce exciting new features into proteins, such as spectroscopic probes, UV-inducible crosslinkers, and functional groups for bioorthogonal conjugations or posttranslational modifications. Orthogonal ribosomes provide a parallel translational machinery in Escherichia coli that has lost its evolutionary constraints. Evolved variants of these ribosomes translate amber or quadruplet codons with massively enhanced efficiency. Here, I review these recent developments emphasizing their tremendous potential to facilitate biochemical and cell biological studies.     

Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase: An ordinary enzyme but an outstanding genetic code expansion tool

The genetic incorporation of the 22nd proteinogenic amino acid, pyrrolysine (Pyl) at amber codon is achieved by the action of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) together with its cognate tRNA^Pyl. Unlike most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, PylRS displays high substrate side chain promiscuity, low selectivity toward its substrate α-amine, and low selectivity toward the anticodon of tRNA^Pyl. These unique but ordinary features of PylRS as an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase allow the Pyl incorporation machinery to be easily engineered for the genetic incorporation of more than 100 non-canonical amino acids (NCAAs) or α-hydroxy acids into proteins at amber codon and the reassignment of other codons such as ochre UAA, opal UGA, and four-base AGGA codons to code NCAAs.     

The origin of the genetic code: amino acids as cofactors in an RNA world.

The genetic code, understood as the specific assignment of amino acids to nucleotide triplets, might have preceded the existence of translation. Amino acids became utilized as cofactors by ribozymes in a metabolically complex RNA world. Specific charging ribozymes linked amino acids to corresponding RNA handles, which could basepair with different ribozymes, via an anticodon hairpin, and so deliver the cofactor to the ribozyme. Growing of the 'handle' into a presumptive tRNA was possible while function was retained and modified throughout. A stereochemical relation between some amino acids and cognate anticodons/codons is likely to have been important in the earliest assignments. Recent experimental findings, including selection for ribozymes catalyzing peptide-bond formation and those utilizing an amino acid cofactor, hold promise that scenarios of this major transition can be tested.     

On the origin of the translation system and the genetic code in the RNA world by means of natural selection, exaptation, and subfunctionalization

Background  

The origin of the translation system is, arguably, the central and the hardest problem in the study of the origin of life, and one of the hardest in all evolutionary biology. The problem has a clear catch-22 aspect: high translation fidelity hardly can be achieved without a complex, highly evolved set of RNAs and proteins but an elaborate protein machinery could not evolve without an accurate translation system. The origin of the genetic code and whether it evolved on the basis of a stereochemical correspondence between amino acids and their cognate codons (or anticodons), through selectional optimization of the code vocabulary, as a "frozen accident" or via a combination of all these routes is another wide open problem despite extensive theoretical and experimental studies. Here we combine the results of comparative genomics of translation system components, data on interaction of amino acids with their cognate codons and anticodons, and data on catalytic activities of ribozymes to develop conceptual models for the origins of the translation system and the genetic code.     

Accurate translation of the genetic code depends on tRNA modified nucleosides

Transfer RNA molecules translate the genetic code by recognizing cognate mRNA codons during protein synthesis. The anticodon wobble at position 34 and the nucleotide immediately 3' to the anticodon triplet at position 37 display a large diversity of modified nucleosides in the tRNAs of all organisms. We show that tRNA species translating 2-fold degenerate codons require a modified U(34) to enable recognition of their cognate codons ending in A or G but restrict reading of noncognate or near-cognate codons ending in U and C that specify a different amino acid. In particular, the nucleoside modifications 2-thiouridine at position 34 (s(2)U(34)), 5-methylaminomethyluridine at position 34 (mnm(5)U(34)), and 6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine at position 37 (t(6)A(37)) were essential for Watson-Crick (AAA) and wobble (AAG) cognate codon recognition by tRNA(UUU)(Lys) at the ribosomal aminoacyl and peptidyl sites but did not enable the recognition of the asparagine codons (AAU and AAC). We conclude that modified nucleosides evolved to modulate an anticodon domain structure necessary for many tRNA species to accurately translate the genetic code.     

Development of the genetic code: Insights from a fungal codon reassignment

The high conservation of the genetic code and its fundamental role in genome decoding suggest that its evolution is highly restricted or even frozen. However, various prokaryotic and eukaryotic genetic code alterations, several alternative tRNA-dependent amino acid biosynthesis pathways, regulation of tRNA decoding by diverse nucleoside modifications and recent in vivo incorporation of non-natural amino acids into prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins, show that the code evolves and is surprisingly flexible. The cellular mechanisms and the proteome buffering capacity that support such evolutionary processes remain unclear. Here we explore the hypothesis that codon misreading and reassignment played fundamental roles in the development of the genetic code and we show how a fungal codon reassignment is enlightening its evolution.     

Primordial reading of genetic information

From the consideration of general features of the anticodon loop and stem in tRNA and the properties of present-day translation, we put forward a plausible scenario to explain the evolution of the genetic code from a highly ambiguous triplet code to the present refined decoding system. Our model based on the reading of the code suggests that the anticodon of primordial tRNA could adopt either the 3' or the 5' stacked conformation permitting the formation of the "best two out of three" base pairs, either the first and second codon position or the second and third. Progressive acquisition of precise structural constraint and the modification of bases in the anticodon loop would give way eventually to the less ambiguous "two out of three" reading mechanism having only the 3' stacked conformation. Further adjustments of base composition and modification leads inevitably to the present generalized code. In this way the primordial code encoding 4-8 amino acids or related derivates evolves smoothly to the present code having 20 amino acids.     

Modification of orthogonal tRNAs: unexpected consequences for sense codon reassignment

Breaking the degeneracy of the genetic code via sense codon reassignment has emerged as a way to incorporate multiple copies of multiple non-canonical amino acids into a protein of interest. Here, we report the modification of a normally orthogonal tRNA by a host enzyme and show that this adventitious modification has a direct impact on the activity of the orthogonal tRNA in translation. We observed nearly equal decoding of both histidine codons, CAU and CAC, by an engineered orthogonal M. jannaschii tRNA with an AUG anticodon: tRNA^Opt. We suspected a modification of the tRNA^Opt_AUG anticodon was responsible for the anomalous lack of codon discrimination and demonstrate that adenosine 34 of tRNA^Opt_AUG is converted to inosine. We identified tRNA^Opt_AUG anticodon loop variants that increase reassignment of the histidine CAU codon, decrease incorporation in response to the histidine CAC codon, and improve cell health and growth profiles. Recognizing tRNA modification as both a potential pitfall and avenue of directed alteration will be important as the field of genetic code engineering continues to infiltrate the genetic codes of diverse organisms.     

Four-base codon/anticodon strategy and non-enzymatic aminoacylation for protein engineering with non-natural amino acids

Techniques for position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids in an in vitro protein synthesizing system are described. First, a PNA-assisted non-enzymatic tRNA aminoacylation with a variety of natural and non-natural amino acids is described. With this technique, one can aminoacylate a specific tRNA simply by adding a preformed amino acid activated ester-PNA conjugate into an in vitro protein biosynthesizing system. Second, the genetic code is expanded by introducing 4-base codons that can be exclusively translated to non-natural amino acids. The most advantageous point of the 4-base codon strategy is to introduce multiple amino acids into specific positions in single proteins by using mutually orthogonal 4-base codons and orthogonal tRNAs. An easy and quick method for preparation of tRNAs possessing 4-base anticodons is also described. Combination of the non-enzymatic aminoacylation and the 4-base codon/anticodon strategy gives an easy and widely applicable technique for incorporating a variety of non-natural amino acids into proteins in vitro.     

The origin of the genetic code.

A new approach to the origin of the genetic code is proposed based on some regularities in the nucleotide distribution pattern of the code. The relative amounts of various amino acids in primitive proteins were possibly different from those in organisms living today. The primordial ratio was supposed to shift to the modern one guided by the action of primitive nucleotides. Each primitive tRNA had a discriminator site and, distinguished from it, an anticodon site. It also postulated that primordially each amino acid could correspond to a wide variety of codons. During the course of the evolutionary change, a selective mechanism worked among the protobionts so that less frequent nucleotides became associated with more abundant amino acids in the primordial conditions,thus finally leading to the present codon catalogue.     

Expanding genetic code: Amino acids 21 and 22, selenocysteine and pyrrolysine

The discovery of two atypical amino acids, selenocysteine and pyrrolysine, in the genetic code is discussed. These findings have expanded our understanding of the genetic code, since the repertoire of amino acids in the genetic code was supplemented by two novel ones, in addition of the standard 20 amino acids. Current views on specific mechanisms of selenocysteine insertion in forming selenoproteins are considered, as well as the results of studies of new translational components involved in biosynthesis and incorporation of selenocysteine at different stages of translation. Similarity in the strategies of decoding UGA and UAG as codons for respectively selenocysteine and pyrrolysine is discussed. The review also presents evidence on the medical and biological role of selenium and selenoproteins containing selenocysteine as the main biological form of selenium.     

Evolution of tRNA recognition systems and tRNA gene sequences

The aminoacylation of tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases recapitulates the genetic code by dictating the association between amino acids and tRNA anticodons. The sequences of tRNAs were analyzed to investigate the nature of primordial recognition systems and to make inferences about the evolution of tRNA gene sequences and the evolution of the genetic code. Evidence is presented that primordial synthetases recognized acceptor stem nucleotides prior to the establishment of the three major phylogenetic lineages. However, acceptor stem sequences probably did not achieve a level of sequence diversity sufficient to faithfully specify the anticodon assignments of all 20 amino acids. This putative bottleneck in the evolution of the genetic code may have been alleviated by the advent of anticodon recognition. A phylogenetic analysis of tRNA gene sequences from the deep Archaea revealed groups that are united by sequence motifs which are located within a region of the tRNA that is involved in determining its tertiary structure. An association between the third anticodon nucleotide (N36) and these sequence motifs suggests that a tRNA-like structure existed close to the time that amino acid-anticodon assignments were being established. The sequence analysis also revealed that tRNA genes may evolve by anticodon mutations that recruit tRNAs from one isoaccepting group to another. Thus tRNA gene evolution may not always be monophyletic with respect to each isoaccepting group.Based on a presentation made at a workshop— Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and the Evolution of the Genetic Code—held at Berkeley, CA, July 17–20, 1994 Correspondence to: M.E. Saks     

Identifying the ligated amino acid of archaeal tRNAs based on positions outside the anticodon

Proper recognition of tRNAs by their aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for translation accuracy. Following evidence that the enzymes can recognize the correct tRNA even when anticodon information is masked, we search for additional nucleotide positions within the tRNA molecule that potentially contain information for amino acid identification. Analyzing 3936 sequences of tRNA genes from 86 archaeal species, we show that the tRNAs’ cognate amino acids can be identified by the information embedded in the tRNAs’ nucleotide positions without relying on the anticodon information. We present a small set of six to 10 informative positions along the tRNA, which allow for amino acid identification accuracy of 90.6% to 97.4%, respectively. We inspected tRNAs for each of the 20 amino acid types for such informative positions and found that tRNA genes for some amino acids are distinguishable from others by as few as one or two positions. The informative nucleotide positions are in agreement with nucleotide positions that were experimentally shown to affect the loaded amino acid identity. Interestingly, the knowledge gained from the tRNA genes of one archaeal phylum does not extrapolate well to another phylum. Furthermore, each species has a unique ensemble of nucleotides in the informative tRNA positions, and the similarity between the sets of positions of two distinct species reflects their evolutionary distance. Hence, we term this set of informative positions a “tRNA cipher.” It is tempting to suggest that the diverging code identified here might also serve the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase in the task of tRNA recognition.